aerili wrote:
TerminalVelocity wrote:
Wow, your a complete fucking moron. You should just stick with paying for girls at "The Ranch".
Aside from the fact that I never have to pay for sex, T.V., what kind of exercise science research and application did you develop in the fucking moron-ville they call your head?
(I figured that last paragraph was apt to be in language you understand.)
TerminalVelocity wrote:
She's the one who says you can't gain size and strength while also increasing endurance. Yeah that degree bought her a shit load of useful information. Why don't you ask a someone who is older than a 25 year old just out of school, with proven research and ask them.
Firstly, it is true you cannot gain size, strength
and endurance all while doing the exact same kind of exercise (i.e. stuff like your Nordic trek recommendation).
Secondly, I LOVE IT when people think I'm 25 and apparently just out of school! I am soooo flattered!!! So much so that I don't think I will burst your bubble with reality.
TerminalVelocity wrote:
My 20 years of experience are nothing compared to her degree reading old text books, which the information has dramatically changed and continues to change daily.
But actually, Mr. Velocity, this quote is truly the best of the bunch.
Why, you ask?
Well, aside from the fact that you think theoretical study has absolutely nothing to do with practical application (regardless of the marvels of science and techology all around you), it just makes me laugh that you actually believe the workout you posted is somehow....hmmm....NEW, PROVEN TO GIVE THE IDEAL RESULTS, or even remotely CUTTING EDGE.
I mean, really, your workout based on h.s. football training from 20 years ago? Cause your knock-me-out training format has been used for that long (and more). But I can tell you, ain't no one in my "qualified, degreed" training studio (where we
do train athletes....where men even let ME train THEM to gain MUSCLE! craziness, huh!!) would ask people to pay them for that kind of laymen/noob workout.
