|
andrewj
Jul 1, 2006, 12:21 AM
Post #1 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 6, 2005
Posts: 29
|
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320002559206&ru=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.ebay.com%3A80%2Fsearch%2Fsearch.dll%3Ffrom%3DR40%26satitle%3D320002559206%26fvi%3D1 So does anyone know if BD's patent has expired on the Camalot? Looks to me as if some Ukranians are trying (but not too hard) to slip by under BD's radar. I especially like the fact that there are machine nuts on the ends of the axles and they give you the lengths of the different sizes of cams, not their range of camming. classy. not to mention safe. -now edited for your viewing satisfaction-
|
|
|
|
|
veganboyjosh
Jul 1, 2006, 12:38 AM
Post #2 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2003
Posts: 1421
|
word.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Jul 1, 2006, 2:19 AM
Post #3 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
I had seen that earlier. Type "Camalot", in E-Bay you'll see these things show up. Clearly they are in violation of US law in calling them "Camalots" .....twice. I did buy a nut tool from them and it is a great tool which arrived quickly, but BD should contact ebay and shut that use of their trademark down IMO. Copied verbatium: "Set of 4 Camalot Camalots cam Climbing Protection NR !!" Set of 4 KROK Camalot Camalots cam Climbing Protection NR !!" "http://www.porcelain.com.ua/...ds2axis/2N1234-3.JPG "#4 KROK Brand New MADE IN UKRAINE Device Weight 297 g. Dimensions is: 215 mm. long ------------------------------------------------ We are representatives of the KROK manufactures trade mark at ebay. We are searching a wholesale buyers and ready to cooperation. We have a whole range of climbing equipment. All climbing equipment we sell is tested and have appropriate documents from the Ukrainian government and testing organizations. ------------------------------------------------ PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK US ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ------------------------------------------------ Worldwide shipping $21 takes 7-14 days by Air. Payment by Visa/MasterCard - fastest way. Money Orders, Cheques - need some time to be cleared by our bank." Link (which may not work later) http://cgi.ebay.com/...QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
|
|
|
|
|
zakr
Jul 1, 2006, 2:42 AM
Post #4 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 40
|
Wow. Im not even mad, im impressed... The nylock nuts on the end of the axles is the second best part, the fact that the silver peice of metal behind the nuts on the blue cam on wrong is the best part. How do patents work in different countries???? Zak
|
|
|
|
|
scrapedape
Jul 1, 2006, 2:43 AM
Post #5 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 2392
|
In reply to: All climbing equipment we sell is tested and have appropriate documents from the Ukrainian government and testing organizations. Fuck yeah. Good enough for me. 8^)
|
|
|
|
|
redlegrangerone
Jul 1, 2006, 2:56 AM
Post #6 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 851
|
The sad thing is people are bidding on these.
|
|
|
|
|
scrapedape
Jul 1, 2006, 3:01 AM
Post #7 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 2392
|
In reply to: The sad thing is people are bidding on these. Actually, as of now, no one is. I find that reassuring.
|
|
|
|
|
redlegrangerone
Jul 1, 2006, 3:07 AM
Post #8 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 851
|
There was a bid of $100 a couple of days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Jul 1, 2006, 4:00 AM
Post #9 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
Look at the curve of the cams. Now it might just be a photo distortion but I don't think so. Those babies don't have the same cam angle as a camalot. It's my guess that the BD cam angle is pretty much optimum for 2 axles, therefore, these things either won't hold as well or have crap for range. I'm not worried at the machine nuts. I know of a machinist who built a larger than average replica of a camalot. It had machine nuts for axles too. I'm not going to say what it pull tested at, but lets just say your rope would liquefy before his cam would fail. Of course are these jokers half as good at this sort of thing as the guy I just mentioned? Looking at the finish of these cams, not even close. The part that I find odd is that this company could have ripped anything metal off in the world and sold it on ebay, why do you suppose they chose such a low demand item as climbing gear?
|
|
|
|
|
csgambill
Jul 1, 2006, 4:21 AM
Post #10 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 3, 2004
Posts: 607
|
I've seen these before too. I call them the Krok of Shit. Despite the functionality of machine nuts those things look scary, all spraypainted and hammered together. Maybe they're even made out of steel plate some dude had in his basement, or better yet from landmines the guy found in his backyard. edit: These other cams he's selling are even better: http://www.porcelain.com.ua/...dsRope/RN12345-1.JPG
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Jul 1, 2006, 4:49 AM
Post #11 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
Look at the cam angles. I'm no mathemetician but he's got that shit wrong. And look where he drilled the axle. I really do like the shrink wrap over the swages, I wish everyone would do that (seriously, it would kick ass).
|
|
|
|
|
corpse
Jul 1, 2006, 5:29 AM
Post #12 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 17, 2003
Posts: 822
|
In reply to: I really do like the shrink wrap over the swages, I wish everyone would do that (seriously, it would kick ass). They probably do it to hide the rusting paper clip that's holding the wire together :-P
|
|
|
|
|
renohandjams
Jul 1, 2006, 6:52 AM
Post #13 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2005
Posts: 616
|
Wow, and I thought Pika cams were scary. I usually trust most cams, but I want to see strength test, etc.. It would be interesting if someone actually bought a set of some of those homemade cams and tested them. I wonder where they would fail, do they even have ratings? I'm sure Ray Jardine's very first cams were probably just as scary too. +I'm pretty sure the camalot patent expired, I heard that's why Trango waited to released the max cam because eventhough it was their unique design it did come close to the BD idea so they waited until the patent expired so they wouldn't have any legal problems releasing the new line, that's what I heard from the Trango booth during the OR show 2 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
billy
Jul 1, 2006, 8:48 AM
Post #14 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 13
|
I like the notches in the cams, they look like a hacksaw was used to make them.
|
|
|
|
|
sausalito
Jul 1, 2006, 12:40 PM
Post #16 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 155
|
the metal plate on the blue cam being upside down is shady as hell. That pretty much means their QC is sh1t. If I had to put money on it though I would bet they would hold a whipper. If I had to put my life on it there is no way in hell...... I may see if I cant get some cheap and test them out. I am also interested in taking one apart to see whats up. For all the shadiness in off market cams, cams simply are not rocket science so mabey these guys are on to something.... for crying out loud though make sure the cams in the photo are properly put together.
|
|
|
|
|
tattooed_climber
Jul 1, 2006, 7:50 PM
Post #17 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 4838
|
i love how the wire is swagged around the axle on those other cch-like cams
|
|
|
|
|
weasel
Jul 2, 2006, 2:34 AM
Post #18 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 2, 2003
Posts: 136
|
I'd like to see the faces of the climbers who some gumby shows his new set of "camalots" to. "They were really cheap on ebay! Black Diamond is a Ukrainian company right?" *snicker* I think I'm going to buy one of these things and test it. They can't be too much money.
|
|
|
|
|
musicman
Jul 2, 2006, 5:04 AM
Post #19 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 16, 2004
Posts: 828
|
In reply to: the metal plate on the blue cam being upside down is shady as hell. my thoughts exactly, that's just plain scary that they (manufacturer) didn't notice
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Jul 2, 2006, 6:23 AM
Post #20 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
Give it few more years, China will kill every climbing Mfg here just watch. Here, at least I trust Russian Cams but making cams out of recycling metal made in CHINA ..! Patent is good for 17 years, you may renew it again but after that, it becomes public, in fact it was public long time ago, you are lucky that ASIANs are not in too climbing otherwise, they dump the GEAR in WAL MART for $6.99 and then buy the rope in HOME DEPOT for $14 on a 60 meter. EUROPEAN and AMERICAN made their money for long long time, its time for others to get in to this business and bring the price down so the dirt BAG could buy more gears for less money.
|
|
|
|
|
spydrmnrlz
Aug 11, 2006, 2:17 AM
Post #21 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 2
|
I found a site that actually sells them retail, so maybe they're not made in someones basement. http://www.magic-lamp.com.md/trades_eng.html
|
|
|
|
|
spydrmnrlz
Aug 11, 2006, 2:18 AM
Post #22 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 11, 2006
Posts: 2
|
I found a site that actually sells them retail, so maybe they're not made in someone's basement. http://www.magic-lamp.com.md/trades_eng.html
|
|
|
|
|
redlegrangerone
Aug 11, 2006, 3:06 PM
Post #24 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 851
|
I think I will wait until the spiderman above tests them for me.
|
|
|
|
|
dbrayack
Aug 11, 2006, 3:16 PM
Post #25 of 35
(5756 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 1260
|
I wonder if they have a web site where they're selling them :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
plaa
Aug 16, 2006, 10:12 PM
Post #26 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 3
|
ukrainian climbing gear web site now available www.PetrenkoWorld.com :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
sed
Aug 16, 2006, 10:28 PM
Post #27 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 3, 2003
Posts: 356
|
The cam patent may be in the U.S only and so if they don't have an international patent other countries can make and sell from their location.
|
|
|
|
|
robsknot
Oct 30, 2006, 2:46 PM
Post #28 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 18
|
Right guys, I have purchased a complete set of one and two cams friends from these guys with the sole intention of testing them to destruction... I will test them against my existing cams and write a post script in a few weeks time. If they dont stand up to some bench testing and live testing then you will hear from me whilst my injuries are healing.... :lol: The following is a rough translation of their testing and the test benches on which the tests were conducted. I am no engineer, so can any one who has give us an input? Start The original documents about KN rates for climbing cams is on russian language, manufacturer of climbing equipment KROK still not translate it to english or any other language so I am try my best to translate it for you... If you need i can send you scanned images of testing certificates, but again - all original documents language is russian. Also if you will need the originals of the testing certificates i will be able to send all requested documents by the registered mail. --- This flexible friends (Links cams, 1axle cams & 2 axle cams) has been tested at Scientific - Certification centre "STANDART" at the capital of Ukraine - Kiev city. Date of testing is 24 May 2006. Results of toughness tests. Testing equipment is - testing machine ZD-40. Testing methodic - stepped static loading (5 kN step) with speed 5 millimeters per minute, then wait 1 minute at the reached loading level with next unloading and testing item working abilities. loading results 5 kN without any damages, item working 100% 10 kN without any damages, item working 100% 15 kN without any damages, item working 100% 17-18 kN pulling link damage, other mechanism without any damage --- Thie Stoppers (Nuts) has been tested at Scientific - Certification centre "STANDART" at the capital of Ukraine - Kiev city. Date of testing is 24 February 2006. Results of toughness tests. Testing equipment is - testing machine INSTRON-1126. Testing methodic - static loading with speed 5 millimeters per minute until unit will be damaged. # of stopper, Link damage link diameter kN 0 (1,8) 5,7 - 5,8 1 (2,0) 6,0 - 6,2 2 (2,4) 7,8 - 7,9 3 (3,0) 9,4 - 9,4 4 (3,2) 12,6 -13,2 5 (3,2) 13,1 -13,5 6 (3,2) 13,0 -13,5 7 (3,2) 12,8 -13,2 8 (3,2) 13,0 -13,4 Always link has been damaged, the stopper body without any damage. --- So above is my translation of the testing certificates. Please feel free to contact us if i am can help you more or you will have any more questions. THank you, End I will ask for a copy of the teats certs in Russian and ask a mate to translate them when I return to UK in a couple of weeks. Regards Rob
|
|
|
|
|
brent_e
Oct 30, 2006, 4:15 PM
Post #29 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 5111
|
Awesome of you to do that, Rob!! I personally won't be buying any of those cams but your tests will be interesting! Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
robsknot
Oct 30, 2006, 5:26 PM
Post #30 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 18
|
Hey, they might be ok....lol a bit like the Russian T62 compared to a Abrehams. Am sure the T62 would be awsom against poorly armed peasents, but against the Abrehams .........it sucks . Will be fun trying to break them......cant wait to get back and devise some testing plans...... :twisted:
|
|
|
|
|
redlegrangerone
Oct 30, 2006, 6:27 PM
Post #31 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 851
|
But the T62 was a decent match for the M60 tanks we had then. And there were a lot more of them to swarm you under.
|
|
|
|
|
robsknot
Oct 30, 2006, 8:42 PM
Post #32 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 18
|
Cheers geeze, You are right and I must prostrate myself before you and humble myself to your superior knowledge.....but as far as the analogy is concerned? i think it worked lol Any how, I will throw myself and any one else i can get as a crash test dummy, onto loading these little gems....and who knows...... As it stands now, the RPG or the explosively formed projectile IED (what a fucking bluff classification by some half whit in the ROC office.... Shaped IED would do) is perfectly capable of disableing any advanced armoured vehicle.... BUGGER THEY ARE ON TO US....... shhhhhhhh
|
|
|
|
|
robsknot
Oct 31, 2006, 4:36 AM
Post #33 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 18
|
Cheers geeze, You are right and I must prostrate myself before you and humble myself to your superior knowledge.....but as far as the analogy is concerned? i think it worked lol Any how, I will throw myself and any one else i can get as a crash test dummy, onto loading these little gems....and who knows...... As it stands now, the RPG or the explosively formed projectile IED (what a fucking bluff classification by some half whit in the ROC office.... Shaped IED would do) is perfectly capable of disableing any advanced armoured vehicle.... BUGGER THEY ARE ON TO US....... shhhhhhhh
|
|
|
|
|
robsknot
Nov 2, 2006, 9:27 AM
Post #34 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 18
|
Can any one suggest any interesting tests that i could perform on these little babies? Within the bounds of reasonable safety I will do most shit...... Ideas will be appreciated....... :shock:
|
|
|
|
|
col
Nov 2, 2006, 10:06 AM
Post #35 of 35
(4615 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 232
|
What about if you whack it in a crack somewhere you can take a nice controled fall (with a second backup rope for when it blows...) and put a screamer on it. As they have state forces they rip out at, it should give you an idea of it's strenght..... Infact, you could use a "non human" weight instead of yourself if it made you feel better
|
|
|
|
|
|