|
hardeight
Aug 5, 2010, 7:16 PM
Post #1 of 65
(15809 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 11, 2005
Posts: 33
|
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Aug 5, 2010, 7:37 PM
Post #2 of 65
(15783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere..
List an advantage of the knot over the EDK.
Edit: Full OP, thanks to jt512
hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand.
(This post was edited by spikeddem on Aug 5, 2010, 8:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Aug 5, 2010, 7:38 PM
Post #3 of 65
(15783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand.
Gumbies should not be innovating at all, much less inventing their own rappel knots.
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
csproul
Aug 5, 2010, 7:38 PM
Post #4 of 65
(15779 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 4, 2004
Posts: 1769
|
hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand.
(This post was edited by csproul on Aug 5, 2010, 7:39 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Aug 5, 2010, 7:38 PM
Post #5 of 65
(15777 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
spikeddem wrote: hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. List an advantage of the knot over the EDK.
That's an easy one. It's untested, and therefore adds excitement to the rappel.
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
boymeetsrock
Aug 5, 2010, 7:41 PM
Post #6 of 65
(15767 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709
|
jt512 wrote: hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand. Gumbies should not be innovating at all, much less inventing their own rappel knots. Jay
Please site your sources.
http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;
|
|
|
|
|
hardeight
Aug 5, 2010, 7:42 PM
Post #7 of 65
(15766 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 11, 2005
Posts: 33
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2010, 7:45 PM
Post #8 of 65
(15757 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
hardeight wrote: An EDK should not be even mentioned as an option to tie in any forum. The knot is death.
T0, you just blew it.
|
|
|
|
|
boymeetsrock
Aug 5, 2010, 7:46 PM
Post #9 of 65
(15753 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 11, 2005
Posts: 1709
|
Might I suggest you do a search of this site for the many threads that have discussed the EDK as a valid rappelling knot. Who knows, you might even find it in some other sources as well...
|
|
|
|
|
styndall
Aug 5, 2010, 7:47 PM
Post #10 of 65
(15747 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 29, 2002
Posts: 2741
|
hardeight wrote: An EDK should not be even mentioned as an option to tie in any forum. The knot is death.
The EDK is the best. Seriously, plenty strong and not likely to catch.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Aug 5, 2010, 7:53 PM
Post #11 of 65
(15741 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
boymeetsrock wrote: jt512 wrote: hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand. Gumbies should not be innovating at all, much less inventing their own rappel knots. Jay Please site your sources. http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;
The concept of gumby innovation has been around a lot longer than that.
Climbsomething coins term "gumby innovation" (2003).¹
I add Gumby Innovation category to Gumby of the Year Awards (2004).²
Jay
References:
¹http://www.rockclimbing.com/...on%26quot%3B;#564637
²http://www.rockclimbing.com/...on%26quot%3B;#627740
|
|
|
|
|
hardeight
Aug 5, 2010, 7:56 PM
Post #12 of 65
(15733 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 11, 2005
Posts: 33
|
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2010, 7:59 PM
Post #13 of 65
(15728 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
hardeight wrote: Well I see this site has not changed much over the past 5 years.. Always flaming people and floating off the original topic. Planting the seeds of mistrust and objection to whatever is posted. It is a wonder anyone stays a member and if they do why they log on an post a question at all..
A question on this site receives the answer that it deserves more often than not. You came up with some crazy huge knot and acted like you just cured cancer and then disparaged the accepted knot out of ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Aug 5, 2010, 8:00 PM
Post #14 of 65
(15726 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
hardeight wrote: Well I see this site has not changed much over the past 5 years.. Always flaming people and floating off the original topic. Planting the seeds of mistrust and objection to whatever is posted. It is a wonder anyone stays a member and if they do why they log on an post a question at all..
Please file your complaint using the correct form.
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2010, 8:02 PM
Post #15 of 65
(15722 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
Jay, you missed your calling as a librarian.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Aug 5, 2010, 8:03 PM
Post #16 of 65
(15718 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
hardeight wrote: Well I see this site has not changed much over the past 5 years.. Always flaming people and floating off the original topic. Planting the seeds of mistrust and objection to whatever is posted. It is a wonder anyone stays a member and if they do why they log on an post a question at all..
In reply to: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere..
I mean, you didn't pause at all after writing that last sentence I quoted and think "oh...hmm."?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Aug 5, 2010, 8:06 PM
Post #17 of 65
(15710 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
spikeddem wrote: hardeight wrote: Well I see this site has not changed much over the past 5 years.. Always flaming people and floating off the original topic. Planting the seeds of mistrust and objection to whatever is posted. It is a wonder anyone stays a member and if they do why they log on an post a question at all.. In reply to: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. I mean, you didn't pause at all after writing that last sentence I quoted and think "oh...hmm."?
Reminds me of the guy I saw at Maple Canyon a couple weeks ago who ties in with a slip knot.
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
welle
Aug 5, 2010, 8:10 PM
Post #18 of 65
(15702 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 8, 2008
Posts: 212
|
hardeight wrote: An EDK should not be even mentioned as an option to tie in any forum. The knot is death.
Why not do some research online? Plenty of tests out there that have proven that flat overhand with sufficient tails is as strong as any other knot. AMGA guides use it. I am so tired of arguing with my climbing partners about EDK it gets a bit ridiculous. Please stop spreading false info, and if you are so unsure maybe hire a guide to pick on collective wisdom...
(This post was edited by welle on Aug 5, 2010, 8:14 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2010, 8:14 PM
Post #19 of 65
(15687 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
Dang, we didn't quote the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Aug 5, 2010, 8:17 PM
Post #20 of 65
(15675 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
johnwesely wrote: Dang, we didn't quote the OP.
Browser cache to the rescue:
hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand. |
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2010, 8:19 PM
Post #21 of 65
(15667 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
I figured you would be able to find it somehow.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Aug 5, 2010, 9:11 PM
Post #22 of 65
(15610 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
I've actually seen this knot used- some gumby used it because they didn't know how to tie a fishermans knot. The fucking knot was literally two feet long- I cant believe it didn't get stuck.
A class on proper knots for rappel was promptly given.
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Aug 5, 2010, 10:14 PM
Post #23 of 65
(15570 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
jt512 wrote: boymeetsrock wrote: jt512 wrote: hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. Tie a figure 8 knot in the end of one rope leaving a long tail. Tie another figure eight knot in the tail of the second rope. to join the two ropes tie the tail of the first rope as a follow through figure eight into the second rope and the tail of the second rope as a follow through into the first. It is like tying two ropes together with a double fisherman but you are using a figure 8 knot.. this image is as close as I can get Of course you pull both figure eight knots together as you would with a double fisherman knot then if any tail is left over secure with overhand. Gumbies should not be innovating at all, much less inventing their own rappel knots. Jay Please site your sources. http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;The concept of gumby innovation has been around a lot longer than that. Climbsomething coins term "gumby innovation" (2003).¹ I add Gumby Innovation category to Gumby of the Year Awards (2004).² Jay References: ¹ http://www.rockclimbing.com/...on%26quot%3B;#564637 ² http://www.rockclimbing.com/...on%26quot%3B;#627740
ha.. should bring the gumby awards back.
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Aug 5, 2010, 11:19 PM
Post #24 of 65
(15527 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
jt512 wrote: spikeddem wrote: hardeight wrote: Well I see this site has not changed much over the past 5 years.. Always flaming people and floating off the original topic. Planting the seeds of mistrust and objection to whatever is posted. It is a wonder anyone stays a member and if they do why they log on an post a question at all.. In reply to: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. I mean, you didn't pause at all after writing that last sentence I quoted and think "oh...hmm."? Reminds me of the guy I saw at Maple Canyon a couple weeks ago who ties in with a slip knot. Jay
That makes it much easier to untie, right?
|
|
|
|
|
trenchdigger
Aug 5, 2010, 11:26 PM
Post #25 of 65
(15514 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 9, 2003
Posts: 1447
|
jt512 wrote: spikeddem wrote: hardeight wrote: I have used this method many times in the past but it is funny how I have not seen it posted anywhere.. List an advantage of the knot over the EDK. That's an easy one. It's untested, and therefore adds excitement to the rappel. Jay
A gumby innovation indeed, but c'mon Jay, do you really need to pull test this to get a rough idea of whether or not this would be strong enough to rap on. This isn't exactly rocket science (or multivariate statistics).
What the OP ended up with be about the same strength as a simple figure-8 bend, take at least twice as long to tie/untie, and have an extra knot to make it more likely to get stuck when pulled. Perhaps it provides some statistical improvement in safety if you're an idiot and regularly screw up tying the figure-8 bend (I mean, it is a really complex knot, right?). But if that's not the case, you're probably better off just sticking with the figure-8 bend or, if you prefer, the EDK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
