Forums: Climbing Information: Regional Discussions:
Crimson Chrysalis, no rack?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Regional Discussions

Premier Sponsor:

 


ianmeister89


Mar 14, 2010, 7:40 AM
Post #1 of 13 (3423 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 19, 2009
Posts: 140

Crimson Chrysalis, no rack?  (North_America: United_States: Nevada: Red_Rock_Canyon)
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't have a trad rack, unfortunately, but I have heard that Crimson Chrysalis may be bolted enough to attempt as a "sport" route. Are there any pitches with almost no bolts (sub4), requiring crux gear, or entirely devoid of bolted protection? Also, please tell me If you think I'm crazy, or this is not achievable. I'm looking for a little direction here, so anything would be appreciated.

Thanks
-Ian


johnwesely


Mar 14, 2010, 1:33 PM
Post #2 of 13 (3393 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [ianmeister89] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Judging by this, http://www.mountainproject.com/...per_canyon/105732281, you probably would not want to do that.


Partner j_ung


Mar 14, 2010, 3:21 PM
Post #3 of 13 (3348 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [ianmeister89] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ianmeister89 wrote:
I don't have a trad rack, unfortunately, but I have heard that Crimson Chrysalis may be bolted enough to attempt as a "sport" route. Are there any pitches with almost no bolts (sub4), requiring crux gear, or entirely devoid of bolted protection? Also, please tell me If you think I'm crazy, or this is not achievable. I'm looking for a little direction here, so anything would be appreciated.

Thanks
-Ian

How are you with 100'+ runouts?


marc801


Mar 14, 2010, 3:41 PM
Post #4 of 13 (3334 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [johnwesely] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
Judging by this, http://www.mountainproject.com/...per_canyon/105732281, you probably would not want to do that.
What he said. 22 protection bolts spread out over 9 pitches, the first occurring on P5.


jacobbelsher


Mar 14, 2010, 4:42 PM
Post #5 of 13 (3303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2005
Posts: 147

Re: [ianmeister89] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

instead: climb unimpeachable groping. 5.10A, well bolted. it is also right next door, (to the left i think). or, you could try dream of wild turkeys 10a, same deal. note: i think crimson is overrated anyway. these other routes are better.


spoon


Mar 14, 2010, 4:59 PM
Post #6 of 13 (3285 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 26, 2002
Posts: 312

Re: [ianmeister89] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You might also consider Prince of Darkness at 5.10b. It's first pitch is naturally protected 5.Easy, followed by bolted 5.10b. I think the third pitch has a section that takes pro but a set of nuts would probably more than cover it and it's not strictly necessary if you don't mind running it out a little.


Partner j_ung


Mar 14, 2010, 5:28 PM
Post #7 of 13 (3268 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [jacobbelsher] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jacobbelsher wrote:
instead: climb unimpeachable groping. 5.10A, well bolted. it is also right next door, (to the left i think). or, you could try dream of wild turkeys 10a, same deal. note: i think crimson is overrated anyway. these other routes are better.

I don't know about Unimpeachable Groping (great name!), but Wild Turkeys has long sections with no bolts. I think you go two full pitches before you see the first of them.


btg


Mar 14, 2010, 5:47 PM
Post #8 of 13 (3255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 16, 2008
Posts: 31

Re: [j_ung] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If memory serves me right :/ I think Crimson has at least one bolt about twentyish feet off the deck. But then things get kinda spacy.


Hennessey


Mar 15, 2010, 5:20 AM
Post #9 of 13 (3207 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 3, 2007
Posts: 595

Re: [spoon] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

spoon wrote:
You might also consider Prince of Darkness at 5.10b.

Horrable climb. From what I remember It's the same moves over and over again


flamer


Mar 17, 2010, 2:27 PM
Post #10 of 13 (3115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 22, 2002
Posts: 2955

Re: [jacobbelsher] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jacobbelsher wrote:
instead: climb unimpeachable groping. 5.10A, well bolted. it is also right next door, (to the left i think). or, you could try dream of wild turkeys 10a, same deal. note: i think crimson is overrated anyway. these other routes are better.

Unimpeachable Groping is about as close to a pure Multi pitch sport route as you can get in RR.
However, it's more like 5.10c/d.
I've done it twice, and both times thought the grade was 5.10+.
I've climbed CC 3.5 times....2.5 as a rope solo. It's a fun route and a lite rack is needed. If you had Nut's and cam's to 2" you'd be fine.

josh


boadman


Mar 17, 2010, 4:06 PM
Post #11 of 13 (3060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 7, 2003
Posts: 726

Re: [ianmeister89] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ianmeister89 wrote:
I don't have a trad rack, unfortunately, but I have heard that Crimson Chrysalis may be bolted enough to attempt as a "sport" route. Are there any pitches with almost no bolts (sub4), requiring crux gear, or entirely devoid of bolted protection? Also, please tell me If you think I'm crazy, or this is not achievable. I'm looking for a little direction here, so anything would be appreciated.

Thanks
-Ian

I think the first two pitches would be the only truly dangerous ones. After that you'd be high enough off the deck that the bolts that are there would keep you off the ground. The route isn't worth that much commitment though. Sounds like it's time to invest in some gear!


mtselman


Mar 17, 2010, 6:22 PM
Post #12 of 13 (3003 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 9, 2002
Posts: 134

Re: [ianmeister89] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ianmeister89 wrote:
I don't have a trad rack, unfortunately, but I have heard that Crimson Chrysalis may be bolted enough to attempt as a "sport" route. Are there any pitches with almost no bolts (sub4), requiring crux gear, or entirely devoid of bolted protection? Also, please tell me If you think I'm crazy, or this is not achievable. I'm looking for a little direction here, so anything would be appreciated.

Thanks
-Ian

Depends on how good you are. These guys: http://www.fishproducts.com/mbs/crimson/index.html did it with just some draws...

Stay safe!


mtnjohn


Mar 17, 2010, 6:38 PM
Post #13 of 13 (2987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 17, 2002
Posts: 230

Re: [spoon] Crimson Chrysalis, no rack? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Spoon, CC is NOT over rated.


Forums : Climbing Information : Regional Discussions

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook