|
circello
Apr 3, 2008, 4:52 PM
Post #1 of 28
(19356 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 69
|
So I've heard (anecdotally) that using the middle/ring configuration is better because it keeps force more in the natural plane of your arm. In most cases I end up using the middle/ring combination the most (although this is certainly sequence/hold specific) However, my index finger seems to be much 'stronger' (anecdotally) than my ring finger. Do the benefits of the extra strength outweigh the more natural alignment of the middle/ring combination? Which do you use/prefer. BC
|
|
|
|
|
lena_chita
Moderator
Apr 3, 2008, 4:55 PM
Post #2 of 28
(19353 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087
|
Ummm.. depends? Thinking hard about it, I probably do use middle/ring combination more often b/c it feels more comfortable. But I never analyzed this specifically... Oh, and I have a great advantage over most people-"the two-finger pockets" end up being 3-dinger pockets for me more often than not. Edited b/c I realized that I said middle/index when in fact I meant middle/ring.
(This post was edited by lena_chita on Apr 3, 2008, 5:39 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
flint
Apr 3, 2008, 5:03 PM
Post #3 of 28
(19345 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 21, 2007
Posts: 543
|
Middle/ring is the better use because of the reason you stated. Basically keeping your skeleton strength of the middle fingers out ways the strength of your index because when your index is used it twists the alignment of the rest of your arm, making it less effective. j-
|
|
|
|
|
tedman
Apr 3, 2008, 5:15 PM
Post #4 of 28
(19322 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 5, 2007
Posts: 237
|
middle/ring might be 'better' for those reasons, but your pulleys are way weaker in your ring finger than your index. Was doing 2 finger pullups, index/middle. no problem....thought I could do a middle/ring, *pop* *pop*. was climbing with pinky/ring taped together so I wouldnt use my ring fingers for 2 months! And it should be noted that im a skinny guy, 155lbs full clothed and dripping wet. Granted hopefully your full weight isnt on your fingers on a given route, but dont lose your feet with just your middle/ring in pockets!
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Apr 3, 2008, 5:32 PM
Post #5 of 28
(19298 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
At my strongest, I preferred middle/ring because I could pull so much harder with those two fingers. It lined up the forces so much better. Since I'm on the injured reserve at the moment though, I'm favoring index/middle. If you want to talk just in terms of strongest finger, use your thumb.
|
|
|
|
|
WVUCLMBR
Apr 3, 2008, 5:34 PM
Post #6 of 28
(19293 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 20, 2007
Posts: 668
|
I like to go with 3 fingers. Typically 2 in the pink. And then 1 in the stink.
|
|
|
|
|
circello
Apr 3, 2008, 5:45 PM
Post #8 of 28
(19272 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 31, 2006
Posts: 69
|
Killfile ftw!
|
|
|
|
|
keegan540
Apr 3, 2008, 6:00 PM
Post #9 of 28
(19250 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 3, 2006
Posts: 54
|
WVUCLMBR wrote: I like to go with 3 fingers. Typically 2 in the pink. And then 1 in the stink. That's only effective when you have two pockets.
|
|
|
|
|
taydude
Apr 3, 2008, 6:28 PM
Post #10 of 28
(19213 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2006
Posts: 531
|
i always do mid/ring unless i can manage 3 fingers. idk bout the pulley popping thing. Ive been climbing 3 years and can do mono pullups on my ring fingers. i may just have crazy strong tendons though.
|
|
|
|
|
DaliLama
Apr 3, 2008, 6:39 PM
Post #11 of 28
(19195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 27
|
3 years of climbing is not enough to have "indestructible" pulleys. It will catch up with you if you don't watch it... trust me.
|
|
|
|
|
icyfrosty
Apr 3, 2008, 7:02 PM
Post #12 of 28
(19170 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2004
Posts: 31
|
WVUCLMBR wrote:I like to go with 3 fingers. Typically 2 in the pink. And then 1 in the stink. That's only effective when you have two pockets. Ok honest to God question: With or without Chalk?
(This post was edited by icyfrosty on Apr 3, 2008, 7:04 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Apr 3, 2008, 7:04 PM
Post #13 of 28
(19166 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
I find that middle/ring seems to fit most pockets better than middle/index because the way the joints line up and the direction of pull. So I mostly use middle/ring. When I get a pocket that fits middle/index I use that just to give the other finger a rest. But most of the pockets that I pull on are plastic and may be biased that way.
|
|
|
|
|
steady_climbing
Apr 3, 2008, 7:06 PM
Post #14 of 28
(19161 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 152
|
WVUCLMBR wrote: I like to go with 3 fingers. Typically 2 in the pink. And then 1 in the stink. Word I believe thats the "Shocker"
|
|
|
|
|
reg
Apr 3, 2008, 7:32 PM
Post #15 of 28
(19136 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 10, 2004
Posts: 1560
|
i just pulled down on a bookcase with my middle/ring and the ring felt weak - me: stronger with index/middle but i can't really speak to finger pockets as i've never climbed a route with them.
|
|
|
|
|
kyleshea
Apr 3, 2008, 7:49 PM
Post #16 of 28
(19119 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 1716
|
circello wrote: So I've heard (anecdotally) that using the middle/ring configuration is better because it keeps force more in the natural plane of your arm. In most cases I end up using the middle/ring combination the most (although this is certainly sequence/hold specific) However, my index finger seems to be much 'stronger' (anecdotally) than my ring finger. Do the benefits of the extra strength outweigh the more natural alignment of the middle/ring combination? Which do you use/prefer. BC the middle and index fingers have potential to be the stronger duo, but it must be trained to achieve this. as a non climber, when does the ring finger recieve such a stress that it needs to be built up? most likely almost never, so its weak. the pointer is initially stronger due to the fact it gets used more.
|
|
|
|
|
hopperhopper
Apr 3, 2008, 9:26 PM
Post #17 of 28
(19073 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Posts: 475
|
i like middle/ring better because they are closer to being the same length so they both can pull more evenly, and it feels better (stronger). someone told me it was better to use index/middle because of some kind of reason pertaining to pulleys and how index/middle spreads it across mulitple, while middle/ring are both on the same one...or something..? i have no idea. i've noticed a lot of people at the gym cringe when they see me use middle/ring.
|
|
|
|
|
kriso9tails
Apr 3, 2008, 10:12 PM
Post #18 of 28
(19051 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772
|
It's really going to depend on the pocket, my body position and the move, the hold, and the possibility of a thumb catch of any sort. In most cases it's going to be middle/ ring, but on many shallow pockets, long cross-over, moves requiring tension in upper core and chest, dynamic movements into the pockets and anything I want to (more or less) dead hang from it's going to be middle/ index for varying reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
justroberto
Apr 3, 2008, 10:21 PM
Post #19 of 28
(19043 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876
|
steady_climbing wrote: WVUCLMBR wrote: I like to go with 3 fingers. Typically 2 in the pink. And then 1 in the stink. Word I believe thats the "Shocker" Wait... You're only supposed to use three fingers for that?
|
|
|
|
|
kriso9tails
Apr 3, 2008, 10:37 PM
Post #20 of 28
(19037 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772
|
justroberto wrote: steady_climbing wrote: WVUCLMBR wrote: I like to go with 3 fingers. Typically 2 in the pink. And then 1 in the stink. Word I believe thats the "Shocker" Wait... You're only supposed to use three fingers for that? I was under the impression that the thumb should be involved; other wise I find it somewhat less manageable on my inflatab... on my 'girlfriend'.
|
|
|
|
|
tnchief
Apr 3, 2008, 11:26 PM
Post #21 of 28
(19013 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2003
Posts: 100
|
My buddies and I have often talked about this. After watching many people climb and looking at their hands, we have come to the conclusion that most people prefer to use the finger that is closest in length to the middle finger. The two closest matching fingers provide a more natural position (particularly with an open hand grip) and thereby creating a a stronger grip. I still prefer to use middle/ring even though I snapped a pulley tendon in both (left and right) ring fingers years ago (about 6 months apart). It hurts like hell. My advice, warm up thoroughly and DON'T SHOCKLOAD!
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Apr 3, 2008, 11:53 PM
Post #22 of 28
(18998 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
circello wrote: So I've heard (anecdotally) that using the middle/ring configuration is better because it keeps force more in the natural plane of your arm. In most cases I end up using the middle/ring combination the most (although this is certainly sequence/hold specific) However, my index finger seems to be much 'stronger' (anecdotally) than my ring finger. Do the benefits of the extra strength outweigh the more natural alignment of the middle/ring combination? Which do you use/prefer. BC Depends on what feels the best. If it is deep generally the ring and middle. Shallower, normally the middle and booger fingers. Sometimes a ring and pinky works best.
|
|
|
|
|
macblaze
Apr 4, 2008, 12:19 AM
Post #23 of 28
(18977 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 807
|
hopperhopper wrote: i like middle/ring better because they are closer to being the same length so they both can pull more evenly, and it feels better (stronger). someone told me it was better to use index/middle because of some kind of reason pertaining to pulleys and how index/middle spreads it across mulitple, while middle/ring are both on the same one...or something..? i have no idea. i've noticed a lot of people at the gym cringe when they see me use middle/ring. i like middle/indexbetter because they are closer to being the same length so they both can pull more evenly, and it feels better (stronger). Really, it has a lot to do with finger lengths...
|
|
|
|
|
irregularpanda
Apr 4, 2008, 1:05 AM
Post #24 of 28
(18936 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 13, 2007
Posts: 1364
|
macblaze wrote: hopperhopper wrote: i like middle/ring better because they are closer to being the same length so they both can pull more evenly, and it feels better (stronger). someone told me it was better to use index/middle because of some kind of reason pertaining to pulleys and how index/middle spreads it across mulitple, while middle/ring are both on the same one...or something..? i have no idea. i've noticed a lot of people at the gym cringe when they see me use middle/ring. i like middle/indexbetter because they are closer to being the same length so they both can pull more evenly, and it feels better (stronger). Really, it has a lot to do with finger lengths... i TRY TO ALTERNATE BETWEEN THE TWO. i ALSO LIKE TO TALK VERY LOUDLY, CAN YOU HEAR ME YET? i DO THIS BECAUSE OF HOW MANY TIMES i'VE INJURED MY RING FINGER, BUT FOR ME ITS NOT THE PULLEY, IT RIPS THE FASCIAL TISSUE ABOVE MY WRIST.
|
|
|
|
|
Myxomatosis
Apr 4, 2008, 1:41 AM
Post #25 of 28
(18916 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063
|
I have done ton's of pocket climbing and find that your index and middle are 9 out of 10 times the best combo. Most pockets are easily turned into side pulls once your feet are in the right position. Its alot easier to crank off your index in that situation... well for me personally.
|
|
|
|
|
|