Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
Superclip or Squid?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 Next page Last page  View All


billcoe_


Oct 1, 2008, 9:47 PM
Post #76 of 117 (4018 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [jt512] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Any chance someone can just do a poll so as to get some numbers and avoid all the fliff-flaff?


billcoe_


Oct 1, 2008, 9:51 PM
Post #77 of 117 (4016 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [billcoe_] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've never used wither one (or a homemade) I'd really like to know what folks prefer.



Shocking, someone who wants some facts.


hafilax


Oct 1, 2008, 10:11 PM
Post #78 of 117 (4013 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [billcoe_] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

But how would I tell you that your poll is flawed but vote anyway?


jakedatc


Oct 1, 2008, 10:51 PM
Post #79 of 117 (4005 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [jmeizis] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Jer.. i agree.. there are routes that have been retro bolted that could have stood to have been left alone. However, at a sport crag and questionable rock strength they would be left to gather lichen and those big giant spiders. I've done a bunch of retro bolted routes and have had fun and would have other wise skipped them. Many people complain about it.. others like me don't care as much. The developers at rumney i think are some of the best it seems. I've never bolted anything so i don't know the reasons many of the routes are rap bolted instead of on lead. I do know that the guys who do put up the routes take a great amount of care to place the bolts where they should be placed and i don't think many are over bolted (there are exceptions and i have been known to skip them) . I have to believe that if Ward Smith and the others rap bolt something then there is a reason for doing so. They have also recently closed off many of the crags to new development to eliminate any squeeze jobs messing with what they have up now.

The only other sport climbing i have done is Lions Head, Ontario.. i have not been out west to witness other situations. It's unfortunate that bad route developing gives sport climbing a bad name out there and then gets mistakenly lumped in with stuff out here.


anthonymason


Oct 2, 2008, 9:33 PM
Post #80 of 117 (3949 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 11, 2006
Posts: 116

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I may have been a bit hasty/nasty, I just get mad because I have worked with land managers who see bolts/draws/ ladders hangin' all over the place and it makes for a difficult relationship when I want to put in a anchor for safety, Land managers that I have worked with really do not like seeing shiny bolts/ladders/stick clips/ sporty climbers, or empty beer cans, cig butts, tape, or fixed ropes/gear at or around the base of cliffs.

Its unfortunate that Land managers- mostly are not climbers and do not understand why we need anchors in the first place, I just feel that when an entire crowd is using stick clips it promotes that kind of mind set.


russell


Oct 2, 2008, 10:49 PM
Post #81 of 117 (3941 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 3, 2004
Posts: 10

Re: [anthonymason] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Pretty simple. If all you have is a stick then just tie a slip knot on the end with a loop big enough to allow a biner through.


(This post was edited by russell on Oct 2, 2008, 10:50 PM)
Attachments: stick.jpg (18.3 KB)


jakedatc


Oct 2, 2008, 11:21 PM
Post #82 of 117 (3929 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [anthonymason] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

anthonymason wrote:
I may have been a bit hasty/nasty, I just get mad because I have worked with land managers who see bolts/draws/ ladders hangin' all over the place and it makes for a difficult relationship when I want to put in a anchor for safety, Land managers that I have worked with really do not like seeing shiny bolts/ladders/stick clips/ sporty climbers, or empty beer cans, cig butts, tape, or fixed ropes/gear at or around the base of cliffs.

Its unfortunate that Land managers- mostly are not climbers and do not understand why we need anchors in the first place, I just feel that when an entire crowd is using stick clips it promotes that kind of mind set.

I think that is a huge jump.. because people don't want to get injured .. which would cause possible access issues that land managers don't want anchor? I think we're done here.. it's not going anywhere.

Putting all sport climbing areas and sport climbers in one group is ridiculous. Every spot is different depending on who owns the land etc. That would be like boulderers should all go to hell because Hueco's access is screwed up and Governor's Stable is closed cuz the newest owner decided he didn't want climbers there.

Oh, and trad climbers are just as bad with access.. people still sneak into Sky Top despite that being a major no no. There have been bolt wars up the wazoo up in the Conway area.. it's not someone with a stick clip causes problems there.


jmeizis


Oct 3, 2008, 8:33 PM
Post #83 of 117 (3892 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think that's what I'm saying about what people want from climbing. People think that it's just a sport crag so it's ok if we bolt those lines. Maybe the first ascentionist told them they should but I doubt it.

Rumney is actually one of the best sport crags I've ever been to. The rock seems relatively bomber to some stuff I've been on. All the bolts are bomber glue in's and they're well bolted. There's good bolting out here for sure but there's a variety. There's everything from bolted R/X climbs to bolted cracks. Which is something I don't see at Rumney, there's not really any variety in the protection of the routes which I think is unfortunate. You won't find a runout there.

It's interesting to talk to older climbers and read about the beginnings of the sport. This is a sport founded in adventure and boldness but has slowly turned into something where the pursuit of physical limits is more important to people. Instead of being a pursuit of variety and adventure its almost like people brought the gym outside. They're too scared to run it out, they're too lazy to build their own anchor. I'm surprised that I don't see people doing climbs for 10 reps or anything like that because it seems to be the next step. There are a lot of skills that the climbing community is losing. Part of it is due to advances in technology but also it's the people who are finding their way to climbing. People used to start climbing outside and went straight into the mountains and now they start in the gym and go out to the sport crag and if they go any farther than that they might try trad climbing.

I guess it's just a little sad to see climbing closer to taking a walk in the park and farther from it's roots.


jakedatc


Oct 6, 2008, 2:19 AM
Post #84 of 117 (3852 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [jmeizis] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There are plenty of places to find R/X climbing... like.. Conway, gunks etc. There CAN be a place to have safe, stout routes with safe bolts. The developers at rumney have a shizit ton of experience and i think they did a solid job. They are still exploring and finding new routes up the mountain. From my side.. i think it's sad you can't just enjoy a nice piece of rock regardless of how it's protected (to a limit.. i'm not talking a bolted crack at IC or something)

oh by the way.. i retract my statement about Squall . i forgot the first bolt was so low.. for some reason i thought you needed a stick OOPS. Repeated it again on lead then TR'd it barefoot :)


kyote321


Oct 7, 2008, 5:33 PM
Post #85 of 117 (3822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

if the badass non-stickclippers are so badass, why don't they just solo the entire route? especially if the crux is before the first bolt.

i stick clip all the time. if u wanna get scared.. go trad climbing! or high-ball bouldering. duh.


joeforte


Oct 7, 2008, 6:00 PM
Post #86 of 117 (3811 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093

Re: [kyote321] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

kyote321 wrote:
if the badass non-stickclippers are so badass, why don't they just solo the entire route? especially if the crux is before the first bolt.

i stick clip all the time. if u wanna get scared.. go trad climbing! or high-ball bouldering. duh.

That's a stupid question. Rarely will refusing to stick clip kill you, like soloing can. duh

And another stupid comment. Bolts were never meant to take the "fear" out of climbing. If they were, we would see bolts every 3 feet, like in the gym. Bolts are used to protect rock that is otherwise unprotectable with gear. Not every climb should be dumbed down to the point where you don't get scared. Go climb some sport routes in the 'dacks... or in Yosemite. They will challenge you both physically AND mentally, but are still plenty safe.

If all you want is a physical challenge, why don't you just go pump some iron?

It is very clear, the different reasons why we climb.


kyote321


Oct 7, 2008, 8:23 PM
Post #87 of 117 (3783 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [joeforte] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

whats wrong with taking fear out of some climbing? and why is focusing on the physical aspect of climbing somehow less than focusing on the fear aspects?

the physical and gymnastic aspects of climbing are easier to focus on when protection and gear isn't an issue. this isn't dumbing down, it is the pursuit of the best one can be on a given route at a given time.

i trad climb on rock that requires trad protection. i have lead up to 11+ placing gear. when i sport climb i clip bolts, pre-place draws, and usually use a stickclip for the first and second bolts (many routes are designed for this).

so, why are our reasons for climbing so different?

oh, and i pump iron too, should i do that with a gun pointed at my head to make it more legit for you?

btw... back from the trad hijacking of this post... i bought a superclip from the disscussions on this thread. a clamp will eventually shralp your quickdraws, if it hasn't already, and i've seen too many squids break.


hafilax


Oct 7, 2008, 9:02 PM
Post #88 of 117 (3774 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [kyote321] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[semantics]I hate the notion that a climb is designed (other than in the gym). Somebody bolting a route may have an intention but the rock can be climbed in any fashion.[/semantics]

I have a hard time imagining why someone would intend you to stick clip the second bolt. What is the first bolt for?


jakedatc


Oct 7, 2008, 9:34 PM
Post #89 of 117 (3767 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [hafilax] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

First bolt could be to keep the rope out of the way. They have bolts at rumney that are like 3' off the ground.. it also works as a redirect for the belayer on steep routes under short roofs. I've also clipped the 2nd bolt on one route because if you clip the first one the rope lays across a hold you need and it screws you up.


kyote321


Oct 7, 2008, 9:42 PM
Post #90 of 117 (3764 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 24, 2005
Posts: 636

Re: [hafilax] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I have a hard time imagining why someone would intend you to stick clip the second bolt. What is the first bolt for?

directional. important on sport routes so the belayer's head doesn't end up in the climbers ass if they fall.


thatguyat99


Oct 7, 2008, 11:29 PM
Post #91 of 117 (3759 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2008
Posts: 121

Re: [chossmonkey] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

chossmonkey wrote:

They cost about $2 and will last as long or longer than your "pole".


And you can still do all the stuff you can do with the other ones if you are any good.

I think my mom said this once...

Beautiful words...


joeforte


Oct 8, 2008, 12:30 AM
Post #92 of 117 (3748 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
They have bolts at rumney that are like 3' off the ground..

I guess maybe I should start looking down more often!

In all honesty, I have never seen, or heard of a bolt 3 feet off of the ground. I'm not saying there isn't, I just have never experienced it. Is there any way someone can post a pic that shows how this would be useful?


jakedatc


Oct 8, 2008, 1:51 AM
Post #93 of 117 (3736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [joeforte] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Don't stop by Monsters very often eh?




sungam


Oct 8, 2008, 2:07 AM
Post #94 of 117 (3732 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Don't stop by Monsters very often eh?

Whoah! intense steepness man!


jakedatc


Oct 8, 2008, 2:22 AM
Post #95 of 117 (3727 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [sungam] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

uhh yep. most things on that wall are .13+ including Parallel Universe 14a, Dr No 13d/14a , Feeding Frenzy 13d (which Kevin Jorgeson solo'd in the Nor-Easter trailer) also a 13a trad route if you're into that kinda thing


jmeizis


Oct 8, 2008, 2:56 AM
Post #96 of 117 (3720 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It seems like the development is done by committee there rather than by individual developers. I'm sure this has it's benefits. I think that Rumney doesn't have to be solely a clip-up, safe as can be, pseudo-gym environment. Yeah people can go to Cathedral or the Gunks if they want run out trad, but what about run out sport? From the routes I've climbed at Rumney it seems to me they all make the same statement: I only want to do safe, hard climbs. That's fine for some climbs, even the vast majority, especially since you can't protect the entire place with gear. I think it would be good for both the climbing community, and the rock to have some bold routes, or some routes that remain gear routes, even if that means they won't get climbed that much.

Think of it this way. If we say that safely bolted sport routes will get the traffic and trad climbs will get less traffic we're already limiting people in what they'll climb. I know a lot of people who are really hard sport climbers but I know very few of them or very few people in general who know anything about any gear besides quickdraws. If someone at Rumney walks by a climb that isn't bolted and thinks, man that looks cool, that might encourage them to learn how to place gear so they can climb it.

It seems that people, especially given the popularity of gyms, start in a safe environment and then seek it out. This is far different from how climbers started a long time ago. In that difference is a set of standards that come to be accepted and others disdained. I have no problem climbing nice, easy going sport routes. I have no problem climbing bold runout trad and sport routes on bad rock. I think that's the difference between me and many other climbers. People don't feel comfortable above trad gear or high above a bolt where they may be on the outer margins of safety so they think it's a bad route. There perceptions are determined by there experiences in climbing.

I have the thought climbing all the time. Man, that climb could really use another bolt (usually I think they could use like four more bolts). Then I remind myself that I chose to climb it and that I could have chosen another climb. I don't seek out the first ascencionist or bring the drill to make it safer. It's not my place or any one elses to make climbing a "safe" sport. The very qualities that make climbing such a fantastic and character building sport are slowly bolted away as more and more people shirk boldness in favor of physical difficulty. Having learned many things from many different climbers and many different climbing experiences I've come to realize a few things. One of the most important things I've come to realize is that as us young climbers become older climbers we will have a legacy to leave to the younger generation of climbers, just as it was left to us. That legacy can be one encouraging superior physical ability and all that comes with that or one that encourages a well rounded ability, physically and mentally, and imagination that will encourage climbing to be something that always remains interesting as opposed to simply a progression of physical strength.


joeforte


Oct 8, 2008, 3:22 AM
Post #97 of 117 (3715 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093

Re: [jmeizis] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jmeizis wrote:
It seems like the development is done by committee there rather than by individual developers. I'm sure this has it's benefits. I think that Rumney doesn't have to be solely a clip-up, safe as can be, pseudo-gym environment. Yeah people can go to Cathedral or the Gunks if they want run out trad, but what about run out sport? From the routes I've climbed at Rumney it seems to me they all make the same statement: I only want to do safe, hard climbs. That's fine for some climbs, even the vast majority, especially since you can't protect the entire place with gear. I think it would be good for both the climbing community, and the rock to have some bold routes, or some routes that remain gear routes, even if that means they won't get climbed that much.

Think of it this way. If we say that safely bolted sport routes will get the traffic and trad climbs will get less traffic we're already limiting people in what they'll climb. I know a lot of people who are really hard sport climbers but I know very few of them or very few people in general who know anything about any gear besides quickdraws. If someone at Rumney walks by a climb that isn't bolted and thinks, man that looks cool, that might encourage them to learn how to place gear so they can climb it.

It seems that people, especially given the popularity of gyms, start in a safe environment and then seek it out. This is far different from how climbers started a long time ago. In that difference is a set of standards that come to be accepted and others disdained. I have no problem climbing nice, easy going sport routes. I have no problem climbing bold runout trad and sport routes on bad rock. I think that's the difference between me and many other climbers. People don't feel comfortable above trad gear or high above a bolt where they may be on the outer margins of safety so they think it's a bad route. There perceptions are determined by there experiences in climbing.

I have the thought climbing all the time. Man, that climb could really use another bolt (usually I think they could use like four more bolts). Then I remind myself that I chose to climb it and that I could have chosen another climb. I don't seek out the first ascencionist or bring the drill to make it safer. It's not my place or any one elses to make climbing a "safe" sport. The very qualities that make climbing such a fantastic and character building sport are slowly bolted away as more and more people shirk boldness in favor of physical difficulty. Having learned many things from many different climbers and many different climbing experiences I've come to realize a few things. One of the most important things I've come to realize is that as us young climbers become older climbers we will have a legacy to leave to the younger generation of climbers, just as it was left to us. That legacy can be one encouraging superior physical ability and all that comes with that or one that encourages a well rounded ability, physically and mentally, and imagination that will encourage climbing to be something that always remains interesting as opposed to simply a progression of physical strength.

I completely agree

And for those trad protect-able routes that are bolted, such as at rumney, just because it is "dominantly a sport area". That's a bad attitude. Just because all the climbs on the wall are bolted, doesn't mean that the crack should be too. Some may argue that it won't be climbed as much, since people rarely drag racks up there. Well, who's to say everything HAS to be climbed? Why not leave a few traditional, a few runout, a few nice and soft? Why does everything have to be dumbed down to a sterile, gym-like setting?

Besides, if you leave it a trad crack, than I'll have something to climb while everyone else is waiting in line for the bolted lines!


jakedatc


Oct 8, 2008, 3:38 AM
Post #98 of 117 (3713 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054

Re: [jmeizis] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There are plenty of routes that aren't super closely bolted at Rumney.. especially the routes at Main Cliff in the Iron man section.. Also trad lines to the right of that area also..

I don't think the major players at Rumney believe that you should have risky falls on bolted lines there. I don't see why someone should possibly get hurt because you want a bold route. screw that. If you're putting bolts in then put them in and make it protect the climb. If you're doing a mixed route.. like Farley and whitehorse.. that kinda thing then the bolts would protect the route where gear could not. With a sport route with no trad gear then you need bolts to protect the climb.. simple as that.

my friend Lee brings trad gear to rumney all the time. He LOVES Black Jack crack.., That Crack, 5.8 by the road, and others when it's busy and doesn't want to wait in line. By the way.. you can still do the retro'd routes on gear.. bolts do not fill any placements. I plan on doing No Money Down with just the original bolt eventually.

Why SHOULD Rumney have to be something that it is not. Guys with Dozens of years of experience have developed it to be the way it is.. Guys that climb hard sport.. hard trad. hard R/X trad have put up sport routes there.

Why do we need push people to learn to trad climb.. who the fuck cares. If they want to do it... they will. Guess what.. I went to Rumney.. took one look at Social Outcast and said FUCK i want to climb that route.. worked my ass off to get strong enough to be able to do it and finally did it.

If you want run out sport climbing go to J-Tree etc out west.. Rumney is NOT the place despite your imagination that it could or ever will be unless you grab a Hilti and go put up your own route way up the mountain with your 3 bolts and long run outs. It's a long ass hike to get to where new routes are going up so you better bring good boots.

Last week Sharma, Dave graham, Joe Kinder, Kevin Jorgeson, Tommy Caldwell, Cedar Wright, Daniel Woods, and Ethan Pringle all showed up to Rumney to attempt to climb a couple of hard, solidly bolted routes. Name a run out sport route that has gathered that kind of attention?

you need to accept Rumney as the sport crag that it is and get over it because there are over a thousand sport routes that will not be changing and the people developing the new routes... are the people who developed the old routes so nothing is changing.

PS last weekend the temps were amazing and it was not very busy at all for a weekend.

Edit: Joe, the routes that are retro bolted are either by the FA, with the consent of the FA or agreed upon by the RCA guys that it's fine to do. If you want to go debate with Mark, Smitty, Ward, Ed etc go over to NEclimbs and speak up. I talked to Tim Sr about Son of Sammy at below new wave and Black dog crack at Kennel and said how much nicer it is to have those not collecting moss and dirt.

If you want to get on routes with no lines show up at 8am and climb.. take a break from noon til 2 then go get on whatever you want. or show up in October when the weekend warriors are gone and the real climbers are the only ones left.

I notice neither of you have FA's at Rumney... perhaps if you put in some work there and put up your own route you could do whatever you wanted with it.


(This post was edited by jakedatc on Oct 8, 2008, 3:45 AM)


joeforte


Oct 8, 2008, 11:21 AM
Post #99 of 117 (3696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2005
Posts: 1093

Re: [jakedatc] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jakedatc wrote:
Why do we need push people to learn to trad climb.. who the fuck cares. If they want to do it... they will.

Who said that? I could care less who climbs what. I'd actually prefer if the gym-gumbies would just stick to clipping bolts for the rest of their life. Last thing I want to see is someone stick-placing a cam!

Don't take it so personal Jake, I don't have any FA's in Rumney, because I don't have the desire to drive 8 hours to go drill some obscure leftover line for people to clip. If I'm gonna drive up there, I'll go look for an FA on Mount Willard.

You can't replace a GOOD HEAD with a LONG STICK!

Sorry, I just had to throw that out there. Wink


scottydo


Oct 8, 2008, 11:40 AM
Post #100 of 117 (3696 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 3, 2007
Posts: 121

Re: [cabdog] Superclip or Squid? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Superclip. I like mine

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook