Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Sport Climbing: Re: [fracture] To retro or not?: Edit Log




jt512


Jun 1, 2007, 4:49 PM

Views: 4195

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [fracture] To retro or not?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

fracture wrote:
jt512 wrote:
healyje wrote:
the vast majority of gym and sport climbers simply want safe entertainment.

Utter nonsense. Entertainment is passive.

Wtf? Since when? (My dictionaries say nothing of the sort.)

Of course sport climbing is entertainment. It's a sport!

I'm using a definition along the lines of this one from Am. Her.: "Something that amuses, pleases, or diverts, especially a performance or show."

I would never refer to climbing as "entertainment." In fact, I am using the word in the same sense that Joseph is using it sarcastically: something that's safe, easy, passive. He would never call "his kind" of climbing "entertainment," unless he is willing to call it "unsafe entertainment," which I doubt he is willing to do.

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on Jun 1, 2007, 4:54 PM)



Edit Log:
Post edited by jt512 () on Jun 1, 2007, 4:54 PM


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?