camhead wrote:
so, I was thinking about this the other day at the gym, while I was watching a pretty good climber get shut down on a heel-hook-sloper move.
We all know about how there are moves that shut down short people... we think less about moves that shut down tall people; high steps, hand-foot matches, high heel hooks, etc. And in harder sport climbing, I think it is safe to say that perhaps
Then I looked at the top fifteen male climbers on 8a.nu; the average height of them is 171.9 cm (about 5'7"), which is lower than the average caucasian male height of 5'10"... why is this? I have heard probably a dozen times from friends about meeting a pro climber "whoa, he's so much shorter than I thought he would be."
In hard sort climbing, say 5.13 and up, do physical limitations of flexibility and keeping your body into the wall, which disadvantage taller climbers, outweigh the physical limitations of reach that disadvantage shorter climbers?
I would love to hear from the engineers and statisticians here (yeah, you jt512!)