Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
Fair Trade climbing shoes?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All


basilisk


Nov 17, 2007, 6:02 AM
Post #26 of 59 (1588 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [downcycle] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

downcycle wrote:
If anyone want's to discuss any other feel-good causes, like being concerned about the impact you have on the world we live in, agreeing that people have the right to not be exploited, understanding that our obsession with meat negativly impacts our world, or believing that women are people...goofy stuff like that... maybe we could move the discussion to a more appropriate location, or PM me.

And remember kids:
Fair trade = Patriotism
Walmart = Imperialism

Nice to see someone on the same page as myself every now and then. You may be interested in http://www.knowmore.org. it's a corporate watch search engine designed to do exactly what you talked about above. the idea being that a simple search can show you the ethics of any company more or less at a glance. I'm in the process of putting together most of the climbing-related companies right now, although none of it is posted yet


flint


Nov 17, 2007, 6:25 AM
Post #27 of 59 (1584 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 21, 2007
Posts: 543

Re: [downcycle] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

downcycle wrote:
If anyone want's to discuss any other feel-good causes, like being concerned about the impact you have on the world we live in, agreeing that people have the right to not be exploited, understanding that our obsession with meat negativly impacts our world, or believing that women are people...goofy stuff like that... maybe we could move the discussion to a more appropriate location, or PM me.

And remember kids:
Fair trade = Patriotism
Walmart = Imperialism

So you are also one of those people that jump on the back of the top dog because everyone else does. Don't get me wrong, Wal-Mart has some things they need to change, but imperialist... I think not. Just because they are the best at what they do does not make them the enemy.

No please give me that long drawn out conversation on how Wal-Mart is only good at exporting jobs to cheeper labor markets and selling goods at a bottom dollar...

Now that little hardwear shop down the street (that I am sure you will defend,) I guess the Black and Decker hammer he is selling came from the free trade market that Wal-Mart turned down. Now lets talk about the 65 year old man that works there... with no health care at all (cue the: Shitty health care in U.S. arguement) True he might pay a large amout of his check to Wal-Mart for health care, but when he needs an opporation, his kids won't have to take out a third morgage on the house...

True this all might have been different in the 1950's, and the change to the system we have now could have been avoided, but times have changed... Is that really Wal-Marts fault?

j-


basilisk


Nov 17, 2007, 6:59 AM
Post #28 of 59 (1580 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [flint] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Flint, I realize this isn't necessarily my battle, nor can I speak for downcycle, but I would be more than happy to carry out this conversation with you. However, let us do so in the appropriate forum. Feel free to create a thread in soapbox and we can definitely get down on this


the_leech


Nov 17, 2007, 6:13 PM
Post #29 of 59 (1559 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392

Re: [downcycle] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What is this thread really all about? It's a well-played subtle troll.

Look at the facts. New account. First-time poster. No personal info listed. It's a shoe thread. And it introduces a topic guaranteed to stir the political passions of the reader on both sides of the issue.

But if I'm wrong and this is not a troll, I have this to say:

Hippie,

Why don't you make your own shoes out of hemp? Then you can scrape out your bong and use the residue to make sticky rubber.

That's what I would do if I were a hippie.


moose_droppings


Nov 17, 2007, 6:48 PM
Post #30 of 59 (1546 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [downcycle] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Trying to do the right thing for you? Then whatever floats your boat.
Just Remember,
no good deed goes unpunished, especially around here.


moment


Nov 17, 2007, 7:29 PM
Post #31 of 59 (1535 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 18, 2006
Posts: 4

Re: [downcycle] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This question confuses me. Troll? Just joined rc.com, so probably... But if not, where are climbing shoes typically made? Five Ten are typically made in the US, Scarpa and La Sportiva in Italy, Boreal in Spain, Red Chili in Germany, etc.

This is not exactly analogous to independent, impoverished farmers in Columbia growing coffee beans...


macblaze


Nov 17, 2007, 9:10 PM
Post #32 of 59 (1525 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 807

Re: [flint] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

flint wrote:
downcycle wrote:
If anyone want's to discuss any other feel-good causes, like being concerned about the impact you have on the world we live in, agreeing that people have the right to not be exploited, understanding that our obsession with meat negativly impacts our world, or believing that women are people...goofy stuff like that... maybe we could move the discussion to a more appropriate location, or PM me.

And remember kids:
Fair trade = Patriotism
Walmart = Imperialism

So you are also one of those people that jump on the back of the top dog because everyone else does. Don't get me wrong, Wal-Mart has some things they need to change, but imperialist... I think not. Just because they are the best at what they do does not make them the enemy.

No please give me that long drawn out conversation on how Wal-Mart is only good at exporting jobs to cheeper labor markets and selling goods at a bottom dollar...

Now that little hardwear shop down the street (that I am sure you will defend,) I guess the Black and Decker hammer he is selling came from the free trade market that Wal-Mart turned down. Now lets talk about the 65 year old man that works there... with no health care at all (cue the: Shitty health care in U.S. arguement) True he might pay a large amout of his check to Wal-Mart for health care, but when he needs an opporation, his kids won't have to take out a third morgage on the house...

True this all might have been different in the 1950's, and the change to the system we have now could have been avoided, but times have changed... Is that really Wal-Marts fault?

j-

Small town, stable economy, mostly locally owned stuff with a few smaller chain stores here and there. Most everybody's happy with the product, happy with the service. People make a road trip to the city twice a year to stock up on cheap rubber boots and work clothes and the occasion nice dress.

Then one day Walmart arrives. Woo Hoo everyone proclaims. New jobs, cheap stuff, one less trip to the cit a year (still need that nice dress, remember). Everyone's on the Walmart wagon.

First the local clothes store shuts down. Then one of the smaller groceries. Walmart starts controlling the towns job economy for those willing to work for under $9/hr (teens, seniors and housewives etc). Next the local garden center folds and so does the small hardware store. The other store that used to close at 6 now has to stay open to 11 to compete which means he has to bring on more staff even though he is actually getting less sales...

Now lets say then Walmart decides to make a change. Could be anything significant. Move down the highway to the next town, stop carrying garden products. What happens to that nice small town now. It's entire culture and economy is now built around this big foreign interest. It can't go back but it has no future without Walmart...

Man that is so the exact definition of Imperialism...

(edited to remove the stray bolding)


(This post was edited by macblaze on Nov 17, 2007, 9:12 PM)


bobruef


Nov 17, 2007, 10:19 PM
Post #33 of 59 (1513 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 884

Re: [ja1484] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ja1484 wrote:
Thing is, no one cares about those "causes", not even the people claiming to support them. Do you buy fair trade Gas? Fair trade automobiles? Fair trade everything?

Nah. Too inconvenient. Just get in there when the getting's easy, because then you can pretend you're morally superior. Nice warm fuzzy feeling.

At least I admit I don't care, as opposed to trying to fool myself.

Why would it bother you to see people support causes like this? Do you feel morally inferior? Does it detriment you to see people support causes that are consistent with there value (which however they may differ from yours are no less relevant)?

The point is not an all or none approach. if all anyone did was do a little something to help only when it was convenient, they'd still be doing something to help, rather than shrugging their shoulders from the comfort of their developed nation. Whether or not someone buys fair trade "everything" is hardly a measure of their consistency on an issue. You should abstain from arguments like this because they leave you with much less credibility, and make you look like an all around ass.


shockabuku


Nov 17, 2007, 11:46 PM
Post #34 of 59 (1504 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [macblaze] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

And apparently your alternative is socialism; a well regarded failure.


moose_droppings


Nov 18, 2007, 12:19 AM
Post #35 of 59 (1495 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371

Re: [macblaze] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macblaze wrote:
flint wrote:
downcycle wrote:
If anyone want's to discuss any other feel-good causes, like being concerned about the impact you have on the world we live in, agreeing that people have the right to not be exploited, understanding that our obsession with meat negativly impacts our world, or believing that women are people...goofy stuff like that... maybe we could move the discussion to a more appropriate location, or PM me.

And remember kids:
Fair trade = Patriotism
Walmart = Imperialism

So you are also one of those people that jump on the back of the top dog because everyone else does. Don't get me wrong, Wal-Mart has some things they need to change, but imperialist... I think not. Just because they are the best at what they do does not make them the enemy.

No please give me that long drawn out conversation on how Wal-Mart is only good at exporting jobs to cheeper labor markets and selling goods at a bottom dollar...

Now that little hardwear shop down the street (that I am sure you will defend,) I guess the Black and Decker hammer he is selling came from the free trade market that Wal-Mart turned down. Now lets talk about the 65 year old man that works there... with no health care at all (cue the: Shitty health care in U.S. arguement) True he might pay a large amout of his check to Wal-Mart for health care, but when he needs an opporation, his kids won't have to take out a third morgage on the house...

True this all might have been different in the 1950's, and the change to the system we have now could have been avoided, but times have changed... Is that really Wal-Marts fault?

j-

Small town, stable economy, mostly locally owned stuff with a few smaller chain stores here and there. Most everybody's happy with the product, happy with the service. People make a road trip to the city twice a year to stock up on cheap rubber boots and work clothes and the occasion nice dress.

Then one day Walmart arrives. Woo Hoo everyone proclaims. New jobs, cheap stuff, one less trip to the cit a year (still need that nice dress, remember). Everyone's on the Walmart wagon.

First the local clothes store shuts down. Then one of the smaller groceries. Walmart starts controlling the towns job economy for those willing to work for under $9/hr (teens, seniors and housewives etc). Next the local garden center folds and so does the small hardware store. The other store that used to close at 6 now has to stay open to 11 to compete which means he has to bring on more staff even though he is actually getting less sales...

Now lets say then Walmart decides to make a change. Could be anything significant. Move down the highway to the next town, stop carrying garden products. What happens to that nice small town now. It's entire culture and economy is now built around this big foreign interest. It can't go back but it has no future without Walmart...

Man that is so the exact definition of Imperialism...

(edited to remove the stray bolding)

In reality, this is really called capitalism. Been going on for years.


ja1484


Nov 18, 2007, 2:27 AM
Post #36 of 59 (1485 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 1935

Re: [bobruef] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bobruef wrote:
Why would it bother you to see people support causes like this? Do you feel morally inferior? Does it detriment you to see people support causes that are consistent with there value (which however they may differ from yours are no less relevant)?

The point is not an all or none approach. if all anyone did was do a little something to help only when it was convenient, they'd still be doing something to help, rather than shrugging their shoulders from the comfort of their developed nation. Whether or not someone buys fair trade "everything" is hardly a measure of their consistency on an issue. You should abstain from arguments like this because they leave you with much less credibility, and make you look like an all around ass.


The crux is more to do with why someone doesn't buy fair trade consistently. Because it's inconvenient? Pretty much.

The thing that's amusing in the situation that you described above is that when people do a little something when it's convenient, they're doing it for them, not for the people they're supposedly "helping".

Fair trade coffee is awesome...as long as I don't have to drive to another coffee shop to get it. Is there some reason people can't admit to themselves that the world is unfair and that's life?


ja1484


Nov 18, 2007, 2:32 AM
Post #37 of 59 (1483 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 1935

Re: [macblaze] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macblaze wrote:
Small town, stable economy, mostly locally owned stuff with a few smaller chain stores here and there. Most everybody's happy with the product, happy with the service. People make a road trip to the city twice a year to stock up on cheap rubber boots and work clothes and the occasion nice dress.

Then one day Walmart arrives. Woo Hoo everyone proclaims. New jobs, cheap stuff, one less trip to the cit a year (still need that nice dress, remember). Everyone's on the Walmart wagon.

First the local clothes store shuts down. Then one of the smaller groceries. Walmart starts controlling the towns job economy for those willing to work for under $9/hr (teens, seniors and housewives etc). Next the local garden center folds and so does the small hardware store. The other store that used to close at 6 now has to stay open to 11 to compete which means he has to bring on more staff even though he is actually getting less sales...

Now lets say then Walmart decides to make a change. Could be anything significant. Move down the highway to the next town, stop carrying garden products. What happens to that nice small town now. It's entire culture and economy is now built around this big foreign interest. It can't go back but it has no future without Walmart...

Man that is so the exact definition of Imperialism...

(edited to remove the stray bolding)


My favorite part about scenarios like this is that commonly (I am not saying this applies to the poster quoted) people are against multi-national corporations and for aid to third world/developing countries.

Which one ya want?

It's like the global warming thing - EVERYTHING gets spun to be evidence of global warming and the threat it poses. Remember last year when they were predicting a record hurricane season here in the US?

Oops.

Of course, we got a record *drought* in hurricane country instead. But it's the GLOBAL WARMING (AHH! RUN!) that's causing this. And this line is fed to us by the same yahoos who predicted the record hurricane season.

These chumps are guessing, and they're relying on panic to keep people blind to the fact that they have no idea what they're talking about, their predictions are worthless, and they don't even know if warming is a problem or not. And yet, the sheeple of the western world continue to wring their hands and have strokes at young ages.

Bottom line: 9 times out of 10, if someone has a cause, it's mainly because they want to bullshit you into agreeing with them and/or getting their way. Religion's been workin' that angle for millennium.


(This post was edited by ja1484 on Nov 18, 2007, 2:34 AM)


macblaze


Nov 18, 2007, 3:26 AM
Post #38 of 59 (1472 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 807

Re: [ja1484] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ja1484 wrote:
macblaze wrote:
Small town, stable economy, mostly locally owned stuff with a few smaller chain stores here and there. Most everybody's happy with the product, happy with the service. People make a road trip to the city twice a year to stock up on cheap rubber boots and work clothes and the occasion nice dress.

Then one day Walmart arrives. Woo Hoo everyone proclaims. New jobs, cheap stuff, one less trip to the cit a year (still need that nice dress, remember). Everyone's on the Walmart wagon.

First the local clothes store shuts down. Then one of the smaller groceries. Walmart starts controlling the towns job economy for those willing to work for under $9/hr (teens, seniors and housewives etc). Next the local garden center folds and so does the small hardware store. The other store that used to close at 6 now has to stay open to 11 to compete which means he has to bring on more staff even though he is actually getting less sales...

Now lets say then Walmart decides to make a change. Could be anything significant. Move down the highway to the next town, stop carrying garden products. What happens to that nice small town now. It's entire culture and economy is now built around this big foreign interest. It can't go back but it has no future without Walmart...

Man that is so the exact definition of Imperialism...

(edited to remove the stray bolding)


My favorite part about scenarios like this is that commonly (I am not saying this applies to the poster quoted) people are against multi-national corporations and for aid to third world/developing countries.

Which one ya want?

It's like the global warming thing - EVERYTHING gets spun to be evidence of global warming and the threat it poses. Remember last year when they were predicting a record hurricane season here in the US?

Oops.

Of course, we got a record *drought* in hurricane country instead. But it's the GLOBAL WARMING (AHH! RUN!) that's causing this. And this line is fed to us by the same yahoos who predicted the record hurricane season.

These chumps are guessing, and they're relying on panic to keep people blind to the fact that they have no idea what they're talking about, their predictions are worthless, and they don't even know if warming is a problem or not. And yet, the sheeple of the western world continue to wring their hands and have strokes at young ages.

Bottom line: 9 times out of 10, if someone has a cause, it's mainly because they want to bullshit you into agreeing with them and/or getting their way. Religion's been workin' that angle for millennium.

Oddly enough I agree with you. I'm not saying Walmart is the Nazi regime, but we are fooling ourselves if we can't see the similarities between it and the British Empire at its finest. And what did it leave in its wake... a whole lot of issues we are paying for now (and I mean that in a monetary sense!). An I resent that just like I resent the fact that so many ^%#* hikers abuse the countryside so badly I have to book ahead to enjoy nature.

So why not lets be smart about it this time, cut back on the multi nationals, support he little guys, here and in Guatemala or where ever and try not to think too much about saving $.50 on our rubber boots...


(This post was edited by macblaze on Nov 18, 2007, 3:27 AM)


basilisk


Nov 18, 2007, 3:50 AM
Post #39 of 59 (1460 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [shockabuku] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shockabuku wrote:
And apparently your alternative is socialism; a well regarded failure.

If you believe socialism to be a well regarded failure then you have a very poor understanding of socialism.

ja1484 wrote:
Of course, we got a record *drought* in hurricane country instead. But it's the GLOBAL WARMING (AHH! RUN!) that's causing this. And this line is fed to us by the same yahoos who predicted the record hurricane season.

These chumps are guessing, and they're relying on panic to keep people blind to the fact that they have no idea what they're talking about, their predictions are worthless, and they don't even know if warming is a problem or not. And yet, the sheeple of the western world continue to wring their hands and have strokes at young ages.

Just the same, you have a very poor understanding of Global Warming. If you believed those "yahoos" (good word choice) who predicted the record hurricane season, then you're just blind person following yet another blind person. Like you, the people who predicted that don't understand the slightest thing about Global Warming. Are you also of the understand that the whole planet will get nice and toasty? Not so much. Global Warming results in extreme weather. This is exemplified by hurricane country: a record season one year, followed by a record season on the other end of the spectrum the next. Similarly we had the massive European drought in the summer of '06. Then the winter of '06/'07 Russia got ridiculously cold. Global Warming causes extreme weather on both sides of the spectrum. Not just toasty goodness.

My biggest frustration is when people argue about things they don't even try to understand. I'm not saying I know everything, but if you want to have a discussion, one would be wise to learn a little bit about it before they start throwing insults and blame.

I noticed there still isn't a Wal Mart thread in soapbox. Not that important, eh?


ja1484


Nov 18, 2007, 4:05 AM
Post #40 of 59 (1458 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 1935

Re: [basilisk] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

basilisk wrote:
Just the same, you have a very poor understanding of Global Warming. If you believed those "yahoos" (good word choice) who predicted the record hurricane season, then you're just blind person following yet another blind person. Like you, the people who predicted that don't understand the slightest thing about Global Warming. Are you also of the understand that the whole planet will get nice and toasty? Not so much. Global Warming results in extreme weather. This is exemplified by hurricane country: a record season one year, followed by a record season on the other end of the spectrum the next. Similarly we had the massive European drought in the summer of '06. Then the winter of '06/'07 Russia got ridiculously cold. Global Warming causes extreme weather on both sides of the spectrum. Not just toasty goodness.

No, I understand global warming just fine. I also understand the *situation* pertaining to global warming quite well.

Guess what? The climate's been changing....

FOREVER!

We're not getting any "extreme weather" right now. None of what is occurring is unprecedented in the geological and climatological history of the planet. It's unprecedented since we've been living in these areas.

It is a major delusion on the part of humanity to assume we can control something as awesome and dynamic as the planet's climate. We are going to have our effect as a species, the planet will alter, and there is no way we can meaningfully control it.

I offer a solution to people who will be inconvenienced by changing weather:

Move. There's plenty of real estate getting meterologically more friendly as other parts of the planet are becoming less so.

Upset that you'll have to uproot and adapt to change? I'm sure the planet pities you.


basilisk


Nov 18, 2007, 4:28 AM
Post #41 of 59 (1448 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 1, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [ja1484] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ja1484 wrote:
No, I understand global warming just fine. I also understand the *situation* pertaining to global warming quite well.

As evidenced by this post, I have a hard time believing that.

ja1484 wrote:
Guess what? The climate's been changing....

FOREVER!

Correct. Yet if you'd actually done some research on Global Warming, you would understand that it's changing drastically differently than ever before. Before you bring up some "only since RECORDED weather!" argument, we have plenty of soil samples and glacier cores to prove it. We know what the weather was like perfectly well thousands of years ago.

ja1484 wrote:
We're not getting any "extreme weather" right now. None of what is occurring is unprecedented in the geological and climatological history of the planet. It's unprecedented since we've been living in these areas.

I'll be perfectly honest, I'm not paying attention to the world weather right now. But just because you don't know it's happening doesn't mean it isn't.

ja1484 wrote:
It is a major delusion on the part of humanity to assume we can control something as awesome and dynamic as the planet's climate.

Is it? We control everything else. Take a visit to any major city, then take a nice deep breath. Refreshing? No? Too much smog, huh? There's one example of controlling weather on a small scale. On a larger scale we could talk about all the factories in the mid-west causing acid rain in New England. Then there's all of us driving cars, burning coal and oil, etc. I think it's perfectly conceivable that we're altering our climate.

ja1484 wrote:
We are going to have our effect as a species, the planet will alter, and there is no way we can meaningfully control it.

Are you aware that you just confessed to understanding Global Warming as fact?

ja1484 wrote:
I offer a solution to people who will be inconvenienced by changing weather:

Move.

I don't think the state of Florida, nor the city of New York will take very kindly to this idea when they're twenty feet underwater. I know I wouldn't. Also, you once again referenced Global warming as fact.

ja1484 wrote:
There's plenty of real estate getting meterologically more friendly as other parts of the planet are becoming less so.

Well, no. As I said earlier, climates are moving towards one extreme or another. There won't be too much of a middle ground.

ja1484 wrote:
Upset that you'll have to uproot and adapt to change? I'm sure the planet pities you.
Not fact-based at all, but an interesting idea: Perhaps the planet hates us and is trying to get rid of us. Humans are a lot like cancer when you think about it.


shockabuku


Nov 18, 2007, 4:54 AM
Post #42 of 59 (1440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [basilisk] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

basilisk wrote:
shockabuku wrote:
And apparently your alternative is socialism; a well regarded failure.

If you believe socialism to be a well regarded failure then you have a very poor understanding of socialism.

Perhaps you could educate me as to it's resounding successes - those implemented on a national or greater scale.

And, as a supplementary note, if you chose to try to do so, some inclusion of fact would be useful as opposed to the drivel in your response to ja1484 above.


(This post was edited by shockabuku on Nov 18, 2007, 4:58 AM)


ja1484


Nov 18, 2007, 5:21 AM
Post #43 of 59 (1431 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 1935

Re: [basilisk] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

basilisk wrote:
Correct. Yet if you'd actually done some research on Global Warming, you would understand that it's changing drastically differently than ever before. Before you bring up some "only since RECORDED weather!" argument, we have plenty of soil samples and glacier cores to prove it. We know what the weather was like perfectly well thousands of years ago.

Exactly, which is why we know that it's not really any different from what's occurring today. The illusion most people is under is that things are actually occurring differently (as you seem to be), usually based on horribly exaggerated IPCC reports which are, frankly, an affront to actual science.


In reply to:
I'll be perfectly honest, I'm not paying attention to the world weather right now. But just because you don't know it's happening doesn't mean it isn't.

I'm not denying global warming is occurring. We know it is for sure. What's amusing is that people think we're the entire cause or that we can stop it.


In reply to:
Is it? We control everything else. Take a visit to any major city, then take a nice deep breath. Refreshing? No? Too much smog, huh? There's one example of controlling weather on a small scale. On a larger scale we could talk about all the factories in the mid-west causing acid rain in New England. Then there's all of us driving cars, burning coal and oil, etc. I think it's perfectly conceivable that we're altering our climate.

Altering? Maybe, but again, not out of line with what's happened before. And no, we don't control weather or climate. Smog in a city is not weather. Next time a hurricane is headed for New Orleans, you flip a switch and turn that sucker off. THEN you might have an argument. The only reason anyone would have cause to be worried about climate change is precisely because it's not something we can stop.



In reply to:
Are you aware that you just confessed to understanding Global Warming as fact?

Once again: Global warming is indeed occurring. Never argued against that. The cause, the ramifications, and the effect we believe we can have on it is where most of the misinformation is.

In reply to:
I don't think the state of Florida, nor the city of New York will take very kindly to this idea when they're twenty feet underwater. I know I wouldn't.

Tough shit? As stated, we can't stop it. Besides, even the UN's gloomiest predictions put sea level rise at 17 inches by 2099, and that little clairvoyance is called into question by the fact that the rate of sea level change has been pretty close to constant for the past 80 years.

A foot and a half? In a century? You do realize that even very low lying areas like New York and Florida are still typically 5 to 10 feet above sea level?

You're right, they should be worried...they're gonna have to move inland....really slowly.


In reply to:
Well, no. As I said earlier, climates are moving towards one extreme or another. There won't be too much of a middle ground.

Some crystal ball you got there. Tell me: If the IPCC has to revise its short term climate predictions by 50 - 500% after FIVE YEARS, then exactly how do you know where the climate's going to end up in the future with any accuracy?

You don't. You're reiterating the doomsday predictions of climate "scientists" who lose all their funding if there's no crisis.

Lemme explain something about validity and reliability in predictors: Said predictors need to demonstrate consistent ability to accurately predict results within a certain level of error. They *also* have to demonstrate that these measures are of the variables they purport to be, and not of lurking or confounding variables (validity). And, they have to demonstrate this ability over multiple trials (reliability). Climate models never have, and likely never will. Guess what climate "scientists" do? After the answers come back, they go back and change their models until the "right" answer pops out. While they claim this is leading to more accurate models (it isn't, because absolutely nothing has demonstrated that climate is a repeating system in any kind of regularity), all they're really doing is changing their test answers after they see the key.

IPCC report #3 predicted that human warming forcings were 2.43 watts per sq. meter since 1750. Six years later, IPCC report #4 changed this estimate to 1.6 watts per sq. m. Why the drastic (33%ish) change? Well, temperature failed to rise to the level they predicted, necessitating that they go back and "correct" their numbers. This is just one of scads of examples where predictions (especially those of doom) continue not to pan out. Despite the major changes in the numbers predicted every few years, bozos of ill perception in innumerable amounts continue to worry over predictions for the next CENTURY, even though these jackasses at the IPCC can't get any meaningful level of accuracy at the 5 year mark.

How more people don't see this whole fear-mongering hullabaloo for the charade it is is beyond me.

In reply to:
Not fact-based at all, but an interesting idea: Perhaps the planet hates us and is trying to get rid of us. Humans are a lot like cancer when you think about it.


It's possible. If the planet doesn't want us around - we won't be. Reference above about not being able to control things.

And I prefer to liken us, as Bill Hicks put it, to a "virus with shoes".


(This post was edited by ja1484 on Nov 18, 2007, 4:25 PM)


the_leech


Nov 18, 2007, 6:17 AM
Post #44 of 59 (1414 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392

Re: [ja1484] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Y'all wouldn't be fighting about this nonsense if everyone just wore fair-traded hemp climbing shoes.


chris_23


Nov 18, 2007, 8:40 PM
Post #45 of 59 (1377 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 31

Re: [ja1484] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ja1484 wrote:
downcycle wrote:
They are also dedicated to saving Laurel Knob, which should interest you, ja1484. I also have to say that when you use "libs" as an insult directed at someone pursuing fair trade options, and refer to the green movement, fair trade, vegetarianism, feminism as "goofy stuff," you are aligning yourself with Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly, so it is hard to assume otherwise.


Those are goofy things, and Bill O and Rush have far far worse things that they believe in.

Thing is, no one cares about those "causes", not even the people claiming to support them. Do you buy fair trade Gas? Fair trade automobiles? Fair trade everything?

Nah. Too inconvenient. Just get in there when the getting's easy, because then you can pretend you're morally superior. Nice warm fuzzy feeling.

At least I admit I don't care, as opposed to trying to fool myself.

Acctually there are people who go out of their way and inconvinience themselves in life to try to live a morally acceptable lifestyle, rather than being too lazy to inconvinience themselves and in turn come up with horrible arguments about why other people arnt perfect....of course buddy who is trying to get fairly made shoes isnt perfect but hes at least making an effort, and yes inconveniencing himself to look for a moral shoe rather than whatever shoe chris sharma is wearing.

before you go saying that hes too lazy and just trying to feel morrally superior to you, maybe consider that while he doesnt buy fair trade gas...maybe he just doesnt drive...maybe you can keep yourself ignorant and not think about how our opulence is destroying the world around us and will eventually consume us the rich...but some people do believe that the people on the other end of our shoes are equal people and by demanding acceptably produced goods, we can change manufacturing standards across the board.

the thing that i like the best is that its never the vegan local fair trade "LIBS" that are slamming people(who you would thing would be slamming people for being assholes)...no its usually the asshole that isnt happy himself and deep down cant justify his actions when they are compared with someone who cares....maybe you should start caring about other people buddy, because someday you might want someone to care about you, and...well it wont be easy to forget how big of an asshole you were to anyone who was asking an honest question that didnt hurt you in any way but you pride


climberboy193838


Nov 18, 2007, 9:59 PM
Post #46 of 59 (1362 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 22, 2005
Posts: 94

Re: [chris_23] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ok, i understand where all of you are coming from with the fair trade stuff and getting rid of the "imperialist" multinationals such as wal-mart, but those outsourcing multinationals are still providing millions of jobs for people whose own economies could not support them without the outsourced jobs from the US and other larger countries. Ultimately we are helping fight poverty, at the expense of the environment, but people's LIVES dependent on the minimum wage that these factories provide.

You have all seen the commercials of the little children in the third world countries, and the poor conditions they live in, but how many of you have experienced or seen these conditions for yourselves?

Ive been to a third world country. no not for tourism, not to just look around to see what bad conditions they live in, but not do anything. No. I went there to help build a clinic in a town that had a population of over 3000 people living in a completely different 21st century than us. The nearest hospital is a 2 hour's drive in either direction through mountain roads, many of them dont have cars to actually drive, making it near impossible to get to the hospitals that may or may not be able to take care of them. These people along with many others who might even live in worse conditions would kill for the part-time jobs at walmart that you say dont pay enough. They would kill for the opportunity to work in a factory would pay them even a little more than the crops that they make with their own 2 hands.

You people are all concentrating on the wrong issue. Global warming-scientifically proven to be something that is a natural cycle. Thus why we have ice ages that we come out of. I think the ocean levels might have gone up a few inches then too. Instead you need to be concentrating on how to help those in 3rd world countries who dont even have factory jobs that dont pay enough. Why worry about the ones who already have jobs that allow them to eat and feed their families, why not concentrate on bettering the conditions of the ones who dont. hospitals and clinics could be built with the money that you want to give towards giving fair wages for work, thats lives, not comfort.

Try and do something that allows people to live. Im not saying give up everything and go help. Just stop bashing the multinationals for doing something that helps them in their pursuit of money, being that we live in a free enterprise economy and all, and helps others live where they may not be able to because of a surplus of people and a lack of jobs.


chris_23


Nov 18, 2007, 10:47 PM
Post #47 of 59 (1349 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 31

Re: [climberboy193838] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climberboy193838 wrote:
Ok, i understand where all of you are coming from with the fair trade stuff and getting rid of the "imperialist" multinationals such as wal-mart, but those outsourcing multinationals are still providing millions of jobs for people whose own economies could not support them without the outsourced jobs from the US and other larger countries. Ultimately we are helping fight poverty, at the expense of the environment, but people's LIVES dependent on the minimum wage that these factories provide.

You have all seen the commercials of the little children in the third world countries, and the poor conditions they live in, but how many of you have experienced or seen these conditions for yourselves?

Ive been to a third world country. no not for tourism, not to just look around to see what bad conditions they live in, but not do anything. No. I went there to help build a clinic in a town that had a population of over 3000 people living in a completely different 21st century than us. The nearest hospital is a 2 hour's drive in either direction through mountain roads, many of them dont have cars to actually drive, making it near impossible to get to the hospitals that may or may not be able to take care of them. These people along with many others who might even live in worse conditions would kill for the part-time jobs at walmart that you say dont pay enough. They would kill for the opportunity to work in a factory would pay them even a little more than the crops that they make with their own 2 hands.

You people are all concentrating on the wrong issue. Global warming-scientifically proven to be something that is a natural cycle. Thus why we have ice ages that we come out of. I think the ocean levels might have gone up a few inches then too. Instead you need to be concentrating on how to help those in 3rd world countries who dont even have factory jobs that dont pay enough. Why worry about the ones who already have jobs that allow them to eat and feed their families, why not concentrate on bettering the conditions of the ones who dont. hospitals and clinics could be built with the money that you want to give towards giving fair wages for work, thats lives, not comfort.

Try and do something that allows people to live. Im not saying give up everything and go help. Just stop bashing the multinationals for doing something that helps them in their pursuit of money, being that we live in a free enterprise economy and all, and helps others live where they may not be able to because of a surplus of people and a lack of jobs.

o thats such a BS answer to that problem...guess what buddy i spent 3 months living in a shanty town in zambia not touring not building some clinic that will fail due to lack of planning but living with the people finding out what real issues are for them, and no i didnt go with some brainwashing organization, it was an independently funded and planned trip. And its bullshit to say that we are doing those people a favor by giving providing them with less than 1 american dollar a day to live on supporting 6 brothers and sisters that were orphaned by aids. The fact is that if we stopped taking advantage of these people by paying them next to nothing while we buy our 6000 dollar trad racks, or built our own 6ooo dollar home climbing walls.

and dont even get me started on that bullshit about global warming being a scam...the fact is that the risk of global warming is too great to ignore yet its too easy to just say some scientest proved it was a scam so i guess i can go on driving my hummers and buying cheap oil based products...do you even know anything about what those scientists said in their studies or did you just hear part of a conversation or read it in the newspaper or see it on tv or the internet and adopt it as your theory because it means you can go on living your affluent lifestyle guilt free. of course we need to be worrying about the people in third world countries but we also need to look at our impact on the planet, and there is so much more to the environmental issue than just global warming.

the thing is we could still enjoy our wonderful sport of climbing, but if we demanded that our products were made of vegan(non leather) organic(for cottons and such) and that wages in countries be fair. well then the impact on social and environment would not stand in the way of our sport.

and whoever made that comment on feminism being bs, i hope your girlfriend knows that you think she is dirt and that she doesnt deserve the things that you have and that you think that she should be in the kitchen all day instead of going to school or getting a job.


ja1484


Nov 18, 2007, 11:10 PM
Post #48 of 59 (1342 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 1935

Re: [chris_23] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
I think I'm gonna head to Wal-Mart now and buy some goods made in a third-world sweatshop.

Anyone wanna join?!?


the_leech


Nov 18, 2007, 11:46 PM
Post #49 of 59 (1329 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2007
Posts: 392

Re: [ja1484] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ja1484 wrote:
I think I'm gonna head to Wal-Mart now and buy some goods made in a third-world sweatshop.

Anyone wanna join?!?

I can't make it tonight, but could you pick me up a pair of fair trade hemp-n-bong-resin climbing shoes while you're out?

Thanks.


flint


Nov 19, 2007, 2:17 AM
Post #50 of 59 (1305 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 21, 2007
Posts: 543

Re: [basilisk] Fair Trade climbing shoes? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Basilisk, your knowledge on everything is just to overwhelming for to much of an argument... I mean, you clearly know everything from third world development practices to global warming. How am I to compare..Crazy

Maybe, I don't feel the need to debate the Wal-Mart issue because no matter what facts are put infront of you, you will never change your opinion and will undoughtably find lots of information (skewed) toward your cause on the internet.

Why do so many people pay so much money for research, Because the best researches start at the conclusion you want and work backwards to find the evidince.

So you take your opinions on small town goodness and think of it what you will, but the day when you stop following blindly and look up some opposing information, I only ask that you do it with an open mind.

To keep with all topics on this thread, I ask that you look up information on which car is cleaner for the environment, The hummer or prius... you can find research supporting both. But for all the green advocates, It is true that the air coming out of a 911 turbo while driving threw a polluted city is cleaner that the air it started with...Crazy

For a conclusive answer to the Wal-Mart issue Basilisk, the clearist answer was allready stated above by Moose Droppings. Take a look.

Hey ja1484, can you point me to the only produced by third world countries section, or do they only have that in those fancy Target places. Maybe Lary down at the small town store has some Made in Africa goods for purchase.

Where is Majid with his faithful post:

The U.S.A. flag is made in ChinaCrazyCrazyCrazy

j-

First page Previous page 1 2 3 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook