Forums: Climbing Information: General: Re: [roughster] Was It Worth It? Circa 2005: Edit Log




Partner camhead


Jan 13, 2012, 3:18 PM

Views: 2224

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [roughster] Was It Worth It? Circa 2005
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  

roughster wrote:
I would be curious as to the general consensus of the few remaining people who frequented this site who were around at that time really feel the shift from signal to noise was a good choice?

Certainly someone got paid, but in the end, I'll be honest, I feel that time has proven the point. I find it interesting that sites most often take their most prolific contributors, make them mods/admins, then ultimately end up splitting ways based upon the catcalls and pettiness of a few non-contributors. A search back to the mudslingers of 2005 show that very few have posted past 2006 and many of them were obviously troll accounts that abruptly quit contributing once their agenda was accomplished.

Is this the cycle of the modern day internet website? I am honestly wondering if a true signal focused website actually has a chance at success or if the anonymity of the internet and Ring of Gyges just proves too strong of a force?

It's really too bad IMO. RC could've been a contender so to speak. Now? LOL.

I'm not sure I get a lot of your details, but, as someone who has been around for a while, it is my opinion that this site had a great opportunity. Valuable "high profile" users, lively community, the most recognizable climbing-related domain name on the web. And they blew it.

I'm not sure why this is, though. A lot of people would blame it on the current owners of the site, and while they have done nothing to help it, I don't think that they are to blame. At the very least, we owe them gratitude for not letting the site just shut down, which it was near doing a couple years ago.

The reason for this site missing out on opportunities, I think, is a combination large-scale economic factors, of mods/admins fixating on the wrong things, and of too egalitarian of a platform allowing anon noobs and trolls to drown out valuable resources.

Given the right set of decisions made half a decade ago, this site could have been a combination of Deadpoint and Mountain Project. Instead it's basically the men's bathroom of a university climbing wall, combined with a poorly stocked REI climbing gear section.


(This post was edited by camhead on Jan 13, 2012, 3:20 PM)



Edit Log:
Post edited by camhead () on Jan 13, 2012, 3:20 PM


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?