|
j_ung
Feb 14, 2012, 8:50 PM
Post #3202 of 3255
(8867 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Guess the route name.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Feb 14, 2012, 8:53 PM
Post #3203 of 3255
(8865 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Sweet.
|
|
|
|
|
rnevius
Feb 15, 2012, 3:39 PM
Post #3205 of 3255
(8774 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 1, 2011
Posts: 58
|
standing at da base o Mt Whitney, lookin at Mt. Russel. We climbed the 5.9 dyhedral to the right of the shadow....I also did da FishHook Arete on a different trip---5.8 I belive we went there in August a couple o years ago. Always a pleasure and a blast in da Sierras
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...t_Russell_51610.html
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Feb 19, 2012, 2:22 PM
Post #3206 of 3255
(8648 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
Some photos inspire you and make you want to climb there. Others...
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Feb 21, 2012, 12:00 AM
Post #3207 of 3255
(8543 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
They just make it so easy.
|
|
|
|
|
camrock
Feb 22, 2012, 2:31 PM
Post #3208 of 3255
(8454 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 19, 2012
Posts: 18
|
This is some hilarious shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Feb 26, 2012, 4:43 PM
Post #3209 of 3255
(8315 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
General question for the rules committee:
I have, from my last trip, several blurry butt shots. Normally I just delete them. I know that self posting of photos results in "you know what", but what is there a crime of blurry photo trolling?
And, can some of the committee members please give examples from their own collection of photos they would normally delete, but would post up as trolling photos. If such trolling was not a crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Mar 3, 2012, 8:17 AM
Post #3211 of 3255
(8075 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
Yeah, Uggs are a crime that should be punished by stoning or some similar sharia like stuff, but other than that its not that bad (maybe the compression, but that might be my mobile provider, so i cant judge on that).
Also did you just upload it for this thread?
Toastus_in_machinaes question has not been answered yet, but i'd suggest that this is a privilege only for those that have already ridiculed enough pics, and now should proof that they can take the abuse themselvs
qwert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Mar 3, 2012, 1:50 PM
Post #3213 of 3255
(8049 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
qwert wrote: Yeah, Uggs are a crime that should be punished by stoning or some similar sharia like stuff, but other than that its not that bad (maybe the compression, but that might be my mobile provider, so i cant judge on that). Also did you just upload it for this thread? Toastus_in_machinaes question has not been answered yet, but i'd suggest that this is a privilege only for those that have already ridiculed enough pics, and now should proof that they can take the abuse themselvs qwert
While I deeply respect your opinion on photos, for fashion, you must know, that that would imply stoning this:
http://www.youtube.com/...&feature=related
And, frankly, that would be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Mar 3, 2012, 4:22 PM
Post #3214 of 3255
(8016 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: qwert wrote: Yeah, Uggs are a crime that should be punished by stoning or some similar sharia like stuff, but other than that its not that bad (maybe the compression, but that might be my mobile provider, so i cant judge on that). Also did you just upload it for this thread? Toastus_in_machinaes question has not been answered yet, but i'd suggest that this is a privilege only for those that have already ridiculed enough pics, and now should proof that they can take the abuse themselvs qwert While I deeply respect your opinion on photos, for fashion, you must know, that that would imply stoning this: http://www.youtube.com/...&feature=related And, frankly, that would be wrong.
But no need for stoning anyways, because looking at the colors in the video, she already is stoned.
qwert
|
|
|
|
|
kobaz
Mar 3, 2012, 4:56 PM
Post #3215 of 3255
(8007 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726
|
qwert wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: qwert wrote: Yeah, Uggs are a crime that should be punished by stoning or some similar sharia like stuff, but other than that its not that bad (maybe the compression, but that might be my mobile provider, so i cant judge on that). Also did you just upload it for this thread? Toastus_in_machinaes question has not been answered yet, but i'd suggest that this is a privilege only for those that have already ridiculed enough pics, and now should proof that they can take the abuse themselvs qwert While I deeply respect your opinion on photos, for fashion, you must know, that that would imply stoning this: http://www.youtube.com/...&feature=related And, frankly, that would be wrong. Those arent uggs. Its something else (equally horrible). But no need for stoning anyways, because looking at the colors in the video, she already is stoned. qwert
haha.... and yeah it was uploaded just for the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Mar 6, 2012, 3:48 AM
Post #3216 of 3255
(7926 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
Quadruple but shot and misspelled...
"rapelling; just about sums up my experience hahaha"
(This post was edited by acorneau on Mar 6, 2012, 3:49 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
kobaz
Mar 6, 2012, 4:30 AM
Post #3217 of 3255
(7907 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726
|
acorneau wrote: Quadruple but shot and misspelled... "rapelling; just about sums up my experience hahaha" [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/481481-largest_247005_176125435777953_100001414932306_472158_5560201_n.jpg[/image]
At least the female has a callipygian.
|
|
|
|
|
j_ung
Mar 7, 2012, 1:34 AM
Post #3218 of 3255
(7818 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
kobaz wrote: acorneau wrote: Quadruple but shot and misspelled... "rapelling; just about sums up my experience hahaha" [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/481481-largest_247005_176125435777953_100001414932306_472158_5560201_n.jpg[/image] At least the female has a callipygian.
I freely admit that I had to look that shit up. And I have to say, kobaz, that's about the oddest turn of phrase I've seen in some time. Well played.
|
|
|
|
|
kobaz
Mar 7, 2012, 2:40 AM
Post #3219 of 3255
(7806 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726
|
j_ung wrote: kobaz wrote: acorneau wrote: Quadruple but shot and misspelled... "rapelling; just about sums up my experience hahaha" [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/photos/assets/1/481481-largest_247005_176125435777953_100001414932306_472158_5560201_n.jpg[/image] At least the female has a callipygian. I freely admit that I had to look that shit up. And I have to say, kobaz, that's about the oddest turn of phrase I've seen in some time. Well played.
Hah. I do think it describes the situation perfectly. It was a logic professor in college that introduced me to the word.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Mar 13, 2012, 11:35 AM
Post #3220 of 3255
(7655 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
I think this one deserves to be here:
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Mar 13, 2012, 6:08 PM
Post #3221 of 3255
(7582 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Ha! Nice find! Maybe photographer forgot to take camera off macro setting?
GO
|
|
|
|
|
mojomonkey
Mar 19, 2012, 9:19 PM
Post #3224 of 3255
(7347 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 869
|
I hope this is at least a sit start.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Mar 20, 2012, 8:46 AM
Post #3225 of 3255
(7280 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
The mixture of ridiculous late 00's flat brimmed backward squint DC hat and the early 90's reservoir tip over sized beanie is just too awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
33766_1561250185632_1066624581_31540299_4846557_n.jpg
