|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 7:47 PM
Post #151 of 190
(3474 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
carabiner96 wrote: You guys managed to ruin a perfectly good thread. Don't worry, there are several copies of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Jan 25, 2011, 7:59 PM
Post #152 of 190
(3461 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
kyote321 wrote: cracklover wrote: I think most folks condemn climbs like these as being inappropriate for their settings. But such things will keep being done. The fact that there is a new adherent to this style, though, in the next generation, is definitely a bummer. GO and what setting is that? as more and more cracks are sent, the faces are what is left. They get bolted. On slabs, handdrilling from a stance is an option, but on steep terrain, it isn't. Bolting could be done on lead, with bolts 3' feet apart. Is that somehow better than rapbolting? I could understand the uproar if Lama was bolting a crack. There are more options than drilling from a stance and rap bolting. Drilling from hooks come immediately to mind. But you know, I both agree and disagree with you. If the mountain gave a shit how many bolts it had, would it wonder whether X number of rap-drilled bolts were any worse than the same number of bolts drilled on lead? Probably not. From the rock's perspective, holes is holes. Viscerally however, this just seems like a pussy thing to do relatively speaking, and I'm sure a lot of folks feel the same way. Personally, I would care if a significant portion of my peers thought I was a pussy. Maybe Lama doesn't. I dunno.
(This post was edited by j_ung on Jan 25, 2011, 8:00 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 8:44 PM
Post #153 of 190
(3432 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Don't mind spike boy, he's just having a hard time keeping his contradictory ideas about opinions clear in his own head. I'm not the one having an issue here. You continually over- complicate and over-think the issue. I'm sorry that you're having a hard time following a complicated subject like climbing ethics. However; as your contradicting viewpoints on this subject illustrate things are rarely black and white. it IS black and white, until you nobs overthinking overcomplicate and overdo the whole thing. its a bolt. its chalk. get over it. Oh come now. Don't get all upset and start calling people who are better traveled and more experienced than you noobs. What you don't seem to understand is that your militant stance of 'local ethics don't matter' is just as much of an ethic as those that you're rebelling against. My question to you do you even know the reason behind those local ethics that you rebelling against?
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 8:45 PM
Post #154 of 190
(3430 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Don't mind spike boy, he's just having a hard time keeping his contradictory ideas about opinions clear in his own head. I'm not the one having an issue here. You continually over- complicate and over-think the issue. I'm sorry that you're having a hard time following a complicated subject like climbing ethics. However; as your contradicting viewpoints on this subject illustrate things are rarely black and white. it IS black and white, until you nobs overthinking overcomplicate and overdo the whole thing. its a bolt. its chalk. get over it. Oh come now. Don't get all upset and start calling people who are better traveled and more experienced than you noobs. What you don't seem to understand is that your militant stance of 'local ethics don't matter' is just as much of an ethic as those that you're rebelling against. My question to you do you even know the reason behind those local ethics that you rebelling against? yes. do you.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 8:58 PM
Post #155 of 190
(3420 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Don't mind spike boy, he's just having a hard time keeping his contradictory ideas about opinions clear in his own head. I'm not the one having an issue here. You continually over- complicate and over-think the issue. I'm sorry that you're having a hard time following a complicated subject like climbing ethics. However; as your contradicting viewpoints on this subject illustrate things are rarely black and white. it IS black and white, until you nobs overthinking overcomplicate and overdo the whole thing. its a bolt. its chalk. get over it. Oh come now. Don't get all upset and start calling people who are better traveled and more experienced than you noobs. What you don't seem to understand is that your militant stance of 'local ethics don't matter' is just as much of an ethic as those that you're rebelling against. My question to you do you even know the reason behind those local ethics that you rebelling against? yes. do you. Ah, spoken like a man who is in over his head. I'm sorry that you don’t know anything about the local ethics you’re rebelling against. With your 'me first attitude' you sound like an incredibly lazy and self centered person who just stepped off the plastic.
|
|
|
|
|
dreday3000
Jan 25, 2011, 8:59 PM
Post #156 of 190
(3418 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566
|
carabiner96 wrote: You guys managed to ruin a perfectly good thread. +1
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 9:00 PM
Post #157 of 190
(3411 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Don't mind spike boy, he's just having a hard time keeping his contradictory ideas about opinions clear in his own head. I'm not the one having an issue here. You continually over- complicate and over-think the issue. I'm sorry that you're having a hard time following a complicated subject like climbing ethics. However; as your contradicting viewpoints on this subject illustrate things are rarely black and white. it IS black and white, until you nobs overthinking overcomplicate and overdo the whole thing. its a bolt. its chalk. get over it. Oh come now. Don't get all upset and start calling people who are better traveled and more experienced than you noobs. What you don't seem to understand is that your militant stance of 'local ethics don't matter' is just as much of an ethic as those that you're rebelling against. My question to you do you even know the reason behind those local ethics that you rebelling against? yes. do you. Ah, spoken like a man who is in over his head. I'm sorry that you don’t know anything about the local ethics you’re rebelling against. With your 'me first attitude' you sound like an incredibly lazy and self centered person who just stepped off the plastic. now is when i ask you to point out a local ethic i've broken. go.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 9:06 PM
Post #158 of 190
(3408 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Don't mind spike boy, he's just having a hard time keeping his contradictory ideas about opinions clear in his own head. I'm not the one having an issue here. You continually over- complicate and over-think the issue. I'm sorry that you're having a hard time following a complicated subject like climbing ethics. However; as your contradicting viewpoints on this subject illustrate things are rarely black and white. it IS black and white, until you nobs overthinking overcomplicate and overdo the whole thing. its a bolt. its chalk. get over it. Oh come now. Don't get all upset and start calling people who are better traveled and more experienced than you noobs. What you don't seem to understand is that your militant stance of 'local ethics don't matter' is just as much of an ethic as those that you're rebelling against. My question to you do you even know the reason behind those local ethics that you rebelling against? yes. do you. Ah, spoken like a man who is in over his head. I'm sorry that you don’t know anything about the local ethics you’re rebelling against. With your 'me first attitude' you sound like an incredibly lazy and self centered person who just stepped off the plastic. now is when i ask you to point out a local ethic i've broken. go. I never said you did. However you've stated that local ethics should be ignored. I find it very hard to believe that you would state such a thing so strongly and yet never have done so. Besides, I know some of the people you climb with and I know about your last boudering trip up on the North Shore. . . . (small world huh?)
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 9:11 PM
Post #159 of 190
(3403 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Don't mind spike boy, he's just having a hard time keeping his contradictory ideas about opinions clear in his own head. I'm not the one having an issue here. You continually over- complicate and over-think the issue. I'm sorry that you're having a hard time following a complicated subject like climbing ethics. However; as your contradicting viewpoints on this subject illustrate things are rarely black and white. it IS black and white, until you nobs overthinking overcomplicate and overdo the whole thing. its a bolt. its chalk. get over it. Oh come now. Don't get all upset and start calling people who are better traveled and more experienced than you noobs. What you don't seem to understand is that your militant stance of 'local ethics don't matter' is just as much of an ethic as those that you're rebelling against. My question to you do you even know the reason behind those local ethics that you rebelling against? yes. do you. Ah, spoken like a man who is in over his head. I'm sorry that you don’t know anything about the local ethics you’re rebelling against. With your 'me first attitude' you sound like an incredibly lazy and self centered person who just stepped off the plastic. now is when i ask you to point out a local ethic i've broken. go. I never said you did. However you've stated that local ethics should be ignored. I find it very hard to believe that you would state such a thing so strongly and yet never have done so. Besides, I know some of the people you climb with and I know about your last boudering trip up on the North Shore. . . . (small world huh?) Prove it. Where did I go? What was noteworthy about the trip?
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 9:14 PM
Post #160 of 190
(3398 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Well it was noteworthy because of the copious amounts of chalk that you used. As to where you went I believe it was Sawmill. Then again the pictures looked a lot like Section 13. Edit due to bad typing. :(
(This post was edited by chadnsc on Jan 25, 2011, 9:22 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 9:29 PM
Post #161 of 190
(3378 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: Well it was noteworthy because of the copious amounts of chalk that you used. As to wear you went I belive it was Sawmill. Then again the pictures looked a lot like Section 13. Neato. I'd like to help you figure out which location it was, but I've never bouldered at the North Shore. I don't know of any close friends that would have bouldered up there either. As much fun as it has been trolling the most easily-trolled person on all of rc.com, you clearly think I'm someone else. As tempting as it is to play the part, I can't do that, and I'll have to end the last few pages of fun right here.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 9:36 PM
Post #162 of 190
(3372 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 9:45 PM
Post #164 of 190
(3358 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 9:47 PM
Post #165 of 190
(3354 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: As tempting as it is to play the part, I can't do that, and I'll have to end the last few pages of fun right here. Awwww, man! It is like I got sucked into a soap opera pilot, and now it's been suddenly canceled. My apologies. I really could have taken it to another level with this mistaken identity, but that's too irresponsible--even for me.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 9:49 PM
Post #166 of 190
(3346 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel Connor. We both know the newborn is your nephew.
(This post was edited by chadnsc on Jan 25, 2011, 9:50 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 9:52 PM
Post #167 of 190
(3340 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 9:58 PM
Post #168 of 190
(3329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama. True but your name is Joel Connor. You've climbed with Harvest, Pete, and Canadian Brian to name just a few. I know about your slip up with the chalk on Sawmill and Palisaide Head. Hell I was there for it.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Jan 25, 2011, 9:58 PM
Post #169 of 190
(3326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama. This is like watching the South Park episode about John Edward....
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 10:00 PM
Post #170 of 190
(3323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama. True but your name is Joel Connor. You've climbed with Harvest, Pete, and Canadian Brian to name just a few. I know about your slip up with the chalk on Sawmill and Palisaide Head. Hell I was there for it. No.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 10:01 PM
Post #171 of 190
(3323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
sbaclimber wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama. This is like watching the South Park episode about John Edward.... Actually I was using that as inspiration for this uh 'inventive discussion'. Seriously though, I do know spike, met the guy a few times and he's a good dude. I'd share a rope with him anytime.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Jan 25, 2011, 10:02 PM
Post #172 of 190
(3321 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama. True but your name is Joel Connor. You've climbed with Harvest, Pete, and Canadian Brian to name just a few. I know about your slip up with the chalk on Sawmill and Palisaide Head. Hell I was there for it. No. Hehehehe, keep on sayin' half truths there Joel.
|
|
|
|
|
olderic
Jan 25, 2011, 10:04 PM
Post #173 of 190
(3319 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539
|
Back on track - well I guess that depend on what teach you are interested in. Anyhoo - lets make a big assumption - assume that Lama is successful in what he is trying to do - rap bolts and sends. What will the results be? He will get lots of press - positive and negative. He will move on to the next big thing. The route will sit there and eventually get repeated. Ultimately it might get repeated in what most consider better style - skipping the bolts and placing trad gear instead. This has happened on a number of sport climbs at regular old sport areas and its probably inevitable that it will happen on alpine routes like this one would be. Probably be an evolutionary process - skip a few bolts - discover a variation that takes gear for part of a pitch and so on - until eventually the whole thing went on natural gear. A proud effort if it were to occur but most likely it would only get a footnote in history. Now assume instead that Lama - well we know it wouldn't be him - but a peer - spent years - decades maybe - with many attempts to really explore and get to know the face and eventually figured a way to link the whole thing on natural gear ground up. The actual climbing might be about the same (except the first case would still be marred by the chicken bolts) but in one case its just an interesting foot note and in the other it would be what most people would hail as one of the greatest feats in climbing history. Lama is robbing someone of that opportunity.
|
|
|
|
|
kaizen
Jan 25, 2011, 10:11 PM
Post #174 of 190
(3310 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2009
Posts: 154
|
olderic wrote: Back on track - well I guess that depend on what teach you are interested in. Anyhoo - lets make a big assumption - assume that Lama is successful in what he is trying to do - rap bolts and sends. What will the results be? He will get lots of press - positive and negative. He will move on to the next big thing. The route will sit there and eventually get repeated. Ultimately it might get repeated in what most consider better style - skipping the bolts and placing trad gear instead. This has happened on a number of sport climbs at regular old sport areas and its probably inevitable that it will happen on alpine routes like this one would be. Probably be an evolutionary process - skip a few bolts - discover a variation that takes gear for part of a pitch and so on - until eventually the whole thing went on natural gear. A proud effort if it were to occur but most likely it would only get a footnote in history. Now assume instead that Lama - well we know it wouldn't be him - but a peer - spent years - decades maybe - with many attempts to really explore and get to know the face and eventually figured a way to link the whole thing on natural gear ground up. The actual climbing might be about the same (except the first case would still be marred by the chicken bolts) but in one case its just an interesting foot note and in the other it would be what most people would hail as one of the greatest feats in climbing history. Lama is robbing someone of that opportunity. Well said.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Jan 25, 2011, 11:26 PM
Post #175 of 190
(3290 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: spikeddem wrote: chadnsc wrote: Oh I know who you are . . . . Joel. How's your newborn? You've also climbed at Palisade head with Forest, Phillip, and several others . . . . As for trolling . . . good for you but do you think I'd keep talking with someone as stupid as you claim to be if I didn't think you where simply providing some entertainment? I mean you've never acted this obtuse before but then again I suppose you could have just been drunk for the past few days. That's ok, you don't have to answer that. You can keep on thinking that you've trolled me good. It's better for your ego. A child? Definitely not me. Not that I know of. Oh come now Joel. We both know the newborn is your nephew. We live in Minnesota, not Alabama. True but your name is Joel Connor. You've climbed with Harvest, Pete, and Canadian Brian to name just a few. I know about your slip up with the chalk on Sawmill and Palisaide Head. Hell I was there for it. No. Hehehehe, keep on sayin' half truths there Joel. Just because I live near the cities and my first name is Joel, it does not mean I am Joel Connor. I am not. You and I have never met--not to my knowledge, anyway. haha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|