 |

Halljt3
Nov 13, 2012, 4:01 AM
Post #1 of 57
(31361 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
My gym recently had a event to support a local climber who has Leukemia. There was a raffle in which i won a set of Climb X nuts. Anyone have any experience with this brand? Couldn't really find any review / info... Either way support a good cause / win some free gear win win situation! Thanks
|
|
|
 |
 |

bearbreeder
Nov 13, 2012, 4:22 AM
Post #2 of 57
(31350 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
ya cant go wrong with free nutz from the pics they look like a basic set like the huevo or old BD ones ... id expect them to work just fine
|
|
|
 |
 |

USnavy
Nov 13, 2012, 10:02 AM
Post #3 of 57
(31299 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
Halljt3 wrote: My gym recently had a event to support a local climber who has Leukemia. There was a raffle in which i won a set of Climb X nuts. Anyone have any experience with this brand? Couldn't really find any review / info... Either way support a good cause / win some free gear win win situation! Thanks Yep, they are a disgrace. Climb X is a knock off of Mad Rock. The owner of Climb X used to work for Mad Rock. While working there he committed espionage and stole a company computer containing sensitive product development information. He then used his existing knowledge and the data on that computer to completely copy Mad Rock's entire product line. Mad Rock sued Climb X and of course got a settlement. Or at least that is what they say. The only thing that is truly clear is that the owner of Climb X is a very shady and dishonest person. Every person I know that knows the owner of Climb X has had nothing but bad things to say. Dont buy product from Climb X, you are supporting a very shady company.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Nov 13, 2012, 10:04 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

healyje
Nov 13, 2012, 10:17 AM
Post #4 of 57
(31293 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
USnavy wrote: Yep, they are a disgrace. Climb X is a knock off of Mad Rock. The owner of Climb X used to work for Mad Rock. While working there he committed espionage and stole a company computer containing sensitive product development information. He then used his existing knowledge and the data on that computer to completely copy Mad Rock's entire product line. Mad Rock sued Climb X and of course got a settlement. Or at least that is what they say. The only thing that is truly clear is that the owner of Climb X is a very shady and dishonest person. Every person I know that knows the owner of Climb X has had nothing but bad things to say. Dont buy product from Climb X, you are supporting a very shady company. Dude, that's like saying the CIA ripped off the KGB.
|
|
|
 |
 |

USnavy
Nov 13, 2012, 2:05 PM
Post #5 of 57
(31256 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
 |
 |

theextremist04
Nov 13, 2012, 8:51 PM
Post #6 of 57
(31183 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2010
Posts: 189
|
USnavy wrote: Halljt3 wrote: My gym recently had a event to support a local climber who has Leukemia. There was a raffle in which i won a set of Climb X nuts. Anyone have any experience with this brand? Couldn't really find any review / info... Either way support a good cause / win some free gear win win situation! Thanks Yep, they are a disgrace. Climb X is a knock off of Mad Rock. The owner of Climb X used to work for Mad Rock. While working there he committed espionage and stole a company computer containing sensitive product development information. He then used his existing knowledge and the data on that computer to completely copy Mad Rock's entire product line. Mad Rock sued Climb X and of course got a settlement. Or at least that is what they say. The only thing that is truly clear is that the owner of Climb X is a very shady and dishonest person. Every person I know that knows the owner of Climb X has had nothing but bad things to say. Dont buy product from Climb X, you are supporting a very shady company. 1) the OP didn't buy them 2) he just asked how good the nuts were. I'm sure they work just fine.
|
|
|
 |
 |

healyje
Nov 13, 2012, 10:39 PM
Post #7 of 57
(31151 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with.
|
|
|
 |
 |

maldaly
Nov 14, 2012, 2:50 AM
Post #8 of 57
(31094 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208
|
I'm staying out of this.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Halljt3
Nov 14, 2012, 5:18 AM
Post #9 of 57
(31063 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
Well... I doubt anyone who actually owns anything from Climb X will post on this thread for fear of internet persecution! O well, figured I would ask anyways. They look decent.... I will give them a go this weekend.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Nov 14, 2012, 9:13 AM
Post #10 of 57
(31038 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Halljt3 wrote: Well... I doubt anyone who actually owns anything from Climb X will post on this thread for fear of internet persecution! O well, figured I would ask anyways. They look decent.... I will give them a go this weekend. I own Climb X gear. If you place them correctly, you'll be fine. The rest of the conversation, I'll stay out of too.
|
|
|
 |
 |

gosharks
Nov 14, 2012, 11:48 AM
Post #11 of 57
(31018 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268
|
healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx
|
|
|
 |
 |

sbaclimber
Nov 14, 2012, 12:27 PM
Post #12 of 57
(31008 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx ...your point being?
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Nov 14, 2012, 12:29 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Gmburns2000
Nov 14, 2012, 12:37 PM
Post #13 of 57
(31000 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them.
|
|
|
 |
 |

sbaclimber
Nov 14, 2012, 12:43 PM
Post #14 of 57
(30995 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. That was obvious.
Gmburns2000 wrote: I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them. Exactly. That particular point is moot. Hint: that would be like saying that BD is going to go postal on DMM for producing the Dragon Cams.
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Nov 14, 2012, 12:45 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

Gmburns2000
Nov 14, 2012, 12:53 PM
Post #15 of 57
(30987 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
sbaclimber wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. That was obvious. Gmburns2000 wrote: I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them.Exactly. That particular point is moot. Hint: that would be like saying that BD is going to go postal on DMM for producing the Dragon Cams. Yeah. I would have thought that petzl would have seen this a long time ago.
|
|
|
 |
 |

sbaclimber
Nov 14, 2012, 12:57 PM
Post #16 of 57
(30983 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. That was obvious. Gmburns2000 wrote: I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them.Exactly. That particular point is moot. Hint: that would be like saying that BD is going to go postal on DMM for producing the Dragon Cams. Yeah. I would have thought that petzl would have seen this a long time ago. I am sure they did....just like I am sure BD knew that DMM was going to *copy* the camalots as soon as they were allowed to. ....still moot.
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Nov 14, 2012, 12:58 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Nov 14, 2012, 1:09 PM
Post #17 of 57
(30968 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
On the same note, the same year the patent is up on the grigri, the Gri Gri 2 gets released. Go figure.
|
|
|
 |
 |

JimTitt
Nov 14, 2012, 2:30 PM
Post #19 of 57
(30935 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 1002
|
guangzhou wrote: On the same note, the same year the patent is up on the grigri, the Gri Gri 2 gets released. Go figure. Quite so, not Petzlīs finest hour if you ask me. The older Grigri is still the tool of choice for a lot of climbers including me and dropping it from production only opened the gate to any other manufacturer to straight copy, Petzl canīt claim any IP rights as they donīt make them any more.
|
|
|
 |
 |

USnavy
Nov 14, 2012, 10:50 PM
Post #20 of 57
(30826 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
 |
 |

bearbreeder
Nov 14, 2012, 11:55 PM
Post #22 of 57
(30799 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
I take it you bash totem as well
|
|
|
 |
 |

USnavy
Nov 15, 2012, 5:24 AM
Post #23 of 57
(30753 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
 |
 |

healyje
Nov 15, 2012, 6:48 AM
Post #24 of 57
(30742 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
USnavy wrote: healyje wrote: USnavy wrote: It seems Climb X has reached a new low. Not only are they steeling ideas from Mad Rock, but apparently now Petzl too. What a joke...  You seem to be under the entirely mistaken impression that this is somehow new behavior or behavior exhibited by only one of these two parties. You clearly haven't been following along. I have been following along, and I am aware that companies like DMM have ripped off designes from other companies like Black Diamond. But there is a big difference between taking a design and improving or modifying it and simply copying an entire product line. Climb X is not taking one product and improving on it, they are simply making cookie cutter replicas for every product they sell - big difference. They are the only "company" in the industry that has a 100% all fake and copied product line. No other company rips off more designs than they do. You're still operating under the delusion that behavior isn't common to both parties when it's really more just a divorce of a very like-minded couple.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Khoi
Nov 15, 2012, 11:54 PM
Post #25 of 57
(30623 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 294
|
healyje wrote: USnavy wrote: healyje wrote: USnavy wrote: It seems Climb X has reached a new low. Not only are they steeling ideas from Mad Rock, but apparently now Petzl too. What a joke...  You seem to be under the entirely mistaken impression that this is somehow new behavior or behavior exhibited by only one of these two parties. You clearly haven't been following along. I have been following along, and I am aware that companies like DMM have ripped off designes from other companies like Black Diamond. But there is a big difference between taking a design and improving or modifying it and simply copying an entire product line. Climb X is not taking one product and improving on it, they are simply making cookie cutter replicas for every product they sell - big difference. They are the only "company" in the industry that has a 100% all fake and copied product line. No other company rips off more designs than they do. You're still operating under the delusion that behavior isn't common to both parties when it's really more just a divorce of a very like-minded couple. I am insufficiently informed. What has Mad Rock straight up copied? Please educate me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|