|
5.samadhi
Sep 11, 2013, 2:10 AM
Post #2 of 14
(12579 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 31, 2011
Posts: 98
|
I thought it would be better if there wasn't so long of an intro...I mean brewing coffee, driving, throwing your pad through a slot, etc etc etc. Holy shit. Maybe 10 seconds of ONE of those things like preparing the viewer that climbing is coming. Bouldering videos should be about sending as many possible problems in a short time span.
You have a 5 minute video that you only send one problem. Why not send like 20 problems and show us that in 5 minutes?
PS the girl is hot
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Sep 11, 2013, 4:25 AM
Post #3 of 14
(12538 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
Gotta echo 5.sam's comment. Two minutes into a five minute vid and we still haven't even seen a rock, much less any climbing?
|
|
|
|
|
sjc850
Sep 11, 2013, 4:28 AM
Post #4 of 14
(12535 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 23, 2009
Posts: 8
|
In reply to: appreciated :) |
|
|
|
|
sjc850
Sep 11, 2013, 4:29 AM
Post #5 of 14
(12533 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 23, 2009
Posts: 8
|
In reply to: appreciated :) |
|
|
|
|
5.samadhi
Sep 11, 2013, 1:02 PM
Post #6 of 14
(12481 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 31, 2011
Posts: 98
|
is your next one in the making??? The rock looks cool.
I thought also we could use the name of the place with the name of the boulder and the grade. Its nice to know these things as a viewer.
|
|
|
|
|
bigbear11
Sep 11, 2013, 5:39 PM
Post #7 of 14
(12424 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2013
Posts: 10
|
more of what everyone else said.
I even skipped through the intro based on what others said and it was still to long.
|
|
|
|
|
markc
Sep 11, 2013, 6:07 PM
Post #8 of 14
(12415 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 2481
|
milesenoell wrote: Gotta echo 5.sam's comment. Two minutes into a five minute vid and we still haven't even seen a rock, much less any climbing?
It's nearly 3 minutes on the dot when he starts climbing. If you're going to edit out anything, I'd get rid of the accelerated driving bit. You already nicely transitioned from the city to the country. Speeding that segment up feels unnecessary and disjointed from the style of the rest of the video. That's not to say the intro couldn't be tightened in other ways, or that the climbing scenes couldn't be expanded to create more balance.
The approach was different, and I appreciate that the video isn't about crushing a huge number of problems. Perhaps showing both climbers trying a different problem or two (and different problems from each other initially), but everything coming into synch for both of them on that specific problem would be a good device?
|
|
|
|
|
sjc850
Sep 11, 2013, 8:15 PM
Post #9 of 14
(12380 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 23, 2009
Posts: 8
|
It's outside of Tum Tum, Washington. Not sure of a name and I would grade it around a 4-6 range
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Sep 11, 2013, 10:26 PM
Post #10 of 14
(12345 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
the climbing hold for the cabinet handle was a cool touch, and I second the request for info on the problem. could be added in the credits even.
|
|
|
|
|
sjc850
Sep 11, 2013, 10:36 PM
Post #11 of 14
(12335 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 23, 2009
Posts: 8
|
yes, thank you. As I said, not sure of the name. It's such a low traffic area. It was probably climbed years ago and then every so often ofter that.
|
|
|
|
|
Fred20
Sep 12, 2013, 6:11 PM
Post #12 of 14
(12271 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2012
Posts: 50
|
5.samahdi and others x 1,000
cool concept, poor execution... more climbing less coffee?
The male took forever to get ready and go, girl wakes up in what seems to be a hotel and just leaves?
Since when do women get ready for ANYTHING faster than men?
It was nicely done though!
|
|
|
|
|
sjc850
Sep 12, 2013, 6:21 PM
Post #13 of 14
(12267 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 23, 2009
Posts: 8
|
thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
