Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


mhix13


Nov 5, 2008, 4:54 PM
Post #1 of 7 (3030 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 12, 2008
Posts: 85

Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So I've tried to search for this on here and I can't seem to find an answer.

I'm getting some pro and biners to start my trad rack. My question is does the shape of a particular carabiner influence it's likelihood to crossload in a fall?

Ie: An oval carabiner (a BD Oval Wire for instance) seems like it would be more stable because it's symetrical, but the gate may be longer than in a smaller differently shaped carabiner (a CAMP Nano 23) and therefore provide more surface area for a potential cross load.

Also have you ever had a carabiner crossload in a fall when you did not girth hitched, clove hitched, or wrapped the biner with a sling?


colatownkid


Nov 5, 2008, 5:07 PM
Post #2 of 7 (3022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 512

Re: [mhix13] Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i can't recall any fall i've taken on gear where the sling didn't end up running along the major axis of the biner, right along the spine.

as for shape influencing the likelihood of crossloading, i'm not sure. i climbed on D's until recently; now i use asymmetrical wiregate D's (BD neutrinos to be exact). in both cases, i've yet to notice crossloading (like the sling loading directly on the gate or something to that effect).

in general, D's are stronger than ovals because the biner is designed with the basket closer to the spine-side of the carabiner, thus putting more of the major axis load on the spine of the biner and less on the gate of the biner. D's typically come to a more defined "point" as well; as long as the rope/sling is sitting in this point, i see it as being rather unlikely to slip out and load anywhere but the spine.


shimanilami


Nov 5, 2008, 5:27 PM
Post #3 of 7 (3004 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [mhix13] Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The DMM Shield design is virtually impossible to cross load.



fancyclaps


Nov 5, 2008, 5:38 PM
Post #4 of 7 (2991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 23, 2005
Posts: 210

Re: [mhix13] Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You could always get some of these:

http://en.petzl.com/petzl/SportProduits?Produit=345

I have been climbing on Petzl Spirit Express draws for a while now and I have never had any problems with my carabiners rotating.


alleyehave


Nov 5, 2008, 6:57 PM
Post #5 of 7 (2954 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 13, 2005
Posts: 461

Re: [mhix13] Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mhix13 wrote:
Also have you ever had a carabiner crossload in a fall when you did not girth hitched, clove hitched, or wrapped the biner with a sling?

No, no, and no. And I wouldn't worry about it anywho or you're gonna have a lot of worries about a lot of different things when climbing.


maldaly


Nov 5, 2008, 7:43 PM
Post #6 of 7 (2935 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208

Re: [shimanilami] Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You can totally cross load that shape. From the basket side of the bend in the spine, draw a line to the nose and you'll see how easy it is to do. Is this shape better or worse than any other? It depends. Just don't go out climbing assuming that you can't cross load this biner-you can. It just cross loads differently that you may expect. It may be less likely to cross load than with a symmetrical oval or a D, with their spines parallel to the gates but please don't be under the illusion that they can't cross load.

Climb safe,
Mal


meahtots


Nov 5, 2008, 11:50 PM
Post #7 of 7 (2872 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2008
Posts: 105

Re: [maldaly] Shape of Carabiner and Cross loading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

maldaly wrote:
You can totally cross load that shape. From the basket side of the bend in the spine, draw a line to the nose and you'll see how easy it is to do. Is this shape better or worse than any other? It depends. Just don't go out climbing assuming that you can't cross load this biner-you can. It just cross loads differently that you may expect. It may be less likely to cross load than with a symmetrical oval or a D, with their spines parallel to the gates but please don't be under the illusion that they can't cross load.

Climb safe,
Mal

from the DMM website:

"We can not get a crossloading/minor axis strength using the standard UIAA/CE tests because the biner always falls into the major axis position once the load starts to be applied."

true, you shouldn't assume that you can't cross load it, but it is (dare i say) impossible to do it in any climbing application.

http://www.dmmclimbing.com/...s.asp?id=&id2=39


Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook