 |

strokies
Jun 22, 2005, 4:24 AM
Post #1 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2005
Posts: 44
|
I've been slacking in my yard between a basketball pole and a telephone pole. I noticed the other day that the telephone pole is leaning inward. I think it would be the end of my slacking and/or life if that pole fell. Is there any way the pole could fall?
|
|
|
 |
 |

theledge
Jun 22, 2005, 4:49 AM
Post #2 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 25, 2005
Posts: 116
|
We use telephone poles (of a slightly higher grade) on our ropes course. They are stabilized with cables for security but I have never seen any shift while doing my inspections. If the telephone/power guys felt a little lazy that day about digging or your soil really sucked I could see it falling over, but my guess would be that if you died in such an accident it was because God hates you. Btw how high are you on this pole? high lining? I would think that would be the only way to generate enough leverage.
|
|
|
 |
 |

crazyakclimber
Jun 22, 2005, 5:52 AM
Post #3 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 69
|
You should probably quit because there is a good possibility of the pole falling on your head. Once, I had a freak slack lining incident when a telephone pole hit me in the head... Luckily I was wearing my helmet!!! :lol:
|
|
|
 |
 |

ucfrockclimber
Jun 23, 2005, 6:44 PM
Post #4 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2005
Posts: 24
|
nothing person crazyYak but uh why were you wearing your helmet while slacklining, unless you were high lining?
|
|
|
 |
 |

crazyakclimber
Jun 24, 2005, 2:08 AM
Post #5 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 69
|
because the telephone pole was leaning a little inward so I was just a little bit concerned about the pole hitting me in the head... and sure enough! WAP! It nailed me in the noggin mate!
|
|
|
 |
 |

strokies
Jun 24, 2005, 3:50 AM
Post #6 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2005
Posts: 44
|
Thanks crazyyak, I have been wearing my helmet lately, I feel much safer. I am not highlining, I'm about 5 feet high. I feel safe about it now. I was just wondering if anyone had ever had one fall on their head, so now I have my answer. Thanks
|
|
|
 |
 |

florissantti
Jun 24, 2005, 2:22 PM
Post #7 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 21, 2005
Posts: 24
|
i have a power line pole here in this new place i'm at. i was looking at it the other day, and it's set up funky. the line it supports is sort of in a V forming about a 75 degree angle. the support wire is centered right in the middle of this V. yeah, someone is an idiot.
|
|
|
 |
 |

strokies
Jun 27, 2005, 7:28 PM
Post #9 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2005
Posts: 44
|
Well, it doesn't matter now becuase the basketball pole bent over last night, so I won't be slacking there anymore.
|
|
|
 |
 |

crazyakclimber
Jun 27, 2005, 10:05 PM
Post #10 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 69
|
DANG... That's hard core! where you wearing your helmet man? I never knew that slacking could be so intense.
|
|
|
 |
 |

strokies
Jun 28, 2005, 8:35 PM
Post #11 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2005
Posts: 44
|
Intense...yes, but thanks to you Yak, I only have a small scratch on my helmet, instead of a ditch in my melon.
|
|
|
 |
 |

tgreene
Jun 28, 2005, 8:56 PM
Post #12 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 22, 2003
Posts: 7267
|
This is also why I never ride a bike without wearing a condom... :tinfoilhat: ALWAYS USE PROTECTION! :righton:
|
|
|
 |
 |

corpse
Jun 28, 2005, 8:57 PM
Post #13 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 17, 2003
Posts: 822
|
I always thought 5 feet was a high line.
|
|
|
 |
 |

duck
Jun 28, 2005, 9:31 PM
Post #14 of 22
(14522 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2002
Posts: 84
|
For the record, poles are set far more shallow then you'd think. Most poles are set at 10%+2 feet. Think about that hard. Poles are balanced for load, that's why there's guy (Anchor) wires. Also, the voltages on even little short poles are usually 8,200 Volts or better and will give you a freakish lobster style death. I know a thing or two about high voltage ;)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Fa310tx
Apr 24, 2009, 2:22 AM
Post #15 of 22
(11191 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 19, 2009
Posts: 22
|
What about using a telephone pole for a top rope anchor? Obviously, I'm not talking about 10 hours a day, every day of the week, just a couple of hours here and there. There's a spot that I've been looking at that doesn't have trees or big rocks, but there is a line of poles that run atop the cliff. JJ
|
|
|
 |
 |

NDKalltheway
Apr 24, 2009, 2:30 AM
Post #16 of 22
(11179 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 21, 2008
Posts: 27
|
You'd still need 2 anchors, maybe three if you weren't sure of the pole. But if you had 3 anchors, you'd probably wouldn't be asking if you should/could anchor to the pole. I wouldn't feel very good about it, but I guess it depends on how desperately you want to climb. And as long as you don't take a big fall considering its a top rope I suppose the force on the pole would be low.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Fa310tx
Apr 24, 2009, 3:03 PM
Post #17 of 22
(11125 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 19, 2009
Posts: 22
|
NDKalltheway wrote: You'd still need 2 anchors, maybe three if you weren't sure of the pole. But if you had 3 anchors, you'd probably wouldn't be asking if you should/could anchor to the pole. I wouldn't feel very good about it, but I guess it depends on how desperately you want to climb. And as long as you don't take a big fall considering its a top rope I suppose the force on the pole would be low. Ok... I figured a telephone pole would be quite strong, but I'll take your advice. The poles are in a row along the cliff, but they may not be close enough for roping on to. JJ
|
|
|
 |
 |

dingus
Apr 24, 2009, 3:16 PM
Post #18 of 22
(11113 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 17398
|
If the owners of that pole find your rig attached to it you're gonna be buying a new pole and paying the wages of those who plant it.... about $1000 is my guess. DMT
|
|
|
 |
 |

acorneau
Apr 26, 2009, 3:25 AM
Post #19 of 22
(11003 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
dingus wrote: If the owners of that pole find your rig attached to it you're gonna be buying a new pole and paying the wages of those who plant it.... about $1000 is my guess. DMT I'm guessing he means using the pole that is at the top of a cliff to rig a top rope anchor, not rigged at the top of the pole. Why would he have to buy the owners a new pole if they caught him using it with a rope or webbing tied around the bottom?
(This post was edited by acorneau on Apr 26, 2009, 3:26 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

taydude
Apr 26, 2009, 5:11 AM
Post #20 of 22
(10965 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2006
Posts: 531
|
NDKalltheway wrote: You'd still need 2 anchors, maybe three if you weren't sure of the pole. But if you had 3 anchors, you'd probably wouldn't be asking if you should/could anchor to the pole. I wouldn't feel very good about it, but I guess it depends on how desperately you want to climb. And as long as you don't take a big fall considering its a top rope I suppose the force on the pole would be low. whoa seriously? If the pole is bomber, you probably don't need 2 anchors. If it's not, you shouldn't anchor to it b/c it's really big and you don't want to pull that down onto yourself.
|
|
|
 |
 |

patto
Apr 26, 2009, 6:42 AM
Post #21 of 22
(10947 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
NDKalltheway wrote: You'd still need 2 anchors, maybe three if you weren't sure of the pole. But if you had 3 anchors, you'd probably wouldn't be asking if you should/could anchor to the pole. I wouldn't feel very good about it, but I guess it depends on how desperately you want to climb. And as long as you don't take a big fall considering its a top rope I suppose the force on the pole would be low. Lol I find the redundant police hilarious. A decently thick telephone pole could happily take 100kN at the base I don't think the pole failing or high forces would be a problem. I find the logic of redundancy in anchors funny when concerning trees and poles that if they failed would take the anchor down with it. (though using 2 anchors might be necessary for correct positioning of the top rope) Lol I love the
|
|
|
 |
 |

Adk
Apr 26, 2009, 10:57 AM
Post #22 of 22
(10922 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1085
|
a thread brought back from the dead.
|
|
|
 |
|
|