Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Rock and Ice Seneca Article
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 


dreday3000


Dec 30, 2009, 4:53 PM
Post #1 of 76 (3836 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Rock and Ice Seneca Article
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The January 2010 Rock and Ice has a feature article on Seneca Rocks.
Check it out:

http://www.rockandice.com/...=34&type=featart

The article makes the locals out to be a bunch of gumby climbers. While its true there are a lot of Seneca climbers out there that aren't exactly pushing it, I think there are plenty of hard climbers at Seneca.

I for one climb at Seneca and don't consider myself a gumby. How bout you guys? Anyone else a little peeved?


zxcv


Dec 30, 2009, 8:38 PM
Post #2 of 76 (3757 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2006
Posts: 96

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

What's a gumby? I always thought a "noobie" was a new and potentially dangerous leader, so is a gumby a safe but mid-level leader?
If so, I'm fine being a gumby.

The article suggests that the majority of "local" climbers from DC and Pittsburgh keep it below 5.10. Every time I have been down there, that appeared to be the case (as it is in the Gunks).

However, the author does come off as slightly patronizing in his assessment of Seneca climbers, but that does not mean his observation of the average lead-level of the areas visitors is inaccurate.


wanderlustmd


Dec 30, 2009, 8:48 PM
Post #3 of 76 (3751 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Well, to a certain degree it's true. I climbed at Seneca a ton over two years of living in the DC area and I never saw anyone on Madmen Only or Malevolence...or Ambush...or the entire cave area. The place does get a lot of traffic from more moderate climbers and, yes, a ton of gumbies. Nothing wrong with that.

However, the idea that no one climbs Castor, Pollux, Orangeaid, Nip and Tuck, etc. is wrong. I've seen plenty of people on those climbs. The whole, "we were being watched closely by locals because we were on 5.10s" bit was kind of lame. The article published back in '98 was better. But this article had some great history and did a pretty good overview of the crag.

I'd love to get a copy of that '98 back issue, though...


marc801


Dec 30, 2009, 9:05 PM
Post #4 of 76 (3735 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [zxcv] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zxcv wrote:
What's a gumby? I always thought a "noobie" was a new and potentially dangerous leader, so is a gumby a safe but mid-level leader?
Gumby = soft, bendy, occasionally green complextioned, climber.


dreday3000


Dec 30, 2009, 9:08 PM
Post #5 of 76 (3733 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [wanderlustmd] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

First and foremost lets get one thing straight. The Cave is not exactly Seneca's finest asset. The Threat is a great route but everything else in there is sub par. Climbing in the Cave at Seneca is like going to Yosemite to boulder - a fun diversion, but not exactly the main event.

As for not seeing other people on the North West Face (home to Madmen and Malevolence etc) I've seen plenty of people there. The area is less crowded to be sure but its a small area and quite frankly Madmen and Malevolence are the easiest ticks on the cliff.

I think part of the issue is that Seneca climbers are a diverse group of people that come from many different cities who generally keep to themselves. Of the 10 or so climbers I know that reguralry go to Seneca I would say 7 of them are climbing 10s and up.

In my experience its pretty rare to hear Seneca climbers spraying about what they climbed and how hard they are. In contrast, areas like Salt Lake and Boulder have a high concentration of climbers congregating in one spot so its easier to spray about your latest tick. At Seneca people come, climb, and then go there separate ways.

Whatever its faults, I like Seneca the way it is. I Just posted cause I was curious to know if other people had the same experience as the author.


dreday3000


Dec 30, 2009, 9:10 PM
Post #6 of 76 (3730 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [zxcv] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zxcv wrote:
What's a gumby?

Gumby = Noob. Think it might be an Australian term.


vinniemazz


Dec 30, 2009, 9:26 PM
Post #7 of 76 (3713 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 9, 2006
Posts: 6

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

Amen to wanderlustmd's comments. One of my favorite things about climbing at Seneca is that people don't spray... you can get plenty of that in the New if you want it. Seneca is purely about climbing and socializing over pizza, beer, and a camp fire. The same guy climbing Crack of Dawn or Muscle Beach is high fiving someone for their first lead on Ecstacy and commenting on how classic Soler is. That is just the way it is... and thats what is beautiful about Seneca.


wanderlustmd


Dec 30, 2009, 9:37 PM
Post #8 of 76 (3707 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
In my experience its pretty rare to hear Seneca climbers spraying about what they climbed and how hard they are. In contrast, areas like Salt Lake and Boulder have a high concentration of climbers congregating in one spot so its easier to spray about your latest tick. At Seneca people come, climb, and then go there separate ways.

For sure, which is what I love about the place. It has a pretty welcoming atmosphere.


Partner camhead


Dec 30, 2009, 10:05 PM
Post #9 of 76 (3691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [wanderlustmd] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.


wanderlustmd


Dec 30, 2009, 10:09 PM
Post #10 of 76 (3684 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.
You should, there are lots of great routes to be climbed.
Things can be a bit loose; several of the single pitch classics have a "rarely done second pitch" that someone ventures onto every once in a while....


IsayAutumn


Dec 30, 2009, 10:14 PM
Post #11 of 76 (3675 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 8, 2008
Posts: 355

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.

I heard it was because you were scared.


Partner camhead


Dec 30, 2009, 10:20 PM
Post #12 of 76 (3669 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [IsayAutumn] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

IsayAutumn wrote:
camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.

I heard it was because you were scared.

Yes, fat traddies yarding on choss does scare the hell out of me.


IsayAutumn


Dec 30, 2009, 10:22 PM
Post #13 of 76 (3666 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 8, 2008
Posts: 355

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
IsayAutumn wrote:
camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.

I heard it was because you were scared.

Yes, fat traddies yarding on choss does scare the hell out of me.

Then please stay away.


cclarke


Dec 31, 2009, 1:55 AM
Post #14 of 76 (3615 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 160

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's an article written by someone who hasn't spent much time at Seneca so it's hardly surprising that it's superficial and somewhat misleading. It's also Rock and Ice so what do you expect?

Edit:

It's not really a bad article but it's kind of silly to think anyone will notice or care if you climb 5.10-5.11 there. Nice to see Hunt and Ray get some play.


(This post was edited by cclarke on Dec 31, 2009, 2:37 AM)


rock_ranger


Dec 31, 2009, 2:04 AM
Post #15 of 76 (3610 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: 189

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Anyone else think it was weird that they didn't mention Tom C. either?


Partner climboard


Dec 31, 2009, 2:50 AM
Post #16 of 76 (3580 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I thought it was a decent article, but that part stood out to me as well. The idea that all the locals were staring at them in awe for climbing 5.10 sounds a bit overdramatic.

Madmen and Malevolence don't see much traffic since they are a bit isolated but I can't recall the last time I've spent a day at Seneca when people weren't climbing the classic 10s on the East face.


lofstromc


Dec 31, 2009, 4:06 AM
Post #17 of 76 (3550 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 528

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

For your first time. Make sure you go on a weekday. The area can get over-run with too many people and then it may suck. Last time I was there I climbed Bring on the Nubiles. That is a nice climb.


mheyman


Dec 31, 2009, 7:59 AM
Post #18 of 76 (3506 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2002
Posts: 607

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
Whatever is said about the people there the horedes that are sometimes there aren't all locals,

More importantly the area isn't a place I consider dangerous place because of rockfall.


villageidiot


Dec 31, 2009, 2:45 PM
Post #19 of 76 (3473 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 12, 2005
Posts: 104

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I suspect the the Explorers Clubs of Pittsburgh, and the various college groups such as the Pitt Outdoors Club and Penn State Outing club are largely responsible for creating a gumbyland atmosphere. Its sort of inevitable when the 5.9 leading "bad @sses" in your group are escorting large groups that only learned to belay last week. Unfortunaly, falling rock, falling gear, and parties taking all day to climb a 200ft 3 pitch route seem to be unavoidable. Debating whether people were staring at 5.10 climbers only exasperates the point in a world were nobody cares if one climbs 5.12.


zealotnoob


Dec 31, 2009, 3:18 PM
Post #20 of 76 (3453 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 2, 2006
Posts: 525

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I had the same reaction, as did many from the PATC group. I wrote this on the author's blog.

"While I love the press on my and our favorite place, I take exception to the idea that none of the regulars do the 5.10s and harder. The author made it sound like we're all a bunch of bumbling noobs while it took a west coast climber to grace WV and experience the potential of Seneca. There are many of us who climb hard at Seneca."

Here's the link to the blog:
http://pullphotography.blogspot.com/...ca-rock-ice-183.html


(This post was edited by zealotnoob on Dec 31, 2009, 3:26 PM)


olderic


Dec 31, 2009, 3:29 PM
Post #21 of 76 (3447 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
IsayAutumn wrote:
camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.

I heard it was because you were scared.

Yes, fat traddies yarding on choss does scare the hell out of me.

Absolutely. Definitely better for you to stay in grade inflated e-climbing land where you and yours can spray to your heart's content - you know - stick to what you are good at.


Partner camhead


Dec 31, 2009, 4:00 PM
Post #22 of 76 (3422 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [olderic] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

olderic wrote:
camhead wrote:
IsayAutumn wrote:
camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.

I heard it was because you were scared.

Yes, fat traddies yarding on choss does scare the hell out of me.

Absolutely. Definitely better for you to stay in grade inflated e-climbing land where you and yours can spray to your heart's content - you know - stick to what you are good at.

Damn. I guess I'll have to make a trip out to Seneca just to piss you guys off. Smile

FWIW, I also really resent the fact that magazines tend to "import" "hard" climbers, usually from Colorado, to local areas, and shortchange the locals who have put so much work into their areas. It happens a lot. The fact that many hard Southern climbers are pretty low key (even secretive) about their accomplishments only furthers myths like this in the national climbing media.


hansundfritz


Dec 31, 2009, 5:26 PM
Post #23 of 76 (3384 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 139

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I had a similar reaction about the criticism of the "locals" (who live in DC and PGH). It did give credit to Seneca for its hard grades and singled out Gunsight to South Peak as a truly fantastic climb at 5.4. I was disappointed that they mostly ignored some of the moderate classics (Green Wall). They could have connected with average joe climbers better that way.

Too much attention to the Gendarme. Visitors can't climb it. Old timers learned nothing new. Ho-hum. Almost a waste of ink.

And why climb on the Southern Pillar? Hardly the scene of Seneca's best stuff. Why not venture onto the Bell Wall? Talk about a steep and scary place where very few venture.

I also thought that the photography was pretty lame for such a photogenic place. And am I correct that they used a fish-eye lens to shoot Madmen, making it look steeper than it really is?


cchas


Dec 31, 2009, 5:57 PM
Post #24 of 76 (3372 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 9, 2005
Posts: 344

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

why do you care if someone calls you a gumby or not (or for anything else for that matter). Just go out and pull down and see what YOUR limit is.

After 35+ yrs of climbing I profess proudly to be a gumbie since there are tons of people who climb harder then I do. I still am exploring my limit, I know my faults and what I need to work on, but enjoy every minute of what I do, ireegardless of what someone calls me.


(This post was edited by cchas on Dec 31, 2009, 5:58 PM)


dreday3000


Dec 31, 2009, 6:34 PM
Post #25 of 76 (3354 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [cchas] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cchas wrote:
why do you care if someone calls you a gumby or not (or for anything else for that matter). Just go out and pull down and see what YOUR limit is.
.

I'm not bothered by a personal attack, but the article wasn't about my specific climbing abilities. It was about Seneca. From what I've seen at Seneca, I think the author missed a wide swath of climbers who are doing plenty of tough climbs. That's all I'm saying.


dreday3000


Dec 31, 2009, 6:37 PM
Post #26 of 76 (1963 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [hansundfritz] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hansundfritz wrote:

I also thought that the photography was pretty lame for such a photogenic place. And am I correct that they used a fish-eye lens to shoot Madmen, making it look steeper than it really is?

Actually I thought the photography was pretty good. Certainly not the best shots I've Seneca I've seen, but they were pretty good on the whole.

And Madmen is fairly steep. Not cave steep, but steep enough.


hansundfritz


Dec 31, 2009, 6:41 PM
Post #27 of 76 (1961 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2008
Posts: 139

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The photos were okay, I guess. But like I said, it's so photogenic and so easy, really, to photograph. The pictures didn't capture the real magic of the place, in my opinion.


indy_md


Dec 31, 2009, 6:55 PM
Post #28 of 76 (1951 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2005
Posts: 27

Re: [camhead] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

camhead wrote:
olderic wrote:
camhead wrote:
IsayAutumn wrote:
camhead wrote:
Heh. I still have not checked out Seneca since I moved east, and part of the reason I have not yet is because I have gotten the impression that it is a gumby-fest riddled with falling rocks and idiots.

I haven't looked at the article yet.

I heard it was because you were scared.

Yes, fat traddies yarding on choss does scare the hell out of me.

Absolutely. Definitely better for you to stay in grade inflated e-climbing land where you and yours can spray to your heart's content - you know - stick to what you are good at.

Damn. I guess I'll have to make a trip out to Seneca just to piss you guys off. Smile
Nah. Go a couple hours north and climb at The Narrows near Cumberland. No lines, no traffic, no waiting, and still some loose rock needing to be trundled. Wink


indy_md


Dec 31, 2009, 6:58 PM
Post #29 of 76 (1951 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 7, 2005
Posts: 27

Re: [hansundfritz] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hansundfritz wrote:
I had a similar reaction about the criticism of the "locals" (who live in DC and PGH). It did give credit to Seneca for its hard grades and singled out Gunsight to South Peak as a truly fantastic climb at 5.4.

5.4?? When did that become a 5.4? Hasn't it always been 5.2? (well, okay, 5.3 Wink ). Damn grade inflation.


stan


Dec 31, 2009, 9:59 PM
Post #30 of 76 (1922 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 26, 2003
Posts: 13

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well, well, well....I guess that I have an advantage in that I have climbed at Seneca for 30 years.
Also the Gunks for 53 years. To say Seneca has a lot of Gumbies is accurate, but the reason that not many venture on to the hard stuff is that it is hard and steep. Let's see you hot shots get on some of the Eddie Begoon climbs! As for the cave....it's a good place to get out of the rain. Seneca, and West Va. always seems like home for me with none of the spray and BS that I have found at other crags.


rockandlice


Dec 31, 2009, 11:51 PM
Post #31 of 76 (1903 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2008
Posts: 622

Re: [wanderlustmd] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wanderlustmd wrote:

However, the idea that no one climbs Castor, Pollux, Orangeaid, Nip and Tuck, etc. is wrong. I've seen plenty of people on those climbs. The whole, "we were being watched closely by locals because we were on 5.10s" bit was kind of lame. The article published back in '98 was better.

My thoughts as well. I 'bout puked in my mouth when I read the 'being watched closely' and "The next morning word was out & everyone wanted to ask us about the 5.10s." comments.

Yeah buddy, your ascents were the talk of the town. Crazy

There is a reason people like this asshat aren't regulars at Seneca.


dreday3000


Jan 1, 2010, 4:55 PM
Post #32 of 76 (1869 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [stan] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

stan wrote:
Let's see you hot shots get on some of the Eddie Begoon climbs! .
Begoon routes are great. That guy could crimp! Routes by by Begoon, Prothro, Swoager, and Shull always stand out.


hyhuu


Jan 4, 2010, 4:29 PM
Post #33 of 76 (1796 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
stan wrote:
Let's see you hot shots get on some of the Eddie Begoon climbs! .
Begoon routes are great. That guy could crimp! Routes by by Begoon, Prothro, Swoager, and Shull always stand out.

Back then when I was breaking into leading 5.10s at Seneca, one day I managed to struggle and huff my way up Mongoose. A few days latter while chatting with Tony Barnes, I mentioned to him that I felt Mongoose was really hard for a 5.10a comparing to other 5.10a. He bursted out laughing and said "Do you know who put up that route? It's Eddie Begoon. He doesn't know what a 5.10a is".


Partner j_ung


Jan 6, 2010, 2:03 AM
Post #34 of 76 (1732 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [zxcv] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

zxcv wrote:
What's a gumby? I always thought a "noobie" was a new and potentially dangerous leader, so is a gumby a safe but mid-level leader?
If so, I'm fine being a gumby.

Confused about the definition of "gumby?" Let's go a little old-school RC.com...

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...iew_flat;post=627369

Edit: Cue flashback music!


(This post was edited by j_ung on Jan 6, 2010, 2:04 AM)


cclarke


Jan 6, 2010, 4:04 PM
Post #35 of 76 (1691 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 160

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"hyhuu wrote:

Back then when I was breaking into leading 5.10s at Seneca, one day I managed to struggle and huff my way up Mongoose. A few days latter while chatting with Tony Barnes, I mentioned to him that I felt Mongoose was really hard for a 5.10a comparing to other 5.10a. He bursted out laughing and said "Do you know who put up that route? It's Eddie Begoon. He doesn't know what a 5.10a is".


For about a decade after most of the old 5.9s were upgraded, I thought Mongoose was the biggest sandbag left at Seneca. I think it is now called 10d which is probably about right.


guangzhou


Jan 7, 2010, 1:32 AM
Post #36 of 76 (1653 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389

Re: [cclarke] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I just read the article. I had already seen this thread when I read it and what stuck me was that the writer never really ventured beyond the 5.9 to low end 5.10 range either.

I've climbed all over the U.S. and I can honestly say, in most trad climbing areas, if you climb 5.10 or 5.11, you rarely have to stand in line. It's not a grade most people reach when climbing trad.

My two cents


Partner camhead


Jan 7, 2010, 2:01 AM
Post #37 of 76 (1647 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939

Re: [guangzhou] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

guangzhou wrote:

I've climbed all over the U.S. and I can honestly say, in most trad climbing areas, if you climb 5.10 or 5.11, you rarely have to stand in line. It's not a grade most people reach when climbing trad.

My two cents

True. And, another reason that Indian Creek is not a "trad area."


andersjr


Jan 7, 2010, 8:52 PM
Post #38 of 76 (1596 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 1, 2005
Posts: 141

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have made a few trips to Seneca (very limited experience). I have done Castor, Polluk and Crack of Fear. It is such a unique rock to anything I have ever seen. I am afraid to push my limits because of the rocks sharpness as well as how polished it is (still haven't weighted gear there yet. . .). One bad move and you could be going for a long ride. It is a place that tests your mental as well as your physical. I can't wait for the season to start again.

This guys article is a joke. He thought he was the talk of the camp, but he was probably just the douche of the camp.


miklaw


Jan 12, 2010, 1:40 AM
Post #39 of 76 (1534 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2004
Posts: 99

Re: [andersjr] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

I thought the Seneca article was a bit light. I don’t think the article really conveyed what a sandbag of a place Seneca is, I’d say it’s undergraded a full number grade in many cases. I’ve backed off 10b’s there and onsighted 12b’s the next day at The New. The area ethos isn’t “what’s the highest we can grade this?” but “What is the lowest grade we can put on this without bursting out laughing”.

Part of the weird grading there is just history, many routes were full of pitons when they went free. Forty years later the pitons have mostly fallen out and some climbs can be a lot harder to protect, and do. The dudes probably attracted attention because they weren’t locals, not because they were doing a bunch of the better protected 5.10s. BTW I think Ambush is really at The New if you know what I mean; easy and well protected). If they’d done routes left of Madmen Only they might have attracted some attention.

Yes, you'd get many 10 and 11 leaders at The New, for example, but if they came to Seneca, they'd be on the 8's and having a great time. Different styles of climbing.

In fairness if I had to write an article about somewhere I didn’t know and climbed a bunch of easy classics, I wouldn’t do a great job either. I think R&I prefers to use journos (who can write and spell) rather than locals (who know the area). Pity.


(This post was edited by miklaw on Jan 13, 2010, 1:57 AM)


Partner j_ung


Jan 14, 2010, 1:40 PM
Post #40 of 76 (1489 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [miklaw] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

miklaw wrote:
Yes, you'd get many 10 and 11 leaders at The New, for example, but if they came to Seneca, they'd be on the 8's and having a great time. Different styles of climbing.

Guilty as charged. Cool


stredna


Jan 14, 2010, 4:49 PM
Post #41 of 76 (1458 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 7, 2006
Posts: 12

Re: [cclarke] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cclarke wrote:
It's an article written by someone who hasn't spent much time at Seneca so it's hardly surprising that it's superficial and somewhat misleading. It's also Rock and Ice so what do you expect?

Edit:

It's not really a bad article but it's kind of silly to think anyone will notice or care if you climb 5.10-5.11 there. Nice to see Hunt and Ray get some play.

The writing is trash. Rock & Ice should look for authors who dont bash "gumbies" or colloquially known as people having fun in the moment. I'm glad the author lives west of the mississippi, cause he would be to big for his britches on this side.


hyhuu


Jan 14, 2010, 5:24 PM
Post #42 of 76 (1440 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If the author had left out a few of those "self-important" sentences, it would have been a fairly decent article. It's too bad because those lines don't any values to the article and more of a distraction. One surprise thing was they didn't do any climbs at the "Face of a thousand pitons" but instead spending time at the Southern Pillar and lower slab. BTW, Ambush could prob qualify as a high ball boulder problem elsewhere.


dreday3000


Jan 14, 2010, 6:32 PM
Post #43 of 76 (1426 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Has anyone ever done Ambush?

I've never even seen it but the photos make it look pretty cool.....its not that thing that comes out to the left of the cave is it? The start to muscle beach?


scrapedape


Jan 14, 2010, 6:59 PM
Post #44 of 76 (1415 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 2392

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hyhuu wrote:
One surprise thing was they didn't do any climbs at the "Face of a thousand pitons" but instead spending time at the Southern Pillar and lower slab.

Agreed. The "awed locals" were probably more curious over where they had chosen to climb than what they had chosen to climb.

There are certainly plenty of parts of Seneca that see relatively little traffic, e.g. the North Peak, especially on its West Face. I suspect this is as much due to the additional approach as to climbing difficulty. I've rarely been to Seneca and not seen folks on the likes of Castor and Pollux.

Never seen anyone on p2 of Totem, however.


hyhuu


Jan 14, 2010, 7:20 PM
Post #45 of 76 (1408 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
Has anyone ever done Ambush?

I've never even seen it but the photos make it look pretty cool.....its not that thing that comes out to the left of the cave is it? The start to muscle beach?

I've done it a couple times. The climb is on the Southern Pillar (not the South End) and just to the left of Blocky Party. It's very short and needs no more than 3 pieces of gears.


cclarke


Jan 14, 2010, 7:49 PM
Post #46 of 76 (1395 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 160

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
Has anyone ever done Ambush?

Ambush is ok. If you go over there, you could check out Daytripper Direct which is a very nice and fairly challenging 5.11. Daytripper itself is often a little damp and not that exciting but the direct continuation of the regular route is worthy.


dreday3000


Jan 14, 2010, 11:12 PM
Post #47 of 76 (1376 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [cclarke] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cclarke wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
Has anyone ever done Ambush?

Ambush is ok. If you go over there, you could check out Daytripper Direct which is a very nice and fairly challenging 5.11. Daytripper itself is often a little damp and not that exciting but the direct continuation of the regular route is worthy.

Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?


cclarke


Jan 15, 2010, 5:02 AM
Post #48 of 76 (1343 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 160

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?

In the same area, you can do Judgment Seat which is one of the better 5.10s at Seneca and, from the Judgment Seat itself at the end of the first pitch, exit the alcove to the right and follow a sweet stemming/edging corner past some fixed pro and nuts/cams at moderate 5.11. It's not in the guidebook but it is good.

For you, I would also recommend the Samurai Wall. Really great thin quartzite face/crack routes. Each route is real 5.12. It's on the West Face below Front C. Easy to check out on toprope first.


wallmonkey35


Jan 15, 2010, 7:19 AM
Post #49 of 76 (1329 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 28, 2005
Posts: 102

Re: [stredna] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

For me, this article was a slap in the face to many Seneca climbers. Besides all of the obvious points that were already mentioned (author did not climb enough routes, too much ego-boosting, odd route selections to write about) a few other things really struck me.

First off, Ambush, while being rated 5.11 is by far the easiest and least committing 5.11 at Seneca. While it is still a great, fun, and challenging route, it is a one move wonder and only needs 3 pieces of gear to protect the entire route! If you really want to get a taste of a true Seneca .11 go and hop on terraferma homesick blues. Now that's a route!

Also, of course a majority of the classic 5.10s routes would be crowd-free when you went to climb them. It was MIDWEEK. Has anyone every been to Seneca midweek? NO routes have a line for them, not just the 5.10s.

Last, it just so happened that the during the same time the author was at Seneca, a "local" climber actually came and flashed a .12, The Bell. A VERY impressive feat. Why wasn't this gentleman the "talk of the town" that week? I know, because unlike the author, this person (as most Seneca climbers would) did not feel the need to spew about his latest send. Having a sizable ego does not make up for a lacking in size somewhere else.


johnwesely


Jan 15, 2010, 1:28 PM
Post #50 of 76 (1304 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

For what it is worth, my climbing partner said the article made him really want to go to Seneca. I have not read it.


gmggg


Jan 15, 2010, 2:40 PM
Post #51 of 76 (1340 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [Whiners] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.


johnwesely


Jan 15, 2010, 3:15 PM
Post #52 of 76 (1329 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [gmggg] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.


hyhuu


Jan 15, 2010, 3:20 PM
Post #53 of 76 (1327 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?

That's because there are only a handful of good 11 there. If you haven't done so, check out The Socerer. It goes up the Pleasant Overhang roof on the right side. The climbing is quite good but doesn't see much traffic so it can be licheny. Another one is Kosher Critter (direct?) on the far right side of the critter wall. It's only 10d but very nice climbing. Combining both sections and it's a nice long pitch. Ambush is ok to play on only when it gets too hot to climb everywhere else.


gmggg


Jan 15, 2010, 3:29 PM
Post #54 of 76 (1319 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [johnwesely] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.

You could write the same exact article about Joshua Tree for gods sakes. Let it go.


dreday3000


Jan 15, 2010, 3:37 PM
Post #55 of 76 (1312 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [cclarke] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cclarke wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?

In the same area, you can do Judgment Seat which is one of the better 5.10s at Seneca and, from the Judgment Seat itself at the end of the first pitch, exit the alcove to the right and follow a sweet stemming/edging corner past some fixed pro and nuts/cams at moderate 5.11. It's not in the guidebook but it is good.


Good to know, I'll check that out.

In reply to:
For you, I would also recommend the Samurai Wall. Really great thin quartzite face/crack routes. Each route is real 5.12. It's on the West Face below Front C. Easy to check out on toprope first.

Sounds real good!

After a quick scan through the database, I'm still a little confused as to what you mean by "below Front C". Where is this? Can you give me a name of a route in the area?
Thanks for the beta.


johnwesely


Jan 15, 2010, 3:38 PM
Post #56 of 76 (1311 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [gmggg] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.

You could write the same exact article about Joshua Tree for gods sakes. Let it go.

No I will never let it go. We are climbers that only care about having fun on the rock. We could care less about grades, but don't dare say we don't climb hard routes!


dreday3000


Jan 15, 2010, 3:41 PM
Post #57 of 76 (1309 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hyhuu wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?

That's because there are only a handful of good 11 there. If you haven't done so, check out The Socerer. It goes up the Pleasant Overhang roof on the right side. The climbing is quite good but doesn't see much traffic so it can be licheny. Another one is Kosher Critter (direct?) on the far right side of the critter wall. It's only 10d but very nice climbing. Combining both sections and it's a nice long pitch. Ambush is ok to play on only when it gets too hot to climb everywhere else.

So that's what those bolts out of overhand are! Cool, I'll check that out too.

Sounds like I'm gonna have a good day out next time I'm in Seneca.


gmggg


Jan 15, 2010, 3:46 PM
Post #58 of 76 (1303 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [johnwesely] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.

You could write the same exact article about Joshua Tree for gods sakes. Let it go.

No I will never let it go. We are climbers that only care about having fun on the rock. We could care less about grades, but don't dare say we don't climb hard routes!

You don't climb hard routes.


johnwesely


Jan 15, 2010, 4:01 PM
Post #59 of 76 (1292 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360

Re: [gmggg] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.

You could write the same exact article about Joshua Tree for gods sakes. Let it go.

No I will never let it go. We are climbers that only care about having fun on the rock. We could care less about grades, but don't dare say we don't climb hard routes!

You don't climb hard routes.

You don't climb hard routes!


hyhuu


Jan 15, 2010, 4:49 PM
Post #60 of 76 (1279 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
hyhuu wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?

That's because there are only a handful of good 11 there. If you haven't done so, check out The Socerer. It goes up the Pleasant Overhang roof on the right side. The climbing is quite good but doesn't see much traffic so it can be licheny. Another one is Kosher Critter (direct?) on the far right side of the critter wall. It's only 10d but very nice climbing. Combining both sections and it's a nice long pitch. Ambush is ok to play on only when it gets too hot to climb everywhere else.

So that's what those bolts out of overhand are! Cool, I'll check that out too.

Sounds like I'm gonna have a good day out next time I'm in Seneca.

Yes, both Socerer and Kosher Critter are mixed route. About the samurai wall, I think Clark is referring to the wall just to the right of Front C, which is right below the Le Gourmet ledge. Just remember to warm up our tendons first and bring small gears.


dreday3000


Jan 15, 2010, 5:01 PM
Post #61 of 76 (1273 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hyhuu wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
hyhuu wrote:
[quote , I think Clark is referring to the wall just to the right of Front C, which is right below the Le Gourmet ledge. Just remember to warm up our tendons first and bring small gears.

Oh ok, I know that wall. It's got Sidewinder (great route!) and Blackmamba and Viper right?

I've heard that blackmamba is good but HARD. Lots of hold that look like upside down lightswitchs.


hyhuu


Jan 15, 2010, 5:29 PM
Post #62 of 76 (1262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
hyhuu wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
hyhuu wrote:
[quote , I think Clark is referring to the wall just to the right of Front C, which is right below the Le Gourmet ledge. Just remember to warm up our tendons first and bring small gears.

Oh ok, I know that wall. It's got Sidewinder (great route!) and Blackmamba and Viper right?

I've heard that blackmamba is good but HARD. Lots of hold that look like upside down lightswitchs.

Not that one. It's a little bit further to the left. If you stand just a little bit left of Le Gourmet, looking up you should see a seemingly a blank white wall above. Perhaps clarke can correct me if I'm wrong.


gmggg


Jan 15, 2010, 5:29 PM
Post #63 of 76 (1262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 25, 2009
Posts: 2099

Re: [johnwesely] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.

You could write the same exact article about Joshua Tree for gods sakes. Let it go.

No I will never let it go. We are climbers that only care about having fun on the rock. We could care less about grades, but don't dare say we don't climb hard routes!

You don't climb hard routes.

You don't climb hard routes!

Now if only Rock and Ice mentioned this I would really have something to get upset about!

Oh...and Kerekt.Frown


hyhuu


Jan 15, 2010, 5:31 PM
Post #64 of 76 (1262 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [johnwesely] Rock and Ice Hurt My Feelings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
johnwesely wrote:
gmggg wrote:
While I can see that the article is a bit silly/inflammatory all you butthurtz whiners are just making it worse.

We really don't care about grades. We climb for ourselves, and nobody else. We could care less what anyone thinks, but don't ever say we only climb easy routes.

You could write the same exact article about Joshua Tree for gods sakes. Let it go.

No I will never let it go. We are climbers that only care about having fun on the rock. We could care less about grades, but don't dare say we don't climb hard routes!

You don't climb hard routes.

You don't climb hard routes!

I agree that it should be let go. Beside, climbing 10s and 11s don't qualify as climbing hard either (they are hard for me) so if everyone lines up to do those, the point is still moot.


Partner climboard


Jan 15, 2010, 11:19 PM
Post #65 of 76 (1228 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 10, 2001
Posts: 503

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I would assume cclarke is referring to Projected Futures, Ronin, and Hishiryo if you want to check the guidebook. They look thin, scary, and beautiful!

Autumn Fire and the Changeling are nice if you haven't been on them. Helter Skelter is also worth getting on. It is 10c in the guidebook but felt like an 11 to me.


stevecurtis


Jan 16, 2010, 12:09 AM
Post #66 of 76 (1219 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 9, 2007
Posts: 41

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I read the rock and ice article, and never noticed an implied "diss" of Seneca.
I'm a westerner who has spent 5 years in DC. While I prefer Old Rag, Seneca has its charm. However, as a continuous climber of 31 years, I consider Seneca more dangerous than most other areas, including Whitesides.
In the 90s during a previous life, every trip to Seneca seemed to include anonymous screams and cries, with a helicopter arriving afterward.


dreday3000


Jan 16, 2010, 12:16 AM
Post #67 of 76 (1218 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [climboard] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climboard wrote:
I would assume cclarke is referring to Projected Futures, Ronin, and Hishiryo if you want to check the guidebook. They look thin, scary, and beautiful!

Autumn Fire and the Changeling are nice if you haven't been on them. Helter Skelter is also worth getting on. It is 10c in the guidebook but felt like an 11 to me.

Damn Projected, Ronin and Hishiryo look serious.

I've done Changeling. Really good. I''ll try the others


wanderlustmd


Jan 16, 2010, 12:50 AM
Post #68 of 76 (1203 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [cclarke] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cclarke wrote:
dreday3000 wrote:
Good to know, I don't get over to the Southern Pillar much. I only know a handful of good 11s at Seneca so its always nice to find something else to check out. You recommend anything else?

In the same area, you can do Judgment Seat which is one of the better 5.10s at Seneca and, from the Judgment Seat itself at the end of the first pitch, exit the alcove to the right and follow a sweet stemming/edging corner past some fixed pro and nuts/cams at moderate 5.11. It's not in the guidebook but it is good.

For you, I would also recommend the Samurai Wall. Really great thin quartzite face/crack routes. Each route is real 5.12. It's on the West Face below Front C. Easy to check out on toprope first.
Thanks for the info on that .11, I'm headed back to Seneca in the spring and will have to check it out.


wanderlustmd


Jan 16, 2010, 12:57 AM
Post #69 of 76 (1188 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150

Re: [climboard] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

climboard wrote:
I would assume cclarke is referring to Projected Futures, Ronin, and Hishiryo if you want to check the guidebook. They look thin, scary, and beautiful!

Autumn Fire and the Changeling are nice if you haven't been on them. Helter Skelter is also worth getting on. It is 10c in the guidebook but felt like an 11 to me.
Helter Skelter is a good one for sure, definately check it out. I remember it feeling stiff for .10c


euphoricclimbing


Jan 16, 2010, 1:18 AM
Post #70 of 76 (1177 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 20, 2002
Posts: 56

Re: [wanderlustmd] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Man, I'll put in my two cents. The article was average at best. The article did seem to portray locals and regulars as obsolete. The overall tone just didn't give any love to the people that climb at Seneca. Some weeks just don't get a ton of traffic. This is a beautiful thing, because people can still enjoy the place without sponsored or wanna-be sponsered climbers spraying the fuck out of a route. I have climbed and lived in the west on several occasions and can tell anyone that the climbers in the southeast are the best - friendly, reserved, and eager to belay. Out west is a totally different story. People avoid eye contact and will only acknowledge you if they presume you or your party to be of the same climbing ability.

Back to Seneca. The author climbed only a small portion of the best routes. Yes, Seneca sees a large number of noobs, because it has such a high concentration of the best 5.7/5.8 in the country. Why won't a climber at that level want roofs, cracks, dihedrals, overhanging walls w/ great exposure??? People can learn the basics of multi-pitch without the length of 6 pitches. I mean noobs?? Do we really want to bash noobs?? Hell, anyone can check out the newest wave of noobs - yeah, it is called the gunks. Crowded and full of people waiting to drop gear on your head! I love the gunks, but the place can easily be overrun be too many people.

I climb at Seneca (Yes, 10's 11's) and love the place. Minimal wait with awesome lines. Great scenery and beer/pizza afterwards.

The place just wasn't for the author. Point - just write another article on how great the climbing is out west.


hyhuu


Jan 16, 2010, 4:43 PM
Post #71 of 76 (1147 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
climboard wrote:
I would assume cclarke is referring to Projected Futures, Ronin, and Hishiryo if you want to check the guidebook. They look thin, scary, and beautiful!

Autumn Fire and the Changeling are nice if you haven't been on them. Helter Skelter is also worth getting on. It is 10c in the guidebook but felt like an 11 to me.

Damn Projected, Ronin and Hishiryo look serious.

I've done Changeling. Really good. I''ll try the others

Low Octane, just to the left of Nip and Tuck is also very good. For some reason, I never saw anyone on it. I assume that you've already done the classic Terra Firma.


dreday3000


Jan 16, 2010, 4:48 PM
Post #72 of 76 (1144 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hyhuu wrote:

Low Octane, just to the left of Nip and Tuck is also very good. For some reason, I never saw anyone on it. I assume that you've already done the classic Terra Firma.

Yeah....not yet. I'd like to onsight that one so I've held off on it till now. Been working on my stetch pro abilities and I might try it this season.

Have you done it?


hyhuu


Jan 17, 2010, 5:44 PM
Post #73 of 76 (1103 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
hyhuu wrote:

Low Octane, just to the left of Nip and Tuck is also very good. For some reason, I never saw anyone on it. I assume that you've already done the classic Terra Firma.

Yeah....not yet. I'd like to onsight that one so I've held off on it till now. Been working on my stetch pro abilities and I might try it this season.

Have you done it?

Yes. It took me a couple tries as the sequence isn't obvious to me at all. The footwork was intricate. The gear is straight forward because there aren't many. I took quite a whipper too.


mobls


Jan 17, 2010, 6:23 PM
Post #74 of 76 (1096 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2005
Posts: 10

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I was only there for a day and only got in about 6 pitches of supposed classics, it was cool for a local crag. I remember one of the pitches had the hardest 5.7 roof I have done in 20 years, surely an old school rating though still fun as hell.

There sure were a ton of gumby guides out for training that day, they must make a $$boatload$$ on all the NooBs that pay for TRs.

I would stop in on the way home from the New for a day again, the razorback ridge was super cool.


dreday3000


Jan 17, 2010, 7:40 PM
Post #75 of 76 (1083 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566

Re: [hyhuu] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hyhuu wrote:
Yes. It took me a couple tries as the sequence isn't obvious to me at all. The footwork was intricate. The gear is straight forward because there aren't many. I took quite a whipper too.

Encouraging to hear that the gear (or at least some of the gear) held. The way I heard it, there were some suspect micro nuts that might not be worth placing. I don't mind running it out provided when you find some pro, its got a fighting chance it'll stick.


hyhuu


Jan 17, 2010, 10:15 PM
Post #76 of 76 (314 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 25, 2001
Posts: 492

Re: [dreday3000] Rock and Ice Seneca Article [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dreday3000 wrote:
hyhuu wrote:
Yes. It took me a couple tries as the sequence isn't obvious to me at all. The footwork was intricate. The gear is straight forward because there aren't many. I took quite a whipper too.

Encouraging to hear that the gear (or at least some of the gear) held. The way I heard it, there were some suspect micro nuts that might not be worth placing. I don't mind running it out provided when you find some pro, its got a fighting chance it'll stick.

The gears I placed were solid. I did not use any micronut or any small nut for that matter.


Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook