|
|
Forums:
Climbing Disciplines:
Sport Climbing:
Re: [fracture] To retro or not?:
Edit Log
|
|
macblaze
Jun 1, 2007, 6:31 PM
Views: 4228
Registered: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 807
|
fracture wrote: ...volatile conflicts between disparate local climbing user sub-groups, there has been a need for something else.
Thanks for the new sig!
fracture wrote: In these cases, I think a representative system of government is extremely reasonable (do you have an alternative suggestion we could discuss?).
Yah, I'm thinking that if we don't respect the concept of FA (not my def'n of anarchy btw) then we'll be dealing with a nice little totalitarian dictatorship i.e. the gov't will step in and all the "town hall" meetings and public forums in the world won't stop a bunch of non-climbers from dictating how and when we climb. But no... "a representative system of government" is a fallacy when dealing with special interest groups.
Hark and mark my words! The climbing license is around the corner. If thy permit is not stamp'd by the local magistrate then thou shall not lead climb here! Have you passed your official Yos belay test administered by the $6/hr summer student? Whoa unto us, thou shalt not rappel without your level 3 rappelling certification... And by these signs ye shall recognize the democratic system!
(This post was edited by macblaze on Jun 1, 2007, 6:34 PM)
|
|
|
Edit Log:
|
|
Post edited by macblaze
() on Jun 1, 2007, 6:33 PM
|
|
Post edited by macblaze
() on Jun 1, 2007, 6:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
