Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Sport Climbing:
Downgrading, Upgrading?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Sport Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


GabeWalker


Sep 22, 2007, 9:56 PM
Post #1 of 42 (8140 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 70

Downgrading, Upgrading?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Hey everyone. I am wondering if it is possible to upgrade routes? I keep seeing all these routes downgraded, and I wonder if it is the same the other way around. There is a route I climbed outside that says it is a 5.10-, and I think it is at least a 5.11b or 5.11c. I talked to a guy that was there and he said it is definitely stiff for the grade.


shu


Sep 22, 2007, 10:04 PM
Post #2 of 42 (8128 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 29, 2004
Posts: 44

Re: [GabeWalker] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's definitely acceptable, and even encouraged to upgrade routes.

The first step is to notify the guidebook author that he rated the route wrong, and suggest your new rating.

If you are unsure whether it's 11b or 11c, just round up. It makes everyone feel better.

The climbing community is very lucky to have climbing gyms, it is a place where we can go and become familiar with ratings so that we can then go outside and fix all the wildly varying outside ratings.

If that 5.10- feels harder than the blue 5.11b proj you're working in the gym, the rating must be wrong, and it is your duty to the climbing community to upgrade it.


Carnage


Sep 22, 2007, 10:33 PM
Post #3 of 42 (8115 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 27, 2007
Posts: 923

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

just cause its in a gym, it doesnt mean that its right

the gym i climb at rates stiff. i know one of the route setters he has blatantly said that certain routes were rated hard for various reasons.

i think the best way to determine the grade is climb other 11b's and c's in the area, along with some high 10's. see what the other stuff feels like, and make your rating suggestion based about the routes at that crag. consistency at the crag is more important than consistency with other places, especially at the gym.

also, since its rated 10-, i think you'd be better suggesting a 11- or 11 rating on it, since they don't appear to be using the a/b/c/d thing


a.frosch


Sep 22, 2007, 10:35 PM
Post #4 of 42 (8109 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 15, 2007
Posts: 69

Re: [GabeWalker] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

GabeWalker wrote:
Hey everyone. I am wondering if it is possible to upgrade routes? I keep seeing all these routes downgraded, and I wonder if it is the same the other way around. There is a route I climbed outside that says it is a 5.10-, and I think it is at least a 5.11b or 5.11c. I talked to a guy that was there and he said it is definitely stiff for the grade.

As someone who claims to have climbed the north face of the eiger and the abruzzi ridge on K2, I wouldn't think you would need to ask this question.

Any luck getting recognition for your badass 11a toprope ascent? I seem to remember a thread to that effect...


shu


Sep 22, 2007, 11:04 PM
Post #5 of 42 (8089 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 29, 2004
Posts: 44

Re: [Carnage] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Carnage wrote:
just cause its in a gym, it doesnt mean that its right


God invented gyms to settle rating disputes!


Seriously though, why should we trust ratings from an uncontrolled environment (outside), when we can compare everything to ratings from a controlled environment (the gym).

In the highest levels of climbing there is public and professional scrutiny regarding grades. Why then should the rest of us be left to govern ourselves and make up our own ratings?

Gyms have professionals who set routes in a controlled environment and who rate climbs as a career. Why would we not trust their judgement? Are YOU a professional climber or rater? Why then should we, as non professional climbers have the responsibility of rating routes THRUST upon us?

We should not as a community trust the ratings of non-professional "weekend warrior" climbers. We should rather embrace the ratings that professional gym route-setters give, and use their wisdom to aid in rating outside climbs.


112


Sep 22, 2007, 11:07 PM
Post #6 of 42 (8082 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 15, 2004
Posts: 432

Re: [GabeWalker] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

GabeWalker wrote:
Hey everyone.

Hey Gabe!

In reply to:
There is a route I climbed outside that says it is a 5.10-, and I think it is at least a 5.11b or 5.11c. I talked to a guy that was there and he said it is definitely stiff for the grade.

Sounds like you should down graded it to a 9+.


wildthing14


Sep 22, 2007, 11:19 PM
Post #7 of 42 (8071 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 50

Re: [112] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ouchLaugh


N_Oo_B


Sep 23, 2007, 1:40 AM
Post #8 of 42 (8001 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 463

Re: [Carnage] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Carnage wrote:
just cause its in a gym, it doesnt mean that its right


i think the best way to determine the grade is climb other 11b's and c's in the area, along with some high 10's. see what the other stuff feels like, and make your rating suggestion based about the routes at that crag. consistency at the crag is more important


At least 1 person posted an answer worth reading.


EPiCJAMES


Sep 23, 2007, 2:59 AM
Post #9 of 42 (7978 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2007
Posts: 391

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
Carnage wrote:
just cause its in a gym, it doesnt mean that its right



Seriously though, why should we trust ratings from an uncontrolled environment (outside), when we can compare everything to ratings from a controlled environment (the gym).

ratings are going to be different from person to person. doesnt matter if you're indoor, outdoor. don't waste your time worrying if its a 5.10 or a 5.11 you just sent. just climb it for the climb.


nuts_bolts


Sep 23, 2007, 4:08 AM
Post #10 of 42 (7962 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 5, 2006
Posts: 88

Re: [Carnage] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Carnage wrote:
just cause its in a gym, it doesnt mean that its right

the gym i climb at rates stiff. i know one of the route setters he has blatantly said that certain routes were rated hard for various reasons.

Hook... *here it comes*

Carnage wrote:
i think the best way to determine the grade is climb other 11b's and c's in the area, along with some high 10's. see what the other stuff feels like, and make your rating suggestion based about the routes at that crag. consistency at the crag is more important than consistency with other places, especially at the gym.

...line... *waits for it*

Carnage wrote:
also, since its rated 10-, i think you'd be better suggesting a 11- or 11 rating on it, since they don't appear to be using the a/b/c/d thing

AND SINKER!


bent_gate


Sep 23, 2007, 6:51 AM
Post #11 of 42 (7922 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2620

Re: [GabeWalker] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gabe is back!




Valarc


Sep 23, 2007, 2:47 PM
Post #12 of 42 (7851 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
God invented gyms to settle rating disputes!

....

Gyms have professionals who set routes in a controlled environment and who rate climbs as a career. Why would we not trust their judgement? Are YOU a professional climber or rater? Why then should we, as non professional climbers have the responsibility of rating routes THRUST upon us?


Even if a routesetter is the most skilled, artistic setter in the world, with amazing routes, a gym route is not a rock route, and you could have an amazingly good setter who doesn't know dick about real rock. However, most setters are far from this ideal.

If even a small majority of gym routesetters were true professional climbers, this argument might hold some water. Sadly, many gym setters are high school gymbies who learned everything they know about grades from climbing on plastic routes set by high school gymbies. In my case I'm a college gymbie who learned all of my setting by climbing on routes set by college gymbies - I set some damn fun routes, but I'm not naive or arrogant enough to think my ratings have anything other than a passing resemblance to ratings on real rock. In fact, I purposely sandbag my ratings just a little bit, to try to compensate for the inherent difficulty that comes in figuring out a sequence on real rock where the holds aren't brightly colored and taped.

I enjoy gym climbing a lot, and I enjoy setting quite a bit too, but don't delude yourself into thinking it has anything to do with what happens on real rock. Go watch some 5.12 gym climbers get on real rock for the first time if you don't believe me. If we let gym-trained climbers decide the grades, 5.9s would be called 5.12s because someone couldn't figure out where the holds are.

The ONLY way one is going to accurately grade rock is by climbing rock - and a whole shitload of it. Even then, it's always going to be subjective, and that's the nature of the beast. Instead of trying to force some strict training with plastic routes onto it, chill out and don't worry about grades so much.

PS - You've been trolled, and I very well might have as well.


mturner


Sep 23, 2007, 4:54 PM
Post #13 of 42 (7810 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [Valarc] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Valarc wrote:
PS - You've been trolled, and I very well might have as well.

You can't write an over-zealous three paragraph reply to a troll and then say the troller has been trolled. That's gotta be breaking some kind of troll etiquette.


Valarc


Sep 23, 2007, 10:24 PM
Post #14 of 42 (7756 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 1473

Re: [mturner] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Sorry, didn't mean to blow your mind there.

I think indoor climbing gets a bum rap a lot of the time, and while I was pretty sure I was getting trolled, I also didn't wanna stand by and watch that guy give indoor climbing a bad name.

It's a lot of fun, it's a source of a good workout and a creative outlet for routesetters, but it sure as hell ain't a substitute for climbing real rock.


shu


Sep 24, 2007, 12:19 AM
Post #15 of 42 (7720 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 29, 2004
Posts: 44

Re: [Valarc] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Valarc wrote:

It's a lot of fun, it's a source of a good workout and a creative outlet for routesetters, but it sure as hell ain't a substitute for climbing real rock.

Real rock isn't even DESIGNED for climbing. Plastic holds are designed ergonomically and for climbing.


Why would I want to climb anything that's not specifically designed to be climbed?

Forgot to write anything edit


(This post was edited by shu on Sep 24, 2007, 12:21 AM)


rocknice2


Sep 24, 2007, 1:02 AM
Post #16 of 42 (7692 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2006
Posts: 1221

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
Valarc wrote:

It's a lot of fun, it's a source of a good workout and a creative outlet for routesetters, but it sure as hell ain't a substitute for climbing real rock.

Real rock isn't even DESIGNED for climbing. Plastic holds are designed ergonomically and for climbing.


Why would I want to climb anything that's not specifically designed to be climbed?

Stupidest thing I've ever heard come from a rockclimber.
Oh wait a minute your a plasticlimber.

Diversity of sequences is just one quality that separates rock from plastic. On plastic you must climb the setters moves. If these are not your strong suit then the route becomes much harder than quoted. On rock there are [most of the time] intermediate holds.

Aw crap!! I just bit took bait.....wiggle,WIGGLE.....flap,FLAP.....jump HIGH out of water


mturner


Sep 24, 2007, 5:16 AM
Post #17 of 42 (7636 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [GabeWalker] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Number one way you know your troll is too easily noticeable?

All of the replies are trolls of your post.

I know, trolling is hard work...



(This post was edited by mturner on Sep 24, 2007, 5:18 AM)


lena_chita
Moderator

Sep 24, 2007, 3:33 PM
Post #18 of 42 (7577 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087

Re: [mturner] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

mturner wrote:
Number one way you know your troll is too easily noticeable?

All of the replies are trolls of your post.

I know, trolling is hard work...
[image]http://www.whoateallthepies.tv/Pre-seasonlampard.jpg[/image]

Did Gabe gain some MORE weight since the time his "cover picture" was taken? I could swear the sag used to be less pronounced...

I bet THAT's why the 5.10 route felt so hard!


jh_angel


Sep 24, 2007, 4:51 PM
Post #19 of 42 (7532 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Posts: 232

Re: [GabeWalker] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

For real. 'Round here in New England, at least for trad routes, we have 5.9 and then "New England 5.9", which can be anything from 5.10-5.12. I have nothing but respect for Henry Barber and other from that generation, but lets upgrade those things and be done with it. It's not like people are asking to retrobolt the routes *shudder*.


Uncia


Sep 24, 2007, 8:01 PM
Post #20 of 42 (7476 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 3, 2007
Posts: 54

Re: [jh_angel] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I think that new england 5.9 is just legacy from a time before climbers decided 5.10 wasn't completely confusing. We have the same thing around here.


jh_angel


Sep 25, 2007, 2:21 AM
Post #21 of 42 (7428 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 12, 2004
Posts: 232

Re: [Uncia] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Oh, I know it is, but for some reason some routes were upgraded to the "new" standards and others weren't. Not sure why.


sidepull


Sep 25, 2007, 2:35 AM
Post #22 of 42 (7416 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 11, 2001
Posts: 2335

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
Gyms have professionals who set routes in a controlled environment and who rate climbs as a career. Why would we not trust their judgement? Are YOU a professional climber or rater? Why then should we, as non professional climbers have the responsibility of rating routes THRUST upon us?

LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly
LaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSlyLaughSly




Laugh


quiteatingmysteak


Sep 25, 2007, 3:03 AM
Post #23 of 42 (7398 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
Valarc wrote:

It's a lot of fun, it's a source of a good workout and a creative outlet for routesetters, but it sure as hell ain't a substitute for climbing real rock.

Real rock isn't even DESIGNED for climbing. Plastic holds are designed ergonomically and for climbing.


Why would I want to climb anything that's not specifically designed to be climbed?

Forgot to write anything edit


FUCK YOU condescending PRICK. You dont know SHIT about real climbing. I bet if you saw a real 5.12 you would SHIT YOUR PANTS you pondscum retard. I have been climbing for almost FIVE YEARS and not ONCE have i climbed in a gym except to go bouldering, and it is NOT nearly as good! When you can climb a route like Double Cross or Robbins Crack you can start to talk shit, but until than, shut the FUCK UP.



Serioulsy its pretentious NOOBS like you that are the fucking DEATH of this sport. someday you will forget to tie in, and fall, and probably DIE or even get HURT because you are so STUPID. GRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!


And why do you argue with all the REAL climbers here?? A simple search of the people you 'pretend' to argue with show that they climb MUCH harder than you could imagine, in some of the GREATEST climbing areas on earth. When you can go do routes in West Virginia or Texas you can say you knwo what good rock quality is. Until than stick to Supertop with all the noobs and leave the real climbers the fuck alone.


bent_gate


Sep 25, 2007, 3:45 AM
Post #24 of 42 (7336 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2004
Posts: 2620

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

quiteatingmysteak wrote:
Until than stick to Supertop with all the noobs and leave the real climbers the fuck alone.


Mmmmmmmmm.... SuperTaco.....




N_Oo_B


Sep 25, 2007, 4:03 AM
Post #25 of 42 (7316 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 463

Re: [bent_gate] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

^^lol flamed.


PepsiTwist


Sep 25, 2007, 4:27 AM
Post #26 of 42 (3225 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2007
Posts: 26

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

quiteatingmysteak wrote:
shu wrote:
Valarc wrote:

It's a lot of fun, it's a source of a good workout and a creative outlet for routesetters, but it sure as hell ain't a substitute for climbing real rock.

Real rock isn't even DESIGNED for climbing. Plastic holds are designed ergonomically and for climbing.


Why would I want to climb anything that's not specifically designed to be climbed?

Forgot to write anything edit


FUCK YOU condescending PRICK. You dont know SHIT about real climbing. I bet if you saw a real 5.12 you would SHIT YOUR PANTS you pondscum retard. I have been climbing for almost FIVE YEARS and not ONCE have i climbed in a gym except to go bouldering, and it is NOT nearly as good! When you can climb a route like Double Cross or Robbins Crack you can start to talk shit, but until than, shut the FUCK UP.



Serioulsy its pretentious NOOBS like you that are the fucking DEATH of this sport. someday you will forget to tie in, and fall, and probably DIE or even get HURT because you are so STUPID. GRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!


And why do you argue with all the REAL climbers here?? A simple search of the people you 'pretend' to argue with show that they climb MUCH harder than you could imagine, in some of the GREATEST climbing areas on earth. When you can go do routes in West Virginia or Texas you can say you knwo what good rock quality is. Until than stick to Supertop with all the noobs and leave the real climbers the fuck alone.


Yeah, cause you dont look like a complete tool now. I'd like to point out that I would say you climb just as hard as the fella your flaming there, not that your ability to pull big numbers makes you any more legitimate as a climber.

Seriously, do everybody a favor and next time you feel like making a jack-ass out of yourself, give us a bit of a heads up so we can make popcorn and get comfy.


quiteatingmysteak


Sep 25, 2007, 4:32 AM
Post #27 of 42 (3215 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [PepsiTwist] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

you have FIVE posts yet NO common sense!!!!!!!!!!


N_Oo_B


Sep 25, 2007, 4:34 AM
Post #28 of 42 (3214 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 21, 2007
Posts: 463

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

take some vallium. please.

no really, and some muscle relaxers while you're at it.


shu


Sep 25, 2007, 5:55 AM
Post #29 of 42 (3174 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 29, 2004
Posts: 44

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 " When you can go do routes in West Virginia or Texas you can say you knwo what good rock quality is. Until than stick to Supertop with all the noobs and leave the real climbers the fuck alone."

My local gym is taller than anything in West Virginia and Texas put together! So STFU nOOb!


(This post was edited by shu on Sep 25, 2007, 5:56 AM)


quiteatingmysteak


Sep 25, 2007, 6:28 AM
Post #30 of 42 (3160 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
" When you can go do routes in West Virginia or Texas you can say you knwo what good rock quality is. Until than stick to Supertop with all the noobs and leave the real climbers the fuck alone.
"

My local gym is taller than anything in West Virginia and Texas put together! So STFU nOOb!
YOUR so OBSESSED with GYMS that I would think not only do you WORK at a gym (like an IDIOT) BUT you probably CLIMB at the gym, which again, you likely WORK at!


If theres one thing I hate about people working in gyms, its when they do STUPED ASUMPTIONS on a WE BISITE assuming the know WTF THEY MEAN!


TALLER THAN A REAL ROCK? Yeah right IDIOT you should look at THE GALLERY at RED ROCKS its so fucking steep you would INSTANTLY poop and pee at the same time (and smell accordingly). I heard that theres this one route like 12d that bakar free climbed thats never yet been done before!!!!


GabeWalker


Sep 25, 2007, 1:46 PM
Post #31 of 42 (3116 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 9, 2006
Posts: 70

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

"YOUR so OBSESSED with GYMS that I would think not only do you WORK at a gym (like an IDIOT) BUT you probably CLIMB at the gym, which again, you likely WORK at!
If theres one thing I hate about people working in gyms, its when they do STUPED ASUMPTIONS on a WE BISITE assuming the know WTF THEY MEAN!
TALLER THAN A REAL ROCK? Yeah right IDIOT you should look at THE GALLERY at RED ROCKS its so fucking steep you would INSTANTLY poop and pee at the same time (and smell accordingly)."


So you think it is okay for me to change the grade? You also seem pretty hard on gym climbers, don't you think it is somewhat helpful? When I talked to a rep from a big company, they said gym climbing definitely helps to get sponsors to notice you.


(This post was edited by GabeWalker on Sep 25, 2007, 1:50 PM)


knieveltech


Sep 25, 2007, 2:50 PM
Post #32 of 42 (3100 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

quiteatingmysteak wrote:
shu wrote:
" When you can go do routes in West Virginia or Texas you can say you knwo what good rock quality is. Until than stick to Supertop with all the noobs and leave the real climbers the fuck alone.
"

My local gym is taller than anything in West Virginia and Texas put together! So STFU nOOb!

YOUR so OBSESSED with GYMS that I would think not only do you WORK at a gym (like an IDIOT) BUT you probably CLIMB at the gym, which again, you likely WORK at!


If theres one thing I hate about people working in gyms, its when they do STUPED ASUMPTIONS on a WE BISITE assuming the know WTF THEY MEAN!


TALLER THAN A REAL ROCK? Yeah right IDIOT you should look at THE GALLERY at RED ROCKS its so fucking steep you would INSTANTLY poop and pee at the same time (and smell accordingly). I heard that theres this one route like 12d that bakar free climbed thats never yet been done before!!!!
Amazingly, what I thought was a weaksauce troll attempt was apparently sufficient to bait the crowd over at SuperTopo. Well played.

http://www.supertopo.com/...6&tn=0#msg455381


billcoe_


Sep 25, 2007, 4:09 PM
Post #33 of 42 (3070 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shu wrote:
It's definitely acceptable, and even encouraged to upgrade routes.

The first step is to notify the guidebook author that he rated the route wrong, and suggest your new rating.

If you are unsure whether it's 11b or 11c, just round up. It makes everyone feel better.

The climbing community is very lucky to have climbing gyms, it is a place where we can go and become familiar with ratings so that we can then go outside and fix all the wildly varying outside ratings.

If that 5.10- feels harder than the blue 5.11b proj you're working in the gym, the rating must be wrong, and it is your duty to the climbing community to upgrade it.

h ha ! Laugh Exactly.

Also.....

I heard California gyms are constantly 2-3 grades harder than Massachusetts gyms too.

So you need to add the state abbreviation to the end of the grade to get a real feel for it. I hear that from the professionals all the time. So 5.10c CA is really about 5.9 MA or 5.9 CT - in fact anywhere on the East Coast except any gym Henry Barber has ever climbed in.

Then it's equal.

I hope that helps settle all this arguing and yelling. Well, it will help until the French and the Germans get here anyway.


quiteatingmysteak


Sep 25, 2007, 9:16 PM
Post #34 of 42 (2995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [billcoe_] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Fuck the euros.


I read in an Alpinist that Alex Huber uses tick marks... commie bastard.


mturner


Sep 26, 2007, 12:15 AM
Post #35 of 42 (2950 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 980

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

quiteatingmysteak wrote:
Fuck the euros.


I read in an Alpinist that Alex Huber uses tick marks... commie bastard.

Don't you dare try to make this into another thread about tick marks. Mad


PepsiTwist


Sep 26, 2007, 5:20 AM
Post #36 of 42 (2916 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2007
Posts: 26

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

quiteatingmysteak wrote:
you have FIVE posts yet NO common sense!!!!!!!!!!

Since when did ones' post count become the merit by which we judge ones' comment?

Perhaps it has always been that way. I honestly feel it unnecessarily to point out the failures of such a system. I do, however, pity the essence of your being for even using that as a rebuttal.


quiteatingmysteak


Sep 26, 2007, 6:52 AM
Post #37 of 42 (2906 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [PepsiTwist] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

PepsiTwist wrote:
quiteatingmysteak wrote:
you have FIVE posts yet NO common sense!!!!!!!!!!

Since when did ones' post count become the merit by which we judge ones' comment?

Perhaps it has always been that way. I honestly feel it unnecessarily to point out the failures of such a system. I do, however, pity the essence of your being for even using that as a rebuttal.


My POINT is still VALID.... How about a solo off scaredy cat? Any boulder problem you want.



now you have SIX posts ONE for EACH of your BRAIN CELLS!!!!!!!!!!!


slablizard


Sep 26, 2007, 6:39 PM
Post #38 of 42 (2868 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: [shu] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

You're absolutely right..real rock SUCKS!

Stay in the gym man! :)

Angelic

shu wrote:
Valarc wrote:

It's a lot of fun, it's a source of a good workout and a creative outlet for routesetters, but it sure as hell ain't a substitute for climbing real rock.

Real rock isn't even DESIGNED for climbing. Plastic holds are designed ergonomically and for climbing.


Why would I want to climb anything that's not specifically designed to be climbed?

Forgot to write anything edit


PepsiTwist


Sep 27, 2007, 3:11 AM
Post #39 of 42 (2833 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2007
Posts: 26

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So, I suppose we could sit here trolling each other all day long. Though the entertaining thing is that you dont even realize you're being trolled. Hm.. think about, go talk to your mom, and when she explains what just happened, come back and apologize for your stupidity. Or atleast relay her apology to us, God know's she owes the world one.


quiteatingmysteak


Sep 27, 2007, 3:18 AM
Post #40 of 42 (2829 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804

Re: [PepsiTwist] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

PepsiTwist wrote:
So, I suppose we could sit here trolling each other all day long. Though the entertaining thing is that you dont even realize you're being trolled. Hm.. think about, go talk to your mom, and when she explains what just happened, come back and apologize for your stupidity. Or atleast relay her apology to us, God know's she owes the world one.


my mom died when i was born, so it's kind of hard to ask her anything.


wildthing14


Sep 27, 2007, 3:32 AM
Post #41 of 42 (2815 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 50

Re: [PepsiTwist] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

wow!! this turned into one hell of a troll.....Pepsi twist got it right -"Seriously, do everybody a favor and next time you feel like making a jack-ass out of yourself, give us a bit of a heads up so we can make popcorn and get comfy. " i'm all for outdoor climbing but seriously, it's not like all the gyms need to burn, they're not that bad Wink


PepsiTwist


Sep 27, 2007, 10:39 PM
Post #42 of 42 (2755 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 25, 2007
Posts: 26

Re: [quiteatingmysteak] Downgrading, Upgrading? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Meh, who would've guessed she'd be the lucky one.


Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Sport Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook