Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Can you downclimb and still get the onsight?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page Last page  View All


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 16, 2010, 1:08 AM
Post #151 of 168 (2497 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [jt512] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
davidnn5 wrote:
...the literal definition of send (contraction of "ascend") is to get to the top.

Before this gets quoted all over the intardnet as fact, please prove that the climbing term "send" was derived from the word "ascend."

Jay

I believe it was derived from the Latin saying:
Papyrus Verto Pro Lucror


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 16, 2010, 1:08 AM
Post #152 of 168 (2493 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [snoopy138] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

snoopy138 wrote:
angry wrote:
Pull on a draw, not a send
Take, not a send
Fall, not a send
Weight the rope or your gear, not a send
Stand on a bolt, not a send
Jug a fixed fucking line, not a send

goddamnit angry, you're invalidating all my sends.

FIAL


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 16, 2010, 1:09 AM
Post #153 of 168 (2490 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [angry] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
Pull on a draw, not a send
Take, not a send
Fall, not a send
Weight the rope or your gear, not a send
Stand on a bolt, not a send
Jug a fixed fucking line, not a send

Use your god damned hands and feet (and sometimes knees) to get up a route where the rope is only there to keep you alive, without falling, on lead, = send.

Stop being a tard.

What about discrete tension?


snoopy138


Mar 16, 2010, 1:11 AM
Post #154 of 168 (2487 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
angry wrote:
Pull on a draw, not a send
Take, not a send
Fall, not a send
Weight the rope or your gear, not a send
Stand on a bolt, not a send
Jug a fixed fucking line, not a send

Use your god damned hands and feet (and sometimes knees) to get up a route where the rope is only there to keep you alive, without falling, on lead, = send.

Stop being a tard.

What about discrete tension?

I believe that depends on whether anyone sees it?


Partner j_ung


Mar 16, 2010, 1:16 AM
Post #155 of 168 (2482 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [snoopy138] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

snoopy138 wrote:
Arrogant_Bastard wrote:
angry wrote:
Pull on a draw, not a send
Take, not a send
Fall, not a send
Weight the rope or your gear, not a send
Stand on a bolt, not a send
Jug a fixed fucking line, not a send

Use your god damned hands and feet (and sometimes knees) to get up a route where the rope is only there to keep you alive, without falling, on lead, = send.

Stop being a tard.

What about discrete tension?

I believe that depends on whether anyone sees it?

Yes, you do. I hope that helps.


guangzhou


Mar 16, 2010, 1:19 AM
Post #156 of 168 (2479 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

davidnn5 wrote:
snoopy138 wrote:
davidnn5 wrote:
A hangdog would be a send, but it would not be an onsight.

You have no idea how much more awesome I now think I am. Thank you.

davidnn5 wrote:
Surely you know this already!

No, not really.

All this said, I'm a firm believer in words meaning whatever their most common usage says they mean. Perhaps in the US sportos like JT have bastardised the term "send" to the point where it's purely about style, rather than the literal fact of ascending or not Sly

I guess there remains the catch-all term "climb" !! Not that it's "cool" to just "climb" things...

Dear mister newspeak,

If you're a firm believer in what words mean, I suggest you take a writing course and learn to clarify what you're trying to say.

Words are a tool, language evolves, and the same word can have different meaning in various situations. Sport are perfect example of words evolving into new meanings. From rigging on boats, to touch-down in American foot, and luv in tennis, words are accepted but practitioners of their sports.


The key to understand language is to know what context the conversation is taking place in. Even in Academics, words have different meaning from one discipline to another. The word Volume in math doesn't mean the same thing as volume in music.

With your view of using word according to the most common use, volume in math becomes obsolete. Let's face it, volume is more commonly used to talk about how loud something is, not how much something holds.

Even in everyday speech, the same words could have a different meaning according to the topic.

The beauty of language it's it's ability to grow, evolve, and adjust. Most common, in context of rock climbing is what this thread is about. What is the most common meaning of onsight to a rock climber on this forum.

Actually, the word onsight isn't in the Webster dictionary. Nor is redpoint, and I doubt that non-climbers have ever heard the term. They may have heard the two separate words, but not the verb. Both are commonly used in numerous climbing publications worldwide. When I meet climbers from other countries, we use these words to talk about the sport we love. The jargon of our sport makes the conversation a bit easier.

You're "Down Under," so you use terms like pushy for bicycle. Bird as a slang expression for girls, and climber use crabs to clip carrots they climb routes instead of carabiners and removable hangers.(keyhole hangers)

Hangers being something that you hang cloths in the closet with if you want to know the most common use, and carrot are something you eat, not clip.

I don't buy into the most common use of a word theory. I believe that language will continue to grow and evolve. New words will be created, old world will develop new meanings. Language will expand along with knowledge.



,


Partner angry


Mar 16, 2010, 1:24 AM
Post #157 of 168 (2476 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [guangzhou] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

guangzhou wrote:
davidnn5 wrote:
snoopy138 wrote:
davidnn5 wrote:
A hangdog would be a send, but it would not be an onsight.

You have no idea how much more awesome I now think I am. Thank you.

davidnn5 wrote:
Surely you know this already!

No, not really.

All this said, I'm a firm believer in words meaning whatever their most common usage says they mean. Perhaps in the US sportos like JT have bastardised the term "send" to the point where it's purely about style, rather than the literal fact of ascending or not Sly

I guess there remains the catch-all term "climb" !! Not that it's "cool" to just "climb" things...

Dear mister newspeak,

If you're a firm believer in what words mean, I suggest you take a writing course and learn to clarify what you're trying to say.

Words are a tool, language evolves, and the same word can have different meaning in various situations. Sport are perfect example of words evolving into new meanings. From rigging on boats, to touch-down in American foot, and luv in tennis, words are accepted but practitioners of their sports.


The key to understand language is to know what context the conversation is taking place in. Even in Academics, words have different meaning from one discipline to another. The word Volume in math doesn't mean the same thing as volume in music.

With your view of using word according to the most common use, volume in math becomes obsolete. Let's face it, volume is more commonly used to talk about how loud something is, not how much something holds.

Even in everyday speech, the same words could have a different meaning according to the topic.

The beauty of language it's it's ability to grow, evolve, and adjust. Most common, in context of rock climbing is what this thread is about. What is the most common meaning of onsight to a rock climber on this forum.

Actually, the word onsight isn't in the Webster dictionary. Nor is redpoint, and I doubt that non-climbers have ever heard the term. They may have heard the two separate words, but not the verb. Both are commonly used in numerous climbing publications worldwide. When I meet climbers from other countries, we use these words to talk about the sport we love. The jargon of our sport makes the conversation a bit easier.

You're "Down Under," so you use terms like pushy for bicycle. Bird as a slang expression for girls, and climber use crabs to clip carrots they climb routes instead of carabiners and removable hangers.(keyhole hangers)

Hangers being something that you hang cloths in the closet with if you want to know the most common use, and carrot are something you eat, not clip.

I don't buy into the most common use of a word theory. I believe that language will continue to grow and evolve. New words will be created, old world will develop new meanings. Language will expand along with knowledge.



,

Verbose burn


davidnn5


Mar 16, 2010, 2:07 AM
Post #158 of 168 (2452 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2009
Posts: 348

Re: [guangzhou] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think you just proved my point that most common use is whatever the most common use is local to you.

To correct you, we call a female a 'sheila', someone like you a 'frog', blueeyedclimber would be 'red' and most of the people who lurk here would be 'drongoes', 'wankers' or various words I would blush to repeat. Sly

On the one hand, JT argues that today's definition of onsight is a bastardised version of the original mountaineering term. While golf clapping for Jay you are busy furiously writing rebuttals to why the term send couldn't possibly be a bastardisation of the original term. It's literally unthinkable that send has anything to do with ascend - why, the terms barely even sound similar!

If nothing else, I HATE consistency in people's arguments! Wink

Like red, to ensure clarity, I will no longer refer to "sending" a climb. I will refer to "notfuckuping" a climb, to clarify that it is about climbing only to the extent that one can say one did nothing wrong but didn't bother to use any one of a number of other terms that more directly refer to the style of ascent. After all, to those original climbers paving the way for the forum warriors of today, getting to the top was hardly the point, was it? Angelic

Man, I totally notfuckupped this awesome 5.-1 yesterday!


curt


Mar 16, 2010, 2:14 AM
Post #159 of 168 (2445 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

Too bad you haven't notfuckupped this thread.

Curt


davidnn5


Mar 16, 2010, 2:17 AM
Post #160 of 168 (2438 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2009
Posts: 348

Re: [curt] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

As long as I had fun!

And let's face it, with so many people here concerned about only being "right", how could one not?


Gmburns2000


Mar 16, 2010, 2:24 AM
Post #161 of 168 (2435 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

davidnn5 wrote:
As long as I had fun!

And let's face it, with so many people here concerned about only being "right", how could one not?

well, you got a few of them to pull anyway.


jt512


Mar 16, 2010, 3:21 AM
Post #162 of 168 (2417 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [angry] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
Dude, you need to stop this.

You're wrong. The "common usage" as you say is that send = redpoint.

Got it?

No matter how many times you say it, there is no such thing as a non redpoint send. Stop trying to force it, you are the ONLY ONE who thinks this way and you are WRONG.

Pull on a draw, not a send
Take, not a send
Fall, not a send
Weight the rope or your gear, not a send
Stand on a bolt, not a send
Jug a fixed fucking line, not a send

Use your god damned hands and feet (and sometimes knees) to get up a route where the rope is only there to keep you alive, without falling, on lead, = send.

Oh, good. Finally, an entrée into the is-a-flash-a-redpoint tangent.

In reply to:
Stop being a tard.

As if it's under voluntary control.

Jay


dingus


Mar 16, 2010, 1:00 PM
Post #163 of 168 (2378 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

davidnn5 wrote:
As long as I had fun!

And let's face it, with so many people here concerned about only being "right", how could one not?

Yes, the best notfuckupper is the notfuckupper having the most notfuckedup fun.

DMT


blueeyedclimber


Mar 17, 2010, 3:49 AM
Post #164 of 168 (2308 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

davidnn5 wrote:
blueeyedclimber would be 'red'

Did I just get burned by an Aussie?


davidnn5


Mar 17, 2010, 4:32 AM
Post #165 of 168 (2298 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2009
Posts: 348

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
davidnn5 wrote:
blueeyedclimber would be 'red'

Did I just get burned by an Aussie?

If you noticed it, then possibly it's one more thing I've notfuckupped. Shocked


Arrogant_Bastard


Mar 17, 2010, 5:19 AM
Post #166 of 168 (2291 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

davidnn5 wrote:
blueeyedclimber wrote:
davidnn5 wrote:
blueeyedclimber would be 'red'

Did I just get burned by an Aussie?

If you noticed it, then possibly it's one more thing I've notfuckupped. Shocked

I guess that makes it 1.


davidnn5


Mar 17, 2010, 6:34 AM
Post #167 of 168 (2280 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2009
Posts: 348

Re: [Arrogant_Bastard] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

I love arrogance, but I hate pivot tables.

In other words, your response made my shitresponseometer go nuts.


guangzhou


Jan 25, 2011, 5:05 AM
Post #168 of 168 (1892 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [davidnn5] Can you downclimb and still get the onsight? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

HEhEHEHEHE

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook