Forums: Climbing Information: General:
5.12?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


rtwilli4


May 11, 2009, 2:25 PM
Post #1 of 100 (4434 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

5.12?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad climbers, whatever you are.

I climb a bit of trad and am trying to get more into it now that I'm back in the states for the summer. I have put up new routes and climb a lot of adventure multi-pitch but most of you would still consider me a "sport climber." It doesn't matter really what you call me, I just like to climb.

Redpointing a .12 has never been something that I set my sights on too heavily, and I have never actually sent a .12 at a high profile place in the states. Now, I have sent 7a+ and tried a few 7b's and 7b+'s that I know I will get when I get back to Asia in the fall. There is a .12a at the Red that I'll send in the fall as well. But the grades are all over the place now a days, and the one at the red is admittedly soft but its fun. Sometimes it's hard to find a .12a that really feels like a 5.12, which may be why I get on more .12b's and .12c's. Of course I'll be in Rifle soon and that will all change.


My point is, I have never actually worked a .12a. I have worked .12b's (7b) and 12c's because the line was so amazing, but it was not for the grade. I'll send them eventually, and I'll send a real .12a eventually, but I have much more important goals like putting up more new routes next year in Asia, climbing more trad this summer, and climbing at as many places as I can over the next few years. My home state of NC, Utah, The Valley, El Potrero, and everywhere inbetween. I also want to boulder more, spend time with friends at the Red and the New, and work as little as possible.

How does this compare to all you normal climbers out there... sport or not... who don't climb 5.12. Maybe you are really close, maybe you are not. Either way, how important is it?


(This post was edited by rtwilli4 on May 11, 2009, 2:26 PM)


rock_fencer


May 11, 2009, 2:33 PM
Post #2 of 100 (4411 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 7, 2005
Posts: 752

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ive climbed mostly in the northeast and then So. ILL. basically im a gear guy, ive onsighted harder on trad than sport and climb mid 11 to hard 11's on both. Ive always had the desire to climb 12s but i despise training and im currently content with being able to climb 5.10 gear routes everywhere i have been.

maybe one day i'll care enough to get into shape enough to climb 12s but i enjoy climbing at the level i do. I just want to get to more places


guangzhou


May 11, 2009, 2:36 PM
Post #3 of 100 (4404 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad climbers, whatever you are.

I climb a bit of trad and am trying to get more into it now that I'm back in the states for the summer. I have put up new routes and climb a lot of adventure multi-pitch but most of you would still consider me a "sport climber." It doesn't matter really what you call me, I just like to climb.

Redpointing a .12 has never been something that I set my sights on too heavily, and I have never actually sent a .12 at a high profile place in the states. Now, I have sent 7a+ and tried a few 7b's and 7b+'s that I know I will get when I get back to Asia in the fall. There is a .12a at the Red that I'll send in the fall as well. But the grades are all over the place now a days, and the one at the red is admittedly soft but its fun. Sometimes it's hard to find a .12a that really feels like a 5.12, which may be why I get on more .12b's and .12c's. Of course I'll be in Rifle soon and that will all change.


My point is, I have never actually worked a .12a. I have worked .12b's (7b) and 12c's because the line was so amazing, but it was not for the grade. I'll send them eventually, and I'll send a real .12a eventually, but I have much more important goals like putting up more new routes next year in Asia, climbing more trad this summer, and climbing at as many places as I can over the next few years. My home state of NC, Utah, The Valley, El Potrero, and everywhere inbetween. I also want to boulder more, spend time with friends at the Red and the New, and work as little as possible.

How does this compare to all you normal climbers out there... sport or not... who don't climb 5.12. Maybe you are really close, maybe you are not. Either way, how important is it?

I live and Asia and I put up a lot of routes in the region. Currently I am in INdonesia. When you're back this way, let me know, maybe we can hook up. As you know, Asia isn't that big.

Where have you been developing routes?

As for climbing a certain grade, who cares. Are you having fun? That's what matters.


USnavy


May 11, 2009, 2:50 PM
Post #4 of 100 (4385 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

I believe 5.12 is a big deal to some intermediate sport climbers because it seems 5.12 is the limit the average regular climber can reach. It seems that breaking into 5.12+ and beyond requires heavy dedication to the point where it may be considered an obsession. A simple one evening a week approach will not cut it for most to make it into 12+ and beyond.

At the moment my long-term (nine months) goal is to RP a 5.13-. At the moment I am still working on 5.12. In a few weeks I will be starting my first 5.12c project. The more I push into harder 5.12's the more I am finding that it requires a higher level of dedication well beyond what the average climber is willing to put fourth. I would feel comfortable saying the increase in dedication for me to go from 5.12b to 12c is about what was required for me to go from 11a to c/d. I am finding that I have to push myself to the absolute max to make it to the next 5.12 grade.

So like I said, I think some view it as a big deal because it seems that in order to pass the 5.12 benchmark the climber needs to bump up their dedication to the sport well beyond what would be considered normal by some. But then again it’s all relative. There are some that can climb 5.12 without breaking a sweat and there are some that will never climb 5.12.


(This post was edited by USnavy on May 11, 2009, 2:59 PM)


kennoyce


May 11, 2009, 2:52 PM
Post #5 of 100 (4379 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2001
Posts: 1338

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I generally consider myself a trad climber. In reality, I probably climb about half sport, half trad, but I enjoy trad more than sport. As someone who enjoys trad more than sport, I have never redpointed a .12 trad line, I think my hardest trad redpoint is like .11c.

Sport climbing I have redpointed several 5.12's but my problem is that I don't project very many routes. I personally enjoy climbing in many different places, and I will usually always try and go to a new area, or just climb a route that I have never climbed before. Because of this all of my hard redpoints have been on second or third try, and I have never projected a route more than that. I'm sure that I could redpoint a 5.13 with a month of work, but that's just not the way I do it.

Basically what I am trying to say is that I go for more mileage when climbing than for the hard redpoints. I do enjoy the feeling of accomplishment when I do redpoint something hard, but more than that I just enjoy a variety of climbing experiences.


coolcat83


May 11, 2009, 3:01 PM
Post #6 of 100 (4368 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2007
Posts: 1007

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It will always evolve, 5.10 was/is hard, then the grades went up as training, technique and technology went up. 5.12 is the new everyman hard, in a few years maybe 5.12 will be the new 5.10, and 5.13/14/15 will be the new everyman hard. to me climbing hard is not as important as enjoying the experience, sometimes pushing the level is the fun in it, overcoming that hardship, tagging a goal. sometimes it's the rest of the experience, some of my most fun days have been on 5.5, just relaxing and getting lost in the rock and placements. I don't think I'll ever climb 5.12, and it doesn't bother me.


lena_chita
Moderator

May 11, 2009, 3:22 PM
Post #7 of 100 (4342 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad climbers, whatever you are.
?

It's as big, or as small a deal as you make it for yourself.

IMO 5.12 is when a lot of areas get opened up for you.

When you get comfortable on 5.12 -- and I am not talking redpointing your first one, I am talking about willing to get on a climb that is rated 5.12 in a guidebook in a new area, with no beta, and be confident that you would get to the top, even if you don't do it clean on the first go, you would get to the top without a major epic -- then you can climb a lot of lines in almost any area.

Back when I was just starting to climb, I had to comb the guidebook for an area that would have enough climbs in the easy-5.10-and-below range to warrant going there for a day. And then get there and wait in line with all the other climbers like me, climbing those few lines. At the New, there were only couple areas like that-- and we ended up going to the same place every freaking time we went climbing... Here was this whole guidebook full of awesome-looking climbs, and here I was, going to these 3 areas over and over, walking past some amazing-looking rock to climb the less-amazing-looking rock... "I want to climb THAT one"-- that was my motivation.

This is why 5.12 is a big deal for me, even though I am not yet 'comfortable on 5.12' by my own definition.


rock_fencer


May 11, 2009, 3:32 PM
Post #8 of 100 (4322 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 7, 2005
Posts: 752

Re: [lena_chita] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

i wonder if youare refering to 5.12 trad or sport because in my experience once you can crank 10's on gear you are not waiting in line whether its at the gunks, on the granite of NH or NC, and definately not at the RRG.

On the other hand at places like rumney 12's are regularly occupied and a line is often had for top climbs at Waimea wall.


granite_grrl


May 11, 2009, 4:13 PM
Post #9 of 100 (4277 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [rock_fencer] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I just want to climb harder and harder. The grades are just a way to generally guage your process, but aren't the ultimate goal. The goal is to have more areas open to you and more cool lines that you can climb.

As I get better at climbing I keep raising my goals. 5.12 isn't really that big a deal. Right now I'd like to get to that grade because I'm getting closer and closer to climbing it, but it's not the end all be all.


pfwein


May 11, 2009, 4:15 PM
Post #10 of 100 (4272 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2009
Posts: 353

Re: [coolcat83] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In my 15 years of pretty active climbing, I haven't really seen the average climber get any better. The best of the best obviously are, but I think that's mostly a "bell curve" thing (and probably starting younger and gyms play a role also).
Average climber ain't very good and probably never will be. In a way, he/she seems worse now b/c he's further away from the top.


Partner camhead


May 11, 2009, 4:31 PM
Post #11 of 100 (4254 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [pfwein] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.


apeman_e


May 11, 2009, 4:42 PM
Post #12 of 100 (4227 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2008
Posts: 212

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

5.12 isn't a goal of mine, because I'm not really a project person. My favorite part of climbing is the adventure and the sense of heading into the unknown. I've seconded bolted 12's where I realized I could train and increase my endurance and learn all the little "tricks" on the climb if I wanted to project the line. Instead, I am content to have to rest on top rope several times to struggle up the climb, and then leave it be.

I really enjoy onsighting. It's the same reason why I don't boulder harder, because I don't work the same shit over and over. I much prefer to search out a boulder I haven't climbed before and spend a day on it, and move on. As a result, I'll probably never send 5.12. I will always SUCK, but I really LOVE climbing the way I do.


rtwilli4


May 11, 2009, 5:27 PM
Post #13 of 100 (4168 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [guangzhou] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

guangzhou wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad climbers, whatever you are.

I climb a bit of trad and am trying to get more into it now that I'm back in the states for the summer. I have put up new routes and climb a lot of adventure multi-pitch but most of you would still consider me a "sport climber." It doesn't matter really what you call me, I just like to climb.

Redpointing a .12 has never been something that I set my sights on too heavily, and I have never actually sent a .12 at a high profile place in the states. Now, I have sent 7a+ and tried a few 7b's and 7b+'s that I know I will get when I get back to Asia in the fall. There is a .12a at the Red that I'll send in the fall as well. But the grades are all over the place now a days, and the one at the red is admittedly soft but its fun. Sometimes it's hard to find a .12a that really feels like a 5.12, which may be why I get on more .12b's and .12c's. Of course I'll be in Rifle soon and that will all change.


My point is, I have never actually worked a .12a. I have worked .12b's (7b) and 12c's because the line was so amazing, but it was not for the grade. I'll send them eventually, and I'll send a real .12a eventually, but I have much more important goals like putting up more new routes next year in Asia, climbing more trad this summer, and climbing at as many places as I can over the next few years. My home state of NC, Utah, The Valley, El Potrero, and everywhere inbetween. I also want to boulder more, spend time with friends at the Red and the New, and work as little as possible.

How does this compare to all you normal climbers out there... sport or not... who don't climb 5.12. Maybe you are really close, maybe you are not. Either way, how important is it?

I live and Asia and I put up a lot of routes in the region. Currently I am in INdonesia. When you're back this way, let me know, maybe we can hook up. As you know, Asia isn't that big.

Where have you been developing routes?

As for climbing a certain grade, who cares. Are you having fun? That's what matters.

I have mostly been putting up stuff on Koh Phi Phi in Thailand... not because it's the best climbing in the world but because I have a lot of good friends there and me and my girlfriend can live and work there. Some of the best moderate multi-pitch climbing in Thailand has rusted away on PP, so I plan to spend a lot of time next year rebolting. I also have plans for a few brand new areas there, as well as rebolting what will again be the tallest climb in Thailand and maybe all of SE Asia. I would also love to do some development down in Malaysia... loads of potential there and amazing people.

It will all depend on how many bolts we can get next year. We have decided to stop using stainless bolts and only use titanium from now on, because stainless in southern Thailand lasts less than 10 years, with some bolts lasting less than two. Malaysia is more dependent on time and partners than bolts, because expansion bolts seem to work there.

Shoot me an email... ryan.tyler.williams@gmail.com.

I am still learning when it comes to development, and am always looking for experienced partners.


rtwilli4


May 11, 2009, 5:29 PM
Post #14 of 100 (4163 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

This is probably the main reason I care to climb harder than I do now. Currently I need a pitch of easy .11 as a warm up... I would like to get out of that crowd. Nowadays if you are at a popular place, climbing .10s just means you're surrounded by gym rat morons.


boadman


May 11, 2009, 7:44 PM
Post #15 of 100 (4085 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 7, 2003
Posts: 726

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

For me, it's always been about the line. When I started climbing I lived near Rumney. There are a lot of pretty aesthetic lines there, and it was pretty natural to progress through the grades in search of the next cool move. I started on Yoda, which is a beautiful 5.9. The next route I thought looked really cool was lonesome dove, a 10a. A couple of years later, Social Outcast caught my eye, and suddenly I was on 12s. It's always been the same, whether it's a trad line, a boulder problem, or a sport route. Aesthetic moves, or a feature will intrigue me, and I'll get on the route. Numbers are just a convenient way to decide how long it will take me to get to the top.


mar_leclerc


May 11, 2009, 9:38 PM
Post #16 of 100 (3997 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I climb all over the place, in grades, not location. I can flash V5s and climb V8 boulders after a day of roped climbing. I have nearly 'soloed' 5.13a above a trapeze net (young blood in Squamish) and yet fell leading 'Apron Strings' a 10b the same day on my OS attempt. If I am climbing a 5.12 trad route and I am falling a lot I usually just pull on a peice of gear to get to the top.. unless its single pitch. Whatever, I dont care. I just enjoy myself...


guangzhou


May 12, 2009, 12:22 AM
Post #17 of 100 (3941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
guangzhou wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad climbers, whatever you are.

I climb a bit of trad and am trying to get more into it now that I'm back in the states for the summer. I have put up new routes and climb a lot of adventure multi-pitch but most of you would still consider me a "sport climber." It doesn't matter really what you call me, I just like to climb.

Redpointing a .12 has never been something that I set my sights on too heavily, and I have never actually sent a .12 at a high profile place in the states. Now, I have sent 7a+ and tried a few 7b's and 7b+'s that I know I will get when I get back to Asia in the fall. There is a .12a at the Red that I'll send in the fall as well. But the grades are all over the place now a days, and the one at the red is admittedly soft but its fun. Sometimes it's hard to find a .12a that really feels like a 5.12, which may be why I get on more .12b's and .12c's. Of course I'll be in Rifle soon and that will all change.


My point is, I have never actually worked a .12a. I have worked .12b's (7b) and 12c's because the line was so amazing, but it was not for the grade. I'll send them eventually, and I'll send a real .12a eventually, but I have much more important goals like putting up more new routes next year in Asia, climbing more trad this summer, and climbing at as many places as I can over the next few years. My home state of NC, Utah, The Valley, El Potrero, and everywhere inbetween. I also want to boulder more, spend time with friends at the Red and the New, and work as little as possible.

How does this compare to all you normal climbers out there... sport or not... who don't climb 5.12. Maybe you are really close, maybe you are not. Either way, how important is it?

I live and Asia and I put up a lot of routes in the region. Currently I am in INdonesia. When you're back this way, let me know, maybe we can hook up. As you know, Asia isn't that big.

Where have you been developing routes?

As for climbing a certain grade, who cares. Are you having fun? That's what matters.

I have mostly been putting up stuff on Koh Phi Phi in Thailand... not because it's the best climbing in the world but because I have a lot of good friends there and me and my girlfriend can live and work there. Some of the best moderate multi-pitch climbing in Thailand has rusted away on PP, so I plan to spend a lot of time next year rebolting. I also have plans for a few brand new areas there, as well as rebolting what will again be the tallest climb in Thailand and maybe all of SE Asia. I would also love to do some development down in Malaysia... loads of potential there and amazing people.

It will all depend on how many bolts we can get next year. We have decided to stop using stainless bolts and only use titanium from now on, because stainless in southern Thailand lasts less than 10 years, with some bolts lasting less than two. Malaysia is more dependent on time and partners than bolts, because expansion bolts seem to work there.

Shoot me an email... ryan.tyler.williams@gmail.com.

I am still learning when it comes to development, and am always looking for experienced partners.

Thanks for the reply. I love climbing in Thailand, but I have not hit Phi phi yet. I will, maybe during Christmas break actually.

As for development in Malaysia, well I have to agree. I am keeping my eyes open when it come to the American International School of Malaysia in KL. Once they have a opening I like, I do everything I can to get the posting.

Bolts in Asia, that is the hard part isn't it. Good call on going with Tatanium, Southern Thailand needs it.

So, how many routes on Phi phi now?


rtwilli4


May 12, 2009, 1:45 AM
Post #18 of 100 (3903 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [guangzhou] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

guangzhou wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
guangzhou wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad climbers, whatever you are.

I climb a bit of trad and am trying to get more into it now that I'm back in the states for the summer. I have put up new routes and climb a lot of adventure multi-pitch but most of you would still consider me a "sport climber." It doesn't matter really what you call me, I just like to climb.

Redpointing a .12 has never been something that I set my sights on too heavily, and I have never actually sent a .12 at a high profile place in the states. Now, I have sent 7a+ and tried a few 7b's and 7b+'s that I know I will get when I get back to Asia in the fall. There is a .12a at the Red that I'll send in the fall as well. But the grades are all over the place now a days, and the one at the red is admittedly soft but its fun. Sometimes it's hard to find a .12a that really feels like a 5.12, which may be why I get on more .12b's and .12c's. Of course I'll be in Rifle soon and that will all change.


My point is, I have never actually worked a .12a. I have worked .12b's (7b) and 12c's because the line was so amazing, but it was not for the grade. I'll send them eventually, and I'll send a real .12a eventually, but I have much more important goals like putting up more new routes next year in Asia, climbing more trad this summer, and climbing at as many places as I can over the next few years. My home state of NC, Utah, The Valley, El Potrero, and everywhere inbetween. I also want to boulder more, spend time with friends at the Red and the New, and work as little as possible.

How does this compare to all you normal climbers out there... sport or not... who don't climb 5.12. Maybe you are really close, maybe you are not. Either way, how important is it?

I live and Asia and I put up a lot of routes in the region. Currently I am in INdonesia. When you're back this way, let me know, maybe we can hook up. As you know, Asia isn't that big.

Where have you been developing routes?

As for climbing a certain grade, who cares. Are you having fun? That's what matters.

I have mostly been putting up stuff on Koh Phi Phi in Thailand... not because it's the best climbing in the world but because I have a lot of good friends there and me and my girlfriend can live and work there. Some of the best moderate multi-pitch climbing in Thailand has rusted away on PP, so I plan to spend a lot of time next year rebolting. I also have plans for a few brand new areas there, as well as rebolting what will again be the tallest climb in Thailand and maybe all of SE Asia. I would also love to do some development down in Malaysia... loads of potential there and amazing people.

It will all depend on how many bolts we can get next year. We have decided to stop using stainless bolts and only use titanium from now on, because stainless in southern Thailand lasts less than 10 years, with some bolts lasting less than two. Malaysia is more dependent on time and partners than bolts, because expansion bolts seem to work there.

Shoot me an email... ryan.tyler.williams@gmail.com.

I am still learning when it comes to development, and am always looking for experienced partners.

Thanks for the reply. I love climbing in Thailand, but I have not hit Phi phi yet. I will, maybe during Christmas break actually.

As for development in Malaysia, well I have to agree. I am keeping my eyes open when it come to the American International School of Malaysia in KL. Once they have a opening I like, I do everything I can to get the posting.

Bolts in Asia, that is the hard part isn't it. Good call on going with Tatanium, Southern Thailand needs it.

So, how many routes on Phi phi now?

There is still less than 100 lines on the island. I work there as a guide and that takes up most of my time time. There is a guy named Shamick that has rebolted hundreds of routes in Thailand and he kind of runs the bolting effort since all of the gear is his, along with the donation money for bolts. We haven't been able to get a lot of bolts so last year a few new climbs went up on Tonsai Tower, which is the main area. One of them is 55 meters and one of the best climbs on the island. A guy named Magnus has also put up a few climbs in the past few years that aren't in the books. One being a 7b, the hardest on Tonsai Tower.

Other than that, most of the bolts I've put in are on old climbs that had wasted away, or ones that had only been done on gear and never bolted. A few pitches at HinTak were done on gear for the first time in over 10 years, and then bolted.

Most of the development (and the only hard stuff) that has been going on has been DWS. There is unlimited potential on the island and we have been trying to put in bolts up high to take pictures from.

We are supposed to be getting a lot of titanium bolts this season so hopefully I will be doing a lot of drilling and climbing new lines on gear.


Partner angry


May 12, 2009, 2:02 AM
Post #19 of 100 (3892 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

Easy for you to say. You're married.


guangzhou


May 12, 2009, 2:55 AM
Post #20 of 100 (3858 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
guangzhou wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
guangzhou wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
I think the other thread got personal but it made me think. How big of a deal is 5.12? To sport climbers, trad

There is still less than 100 lines on the island. I work there as a guide and that takes up most of my time time. There is a guy named Shamick that has rebolted hundreds of routes in Thailand and he kind of runs the bolting effort since all of the gear is his, along with the donation money for bolts. We haven't been able to get a lot of bolts so last year a few new climbs went up on Tonsai Tower, which is the main area. One of them is 55 meters and one of the best climbs on the island. A guy named Magnus has also put up a few climbs in the past few years that aren't in the books. One being a 7b, the hardest on Tonsai Tower.

Other than that, most of the bolts I've put in are on old climbs that had wasted away, or ones that had only been done on gear and never bolted. A few pitches at HinTak were done on gear for the first time in over 10 years, and then bolted.

Most of the development (and the only hard stuff) that has been going on has been DWS. There is unlimited potential on the island and we have been trying to put in bolts up high to take pictures from.

We are supposed to be getting a lot of titanium bolts this season so hopefully I will be doing a lot of drilling and climbing new lines on gear.

Thanks for the heads up. I plan a day or two on the island next Christmas break. Looks like I'll be climbing in CHang Mai in September. Ten day trip and Southern Thailand for three weeks in December/January.

I've heard nothing but good things about your little island paradise. Not enough routes yet for me to stay long term, but I can come up a for a few days to escape the crowds and for a change of pace.

How is the guiding there?

E


james481


May 12, 2009, 3:04 AM
Post #21 of 100 (3850 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2007
Posts: 201

Re: [angry] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

Easy for you to say. You're married.

Don't worry Angry, I have a wicked man crush on you if it makes you feel any better... Laugh


rtwilli4


May 12, 2009, 3:14 AM
Post #22 of 100 (3836 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [guangzhou] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Do you mean how do I like guiding there? Or how are the guides? The guides in southern Thailand are hit and miss. The other shop (not mine) will hire anyone! For the most part, there are always two or three guides between the two shops that are competent enough to go and get the latest dumbass who forgot to back clip on the way down the multi-pitch. All of the guides on Phi Phi speak much better English and smoke a lot less weed on the job than the guides in Railey/Tonsai.

I enjoy it. I work a lot, but I can usually wear everyone out as fast as I want so if I'm feeling good, I make sure I get an hour at the end of the day to work on something. I meet people from all over the world and get a lot of invites to come climbing in the wildest places. Hopefully I'll be able to take some of them up soon.

Every once in a while someone really takes to it, and extends their vacation. I've taken a few people from their first time climbing to sending hard 5.10s. It can be rewarding.

I've climbed pretty much everything on the island but there are a few harder .12's that I haven't sent, and a .13b that I hope to rebolt next year. And I never get tired of the multi-pitches where you climb right out of a longtail. For me, living there is about a lot more than just climbing though. It's a very peaceful lifestyle. The beach is my front yard and the crag is my back yard. I can literally throw a rock into the ocean, AND onto the crag, from my front porch.

I go months at a time without watching television, eating processed foods, or even seeing a car or motorbike. I go weeks at a time where the only shoes I wear are my climbing shoes. I couldn't think of a better job :)


(This post was edited by rtwilli4 on May 12, 2009, 3:17 AM)


clausti


May 12, 2009, 3:15 AM
Post #23 of 100 (3833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [angry] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

Easy for you to say. You're married.

to someone who gives excellent second, no less.

I don't think camhead has yet clipped the anchors of something i couldn't follow.


degaine


May 12, 2009, 9:18 AM
Post #24 of 100 (3778 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything.

I would agree with that: anything trad over 5.8/5.9 if it is not a 4 star classic, otherwise over 5.10b or so; for sport (in my experience) over 5.10c should do it.

Instead of "harder" you could insert "bolder" "more run out" "chossy" "less than 2 stars in the guidebook", especially for trad climbs.


camhead wrote:
I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that.

Could you explain? What drama, headache and compromise are you talking about (especially at a sport crag)? I'm not saying you should not climb with who you want to climb with, but I have a good friend / regular crag partner who climbs 5.13/14, and I belay him on what he wants to climb and he on what I'd like to climb at crags where a 5.10 is right next to (or a few yards down from) the harder climbs he likes. Ditto at trad crags like Donner summit where you have a 5.10 chimney next to (you can stand an belay in the same spot for both) a 5.12d thin finger crack.


camhead wrote:
The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

What do 5.12 and clusterfuck-free have to do with each other? I have alpine partners who climb no harder than 5.8 trad who are lightyears more experienced with ropecraft and moving over rock than some 5.12 gym / crag climbers I know.


mikebee


May 12, 2009, 10:55 AM
Post #25 of 100 (3752 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: 190

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

My hardest sport redpoint is 5.11a (or 22 Aussie).
My hardest trad grade is 5.9 onsight. I'm happy enough with both grades, and I reckon that there's a good range of climbs to keep me amused around those two levels.

If I could improve one of these two numbers, it'd be my trad grade. I'd like to get it up to .10c or so, but thats really because there a couple of lines that I'd really like to get on that are about this grade.

I'm not built or destined to be a 5.12 or higher climber, and I have no issues with that at all.


Partner camhead


May 12, 2009, 12:17 PM
Post #26 of 100 (2061 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Degaine,

I am just saying that there is an incredible freedom to your entire group doing one 5.11 warmup, and then progressing right on to harder stuff. None of this "oh, what crag do we go to? So and so wants a 10a, wah wah wah." Not to mention, as I already said, that easier climbs will nearly always have more lines on them, and be more likely to have topropes hung on them.

My two favorite crags, Indian Creek and the Red River Gorge, both have plenty of areas where the entrance fee is 5.11 trad or 5.12 sport.
I don't care how much alpine experience your partner has, is he going to go to a crag where the only stuff he can climb is on flail-TRs?


blueeyedclimber


May 12, 2009, 1:33 PM
Post #27 of 100 (2038 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [mar_leclerc] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mar_leclerc wrote:
I climb all over the place, in grades, not location. I can flash V5s and climb V8 boulders after a day of roped climbing. I have nearly 'soloed' 5.13a above a trapeze net (young blood in Squamish) and yet fell leading 'Apron Strings' a 10b the same day on my OS attempt. If I am climbing a 5.12 trad route and I am falling a lot I usually just pull on a peice of gear to get to the top.. unless its single pitch. Whatever, I dont care. I just enjoy myself...

Are you the one who made the movie that was shown at the Squamish Mountain festival last year? It was pretty good. I wish I had thought of the trapeze first. Tongue

Josh


blueeyedclimber


May 12, 2009, 1:45 PM
Post #28 of 100 (2022 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In response to the op, 5.12 is a goal and there is nothing wrong with striving toward a goal as long as it's a personal one and you are honest with yourself and others. If you search out 5.12's that soft and suit your style just to say you climb 5.12, then you will be cheating yourself and will not be an all around climber.

There are a lot of people that would consider me a 5.12 climber, because when I am in the gym, I throw myself at the hardest routes and keep working them until I send them. When I go outside though, I do not project things and I climb almost exclusively trad. I like to onsight routes and push myself physically and mentally. My long term goal is to climb 5.12 trad. It may be this year, next year, 10 years from now, or maybe never, but it's my goal and I believe it's a realistic one.

When I first started trad, I thought, "If I could climb 5.10, then I would be happy." Now, it's unusual for me not to onsight any 10 anywhere, so I've had to raise my sights. I have only a handful of 5.12 sport and a handful of 5.11 trad under my belt (and by handful, I mean less than 5 of each), but i know I can climb at that grade.

What's more important top me in the long run, however, is that i get to climb amazing lines. It just so happens that one of my criteria for an amazing line is that I am pushed physically, which usually means it is 5.10 or above for trad, and 5.11 and above for sport.

Josh


lena_chita
Moderator

May 12, 2009, 3:19 PM
Post #29 of 100 (1999 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:
camhead wrote:
I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that.

Could you explain? What drama, headache and compromise are you talking about (especially at a sport crag)? I'm not saying you should not climb with who you want to climb with, but I have a good friend / regular crag partner who climbs 5.13/14, and I belay him on what he wants to climb and he on what I'd like to climb at crags where a 5.10 is right next to (or a few yards down from) the harder climbs he likes. Ditto at trad crags like Donner summit where you have a 5.10 chimney next to (you can stand an belay in the same spot for both) a 5.12d thin finger crack.

It is great that you have areas where a 5.10 climber and 5.13 climber can climb side-by-side for a day. Maybe there are more crags out there like these. But in my experience at places like RRG, you usually have a " main" grade for the crag, with couple easier warm-ups, not a big spread. (A pretty common would be something like one or two 5.11s and a bunch of 5.12s-5.13s, or maybe one or two 5.10s and a whole bunch of 5.11-5.12s) In some cases, there is an easier wall within 10-15 minutes walk. In some cases, there isn't. But even a 10-15 min walk back and forth all day starts feeling like a lot of drain when you are trying to work on a project, and your partner is, too, and your projects are not right next to each other.
So a group that climbs 5.10-5.11 can have a choice of places to go, and a group that climbs 5.11-5.12 had a lot of choices to go to, and a group that climbs 5.12-5.13 has even more choices, etc. But a group that has some people climbing 5.9-5.10, and some people climbing 5.12 usually finds themselves limited to just a couple of crags with that spread of the grades within walking distance, and even then it seems not worth going together as a group, but better to just split up according to climbing ability.



degaine wrote:
What do 5.12 and clusterfuck-free have to do with each other? I have alpine partners who climb no harder than 5.8 trad who are lightyears more experienced with ropecraft and moving over rock than some 5.12 gym / crag climbers I know.

Of course there are many experienced climbers who don't pull hard grades, and plenty of climbers who have gotten strong fast in the gym and have no clue whatsoever that they are not in the gym anymore, when they go to a crag.

But somehow when you go to a 5.10 crag, there is a lot of "oh, no, don't pull our tope, so-and-so wants to toprope it, too, but he is right now climbing over there, and that one is our rope, too, and we have three more people who are going to toprope it, and then we are in line for that one over there, after those 8 people are done with it". It seems to be quite common at a 5.10 crag that there is ONE person in the group that can actually lead that route, if barely, and a whole bunch of people who can flail-toprope it, but not lead it. Therefore, there are a lot of toprope epics, each pitch seems to be taking an hour, large groups or clueless people, lots of overall crankiness, etc.

When you go to a 5.12 crag, even if it is quite crowded-- and at the Red 5.12 isn't an elite grade that would guarantee you a no-crowd crag -- everything seems to be moving much smoother. You usually don't hear things like " oh, don't pull that rope, so-and-so wants to toprope it, but only after he finishes the flailing on that other one and rests for a long time, and 3 other people want to, also, but not quite ready yet, and meanwhile, the rope stays put b/c the one person who got to the anchors on that rope isn't at all sure that he can do it again, and no one else in the group can do it either..." What you get at a crowded 5.12 crag instead is something like:"Sure, you can pull the rope and climb on our draws while I'm resting before the next burn. Go ahead!" The groups are generally smaller, the people are more efficient, most people actually can lead the routes they are climbing, instread of relying on one guy to put up topropes for them, or even if toproping for some reason, they are climbing relatively quickly, etc. The atmosphere is somehow different...


rock_ranger


May 12, 2009, 3:33 PM
Post #30 of 100 (1991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: 189

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Anyone in decent shape with relatively good technique/skills and endurance can climb 5.12. It's not a big deal.


Little kids in Europe warm up on .12's..Wink


mar_leclerc


May 12, 2009, 3:34 PM
Post #31 of 100 (2006 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2008
Posts: 156

Re: [blueeyedclimber] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
mar_leclerc wrote:
I climb all over the place, in grades, not location. I can flash V5s and climb V8 boulders after a day of roped climbing. I have nearly 'soloed' 5.13a above a trapeze net (young blood in Squamish) and yet fell leading 'Apron Strings' a 10b the same day on my OS attempt. If I am climbing a 5.12 trad route and I am falling a lot I usually just pull on a peice of gear to get to the top.. unless its single pitch. Whatever, I dont care. I just enjoy myself...

Are you the one who made the movie that was shown at the Squamish Mountain festival last year? It was pretty good. I wish I had thought of the trapeze first. Tongue

Josh

No, that was Matt Maddaloni... I just randomly met him when he was trying that


pfwein


May 12, 2009, 3:56 PM
Post #32 of 100 (1991 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 8, 2009
Posts: 353

Re: [rock_ranger] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No doubt many of them do, but vast majority of climbers there will be climbing intermediate grades (much easier than 5.12), hanging on rope, goofing off, just like US. I know that's true cuz I've seen it.


jcrew


May 12, 2009, 4:28 PM
Post #33 of 100 (1975 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673

Re: [lena_chita] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:

IMO 5.12 is when a lot of areas get opened up for you.

That's the best reason to want to get better at any sport....especially climbing. feeling more solid ups enjoyment of any grade climb. it's like being able to ski anywhere, instead of looking at the trail map.


clews


May 12, 2009, 5:04 PM
Post #34 of 100 (1956 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 10, 2008
Posts: 190

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

5.11+, 5.12 to me is when routes get less busy and a lot more interesting.

By no means is 5.12 my goal, it's just the point in my climbing carreer where I was able to break out of that boring 5.10 funk and get into some good climbing.


bandycoot


May 12, 2009, 5:25 PM
Post #35 of 100 (1932 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 2028

Re: [clews] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think it's funny that America's 5.12 is essentially Europes 8a (5.13b). I think it's more a function of type of rock than anything else though.

Josh


rtwilli4


May 12, 2009, 7:46 PM
Post #36 of 100 (1893 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [lena_chita] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
degaine wrote:
camhead wrote:
I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that.

Could you explain? What drama, headache and compromise are you talking about (especially at a sport crag)? I'm not saying you should not climb with who you want to climb with, but I have a good friend / regular crag partner who climbs 5.13/14, and I belay him on what he wants to climb and he on what I'd like to climb at crags where a 5.10 is right next to (or a few yards down from) the harder climbs he likes. Ditto at trad crags like Donner summit where you have a 5.10 chimney next to (you can stand an belay in the same spot for both) a 5.12d thin finger crack.

It is great that you have areas where a 5.10 climber and 5.13 climber can climb side-by-side for a day. Maybe there are more crags out there like these. But in my experience at places like RRG, you usually have a " main" grade for the crag, with couple easier warm-ups, not a big spread. (A pretty common would be something like one or two 5.11s and a bunch of 5.12s-5.13s, or maybe one or two 5.10s and a whole bunch of 5.11-5.12s) In some cases, there is an easier wall within 10-15 minutes walk. In some cases, there isn't. But even a 10-15 min walk back and forth all day starts feeling like a lot of drain when you are trying to work on a project, and your partner is, too, and your projects are not right next to each other.
So a group that climbs 5.10-5.11 can have a choice of places to go, and a group that climbs 5.11-5.12 had a lot of choices to go to, and a group that climbs 5.12-5.13 has even more choices, etc. But a group that has some people climbing 5.9-5.10, and some people climbing 5.12 usually finds themselves limited to just a couple of crags with that spread of the grades within walking distance, and even then it seems not worth going together as a group, but better to just split up according to climbing ability.



degaine wrote:
What do 5.12 and clusterfuck-free have to do with each other? I have alpine partners who climb no harder than 5.8 trad who are lightyears more experienced with ropecraft and moving over rock than some 5.12 gym / crag climbers I know.

Of course there are many experienced climbers who don't pull hard grades, and plenty of climbers who have gotten strong fast in the gym and have no clue whatsoever that they are not in the gym anymore, when they go to a crag.

But somehow when you go to a 5.10 crag, there is a lot of "oh, no, don't pull our tope, so-and-so wants to toprope it, too, but he is right now climbing over there, and that one is our rope, too, and we have three more people who are going to toprope it, and then we are in line for that one over there, after those 8 people are done with it". It seems to be quite common at a 5.10 crag that there is ONE person in the group that can actually lead that route, if barely, and a whole bunch of people who can flail-toprope it, but not lead it. Therefore, there are a lot of toprope epics, each pitch seems to be taking an hour, large groups or clueless people, lots of overall crankiness, etc.

When you go to a 5.12 crag, even if it is quite crowded-- and at the Red 5.12 isn't an elite grade that would guarantee you a no-crowd crag -- everything seems to be moving much smoother. You usually don't hear things like " oh, don't pull that rope, so-and-so wants to toprope it, but only after he finishes the flailing on that other one and rests for a long time, and 3 other people want to, also, but not quite ready yet, and meanwhile, the rope stays put b/c the one person who got to the anchors on that rope isn't at all sure that he can do it again, and no one else in the group can do it either..." What you get at a crowded 5.12 crag instead is something like:"Sure, you can pull the rope and climb on our draws while I'm resting before the next burn. Go ahead!" The groups are generally smaller, the people are more efficient, most people actually can lead the routes they are climbing, instread of relying on one guy to put up topropes for them, or even if toproping for some reason, they are climbing relatively quickly, etc. The atmosphere is somehow different...

I completely understand and agree with most of what you are saying. the "5.10" crags can be a bit annoying. Of course... you climb at the Red all the time, where almost EVERYONE is annoying. I think if you hit a few other places, you'll see that most of them do have a good variety of grades, as well as different types of climbing. The Red is just steep pocket pulling madness... it's all the same... at EVERY wall. Don't get me wrong, I love it there and it's a great place to pull hard and get strong but I thank the Lord every time I go there that it is not my home crag. Maybe you should try something New!


justroberto


May 12, 2009, 7:51 PM
Post #37 of 100 (1884 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [rtwilli4] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rtwilli4 wrote:
Maybe you should try something New!


I see what you did there, and I don't like it one bit, nosiree.


lena_chita
Moderator

May 12, 2009, 7:57 PM
Post #38 of 100 (1880 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [justroberto] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:
rtwilli4 wrote:
Maybe you should try something New!


I see what you did there, and I don't like it one bit, nosiree.


New is good, too, but other than the fact that at the New 5.12 is more technical, everything else still applies. Have you been at Summersville lake recently, LOL?


justroberto


May 12, 2009, 9:19 PM
Post #39 of 100 (1858 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [lena_chita] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Good lord, it's a nuisance being a "mere" 10 climber at Summersville, at least on the weekend. Since I've moved far, far away it doesn't really matter to me any more, but I'd still like to encourage people as little as possible...


olive


May 13, 2009, 3:02 AM
Post #40 of 100 (1818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 6, 2003
Posts: 599

Re: [justroberto] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.


jt512


May 13, 2009, 3:13 AM
Post #41 of 100 (1812 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [olive] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

olive wrote:
I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.

If you use the word "amazing" more than about once a month, then it is almost certain that there is nothing actually amazing about what you are talking about.

jay


olive


May 13, 2009, 3:23 AM
Post #42 of 100 (1802 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 6, 2003
Posts: 599

Re: [jt512] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'll keep that in mind for the remainder of the month :))

[I meant good looking lines. I wouldnt know how they are if I cannot do them anyway. But some routes just are more aesthetic looking than others, and that is a motivator for me.]


jakedatc


May 13, 2009, 3:31 AM
Post #43 of 100 (1797 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [jcrew] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jcrew wrote:
lena_chita wrote:

IMO 5.12 is when a lot of areas get opened up for you.

That's the best reason to want to get better at any sport....especially climbing. feeling more solid ups enjoyment of any grade climb. it's like being able to ski anywhere, instead of looking at the trail map.

YES! that was my goal for skiing and turned to climbing too. Though i'm a bit rusty at the skiing and not quite solidly there in climbing yet. done a few .12's but not enough. Skiing i've done alot of double diamonds but nothing insanely steep or technical.

at Rumney climbing over .10b escapes you from the insanity for the most part. over .11 and unless you're really after certain lines then you're golden. over .12 you're home free minus a few really popular routes.


guangzhou


May 13, 2009, 3:44 AM
Post #44 of 100 (1793 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [jakedatc] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I agree with what you say about Rumney, and I think that the same in most crags I visit.


Eman


curt


May 13, 2009, 3:52 AM
Post #45 of 100 (1789 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [olive] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

olive wrote:
I'll keep that in mind for the remainder of the month :))

[I meant good looking lines. I wouldnt know how they are if I cannot do them anyway. But some routes just are more aesthetic looking than others, and that is a motivator for me.]

Hey Olive, pay little attention to Jay--he's not all that amazing. Cool

Curt


jt512


May 13, 2009, 4:07 AM
Post #46 of 100 (1780 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [curt] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
olive wrote:
I'll keep that in mind for the remainder of the month :))

[I meant good looking lines. I wouldnt know how they are if I cannot do them anyway. But some routes just are more aesthetic looking than others, and that is a motivator for me.]

Hey Olive, pay little attention to Jay--he's not all that amazing. Cool

Curt

It's actually gotten to the point where I'd rather hear "dude" twice in one sentence than "amazing" even once.

Don't get me started on "ramp up" or "at the end of the day."

Jay


curt


May 13, 2009, 4:18 AM
Post #47 of 100 (1778 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [jt512] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
curt wrote:
olive wrote:
I'll keep that in mind for the remainder of the month :))

[I meant good looking lines. I wouldnt know how they are if I cannot do them anyway. But some routes just are more aesthetic looking than others, and that is a motivator for me.]

Hey Olive, pay little attention to Jay--he's not all that amazing. Cool

Curt

It's actually gotten to the point where I'd rather hear "dude" twice in one sentence than "amazing" even once.

Don't get me started on "ramp up" or "at the end of the day."

Jay

Dude, at the end of the day it's all good. I wish I could have worked "ramp up" in there somewhere, but that would have been a real stretch.

Curt


Myxomatosis


May 13, 2009, 4:21 AM
Post #48 of 100 (1774 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063

Re: [curt] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
jt512 wrote:
curt wrote:
olive wrote:
I'll keep that in mind for the remainder of the month :))

[I meant good looking lines. I wouldnt know how they are if I cannot do them anyway. But some routes just are more aesthetic looking than others, and that is a motivator for me.]

Hey Olive, pay little attention to Jay--he's not all that amazing. Cool

Curt

It's actually gotten to the point where I'd rather hear "dude" twice in one sentence than "amazing" even once.

Don't get me started on "ramp up" or "at the end of the day."

Jay

Dude, at the end of the day it's all good. I wish I could have worked "ramp up" in there somewhere, but that would have been a real stretch.

Curt

Dude! your totally amazing with your lyrical skills...


jt512


May 13, 2009, 5:04 AM
Post #49 of 100 (1746 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [curt] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

curt wrote:
jt512 wrote:
curt wrote:
olive wrote:
I'll keep that in mind for the remainder of the month :))

[I meant good looking lines. I wouldnt know how they are if I cannot do them anyway. But some routes just are more aesthetic looking than others, and that is a motivator for me.]

Hey Olive, pay little attention to Jay--he's not all that amazing. Cool

Curt

It's actually gotten to the point where I'd rather hear "dude" twice in one sentence than "amazing" even once.

Don't get me started on "ramp up" or "at the end of the day."

Jay

Dude, at the end of the day it's all good.

Curt

"Dude, at the end of the day it's all good, Dude."

Obviously, you're...er...your not from Southern California.

Jay


Partner camhead


May 13, 2009, 12:31 PM
Post #50 of 100 (1716 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [jt512] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
olive wrote:
I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.

If you use the word "amazing" more than about once a month, then it is almost certain that there is nothing actually amazing about what you are talking about.

jay

Well, Olive climbs mostly at the Red. I think that the word "amazing" is quite appropriate in describing the lines there, especially when compared to your SoCal choss, Jay.

ZING!


lena_chita
Moderator

May 13, 2009, 1:58 PM
Post #51 of 100 (2127 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
olive wrote:
I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.

If you use the word "amazing" more than about once a month, then it is almost certain that there is nothing actually amazing about what you are talking about.

jay

Well, Olive climbs mostly at the Red. I think that the word "amazing" is quite appropriate in describing the lines there, especially when compared to your SoCal choss, Jay.

ZING!

Dude, at the end of the day, isn't JTree the most amazing-looking pile of unclimable rock?


Partner angry


May 13, 2009, 2:07 PM
Post #52 of 100 (2118 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [lena_chita] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
olive wrote:
I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.

If you use the word "amazing" more than about once a month, then it is almost certain that there is nothing actually amazing about what you are talking about.

jay

Well, Olive climbs mostly at the Red. I think that the word "amazing" is quite appropriate in describing the lines there, especially when compared to your SoCal choss, Jay.

ZING!

Dude, at the end of the day, isn't JTree the most amazing-looking pile of unclimable rock?

I found a "red" sport route on the Front Range yesterday. 30 degrees overhung, mostly jugs, and old school bolting. 12a and really awesome. Better than the red in a way because you start with a hanging belay right off a river and it's perfect granite. Too bad there's only one sport route that good in 200 miles.

Back to jamming nearly perfect cracks and placing gear for me.


Jnclk


May 13, 2009, 2:07 PM
Post #53 of 100 (2117 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2007
Posts: 89

Re: [rock_ranger] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rock_ranger wrote:
Anyone in decent shape with relatively good technique/skills and endurance can climb 5.12. It's not a big deal.


Little kids in Europe warm up on .12's..Wink

I wouldn't consider hangdogging a 5.12 sport line or flopping around on TR a big deal either. However, I don't see too many people onsighting 5.12 gear lines.


jt512


May 13, 2009, 7:16 PM
Post #54 of 100 (2068 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [angry] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

angry wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
olive wrote:
I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.

If you use the word "amazing" more than about once a month, then it is almost certain that there is nothing actually amazing about what you are talking about.

jay

Well, Olive climbs mostly at the Red. I think that the word "amazing" is quite appropriate in describing the lines there, especially when compared to your SoCal choss, Jay.

ZING!

Dude, at the end of the day, isn't JTree the most amazing-looking pile of unclimable rock?

I found a "red" sport route on the Front Range yesterday. 30 degrees overhung, mostly jugs, and old school bolting. 12a and really awesome.

Thanks for reminding me about "awesome."

Jay


hafilax


May 13, 2009, 7:31 PM
Post #55 of 100 (2060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [jt512] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Are you going to put a list of words you don't like into the killfile project? I'm sure you could use some kind of thesaurus algorithm to find/replace. Tongue


Partner angry


May 13, 2009, 8:06 PM
Post #56 of 100 (2050 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405

Re: [jt512] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
angry wrote:
lena_chita wrote:
camhead wrote:
jt512 wrote:
olive wrote:
I am with Lena on this: I would like to climb harder so I can have the ability and freedom to get on more amazing lines. The lower the grade you climb at, the more limited are your options.
Plus where I climb regularly, at the Red, there are so many amazing lines at 5.12 level that it is impossible for me not to want to climb 5.12.

If you use the word "amazing" more than about once a month, then it is almost certain that there is nothing actually amazing about what you are talking about.

jay

Well, Olive climbs mostly at the Red. I think that the word "amazing" is quite appropriate in describing the lines there, especially when compared to your SoCal choss, Jay.

ZING!

Dude, at the end of the day, isn't JTree the most amazing-looking pile of unclimable rock?

I found a "red" sport route on the Front Range yesterday. 30 degrees overhung, mostly jugs, and old school bolting. 12a and really awesome.

Thanks for reminding me about "awesome."

Jay

It truly was though, I've probably never used that term to describe a sport route before. I believe I meant it.


elcapinyoazz


May 13, 2009, 8:24 PM
Post #57 of 100 (2040 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Posts: 93

Re: [angry] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

Look dude, at the end of the day, it is what it is. We're gradually ramping up our spring training program, increasing the intensity daily. So far the turnout is amazing, and all the feedback says it's splitter, brah.


jt512


May 13, 2009, 10:18 PM
Post #58 of 100 (2001 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [hafilax] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hafilax wrote:
Are you going to put a list of words you don't like into the killfile project?

A word replacement filter...hmmm.

s/(amazing|awesome)/high quality/g
s/at the end of the day/in the end/g
s/dude/sir/g
s/your/you're/g #Right more often than not
s/raping/rapping/g
s/majid_sabet wrote.*$//gs

(Now we'll see who the real nerds are.)

Jay


(This post was edited by jt512 on May 13, 2009, 10:42 PM)


james481


May 13, 2009, 11:52 PM
Post #59 of 100 (1966 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2007
Posts: 201

Re: [jt512] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Are you going to put a list of words you don't like into the killfile project?

A word replacement filter...hmmm.

s/(amazing|awesome)/high quality/g
s/at the end of the day/in the end/g
s/dude/sir/g
s/your/you're/g #Right more often than not
s/raping/rapping/g
s/majid_sabet wrote.*$//gs

(Now we'll see who the real nerds are.)

Jay

Heh, put that in your js and watch as Infernal Exploder chews on every page for like ten minutes trying to figure out the regular expressions... not that I necessarily think knowing regex makes one a real nerd... right? right?!? Wink


bill413


May 14, 2009, 2:55 AM
Post #60 of 100 (1944 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [james481] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

james481 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Are you going to put a list of words you don't like into the killfile project?

A word replacement filter...hmmm.

s/(amazing|awesome)/high quality/g
s/at the end of the day/in the end/g
s/dude/sir/g
s/your/you're/g #Right more often than not
s/raping/rapping/g
s/majid_sabet wrote.*$//gs

(Now we'll see who the real nerds are.)

Jay

Heh, put that in your js and watch as Infernal Exploder chews on every page for like ten minutes trying to figure out the regular expressions... not that I necessarily think knowing regex makes one a real nerd... right? right?!? Wink
Don't you want to make that case insensitive?


jt512


May 14, 2009, 4:16 AM
Post #61 of 100 (1947 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [bill413] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
james481 wrote:
jt512 wrote:
hafilax wrote:
Are you going to put a list of words you don't like into the killfile project?

A word replacement filter...hmmm.

s/(amazing|awesome)/high quality/g
s/at the end of the day/in the end/g
s/dude/sir/g
s/your/you're/g #Right more often than not
s/raping/rapping/g
s/majid_sabet wrote.*$//gs

(Now we'll see who the real nerds are.)

Jay

Heh, put that in your js and watch as Infernal Exploder chews on every page for like ten minutes trying to figure out the regular expressions... not that I necessarily think knowing regex makes one a real nerd... right? right?!? Wink
Don't you want to make that case insensitive?

No. I think I need separate expressions for the capitalized and uncapitalized cases.

Regardless, for even thinking of the case issue you've proved your nerd-worthiness.

Jay


degaine


May 18, 2009, 12:14 PM
Post #62 of 100 (1859 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Degaine,
I am just saying that there is an incredible freedom to your entire group doing one 5.11 warmup, and then progressing right on to harder stuff. None of this "oh, what crag do we go to? So and so wants a 10a, wah wah wah."
Not to mention, as I already said, that easier climbs will nearly always have more lines on them, and be more likely to have topropes hung on them.
My two favorite crags, Indian Creek and the Red River Gorge, both have plenty of areas where the entrance fee is 5.11 trad or 5.12 sport.

I think it’s a question of geography and the group of people with whom we climb. The areas I have frequented regularly in the past and near where I currently live allow two people of significantly different climbing abilities to climb together.


camhead wrote:
I don't care how much alpine experience your partner has, is he going to go to a crag where the only stuff he can climb is on flail-TRs?

I thought that your “clusterfuck” comment was with regard to rope handling skills, but I see by your response that you were referring to crowded climbs with groups on toprope monopolizing a given climb. Again, a difference in geography I suppose as this sort of situation rarely if ever occurs in areas where I have regularly climbed and currently climb.

lena_chita wrote:
It is great that you have areas where a 5.10 climber and 5.13 climber can climb side-by-side for a day. Maybe there are more crags out there like these. But in my experience at places like RRG,

Yes, I believe that it is a question of personal experience relative to the places where each of us respectively climb.


lena_chita wrote:
But somehow when you go to a 5.10 crag, there is a lot of "oh, no, don't pull our tope, so-and-so wants to toprope it, too, but he is right now climbing over there, and that one is our rope, too, and we have three more people who are going to toprope it, and then we are in line for that one over there, after those 8 people are done with it". It seems to be quite common at a 5.10 crag that there is ONE person in the group that can actually lead that route, if barely, and a whole bunch of people who can flail-toprope it, but not lead it. Therefore, there are a lot of toprope epics, each pitch seems to be taking an hour, large groups or clueless people, lots of overall crankiness, etc.

….

When you go to a 5.12 crag, even if it is quite crowded-- and at the Red 5.12 isn't an elite grade that would guarantee you a no-crowd crag -- everything seems to be moving much smoother.

Again, a difference in where we climb, and probably a difference the local climbing culture: I have never experienced anything that you describe above.


granite_grrl


May 19, 2009, 3:32 PM
Post #63 of 100 (1802 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other? Even at a place like the RRG with tons of quality routes at these grades you'll have to leave the crag you're climbing at and head to another to get a good mix of both.

I am also interested in how your area has such a vastly different climbing culture too. I have had the chance to travel and climb at quite a few big areas withing North America and have not found the culture to be vastly different from area to area.

Please, specify the areas that you keep referring to.


jt512


May 19, 2009, 3:35 PM
Post #64 of 100 (1800 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: [granite_grrl] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

That describes almost every crag in southern California, except for maybe the "quality" component.

Jay


kellie


May 19, 2009, 4:03 PM
Post #65 of 100 (1784 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 15, 2003
Posts: 125

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

From the comments above, I'm guessing that camhead and lena do most of their climbing at single-pitch sport crags in groups, or at least that is the scenario they appear to be describing. While Indian Creek isn't a sport crag, it's kind of a unique situation; nearly all single pitch routes stacked right next to each other; much more like a sport crag than most trad climbing areas.

My only disagreement with what they have stated is that I wouldn't consider someone who can barely get the rope up on a 5.10 sport pitch to be a "5.10 leader," but that's semantics.

It definitely does seem to depend largely on where one climbs -- I'm unfamiliar with most areas east of Devil's Tower; but certainly if you climb 5.10 at Smith, you're letting yourself in for some major clusterfuckage, unless you climb in the lower gorge. However, anyone who climbs 5.10 at the Gunks or Index is unlikely to run into these types of problems.


(This post was edited by kellie on May 19, 2009, 4:05 PM)


elcapinyoazz


May 19, 2009, 4:23 PM
Post #66 of 100 (1768 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2003
Posts: 93

Re: [granite_grrl] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

Off the top of my head, within an hour or so of my house...

Riverside Quarry
New Jack City
Joshua Tree
Suicide


Partner camhead


May 19, 2009, 5:36 PM
Post #67 of 100 (1751 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [elcapinyoazz] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

elcapinyoazz wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

Off the top of my head, within an hour or so of my house...

Riverside Quarry
New Jack City
Joshua Tree
Suicide

fail. Everyone knows that Jtree has NO quality routes of any grade next to each other. heh.

The bottom line of all of this conversation is this: if you climb with people who climb at your grade, you will get more routes in and have a better climbing day. that is all.


lodi5onu


May 19, 2009, 6:30 PM
Post #68 of 100 (1726 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 335

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
elcapinyoazz wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

Off the top of my head, within an hour or so of my house...

Riverside Quarry
New Jack City
Joshua Tree
Suicide

fail. Everyone knows that Jtree has NO quality routes of any grade next to each other. heh.

The bottom line of all of this conversation is this: if you climb with people who climb at your grade, you will get more routes in and have a better climbing day. that is all.

fail. more routes in does not mean a better day. besides, this is coming from a guy that climbs with his wife all the time. Nothing wrong with that, but it means you don't climb as hard as you could otherwise. Women aren't as strong as men. Josune was an anomoly.


clausti


May 19, 2009, 6:54 PM
Post #69 of 100 (1710 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [lodi5onu] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lodi5onu wrote:
camhead wrote:
elcapinyoazz wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

Off the top of my head, within an hour or so of my house...

Riverside Quarry
New Jack City
Joshua Tree
Suicide

fail. Everyone knows that Jtree has NO quality routes of any grade next to each other. heh.

The bottom line of all of this conversation is this: if you climb with people who climb at your grade, you will get more routes in and have a better climbing day. that is all.

fail. more routes in does not mean a better day. besides, this is coming from a guy that climbs with his wife all the time. Nothing wrong with that, but it means you don't climb as hard as you could otherwise. Women aren't as strong as men. Josune was an anomoly.

stupid is as stupid does.


bill413


May 19, 2009, 6:58 PM
Post #70 of 100 (1705 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [lodi5onu] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lodi5onu wrote:
Women aren't as strong as men. Josune was an anomoly.
I don't know - some of those Ukrainian weightlifters are pretty tough.


lodi5onu


May 19, 2009, 7:05 PM
Post #71 of 100 (1701 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 335

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

just sayin


Partner camhead


May 19, 2009, 8:24 PM
Post #72 of 100 (1679 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [lodi5onu] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

lodi5onu wrote:
camhead wrote:
elcapinyoazz wrote:
granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

Off the top of my head, within an hour or so of my house...

Riverside Quarry
New Jack City
Joshua Tree
Suicide

fail. Everyone knows that Jtree has NO quality routes of any grade next to each other. heh.

The bottom line of all of this conversation is this: if you climb with people who climb at your grade, you will get more routes in and have a better climbing day. that is all.

fail. more routes in does not mean a better day. besides, this is coming from a guy that climbs with his wife all the time. Nothing wrong with that, but it means you don't climb as hard as you could otherwise. Women aren't as strong as men. Josune was an anomoly.

gneiss troll, dude!


Partner cracklover


May 19, 2009, 8:44 PM
Post #73 of 100 (1672 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:
camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything.

I would agree with that: anything trad over 5.8/5.9 if it is not a 4 star classic, otherwise over 5.10b or so; for sport (in my experience) over 5.10c should do it.

Yeah, right. Try walking up to any good low to mid 12 at Rumney or Rifle on a nice weekend... and then take a number and wait in line.

In reply to:
Instead of "harder" you could insert "bolder" "more run out" "chossy" "less than 2 stars in the guidebook", especially for trad climbs.

True.

In reply to:
camhead wrote:
I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that.

Could you explain? What drama, headache and compromise are you talking about (especially at a sport crag)? I'm not saying you should not climb with who you want to climb with, but I have a good friend / regular crag partner who climbs 5.13/14, and I belay him on what he wants to climb and he on what I'd like to climb at crags where a 5.10 is right next to (or a few yards down from) the harder climbs he likes. Ditto at trad crags like Donner summit where you have a 5.10 chimney next to (you can stand an belay in the same spot for both) a 5.12d thin finger crack.

camhead wrote:
The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

What do 5.12 and clusterfuck-free have to do with each other? I have alpine partners who climb no harder than 5.8 trad who are lightyears more experienced with ropecraft and moving over rock than some 5.12 gym / crag climbers I know.

I'd say that overall camhead is probably right. But that's just on average, and the exceptions are nearly as common as the "rule". It's equivalent to saying that boys are stronger than girls. True, on average, but not terribly descriptive of individual performance.

The biggest drama queen I've ever climbed with was a 12+/13- sport climber. To his credit, though, the dude knew his shit, and coached me up my first 5.12 redpoint in just three burns.

GO


darkgift06


May 19, 2009, 10:32 PM
Post #74 of 100 (1629 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 16, 2009
Posts: 492

Re: [cracklover] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Im finding that there are 2 types of climbing days for me.

1. Where we have a largish 4-8 person group & mix of climbing levels.
These days tend to be more fun climbing a range of grades & I might get in one climb where I test my skills.

2. 2-3 person group where the skill levels are closer.
These days I find my self pumped right out at the end of the day as we will climb all day testing our skills. not just once or twice.


now, there are days where its husband & wife team those days tend to be a mix & again I might climb one that tests me & she wont even try it, at least shes willing to belay & spend the time, as she knows I just did it for her on that 5.8.


degaine


May 20, 2009, 11:56 AM
Post #75 of 100 (1582 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: [granite_grrl] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

granite_grrl wrote:
degaine, where are these magic crags with quality 5.10s and 5.12/13s next to each other?

No magic to it - I mentioned Donner Summit (CA) in one of my posts. You can add to that example Owen’s River Gorge, Clark's Canyon even the Cookie Cliff (Yosemite), etc. Apparently according to other posts, plenty of areas in SoCal fit the "magic" bill ase well.

Plenty of crags in the Alps (France, Switz., etc.) also fit my description.

granite_grrl wrote:
Even at a place like the RRG with tons of quality routes at these grades you'll have to leave the crag you're climbing at and head to another to get a good mix of both.

Well, I’ve never climbed at RRG, so I can’t feel your pain.

granite_grrl wrote:
I am also interested in how your area has such a vastly different climbing culture too. I have had the chance to travel and climb at quite a few big areas withing North America and have not found the culture to be vastly different from area to area.

Well, you, camhead, lena-chita have stated in so many words that the 5.10 climber creates clusterfucks, and in my experience at every place that I have ever climbed, this is not the case. The 5.10 climber (someone who can really climb 5.10 on lead – trad or sport) in Northern California is certainly not the incompetent boob that according to you three the 5.10 climber in the east appears to be.


clausti


May 20, 2009, 1:16 PM
Post #76 of 100 (1906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:
Well, you, camhead, lena-chita have stated in so many words that the 5.10 climber creates clusterfucks, and in my experience at every place that I have ever climbed, this is not the case.

one 5.10 climber at a time can be manageable- it's the whole crag of "5.10" climbers that congregate where there are 5.10s that is the problem.

In reply to:
The 5.10 climber (someone who can really climb 5.10 on lead – trad or sport) in Northern California is certainly not the incompetent boob that according to you three the 5.10 climber in the east appears to be.

oh please. climbing 5.10 is just not that hard. not so hard that there aren't high school and college kids that can send it (or, more relevant to the discussion of clusterfuckery, bolt to bolt the routes) on their very first trip outside.

my first sport route at 17 was 5.9. my second was a 5.10. i onsited them both at the NRG, where 5.10 *is* a bit less of a gumby grade than at the red. and i was a slooooow leader who'd rather toprope at the time, so i'm sure i contributed to the crowding of the crags. trad climbing, same story. 5.9/5.10 for my first few routes. and while it was cool, because I was with other leaders who were more experienced than me, it would be easy to see how i could have gone off on my own and clusterfucked it up on some 5.10 trad.

the entry fee to a 5.10 crag is not, as you keep trying to suggest, being a solid 5.10 leader. it's being able to get ONE person in your party to the top in some fashion so they can set the route up. this tendency to be in big parties and to toprope makes a 5.10 crag with x number of people and y number of routes more crowded and more frustrating than a 5.12 crag with x people and y routes because routes turn over faster. it's like a parking lot that people park in all day versus one with a 2 hour limit. same size parking lot, same number of cars in it, on average, but which one is easier to get a spot in?

edited to bold what i feel is the most important point.


(This post was edited by clausti on May 20, 2009, 1:19 PM)


degaine


May 20, 2009, 2:15 PM
Post #77 of 100 (1880 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
degaine wrote:
Well, you, camhead, lena-chita have stated in so many words that the 5.10 climber creates clusterfucks, and in my experience at every place that I have ever climbed, this is not the case.

one 5.10 climber at a time can be manageable- it's the whole crag of "5.10" climbers that congregate where there are 5.10s that is the problem.

As one poster mentioned, cliffs like Rifle – where apparently 5.12 is the entry fee – see crowds and lines. Perhaps it is simply lots of climbers congregating in the same place for the same routes that is the problem?

clausti wrote:
In reply to:
The 5.10 climber (someone who can really climb 5.10 on lead – trad or sport) in Northern California is certainly not the incompetent boob that according to you three the 5.10 climber in the east appears to be.

oh please. climbing 5.10 is just not that hard. not so hard that there aren't high school and college kids that can send it (or, more relevant to the discussion of clusterfuckery, bolt to bolt the routes) on their very first trip outside.

I never stated that 5.10 was hard, simply that where I climb or have climbed the 5.10 climber apparently has more experience than where you, camhead, lena-chita and gg climb. In my experience someone who climbs 5.10 trad on a regular basis rarely produces the “clusterfuckery” with regard to ropes, being slow, etc., that has been mentioned.

clausti wrote:
my first sport route at 17 was 5.9. my second was a 5.10. i onsited them both at the NRG, where 5.10 *is* a bit less of a gumby grade than at the red.

Noted. Perhaps you and the others could accept that 5.10 where I climb and have climbed is certainly not a gumby grade?


clausti wrote:
the entry fee to a 5.10 crag is not, as you keep trying to suggest, being a solid 5.10 leader.

I’m only trying to suggest that what camhead, lena-chita, gg and you have experienced cannot be used as a generalization.

clausti wrote:
it's being able to get ONE person in your party to the top in some fashion so they can set the route up. this tendency to be in big parties and to toprope makes a 5.10 crag with x number of people and y number of routes more crowded and more frustrating than a 5.12 crag with x people and y routes because routes turn over faster.

Got it, so it’s groups setting up camp on popular routes at a popular crag that is the problem, and where you climb those routes are primarily in the 5.10 range whereas the 5.12 climbs see little crowds and thus it’s more advantageous (and fun) to be a 5.12 climber.

Not a problem where I climb or have regularly climbed.


justroberto


May 20, 2009, 2:57 PM
Post #78 of 100 (1858 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
[it's the whole crag of "5.10" climbers that congregate where there are 5.10s that is the problem.
This is true.

Rob's List of 5.10 Gumby Clusterfuck Crags:
Summersville Lake
NRG-Junkyard, Bubba City
RRG Sport Crags
Potash Road
Red Rocks
IC?
Anything around Austin.

Crags where you'll never wait in line for a 5.10:
Seneca
Enchanted Rock
NRG - Endless/Beauty
North Carolina (other than Crowder's)
RRG gear routes


In reply to:
oh please. climbing 5.10 is just not that hard.
It is for me, depending on the area. I somehow manage to injure myself any time I venture into 11 territory.

In reply to:
my first sport route at 17 was 5.9. my second was a 5.10. i onsited them both at the NRG, where 5.10 *is* a bit less of a gumby grade than at the red.
Not really applicable. Weren't you a gym rat for a while before you wandered out into the real world?


clausti


May 20, 2009, 4:32 PM
Post #79 of 100 (1825 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [justroberto] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:

In reply to:
my first sport route at 17 was 5.9. my second was a 5.10. i onsited them both at the NRG, where 5.10 *is* a bit less of a gumby grade than at the red.
Not really applicable. Weren't you a gym rat for a while before you wandered out into the real world?

i would actually say my gym-ratism makes it more applicable.

lots and lots of high school and college kids get up some 5.10's on their first trip outside. groups of these people are frequently what clusters up a crag. i just don't believe that every crag in socal magically screens all the college kids out. without some kind of magic filter, you're going to have some gumbies climbing 5.10 at a crag where there are bolted 5.10s.

maybe degain's crags are just generally less crowded. i accept that that would make a huge difference. but no, i don't believe that everybody climbing 5.10 at his crags (especially sport!) are experienced and cluster-free.


clausti


May 20, 2009, 4:36 PM
Post #80 of 100 (1824 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:
Got it, so it’s groups setting up camp on popular routes at a popular crag that is the problem, and where you climb those routes are primarily in the 5.10 range whereas the 5.12 climbs see little crowds and thus it’s more advantageous (and fun) to be a 5.12 climber.

yeah, that's not the case. the .12s at the red probably see 80% or more of the traffic of the 10s in a lot of places. the difference being that people are LEADING the 12's, and are happy to let you work in. as lena said "sure, climb on my draws!" or even "oh hey climb on our rope- so and so wants to top rope it but we're not using it right the second so go ahead."


Partner cracklover


May 20, 2009, 6:12 PM
Post #81 of 100 (1798 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
degaine wrote:
Got it, so it’s groups setting up camp on popular routes at a popular crag that is the problem, and where you climb those routes are primarily in the 5.10 range whereas the 5.12 climbs see little crowds and thus it’s more advantageous (and fun) to be a 5.12 climber.

yeah, that's not the case. the .12s at the red probably see 80% or more of the traffic of the 10s in a lot of places. the difference being that people are LEADING the 12's, and are happy to let you work in. as lena said "sure, climb on my draws!" or even "oh hey climb on our rope- so and so wants to top rope it but we're not using it right the second so go ahead."

Rumney is much the same, with only two notable exceptions that I can think of. If you plan to get on Flesh for Lulu or Social Outcast you should expect that you might have to wait for a crew, including topropers who can barely hang their way up it, to finish.

GO


cchas


May 20, 2009, 8:33 PM
Post #82 of 100 (1773 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 9, 2005
Posts: 344

Re: [cracklover] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Not going to be deragoatory since its been duly noted that there are geographic differences, whereas on 5.10's in the Gunks (where I used to climb) there aren't lines and no worry of cluster$#%&s whereas in Yosemite, Paradise Forks (Az), Indian Creek and areas like that 5.10 is the "easy" climbs so you can still expect cluster$^&%'s.

Is 5.12 important (as the original poster asked)? Only if you think it is. For me, (predominately a trad climber- about 90% of my climbing), the routes in general become more beautiful as they get harder. The purest routes just tend to have the more difficult grades.


degaine


May 21, 2009, 7:01 AM
Post #83 of 100 (1744 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
maybe degain's crags are just generally less crowded. i accept that that would make a huge difference. but no, i don't believe that everybody climbing 5.10 at his crags (especially sport!) are experienced and cluster-free.

I never claimed that these crags are cluster-free, but I did not realize that you were talking in 100% absolutes, that it has to be everybody or nobody.

Sure, I’ve seen my fair share of clusterfucks, mostly watching people daddle on multi-pitch trad climbs in over their head, but where I climb there just aren’t the marauding groups of 5.10 clusterfuckers out to ruin the experience of anyone who climbs less than 5.12 as you seem to claim.


clausti


May 21, 2009, 2:09 PM
Post #84 of 100 (1718 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:
Sure, I’ve seen my fair share of clusterfucks, mostly watching people daddle on multi-pitch trad climbs in over their head, but where I climb there just aren’t the marauding groups of 5.10 clusterfuckers out to ruin the experience of anyone who climbs less than 5.12 as you seem to claim.

you win the award for missing the point.


degaine


May 21, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #85 of 100 (1705 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
degaine wrote:
Sure, I’ve seen my fair share of clusterfucks, mostly watching people daddle on multi-pitch trad climbs in over their head, but where I climb there just aren’t the marauding groups of 5.10 clusterfuckers out to ruin the experience of anyone who climbs less than 5.12 as you seem to claim.

you win the award for missing the point.

I don't see how, but I'm all ears if you're willing to explain.


BenKenobi


May 21, 2009, 2:37 PM
Post #86 of 100 (1697 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 29, 2008
Posts: 20

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I climb at RRG and even on routes 5.10 and under, I've found that pretty much all groups are willing to accommodate others.

If I'm TRing someone on a route and another group walks up, I'll always offer to let them TR it on my rope, let them lead it on my gear, or just get the hell out of their way. If someone else is TRing a route, they almost always offer to let me and my group do the same (TR, lead on their gear, or clean it for us.) It's usually one of the first two that ends up happening.

That has just been my personal experience, and I'm sure there are situations where large groups have hogged routes and been unwilling to accommodate others. I just haven't seen that to be the norm at RRG. One of the best parts about the place is how friendly (almost) everyone is.

Ben


clausti


May 21, 2009, 3:13 PM
Post #87 of 100 (1686 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:
clausti wrote:
degaine wrote:
Sure, I’ve seen my fair share of clusterfucks, mostly watching people daddle on multi-pitch trad climbs in over their head, but where I climb there just aren’t the marauding groups of 5.10 clusterfuckers out to ruin the experience of anyone who climbs less than 5.12 as you seem to claim.

you win the award for missing the point.

I don't see how, but I'm all ears if you're willing to explain.

i've been trying, and you've been deliberately twisting everything i've said.

it's certainly not that there are malicious, marauding groups of people trying to ruin other people's days. mostly it's just that you say people at 5.10 crags are 5.10 climbers, and obtusely refuse to recognize the reality that a lot of people are on 5.10s that are not solid 5.10 leaders.

a lot of people who are on 5.10s are not solid 5.10 climbers. or the group only contains one solid 5.10 climber. the red in particular, but also many other places that are moderately well known, attracts organized and semi-organized groups of people. college outdoors clubs, spring breakers, fall breakers, summer breakers.

and the warm-up crags, and the crags that have multiple climbs in the range of those people tend to be cluster fucks. like i said, there are plenty of college groups that have one guy or one girl that can clip the chains on some 5.10s, barely. or they try and top rope on the draws side of a half-lead route (stopped people from doing this on at least two occasions) they top rope through the anchors, they hang for half an hour when they are people patently waiting, they eat lunch with the rope hanging. or the group that gets there first puts up all 4 or 5 warmups. or they send somebody up to clean the route that doesn't know how to clean. or to tie their knot. all of these things i have seen.

or, as led to someone decking from the anchors of Ro Shambo last fall, they engage in all kinds if chicanery to let multiple people toprope from one lead of a very steep route, and sometimes the systems they use are not well understood by all parties. Ro itself is a .12, but it's at the 5.10iest crag there is, roadside. guess by the name how far the approach is.


and yes, benkenobi, a lot of people are really nice. and the longer they've been climbing, they more they "get it" with route sharing, and the nicer they tend to be. and the vast majority of the time, there are no clusterfucks anywhere, because too many clusterfucks means somebody gets hurt. but where there are, they tend tend to be with groups of 5.10 climbers. i've certainly never had anyone tell me there is 1 more person only to sling 5 more people onto the flail-TR on a 5.12.


BenKenobi


May 21, 2009, 3:24 PM
Post #88 of 100 (1676 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 29, 2008
Posts: 20

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
the red in particular, but also many other places that are moderately well known, attracts organized and semi-organized groups of people. college outdoors clubs, spring breakers, fall breakers, summer breakers.


and yes, benkenobi, a lot of people are really nice. and the longer they've been climbing, they more they "get it" with route sharing, and the nicer they tend to be. and the vast majority of the time, there are no clusterfucks anywhere, because too many clusterfucks means somebody gets hurt. but where there are, they tend tend to be with groups of 5.10 climbers. i've certainly never had anyone tell me there is 1 more person only to sling 5 more people onto the flail-TR on a 5.12.

Ahh, I do agree, and I think the section I bolded hits the nail on the head. I suppose when you're dealing with that type of group, all bets are off. With that said, I'll be heading down this weekend to become part of the horde.....


degaine


May 21, 2009, 3:58 PM
Post #89 of 100 (1660 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 30, 2003
Posts: 491

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Clausti,

Thanks for taking the time to write a response.

clausti wrote:
i've been trying, and you've been deliberately twisting everything i've said.

My apologies, certainly not deliberate. I made my first comments in response to what someone else had initially written.

clausti wrote:
it's certainly not that there are malicious, marauding groups of people trying to ruin other people's days. mostly it's just that you say people at 5.10 crags are 5.10 climbers, and obtusely refuse to recognize the reality that a lot of people are on 5.10s that are not solid 5.10 leaders.

I actually never obtusely refused to recognize that there are people on 5.10s who are not solid 5.10 climbers. In my initial post I responded to this statement :

camhead wrote:
I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that.

I understood 5.10 climbers to be just that, 5.10 climbers, not the category of people who jump on 5.10s but are not solid leading at the grade.

clausti wrote:
a lot of people who are on 5.10s are not solid 5.10 climbers. or the group only contains one solid 5.10 climber. the red in particular, but also many other places that are moderately well known, attracts organized and semi-organized groups of people. college outdoors clubs, spring breakers, fall breakers, summer breakers.

and the warm-up crags, and the crags that have multiple climbs in the range of those people tend to be cluster fucks. like i said, there are plenty of college groups that have one guy or one girl that can clip the chains on some 5.10s, barely. or they try and top rope on the draws side of a half-lead route (stopped people from doing this on at least two occasions) they top rope through the anchors, they hang for half an hour when they are people patently waiting, they eat lunch with the rope hanging. or the group that gets there first puts up all 4 or 5 warmups. or they send somebody up to clean the route that doesn't know how to clean. or to tie their knot. all of these things i have seen.

I totally get that you have experienced all of that in places like the Red and I'm not saying the contrary. Why can’t you just get that where I climb or have climbed (apparently in places that you have not) this is not at all commonplace?


clausti


May 21, 2009, 4:13 PM
Post #90 of 100 (1650 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [degaine] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

degaine wrote:

I actually never obtusely refused to recognize that there are people on 5.10s who are not solid 5.10 climbers. In my initial post I responded to this statement :

camhead wrote:
I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that.

I understood 5.10 climbers to be just that, 5.10 climbers, not the category of people who jump on 5.10s but are not solid leading at the grade.

just fyi, i climb with camhead a lot. and sleep next to him at night. and no matter what your definition of "5.10" climber [which, in that case, camhead was probably using to mean "people who climb routes that are rated 5.10."] a 5.10 climber is going to want to climb some 5.10s. and the routes that are 5.10 are where the drama is.


In reply to:
Why can’t you just get that where I climb or have climbed (apparently in places that you have not) this is not at all commonplace?

fine, you haven't experienced it. that doesn't mean that all the people on the 5.10s at your crag are experienced though. my guess would be is that your crags just aren't crowded enough for you to notice a difference. but we're talking about SPORT climbing, here, which is an important distinction. at a trad crag, the equivalent gumby infested grade would be about 5.8. sure there are a lot of people who've been climbing for a while that are perfectly competent climb 5.10 sport or 5.8 trad, but lots of gumbys are strong enough to get up that shit, too.

but i've climbed at a lot of places. sport and trad in places in every state that could be remotely called the southeast, ny, new hampshire, texas, arizona, nevada, utah, california, wyoming, even idaho. so i will concede that the red is both unusually crowded and unusually gumby-filled. but i won't say that there's not a strong correlation between the grades and gumbyness. stronger people on harder routes are just usually less clusterfucky, the end.


Partner camhead


May 26, 2009, 10:15 PM
Post #91 of 100 (1589 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I just thought I would bump this thread after having a great memorial day weekend at the Gunks. Yeah, you heard me, busiest weekend of the year, at the most crowded crag in the East, probably in the nation.

How does this relate to the topic at hand? Well, first, it has nothing to do with 5.12. There were endless lines on nearly every moderate route. However, everything 5.10a and over was open! We did not wait in line for one single route; we got plenty of climbing in and had a great time.

Once again, it's a reason to climb harder: fewer clusterfucks, better climbing experiences.


blueeyedclimber


May 27, 2009, 12:26 AM
Post #92 of 100 (1545 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I climb 5.10 at the Gunks. I rarely see anyone on these routes (with a few exceptions), let alone anyone clusterf@%*ing them.

What's my point? I don't know, but this whole thread is idiotic. Where I climb, solid 5.10 climbers are not cfing anything.

Josh


Partner camhead


May 27, 2009, 2:33 AM
Post #93 of 100 (1511 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [blueeyedclimber] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
I climb 5.10 at the Gunks. I rarely see anyone on these routes (with a few exceptions), let alone anyone clusterf@%*ing them.

What's my point? I don't know, but this whole thread is idiotic. Where I climb, solid 5.10 climbers are not cfing anything.

Josh

sooo... you're agreeing with me? I think you are.

At the Red, 5.10 climbers are the clusterfucks. At the Gunks, they are not.

Actually, I would be willing to bet that there is a higher proportion of RRG regulars that climb 5.12 sport than Gunks regulars who climb 5.10.

(fires shot across the bow)
Why are you guys so weak out there?


blueeyedclimber


May 27, 2009, 12:29 PM
Post #94 of 100 (1465 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
blueeyedclimber wrote:
I climb 5.10 at the Gunks. I rarely see anyone on these routes (with a few exceptions), let alone anyone clusterf@%*ing them.

What's my point? I don't know, but this whole thread is idiotic. Where I climb, solid 5.10 climbers are not cfing anything.

Josh

sooo... you're agreeing with me? I think you are.

maybe. Tongue

In reply to:
At the Red, 5.10 climbers are the clusterfucks. At the Gunks, they are not.

Actually, I would be willing to bet that there is a higher proportion of RRG regulars that climb 5.12 sport than Gunks regulars who climb 5.10.

(fires shot across the bow)
Why are you guys so weak out there?

I would bet money that 9 out of 10 climbers that climb 5.12 sport could not climb 5.10 at the Gunks. Why you ask? Because they would be spending their whole day in the Uberfall bathroom after soiling themselves. Cool

Josh


bill413


May 27, 2009, 1:44 PM
Post #95 of 100 (1451 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [blueeyedclimber] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
I would bet money that 9 out of 10 climbers that climb 5.12 sport could not climb 5.10 at the Gunks. Why you ask? Because they would be spending their whole day in the Uberfall bathroom after soiling themselves. Cool
Laugh


Partner camhead


May 27, 2009, 1:51 PM
Post #96 of 100 (1447 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [blueeyedclimber] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
In reply to:
At the Red, 5.10 climbers are the clusterfucks. At the Gunks, they are not.

Actually, I would be willing to bet that there is a higher proportion of RRG regulars that climb 5.12 sport than Gunks regulars who climb 5.10.

(fires shot across the bow)
Why are you guys so weak out there?

this is kerrect.



I would bet money that 9 out of 10 climbers that climb 5.12 sport could not climb 5.10 at the Gunks. Why you ask? Because they would be spending their whole day in the Uberfall bathroom after soiling themselves. Cool

Josh


snoopy138


May 27, 2009, 2:19 PM
Post #97 of 100 (1436 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
angry wrote:
camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

Easy for you to say. You're married.

to someone who gives excellent second, no less.

I don't think camhead has yet clipped the anchors of something i couldn't follow.

foreshadowing?


snoopy138


May 27, 2009, 2:36 PM
Post #98 of 100 (1426 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992

Re: [camhead] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
I just thought I would bump this thread after having a great memorial day weekend at the Gunks. Yeah, you heard me, busiest weekend of the year, at the most crowded crag in the East, probably in the nation.

How does this relate to the topic at hand? Well, first, it has nothing to do with 5.12. There were endless lines on nearly every moderate route. However, everything 5.10a and over was open! We did not wait in line for one single route; we got plenty of climbing in and had a great time.

Once again, it's a reason to climb harder: fewer clusterfucks, better climbing experiences.

you guys missed the group of 3 that had one guy lead Transcon, then 5 TR runs between them on that, then a few more TR burns on whatever the harder route is that shares the anchors.


clausti


May 27, 2009, 2:51 PM
Post #99 of 100 (1411 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690

Re: [snoopy138] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

snoopy138 wrote:
clausti wrote:
angry wrote:
camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

Easy for you to say. You're married.

to someone who gives excellent second, no less.

I don't think camhead has yet clipped the anchors of something i couldn't follow.

foreshadowing?

shaddup.


Partner camhead


May 27, 2009, 3:12 PM
Post #100 of 100 (1404 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [clausti] 5.12? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

clausti wrote:
snoopy138 wrote:
clausti wrote:
angry wrote:
camhead wrote:
the harder you climb, the less likely you will have to wait in line for anything. I have moved beyond climbing with and catering to 5.10 climbers, and all the drama, headache, and compromise that accompanies that. The main group I climb with is solid at 5.12, and even when we are fairly large, we are efficient and fairly clusterfuck-free. That's why I like climbing the grade.

That's all I'm going to say.

Easy for you to say. You're married.

to someone who gives excellent second, no less.

I don't think camhead has yet clipped the anchors of something i couldn't follow.

foreshadowing?

shaddup.

zing!


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook