|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Jul 27, 2011, 12:18 PM
Post #251 of 298
(2388 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. If she waits a couple of months, she'll be a couple months late. I have a feeling that Learner won't be with us for long.
Would setting up a thread with gambling odd on when someone gives up our is banzed a good idea?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 27, 2011, 12:24 PM
Post #252 of 298
(2384 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. If she waits a couple of months, she'll be a couple months late. I have a feeling that Learner won't be with us for long. Would setting up a thread with gambling odd on when someone gives up our is banzed a good idea?
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 27, 2011, 12:35 PM
Post #253 of 298
(2383 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread.
I was just trying to find an excuse to banz him...
But you're right, I still have 6 more days on this job and I'd be sad to end this so soon.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 27, 2011, 12:38 PM
Post #254 of 298
(2380 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Kartessa wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. I was just trying to find an excuse to banz him... But you're right, I still have 6 more days on this job and I'd be sad to end this so soon. 
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 27, 2011, 12:45 PM
Post #255 of 298
(2373 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
sungam wrote: Kartessa wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. I was just trying to find an excuse to banz him... But you're right, I still have 6 more days on this job and I'd be sad to end this so soon. I'ma post your name and employer on here so they can BANZ you from work and free up some of your time for climbing
I'll be back on the rock in 12 days... just enough time to get some shit together on my end
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 27, 2011, 12:53 PM
Post #256 of 298
(2367 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
Akshully, may go owt fer sum TR tonite.
Who don't like gettin spit off slimy/polished/glossy 5.9s?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 27, 2011, 12:54 PM
Post #257 of 298
(2366 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Kartessa wrote: sungam wrote: Kartessa wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. I was just trying to find an excuse to banz him... But you're right, I still have 6 more days on this job and I'd be sad to end this so soon. I'ma post your name and employer on here so they can BANZ you from work and free up some of your time for climbing I'll be back on the rock in 12 days... just enough time to get some shit together on my end
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 27, 2011, 1:20 PM
Post #258 of 298
(2358 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
sungam wrote: Kartessa wrote: sungam wrote: Kartessa wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. I was just trying to find an excuse to banz him... But you're right, I still have 6 more days on this job and I'd be sad to end this so soon. I'ma post your name and employer on here so they can BANZ you from work and free up some of your time for climbing I'll be back on the rock in 12 days... just enough time to get some shit together on my end Keep training and I swear to Sty that you could send .12's outdoors on bolts by the end of this season. I think you are better then you seem to get credit for (including from yourself...).
See? I knew you werent all bad
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Jul 27, 2011, 1:27 PM
Post #259 of 298
(2355 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. If she waits a couple of months, she'll be a couple months late. I have a feeling that Learner won't be with us for long. Would setting up a thread with gambling odd on when someone gives up our is banzed a good idea? Nobody got banned for placing bets as to when my girlfriend would dump me. That thread was definitely way more dickheaded then your thread would be.
Well we're about to find out.
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Jul 27, 2011, 2:39 PM
Post #260 of 298
(2344 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. If she waits a couple of months, she'll be a couple months late. I have a feeling that Learner won't be with us for long. Would setting up a thread with gambling odd on when someone gives up our is banzed a good idea? Nobody got banned for placing bets as to when my girlfriend would dump me. That thread was definitely way more dickheaded then your thread would be.
thats true. sungam put up with a lot of shit on the site, from myself included.
he's all grown up *sniff*
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Jul 27, 2011, 2:41 PM
Post #261 of 298
(2343 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post.
You are correct. The personal attack, and all posts that quoted it, has been hidden and the offending user has been given a time out.
|
|
|
|
|
JoeHamilton
Jul 27, 2011, 4:07 PM
Post #262 of 298
(2313 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 16, 2011
Posts: 815
|
jt512 wrote: JoeHamilton wrote: The intent is that this is an Internet forum, hence a discussion in written form. Thus inclining people to use slang,spell in phonetic form(to emulate personality and accent's) to have a written VERBAL form of communication. That's about the lamest excuse for illiteracy I've ever seen. Like I said, that makes two of you who think that way, the other person, Enigma, being even less comprehensible than you. You might want to think about why skilled writers don't need to use multiple commas or other contrivances to communicate "personality and accent's [sic]" on the Internet. Jay
they also don't pa'k da ca'in ha'vad ya'd 'itha,. Anyway glad I am not alone and not the first. Here's to hopping to refresh and learn .
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jul 27, 2011, 4:20 PM
Post #263 of 298
(2308 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
sungam wrote: Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: Kartessa wrote: Come to think of it... aren't ad-hominem attacks against the TOS? I think that calling someone you don't know a bad parent would qualify. I'll leave that up to someone else if they want to report the post. Meh, it's the scummuity, and a lame insult at best. My advice is to ignore, save up your pent up anger and wait a few months and then really prove him wrong in another thread. If she waits a couple of months, she'll be a couple months late. I have a feeling that Learner won't be with us for long.
Learner shares a number of traits with codefrog. Def not the same people, but similar mode. Agree, won't last long.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jul 27, 2011, 4:21 PM
Post #264 of 298
(2307 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat.
I thought Learner was a she?
GO
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Jul 27, 2011, 5:42 PM
Post #265 of 298
(2294 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
cracklover wrote: sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat. I thought Learner was a she? GO
nope he was creeping on the site. had a thread recycled. he was asking for hot chick climbing pics. he actually pm'd users about their hot climbing pics.
stalkerville
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jul 27, 2011, 5:49 PM
Post #266 of 298
(2284 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
macherry wrote: cracklover wrote: sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat. I thought Learner was a she? GO nope he was creeping on the site. had a thread recycled. he was asking for hot chick climbing pics. he actually pm'd users about their hot climbing pics. stalkerville
That is creepee
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 27, 2011, 7:39 PM
Post #267 of 298
(2263 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
macherry wrote: cracklover wrote: sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat. I thought Learner was a she? GO nope he was creeping on the site. had a thread recycled. he was asking for hot chick climbing pics. he actually pm'd users about their hot climbing pics. stalkerville
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Jul 27, 2011, 8:09 PM
Post #268 of 298
(2254 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
Kartessa wrote: macherry wrote: cracklover wrote: sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat. I thought Learner was a she? GO nope he was creeping on the site. had a thread recycled. he was asking for hot chick climbing pics. he actually pm'd users about their hot climbing pics. stalkerville That is creepee
i could be mistaken and it's a woman creeping on other women
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Jul 27, 2011, 9:43 PM
Post #269 of 298
(2241 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
sungam wrote: macherry wrote: cracklover wrote: sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat. I thought Learner was a she? GO nope he was creeping on the site. had a thread recycled. he was asking for hot chick climbing pics. he actually pm'd users about their hot climbing pics. stalkerville I forgot about that thread. I had written out something funny. Would a mod go and grab my post so everyone can see how funny it is? The one where I rated his creepeeness.
Yeah most of my really funny posts get hidden by the mods too.
That is why every other post here of mine that you can see is crap.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jul 27, 2011, 9:44 PM
Post #270 of 298
(2239 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
cracklover wrote: Learner shares a number of traits with codefrog. Def not the same people, but similar mode.
Why definitely not?
Jay
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jul 27, 2011, 10:02 PM
Post #271 of 298
(2231 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
macherry wrote: Kartessa wrote: macherry wrote: cracklover wrote: sungam wrote: Joe, no one has been attacking you for the past several posts, we've been after learner. Some comments were made because it was annoying that you kept saying that she should have talked to the owner, when she did talk to the owner. She was clearly screwing around when she started the thread in her threats to cut the rope. The only heavy insulting going on here is Learner coming in and being a comeplete jackass to K repeatidly for very little reason. He showed time and time again that he just couldn't help but make attempts at cutting personal insults (not calling someone an asshole, but rather commenting on me having no friends, K being a bad mother, etc.). He deserves every little piece of pwnbread that gets stuffed down his throat. I thought Learner was a she? GO nope he was creeping on the site. had a thread recycled. he was asking for hot chick climbing pics. he actually pm'd users about their hot climbing pics. stalkerville That is creepee i could be mistaken and it's a woman creeping on other women
No, more likely a guy posting as a woman to creep.
Or, more likely still, I just mis-remembered reading that Learner's a she.
Edited to add - maybe I was thinking of Ceebo? Is that a she? So many wackos these days, having a hard time keeping them all straight.
GO
(This post was edited by cracklover on Jul 27, 2011, 10:18 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jul 27, 2011, 10:08 PM
Post #272 of 298
(2229 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
jt512 wrote: cracklover wrote: Learner shares a number of traits with codefrog. Def not the same people, but similar mode. Why definitely not? Jay
No hard evidence, it's just that they seem to take different means to the same ends.
Both take the "I'm a n00b, please take my hand" shtick, but don't you remember the voluminous effervescence of schmaltz codefrog would pour out? Learner is much more hard-edged.
Of course they could both be Dingus, he's more than talented enough. Except that I don't think he has any motivation to troll this cesspool.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Jul 27, 2011, 10:15 PM
Post #273 of 298
(2222 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
jt512 wrote: cracklover wrote: Learner shares a number of traits with codefrog. Def not the same people, but similar mode. Why definitely not? Jay
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Jul 27, 2011, 10:18 PM
Post #274 of 298
(2221 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
cracklover wrote: jt512 wrote: cracklover wrote: Learner shares a number of traits with codefrog. Def not the same people, but similar mode. Why definitely not? Jay No hard evidence, it's just that they seem to take different means to the same ends. Both take the "I'm a n00b, please take my hand" shtick, but don't you remember the voluminous effervescence of schmaltz codefrog would pour out? Learner is much more hard-edged. Of course they could both be Dingus, he's more than talented enough. Except that I don't think he has any motivation to troll this cesspool. GO
Codefrog was / is a real person, it was his photos that doomed his follow up account.
We may need to dig out the language analyzer from that thread.
As for the D man, my guess is that he is still buthrtz from whomever here and will just stay away.
Also, unlike stalking angry (hi!), I can't see if D has logged in recently or not.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jul 27, 2011, 10:22 PM
Post #275 of 298
(2216 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Toast_in_the_Machine wrote: cracklover wrote: jt512 wrote: cracklover wrote: Learner shares a number of traits with codefrog. Def not the same people, but similar mode. Why definitely not? Jay No hard evidence, it's just that they seem to take different means to the same ends. Both take the "I'm a n00b, please take my hand" shtick, but don't you remember the voluminous effervescence of schmaltz codefrog would pour out? Learner is much more hard-edged. Of course they could both be Dingus, he's more than talented enough. Except that I don't think he has any motivation to troll this cesspool. GO Codefrog was / is a real person, it was his photos that doomed his follow up account. We may need to dig out the language analyzer from that thread. As for the D man, my guess is that he is still buthrtz from whomever here and will just stay away. Also, unlike stalking angry (hi!), I can't see if D has logged in recently or not.
Codefrog made very little effort to keep his second account hidden. He actually PMed me to tell me it was him, IIRC. The only really weird thing about all that was him sharing his login credentials with other users, so that codefrog version 2.0 was a them, not a him.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
