Forums: Climbing Information: Technique & Training:
'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out!
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Technique & Training

Premier Sponsor:

 


rockprodigy


Jan 16, 2006, 3:39 AM
Post #1 of 138 (56118 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out!
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well I've finally done it. After many requests, I've finally put down my training program on paper...well virtual paper.

Check it out here:

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...es/index.php?id=2140

It's long, but I didn't want to leave anything out...more detail is always better than less.

Let me know what you think, if you have questions, etc. Hopefully this will generate some good discussion!

Mike


squierbypetzl
Moderator

Jan 16, 2006, 3:53 AM
Post #2 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I saw the pics when they were going through the system, impressive to say the least. Well done.


tyson16v


Jan 16, 2006, 5:26 AM
Post #3 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 4, 2005
Posts: 93

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
It seems every time someone asks a question about training, or attempts to have a meaningful discussion, it doesn’t take long for some moron to chime in with “I train my biceps by lifting a beer up to my fat face.” Insecure and below average climbers love to bash those of us with enough self respect to seek improvement. Someone once said: “Anything worth doing is worth doing well.” I believe this applies to climbing as well as it does anything else in life. I cannot understand the attitude of someone who would spend every weekend out on the rock, but not be at least mildly interested in getting better.

this is by far the best statement in the forums right now.
“I train my biceps by lifting a beer up to my fat face.” i laughed out loud when i read that. im so sick of assholes saying that crap.
rockprodigy, i applaud you. that is a great article that you have made accesible to the masses.


bighigaz


Jan 16, 2006, 6:34 AM
Post #4 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2002
Posts: 696

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Mike, thanks for all the time, effort, and research. I read it, I'm inspired to use it to develop my own training regiment. I was a distance runner myself, and a wrestler as well, combined with avid weight-lifting for almost a decade before I ever became a "regular" climber. When climbing began, everything else seemed to... end. Bad idea, really.

I wanted to throw in my own $.02 of insight that I have gained from mistakes I've made in the past. You might say mine was a poor method of research, but the results of my bad form may be helpful to someone who wants to try to build their own program using your system as a model. (IOW, I'm giving some advice on what NOT to do, and some ideas to FIX the damage that can be caused by transitioning too quickly from one type of training to another...)

This isn't for everyone, but it may help some...

First of all, I currently deal with a few penalties of POOR training (and maybe genetic dispositions...) I have a knee with a mind of its own, that becomes painfully week after "high-impact" exercises (Specifically, RUNNING). I also experience "climbers" elbow/"tennis" elbow, as well as a periodic pain in a shoulder/rotater cuff, both of which severely hinder my climbing ability. Bummer.

I had some extremely good advice from a trainer, and a physician, and I wanted to share it for those who may be in a similar boat as I... especially faithful weight trainers that have cut back or STOPPED weight training all together and taken up climbing.

THIS was my first mistake. I STOPPED lifting weights, and I STARTED climbing. I was never a "power" lifter. I kept my workouts medium and light, maintaining consistent sets, and varying exercises weekly. (the "trick-your-muscles" trick...") Nevertheless, my muscles had been tightened around my joints after years of "pushing," then suddenly they started "pulling." -nothing else. The transition from PUSHING to PULLING did more damage than I realized. And to make matters worse, I gradually started stretching less and less until it ceased to be a part of my workout. (I guess I figured my flexibility would stay the same if I just kept climbing... oops.)

Long story short, my joints became loose and week, and I became prone to injury after about 5 years of nothing but climbing.

I have reached the point that I cannot run anymore without experiencing severe pain for 2 or 3 days afterwords. Then I'm forced to rest until I'm healed. (No good...)

I guess my point here is to share what I've learned about balancing my physical activities.

1. Stretching properly is essential! (Should be a part of your warm up, EVERY DAY!)

2. Pushing your muscle groups is as important as pulling, ESPECIALLY if you have a weight lifting background! Otherwise you will eventually experience loose elongation of your joints. This SUCKS.

3. As Mike so faithfully prepared and shared, organized training is ESSENTIAL to improvement and avoiding injury.

4. Patience. A return to 100% won't happen overnight, ESPECIALLY if you do it the way I did... by learning the HARD way.

So, for me I've decided to develop a solution that will hopefully get me out of the painful box I created, and MIKES system is going to be an integral part of it, combined with cross training involving a physician-recommended RETURN to proper weight lifting. (Again, this is because of my history, and may not be for everyone.) Proper stretching (I've grown fond of Yoga lately, as it seems to break the monotony of traditional stretching... which is painfully boring!), and until I can run without the pain, I'll have to get my cardio by jumping rope, swimming, or riding a bike... Trail running seems to be a less painful option than the street, but it's going to have to wait a bit...

Like Mike explained frequently in his awesome article, each of us will need to adapt the program a bit. For those of you that fall in to my category, ("wearing out"), you might add four weeks of concentrated PROPER weight training, combined with cardio, and some light climbing just to maintain the movement... and the fix. When you start into the phases Mike emphasized, DON'T stop lifting, but cut back to LIGHT lifting (a.k.a "off-season" weight training), once or twice a week, JUST to maintain proper balance of PUSH & PULL for your muscle groups that have grown accustomed to pushing.

Hope that wasn't to much, just wanted to share what I could...

Thanks again Mike for the AWESOME insight and inspiration!


overlord


Jan 16, 2006, 8:05 AM
Post #5 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sweet article. i just skimmed through it and its definitely something to keep in the bookmarks.

just one question. im planning on building a campus board. what angle is your campus board at and do you like it that way? if you could, how would you change it?


tommez


Jan 16, 2006, 10:07 AM
Post #6 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: 46

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've just read it.. Interesting article with good tips I will keep in the back of my head. One thing though. By the tone in your article and by looking at your program it seems like you are climbing to train better, not the other way around.


wrbill


Jan 16, 2006, 10:20 AM
Post #7 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 5, 2002
Posts: 228

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey Mike great post. A great read and will help me to build my work-out plan, something that I have been working on for only about two months. I have one question? That is could you put a link to work-out sheets that is easier to read. I think that would help a lot as they are hard to read. Thanks again for taking the time to put your training plan in righting for the rest of us looking for a plan that as been tested over a long time span. This will mean a lot when it comes to making my own plan with a little adjustment to meet my needs, because of all the hard work that you have done as the “guinea pig”.

Thanks
Bill


rockprodigy


Jan 16, 2006, 5:21 PM
Post #8 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Mike, thanks for all the time, effort, and research. I read it, I'm inspired to use it to develop my own training regiment. I was a distance runner myself, and a wrestler as well, combined with avid weight-lifting for almost a decade before I ever became a "regular" climber. When climbing began, everything else seemed to... end. Bad idea, really.

Great thoughts. I was also a wrestler, and have some chronic shoulder pain from a double arm-bar I was caught in during Districts my sophomore year. I was wrestling two weight classes up because our school was weak in that class, and I got worked! It still hurts now and then, 12 years later!

I completely forgot to mention that I lift weights as well. I usually lift 2-3 times per week. I lift bench press, bicep curls, tricep extensions, reverse wrist curls, and I do some lightweight shoulder exercises. The reps and sets I do would probably fall into the "toning" category: usually 3 sets of 15 reps of each exercise. I started doing the shoulder stuff about 5 years ago, and it has made a huge difference.

In reply to:
just one question. im planning on building a campus board. what angle is your campus board at and do you like it that way? if you could, how would you change it?

My board is 15 degrees off of the vertical. Metolious recommends that angle, and I've always liked it. The only thing I would change would be to come up with some way to take weight off while you campus so that you can transition into doing three and two-finger moves. I have not come up with a good way to do this, though. I think it would also be cool to have a set of rungs that was essentially six identical hangboards stacked on top of each other, but that would be expensive!

In reply to:
One thing though. By the tone in your article and by looking at your program it seems like you are climbing to train better, not the other way around.

You can certainly make that argument, and I won't disagree with you. Many of you may notice my opinions contradict some of the other training experts here, but we've already "agreed to disagree." My rationale for sticking to my training program is that fluctiations in my outdoor climbing performance seems to correlate pretty well with my training cycle, meaning I climb better when my training suggests I should, etc. If my training program were counter-productive, I don't believe that would be the case. I wouldn't rule out some sort of "placebo effect", though.

In reply to:
That is could you put a link to work-out sheets that is easier to read.

I don't know how to do this. Those training sheets were scanned, then submitted as photos. You can go to my photos and they might look better:

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...&period=None&mode=my


overlord


Jan 16, 2006, 6:59 PM
Post #9 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 25, 2002
Posts: 14120

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
just one question. im planning on building a campus board. what angle is your campus board at and do you like it that way? if you could, how would you change it?

My board is 15 degrees off of the vertical. Metolious recommends that angle, and I've always liked it. The only thing I would change would be to come up with some way to take weight off while you campus so that you can transition into doing three and two-finger moves. I have not come up with a good way to do this, though. I think it would also be cool to have a set of rungs that was essentially six identical hangboards stacked on top of each other, but that would be expensive!

thanks. that was helpfull.

one way to do it would be a pulley system, but that would be kinda hard to do. the weight would have to start at the top of the board and the slowly descend. kinda like perpetual TR with tension.

an even better way would be to have a 2:1 or even 3:1 pulley, meaning tha the weight travels less distance. youd need heavier load though.


rockprodigy


Jan 17, 2006, 12:33 AM
Post #10 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've considered the pulley system, but it would be pulling you out as well as up, which could be a problem. It is probably better than nothing, though. You also need to have a lot of travel in the system, but yoiur 2:1, or 3:1 idea would mitigate that problem.


mcgivney_nh


Jan 17, 2006, 1:01 AM
Post #11 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 28, 2005
Posts: 421

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks mike

really great article


jto


Jan 17, 2006, 7:27 AM
Post #12 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Very nice article. Good pointers and interesting throughout. I had to copy it and read it again. Even if I don´t have that much expertice in the field of climbing training, I agree very much on the point that there is no reason to do a lot of ARC´s if your goal is in different kind of routes. I think that was the main thing that popped out good.

Wouldn´t it be beneficial to alter the HYP loads, rep and pause lengths here and there to get more variety in training. If you only use one set pattern (5-7x7/3sec pause) your body will get used to it sooner. You talk about systematic progression but it does not have to be that linear really. The progression has to occur yes, but in the long run.

I try to make my point more clear with an example progression here:
Session 1: 10x5 secs @ 20 lbs / 5 sec pauses
Session 2: 8x6 secs @ 25 lbs / 4 sec pauses
Session 3: 5x3 secs @ 40 lbs / 7 sec pauses, 5x10 secs @ 15 lbs / 5 sec pauses
Session 4: 10x5 secs @ 30 lbs / 5 sec pauses
Session 5: 3x7 secs @ 25 lbs / 3 sec pauses, 3x5 secs @ 35 lbs / 5 sec pauses, 3x3 secs @ 45 lbs /7 sec pauses
Session 6: 8x6 secs @ 35 lbs / 4 sec pauses
etc...

The main point in hypertrophy training from the weigth training point of view (my field) is also adding more volume. Of course it does happen when using a simple set-rep -system too, but it can be greater and that way better if the patterns are changed. Example for let´s say chins (but it could be what ever from hangboards to deadlifts...):
Phase start: 4 sets, 4 reps @ 60 lbs = total volume 960 lbs
After one month: 5 sets, 5 reps @ 65 lbs = total volume 1625 lbs
After two months: 6 sets, 6 reps @ 70 lbs = total volume 2520 lbs
So the amount of work done has increased by 2,6 fold. After that there is a very good base to start the power phase.

(The set-rep-patterns (4x4, 5x5, 6x6) just the make things more clear. Number mantras are not that important.)

About getting weight off when hanging: Stand on a scale to measure how much weight is on your fingers. Quick and very accurate. Not as unmerciful of course as the weight plates :)

Cheers.


piton


Jan 17, 2006, 2:04 PM
Post #13 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 11, 2002
Posts: 1034

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i thought the wrestling matches in Devil's tower parking lot were great for training.


nafod


Jan 17, 2006, 2:50 PM
Post #14 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
My board is 15 degrees off of the vertical. Metolious recommends that angle, and I've always liked it. The only thing I would change would be to come up with some way to take weight off while you campus so that you can transition into doing three and two-finger moves. I have not come up with a good way to do this, though.

There's something out there for you. Google on "jumpstretch" or "therabands". Big long elastic bands that folks use for assisted pullups and assisted muscle-ups. They can also double as a key component for water balloon launchers, so you get twice the fun.


rockprodigy


Jan 18, 2006, 12:32 AM
Post #15 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jto - your comments on volume are very interesting. I think one problem with your suggested protocol is that it varies so much from workout to workout that it would be very difficult to decide how much load to use for each set from one workout to the next. Therefore, it would be hard to get the load just right. You would either be underloading yourself, and therefore not reaching failure, or overloading and risking injury, or not finishing each rep.

Do weightlifters do something similar to what you have suggested, and if so, how do the figure out how much weight to use?


nafod


Jan 18, 2006, 2:19 PM
Post #16 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

From your training guide (many thanks for posting it)

In reply to:
The purpose of the hangboard is to train your forearms, and body builders have long understood that the best way to train a muscle is to isolate it. These other tools do the exact opposite by attempting to train all the various muscle groups involved in climbing movement at once, making it virtually impossible to ensure that any one muscle is stressed until failure.

Two thoughts on that. The first is that body builders build bodies, not athletic strength. Related, but not the same. That's a nit, but I'd be loathe to use them as a key source of training ideas.

The other thought is that there's been some excellent research done by a Dr. William Kraemer (was at Penn State, not sure where he is now) that shows exercising at a very high intensity (whole body movements done at a pace that jacks your heart rate to the max) generates a response similar to taking hormones. It's referred to as the neuroendocrine response. Now, body builders don't need that effect since they are already taking steroids. But for mortals with a fear of needles, it's a path to hypertrophy. Plus you get the aerobic conditioning for free, so it's a two-fer.

So in short, there could be real benefits to either doing grip training as whole body movements, or to wrap grip training into a larger interval training, where instead of resting between grip reps, you are doing something else.

Just food for thought, since you seem to be a thinking kind of guy.


nickh


Jan 18, 2006, 3:33 PM
Post #17 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 19

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

naford,

That neuroendocrine response is really interesting, I've been reading about it lately. On powerlifting sites a bunch of fourteen year olds are always asking how to get bigger biceps, and the lifters tell them to squat.

Would the best way to harness the benefit of that response be by warming up for a hangboard workout with compound movements (squats, deads, pull-ups, 0-lifts.)

Also, does anyone know if that response is still stimulated when using loads that are not optimal for hypertrophy? As a climber I do not want the legs of a powerlifter.

Nick

I did squat for the first time in years two days ago. I also played around with the o-lifts. It was really fun, didn't really feel worked till I bent over a couple hours later and couldn't stand up.


crackers


Jan 18, 2006, 3:57 PM
Post #18 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 416

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

nickh: crossfit gymjones style! check out the schedule from about a year and a half ago...


sidepull


Jan 18, 2006, 4:03 PM
Post #19 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The other thought is that there's been some excellent research done by a Dr. William Kraemer (was at Penn State, not sure where he is now) that shows exercising at a very high intensity (whole body movements done at a pace that jacks your heart rate to the max) generates a response similar to taking hormones. It's referred to as the neuroendocrine response. Now, body builders don't need that effect since they are already taking steroids. But for mortals with a fear of needles, it's a path to hypertrophy. Plus you get the aerobic conditioning for free, so it's a two-fer.

So in short, there could be real benefits to either doing grip training as whole body movements, or to wrap grip training into a larger interval training, where instead of resting between grip reps, you are doing something else.

Just food for thought, since you seem to be a thinking kind of guy.

Thanks for the insight. Could you provide a few examples of each, maybe even say a bit more about the logic behind how this might work?


Partner robdotcalm


Jan 18, 2006, 4:22 PM
Post #20 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
thanks mike

really great article

Dittos
rob.calm


climb1212


Jan 18, 2006, 4:58 PM
Post #21 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 10, 2004
Posts: 46

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Mike,

Thanks for posting a good description and justification for the way you train.

As far as HYP goes, I thought I would throw out an idea.

You write,

In reply to:
The purpose of the hangboard is to train your forearms, and body builders have long understood that the best way to train a muscle is to isolate it.

I’ve altered my HYP phase to include system training on short, predetermined boulder problems emphasizing wide movements and small edges/crimps. This is in addition to hangboard workouts.

Why? It seems that hangboarding and campus workouts emphasize movement in a direction that heavily relies on downward pulling. This is important of course, but what about executing climbing moves that may have good crimps, but are widely spaced. The Rule of Three at Schoolroom is a great example. While the holds are pretty good, the route demands the ability to perform long and difficult movements that are widely-spaced. I’ve noticed this on other routes, too.

While I doubt that this approach builds muscle as rapidly and to the extent that pure hangboard sessions do, it contains a greater element of climbing movement while training the muscles associated with widely spaced moves, at least I would assume so.

In reply to:
I’m quite skeptical that the exercises that go along with these tools even cause hypertrophy. The number and duration of the repetitions, and the load put on the muscle seem more in line with Power Endurance exercises than hypertrophy. The only way to ensure hypertrophy is to load the muscle until failure quickly (not as a result of a pump).

You do have a point. For HYP, though, I designed short sequences that left me completely taxed after about an hour consisting of either 4 or 5 sets. I would imagine that if it were power endurance, I would be on slightly easier routes.

Like you said, the best way is to experiment new methods on ourselves. So I will see how this works.


wyomingclimber


Jan 18, 2006, 5:20 PM
Post #22 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2002
Posts: 152

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
The purpose of the hangboard is to train your forearms, and body builders have long understood that the best way to train a muscle is to isolate it.

I'm curious about this statement. First, because bodybuilders generally aren't all that strong--they're beauty contestants, not athletes. One of those Scandinavian guys from the World's Strongest Man competitions, I imagine, would twist Mr. Olympia's head off like a bottle cap.

Second, developing a muscle in isolation might make it big, but if it's not connected to anything, does it really make you stronger? I mean, preacher curls will give you big biceps, but will they actually help you lift a large rock off the ground?

And finally, is there any evidence that a high level of hypertrophy is desireable for a climber? How much have your hangboard workouts increased your forearm diameter and do you feel this growth was accompanied by a well correlated increase to your climbing grade?

And as far as this neuroendocrine thing, could someone point me to a link? The only thing I can find on the 'net by Kraemer seems to be about why you shouldn't train really drunk.


tenesmus


Jan 18, 2006, 5:22 PM
Post #23 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2004
Posts: 263

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Powerlifters isolate too. I think this is appropriate.


Partner robdotcalm


Jan 18, 2006, 6:06 PM
Post #24 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

I did squat for the first time in years two days ago. I also played around with the o-lifts. It was really fun, didn't really feel worked till I bent over a couple hours later and couldn't stand up.

What's an "o-lift"?


nickh


Jan 18, 2006, 6:30 PM
Post #25 of 138 (56115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 19

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Olympic lifts - The "snatch" and the "clean and jerk" (consisting of two different lifts the "clean" and the "jerk". These lifts are waaay more explosive than typical weightlifting. Like hucking a dyno vs. slab climbing. I used pretty light weights (80#) to get the technique down, but I still felt pretty worked afterwards. I used the info on crossfit's website for form and technique.

Nick


maxdacat


Jan 18, 2006, 6:41 PM
Post #26 of 138 (24867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2004
Posts: 142

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rockprod.

Thanks for the training manual.....one question.....for me a lot of climbing seems to revolve around (the admittedly vague notion) of being able to hold on ie strength on small holds....how would you recommend training this aspect.....campusing.

I find that on some climbs there may be a thin overhanging start which is usually the crux.....not a problem if the holds are bigger or the angle more gentle.

cheers.


jto


Jan 18, 2006, 6:59 PM
Post #27 of 138 (24867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There´s no need to reach failure when doing hypertrophic training. That´s one thing where mr. Hörst is wrong. Anyway, where comes the idea of 5-7 sets? Why couldn´t it be 10 or 3 or 20? I think variety has a big role here too. The only thing that counts is that you can do more work with bigger weights in the future. Again: the progression doesn´t have to be linear. You have good days and bad days.

As there´s no need to reach failure, it´s easy to adjust the load. Just do more or heavier than before. I does not matter if you did let´s say 5x5 secs @ 20 lbs /5 sec pauses earlier. You can do what ever you can this time or settle for an easy progression and just add a few sets or pounds and do the same 5x5 secs.

One thing worth thinking is the pyramid fashion you use when adding weight. You say you do the first set 7x7 secs, the second 6x7secs and the third 5x7 secs. I´m wondering how can you keep the reps the same length (7secs) when adding weight and only cutting one set off.

My version of a pyramid system would be more like this:
1st set: 4x10 secs @ 20 lbs/ 5 sec pauses
2nd set: 4x7 secs @ 40 lbs/ 5 sec pauses
3rd set: 4x4 secs @ 60 lbs/ 5 sec pauses

Four reps is not a magic number. When you can´t reach the settled rep length the set ends there so if you have a good day you can do more reps. Of course if you want to take it easy on the first one or two sets to do good today on the heaviets set you can stop the set before failure.

This is the thing you can try to do better next time: add reps, add weight etc. Again I used simple rep and pause lengths to draw a more clear picture here. I think you can change the rep and pause lengths to move more into power end of strength (let´s say 5x5 secs @ X lbs/ 10 sec pauses) or to the endurance end (let´s say 5x10secs @ X lbs/ 5 sec pauses). the longer the pause compared to the rep the more you hit the power end of strength training. The same with weights.


jto


Jan 18, 2006, 7:27 PM
Post #28 of 138 (24867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

A bit more on weight training as it´s a bit of my field so to speak.

- Bodybuilders ARE usually very very strong. The muscle gets stronger by enhanced neural activity or getting bigger. They are not that strong compared to their weight though. It´s because they do very small amounts of power training. But hey, a 10x250kg deadlift for a 100 kg bodybuilder is a pretty good feat of strength anyway. It´s a beauty contest but the training is very hard basic strenght training. (Basic here is meaning hypertrophic).

- It´s true that bodybuilders are not that good in doing multidirectional work like lifting stones if they don´t train for action like it. Strongmen do. I coach a top Finnish strongman among some other pretty strong fellows (and yes, many of them actually are drug free. Drugs are not my game). Strongmen are strong because they train for being strong. The big muscles come more like as a side effect. The other way around with bodybuilders: the strength is a byproduct. Anyway even if this friend of mine can almost close a number four Captain Of Crush gripper and deadlifts 380 kgs he can´t hang on an inch edge at all. It´s a thing of specifity, again.

- There is NO WAY some training system can give even close the same benefits as drugs. Therefore the neuroendocrine thing is not that amazing a thing. And: bodybuilders do a lot of basic stuff like squat, benches etc. It´s true though that doing multijoint exercises like squat, deadlift etc. has a bigger effect on body growth hormone and testosterone levels than doing curls etc. And: powerlifters take the juice too.

- You can a) be big and strong, b) smaller and strong. It depends of how and why you train. I personally don´t think there really that much use for real or at least overall body hypertrophic training for climbers. Too much extra weight. Look at Dave G´s forearms for example.

- Powerlifters very seldom isolate ie. do some small muscle training. Usually they stress the major lifts; squat, bench and deadlift and use some kind of variations of them like close grip benches etc. This is even more true with olympic lifters. Specifity (!!!).

- Usually the basic period consists of more volume on submax weights around 60-85% of ones max. After that comes the neural period where the muscles are trained with 85-105% weights. The idea here is the same as in
recruitment training in climbing. The firing frequency of muscle motor units are trained to get higher.

A lot of text but some thoughts anyway.
:)


nafod


Jan 18, 2006, 7:57 PM
Post #29 of 138 (24867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Here's an excellent article by Dr. Kraemer on strength training in general.

http://www.physsportsmed.com/issues/2003/0803/kraemer.htm

And here's an excerpt from another article by Dr. Kraemer...

In reply to:
Little is known concerning the testosterone response to varying the sequence of exercises during resistance training. It has been suggested that large muscle-mass exercises be performed prior to small muscle-mass exercises.[1] The hypothesis is that performance of large muscle-mass exercises (i.e. squat, deadlift, power clean) early in the workout may produce significant elevations in testosterone, which potentially may expose smaller muscles to a greater response than that resulting from performance of small muscle-mass exercises only. This hypothesis recently examined. Hansen et al.[28] measured muscle strength changes in the elbow flexor muscles following 9 weeks of resistance training. However, one group performed a workout consisting of elbow flexion exercises only and a second group performed lower-body exercises prior to the elbow exercises. Performing elbow-flexion exercises only failed to acutely elevate testosterone significantly. However, testosterone was significantly elevated when lower-body exercises were performed first, and muscle strength increased to a greater extent as well when both lower- and upper-body exercises were performed. These data provide support for performing large muscle mass, multiple-joint exercises early in a workout and smaller muscle mass exercises later in the workout when training to enhance muscle strength.

and from the same article (paraphrased)

In reply to:
Resistance exercise elevates human GH (growth hormone) through 30 minutes post exercise for both men and women...protocols eliciting high lactate values (e.g. moderate to high in intensity, high in volume, stress large muscle mass, use relatively short rest intervals) tend to produce the most substantial GH responses.

He hammers home the moderate to high intensity, high volume, and short rest meme. Paper is Hormonal Responses and Adaptations to Resistance Exercise and Training, William J. Kraemer and Nicholas A. Ratamess Sports Med 2005; 35 (4): 339-361


jto


Jan 18, 2006, 8:14 PM
Post #30 of 138 (24867 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The above is true as I stated in my text. I recall the first time of reading Kraemers studies as early as 1990 or so. The same arguments then too and I think the study here might be a part II for the older one.

Anyway this is not so well suited for a climber who wants to keep his weight down. Also it´s not so beneficial to train body strength with high lactate stuff as it makes it more difficult to recuperate for climbing.


wyomingclimber


Jan 18, 2006, 8:17 PM
Post #31 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2002
Posts: 152

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
A bit more on weight training as it´s a bit of my field so to speak.

- Bodybuilders ARE usually very very strong. The muscle gets stronger by enhanced neural activity or getting bigger. They are not that strong compared to their weight though. It´s because they do very small amounts of power training. But hey, a 10x250kg deadlift for a 100 kg bodybuilder is a pretty good feat of strength anyway. It´s a beauty contest but the training is very hard basic strenght training. (Basic here is meaning hypertrophic).

We don't disagree here, however I define someone with a poor general strength to weight ratio weak. I also consider someone who cannot use their strength in a novel task to be weak.

As far as bodybuilding being a tough beauty contest, no way. I once saw a show on Miss America contestants and they have it sooo much tougher. 6 hours a day of aerobics on three lettuce leaves, all that hair removal, surgery... The catty mind games alone would leave Mr. America in tears. And then there's the pulling of the duct tape off their butt cheeks. Oy...


In reply to:
- It´s true that bodybuilders are not that good in doing multidirectional work like lifting stones if they don´t train for action like it. Strongmen do. I coach a top Finnish strongman among some other pretty strong fellows (and yes, many of them actually are drug free. Drugs are not my game). Strongmen are strong because they train for being strong. The big muscles come more like as a side effect. The other way around with bodybuilders: the strength is a byproduct. Anyway even if this friend of mine can almost close a number four Captain Of Crush gripper and deadlifts 380 kgs he can´t hang on an inch edge at all. It´s a thing of specifity, again.

Again, I find myself in complete agreement with you. But with climbing, big muscle are a really unfortunate byproduct. The holy grail for a climber would be to get stronger without gaining weight, yes? Therefore I question strong hypertrophy focus (though I may be wrong.) In my 15 years of climbing, I've found muscle size in climbers to be entirely genetic. I have friends that look like they were sculpted by Michealangelo (sp?), but a lot of times I get my scrawny, love handle adorned a$$ up the climb first.

In reply to:
- There is NO WAY some training system can give even close the same benefits as drugs. Therefore the neuroendocrine thing is not that amazing a thing. And: bodybuilders do a lot of basic stuff like squat, benches etc. It´s true though that doing multijoint exercises like squat, deadlift etc. has a bigger effect on body growth hormone and testosterone levels than doing curls etc. And: powerlifters take the juice too.

There are many reasons IMHO that climbing is the greatest sport in the world, but one of the biggest is that it doesn't really respond that well to drugs. I got involved (badly) in bike racing for a while and let me tell you, it's really disgusting.

As far as Dave G's foreams go, they are definitely an interesting example (particularly compared to say, F. Nicole's.) All I can think is that he has such perfect tendon insertions that he can create an enormous amount of force through leverage vs a lot of pulling power.


squierbypetzl
Moderator

Jan 18, 2006, 9:29 PM
Post #32 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2005
Posts: 3431

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
even if this friend of mine can almost close a number four Captain Of Crush gripper....


HC!!! For those who don´t know what that is, a N.4 Captain of Crush gripper is 365lbs, that means excerting 365 lbs of pressure/force with 1 hand!!

damn, you could crush a (choose any body part) with that kind of strength...


jto


Jan 18, 2006, 9:50 PM
Post #33 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wyomingclimber,
As you can read elsewhere in my text we agree in I think all the stuff. Let´s have a beer or three :D

squierbypetzl,
BUT: he still can´t hang on that inch wide edge HAHAHA! :D


rockprodigy


Jan 20, 2006, 12:30 AM
Post #34 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks all of you for your valuable contributions to this discussion! This is exactly why I posted my program, to "fish" for comments from other people.

I'm very interested in this neuroendocrine response. One suggested workout plan for climbers to potentially benefit from this would be this: Warmup as usual (20-30min ARc, gradually increasing the intensity) then work harder boulder problems...possibly steep problems with big holds that won't overly tax your finger strength, but will involve your larger muscle groups, then do your hangboard, or campus board workout. My progressive warmup may be doing this somewhat already, but I don't know enough about the required intensity, duration and volume to know. It would be interesting to measure testosterone levels of climbers as Kraemer did...I suppose some sort of blood sample would be required?

Another thing I would like to point out: My article heavily emphasizes training tools like the hangboard and campus board, but my training does not. What I mean is, I discussed these tools a lot because there isn't a lot of useful information available on them. However, I don't spend that high of a percentage of my total training time on these tools.

The three month schedule I posted has approximately 192 hours of total training time as I've estimated it. For every Hangboard workout, I spend an hour warming up and cooling down by climbing (bouldering), and an hour for the workout, which really is only 15 minutes of total elapsed time on the hangboard...the campus board is even less. Assuming a hangboard workout was a complete hour on the board for the sake of argument, that would only be a total of 10 or 11 hours of hangboard time per training cycle, and 4 hours on the campus board. That's somewhere around 7% of the total training time spent on these tools...the rest (93%) of the time is spent on climbing activities such as ARC, 4x4's or bouldering and climbing outdoors.

Furthermore, my focus on forearm training assumes that your forearm (finger) strength is usually the limiting factor in your climbing. This assumption may not be true for every climber or every type of climbing. However, even a hangboard loads your arms, shoulders, upper back, etc., even in a static hang.

Someone asked about the size of my forearms...I don't know how big they are relative to other people. I think they're about normal, but my wife thinks they're enormous...on second thought...she's right, they're huge. Do you think that hypertrophy isn't useful for climbers? I always thought that the idea of a periodized program was to build muscle mass early in the cycle (HYP), then do power exercises (Max R) to make that muscle mass useful for climbing.

to "maxdacat" - I believe my program focuses heavily on training finger strength as you have asked. My program is pretty far to the extreme of focusing purely on finger strength.

jto - your suggestions on varying rep lengths, rest periods etc. are interesting. I'm not sure I believe you that failure is not necessary. Sure, absolute failure may not be necessary, but don't you want to get as close to failure as possible? Otherwise, why not just do one easy rep and call it good? I will try mixing things up like suggest...god knows it gets boring doing the same thing all the time!

In reply to:
- Usually the basic period consists of more volume on submax weights around 60-85% of ones max. After that comes the neural period where the muscles are trained with 85-105% weights. The idea here is the same as in
recruitment training in climbing. The firing frequency of muscle motor units are trained to get higher.

I believe I am hitting this sort of mix with volume and intensity levels with my mix of hangboard workouts and campusing...at least, that is the intent.

In reply to:
protocols eliciting high lactate values (e.g. moderate to high in intensity, high in volume, stress large muscle mass, use relatively short rest intervals) tend to produce the most substantial GH responses.

This description sounds to me like what we climbers would call "Power Endurance" work because he's talking about high volume, short rest intervals, producing high lactate and getting the heart pumping. I don't know enough about generic weight lifting like squats, and "O" lifts, but do they do that?


nafod


Jan 20, 2006, 2:12 AM
Post #35 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'm very interested in this neuroendocrine response....

In reply to:
protocols eliciting high lactate values (e.g. moderate to high in intensity, high in volume, stress large muscle mass, use relatively short rest intervals) tend to produce the most substantial GH responses.

This description sounds to me like what we climbers would call "Power Endurance" work because he's talking about high volume, short rest intervals, producing high lactate and getting the heart pumping. I don't know enough about generic weight lifting like squats, and "O" lifts, but do they do that?

Oh yeah. I could picture a number of workouts mixing the high intensity stuff with hangboard, where the hangboard time would be your "rest". You could do 30 seconds of burpees or bodyweight squats or dumbbell swings (or some fixed number of reps) then jump on the hangboard to "relax". One thing you'll find is that although you might feel wiped from the hi- intensity set as you clamp on to the hangboard, you'll perform about the same as if you'd just sat on the couch. A worthy lesson in itself. I see this all the time in workouts where as I start up on pullups, my heart rate's maxed out. You want to rest a little, but if you just jump in to the next exercise, you find that you didn't need the rest.

Frankly, I'm not a trainer, so I'd seek better advice from an expert. The crossfit site forum would enjoy blabbering about the idea...it's an interesting question.


jto


Jan 20, 2006, 9:24 AM
Post #36 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well I am a trainer and would like to give some contribution to the discussion.

About failure: what is the difference between failure and absolute failure? In weight training it´s not so good to reach failure (not being able to do any reps) all the time. This is more demanding on the nervous system and usually you have to train less frequently that way. This is bad for technique.

This is very important in difficult multijoint exercises like cleans. Olympic lifters usually train the same movement 3-6 times a week and usually stop the set way before failure.

Anyway when deadhanging I myself have done a lot of sets to failure (not being able to complete the desired rep time) and it has worked very well. Sometimes I even do 3-4 sets back to back either cutting off weight and useing the same hold or moving from smaller hold to a bigger one.

I think variety has a big role here. If you go to failure all the time you reach the peak sooner and that´s it. If you go easier sometimes you can go much longer and have greater gains.

What I mean by easy is not playing with flowers. I mean that I might do a set of 10x5secs @ 50 lbs/5 sec pauses and might be able to do 1-2 reps more. There is plenty of work already and I can leave something for the next time too.

Also going wavelike in your program is very beneficial. You go up in stress and back down to start again a bit higher. A simplified example:
1. 5x5 secs @ 40 lbs/ 5 sec pauses
2. 5x5 secs @ 50 lbs/ 5 sec pauses
3. 5x5 secs @ 60 lbs/ 5 sec pauses
4. 6x6 secs @ 45 lbs/ 4 sec pauses
5. 6x6 secs @ 55 lbs/ 4 sec pauses
6. 6x6 secs @ 65 lbs/ 4 sec pauses

or
4. 5x5 secs @50 lbs / 5 sec pauses
5. 5x5 secs @60 lbs / 5 sec pauses
6. 5x5 secs @70 lbs / 5 sec pauses

etc. there a hundreds of variations how to build up a progression. This way you give your body a rest by training easier every 3-4 weeks. This prevents injuries pretty good and gives a longer progression on weights.

About neuroendocrine training FOR CLIMBERS: What Kraemer means as a high lactic acid training is mainly basic bodybuilding regimen ie 3x10reps etc. This produces enough lactic acid yet the amount of weights are big enough to give good hypertrophic gains. So it´s not PE training really. In climbing the same would be doing something like Hörst HIT-board or bouldering for 10-20 hard moves.

Climbing does not raise your OVERALL level of lactic acids that much even if the forearms are burning like hell. That´s why to have any benefits from this hormonal response you should do some very heavy weight training bedofe hangs. It really matters how you produce the acidic environment. By doing light exercise like jumping jacks of treadmill doesn´t do it. The load is too low. An example again:

After warmup:
- Deadlift, power clean of similar whole body stuff: 2-4 sets, 8-10 reps until failure or very close.
- Hangs or hard bouldering for HYP strength. This doesn´t have to occur immediately after deadlifts.

I don´t think climbers really benefit from this kind of training even if basic strength is ok. The hormonal response from training really isn´t at all that big and you usually need more than one big exercise to produce such a gains. That makes you more like a bodybuilder who trains also his hanging strentgh...


nafod


Jan 20, 2006, 1:28 PM
Post #37 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hypertrophy, women, and climbers...

I always smile when I see women and climbers getting all worried about hypertrophy. "Oh my gosh, if I do squats, I'll swell up like a tick!"

If only it were so easy. Gyms are full of folks desperate to swell up like ticks. My experience with the Kraemer-ish type workouts is I've just gotten stronger. OK, legs are a bit bigger too, but I ski patrol, so that's A Good Thing.

I'm going to have to try a couple of Oly clean/hangboard workouts, see how it goes. On ewhere it's mixed, one where it's not. I'll report back.


jto


Jan 20, 2006, 2:54 PM
Post #38 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

As I have pretty much experience on this field I usually smile then too... In the case of women it´s understandable, they have very much lower hormone levels than men. Although I know a couple of sweet ladies who can´t squat at all as their jeans get smaller immediately...Or is it that their thighs grow. This is very much a genetic thing too.

The muscles don´t come overnight but I really don´t see a point in building ANY excess muscle mass as a climber. I used to be 30 kilos heavier than I´m now and it took me 13 years to gain it and I didn´t even train for hypertrophy. I got strong but luckily I didn´t gain muscles that easily as some do. Anyway I wouldn´t want any of the kilos back when on a route crux shaking in the pool of acids :D

Strength can be trained without any gained mass but workout like that don´t give the same hormonal response as discussed. So I still stand behind my opinion. Anyway (my favourite English word :D ) I wouldn´t stop anybody from trying. One thing that might help from gaining extra weight is keeping the calories on a bit negative side when starting this "neuroendocrine" training. Silly word... why don´t they just use hypertrophic weight training or bodybuilding :)

Cheers.


crackers


Jan 24, 2006, 2:34 PM
Post #39 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 416

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This couldn't have come up at a better time for me personally. After a two year layoff, I am getting back to the gym again for the first time.

What do people think about doing hypertrophy/fingers on the same day as hypertrophy/upperbody? I tried last night night and it just about killed me. I did a finger workout first, and i was just wrecked when i tried to lift (crossfit o-lift workout). I have some question about how rested I was, but I am curious about whether people lift on the same day that they do a climbing hypertrophy workout.


jt512


Jan 24, 2006, 4:19 PM
Post #40 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
This couldn't have come up at a better time for me personally. After a two year layoff, I am getting back to the gym again for the first time.

What do people think about doing hypertrophy/fingers on the same day as hypertrophy/upperbody? I tried last night night and it just about killed me. I did a finger workout first, and i was just wrecked when i tried to lift (crossfit o-lift workout). I have some question about how rested I was, but I am curious about whether people lift on the same day that they do a climbing hypertrophy workout.

I think that if you try to do heavy finger workouts after a 2-year layoff from climbing that you're practically guaranteeing yourself a pulley injury. Stick with lower loads for a few months, doing endurance training.

Jay


crackers


Jan 24, 2006, 4:37 PM
Post #41 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 416

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Let me say that i was doing new route development mixed with actually climbing once a month or so, and that i wasn't going to climbing gyms regularly during the layoff: its been two years without GYMS not without climbing. Additionally, I am already did a gradual plastic build up to get to the point where i am comfortable with hypertrophy training again.

But that's besides the point: Do people who lift do hypertrophy training for their fingers on the same day, or even in the same workout as they lift? What experience do you have with that?


jto


Jan 24, 2006, 7:35 PM
Post #42 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have 190 lbs left in me and some still from my weight training career so I avoid all hypertrophic training like a poison. Other type of strength and power training is done of course. I usually train my fingers only when climbing but sometimes I do some finger and wrist curls when doing weights. This never happens the same day before climbing workout. I might do other kind of strength workout or run for few miles during the day if I have easier climbing workout in the evening.

I´ve had good experiences mixing dynamic and static strength in training with weights so I see finger curls have their place in training for climbing too but IMHO very marginal one.


rockprodigy


Jan 25, 2006, 12:33 AM
Post #43 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Crackers - I will sometimes lift after my hangboard workout, but my lifting routine is pretty quick. I will, however, usually eat a soy protein bar (in addition to lots of water, and maybe gatorade) immediately after my hangboard workout, then lift. That seems to raise my blood sure enough to make it through lifting before I eat a proper meal.

jto - you keep hinting at other stuff you do for "strength and power" that is not hypertrophy. Could you elaborate?


bigrock


Jan 25, 2006, 3:23 AM
Post #44 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2005
Posts: 12

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Two weeks rest every 3-4 months sounds like a lot. I don't know a lot of committed climbers that take that much continuous time off. But then I also know a lot of climbers with overuse injuries. I would be interested in hearing opinions on how much rest is optimal? Of course you need rest days every week. My opinion is that at least 3 rest days/week from climbing workouts is about right. But how about the continuous two weeks off? I would be interested in other opinions on how long and often the extended rest should be.


jto


Jan 25, 2006, 6:42 AM
Post #45 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockprodigy,
The main thing is to keep the reps low enough to avoid excess hypertrophy and high enough to stimulate the protein metabolism. Also the total volume has to be usually quite high. If the reps are kept in the normal hypertophic range of 6-12 it´s easier to gain weight.

Example: take a load you can do pretty comfortably 3x4 reps with. Let´s say 3x4x200 lbs. This could be around 80% of the one rep max. Then try to up the volume with that weight or preferably add some. You might have a goal of 6x6x210 lbs in a two month time span. The reps don´t have to be done to absolute failure as it is not required to gain strength. The progression keeps going as the body is adapting to the higher volume.

You can also do this with only one or two "work sets" done to or very close to failure but usually you hit the wall sooner. At least you have to keep changing the reps and perhaps do some variations of one exercise to keep thing going. For example you can switch between different width grip bench presses. Anyway the closer to the failure you go the more time you need to recover.

Both systems can be used in the same period once again to give lifter some added stimulus. After this basic period it is time to recruit. Then the weights are added over 90% of one rep max in usually all the work sets.

Choose only basic exercises like bench, chins, deadlift, cleans and alike as they have better effect on more muscles at the same time and serve more the coordinative stuff too. Train 2-3 times a week per exercise and keep every 3rd or 4th week easier to help the progression.

I use the above model also for powerlifters during the basic period before starting to get ready for a comp. This kind of a system is good as they usually want to keep the weight down for the certain weight classes.


norsky


Feb 1, 2006, 6:12 AM
Post #46 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: 9

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

[quote="rockprodigy"] I spend an hour warming up and cooling down by climbing (bouldering), and an hour for the workout

Is that an hour for warming up and another hour for cooling down? Seems like an hour for both combined would be ample.

Great article!


sidepull


Feb 1, 2006, 3:28 PM
Post #47 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockprodigy (and others)- how would you change your work out if your goals were more focused on bouldering?

I know that your forte is hard bigwalls (which isn't to say that your bouldering skills are unimpressive), but say you were thinking "this season I want to send Black Lung or the Mandala or run laps on Copperhead (or maybe get the elusive v13 sit repeat)" what would you do differently?

Obviously I'm asking because I don't see hard Zion FA's in my future, but would love to wrestle harder pebbles this coming fall. Thanks.


rockprodigy


Feb 1, 2006, 3:40 PM
Post #48 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That's a half-hour to warmup and a half-hour to cool down, for an hour total.

For bouldering, I would reduce the Power endurance phase, possibly not do it at all...it depends on if you're trying those lame enduro-boulder problems that aren't boulder problems at all, they're actually routes that are four feet off the ground, or if your'e trying an actual boulder problem.

If you're climbing something that's ten moves or less, that you can complete in a minute or less, then a simple set on the hangboard is probably all the endurance you need.


manacubus


Feb 2, 2006, 6:13 AM
Post #49 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2002
Posts: 141

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just wanted to thank rockprodigy for putting together the article. In particular, the hangboarding stuff filled a hole in my phased training that was missing.

I've now rigged my own hangboarding system (with conterweights and a stopwatch), written up my own training plan, and did my first session a few days ago. It'll be interesting to see how my grip strength on the rock is affected.

I'd be many further steps behind the 8-ball without rockprodigy's article, so thanks again Mike!


manacubus


Feb 6, 2006, 11:58 PM
Post #50 of 138 (24866 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2002
Posts: 141

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Another post from me!

I’m now in my HYP phase, and do two sessions of that per week (one intense weights/lactic tolerance gym session, and one hangboarding session). Now let’s say I go out on the weekend and climb a bunch of long, hard, power endurance routes. How detrimental do you think that is to the effectiveness of a phased program? Am I sabotaging myself?


rockprodigy


Feb 7, 2006, 1:34 AM
Post #51 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's hard to say...it depends on the intensity.

What's your weekly schedule look like?


manacubus


Feb 7, 2006, 5:59 AM
Post #52 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2002
Posts: 141

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Schedule during HYP phase is roughly as follows...

Mon - Hangboarding HYP. 1.5 hour session.
Tue - Strength and lactic tolerance (non-climbing) training. Intense!
Wed - rest
Thu - Indoor climbing in the gym. Just doing routes, not much structure.
Fri - rest
Sat - Outdoors. Medium to high intensity, not bouldery routes however.
Sun - rest

I realise that not everything I'm doing directly relates to HYP but I'm meeting you halfway :D


tommez


Feb 7, 2006, 9:58 AM
Post #53 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: 46

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Tue - Strength and lactic tolerance (non-climbing) training. Intense!

What kind of training do you do? Run? Row? Doing weights?


up_for_a_good_time


Feb 7, 2006, 4:54 PM
Post #54 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 111

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So, you're a zoomie, eh? Think we beat you guys again this year. Train harder.

USNA over USAFA anyday.


aimeerose


Feb 7, 2006, 7:45 PM
Post #55 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 574

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There are some good principles in this program (specifically periodization), and some dangerous ones as well.

I think everyone should be cautioned about weighted training. While this can lead to quick muscle hypertrophy, tendons build strength much slower. Thus, you risk tendon injury when your muscles get stronger too quickly. Also, prolonged straight-arm hanging, especially weighted, can lead to stretching out the joint capsule and ligaments of your shoulder. This can lead to instability, and therefore shoulder injuries.

Finally, it is important to do rotator cuff exercises and exercises for the middle and lower trapezius as well as the serratus anterior in order to keep the shoulders healthy for climbing. Also, it is very important to stretch the pecs and biceps.

Just some thoughts.


manacubus


Feb 8, 2006, 2:25 AM
Post #56 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2002
Posts: 141

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Tue - Strength and lactic tolerance (non-climbing) training. Intense!

What kind of training do you do? Run? Row? Doing weights?
Nothing aerobic like running or rowing. This is a personal training program (two clients to one trainer) which goes for about 45 minutes and focuses on strength and lactic tolerance in specific large muscle groups. The exercises in the sessions are tailored to the sport you're pursuing, so my stuff focuses more on upper body, and the only leg stuff I do is ballistic or lactic (such as squat jumps or squat holds), rather than hypertrophy (pushing big weights) to avoid unwanted weight gain in the legs.

The main reason I do this training is for overall conditioning, and strengthening opposition muscles that don't get trained effectively during climbing. This should help to prevent me getting injured (and I have stayed injury-free). Another focus of many of the exercises is on core strength, which is something that is often overlooked in climbing training, but is very important. Upper body exercises in the sessions might include:

- various kinds of push-up's
- various kinds of pull-up's
- various kinds of bridge holds (holding a stable position on elbows and toes)
- eccentric's (where you're being pulled down from a pull-up)
- one arm pull-up's and lock-off's
- single arm dumbbell presses
- single arm pull-downs
- bent over rows
- uneven weight bench presses

I have been doing blocks of this kind of training for about a year, and find it's effective. While you're doing this training, you are not climbing your best, because your body is being flogged to death, but when you stop and move on to the next phase, the benefits begin to show.


shear


Feb 8, 2006, 12:50 PM
Post #57 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 15, 2004
Posts: 350

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
rockprodigy (and others)- how would you change your work out if your goals were more focused on bouldering?

I know that your forte is hard bigwalls (which isn't to say that your bouldering skills are unimpressive), but say you were thinking "this season I want to send Black Lung or the Mandala or run laps on Copperhead (or maybe get the elusive v13 sit repeat)" what would you do differently?

Obviously I'm asking because I don't see hard Zion FA's in my future, but would love to wrestle harder pebbles this coming fall. Thanks.


I just started my training phase to be ready for the spring season. it is as follows:


Monday:

-warm up, easy traversing and easy to moderate problems. stretching
-3 sets 4x4's (hard sets) 5 min rest between sets (no falling on last set at all)
-fingerboard - repeaters, 10 sec on 10 sec off...use all holds possible. 3 sets of 10 frenchies to finish off.
-cool down, stretching

Tuesday:

-rest/recovery: 4 easy lead routes, 5.9 and under. 10 easy TR routes, 5.10 and under
-stretch

Wednesday:

-chest, triceps, abs, cardio...lots of stretching

Thursday:

-warm up, stretching
-moderate 4x4s, 3 sets, still no falling on last set.
-fingerboard, same as monday.
-cool down
-shoulder work

Friday:

-rest

Saturday:

-go climbing for fun, either inside or out, whatever the weather allows.

Sunday:

-rest.


then as time progresses, 3 sets of 4x4s becomes 4 sets, and falling is allowed on the last set. the idea is to be completely zapped by the last set, so getting that right is hard. gradually increasing your difficulty each set is key without tiring too quickly.

eventually, i will incorporate campusing after a firm amount of time on the hangboard.


rockprodigy


Feb 8, 2006, 3:03 PM
Post #58 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Schedule during HYP phase is roughly as follows...

Mon - Hangboarding HYP. 1.5 hour session.
Tue - Strength and lactic tolerance (non-climbing) training. Intense!
Wed - rest
Thu - Indoor climbing in the gym. Just doing routes, not much structure.
Fri - rest
Sat - Outdoors. Medium to high intensity, not bouldery routes however.
Sun - rest

I realise that not everything I'm doing directly relates to HYP but I'm meeting you halfway :D

That schedule looks fine to me...I don't think you would be over-training.

In reply to:
I think everyone should be cautioned about weighted training. While this can lead to quick muscle hypertrophy, tendons build strength much slower. Thus, you risk tendon injury when your muscles get stronger too quickly.

It is true that muscle grows faster than tendons...I believe I adressed this in my article, and I consider it one of the benefits of my training because increases in intensity are controlled, as opposed to the standard method of random bouldering which is completely uncontrolled.

I don't remember if I mentioned this, but it is important that you DON'T HANG STRAIGHT-ARMED. You should always have a slight bend in your arms and shoulders.

Rotator Cuff exercises probably wouldn't hurt. I have been known to do them, when I remember.

In reply to:
USNA over USAFA anyday.

Yeah the climbing in Maryland is soooo much better than CO.

Shear - what's the purpose of your fingerboard work on Mon and Thur? The way you have it scheduled, i.e. immediately after 4x4's, I don't think you are building any strength. Maybe some endurance.


ben


Feb 8, 2006, 3:20 PM
Post #59 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 20

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don't want to shit on anyones parade but in my experience the best was to climb hard problems is to get on something hard and just work it for months. if you can stay motivated you will see huge improvements really quickly- this summer I jumped 5 grade in 4 months from the ocasional v6 to v11 simply by getting out and cranking on the hardest problems I could find (after warming up- that shit is imporatant). the way i see it if you have a good day training you just end up spent or maybe be able to campus or do weighted hangs a little longer. were as after I have a good day I am worked but usually have made progress on or have sent a hard problem which feels more rewarding and motivating. Praxis my friends is some key beta.


Partner tim


Feb 8, 2006, 3:38 PM
Post #60 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 4, 2002
Posts: 4861

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I don't want to s--- on anyones parade but in my experience the best was to climb hard problems is to get on something hard and just work it for months.

What if someone's more interested in freeing big walls than climbing V11?

Just a thought.


shadowsandwich


Feb 8, 2006, 3:46 PM
Post #61 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 3, 2004
Posts: 55

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rockprodigy-
I'm curious about the 5 sec intervals between each 10 sec rep. Is there any particular reason for this (as it strikes me) rather short amount of time? Have you simply refined this time after trial and error as the amount that yields best results for you?

The reason I ask is that I've tried your hangboard workout and I felt like perhaps a slightly longer pause between would feel less awkward.

Also, you mentioned that the key to improvement (hypertrophy phase) was the increase the weight a specific percentage each time. Say perhaps you increased the weight for your next session from +15 (completed) to +20 on a certain hold but were unable to finish the set for the +20.
-Would you a) continue at the +20 until you finished the set but just hold it as long as you could or b) attempt to adapt your weight mid-session?
-Also, would you still attempt to increase the weight for the following session or continue with the +20 until a successful set was completed?

Great Article!!!


aimeerose


Feb 8, 2006, 4:25 PM
Post #62 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 574

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah, in the pics when you're on the hangboard, your arms are pretty straight.

I did skim the article, so I missed the reasoning behind why this program would strengthen your tendons better than any other. I'll reread it.


aimeerose


Feb 8, 2006, 4:50 PM
Post #63 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 574

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Okay, I looked at it a little closer. It seems that you say the reason you won't injure your tendons is because it's a regimented program, not random. But, this still doesn't address the fact that muscles hypertrophy much faster than tendons get strong. There's nothing we can really do about this except be hypervigilant to finger pain and hopefully stop climbing before popping a pulley or pulling a long finger tendon. However, I think everyone should be cautioned about weighted climbing/pullups. Although weighted hangboard training could have some benefit to the tendons, as long as you keep the elbows bent.

Also, this is a small detail, but "climber's elbow" is actually brachioradialis tendonitis, not medial epicondylitis (that's "golfer's elbow" and we sure don't want to share a condition with golfers! ;)) It is true that medial and lateral epi are very common among climbers as well though.

I am very impressed at how disciplined you are! That is amazing. As a PT and CSCS I know what I need to do to train, but it's so hard to do it!


organic


Feb 8, 2006, 4:56 PM
Post #64 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 2215

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Yeah, in the pics when you're on the hangboard, your arms are pretty straight.

I did skim the article, so I missed the reasoning behind why this program would strengthen your tendons better than any other. I'll reread it.

I don't understand this post. Do you mean actual tendons, or pulleys? Do you want your tendons strengthened to avoid tendonitis? Tendons are already super strong and increase in strength quickly. Ligament and pulley injuries I think are far more common than any hand tendon injuries.

This article talks about tendon repair but I think it can be somewhat related to normal tendons.

"The tendon is weakest days 5-21 due to minimal tensile strength. Strength increases rapidly when tendon is stressed. Controlled stress is applied proportional to increasing tensile strength. Stressed tendons heal faster, gain strength faster, and have less adhesions and better excursion. Tensile strength begins to gradually grow stronger at 3 weeks."

http://www.emedicine.com/orthoped/topic94.htm
----------------------------------------
"Average tensile strength of tendons is between 45 and 125 MPa."

"The tensile strength of a healthy tendon is more than twice that of muscles."

http://faculty.washington.edu/jsanders/BIOEN440.6.pdf


aimeerose


Feb 8, 2006, 5:18 PM
Post #65 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 574

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Tendon strength may be more that twice that of muscles for untrained muscle, but not necessarily for hypertrophied muscle. Muscles get stronger much faster than tendons. The powerpoint to which you refer states that tendons increase in tensile strength quickly, but this is only after they are surgically repaired. It also assumed the tendons are completely healthy, which climbers' tendons rarely are. If there's any hint of tendonitis, the tendon is compromised.

And the powerpoint does only relate to repaired tendons, not normal ones. The healing cascade does not occur when there is no insult to the tendon. Normal tendon is a completely different beast than repaired tendon. There would be no reason for an unrepaired tendon to suddenly get weaker at 5-21 days.

Yes, pulley injuries are much more common that long tendon injuries, but I have seen quite a few long tendon injuries. They take a long time to rehab, so they are best to be avoided.


organic


Feb 8, 2006, 5:28 PM
Post #66 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 2215

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hmm, if it was true that tendon strength was more than twice muscle, we would all be pulling muscles not straining tendons! That may be true for untrained muscle, but not for hypertrophied muscle. Muscles get stronger much faster than tendons. It also assumed the tendons are completely healthy, which climbers tendons rarely are. If there's any hint of tendonitis, the tendon is compromised.

And the article you found does only relate to repaired tendons, not healty ones. The healing cascade does not occur when there is no insult to the tendon. Healthy tendon is a completely different beast than repaired tendon. There would be no reason for healthy tendon to suddenly get weaker at 5-21 days.

Yes, pulley injuries are much more common that long tendon injuries, but I have seen quite a few long tendon injuries. They take a long time to rehab, so they are best to be avoided.

Read the article, you are arguing measurements and research with opinion and of course the whole weaker at 5-21 days doesn't matter but was included for context and clarity.


aimeerose


Feb 8, 2006, 5:35 PM
Post #67 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 574

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reread my post, I edited it for "clarity".

The article also refers to post-op situations. Tendons do not build strength nearly as fast in non-operative situations. This is not opinion, but supported by research as well.


rockprodigy


Feb 8, 2006, 6:57 PM
Post #68 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Aimee, Thanks for posting, I appreciate your input...you obviously have a lot of knowledge.

I have no scientific research to back this up, but my opinion is that a disciplined, metered approach to training is far less likely to cause injury than the haphazard approach most climbers employ. I believe the difference is in control. The haphazard approach has no controls, just the occasional wild dyno to that really positive two-finger pocket that usually ends in a loud "pop".

I have to laugh at your comments about discipline. In many other sports (swimming, running, cycling, bodybuilding, powerlifting, and on and on...) athletes follow disciplined, regimented training programs as a rule, not an exception. In fact, for most runners who compete occasionally, or train for a marathon, they are almost all on some sort of training program. They would never just go out and run randomly, so why should climbers be different? Is our sport not "physical"? Are we really more like golfers than runners? Most climbers train more like golfers than runners.

Sorry about the bad photos...that is my wife, and the photo was intended to show the weight system, not her technique. My bad.



Shadowsandwich - The rest interval between reps is meant to closely mimic weight lifting and simulate the work/rest ration you might experience while climbing. Your typical rest between reps of bench press, for example, is almost nothing. I would encourage you to experiment if you want. These days I only have 3 sec rest between reps. You certainly don't have time to doddle...that's why it's critical to have a good hangboard in a cool location so you don't have to chalk up between every rep.

To answer your questions about increasing weight...once I start a set with a chosen weight, I usually stick with it until the set is done, even if I can't complete each rep. Very rarely I might just terminate a set if I'm the weight is so much that I'm not even getting close. This more likely happens on the later sets in the workout, when fatigue is adding up. In those cases, I would probably try the same weight for the next workout, rather than increasing, though if I felt really good that day, I might increase anyway. It's tricky to figure out, but as you gain experience, it will be easier to make these decisions.


rockprodigy


Feb 8, 2006, 7:07 PM
Post #69 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I don't want to s--- on anyones parade but in my experience the best was to climb hard problems is to get on something hard and just work it for months. if you can stay motivated you will see huge improvements really quickly- this summer I jumped 5 grade in 4 months from the ocasional v6 to v11 simply by getting out and cranking on the hardest problems I could find (after warming up- that s--- is imporatant). the way i see it if you have a good day training you just end up spent or maybe be able to campus or do weighted hangs a little longer. were as after I have a good day I am worked but usually have made progress on or have sent a hard problem which feels more rewarding and motivating. Praxis my friends is some key beta.

Wow, that's quite an improvement. It sounds like you were nowhere near your physiological peak at V6. You're probably right that it's possible to tick a really big number by camping out under one route or problem for months, or years on end (just go to Rifle on any summer weekend to witness this phenomenon). I'm not sure that means you have improved as a climber, though.

A person who sends 14a after 132 days working on one route has not achieved the same level of mastery as one who spends 5 days to send a 14a. And if "level of master" is really what we are seeking, I would be even more impressed by someone who could flash 13a consistently, and at different crags, with different climbing styles, than a climber who can tick a big number by working a route down to their level.


aimeerose


Feb 8, 2006, 9:24 PM
Post #70 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 21, 2003
Posts: 574

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

True, those sports are more disciplined, and I feel that it's because they are promoted more for the competitive aspect whereas rockclimbing is more recreational (such as golf, although I hate to compare us to golfers!) Thus, I think your program is good for competitive climbers and those trying to push their limits (and who's bodies can handle it). I think "recreational" rock climbers should focus more on injury prevention so they can keep climbing as long as possible.

After thinking about it, I do think hangboard training could promote tendon strengthening. It just needs to be done in a very controlled environment, which is what you promote. I wonder how bent the elbows need to be. That's something I'm trying to figure out presently. It is so important not to stretch out the shoulder capsule and ligaments!


rockprodigy


Feb 8, 2006, 9:56 PM
Post #71 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I wonder how bent the elbows need to be. That's something I'm trying to figure out presently. It is so important not to stretch out the shoulder capsule and ligaments!

This is a good question...if you figure it out, please let us know.

I would suspect that it is best to vary the position so that you are not stressing your elbows and shoulders in exactly the same positions with every rep, set, workout, etc. This is why I discourage people from doing lots of pullups on a hanboard because it forces your hands into the same exact position, and therefore really pinpoints a recurring stress on your joints.


manacubus


Feb 8, 2006, 11:15 PM
Post #72 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2002
Posts: 141

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Just my opinion, however I don't believe the elbows have to actually be bent, as such. I feel however that the muscles surrounding the elbow and the shoulder need to be engaged, so that you're not dead hanging. The result is arms that look pretty much straight, however you're not stressing your joints.


ben


Feb 9, 2006, 3:55 PM
Post #73 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 20

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

for tim i would say that the best way to climb big walls is to live on a big wall and just send on that shit constantly, but I don't climb big walls yet so my advice is a moot point. However since in my post I was talking about strategies to boulder harder I don't know what big walls have to do with anything.
Rock prodigy you raise an interesting point but about climbing consistantly and becoming a better climber, but in my (limited) experience i found that climbing has more to do with how much climbing I do than how much training I do. for example you suggest campus training- I suggest climbing so that you can use your feet in every instance through flexibility and technique- how often are there absolutely no possibilities for foot placement outside? you can even smear on a 45 or roof to take weight. with regards to being able to flash most routes instead of camping on one hard one.. for me sending v8 or v9 is pretty casual because it just isn't as hard or painful- take the example of getting on a v4 instead of a v6 and the level of pain has dropped into a comfortable area. When I was climbing v6 i was training heavily instead of climbing and i could campus like a champ but it just didn't translate to outdoors hence my adversion to training except for hangboarding and stretching.


zozo


Feb 9, 2006, 3:59 PM
Post #74 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 3, 2004
Posts: 3431

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Rock prodigy you raise an interesting point but about climbing consistantly and becoming a better climber, but in my (limited) experience i found that climbing has more to do with how much climbing I do than how much training I do.

mmmm-kay :roll:


Partner tim


Feb 9, 2006, 5:02 PM
Post #75 of 138 (23822 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 4, 2002
Posts: 4861

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
for tim i would say that the best way to climb big walls is to live on a big wall and just send on that s--- constantly, but I don't climb big walls yet so my advice is a moot point. However since in my post I was talking about strategies to boulder harder I don't know what big walls have to do with anything.

Mike (rockprodigy) has successfully applied his training strategies to freeing some pretty heinous bigwall routes, where falling off at certain points would likely lead to serious injury. My point was simply that becoming a better boulderer has a good deal of overlap with freeing long, hard routes, but they're not identical, and I don't see why the training should be.

Your advice about freeing big walls, as you say, is a moot point. Mike's done so, for several FFAs in Zion, so being more of a long-route person than a boulderer, I find more interest in his methodology. As your methodology is supported (at least in your case) by impressive results for bouldering gains, so also is his for freeing longer routes.

That is what freeing walls has to do with anything -- this article is by a guy who has pulled off some spectacular ascents of hard, poorly protected aid routes, where a degree of confidence in one's abilities (perhaps due to extensive and metered testing of said abilities during training) seems to have contributed to noteworthy successes. That's closer to what I, personally, am after in this sport. To each his own.

I am nervous about using a hangboard due to my medial epicondylitis, but I've been working on various antagonist movements, so I think I shall begin this regimen on my Rock Rings and the other crap hanging from the roof of my garage, and see what happens. If your training strategy is working for your goals, then by all means keep it up and send that shit!

In reply to:
When I was climbing v6 i was training heavily instead of climbing and i could campus like a champ but it just didn't translate to outdoors hence my aversion to training except for hangboarding and stretching.

Oddly enough, and please understand that I don't even boulder V6, let alone V11, but oddly enough, I get about the same results from campusing that you do (eg. it doesn't apply well to my leads). That may just be a reflection of the type of routes I enjoy -- a regular climbing partner of mine has a project that spits me off where he rests due to superior finger strength. He is not very confident for his strength (relative to my overconfidence in spite of my weakness) so I wonder if the mental issue is playing a big role in holding him back, too. Nonetheless he is Teutonically systematic about training and redpointing, and he's starting to get me into that sort of mindset (the best training for climbing, is climbing).

It seems self-evident that, if you *could* be climbing and you choose to train instead, you are making a decision to become better at the movements you train, rather than the movements you wish to climb. Still, Wolfgang Gullich pushed the envelope partly due to his training (for monos) and partly due to his consistent climbing -- finding the right balance point is something that I don't think has been systematized yet. (?)

Something else that occurs to me is that, if it's raining, or shitty, or a near enough sport or bouldering area with problems/cruxes that mirror your projects can't be reached, a different problem is present than motivating to swim, or run, or hit the tackling dummy, or run formations as in other sports. If instead of training for a specific problem or route, you're interested in raising your overall onsight level on diverse routes/problems, does the same camping-out strategy work as well?

My original comment was a bit flip, and for that I apologize, but my experience (rehabbing from a couple of violent injuries complete with nerve damage) is that starting from a baseline and combining both climbing with specific training produced the fastest overall gains. Hence my skepticism about focusing solely on sending particular problems in order to raise one's overall level.


sidepull


Feb 9, 2006, 8:25 PM
Post #76 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Rock prodigy you raise an interesting point but about climbing consistantly and becoming a better climber, but in my (limited) experience i found that climbing has more to do with how much climbing I do than how much training I do. for example you suggest campus training- I suggest climbing so that you can use your feet in every instance through flexibility and technique- how often are there absolutely no possibilities for foot placement outside? you can even smear on a 45 or roof to take weight. with regards to being able to flash most routes instead of camping on one hard one.. for me sending v8 or v9 is pretty casual because it just isn't as hard or painful- take the example of getting on a v4 instead of a v6 and the level of pain has dropped into a comfortable area. When I was climbing v6 i was training heavily instead of climbing and i could campus like a champ but it just didn't translate to outdoors hence my adversion to training except for hangboarding and stretching.

It seems to me that without the base you built by doing all of the is training that didn't seem to translate that you wouldn't have had the conditioning to make such a radical jump in performance. In other words, while you couldn't find a problem that replicated campusing and therefore the skill didn't seem to translate, the stress placed on the tendons and muscles prepared you to try increasingly more stressful problems without quickly incurring an injury that would have cut short your progress. In other words, your experience is still highly tangled up in training and your progress is arguably more due to training enabling you to camp out on hard problems rather than the camping itself. Imagine the average beginning climber: if he or she were to camp out in front of midnight lightning for months it's perhaps more likely that the result would be a blown tendon or a shoulder injury and not better climbing specific strength. Seige tactics in bouldering won't work unless you have the fitness to support it.


elemental


Feb 9, 2006, 8:58 PM
Post #77 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2003
Posts: 11

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Aimee and Mike...and everyone else...
The hangboard joint-angle question has been a big one for several years. The important thing in fingerboard workouts is to avoid a dead "lockout" on the shoulders and elbows. The arms can still be straight, but the joints must be held under active tension. I am almost certain you do this already, Mike.

Active tension is achieved by "faking" the start of a pull-up, tensioning the muscles of the back and shoulders (your shoulders will spread a little and your torso may come up a few centimeters...). This allows the joints to move into an active position - where they are LESS LIKELY to sustain injury.

We've messed around with lock-offs of 10, 45, 90, 135 degrees, but these all tend to take the focus off the fingers. I think the straight hang is the "golden fleece" of measurable, sustainable improvement in finger strength. That being said, I'd say good finger strength is about 3% of what it takes to climb well.

Steve


manacubus


Feb 9, 2006, 11:15 PM
Post #78 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 15, 2002
Posts: 141

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'd say good finger strength is about 3% of what it takes to climb well.
It depends what you define as 'well', but when you're already climbing 'well' (i.e. at an advanced to elite level), the stumbling block to reaching that next measure of difficulty is often directly related to finger strength.


ben


Feb 10, 2006, 12:19 AM
Post #79 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 20

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

word tim thanks for the thoughtful post- I'm lucky in that living in halifax, nova scotia within 30 minutes at the most of tons of good boulder problems means that i can get out alot- thus the camping out technique. I agree that camping out on a X rated trad climb/big wall is definately not the best training programme unless you feel like dieing but for me onsighting stuff takes alot of the fun out of climbing so I don't often climb stuff where not onsighting means death. different strokes eh? but for training for hard boulder problems I stick by my guns that climbing is the best way to get strong quick.

in regards to the midnight ligtning/noob comment- I was lurking under a v10 when I could barely climb v5, and I was fine.

ps. for anyone offended by all the grade spraying i'm sorry about that but just saying really hard boulder problem makes it hard to quantify the advantages of climbing to train.


organic


Feb 10, 2006, 1:24 AM
Post #80 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 2215

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
for tim i would say that the best way to climb big walls is to live on a big wall and just send on that s--- constantly, but I don't climb big walls yet so my advice is a moot point. However since in my post I was talking about strategies to boulder harder I don't know what big walls have to do with anything.
Rock prodigy you raise an interesting point but about climbing consistantly and becoming a better climber, but in my (limited) experience i found that climbing has more to do with how much climbing I do than how much training I do. for example you suggest campus training- I suggest climbing so that you can use your feet in every instance through flexibility and technique- how often are there absolutely no possibilities for foot placement outside? you can even smear on a 45 or roof to take weight. with regards to being able to flash most routes instead of camping on one hard one.. for me sending v8 or v9 is pretty casual because it just isn't as hard or painful- take the example of getting on a v4 instead of a v6 and the level of pain has dropped into a comfortable area. When I was climbing v6 i was training heavily instead of climbing and i could campus like a champ but it just didn't translate to outdoors hence my adversion to training except for hangboarding and stretching.

You make an interesting point but it is not completely valid. #1 as you said you were strong initially, you probably needed technique to supplement your strength so "just climbing" helped a lot. Most people are the opposite. Also it seems either a.) you put in a lot of time climbing b.) you have natural predisposition to climbing. If you are sending V10 consistently and not just "your type of problem" then at some point in time you must have trained your weaknesses or at least focused on improving them. Rockprodigy's training program is a systematic way to improve strength in many areas which "just climbing" will not do.


sidepull


Feb 10, 2006, 1:43 AM
Post #81 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
but for training for hard boulder problems I stick by my guns that climbing is the best way to get strong quick.


While I realize that this is your preference the point is that this claim is confounded by the fact that your previous training arguably provided the base to make this leap. It's simply impossible to separate the two. In fact, it's likely that you correlate your success with "seiging" because that occured after the training and therefore the training was further removed from the success and so it was harder to see the connection.

In reply to:
in regards to the midnight ligtning/noob comment- I was lurking under a v10 when I could barely climb v5, and I was fine.


That doesn't discount my point for two reasons: 1st, I already noted that your training most likely put you in a position to not get hurt, 2nd, the grade difference between noob (v0-1) and Midnight lightning is bigger than v5 to v10.

I'd like to hear other's opinions on this. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe noobs would just fall off.

In reply to:
ps. for anyone offended by all the grade spraying i'm sorry about that but just saying really hard boulder problem makes it hard to quantify the advantages of climbing to train.

I don't think you were spraying at all (in fact as someone who's hovered in the v5-7 range for two years I'm a bit jealous) but grades don't necessarily quantify things. If you can hang holds you couldn't before and if you're feeling stronger then more power to you. While that most likely translates to bigger grades it might not.

I'm not trying to be antagonistic at all, but if you should head to J-tree or Fontainbleau or Castle Hill or any other area that features rock and angles that are radically different than what you climb on and see how many v9's you onsight. I'd bet the number drops significantly. Does that mean you've regressed? No, it means grades don't quantify things and therefore you don't provide a compelling case for why climbing sans training is superior to climbing facilitated by training.

In fact, in anecdotal evidence to the contrary, DrTopo had a movie about the FA of a Canadian 5.14 a year or so ago. They showed like 4 different climbers working the route. Three of them were well-rounded climbers and one was a guy that had never climbed harder than 5.12 but had been trying this route for a long time. Guess who got the FA - not the siege-tactics guy, not even close.


ben


Feb 10, 2006, 2:11 AM
Post #82 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 5, 2004
Posts: 20

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks for both your well thought out replies- I believe that by working problems that I can't do I am training my weaknesses-since i can't do a move then by definition that move is a weakness for me, therefore by not giving up and consistantly working my weaknesses i.e problems that i initially fell off I am getting stronger. like I said before I don't like flashing problems or even necessarily sending them, for some perverse reason I have more fun working and failing then sending. a good day out would be "hey I fell of x v12 97 times but got one more move as opposed to the day when I actually send.


organic


Feb 10, 2006, 5:01 AM
Post #83 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 2215

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
thanks for both your well thought out replies- I believe that by working problems that I can't do I am training my weaknesses-since i can't do a move then by definition that move is a weakness for me, therefore by not giving up and consistantly working my weaknesses i.e problems that i initially fell off I am getting stronger. like I said before I don't like flashing problems or even necessarily sending them, for some perverse reason I have more fun working and failing then sending. a good day out would be "hey I fell of x v12 97 times but got one more move as opposed to the day when I actually send.

Just because you get better at something doesn't mean you are working a weakness. If I work a V10 sloper problem but can't do a V7 roof problem, then working the V10 might help but working the V7 would be working my weakness.


sidepull


Feb 10, 2006, 5:17 PM
Post #84 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
. . . for some perverse reason I have more fun working and failing then sending. a good day out would be "hey I fell of x v12 97 times but got one more move as opposed to the day when I actually send.

I actually like that attitude and it's probably a big reason for your success.


danabart


Feb 13, 2006, 12:29 AM
Post #85 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 24, 2004
Posts: 159

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Aimeerose,

You mention that there is strong evidence that tendons gain strength more slowly than muscles. Could you pm me the info? I've done several Medline and Sportsdiscus literature searches as well as checked out several orthopedic texts focused specifically on tendons, and I was never able to find any information/references that addressed or supported that idea. Thanks.


jto


Feb 13, 2006, 6:46 AM
Post #86 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I´m not aimee and I have no reference to show right now but I think the main reason is that there is a huge difference in blood flow when comparing muscle and tendon areas. That´s why tendons heal slower too.

I´m a strength and power coach and see way too many tendon injuries occurring to steroid users (no, they´re not my cattle). That happens because the muscle really does get stronger faster and the tendons can´t keep up. Usually the tendon rips out of the bone but many times also from the muscle end. I haven´t seen so many injuries where the tendon has injured in the middle of it.

rockprodigy,
Still haven´t tried my fingerboard system? :D


rockprodigy


Feb 13, 2006, 6:28 PM
Post #87 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Actually, I just started incorporating some of your ideas. Last week, instead of doing my regular Hangboard routine:

For each grip position (7 each):
7 reps x 7 sec w/ 3 sec rest
2 min rest
6 reps x 7 sec w/ 3 sec rest
2 min rest
5 reps x 7 sec w/ 3 sec rest

I did this instead:

For each grip Position (7 each):
5 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest
1 min rest
5 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest
1 min rest
4 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest
1 min rest
4 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest

I figure this is about the same volume as I usually do, but it's an additional set, so next time, I will add reps, and thus, increase the volume, like you have suggested.


sidepull


Feb 13, 2006, 6:56 PM
Post #88 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

do you do each grip in succession before you go to the next set? and what order to you do your grip training (I assume hardest grip to easiest)? That just looks like a lot of hanging.


jto


Feb 13, 2006, 7:52 PM
Post #89 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sounds ok. I think you´ll have very good gains if you keep changing the rep and pause lengths too. I still stand behind my line: "you don´t have to reach failure in every set". And that comes from 15 years telling people what to do with iron. :D

Anyway if you want to reach the failure it would be easy to change only the rep system every workout like this and keep the pauses the same:
- sets with 10 sec reps and 3 sec pauses.
- sets with 7 sec reps and 3 sec pauses.
- sets with 4 sec reps and 3 sec pauses.
This way you can use bigger and bigger weights every workout. When you come back to 10 sec reps again you´ll use more than the last time etc.

Lot´s of blaa blaa, but I´d love to see it work really good for you.


organic


Feb 13, 2006, 8:34 PM
Post #90 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 2215

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Actually, I just started incorporating some of your ideas. Last week, instead of doing my regular Hangboard routine:

For each grip position (7 each):
7 reps x 7 sec w/ 3 sec rest
2 min rest
6 reps x 7 sec w/ 3 sec rest
2 min rest
5 reps x 7 sec w/ 3 sec rest

I did this instead:

For each grip Position (7 each):
5 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest
1 min rest
5 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest
1 min rest
4 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest
1 min rest
4 reps x 7 sec w/3 sec rest

I figure this is about the same volume as I usually do, but it's an additional set, so next time, I will add reps, and thus, increase the volume, like you have suggested.

Wouldn't you want to increase rest times? Lots of secondary muscles are involved especially cause the excercises are so similar wouldn't you want to increase those rests so you could push your other muscles further?


jto


Feb 15, 2006, 12:50 PM
Post #91 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think more relevant issue is the change in the rep and pause length as it determines how much work is done per rep. I think the 7 sec rep and 3 sec pause protocol is in no way carved in stone.

One could hang longer or shorter reps and rest more or less (the latter is not so easy as 3 secs is already a very short rest and there´s no possibility to chalk up etc.). The only think that matters is that there is progression in volume and weights. I think playing around with different microlevel workout structures keeps things more progressive and interesting. This doesn´t mean that the macrolevel workout plan is somehow unstructured. No way. The opposite in fact.

I´m in no position to give advice to a person who climbs a number higher grades than me but as it is my field in someway I think I could keep up the discussion anyway haahaa.

Cheers.


lemon_boy


Feb 15, 2006, 8:48 PM
Post #92 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks for the great article rockprodigy. i have been using the hangboard quite a bit over the last 5 years and i definitely think it has helped. actually, i should say that i know it has helped because i have kept a climbing log the entire time and i have improved a lot.

also, thanks to elemental for the input on elbow bend and shoulder stuff. i have always hung fairly straight armed, but with my back and shoulder muscles fairly tight. for the most part it seems like i haven't had any shoulder problems. however, the last year or so my left shoulder has felt a little weird, but i think it might be from sleeping in a poor position. when i sleep, my left arm looks like it has me in a headlock. probably not too good.

i have also had very good results in controlling elbow tendonitis with the hangboard workouts. i really do think that it is true that having a very defined workout schedule, complete with warmups and pre-determined sets of various excercises and reps, can help prevent tendonitis. i have been climbing for approximately 17 years and the first 12 years of that time i had a lot of mild to medium elbow tendonitis. in the last 5 years i have had virtually no elbow tendonitis, and i have been climbing at or above the grades of the previous years.

one of the best things about the hangboard workouts are that you can kind of tailor them to the different areas or routes that you climb. in particular, fingery areas like shelf, penitente, etc lend themselves very well to hangboard training. a few weeks ago i built a couple of "devices" to help train for the ringlock sizes (.5 to .75 camalot) on desert cracks. i can't wait to see how it turns out.

i have some questions for the people in this thread about rep length, rest length, etc. but this post is already to long. i'll be back a bit later.


nafod


Feb 15, 2006, 9:00 PM
Post #93 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Tonight's crossfit workout is:

- 30 dumbbell snatches at 30 LBs per DB
- 30 pullups
- Run 800 meters

Repeat that 3 times.

I've got a bit of tendonitis going on, so I'm to try and do some hangboard action instead of the pullups. Currently pondering how to make the switch. I'll report back tomorrow...


sidepull


Feb 16, 2006, 12:02 AM
Post #94 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

you can do 30 pull ups in one continuous set? moreover, you can repeat that set 3 times?

sorry about the drift.


nafod


Feb 16, 2006, 2:06 PM
Post #95 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
you can do 30 pull ups in one continuous set? moreover, you can repeat that set 3 times?

sorry about the drift.

I can do a single set of 30 pullups, but...

I do kipping pullups instead of dead hangs. Turns an isolation exercise into a full body exercise. Really works the abs if you do them right.

The goal of the workout is do it in as short as time as possible (circuit training), so it actually goes faster to break up the 30 into mini-sets with 10-15 seconds between them. Going to failure puts you in a hole and takes longer before you can start cranking again. In the last round of 30 I'm usually doing 4-5 pullups per miniset.


utkukaynar


Feb 21, 2006, 2:16 PM
Post #96 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 10, 2003
Posts: 2

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Hypertrophy, women, and climbers...

I'm going to have to try a couple of Oly clean/hangboard workouts, see how it goes. On ewhere it's mixed, one where it's not. I'll report back.

Why don't you try Tabata-ing for climbing related movement. I mean, in CF "Tabata This", you do 8 sets of 20 seconds of movement with 10 sec. rest between each, four rounds for four different exercise. It's easy to combine a moderate weight C&J and/or Deadlift with hangboard or bouldering.

Give it a try, and post the results for us to enlighten..


nafod


Feb 21, 2006, 4:22 PM
Post #97 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 5, 2003
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Hypertrophy, women, and climbers...

I'm going to have to try a couple of Oly clean/hangboard workouts, see how it goes. On ewhere it's mixed, one where it's not. I'll report back.

Why don't you try Tabata-ing for climbing related movement. I mean, in CF "Tabata This", you do 8 sets of 20 seconds of movement with 10 sec. rest between each, four rounds for four different exercise. It's easy to combine a moderate weight C&J and/or Deadlift with hangboard or bouldering.

Give it a try, and post the results for us to enlighten.

Been thinking of it. I don't have wall in my garage, so have to wait for spring thaw. Ideally there'd be four problems. Maybe a slab super high step, a dyno to a jug, a roof move, and something else. All reversible. I could count reps of each for 20 seconds, 8 sets per exercise, 16 minutes total, for the "tabata this".

Did the oly lift/hangboard thing. One problem is oly lifting is a heck of a grip and forearm workout in and of itself (if you lower the weights controlled). So later I did a burpee/hangboard workout. A burpee is where you squat down and put hands on ground, kick feet back into pushup position, do pushup. Suck feet back under body, and jump up as high as you can. I did 10 burpees/20 seconds hangboard crimps. You're heart rate is maxed during hangs, but grip is fine. Interesting effect. Still exploring.


goob3r


Mar 1, 2006, 12:38 AM
Post #98 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 6, 2006
Posts: 219

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...p.cgi?Detailed=66513

See what happens when you juice!

bad steroids, bad!


jto


Mar 1, 2006, 10:10 AM
Post #99 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

what kinda comment is that???

a) rockprodigy has turned into a female because of the excess steroid use!
- no, because he earlier stated the person in the pic is his wife/girlfriend.
b) huge weights are only possible when using steroids!
- no, because the weights are not huge in the pic.
c) steroid use in general makes peoples hair grow!
- no, because in males the effect is quite opposite.
d) bad steroids are lurking around the bigger holds and the person in the pic doesn´t see them and is in danger to get attacked.
- could be right.
e) something else?


ajkclay


Mar 1, 2006, 12:32 PM
Post #100 of 138 (23818 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2002
Posts: 1567

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
what kinda comment is that???


e) something else?

:roll: well I thought it was obvious he was saying that it looks like she has grown testicles :roll:



Adam


rockprodigy


Mar 1, 2006, 2:29 PM
Post #101 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:

See what happens when you juice!

bad steroids, bad!

I thought it was funny!


jto


Mar 1, 2006, 5:43 PM
Post #102 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I don´t because the pink strings hanging on MY testicles are pretty annoying... :lol:

haahaa.

oh well. too much spare time. makes me too serious. vacations suck.

rockprodigy, how is your training going?


adklimber


Mar 1, 2006, 7:44 PM
Post #103 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I believe this was asked early on, but I have not seen an answer. What about the 2 week rest period? This does seem long, especially if you are doing it a few times a year. I understand if you are a fairly new climber, but I have heard of top level climbers hardly taking a day off.


crackers


Mar 10, 2006, 3:23 PM
Post #104 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 416

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I felt like crap when I tried to integrate climbing exercises into a CF workout. The aerobic intensity drops off so precipitously that it's just a rest, no matter how hard i'm pulling or how hard the route. (all things being equal of course)

I much prefer doing full CF workouts and full climbing workouts. I've done things like tabata this in the climbing area, but the point of tabatas is to keep on the verge of anerobic failure, which i just can't do climbing. Fight gone bad or similar can work as a climbing workout very well.

I'm working up to do 30 muscleups in a row.

Oh and have replaced your rings with ice axe handles yet? make 'em outta pvc pipe and 6mm cord...


rockprodigy


Mar 10, 2006, 5:06 PM
Post #105 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program...Check It Out! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I understand if you are a fairly new climber, but I have heard of top level climbers hardly taking a day off.

You can either choose to take the time off, or have your body make that decision for you, in the form of injury.

I don't know if I know any "top level climbers", and I'm not sure how I would know if they were taking time off because I think the magazines probably don't want to publish headlines like:

"Graham spends two weeks surfing so that he doesn't blow a tendon"

"Caldwell watches TV for three weeks straight!"

I suspect that "top level climbers" all take time off. Granted, our idea of time off and theirs might be different.


sidepull


Mar 10, 2006, 5:45 PM
Post #106 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I felt like crap when I tried to integrate climbing exercises into a CF workout. The aerobic intensity drops off so precipitously that it's just a rest, no matter how hard i'm pulling or how hard the route. (all things being equal of course)

I much prefer doing full CF workouts and full climbing workouts. I've done things like tabata this in the climbing area, but the point of tabatas is to keep on the verge of anerobic failure, which i just can't do climbing. Fight gone bad or similar can work as a climbing workout very well.

I'm working up to do 30 muscleups in a row.

Oh and have replaced your rings with ice axe handles yet? make 'em outta pvc pipe and 6mm cord...

Please translate into english.

CF = crossfit?
Tabata = no clue
fight gone bad = brad pitt sequel?
muscleups = ?

please let me be lazy and not continually depend on google to make sense of this :wink:


crackers


Mar 10, 2006, 5:56 PM
Post #107 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2005
Posts: 416

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's not lazy, it's energy conservative.

CF = CrossFit.

Tabata = Particular Interval type originally developed for speed skaters by a dr. tabata. In this protocol, you do 8 rounds of exercise in 20 seconds of exercise followed by 10 seconds of rest. You should finish in 4 minutes. You can do practically any exercise.

Fight gone bad = crossfit circuit workout with 5 stations and 1 rest. So you do three rounds in 18 minutes or five rounds in 30 minutes. The official exercises are throw a heavy ball at the wall and catch it while doing situps, deadlifts, box jumps, push press and rowing. You can substitue virtually anything, the idea is to switch muscle groups after each exercise. Push press to row for example.

Muscle-Ups = pull up to mantle. Perferable you do it on rings or with ice axe handles.

"top level climbers don't rest" yeah, cause they're traveling to trade shows and the next big climbing destination or eating christmas dinner. :roll:


sidepull


Mar 14, 2006, 9:01 PM
Post #108 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
It's not lazy, it's energy conservative.

I wasn't implying you're lazy, I was stating that I was. Thanks for the translation - does riding a horse on a trampoline count as a cross fit exercise? I mean does RHTing = CF?


rockprodigy


Apr 11, 2006, 9:14 PM
Post #109 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

About a month ago JTO asked how my training was going. I didn't reply because I didn't have anything interesting to report.

Well, now I'm about half way through my performance phase.

I redpointed my first 13c two weeks ago...it took me three days and about 5 tries total. The route is at the gorilla Cliffs in Utah, a short bouldery climbing area. The crux section of the route is about 20 feet long with about 15 total hand movents to get through the "business", so I climbed it at the beginning of my PE phase, when I had a "power peak".

The next day I did my hardest ever on-sight at 12d. I was especially proud because I feel it was a route that does not "suit" my style...it was a juggy roof climb. This contradicts what I just said because I hadn't done any PE workouts (4x4's) at this point in my training. So this suggests that maybe I could on-sight even harder if I spent more time on it.

Last weekend I climbed my second 13c, so it has been a very good season in terms of progress.


athletikspesifik


May 16, 2006, 8:47 PM
Post #110 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 6, 2005
Posts: 50

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yeah RockProdigy! Nice redpoint, I should add the 12d on-sight as impressive also. Rob Pizem says you NEVER climb anything easy - he's got mad respect for you. Knowing how hard the P-Man climbs, that is saying alot. Good luck on future sends with the "Champ".

Dave Wahl


jto


May 17, 2006, 11:08 AM
Post #111 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Concratulations Mike. Way to go!
:)

According to what we spoke earlier on the subject of volume and stress, did you change your hangboard sessions and did you benefit from those? I mean just strength here, no grades.


rockprodigy


May 18, 2006, 1:01 AM
Post #112 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Yes, I did play around with the volume as you suggested. I don't have time to go into detail now, but I will fill you in later.


norsky


Jun 14, 2006, 3:51 PM
Post #113 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: 9

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rest Question:
I'm coming up on my first rest "phase" in a week. What activities/workouts do you guys do? I'm thinking aerobic every other day.


Any lifting/abs/anything else?

Cheers,
Haakon


rockprodigy


Jun 16, 2006, 5:23 PM
Post #114 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Personally, I like to think of it as a psychological break as well, so I try to stay away from anything regimented and just do "fun" stuff like mt. biking, kayaking skiing, hiking, frisbee golf, horseshoes...whatever you would like to do if you weren't rock climbing.


norsky


Jun 16, 2006, 9:40 PM
Post #115 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: 9

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Relaxing and having fun sounds perfect. It feels great to have a complete cycle under my belt. I'm climbing at or above my best level. This is impressive for me these days as I have two daughters under the age of three. Hangboarding in the garage, and efficient structured use of my time has been the key.

Thanks for sharing your training beta with me!
Haakon


rockprodigy


Jun 19, 2006, 6:15 PM
Post #116 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm glad it's worked for you. That is the essence of my training plan...making the most out of a limited amount of time. I've got a 1 yr old, and I can't imagine how busy you must be with two!


tscupp01


Sep 6, 2006, 3:55 PM
Post #117 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 25, 2005
Posts: 5

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm curious what people think about adding some extra anaerobic endurance to this current plan (RP's). For example, during the power phase in which you are mainly training on a campus board, what about circuiting easier boulder problems in a fashion similar to a 4x6 but of a lower intensity following campusing. For example, if your typical power workout started with a warmup or easy climbing for 15 min, followed by a 30-60 min campus board workout, then maybe 2-4 sets of 6 easy boulder problems with 2-5 minutes of rest between each set (consume protein/sugar blend drink following circuit), and lastly a 20-30 min aerobic climbing session (ARC).

This circuit above is medium intensity but enough to be in the anerobic range. In contrast to a strict power-endurance or completely anaerobic training cycle, in which a v6 boulderer would do a PE session of a 4x4 of problems ranging from v2 to v5-, this session would be limited to v0-v2+ problems. I'll explain more later on why I think this method might be advantageous but I'm curious to see what other people's thoughts are on this or if anyone has attempted this sort of plan. Basically my premise is that waiting a month or two between concentrated anaerobic training seems somewhat long to me and the idea of creating a base anaerobic phase before strict PE training seems it might help. Also training aerobic and anaerobically appears to mutually improve one another. But I'll add more later when I get the chance...


sidepull


Sep 6, 2006, 10:52 PM
Post #118 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Yes, I did play around with the volume as you suggested. I don't have time to go into detail now, but I will fill you in later.

did you ever provide this update - I'd be interested in your changes.


jto


Sep 7, 2006, 11:27 AM
Post #119 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

me too...obviously.

I train strenght and power ahtletes and just out of curiosity and semi-scientific interest I had four of my friends with pretty much similar background in weightlifting to participate in a little test. they had done only occasional grip training before.

Two (A and B) were to try a routine where volume and weights a changed quite a lot as in normal strenght training and other two (C and D) started a more monotonous routine using only one rep length of 10 secs. the idea was to develope the bar grip by hanging from a chin up bar with extra weight.

Both groups trained grip three times a week and averaged around 10 sets of hangs per workout,

Here are the results:

person A, bodyweight 100kgs
starting best hang: 12 secs @ 50kgs
best hang after three months: 14 secs @ 115 kgs
+ 2 secs and 65 kgs

person B, bodyweight 85 kgs
starting best hang: 10 secs @ 70 kgs
best hang after three months: 10 secs @ 120 kgs
+ 50 kgs

person C, bodyweight 95 kgs
starting best hang: 10 secs @ 75 kgs
best hang after three months: 12 secs @ 100 kgs
+ 2 secs and 25 kgs

person D, bodyweight 110 kgs
starting best hang: 10 secs @ 55 kgs
best hang after three months: 11 secs @ 85 kgs
+ 1 sec and 30 kgs

no journal material here at all but a nice test. the thing here to point out is the difference made in the variation. the same thing would be if someone trained with the same set lenght (let´s say 5 reps) all the time. the variation is the KEY.


sidepull


Sep 7, 2006, 5:06 PM
Post #120 of 138 (23985 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jto,

could you:

1) explain the last lines of each one of those information sets - what does "+ 2 secs and 30 kg" mean?
2) post the two different routines so that we can better understand the differences.

Thanks


jto


Sep 7, 2006, 7:46 PM
Post #121 of 138 (23987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1) this was just the clarification of how much improvement happened. everyone could count them but I just wrote it down.

2) the CD-routine workout was usually like this (weights just for the sake of illustration):
4 sets, each 6x10secs @ 40 kgs/ 10 sec pauses after each 10 sec rep
3 sets, each 5x10secs @ 50 kgs/ 10 sec pauses after each 10 sec rep
3 sets, each 4x10secs @ 60 kgs/ 10 sec pauses after each 10 sec rep

usually the last rep was failed around 5-8 secs.

the AB-routine varied a lot. the main idea was just to do more or heavier than the last time. an example workout (weights just for the sake of illustration):
2 sets, each 6x10secs @ 40 kgs/ 10 sec pauses after each 10 sec rep
2 sets, each 8x8secs @ 70 kgs/ 10 sec pauses after each 8 sec rep
3 sets, each 12x5secs @ 90 kgs/ 10 sec pauses after each 5 sec rep
2 sets, each 6x10secs @ 50 kgs/ 5 sec pauses after each 10 sec rep
1 set, each 4x15secs @ 40 kgs/ 5 sec pauses after each 15 sec rep

so the rep length and amount varied much more than in the CD-routine. this is really nothing special as I have written before. normal weightlifting really.

as also written before there is NO NEED for doing every set to the failure. you can end your set just before. the amount of weight is more relevant. this way you can also train more often and not overwork your central nervous system.

all the muscle cells are working after you use about 60% weight of your one rep max. the firing rate of the motor units is the more meaningful thing when using heavier weights. so using the fingerboard no cells are really resting as mike wrote.


adklimber


Sep 7, 2006, 9:25 PM
Post #122 of 138 (23987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I am interested in everyone who tried rockprodigy's program and what their results were. I'll start the spray (not sure how else to show improvement). My focus is bouldering so I mixed up the PE phase a bit.

Before: 4 V4 sends

After: 5 more V4's, 5 V5's, 1 V6


lemon_boy


Sep 7, 2006, 10:56 PM
Post #123 of 138 (23987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jto (and others),

here is a copy of my proposed plan for this fall (tues and thurs nights). my difficulty lies in the fact that i want to be sure to hit all of the hand positions, but it eats an enormous amout of time. the schedule below is exactly 2 hours, if i rest 2 minutes between all of the main workout sets. Can you give me some advice on which positions i should alter rep length, etc for? thanks!

10 x 10 x 6 means 10 sec on, 10 sec off, 6 reps

Warmup
ARC 10 x 10 - 5 min, Jugs, Slopers, 1E(3)
ARC 20 x 10 - 5 min, Jugs, Slopers, 1E(3)
ARC 10 x 10 - 5 min Slopers, 1E(3)
ARC 20 x 10 - 5 min, Jugs, Slopers, 1E(3)
ARC 10 x 10 - 5 min 2" Pinch
ARC 10 x 10 - 5 min 4" Pinch

Main
10 x 10 x 6, 1E(3)
10 x 10 x 6, 2E(3)
10 x 10 x 6, 3E(3)
10 x 10 x 6, 1P(1,2)
10 x 10 x 6, 1P(2,3)
10 x 10 x 6, 1P(3,4)
10 x 10 x 6, 2" Pinch
10 x 10 x 6, 4" Pinch
10 x 10 x 6, tight ringlocks
10 x 10 x 6, loose ringlocks

5 x 5 x 6, 1E(3)
5 x 5 x 6, 2E(3)
5 x 5 x 6, 3E(3)
5 x 5 x 6, 1P(1,2)
5 x 5 x 6, 1P(2,3)
5 x 5 x 6, 1P(3,4)
5 x 5 x 6, 2" Pinch
5 x 5 x 6, 4" Pinch
5 x 5 x 6, tight ringlocks
5 x 5 x 6, loose ringlocks

Cool Down
ARC 10/10 - 5 min 2" Pinch (10 on 10 off)
ARC 10/10 - 5 min 4" Pinch (10 on 10 off)
ARC 10/10 - 5 min tight ringlocks (10 on 10 off)
ARC 10/10 - 5 min loose ringlocks (10 on 10 off)


jto


Sep 8, 2006, 4:55 AM
Post #124 of 138 (23987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Even if promoted on some sites I myself don´t believe in useing every possible hand position in a hangboard workout. When doing a bouldering workout it´s different and those should be your main training stuff anyway. My suggested grips:

- Round whole hand sloper
- Openhand edge (pocket) with three fingers if your pinkie is as short as mine :)
- Half crimp (without the thumb)
- Pinch Wide and narrow

If you´re doing hangboards two to three times a week you could do 2-5 sets per grip position and alter the set and rep lengths as written down above in the AB-routine. Also if your climbing is very crimpy, do a lot of other grips during your hangboarding and leave crimping aside for a while.

Here is my latest hangboard workout after an hour of progressive bouldering (a lot of slopers and pinches):

Openhand three finger pocket:
1st set: 6x10 secs @ 20 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 10 sec reps
2nd set: 7x5 secs @ 30 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps
3rd set: 9x5 secs @ 40 kgs / 10 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps

Half crimp without the thumb:
4th set: 7x5 secs @ 30 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps
5th set: 5x10 secs @ 20 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 10 sec reps
6th set: 12x5 secs @ 40 kgs / 10 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps
7th set: 3x15 secs @ 15 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 15 sec reps

all the sets were ended a bit before failure (failing to get the rep time) except the sets 3, 6 and 7.


lemon_boy


Sep 8, 2006, 2:46 PM
Post #125 of 138 (23987 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks for the input jto. i am revising my schedule as we speak. the different number of grip positions has had a grip on me, so to speak. i generally climb at 4 types of areas - granite cracks, desert cracks, vertical limestone w/ pockets and crimps, and eldo. beween the 4 of these, i sometimes notice that i feel strong is some grip positions but weak in others. particularly the big edge versus the small edge.

my revised schedule will try to eliminate some of the grips, and then add one more set with different hang times and rep numbers.

one more quick question, do you think the order is important. for example, would it be better to do three sets of one grip position and move to 3 sets of the next grip. or, do each group of a certain hang time and rep length for all of the grips, and then move on to the next group?


lemon_boy


Sep 8, 2006, 3:40 PM
Post #126 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jto,

it looks like your most 'powerful' sets have the highest number of reps and your most 'enduro' sets have the lowest number of reps. (i concluded this by putting the hang time, rest time, and rep count into excel and sorting). i sorted based first on shortest hang time, then based on longest rest time, and then least number of reps. the results are very interesting to me. i had always equated power with fewest reps and endurance with most reps. can you elaborate on this some? is it a method of equalizing the volume somewhat between power, mid, and enduro?

hang rest reps
5 10 9 (power)
5 10 12 (power)
5 5 7 (mid power)
5 5 7 (mid power)
10 5 5 (mid enduro)
10 5 6 (mid enduro)
15 5 3 (enduro)


adklimber


Sep 8, 2006, 5:35 PM
Post #127 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

jto said:
In reply to:
Even if promoted on some sites I myself don´t believe in useing every possible hand position in a hangboard workout. When doing a bouldering workout it´s different and those should be your main training stuff anyway.

jto,

I am interested in why you would use less grip positions than more; wouldn't the more grips you have, vary the workout even more? Isn't the variety within the session the key?


lemon_boy


Sep 8, 2006, 7:22 PM
Post #128 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 12, 2002
Posts: 287

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

and here it is folks,
straight from the parish of saint alphonso

Warmup
ARC 20 x 10 x 10min, Jugs, Slopers, 1E(3) alternating
ARC 20 x 10 x 10min 2" Pinch
ARC 20 x 10 x 10min 4" Pinch

Main (1 min rests)
[hang time x rest x reps, grip position]
15 x 5 x 3, 1E(3)
5 x 5 x 6, 1E(3)
5 x 10 x 12, 1E(3)
15 x 5 x 3, 3E(3)
5 x 5 x 6, 3E(3)
5 x 10 x 12, 3E(3)
15 x 5 x 3, 1P(3,4)
5 x 5 x 6, 1P(3,4)
5 x 10 x 12, 1P(3,4)
15 x 5 x 3, 2" Pinch
5 x 5 x 6, 2" Pinch
5 x 10 x 12, 2" Pinch
15 x 5 x 3, 4" Pinch
5 x 5 x 6, 4" Pinch
5 x 10 x 12, 4" Pinch
15 x 5 x 3, Tight Ringlocks
5 x 5 x 6, Tight Ringlocks
5 x 10 x 12, Tight Ringlocks
15 x 5 x 3, Loose Ringlocks
5 x 5 x 6, Loose Ringlocks
5 x 10 x 12, Loose Ringlocks


Cool Down
ARC 20 x 10 x 5min 2" Pinch
ARC 20 x 10 x 5min 4" Pinch
ARC 20 x 10 x 5min tight ringlocks
ARC 20 x 10 x 5min loose ringlocks


rockprodigy


Sep 8, 2006, 11:57 PM
Post #129 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets the blender [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sorry about not getting back to you on that.

Here's what I did last winter to vary my hangboard training:

(# reps) x (rep length in seconds) w/(rest duration in seconds)

1-5: For each of the seven grip positions: 7x7 w/3, 6x7 w/3, 5x7 w/3
6: For each of the seven grip positions: 5x7 w/3, 5x7 w/3, 4x7 w/3, 4x7 w/3
7: For each of the seven grip positions: 7x7 w/3, 7x6 w/4, 6x5 w/5, 6x5 w/5
8: For each of the seven grip positions: 7x7 w/3, 6x7 w/3, 5x7 w/3
9: For each of the seven grip positions: 6x5 w/5, 5x5 w/5

I don't have any real great reasoning for how I picked these combinations, except that I was trying to increase volume in weeks 6, and 7, then tapering off the volume and increasing intensity in 8 and 9. I'm defining volume as (# reps)x(rep length), so for week 1, it would be: 7x7 + 6x7 + 5x7 = 126

Next season I'm going to try to plan it out so I have a steady increase in volume throughout the phase. Perhaps something like:

1: 5x10, 5x7................(85)
2: 7x7, 6x7..................(91)
3: 7x5, 6x6, 5x7.........(100)
4: 7x7, 6x6, 5x5.........(110)
5: 7x9, 7x8................(119)
6: 7x7, 6x7, 5x7.........(126)
7: 7x5, 7x5, 7x5, 7x5..(140)
8: 7x7, 7x6, 6x5, 6x5..(151)
9: 7x7, 6x7, 5x7.........(126)
10: 6x7, 5x5, 5x5......... (92)

Snap!


jto


Sep 9, 2006, 8:48 AM
Post #130 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockprodigy:
the plan seems good. I think the variation in the rep length should produce good gains. anyway I would move between 2 and 15 sec reps as the difference between 5 and 7 secs is not really that much. I would still keep the 5-10 sec range as the main rep length.

it would be certain that your 10-15 sec max result gets better if your 2-5 sec maxes go up. in this time frame the heavier weights also build up endurance.

I also think it would be very beneficial to forget the excact weight used and too much strict planning anyway. it really doesn´t matter that much. one could just choose a weigth and see how it goes. here is a very simplified example for one workout ( or grip position) using only one weight (after warm ups):
1st set: 8x3 secs @ 60 lbs / 7 sec pauses after every rep
2nd set:5x5 secs @ 60 lbs / 5 sec pauses after every rep
3rd set: 3x7 secs @ 60 lbs / 3 sec pauses after every rep

so doing shorter reps concentrates more on maximum strength and longer reps more on the strength endurance end. it is not at all so important how one workout is structured. much more important is the long term ( let´s say 2 months) development.

a starting set could be:
5x5 secs @ 50 lbs / 10 sec pauses after every rep

and after the strength and power phase one could end here:
10x5 secs @ 80 lbs / 5 sec pauses after every rep

if the rest time is kept at 10 secs the weights used would be much bigger. this is just an example and just to show that there´s no need to set too strict plans of how much one should do within the phase. if the strength is there, use it.


lemon boy:
the number of reps in the shorter (5 sec) rep sets is set more towards basic strength than actual power. if I would enphasize power I would try to do maybe a following set:
3-6x2 secs @ X weight/ 8 sec rests

the number of reps is not so important in this kind of system compared to the rep length and the pauses between the reps. it´s not comparable with weightlifting in that sense. I use this rep system to get more volume compared to straight sets with max hang time (an example: max 12 secs @ 60 lbs and that´s it for that set).


adklimber:
yes the variation is the key but more within the certain grip type. I think it´s better to concentrate on the main grips as they are the most used in climbing and that said need the most work. the same in weightlifting; it´s not so beneficial to train many different excercises compared to few good ones. the neural effect is better when concentrating on fewer positions.

anyway I don´t see a problem doing let´s say 10 different grips in a workout. it could be a very good idea to mix around simple workouts containing 1-3 grip types with varied ones containing very much different grip positions. in the simple workout there would be more sets per grip and in the varied one less off course.


spudster11


Sep 10, 2006, 11:26 PM
Post #131 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 22, 2004
Posts: 11

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets the blender [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Rockprodigy, are you now proposing 10 weeks for hypertrophy vs 6 weeks in your training program article?


rockprodigy


Sep 11, 2006, 12:30 AM
Post #132 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2002
Posts: 1540

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

No, those are workouts, not weeks. I usually do 2 workouts a week, unless I'm climbing outside a lot, then maybe only one a week, but I average 8-10 workouts in about a six week period.

Wow, that's a run-on sentence!


adklimber


Sep 14, 2006, 3:50 PM
Post #133 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

JTO said:

In reply to:
Openhand three finger pocket:
1st set: 6x10 secs @ 20 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 10 sec reps
2nd set: 7x5 secs @ 30 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps
3rd set: 9x5 secs @ 40 kgs / 10 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps

Half crimp without the thumb:
4th set: 7x5 secs @ 30 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps
5th set: 5x10 secs @ 20 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 10 sec reps
6th set: 12x5 secs @ 40 kgs / 10 sec pauses between every 5 sec reps
7th set: 3x15 secs @ 15 kgs / 5 sec pauses between every 15 sec reps

all the sets were ended a bit before failure (failing to get the rep time) except the sets 3, 6 and 7.

I am somewhat confused with the not ending before failure thing. I did this work out last night, and it was good, but I am not sure how hard I should push myself. My mentality has always been to go until I can't go anymore; now that is thrown away, but I am still not sure what it should look like.

What about the rest period between sets? 2 minutes, 3, 4, etc?

Also, should my focus be to increase the weight with each training period? I guess what I am struggling with is the whole philosophy of this training. It seems to contradict everything I have ever done.


jto


Sep 15, 2006, 5:02 AM
Post #134 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2004
Posts: 272

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

yes, training to failure is not needed. more important is the progression in
- weights used
- hanging longer time with a certain weight
- doing more reps with the certain weight
- using a smaller grip for the same grip position for the same (or more) weight

when leaving a bit for the next time you can train more often without trashing your nervous system. so as long as you´re doing some or all of the above you don´t have to worry about going to failure. the stimulation is quite enough. vary the grip order and do your weakest grip first.

the rest time between the sets depends of what you´re training for. more weight and short hang times require a bit longer and vice versa. if you need a fixed rest time, I woudl suggest three minutes but this is not so relevant really. start the next set when you feel like you´ve had enough rest. when training for strength endurance the rest times are more critical.


adklimber


Sep 15, 2006, 4:51 PM
Post #135 of 138 (22912 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 27, 2006
Posts: 110

Re: 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

JTO,

Thanks for the response. I am excited to test this out. I love the quick recovery time this gives me, I climb quite a bit, but I need to work on my crimp strength.

Is your focus on hanging alone for your training, or do you also do a periodization program similiar to rockprodigy's, where the campus board is used (if you don't personnally do it, do you recommend it?)?

My training goes into bouldering (even though I do quite a bit of trad). Should I keep the rep length around 3-5 sec and not bother with more time?


b12yan88


Nov 25, 2006, 10:40 AM
Post #136 of 138 (6276 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 17, 2006
Posts: 7

Re: [rockprodigy] 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The link to the training guide doesn't work anymore. Could you post it up again ?


mercphony


Nov 25, 2006, 6:00 PM
Post #137 of 138 (6241 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 24

Re: [b12yan88] 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I beleive this is what you are looking for:

http://www.rockclimbing.com/...ockprodigy__258.html

enjoy


(This post was edited by mercphony on Nov 25, 2006, 6:01 PM)


b12yan88


Nov 25, 2006, 6:24 PM
Post #138 of 138 (6236 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 17, 2006
Posts: 7

Re: [mercphony] 'rockprodigy's' Training Program meets CFit [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

thanks


Forums : Climbing Information : Technique & Training

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook