|
climberchk
Aug 21, 2001, 6:50 AM
Post #1 of 2
(586 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2001
Posts: 304
|
In Climbing Magazine (september's issue #206 pg 36) There is a story on a man who went into Fontainebleau with a hammer and destroyed some of the area's classic problems. My question is this, Is it right to try and recreate some of the problem's, or "have the rocks suffered enough?" I would love your opnion! Thanks
[ This Message was edited by: climberchk on 2001-08-20 23:51 ]
[ This Message was edited by: climberchk on 2001-08-21 22:22 ]
|
|
|
|
|
andy_lemon
Oct 23, 2001, 8:47 PM
Post #2 of 2
(586 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2001
Posts: 3335
|
I read that article... man did it piss me off. I can't beleive some idiot would do such a thing. I tell you if that ever happened to a climbing area in Illinois there would be some aggressive people twards that person (e.g. guidebook wrighter Eric Ulner). lol
I heard somewhere they were talking about putting some kind of chemical on the rock to sort of recreate the holds. I wouldn't, leave them as they are and make some new bouldering problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
