|
Halljt3
Nov 13, 2012, 4:01 AM
Post #1 of 57
(31161 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
My gym recently had a event to support a local climber who has Leukemia. There was a raffle in which i won a set of Climb X nuts. Anyone have any experience with this brand? Couldn't really find any review / info... Either way support a good cause / win some free gear win win situation! Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Nov 13, 2012, 4:22 AM
Post #2 of 57
(31150 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
ya cant go wrong with free nutz from the pics they look like a basic set like the huevo or old BD ones ... id expect them to work just fine
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 13, 2012, 10:02 AM
Post #3 of 57
(31099 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
Halljt3 wrote: My gym recently had a event to support a local climber who has Leukemia. There was a raffle in which i won a set of Climb X nuts. Anyone have any experience with this brand? Couldn't really find any review / info... Either way support a good cause / win some free gear win win situation! Thanks Yep, they are a disgrace. Climb X is a knock off of Mad Rock. The owner of Climb X used to work for Mad Rock. While working there he committed espionage and stole a company computer containing sensitive product development information. He then used his existing knowledge and the data on that computer to completely copy Mad Rock's entire product line. Mad Rock sued Climb X and of course got a settlement. Or at least that is what they say. The only thing that is truly clear is that the owner of Climb X is a very shady and dishonest person. Every person I know that knows the owner of Climb X has had nothing but bad things to say. Dont buy product from Climb X, you are supporting a very shady company.
(This post was edited by USnavy on Nov 13, 2012, 10:04 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 13, 2012, 10:17 AM
Post #4 of 57
(31093 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
USnavy wrote: Yep, they are a disgrace. Climb X is a knock off of Mad Rock. The owner of Climb X used to work for Mad Rock. While working there he committed espionage and stole a company computer containing sensitive product development information. He then used his existing knowledge and the data on that computer to completely copy Mad Rock's entire product line. Mad Rock sued Climb X and of course got a settlement. Or at least that is what they say. The only thing that is truly clear is that the owner of Climb X is a very shady and dishonest person. Every person I know that knows the owner of Climb X has had nothing but bad things to say. Dont buy product from Climb X, you are supporting a very shady company. Dude, that's like saying the CIA ripped off the KGB.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 13, 2012, 2:05 PM
Post #5 of 57
(31056 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
|
|
theextremist04
Nov 13, 2012, 8:51 PM
Post #6 of 57
(30983 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2010
Posts: 189
|
USnavy wrote: Halljt3 wrote: My gym recently had a event to support a local climber who has Leukemia. There was a raffle in which i won a set of Climb X nuts. Anyone have any experience with this brand? Couldn't really find any review / info... Either way support a good cause / win some free gear win win situation! Thanks Yep, they are a disgrace. Climb X is a knock off of Mad Rock. The owner of Climb X used to work for Mad Rock. While working there he committed espionage and stole a company computer containing sensitive product development information. He then used his existing knowledge and the data on that computer to completely copy Mad Rock's entire product line. Mad Rock sued Climb X and of course got a settlement. Or at least that is what they say. The only thing that is truly clear is that the owner of Climb X is a very shady and dishonest person. Every person I know that knows the owner of Climb X has had nothing but bad things to say. Dont buy product from Climb X, you are supporting a very shady company. 1) the OP didn't buy them 2) he just asked how good the nuts were. I'm sure they work just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 13, 2012, 10:39 PM
Post #7 of 57
(30951 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with.
|
|
|
|
|
maldaly
Nov 14, 2012, 2:50 AM
Post #8 of 57
(30894 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208
|
I'm staying out of this.
|
|
|
|
|
Halljt3
Nov 14, 2012, 5:18 AM
Post #9 of 57
(30863 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
Well... I doubt anyone who actually owns anything from Climb X will post on this thread for fear of internet persecution! O well, figured I would ask anyways. They look decent.... I will give them a go this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Nov 14, 2012, 9:13 AM
Post #10 of 57
(30838 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Halljt3 wrote: Well... I doubt anyone who actually owns anything from Climb X will post on this thread for fear of internet persecution! O well, figured I would ask anyways. They look decent.... I will give them a go this weekend. I own Climb X gear. If you place them correctly, you'll be fine. The rest of the conversation, I'll stay out of too.
|
|
|
|
|
gosharks
Nov 14, 2012, 11:48 AM
Post #11 of 57
(30818 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268
|
healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Nov 14, 2012, 12:27 PM
Post #12 of 57
(30808 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx ...your point being?
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Nov 14, 2012, 12:29 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 14, 2012, 12:37 PM
Post #13 of 57
(30800 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Nov 14, 2012, 12:43 PM
Post #14 of 57
(30795 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. That was obvious.
Gmburns2000 wrote: I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them. Exactly. That particular point is moot. Hint: that would be like saying that BD is going to go postal on DMM for producing the Dragon Cams.
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Nov 14, 2012, 12:45 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 14, 2012, 12:53 PM
Post #15 of 57
(30787 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
sbaclimber wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. That was obvious. Gmburns2000 wrote: I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them.Exactly. That particular point is moot. Hint: that would be like saying that BD is going to go postal on DMM for producing the Dragon Cams. Yeah. I would have thought that petzl would have seen this a long time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
sbaclimber
Nov 14, 2012, 12:57 PM
Post #16 of 57
(30783 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: sbaclimber wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: All this goes back way before Madrock on both sides of things. This all goes back decades and the fact these two parties are at odds doesn't make either one of them people I'd do business with. Madrock never pulled this though: http://climbxgear.com/...autobelaydevice.aspx...your point being? I think he's trying to say it looks oddly similar to another very popular product on the market, albeit definitely not made by madrock. That was obvious. Gmburns2000 wrote: I'm not sure what the point is either, unless he's saying it's only a matter of time before petzl goes postal on them.Exactly. That particular point is moot. Hint: that would be like saying that BD is going to go postal on DMM for producing the Dragon Cams. Yeah. I would have thought that petzl would have seen this a long time ago. I am sure they did....just like I am sure BD knew that DMM was going to *copy* the camalots as soon as they were allowed to. ....still moot.
(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Nov 14, 2012, 12:58 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Nov 14, 2012, 1:09 PM
Post #17 of 57
(30768 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
On the same note, the same year the patent is up on the grigri, the Gri Gri 2 gets released. Go figure.
|
|
|
|
|
JimTitt
Nov 14, 2012, 2:30 PM
Post #19 of 57
(30735 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2008
Posts: 1002
|
guangzhou wrote: On the same note, the same year the patent is up on the grigri, the Gri Gri 2 gets released. Go figure. Quite so, not Petzl´s finest hour if you ask me. The older Grigri is still the tool of choice for a lot of climbers including me and dropping it from production only opened the gate to any other manufacturer to straight copy, Petzl can´t claim any IP rights as they don´t make them any more.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 14, 2012, 10:50 PM
Post #20 of 57
(30626 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Nov 14, 2012, 11:55 PM
Post #22 of 57
(30599 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
I take it you bash totem as well
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 15, 2012, 5:24 AM
Post #23 of 57
(30553 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 15, 2012, 6:48 AM
Post #24 of 57
(30542 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
USnavy wrote: healyje wrote: USnavy wrote: It seems Climb X has reached a new low. Not only are they steeling ideas from Mad Rock, but apparently now Petzl too. What a joke... You seem to be under the entirely mistaken impression that this is somehow new behavior or behavior exhibited by only one of these two parties. You clearly haven't been following along. I have been following along, and I am aware that companies like DMM have ripped off designes from other companies like Black Diamond. But there is a big difference between taking a design and improving or modifying it and simply copying an entire product line. Climb X is not taking one product and improving on it, they are simply making cookie cutter replicas for every product they sell - big difference. They are the only "company" in the industry that has a 100% all fake and copied product line. No other company rips off more designs than they do. You're still operating under the delusion that behavior isn't common to both parties when it's really more just a divorce of a very like-minded couple.
|
|
|
|
|
Khoi
Nov 15, 2012, 11:54 PM
Post #25 of 57
(30423 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 294
|
healyje wrote: USnavy wrote: healyje wrote: USnavy wrote: It seems Climb X has reached a new low. Not only are they steeling ideas from Mad Rock, but apparently now Petzl too. What a joke... You seem to be under the entirely mistaken impression that this is somehow new behavior or behavior exhibited by only one of these two parties. You clearly haven't been following along. I have been following along, and I am aware that companies like DMM have ripped off designes from other companies like Black Diamond. But there is a big difference between taking a design and improving or modifying it and simply copying an entire product line. Climb X is not taking one product and improving on it, they are simply making cookie cutter replicas for every product they sell - big difference. They are the only "company" in the industry that has a 100% all fake and copied product line. No other company rips off more designs than they do. You're still operating under the delusion that behavior isn't common to both parties when it's really more just a divorce of a very like-minded couple. I am insufficiently informed. What has Mad Rock straight up copied? Please educate me.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 16, 2012, 12:09 AM
Post #26 of 57
(17256 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
That ship has come and gone so many times as to be a joke in the industry as is starting companies, racking up payables, and bailing to do it serially. If you've missed the endemic plagiarism all along then either you weren't around, weren't paying attention, or were blind.
|
|
|
|
|
Khoi
Nov 16, 2012, 12:17 AM
Post #27 of 57
(17252 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 294
|
healyje wrote: That ship has come and gone so many times as to be a joke in the industry as is starting companies, racking up payables, and bailing to do it serially. If you've missed the endemic plagiarism all along then either you weren't around, weren't paying attention, or were blind. I did not ask about the bolded part, as that is not been brought up in this thread. I am asking about the charges against Mad Rock of plagiarism. It's not that I don't believe you; I simply am not aware, but would like to be informed. I didn't get into climbing until May of 2007, so I haven't been around that long. Since then, I have only used La Sportiva and Scarpa climbing shoes - nothing from Mad Rock. What did I miss or not notice?
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Nov 16, 2012, 2:14 AM
Post #28 of 57
(17233 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Khoi wrote: healyje wrote: That ship has come and gone so many times as to be a joke in the industry as is starting companies, racking up payables, and bailing to do it serially. If you've missed the endemic plagiarism all along then either you weren't around, weren't paying attention, or were blind. I did not ask about the bolded part, as that is not been brought up in this thread. I am asking about the charges against Mad Rock of plagiarism. It's not that I don't believe you; I simply am not aware, but would like to be informed. I didn't get into climbing until May of 2007, so I haven't been around that long. Since then, I have only used La Sportiva and Scarpa climbing shoes - nothing from Mad Rock. What did I miss or not notice? Let's start with the history and development of climbing shoe lines.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 16, 2012, 9:05 AM
Post #29 of 57
(17198 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 16, 2012, 9:08 AM
Post #30 of 57
(17195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
|
|
rmsusa
Nov 16, 2012, 5:12 PM
Post #31 of 57
(17156 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2004
Posts: 1017
|
Good move. Me too.
|
|
|
|
|
maldaly
Nov 16, 2012, 6:02 PM
Post #32 of 57
(17143 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1208
|
USNavy, Trango never ripped off or copied any designs from Rock Empire. Here's the story: You almost got it right. (My old-age memory is not what it used to be so I may have some dates and product names wrong here. I don't have acess to the Trango files any more so I can't verify.) When I first met Jindrich Hudecek in 1991, he had just started a line of retail stores in Czech. Remember, the Iron Curtain had just fallen in 1989 so this was a whole new world for these guys. They had started Hudy Sports (Hudy is Jindrich's nickname) and had three stores, two in Prague and one in Decin. They are HQ'd in Hrensko, on the Elbe river on the border between Czech and Germany. They are about 10 miles downstream from the famous "Dresden" cliffs. At the time, Hudy Sports did not have a brand name. They sold product from other companies just like Dicks Sporting Goods or REI does but without their own brand. What they were doing was using their business knowledge and access to capital to buy controlling interest is some of their supplying factories so they could bring the product and deliveries up to modern standards They were selling some Czech-made harnesses that were really nice, seemed to be well made and carried the CE certification so I negotiated a deal with them to make these harnesses as Trango harnesses for sale in the US. We made some sizing modifications, gear loop modifications and added a full strength haul loop to the back. If you remember the Trango Vertical, it sold really really well. It was a full featured, adjustable leg loop fully padded harness for under $50. At the time, the standard was the BD Bod Harness and we stomped it. After running with their harnesses for a cuple of years they showed me some cams from a factory (Kouba I think) they were considering buying. They were nice, a bit rough around the edges but pull tests showed they were very strong, had CE and, importantly, we needed a single-stem cam to sell. We worked with them on some modifications: adding a double-looped sling, introducing proportional-length axles and color-coding that match popular cams in the US. Slight modifications, for sure, but necessary for the US market. We brought them in as Trango Flex-Cams in 1997. At the time, there was no Rock Empire. Hudy did not own a product brand yet but as demand for well made product bloomed in Europe he began to think about it. I don't remember when RE came on line but what I do know is that their cams were not the Trango Flex Cams. Initially they were called Axle Cams and color coding matched their other cam line (Robot) and they didn't have proportionally spaced axles. Well, the inevitable happened and soon, we were fighting a Canadian black marketeer who was bringing in our Flex Cams but with Rock Empire labels. We fought it for a year or so and then moved our production to Korea. Whatever, they were great single axle cams and we never had any QC problems with them. We were proud to sell them. Climb safe, Mal
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 16, 2012, 7:41 PM
Post #33 of 57
(17124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Yes, you are misinformed - this is definitely a divorce between tweedledee and tweedledum. Before this divorce their collective behavior against other manufacturers was exactly the same as what you are now seeing against each other. I find in-turn familial cannibalism fairly amusing and karmic.
|
|
|
|
|
Khoi
Nov 16, 2012, 8:17 PM
Post #34 of 57
(17110 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 294
|
USnavy wrote: Khoi wrote: healyje wrote: That ship has come and gone so many times as to be a joke in the industry as is starting companies, racking up payables, and bailing to do it serially. If you've missed the endemic plagiarism all along then either you weren't around, weren't paying attention, or were blind. I am asking about the charges against Mad Rock of plagiarism. It's not that I don't believe you; I simply am not aware, but would like to be informed. Against Climb X, not Mad Rock. Mad Rock was the plaintiff/ victim. http://www.dpmclimbing.com/...against-climb-x-gear The Case of Mad Rock vs. Climb X: Joe Garland was a Marketing and Sales Manager for Mad Rock during the years of 2002-2009. During his tenure, Garland attended trade shows and over saw the in-house sales staff. In his position at Mad Rock, Garland was allegedly privy to classified information including athlete contacts, business contracts, patent information, and overall company branding standards. He worked for the company from 2002-2009, then in 2010 he departed to pursue new ventures. Upon Garland’s departure, Mad Rock alledges that his desk was cleared out and allegedly a lap top computer was found to be missing. The hard drive of the computer allegedly contained sensitive customer information, as well as photographs of Mad Rock’s products and other proprietary information, including their graphic design and branding standards. The alleged computer was never recovered. Garland reappeared on the climbing scene months later and launched a new climbing company called Climb X, which was registered in Canada as Climb-X Sports Inc. The new company that Garland formed had undeniably striking similarities to Garland’s past employer Mad Rock. The newly released Climb X ads depicted product photos which are identical to Mad Rock products. I didn't ask for elaboration on plagiarism charges against Climb-X. I asked for elaboration on plagiarism charges against Mad Rock. I am very aware of the shenanegans of Joe Garland, as that happened well after I had started climbing.
healyje wrote: Yes, you are misinformed - this is definitely a divorce between tweedledee and tweedledum. Before this divorce their collective behavior against other manufacturers was exactly the same as what you are now seeing against each other. I find in-turn familial cannibalism fairly amusing and karmic. If Mad Rock has commited the same underhanded practises that Joe Garland has, then I really want to be informed. So far, I have not had much success with a google search, and your responses have been almost just as non-informative. Was Mad Rock's inagural lineup all carbon copies of Five Ten???
|
|
|
|
|
gosharks
Nov 16, 2012, 8:30 PM
Post #35 of 57
(17103 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268
|
healyje wrote: Yes, you are misinformed - this is definitely a divorce between tweedledee and tweedledum. Before this divorce their collective behavior against other manufacturers was exactly the same as what you are now seeing against each other. I find in-turn familial cannibalism fairly amusing and karmic. What did Mad Rock copy?
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 16, 2012, 9:23 PM
Post #36 of 57
(17085 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: Yes, you are misinformed - this is definitely a divorce between tweedledee and tweedledum. Before this divorce their collective behavior against other manufacturers was exactly the same as what you are now seeing against each other. I find in-turn familial cannibalism fairly amusing and karmic. What did Mad Rock copy? If you invert that the answer could be a tweet.
|
|
|
|
|
gosharks
Nov 16, 2012, 10:29 PM
Post #37 of 57
(17075 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268
|
healyje wrote: gosharks wrote: healyje wrote: Yes, you are misinformed - this is definitely a divorce between tweedledee and tweedledum. Before this divorce their collective behavior against other manufacturers was exactly the same as what you are now seeing against each other. I find in-turn familial cannibalism fairly amusing and karmic. What did Mad Rock copy? If you invert that the answer could be a tweet. I don't know what your problem is, but you keep spouting accusations with nothing to support them with. Give us something to work with and let us decide for ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 16, 2012, 11:43 PM
Post #38 of 57
(17056 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
gosharks wrote: I don't know what your problem is, but you keep spouting accusations with nothing to support them with. Give us something to work with and let us decide for ourselves. Your problem is you're blind or just not paying attention.
|
|
|
|
|
gosharks
Nov 17, 2012, 12:33 AM
Post #39 of 57
(17041 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 268
|
healyje wrote: gosharks wrote: I don't know what your problem is, but you keep spouting accusations with nothing to support them with. Give us something to work with and let us decide for ourselves. Your problem is you're blind or just not paying attention. Look, I'm honestly trying to get some facts and understand what happened and you're dodging simple questions with terse remarks. I don't get why you're doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 17, 2012, 12:35 AM
Post #40 of 57
(17039 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
For fairly obvious reasons, but hey, take a look at catalogs for the past few years, it's all self-explanatory.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Nov 17, 2012, 1:17 AM
Post #41 of 57
(17030 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
What healy has alluded to like 10 times but seems unwilling to actually say is that the Mad Rock guys used to work for 5.10. Walked out the door one day and started Mad Rock, with a shoe line strikingly similar to the 5.10s of the day. Except made in china, about 2/3rds the price, and pretty low quality. I don't know who they ripped their carabiners off from, but they pretty much suck too. I think Mad Rock started in like 2002 or so? So if you weren't climbing then... it isn't surprising that you didn't notice.
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 17, 2012, 1:31 AM
Post #42 of 57
(17020 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
Except it wasn't a one-time, start-up activity, but rather a lifestyle.
|
|
|
|
|
Halljt3
Nov 17, 2012, 11:43 PM
Post #43 of 57
(16939 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
Gave them a try today took a whipper on a #2... didn't budge. Probably wouldn't have spent my own money supporting Climb X, but for what its worth they get the job done.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Nov 18, 2012, 12:41 AM
Post #44 of 57
(16896 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
Halljt3 wrote: Gave them a try today took a whipper on a #2... didn't budge. Probably wouldn't have spent my own money supporting Climb X, but for what its worth they get the job done. Bingo. Congratulations on winning the free set of nuts, by the way.
|
|
|
|
|
Halljt3
Nov 18, 2012, 12:47 AM
Post #45 of 57
(16892 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
Thanks man
|
|
|
|
|
gunkiemike
Nov 18, 2012, 2:14 PM
Post #46 of 57
(16841 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 1, 2002
Posts: 2266
|
caughtinside wrote: What healy has alluded to like 10 times but seems unwilling to actually say is that the Mad Rock guys used to work for 5.10. Walked out the door one day and started Mad Rock, with a shoe line strikingly similar to the 5.10s of the day. I must have not been paying attention either when 5.10 shoes had a diffe rent rubber around the perimeter for edging. It toothed heels for hooking. Both MR innovations if I'm not mistaken. I don't have a dog in this fight; I've never bought anything from either MR or ClimbX. M.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Nov 18, 2012, 4:24 PM
Post #47 of 57
(16833 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
Climbx seems pretty sketchy. I mean, they're excepting orders for a breaking device! I've had previous breaking devices before, like dimpled Aliens or Link Cams, but I'd rather not have a breaking belay device. But here's a question: would this breaking device that climbx is excepting orders for be appropriate for raping single ropes? Or is just for belaying?
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Nov 18, 2012, 4:33 PM
Post #48 of 57
(16829 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
caughtinside wrote: What healy has alluded to like 10 times but seems unwilling to actually say is that the Mad Rock guys used to work for 5.10. Walked out the door one day and started Mad Rock, with a shoe line strikingly similar to the 5.10s of the day. Except made in china, about 2/3rds the price, and pretty low quality. I don't know who they ripped their carabiners off from, but they pretty much suck too. I think Mad Rock started in like 2002 or so? So if you weren't climbing then... it isn't surprising that you didn't notice. Yeah, I recall that both Five Ten and Madrock came out with those scalloped heel cups at about the same time, to list one specific (I'm noticing that Healey is having a hard time with specific data points, and rather restates broad assumptions based on circumstantial evidence. Was he working for the GOP this past election cycle?).
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Nov 18, 2012, 9:42 PM
Post #50 of 57
(16800 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
moose_droppings wrote: camhead wrote: (I'm noticing that Healey is having a hard time with specific data points, and rather restates broad assumptions based on circumstantial evidence. Was he working for the GOP this past election cycle?). That'll hit Joe right below his political belt. Nah, it's actual just a reflection of the litigious nature of the individuals getting the divorce.
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Nov 19, 2012, 4:35 AM
Post #51 of 57
(4299 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Nov 19, 2012, 4:39 AM
Post #52 of 57
(4291 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
USnavy wrote: camhead wrote: But here's a question: would this breaking device that climbx is excepting orders for be appropriate for raping single ropes? Or is just for belaying? It is not suited for belaying or rappelling. That device is best suited as a trash can weight to prevent trash can loss due to high winds. Fill the can with as many of these as you can find for optimal wind resistance performance. Durp.
|
|
|
|
|
Halljt3
Mar 17, 2013, 8:54 PM
Post #54 of 57
(3872 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
Ha yeah man tried to win that rope myself! By the way I met you at Manchester on friday. Looking forward to that Seneca trip.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Mar 17, 2013, 10:07 PM
Post #55 of 57
(3850 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Halljt3 wrote: Ha yeah man tried to win that rope myself! By the way I met you at Manchester on friday. Looking forward to that Seneca trip. That was you?? So random. Thought you said you didn't post, just lurked. Bring those pirated, and possibly exploding, nuts to seneca and we'll head to the east face. See if we can't take a few falls on em.
|
|
|
|
|
Halljt3
Mar 17, 2013, 10:49 PM
Post #56 of 57
(3841 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 14, 2012
Posts: 14
|
notapplicable wrote: Halljt3 wrote: Ha yeah man tried to win that rope myself! By the way I met you at Manchester on friday. Looking forward to that Seneca trip. That was you?? So random. Thought you said you didn't post, just lurked. Bring those pirated, and possibly exploding, nuts to seneca and we'll head to the east face. See if we can't take a few falls on em. Yessir pretty crazy! Yeah I had forgotten about this thread until I got a email notification... Didn't remember if my account was with MP or RC. I will hit you up the next weekend i'm free!
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Mar 18, 2013, 5:00 AM
Post #57 of 57
(3801 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
gunkiemike wrote: caughtinside wrote: What healy has alluded to like 10 times but seems unwilling to actually say is that the Mad Rock guys used to work for 5.10. Walked out the door one day and started Mad Rock, with a shoe line strikingly similar to the 5.10s of the day. I must have not been paying attention either when 5.10 shoes had a different rubber around the perimeter for edging. It toothed heels for hooking. Both MR innovations if I'm not mistaken... Well, Young Chu (founder and owner of MadRock) had been the lead shoe designer for Five Ten for many years and was supposedly working on those designs when he departed from 5.10 and started his own company. I have no idea what the legal arrangement was between 5.10 and Chu with respect to intellectual property, but it certainly raised a few eyebrows when his new company beat 5.10 to market with these innovations he was supposedly working on for Five Ten. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|