|
justroberto
Oct 4, 2010, 10:21 PM
Post #1 of 81
(7536 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend."
(This post was edited by justroberto on Oct 5, 2010, 5:52 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Oct 4, 2010, 10:26 PM
Post #2 of 81
(7519 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." I fully support this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 4, 2010, 10:28 PM
Post #3 of 81
(7513 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
dr_feelgood wrote: justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." I fully support this idea. Thirded. That place makes Rumney look cool.
|
|
|
|
|
rangerrob
Oct 4, 2010, 11:39 PM
Post #4 of 81
(7448 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641
|
Hey Roberto, how about we put a sticky note on your forehead that reads "this asshole thinks he will never make a mistake while climbing". I think that would be more appropriate. RR
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 5, 2010, 12:08 AM
Post #5 of 81
(7415 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
You could try, but I don't think it would stick for very long - I'm kind of greasy right now.
|
|
|
|
|
jeepnphreak
Oct 5, 2010, 12:14 AM
Post #6 of 81
(7408 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259
|
I have never climbed at the Gunks. But it sounds like a yourtube worthy shit show. Could make a week of it next season.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 5, 2010, 2:03 AM
Post #7 of 81
(7337 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
Very poor taste. God forbid that anyone you are close to are ever involved in an accident. If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. The Gunks proximity to the largest Metropolitan are in the US and it's plentiful bounty of beginner climbs opens itself up to it's share of accidents. It is what it is, but that doesn't mean you can't show some damn empathy! Josh
|
|
|
|
|
gblauer
Moderator
Oct 5, 2010, 2:13 AM
Post #8 of 81
(7319 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 4, 2002
Posts: 2824
|
rangerrob wrote: Hey Roberto, how about we put a sticky note on your forehead that reads "this asshole thinks he will never make a mistake while climbing". I think that would be more appropriate. RR You rock RR
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Oct 5, 2010, 2:33 AM
Post #9 of 81
(7291 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. God forbid that anyone you are close to are ever involved in an accident. If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. The Gunks proximity to the largest Metropolitan are in the US and it's plentiful bounty of beginner climbs opens itself up to it's share of accidents. It is what it is, but that doesn't mean you can't show some damn empathy! Josh Once again, I disagree. My parents have been the recipients of the 'call' that every loved one of a climber fears. The gunks is a dangerous place. People die there. Unfortunately, it is very rare that a serious injury or death is not directly attributable to the actions of an individual; the kindergarten phrase of everyone makes mistakes is potentially deadly when there are 6 million+ people crowding the economically viable mouth of the hudson river with a vague aspiration of being called a climber. Showing the varying levels of idiocy involved in accidents may prevent further accidents; or it might accomplish nothing. Getting into your car and driving to the gunks, given its popularity, means immortalization on the internet if you fuck up and get hurt. May as well confine it to one place in our little fantasy world here.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 5, 2010, 2:40 AM
Post #10 of 81
(7273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
dr_feelgood wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. God forbid that anyone you are close to are ever involved in an accident. If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. The Gunks proximity to the largest Metropolitan are in the US and it's plentiful bounty of beginner climbs opens itself up to it's share of accidents. It is what it is, but that doesn't mean you can't show some damn empathy! Josh Once again, I disagree. My parents have been the recipients of the 'call' that every loved one of a climber fears. The gunks is a dangerous place. People die there. Unfortunately, it is very rare that a serious injury or death is not directly attributable to the actions of an individual; the kindergarten phrase of everyone makes mistakes is potentially deadly when there are 6 million+ people crowding the economically viable mouth of the hudson river with a vague aspiration of being called a climber. Showing the varying levels of idiocy involved in accidents may prevent further accidents; or it might accomplish nothing. Getting into your car and driving to the gunks, given its popularity, means immortalization on the internet if you fuck up and get hurt. May as well confine it to one place in our little fantasy world here. I don't necessarily disagree with any of that, but each accident has a name. All of those people who make light of accidents or call out the idiocy of those invovled would NOT do that if it were their brother, best friend, child, etc. It is possible to learn from accidents without being a jackass. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Oct 5, 2010, 2:49 AM
Post #11 of 81
(7256 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
As much as I hate reading about accidents, I do find value in reflecting on an accident report. I do not find value in internet drama queens who like to kick a climber when he's down. Show some class.
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Oct 5, 2010, 3:18 AM
Post #12 of 81
(7229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
wonderwoman wrote: drama queens who like to kick a climber when he's down. Show some class. Do you think that commenting on the frequency of accidents amounts to kicking a climber when they're down? A number of posters who also objected to the OP acknowledge that that there are many accidents. Or have you, as others may have, assumed that the "asshole" thread would be about the same person as the "accidents" thread? If so, this says more about you than about the OP: at the best, this was his intent, and you apparently agree it's a valid statement since you made this assumption; at the worst, this wasn't his intent, and your assumption belies your feigned outrage.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Oct 5, 2010, 3:36 AM
Post #13 of 81
(7215 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
I am not outraged, never mind feigning outrage (whatever that means). I am pointing out that the OP is making fun of the accidents that have happened in the Gunks. Lame. That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 5, 2010, 3:41 AM
Post #14 of 81
(7212 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
theguy wrote: wonderwoman wrote: drama queens who like to kick a climber when he's down. Show some class. Do you think that commenting on the frequency of accidents amounts to kicking a climber when they're down? A number of posters who also objected to the OP acknowledge that that there are many accidents. He wasn't commenting. Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. He was making light of the accidents and calling those involved "assholes." Josh
|
|
|
|
|
mheyman
Oct 5, 2010, 3:51 AM
Post #15 of 81
(7199 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 607
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: He wasn't commenting. Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. He was making light of the accidents and calling those involved "assholes." Josh I'd say I agree, bit I don't need to. It's a fact, just read the OPs post at the top of the this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Oct 5, 2010, 6:34 AM
Post #16 of 81
(7108 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. He was making light of the accidents and calling those involved "assholes." Oh dear, oh dear. Let's take this one part at a time:
blueeyedclimber wrote: Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. As a reminder, the Accident & Incidents Analysis posting guidelines state the following: - "Keep it about the accident" - "Make your posts factual, and as detailed as possible" The OP's post was not about a specific accident, nor was it factual. Once again, general commentary does not belong in the A&IA forum, and the OP did the right thing in opening a separate thread in the General forum.
blueeyedclimber wrote: He was making light of the accidents And your point is? You want him to join your club for those who "like ...watching June bugs fly into things over and over again"?
blueeyedclimber wrote: He was ...calling those involved "assholes." In your rush to judgment, you seem to have neglected to actually read my full post. To make it easy, I'll repeat the part you apparently skipped: "Or have you, as others may have, assumed that the 'asshole' thread would be about the same person as the 'accidents' thread? If so, this says more about you than about the OP: at the best, this was his intent, and you apparently agree it's a valid statement since you made this assumption; at the worst, this wasn't his intent, and your assumption belies your feigned outrage.' It would appear that you have fallen victim to the same trap which caught wonderwoman... guess she wasn't wearing her bracelets today :) I'm beginning to think I should change my sig to "Shaper of Young Minds"...
|
|
|
|
|
t2stone
Oct 5, 2010, 9:31 AM
Post #17 of 81
(7076 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2007
Posts: 206
|
It's really cool to see "everyone" bonding and what not, I'm glad I "rapped" out of this mudslinging *hit~show last year P.S. tell jt5whteva I "really" miss him ... T.C.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 5, 2010, 12:04 PM
Post #18 of 81
(7022 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
theguy wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. He was making light of the accidents and calling those involved "assholes." Oh dear, oh dear. Let's take this one part at a time: blueeyedclimber wrote: Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. As a reminder, the Accident & Incidents Analysis posting guidelines state the following: - "Keep it about the accident" - "Make your posts factual, and as detailed as possible" The OP's post was not about a specific accident, nor was it factual. Once again, general commentary does not belong in the A&IA forum, and the OP did the right thing in opening a separate thread in the General forum. blueeyedclimber wrote: He was making light of the accidents And your point is? You want him to join your club for those who "like ...watching June bugs fly into things over and over again"? blueeyedclimber wrote: He was ...calling those involved "assholes." In your rush to judgment, you seem to have neglected to actually read my full post. To make it easy, I'll repeat the part you apparently skipped: "Or have you, as others may have, assumed that the 'asshole' thread would be about the same person as the 'accidents' thread? If so, this says more about you than about the OP: at the best, this was his intent, and you apparently agree it's a valid statement since you made this assumption; at the worst, this wasn't his intent, and your assumption belies your feigned outrage.' It would appear that you have fallen victim to the same trap which caught wonderwoman... guess she wasn't wearing her bracelets today :) I'm beginning to think I should change my sig to "Shaper of Young Minds"... I feel so flattered that you took the time to check out my profile. I could make some cute references to yours as well, but I woldn't be able to say much except that you have dreamy, rippling muscles and you own some orange shorts. You are merely speculating, as I am, of the OP's intent. I guess the only way to know for sure is to ask. So Roberto, were you making light of the recent accident in the Gunks and calling those involved assholes? There, GUY, was that so hard? Now, to sit back and see if he answers. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 5, 2010, 1:03 PM
Post #19 of 81
(6983 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
The only folks who are all butthurt are Gunksies. Hmm. I would agree that the OP is just making commentary on the relative frequency of shit-showing, and not seriously suggesting that all accidents get put in one thread (though it would be more convenient for my monday morning routine). Panteez....untwist!
(This post was edited by carabiner96 on Oct 5, 2010, 1:09 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
imnotclever
Oct 5, 2010, 1:19 PM
Post #20 of 81
(6963 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2003
Posts: 10000
|
justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." How is this confusing? Another.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Oct 5, 2010, 1:22 PM
Post #21 of 81
(6961 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." There is a sticky and it's called the Accidents and Analysis Forum. There is nothing about the climbing at the 'Gunks that is any more dangerous than at any other popular crag, just like there isn't anything specific to the grigri that makes climbing with one dangerous: it's the people, and each person makes a mistake that deserves independent analysis. Even if some accidents sound the same, they deserve separate threads so that we don't gloss over what not only did happen but what can continue to happen if it has happened before. I haven't yet seen an accident reported at the 'Gunks that couldn't happen at most other major crags. With regards to frequency, while I don't keep stats, I have seen a fair amount of accident threads out of the Red, New, Seneca, and Eldo, too. I assume the reason for this is proximity to population centers.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 5, 2010, 1:24 PM
Post #22 of 81
(6954 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." There is a sticky and it's called the Accidents and Analysis Forum. There is nothing about the climbing at the 'Gunks that is any more dangerous than at any other popular crag, just like there isn't anything specific to the grigri that makes climbing with one dangerous: it's the people, and each person makes a mistake that deserves independent analysis. Even if some accidents sound the same, they deserve separate threads so that we don't gloss over what not only did happen but what can continue to happen if it has happened before. I haven't yet seen an accident reported at the 'Gunks that couldn't happen at most other major crags. With regards to frequency, while I don't keep stats, I have seen a fair amount of accident threads out of the Red, New, Seneca, and Eldo, too. I assume the reason for this is proximity to population centers. So you agree the area deserves an 'Assholes of the Gunks' sticky?
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 5, 2010, 1:30 PM
Post #23 of 81
(6948 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: theguy wrote: wonderwoman wrote: drama queens who like to kick a climber when he's down. Show some class. Do you think that commenting on the frequency of accidents amounts to kicking a climber when they're down? A number of posters who also objected to the OP acknowledge that that there are many accidents. He wasn't commenting. Comments could have gone in the original accident thread. He was making light of the accidents and calling those involved "assholes." Josh You've missed the boat, dude. The asshole thread was a comment on the increasing number of "listen to what this asshole did to me this weekend, isn't that terrible?" threads.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Oct 5, 2010, 1:36 PM
Post #24 of 81
(6933 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
carabiner96 wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." There is a sticky and it's called the Accidents and Analysis Forum. There is nothing about the climbing at the 'Gunks that is any more dangerous than at any other popular crag, just like there isn't anything specific to the grigri that makes climbing with one dangerous: it's the people, and each person makes a mistake that deserves independent analysis. Even if some accidents sound the same, they deserve separate threads so that we don't gloss over what not only did happen but what can continue to happen if it has happened before. I haven't yet seen an accident reported at the 'Gunks that couldn't happen at most other major crags. With regards to frequency, while I don't keep stats, I have seen a fair amount of accident threads out of the Red, New, Seneca, and Eldo, too. I assume the reason for this is proximity to population centers. So you agree the area deserves an 'Assholes of the Gunks' sticky? so long as I can be the star.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 5, 2010, 1:39 PM
Post #25 of 81
(6928 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." There is a sticky and it's called the Accidents and Analysis Forum. There is nothing about the climbing at the 'Gunks that is any more dangerous than at any other popular crag, just like there isn't anything specific to the grigri that makes climbing with one dangerous: it's the people, and each person makes a mistake that deserves independent analysis. Even if some accidents sound the same, they deserve separate threads so that we don't gloss over what not only did happen but what can continue to happen if it has happened before. I haven't yet seen an accident reported at the 'Gunks that couldn't happen at most other major crags. With regards to frequency, while I don't keep stats, I have seen a fair amount of accident threads out of the Red, New, Seneca, and Eldo, too. I assume the reason for this is proximity to population centers. So you agree the area deserves an 'Assholes of the Gunks' sticky? so long as I can be the star. Aww, you'll always be my asshole! Seriously, though, I can see a sticky "This weekend's asshole award goes to..." Doesn't have to be limited to the Gunks, and would be a favorite Monday morning read. Even better when both parties happen to be rc.commers...DRAMZ!
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Oct 5, 2010, 1:50 PM
Post #26 of 81
(2288 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
carabiner96 wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." There is a sticky and it's called the Accidents and Analysis Forum. There is nothing about the climbing at the 'Gunks that is any more dangerous than at any other popular crag, just like there isn't anything specific to the grigri that makes climbing with one dangerous: it's the people, and each person makes a mistake that deserves independent analysis. Even if some accidents sound the same, they deserve separate threads so that we don't gloss over what not only did happen but what can continue to happen if it has happened before. I haven't yet seen an accident reported at the 'Gunks that couldn't happen at most other major crags. With regards to frequency, while I don't keep stats, I have seen a fair amount of accident threads out of the Red, New, Seneca, and Eldo, too. I assume the reason for this is proximity to population centers. So you agree the area deserves an 'Assholes of the Gunks' sticky? so long as I can be the star. Aww, you'll always be my asshole! Seriously, though, I can see a sticky "This weekend's asshole award goes to..." Doesn't have to be limited to the Gunks, and would be a favorite Monday morning read. Even better when both parties happen to be rc.commers...DRAMZ! I admit that there does seem to be a market gap for this kind of fodder on this site. It would be amazing if it lasted more than two pages before being banished to the campground, though.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Oct 5, 2010, 1:55 PM
Post #27 of 81
(2284 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
It would be damn entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
sethg
Oct 5, 2010, 1:55 PM
Post #28 of 81
(2284 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2006
Posts: 134
|
Count me as a Gunkie who is not offended. I thought the original post was funny. It would have been in better taste if it had just been about the "asshole" threads and not about the accidents. But I understood the OP to be talking about the frequency of accident and asshole threads and not making fun of any particular tragedy at the Gunks. Last year's Accidents in North American Mountaineering actually made a point of remarking on how very few fatal accidents have occurred at the Gunks over its entire history. So on that level you could say the Gunks is an uncommonly safe area. On the other hand, we all know what a freakshow the place can be on peak weekends, and plenty of people are lucky to avoid more serious injuries from their very basic mistakes. There's no reason to be defensive about it. I do think this general profile I've sketched of the Gunks (few fatalities, many basic errors) would apply to many other crowded crags as well. It certainly seems to apply to Eldo, to name one example. There are numerous high-end dangerous routes there but all the accidents (many fatal) seem to occur on the moderate trade routes.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 5, 2010, 2:06 PM
Post #29 of 81
(2270 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. Possibly - about half the people here seem to think so. blueeyedclimber wrote: God forbid that anyone you are close to are {sic} ever involved in an accident. What makes you think no one I know has been?blueeyedclimber wrote: If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. Quite true, and it's exactly this ignorance that seems to be contributing to a lot of accidents 'round those parts. But you seem to be implying that I hold that viewpoint, which I can assure you isn't the case.
|
|
|
|
|
stevebontes
Oct 5, 2010, 2:16 PM
Post #30 of 81
(2259 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 30, 2010
Posts: 21
|
well i have one more thing to say about chalk,,, just kidding,,, if you guys payed as much attention to giving new guys advice or at least looking to give advice instead of giving them shit, as you give the attention to accidents,,, mabey there would be less accidents to read about ,we can all learn from others mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
darkgift06
Oct 5, 2010, 4:18 PM
Post #31 of 81
(2229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 16, 2009
Posts: 492
|
I agree we need a Gunks sticky, But it should be in the regional discussion area, or the US East coast area.. & not every post under Trip reports weekend warrior should be from the Gunks..
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 5, 2010, 4:21 PM
Post #33 of 81
(2226 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: carabiner96 wrote: The only folks who are all butthurt are Gunksies. Hmm. I would say that I have more investment because it's the Gunks, but I have made other claims out the jackassery of people towards victims in other areas. BTW, Rumney sucks! Josh You think I was getting at something else? Hehe! Can't complain, I always have a good time at Rumney, but I think it's more because I always climb with good peeps. I get my rock boners over in the Daks.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Oct 5, 2010, 4:29 PM
Post #34 of 81
(2222 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
darkgift06 wrote: I agree we need a Gunks sticky, But it should be in the regional discussion area, or the US East coast area.. & not every post under Trip reports weekend warrior should be from the Gunks.. that's just the way it turned out. TRs from other regions not only get occassionally posted there, but are more than welcomed, too.
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 5, 2010, 4:29 PM
Post #35 of 81
(2221 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
justroberto wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. Possibly - about half the people here seem to think so. blueeyedclimber wrote: God forbid that anyone you are close to are {sic} ever involved in an accident. What makes you think no one I know has been? blueeyedclimber wrote: If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. Quite true, and it's exactly this ignorance that seems to be contributing to a lot of accidents 'round those parts. But you seem to be implying that I hold that viewpoint, which I can assure you isn't the case. Very well then. If I have missed the boat then I am fully prepared to jump off the dock. I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. As far as the other threads you are referencing (i.e. "this jerk did this now agree with me and sooth my whinyness), I agree wholeheartedly). Josh
|
|
|
|
|
jsh
Oct 5, 2010, 5:12 PM
Post #37 of 81
(2176 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2003
Posts: 118
|
theguy wrote: wonderwoman wrote: drama queens who like to kick a climber when he's down. Show some class. Or have you, as others may have, assumed that the "asshole" thread would be about the same person as the "accidents" thread? It should be obvious that a family member, or just some climber who isn't acclimated to the usual pecking order of "butt hurting" drama around here, -might- read the title of this thread and click it, looking for info about the recent accident. And yes, the OP could easily be read by that person and seem aimed at this weekend's accident, and calling him an asshole - as kicking that particular climber after he'd taken the 100-ft ride. For that reason, you or a moderator should strongly consider revising the title, so it is not clicked by the unwary from the front page.
(This post was edited by jsh on Oct 5, 2010, 5:14 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
welle
Oct 5, 2010, 5:24 PM
Post #38 of 81
(2162 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2008
Posts: 212
|
stevebontes wrote: well i have one more thing to say about chalk,,, just kidding,,, I'd like to add one more thread about marking the middle of the rope ;) Add me to the list of the Gunkies who didn't find the OP offensive. The thing with the Gunks is it has more weekend warrior type of climbers (myself included) that all they do is dick around interwebs on weekdays, so more stuff gets posted/reported. Other places people are either busy climbing or actually working.
|
|
|
|
|
sknowlton
Oct 5, 2010, 5:31 PM
Post #39 of 81
(2155 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 99
|
A little bit of context: http://www.mountainproject.com/v/general_climbing/climbing_attitudes/106911417
|
|
|
|
|
lena_chita
Moderator
Oct 5, 2010, 5:33 PM
Post #40 of 81
(2151 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087
|
curt wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Seriously, though, I can see a sticky "This weekend's asshole award goes to..." Well, there's obviously going to be intense competition. I want to be one of the judges. Curt If you think you have a good idea, chances are someone else has thought of it first. I believe the redriveclimbing "ongoing weekend idiot report" thread is well into over 20 pages... and that's JUST RRG.
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
Oct 5, 2010, 5:48 PM
Post #41 of 81
(2134 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
curt wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Seriously, though, I can see a sticky "This weekend's asshole award goes to..." Well, there's obviously going to be intense competition. I want to be one of the judges. Curt I want to sit in the audience with a giant bucket of popcorn and watch the magic happen
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 5, 2010, 5:53 PM
Post #42 of 81
(2123 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
jsh wrote: theguy wrote: wonderwoman wrote: drama queens who like to kick a climber when he's down. Show some class. Or have you, as others may have, assumed that the "asshole" thread would be about the same person as the "accidents" thread? It should be obvious that a family member, or just some climber who isn't acclimated to the usual pecking order of "butt hurting" drama around here, -might- read the title of this thread and click it, looking for info about the recent accident. And yes, the OP could easily be read by that person and seem aimed at this weekend's accident, and calling him an asshole - as kicking that particular climber after he'd taken the 100-ft ride. For that reason, you or a moderator should strongly consider revising the title, so it is not clicked by the unwary from the front page. Fair enough. I've changed it to hopefully mitigate that confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Oct 5, 2010, 5:56 PM
Post #43 of 81
(2117 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
heh. I thought it was funny.
|
|
|
|
|
iron106
Oct 5, 2010, 6:09 PM
Post #44 of 81
(2095 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 7, 2008
Posts: 213
|
lena_chita wrote: curt wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Seriously, though, I can see a sticky "This weekend's asshole award goes to..." Well, there's obviously going to be intense competition. I want to be one of the judges. Curt If you think you have a good idea, chances are someone else has thought of it first. I believe the redriveclimbing "ongoing weekend idiot report" thread is well into over 20 pages... and that's JUST RRG. 2011 Newest climbing book. Assholes in North American Mountaineering
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 5, 2010, 6:21 PM
Post #45 of 81
(2082 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. Josh It's an interesting phenomenon. Here in Austin there are a couple hundred climbs in the city limits. On an average weekday, there are probably 50-100 climbers out on the Greenbelt. On a weekend, considerably more, so many of them gumbies. People yelling, paying more attention to their dogs than belaying, shiny new gear everywhere, incompetent belayers, clueless leaders - it's a real shitshow. It's a recipe for disaster, and yet, there's been one serious accident in the past year. I'm sure it's partially attributable to being mostly clip-ups with sport anchor at the top of every climb, but there's got to be a little more to it.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Oct 5, 2010, 6:42 PM
Post #46 of 81
(2059 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
there's been at least 2 deaths in squamish this year and likely many more accidents ... accident are all fun and games till they happen to you ... and if you dont believe they can happen to you ... well ... i got a bridge to sell u
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 5, 2010, 6:46 PM
Post #47 of 81
(2056 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
justroberto wrote: It's an interesting phenomenon. Here in Austin there are a couple hundred climbs in the city limits. On an average weekday, there are probably 50-100 climbers out on the Greenbelt. On a weekend, considerably more, so many of them gumbies. People yelling, paying more attention to their dogs than belaying, shiny new gear everywhere, incompetent belayers, clueless leaders - it's a real shitshow. It's a recipe for disaster, and yet, there's been one serious accident in the past year. I'm sure it's partially attributable to being mostly clip-ups with sport anchor at the top of every climb, but there's got to be a little more to it. I think it has a lot to do with the preparedness of the climber. Most climbers nowadays come right from a gym. What does the gym prepare climbers for? It will make them strong. Maybe they learned to sport lead in the gym. This doesn't totally prepare them for outside, but it transfer fairly well to sport climbing. You have obvious routes. Pre-placed harware. Single pitch. There is really only a few new variables to worry about. Now, picture that same gym climber coming to the Gunks. Sandbagged grades. Runouts. Sometimes difficult route finding. Sometimes tricky placements. Easy climbs next to hard climbs that you may now find yourself accidentally on. Loose rocks to knock off at the top. Roofs that make communication difficult. All with the crowds of a gym environment. Just something to think about. Josh
(This post was edited by blueeyedclimber on Oct 5, 2010, 6:47 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
ensonik
Oct 5, 2010, 7:25 PM
Post #48 of 81
(2027 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 15, 2009
Posts: 134
|
bearbreeder wrote: accident are all fun and games till they happen to you ... No one hinted to the contrary.
bearbreeder wrote: and if you dont believe they can happen to you No one said that, nor does anyone here believe it.
bearbreeder wrote: i got a bridge to sell u Clever expression. Witty. Also, the way you spelled 'u' instead of 'you', in the process saving 2 key strokes ... clever as well. Combined with the bullshit smug self-righteousness, it makes you sound very educated and smart. Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 5, 2010, 8:47 PM
Post #51 of 81
(2731 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
All of that is true, and yet most of those accidents still seem to be from belaying errors and miscommunication, not gear/headspace/routefinding issues. Honestly, I hope the recent accidents there are just an anomaly and everything mellows out there again. Anyways, thanks for the level-headed response.
|
|
|
|
|
rangerrob
Oct 6, 2010, 3:24 AM
Post #52 of 81
(2677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641
|
I only know of one accident at the Gunks in the recent past, and that's the one that prompted this thread. What are you refering to?
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 6, 2010, 12:59 PM
Post #53 of 81
(2645 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
rangerrob wrote: I only know of one accident at the Gunks in the recent past, and that's the one that prompted this thread. What are you refering to? Any of the three or four (maybe five?? I can't keep track, it's sad) in the last month or two, I'm sure. Too be fair, it's been a bad summer in general, maybe they're all just smooshing together in my aging brain.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Oct 6, 2010, 2:40 PM
Post #55 of 81
(2601 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
WHERE IS MAJID WHEN YOU NEED HIM?!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Oct 6, 2010, 2:42 PM
Post #56 of 81
(2596 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Thanks, I was feeling way too lazy.
|
|
|
|
|
zchandran
Oct 6, 2010, 3:28 PM
Post #57 of 81
(2576 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 120
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. What might actually make a difference is posting accident reports at the crag itself. Make up an 8.5x11" flyer for each accident (including the injuries) and put it up on the bulletin board. The casual climbers usually have no idea how many accidents there really are, and specifically how many are caused by miscommunication. Earlier this year I saw a guy get to the top of a sport single pitch, grab the chains, and before even clipping in shout "I'm on the anchor!". His belayer who was not in line of sight immediately took him off belay. What's scary is that after I told the belayer, and the climber made it down safely, they just laughed it off and went on about their day.
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Oct 6, 2010, 3:55 PM
Post #58 of 81
(2559 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: you have dreamy, rippling muscles Why thank you sir, I was getting a little jealous of all the man-love Sharma gets on rc.com. PM me later, or just call my 900 number
blueeyedclimber wrote: merely speculating, as I am, of the OP's intent. I guess the only way to know for sure is to ask...There,...was that so hard? Apparently harder for you than rushing to judgment first
imnotclever wrote: How is this confusing? Another. Ding! Ding! Even someone who's not clever could figure it out
justroberto wrote: You've missed the boat, dude. The asshole thread was a comment on the increasing number of "listen to what this asshole did to me this weekend, isn't that terrible?" threads. ...and was right. So, Mr. Sinatra, your reading comprehension seems poor, and you rush to judgment before asking questions. I really hope that "shaper of young minds" doesn't refer to teaching... if so, consider a new career with the police: they need folks like you
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
Oct 6, 2010, 5:04 PM
Post #60 of 81
(2520 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
happiegrrrl wrote: iron106 wrote: 2011 Newest climbing book. Assholes in North American Mountaineering This WOULD be a funny read. As for the dude who fell this last weekend - best wishes to them for a quick recovery. As for the person's family reading the thread(which they very well may) - I guess the fact that the person wasn't more seriously injured or killed probably makes it less difficult, should they come across this thread. Unfortunately, even in situations where people have died, some asshole from the internet is sure to make a comment such as being rebutted here. Maybe the 2012 book could be "Assholes of the Internet Prattling On Over Accidents in North American Mountaineering" Doesn't have the same ring to it
|
|
|
|
|
BobfartsII
Oct 6, 2010, 5:55 PM
Post #61 of 81
(2496 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 18, 2009
Posts: 17
|
justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." Well if they bolted all the boulder problems with bolts spaced about every 3 feet to make it feel like, ohhh I don't know, maybe reimers ranch, then maybe this wouldn't be such a problem and we would all be badass climbers like you.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 6, 2010, 6:26 PM
Post #62 of 81
(2476 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. Agreed. Let's do it. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Oct 6, 2010, 6:32 PM
Post #63 of 81
(2465 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." Just as I was beginning to think that the art of trolling was dead. Very nice work. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 6, 2010, 7:34 PM
Post #64 of 81
(2417 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
theguy wrote: ...and was right. So, Mr. Sinatra, your reading comprehension seems poor, and you rush to judgment before asking questions. I really hope that "shaper of young minds" doesn't refer to teaching... if so, consider a new career with the police: they need folks like you Well, Roberto did say he was talking more about the assholes who get butthurtz and want everyone to console them. I just have one question. Why would he title the thread Gunks Accident this Weekend? He either is lying or as Jay suggests, is trolling. Probably the latter. As for shaping young minds, why can't I just stay in teaching and pull out my gun. In fact, that sounds fairly effective. Just to sum up: My reading comprehension is poor due to the fact that I thought Roberto was referencing the Gunks Accident this Weekend in a thread titled "Gunks Accident this Weekend." Does that sound right? Josh
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Oct 6, 2010, 7:58 PM
Post #65 of 81
(2395 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: theguy wrote: ...and was right. So, Mr. Sinatra, your reading comprehension seems poor, and you rush to judgment before asking questions. I really hope that "shaper of young minds" doesn't refer to teaching... if so, consider a new career with the police: they need folks like you Well, Roberto did say he was talking more about the assholes who get butthurtz and want everyone to console them. I just have one question. Why would he title the thread Gunks Accident this Weekend? He either is lying or as Jay suggests, is trolling. Probably the latter. As for shaping young minds, why can't I just stay in teaching and pull out my gun. In fact, that sounds fairly effective. Just to sum up: My reading comprehension is poor due to the fact that I thought Roberto was referencing the Gunks Accident this Weekend in a thread titled "Gunks Accident this Weekend." Does that sound right? Josh He changed the title to "Gunks accident every weekend" at some point.
|
|
|
|
|
rangerrob
Oct 6, 2010, 8:13 PM
Post #66 of 81
(2381 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 8, 2003
Posts: 641
|
Jake, thanksfor that accident list, but you can take the knuckleheads who needed to be rescued off of Madame G's off that list. That WAS NOT an accident. That was irresponsible behavior. No one was hurt. No one was in danger of becoming hurt. They just didn't want to figure it out for themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
ensonik
Oct 6, 2010, 9:49 PM
Post #67 of 81
(2327 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 15, 2009
Posts: 134
|
rangerrob wrote: Jake, thanksfor that accident list, but you can take the knuckleheads who needed to be rescued off of Madame G's off that list. That WAS NOT an accident. That was irresponsible behavior. No one was hurt. No one was in danger of becoming hurt. They just didn't want to figure it out for themselves. You never did give us the full story. Right about now seems appropriate. http://www.rockclimbing.com/...post=2387988#2387988
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Oct 6, 2010, 10:14 PM
Post #68 of 81
(2313 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
rangerrob wrote: Jake, thanksfor that accident list, but you can take the knuckleheads who needed to be rescued off of Madame G's off that list. That WAS NOT an accident. That was irresponsible behavior. No one was hurt. No one was in danger of becoming hurt. They just didn't want to figure it out for themselves. They called 911, kept ambulances and rescuers at the Slime lot until 1am. I think it still counts. and yes you owe us a story dammit ;)
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Oct 6, 2010, 11:22 PM
Post #69 of 81
(2286 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
BobfartsII wrote: justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." Well if they bolted all the boulder problems with bolts spaced about every 3 feet to make it feel like, ohhh I don't know, maybe reimers ranch, then maybe this wouldn't be such a problem and we would all be badass climbers like you. I wouldn't know. I climb at erock far more often, which you might have picked up on had you looked at my avatar.
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Oct 7, 2010, 12:30 AM
Post #70 of 81
(2263 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
zchandran wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. What might actually make a difference is posting accident reports at the crag itself. Make up an 8.5x11" flyer for each accident (including the injuries) and put it up on the bulletin board. The casual climbers usually have no idea how many accidents there really are, and specifically how many are caused by miscommunication. Jesus fucking christ man! Do you want to be personally responsible for the destruction of the forests with the amount of paper that would require?
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Oct 7, 2010, 1:39 AM
Post #71 of 81
(2227 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
dr_feelgood wrote: zchandran wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. What might actually make a difference is posting accident reports at the crag itself. Make up an 8.5x11" flyer for each accident (including the injuries) and put it up on the bulletin board. The casual climbers usually have no idea how many accidents there really are, and specifically how many are caused by miscommunication. Jesus fucking christ man! Do you want to be personally responsible for the destruction of the forests with the amount of paper that would require? How bout we get a text then. Mayor Menino texted all of Boston last Spring when we had that boil water order. Why can't the Mohonk Preserve text us all when there's been an accident? Josh
|
|
|
|
|
erisspirit
Oct 7, 2010, 1:57 AM
Post #72 of 81
(2219 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: zchandran wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. What might actually make a difference is posting accident reports at the crag itself. Make up an 8.5x11" flyer for each accident (including the injuries) and put it up on the bulletin board. The casual climbers usually have no idea how many accidents there really are, and specifically how many are caused by miscommunication. Jesus fucking christ man! Do you want to be personally responsible for the destruction of the forests with the amount of paper that would require? How bout we get a text then. Mayor Menino texted all of Boston last Spring when we had that boil water order. Why can't the Mohonk Preserve text us all when there's been an accident? Josh my inbox isn't big enough
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Oct 7, 2010, 4:16 AM
Post #73 of 81
(2184 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
erisspirit wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: zchandran wrote: blueeyedclimber wrote: I don't deny that the Gunks gets it's fair share of accidents (a lot more than I would like). But with the sheer amount of people we are talking about here, you just can't compare it to most areas. People that don't frequent it don't understand. A lot of people don't go there for that very reason. I happen to LOVE the climbing so I am willing to put up with it. What might actually make a difference is posting accident reports at the crag itself. Make up an 8.5x11" flyer for each accident (including the injuries) and put it up on the bulletin board. The casual climbers usually have no idea how many accidents there really are, and specifically how many are caused by miscommunication. Jesus fucking christ man! Do you want to be personally responsible for the destruction of the forests with the amount of paper that would require? How bout we get a text then. Mayor Menino texted all of Boston last Spring when we had that boil water order. Why can't the Mohonk Preserve text us all when there's been an accident? Josh my inbox isn't big enough There are precedents for public accident posting, though with less detail, in other sports: Little Sahara in Utah, an OHV area, has a sign at the entrance with the # of accidents so far that day or week (can't remember which, but think it's the former). Few trees used to make the sign, but then they just change the number.
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Oct 7, 2010, 5:56 AM
Post #74 of 81
(2168 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. God forbid that anyone you are close to are ever involved in an accident. If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. The Gunks proximity to the largest Metropolitan are in the US and it's plentiful bounty of beginner climbs opens itself up to it's share of accidents. It is what it is, but that doesn't mean you can't show some damn empathy! Josh I never been there but your point is pretty interesting . its worth monitoring to know the causes and I wonder if the nearby cities offer lots of climbing gyms which eventually send a lot of these graduate n00bs to gunk to test their skills.
|
|
|
|
|
TradEddie
Oct 7, 2010, 3:53 PM
Post #75 of 81
(2105 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 164
|
How about something like the climber's memorial below Mt. Cook in New Zealand? It's an elegant memorial, and the most sobering warning I've ever seen. Way too many plaques on that base. http://www.pbase.com/...ge/64074291/original
|
|
|
|
|
welle
Oct 7, 2010, 5:39 PM
Post #76 of 81
(1322 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2008
Posts: 212
|
TradEddie wrote: How about something like the climber's memorial below Mt. Cook in New Zealand? It's an elegant memorial, and the most sobering warning I've ever seen. Way too many plaques on that base. http://www.pbase.com/...ge/64074291/original don't see any elegance - that thing is ugly and is ruining the landscape!
|
|
|
|
|
olderic
Oct 7, 2010, 7:36 PM
Post #77 of 81
(1290 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539
|
Just go to the cemetary in Cham or Zermatt.
|
|
|
|
|
happiegrrrl
Oct 10, 2010, 5:45 PM
Post #78 of 81
(1200 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 4660
|
So...trailwork got canceled today and I am online in the Uberfall(What - you didn't know the Trapps has free wifi?*) Anyway, yesterday climbing in the Nears(or waiting for my friend and another to get down from a climb, more aptly). i LOOKE DOWN THE CLIFF AT A GUY BELAYING ON....ooops, accidental caps lock..... Yellow Ridge. The belayer is taking up slack..... LOTS of slack! I do a double take, and see the lead rope has a HUGE amount of slack, TOUCHING the ground. The guy is slowly and methodically taking up slack.... He takes up AT LEAST what seems like THIRTY FEET. And then he stops. And the rope slack is STILL not off the ground. I guess his hands musta got tired.(trango cinch, I think - a red sort of device, but I'm not sure what). So, after a bit of time, he begins taking up again. EASILY another 15-20 feet until the rope is at what would be a proper amount of slack for a lead belay..... I really cannot imagine how on eart..... The best I can figure is the dud clipped the device into the wrong end of the rope.....and was taking out slack from that end. THANKFULLY the dud somehow became cognizant, because it was NOT long after the guy got the right tension before the leader asked for Take(I am guessing - didn't hear the command, but did see that the belayer now had tension from the top of the rope as if the climber was weighting it). Now - part II So, my friend is seconding on Grand Central and calls over to someone down the crag(in the vicinity of the team abpve, although this conversation occurred before I had noticed the belayer with .....copious amounts of slack in the system. He says "Hey - are you guys on Yellow Ride?" To which the dude says "We're *off* Yellow Ridge, but we know that(and then says they weren't sure where to go and decided to do whatever they were doing). At that point, my friend goes - "Oh..... Umm, okay." and gets back to his own climb. So, they finish up the route, walk off, and when they get back, and the subject comes up. My friend goes - "well, I was more worried about the belay he was getting. Did you SEE it?" To which I said yes. He says something about the belayer "at least having the Figure 8 threaded correctly." I say "I thought it was a Cinch. Didn't look like an 8!" He goes "Was he wearing(description of clothing) and was his hair(description of hair)?" I said "No, this guy was wearing (description....). So - it turns out there were TWO un-f-ing-believeable belays going on.... The one I mentioned before, and this one, which included: The belayer running the rope through the *, and then taking a bight of rope FROM THE LEAD END into his teeth, and then feeding more rope with his other hand. I kid you not. * It doesn't. I have mobile broadband, and this is the retaining wall by the Gerdie block is the nearest place to my home I get a cel signal.)
|
|
|
|
|
ClimbClimb
Oct 10, 2010, 6:14 PM
Post #79 of 81
(1186 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 5, 2009
Posts: 389
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: Very poor taste. God forbid that anyone you are close to are ever involved in an accident. If you think shit can't happen to you then you are living in ignorance. Well put.
|
|
|
|
|
ClimbClimb
Oct 10, 2010, 6:16 PM
Post #80 of 81
(1186 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 5, 2009
Posts: 389
|
dr_feelgood wrote: Unfortunately, it is very rare that a serious injury or death is not directly attributable to the actions of an individual; Yes, like climbing a cliff -- or really, anything higher than stepstool. That, in most peoples' minds, is the direct cause of all climbing deaths.
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Oct 10, 2010, 9:26 PM
Post #81 of 81
(1160 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
justroberto wrote: Can we make this sticky? Every Monday people can come in and report on what happened the previous weekend. Then there can be another sticky for "Gunks Asshole This Weekend." won't work because people take things too seriously. I wonder how many people here who lambast you for making light of the situation giggled when they heard of the former CEO of Segway dying on one? What was that thing in MASH? Rule #1. People will die climbing Rule #2. Posting shit on the internet won't change #1 How crazy is it that in our sport death and being seriously maimed is 'normal?' A pitcher for the Angels died from a drunk driver plowing into him and southern California news radio went ballistic over it. 2009 had so many amazing and talented climbers pass away yet here we are still doing it. We all have our own ways to deal with this nonsense. The worst case scenario in making light of the insane number of accidents happening at the Gunks is that someone will be offended, but maybe (like double cross) it helps just one person to take it a bit more seriously. its our stupid ass society that tells us that people aren't allowed to offend us, that our feelings are special and we are unique snowflakes. Shut the fuck up, no one is special, if you want to live a long and healthy life don't go climbing, sit in your crib and play warcraft. Obesity is a disease that takes years to kill you, you will have a while to be safe. Or, understand that you are in a sport where people get fucked up, and deal with that with some reality and not this propensity to lash out irrationally at dumb shit people say on the internet. disclaimer - I am a dumbass and say dumb shit all the time, so what do I know anyway.
(This post was edited by quiteatingmysteak on Oct 10, 2010, 9:27 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|