 |

carabiner96
Aug 27, 2011, 6:33 PM
Post #1 of 14
(3685 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong?
|
|
|
 |
 |

jakedatc
Aug 27, 2011, 6:48 PM
Post #2 of 14
(3682 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
carabiner96 wrote: Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong? Pretty sure there has to be a law against that.... state of emergency should make it be only essential personnel.. which i'm guessing you aren't.
|
|
|
 |
 |

carabiner96
Aug 27, 2011, 7:00 PM
Post #3 of 14
(3678 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
jakedatc wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong? Pretty sure there has to be a law against that.... state of emergency should make it be only essential personnel.. which i'm guessing you aren't. Shut up!! Actually, I don't think VT is quite at SOE level, but everyone is closed on Sunday erieguardless.
|
|
|
 |
 |

carabiner96
Aug 27, 2011, 7:01 PM
Post #4 of 14
(3677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
carabiner96 wrote: jakedatc wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong? Pretty sure there has to be a law against that.... state of emergency should make it be only essential personnel.. which i'm guessing you aren't. Shut up!! Actually, I don't think VT is quite at SOE level, but everyone is closed on Sunday erieguardless. Nevermind, Gubbner called it last hour. Oh well.
|
|
|
 |
 |

dan2see
Aug 28, 2011, 3:29 AM
Post #5 of 14
(3645 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 29, 2006
Posts: 1497
|
Good luck, guys!
|
|
|
 |
 |

qwert
Aug 28, 2011, 8:34 AM
Post #6 of 14
(3635 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
carabiner96 wrote: Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong? To make a stupid joke, or not to make one, that is the question… While i dont really get it where the difference between "dangerous weather", and "americans cant built solid buildings+ infrastructure" is, with that kind of weather warnings, i wish you folks the best of luck! qwert
|
|
|
 |
 |

petsfed
Aug 28, 2011, 4:21 PM
Post #7 of 14
(3621 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
qwert wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong?To make a stupid joke, or not to make one, that is the question… While i dont really get it where the difference between "dangerous weather", and "americans cant built solid buildings+ infrastructure" is, with that kind of weather warnings, i wish you folks the best of luck! qwert There's the issue of flooding and blown down trees to worry about. If you live in a place where both can be managed simply by better infrastructure, it must look very sterile.
|
|
|
 |
 |

carabiner96
Aug 29, 2011, 3:19 PM
Post #8 of 14
(3590 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
I guess I jinxed it.... Downtown Brandon:
Waterbury (10 min from my house)
Route 4:
You can see the high water mark in this pic from Waterbury:
Downtown Waitsfield:
All pictures from burlingtonfreepress.com
|
|
|
 |
 |

carabiner96
Aug 29, 2011, 6:22 PM
Post #9 of 14
(3570 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
carabiner96 wrote: I guess I jinxed it.... Downtown Brandon: [image]http://cmsimg.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Site=BT&Date=20110828&Category=NEWS07&ArtNo=828001&Ref=PH&Item=8&Maxw=620&Maxh=465&q=80[/image] Waterbury (10 min from my house) [image]http://cmsimg.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Site=BT&Date=20110828&Category=NEWS02&ArtNo=108280801&Ref=PH&Item=1&Maxw=620&Maxh=465&q=80[/image] Route 4: [image]http://cmsimg.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Site=BT&Date=20110828&Category=NEWS02&ArtNo=108280801&Ref=PH&Item=3&Maxw=620&Maxh=465&q=80[/image] You can see the high water mark in this pic from Waterbury: [image]http://cmsimg.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Site=BT&Date=20110828&Category=NEWS02&ArtNo=108280801&Ref=PH&Item=11&Maxw=620&Maxh=465&q=80[/image] Downtown Waitsfield: [image]http://cmsimg.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Site=BT&Date=20110828&Category=NEWS02&ArtNo=108280801&Ref=PH&Item=52&Maxw=620&Maxh=465&q=80[/image] All pictures from burlingtonfreepress.com What the heck....those aren't the pictures I posted, the links must just be a placeholder for their slideshow and when they add new pictures the orders change...oh well, check out their website for the best.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Aug 29, 2011, 7:30 PM
Post #10 of 14
(3559 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
petsfed wrote: qwert wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Unlike the rest of the East Coast, I still have to work the next two days. But it's cool, I've got 4WD, a tow strap, a life jacket and a chainsaw. What could possibly go wrong?To make a stupid joke, or not to make one, that is the question… While i dont really get it where the difference between "dangerous weather", and "americans cant built solid buildings+ infrastructure" is, with that kind of weather warnings, i wish you folks the best of luck! qwert There's the issue of flooding and blown down trees to worry about. If you live in a place where both can be managed simply by better infrastructure, it must look very sterile. One can live someplace that looks very sterile and still have these issues:
|
|
|
 |
 |

carabiner96
Aug 29, 2011, 7:37 PM
Post #11 of 14
(3557 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Not sure what kind of infrastructure could stand up to what folks are thinking is a 200 yr flood.
|
|
|
 |
 |

qwert
Aug 30, 2011, 7:28 AM
Post #12 of 14
(3534 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
carabiner96 wrote: Not sure what kind of infrastructure could stand up to what folks are thinking is a 200 yr flood. [image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/321511_10150298209082726_662297725_7863968_1623392_n.jpg[/image] Infrastructure that is built to stand up to 200a floods? I dont know the US regulations (and the german ones also not very good), but if i remember correctly all kinds of infrastructure and buildings have to be built to certain standarts, in order to withstand various events that are deemed likely enough. Could very well be that 200a events are not deemed important enough for some small roads. Just the same as in Japan, where noone though that an earthquake could be stronger than 8, and hit at the same time as a tsunami… qwert
|
|
|
 |
 |

Allfred
Aug 30, 2011, 12:20 PM
Post #13 of 14
(3527 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 29, 2011
Posts: 421
|
qwert wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Not sure what kind of infrastructure could stand up to what folks are thinking is a 200 yr flood. [image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/321511_10150298209082726_662297725_7863968_1623392_n.jpg[/image] Infrastructure that is built to stand up to 200a floods? I dont know the US regulations (and the german ones also not very good), but if i remember correctly all kinds of infrastructure and buildings have to be built to certain standarts, in order to withstand various events that are deemed likely enough. Could very well be that 200a events are not deemed important enough for some small roads. Just the same as in Japan, where noone though that an earthquake could be stronger than 8, and hit at the same time as a tsunami… qwert Wind is a 50 year mean recurrence interval, 100 year for critical structures like hospitals, schools, stadiums (think superdome), etc. Flooding: 100 year. But I guess a lot of it is locally driven based on the National Flood Insurance Program charts.
|
|
|
 |
 |

kachoong
Aug 30, 2011, 2:56 PM
Post #14 of 14
(3512 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
Allfred wrote: qwert wrote: carabiner96 wrote: Not sure what kind of infrastructure could stand up to what folks are thinking is a 200 yr flood. [image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/s720x720/321511_10150298209082726_662297725_7863968_1623392_n.jpg[/image] Infrastructure that is built to stand up to 200a floods? I dont know the US regulations (and the german ones also not very good), but if i remember correctly all kinds of infrastructure and buildings have to be built to certain standarts, in order to withstand various events that are deemed likely enough. Could very well be that 200a events are not deemed important enough for some small roads. Just the same as in Japan, where noone though that an earthquake could be stronger than 8, and hit at the same time as a tsunami… qwert Wind is a 50 year mean recurrence interval, 100 year for critical structures like hospitals, schools, stadiums (think superdome), etc. Flooding: 100 year. But I guess a lot of it is locally driven based on the National Flood Insurance Program charts. and how long data has been recorded.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|