Forums: Climbing Information: Beginners: Re: [rangerrob] Question of status : Edit Log




Learner


Jul 22, 2011, 2:55 AM

Views: 6408

Registered: May 28, 2011
Posts: 187

Re: [rangerrob] Question of status
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  

rangerrob wrote:
In reply to:
I consider your status as a climber to be an indicator of, and determined by, your climbing level. It is a label for how hard you climb. If you climb...

5.8 and lower = BEGINNER
5.9-5.11b = INTERMEDIATE
5.11c-5.13b = ADVANCED
5.13c on up = EXPERT

I think the nickname of the person who came up with this nonsense is a good indicator that he doesnt have a clue what he is talking about. I'm pretty sure Fred Beckey would fall into his beginner category at this stage of his life. Fred has probably logged more climbing time than any other American climber...ever. He just happens to be in his late 80's now...I think.
It is fine if you disagree with me, but please offer an alternative. Also keep in mind that I am referring to the status of a climber's performance level, similar to how you may categorize climbers in a competition. In other words, if you do offer a valid alternative, it must be quantifiable; you will likely also have to assign grades to your categories. (Good luck making everyone happy.)

Many people in this thread are referring to the level of a person's climbing knowledge, which is not at all what I am referring to. I explicitly indicated that am referring to categories for how hard one climbs, their climbing performance level.

There is a difference between one's applicative climbing knowledge and how hard one climbs--the difference between what you and I are referring to.


(This post was edited by Learner on Jul 22, 2011, 3:03 AM)



Edit Log:
Post edited by Learner () on Jul 22, 2011, 2:57 AM
Post edited by Learner () on Jul 22, 2011, 2:59 AM
Post edited by Learner () on Jul 22, 2011, 3:03 AM


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?