 |

guangzhou
Jul 20, 2012, 3:51 AM
Post #1 of 9
(3257 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
For those of you who enjoy Classic Literature check out the Gutenberg site. They are making books with expired copyrights available for down load and in Kindle Format too. http://www.gutenberg.org/ Happy Reading Eman
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Jul 21, 2012, 2:23 AM
Post #2 of 9
(3225 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
There archive is actually pretty good. Reading classic lit on an electronic format seems kind of in poor taste though.
(This post was edited by notapplicable on Jul 21, 2012, 2:24 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

scott.nearing
Jul 25, 2012, 2:16 PM
Post #3 of 9
(3195 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 48
|
great tip thanks
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jul 28, 2012, 3:29 AM
Post #4 of 9
(3178 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
notapplicable wrote: There archive is actually pretty good. Reading classic lit on an electronic format seems kind of in poor taste though. For those who travel a lot and read on a kindle, nook, or tablet it seems fine to me. With that said, regardless of the book, magazine, or newspaper, I prefer to hold a paper version in my hands for sure.
|
|
|
 |
 |

sungam
Jul 28, 2012, 10:36 AM
Post #5 of 9
(3165 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
notapplicable wrote: There archive is actually pretty good. Reading classic lit on an electronic format seems kind of in poor taste though. No way! That's like saying listening to Glenn Miller on an MP3 player is in bad taste. You don't need a gramophone to rock out and shake it down to "Don't sit under the apple tree". "I only read paper" is running the risk of becoming the new "I only listen to vinyl". While digital lacks some of the character (both of books and music recordings) of the earlier version, it doesn't effect the quality of the writer/artist. I was recently given a kindle for no reason (except the person was awesome and felt like being generous) and while I was kinda not sure how they would be before I am a massive fan now.
(This post was edited by sungam on Jul 28, 2012, 11:17 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

SylviaSmile
Aug 24, 2012, 9:06 PM
Post #6 of 9
(3084 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2011
Posts: 983
|
sungam wrote: notapplicable wrote: There archive is actually pretty good. Reading classic lit on an electronic format seems kind of in poor taste though. No way! That's like saying listening to Glenn Miller on an MP3 player is in bad taste. You don't need a gramophone to rock out and shake it down to "Don't sit under the apple tree". "I only read paper" is running the risk of becoming the new "I only listen to vinyl". While digital lacks some of the character (both of books and music recordings) of the earlier version, it doesn't effect the quality of the writer/artist. I was recently given a kindle for no reason (except the person was awesome and felt like being generous) and while I was kinda not sure how they would be before I am a massive fan now. I got a Kindle as well, through a bank promotion, and I have to say it's been pretty useful for getting free books, including classics and cookbooks, with almost zero effort. I don't even have to go to the library. I can see why some people are so against them . . .
|
|
|
 |
 |

SylviaSmile
Aug 24, 2012, 9:08 PM
Post #7 of 9
(3082 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2011
Posts: 983
|
But there is one big thing the Kindle fails on: when I lie down in bed to read, I can't lie on my side or the orientation on the darn thing will skew so I can't read it at all.
|
|
|
 |
 |

SylviaSmile
Aug 24, 2012, 9:09 PM
Post #8 of 9
(3080 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2011
Posts: 983
|
And along those lines, though there might not be much difference in weight, the Kindle is more awkward to hold in one hand and turn pages than a paperback book.
|
|
|
 |
|
|