|
|
|
|
shoo
Aug 5, 2009, 2:40 PM
Post #1 of 104
(15255 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
I am constantly shocked at what some climbing manufacturers consider "good ideas." These are just baffling. 1. ATC-Sport - Black Diamond There are two slots on almost all tube-type belay devices for a reason. And no, it's not so you can belay two people at once. 2. Bionic 8 - Mammut You use a fig. 8 because it offers smooth rappels. They suck at pretty much everything else. So you go out and make a device that's an i-beam version, eliminating the smooth bar stock, and likely a lot of the smoothness of the rappel. And seriously, do you really need to be counting the ounces for a sport rappelling?!? Better yet, you are seriously sport rappelling!?! 3. Pyramid - Trango This is a good idea like Coke-II and communism. Might sound cool on paper, but when you actually try it, it sucks. If you've ever tried to use one of these, I'm sorry. I'd rather hip belay. 4. Mad Lock - Mad Rock There was a reason Petzl discontinued this design. Though some may appreciate the versatility of a belay device that can magically turn into a knife, I think I'll stay away. And what's with this removable pin crap? I say hell no to the frankenreverso. Anyone have any others? Edited to add Mad Lock to the list.
(This post was edited by shoo on Aug 13, 2009, 5:34 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
robdotcalm
Aug 5, 2009, 2:52 PM
Post #2 of 104
(15233 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027
|
Huh? I've been using the Trango Pyramid since it came out years ago and have not experienced any difficulties. When I started climbing 40 years ago, I belayed around the waist. No way am I going back to that. Seriously, what do you find wrong the Pyramid/ Cheers, Rob.calm
|
|
|
|
|
shoo
Aug 5, 2009, 3:13 PM
Post #3 of 104
(15198 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
Incredibly jerky, especially on fuzzy ropes. Locks up just fine when you want it too, but also locks up pretty well when you don't want it to. Compared with pretty much everything else out there that I've used (and I've used a lot of different devices), it it awful. Hell, I once used a rappel ring as a sticht plate once and had better results. Note: don't do that. It's an incredibly bad idea. It was on TR and I had a backup belay.
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2009, 3:18 PM
Post #4 of 104
(15191 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
I love my pyramid. The worst belay device is the Trango Jaws. It locks up like nobodies business.
|
|
|
|
|
taydude
Aug 5, 2009, 3:32 PM
Post #5 of 104
(15164 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2006
Posts: 531
|
I knew a guy that had a pyramid when I was fairly new. He didn't seem to have any problems. He loved how thick it was and that it apparently didn't get sharp edges as fast as other belay devices. He was also really pumped on the "cooling ridges". Now that i'm more experienced I still don't know if he knew wtf he was talking about. I've never had any complaints with a belay device being too hot but I suppose if you have wimpy hands the pyramid would cool down faster than other devices.
|
|
|
|
|
chadnsc
Aug 5, 2009, 3:37 PM
Post #6 of 104
(15146 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 24, 2003
Posts: 4449
|
shoo wrote: Incredibly jerky, especially on fuzzy ropes. Locks up just fine when you want it too, but also locks up pretty well when you don't want it to. Compared with pretty much everything else out there that I've used (and I've used a lot of different devices), it it awful. Hell, I once used a rappel ring as a sticht plate once and had better results. Note: don't do that. It's an incredibly bad idea. It was on TR and I had a backup belay. I used a Pyramid device for years and never had any issues with it while belaying or rappelling. I think you just didn't have the ability to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
acorneau
Aug 5, 2009, 3:46 PM
Post #7 of 104
(15124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
FTW!
|
|
|
|
|
healyje
Aug 5, 2009, 3:58 PM
Post #8 of 104
(15097 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204
|
The worst modern belay device? All those devices are bomb - the weak link in the belaying is the same as it ever was, the operator.
|
|
|
|
|
sspssp
Aug 5, 2009, 4:13 PM
Post #9 of 104
(15065 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 1731
|
johnwesely wrote: I love my pyramid. The worst belay device is the Trango Jaws. It locks up like nobodies business. Well it goes to show why there are so many belay devices on the market. I like the Jaws for belaying with skinnier ropes. Anymore, I use it mostly for raps (since I will take a Cinch even on multi-pitch). I like the fact that it will mostly lock off just from the weight of the rope. Makes dealing with tangles on the way down easier. But I thought it worked great for twin and half ropes (back when I climbed on doubles).
(This post was edited by sspssp on Aug 5, 2009, 4:14 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
swaghole
Aug 5, 2009, 4:16 PM
Post #10 of 104
(15055 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 20, 2006
Posts: 371
|
Wild Country VC Pro. Worst ever modern belay device. I bought while waiting for the reverso 3 to be available (and I'm a gear whore). I thought it would work well since it looked like the BD ATC XP and it was cheaper. I returned it to the store the next day.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Aug 5, 2009, 4:33 PM
Post #11 of 104
(15030 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
swaghole wrote: Wild Country VC Pro. Worst ever modern belay device. I bought while waiting for the reverso 3 to be available (and I'm a gear whore). I thought it would work well since it looked like the BD ATC XP and it was cheaper. I returned it to the store the next day. Why? Looks like just another tuber. cant be too much wrong with that. or can it? qwert
|
|
|
|
|
swaghole
Aug 5, 2009, 4:42 PM
Post #12 of 104
(15021 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 20, 2006
Posts: 371
|
qwert wrote: swaghole wrote: Wild Country VC Pro. Worst ever modern belay device. I bought while waiting for the reverso 3 to be available (and I'm a gear whore). I thought it would work well since it looked like the BD ATC XP and it was cheaper. I returned it to the store the next day. Why? Looks like just another tuber. cant be too much wrong with that. or can it? qwert That's what I thought when I bought it. I had a hard time lowering my wife on a 10.5mm rope using the VC Pro on the low friction side. Even a new 10.2 was extremely jerky. Forget about rapelling on a 10.5. I weigh 180lbs and could barely lower myself using the low-friction mode. A fellow climber also had the same problems and returned the device... I didn't try the VC Pro on a skinny rope but the device should have handled a 10.2 and 10.5 rope without binding. The BD ATC XP handles much better and offers the high-friction mode. It cost a few dollars more but it's well worth it.
|
|
|
|
|
Skidemon27
Aug 5, 2009, 5:16 PM
Post #13 of 104
(14971 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 15, 2007
Posts: 232
|
dudue i completely agree worst device ever!!! i had onelol same orange and all and it would feed ropes for nothing, and the teeth and dam useless on it, i even tried using the other side (no teeth side) and no better either....and just for kickers, i had on my biner, and some how it fell off the biner and only fell 4 feet maybe 5 feet tops to the ground, didnt hit any rock or anything just dirt and the steel cable broke off!!! no joke, no noob mistake, just snapped off....i was stunned,, so that bitch went right back to the store!! and let me also point out the fact the the belay device was only 4 hours old!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
bigjonnyc
Aug 5, 2009, 5:49 PM
Post #14 of 104
(14935 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 17, 2004
Posts: 369
|
Skidemon27 wrote: ...and let me also point out the fact the the belay device was only 4 hours old!!!! I truly doubt that the device was manufactured only 4 hours prior to your using it.
|
|
|
|
|
climbingaggie03
Aug 5, 2009, 5:56 PM
Post #15 of 104
(14924 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: 1173
|
taydude wrote: I knew a guy that had a pyramid when I was fairly new. He didn't seem to have any problems. He loved how thick it was and that it apparently didn't get sharp edges as fast as other belay devices. He was also really pumped on the "cooling ridges". Now that i'm more experienced I still don't know if he knew wtf he was talking about. I've never had any complaints with a belay device being too hot but I suppose if you have wimpy hands the pyramid would cool down faster than other devices. Maybe I just have wimpy hands, but I've definitely had my belay device get too hot to handle (for a short time) usually when simul rapping on skinny ropes for multiple raps, I don't know if "cooling ridges" would help with that, but things can and do heat up.
|
|
|
|
|
mtnkid85
Aug 5, 2009, 6:19 PM
Post #16 of 104
(14896 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 18, 2005
Posts: 221
|
You guys are a bunch of winers! I used the Pyramid for several years it was a fine belay device. The Jaws was my fav device until I started using the autoblocking rigs. The deep Vs are the reason I like it, wonderful for double ropes! Ill maybe give the mammut 8 to ya though, just doesnt seem like theres is much of a market of an "improved" fig 8.
|
|
|
|
|
suprasoup
Aug 5, 2009, 6:21 PM
Post #17 of 104
(14894 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2005
Posts: 309
|
Weird. I love my Trango Jaws, had it for eight years now. Like the fact that I can use it in high friction side or low friction. Gives smooth rappels and catches falls effortlessly, large ropes or small.
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2009, 8:10 PM
Post #18 of 104
(14819 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
suprasoup wrote: Weird. I love my Trango Jaws, had it for eight years now. Like the fact that I can use it in high friction side or low friction. Gives smooth rappels and catches falls effortlessly, large ropes or small. To be fair to Trango. The only ropes I have used the Jaws on are the fat gym ropes at the gym I work at.
|
|
|
|
|
suprasoup
Aug 5, 2009, 8:46 PM
Post #19 of 104
(14771 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 7, 2005
Posts: 309
|
Gym Ropes. (shudder)
|
|
|
|
|
RockLimbaugh
Aug 5, 2009, 9:15 PM
Post #20 of 104
(14733 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 3, 2009
Posts: 287
|
Or maybe it's just the users. Hard to tell which sometimes.
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Aug 5, 2009, 9:57 PM
Post #22 of 104
(14662 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there.
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Aug 5, 2009, 10:22 PM
Post #23 of 104
(14639 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
vegastradguy wrote: interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there. You have just taken the joy out of making fun of it.
|
|
|
|
|
taydude
Aug 5, 2009, 10:27 PM
Post #24 of 104
(14634 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2006
Posts: 531
|
the jewel is actually stainless steel right? That should help reduce the black hands crap on your rope. Seems like a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
I_do
Aug 6, 2009, 1:09 AM
Post #25 of 104
(14593 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1232
|
vegastradguy wrote: interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there. Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone...
|
|
|
|
|
Myxomatosis
Aug 6, 2009, 1:39 AM
Post #27 of 104
(7362 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063
|
Haha. My mate was given a Sport and still doesnt use it
|
|
|
|
|
Myxomatosis
Aug 6, 2009, 3:38 AM
Post #29 of 104
(7310 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063
|
I_do wrote: Myxomatosis wrote: Haha. My mate was given a Sport and still doesnt use it Well if given by someone who doesn't climb I'd appreciate the gesture i guess... Well he won it through a boulder competition. He then trys to belay me on his eight in a stich plate config...... I usually end up giving him by ATCX
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Aug 6, 2009, 3:56 AM
Post #30 of 104
(7302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
This Faders device is amoung the worst around. On fatter ropes at least belay is horrible. Stich plates are better. Or better yet for those on a budget go the ALDI device! http://www.aldi.com.au/...offers/2827_9045.htm
(This post was edited by patto on Aug 6, 2009, 3:58 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Aug 6, 2009, 7:34 AM
Post #31 of 104
(7267 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
I_do wrote: vegastradguy wrote: interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there. Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... I don't know which part of europe you have observed, but i also have never seen those things. MAybe in the gym? I guess if you are only climbing at the gym then you won't miss the second slot. And the edelrid jewel? No way that this is used, since it isnt even anounced here. The only time i have seen that was here in the outdoor show blog. Its not even on the german edelrid site, and its also not an old lucky device that just got the edelrid rebranding now. qwert
|
|
|
|
|
a-e-jones
Aug 6, 2009, 10:37 AM
Post #32 of 104
(7238 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 5, 2008
Posts: 295
|
I_do wrote: Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... i've seen alot of people around france with the ATC sport :\ didn't want to fork out the extra 2-3eu for the guide or reverso 3 i guess
(This post was edited by a-e-jones on Aug 6, 2009, 1:01 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Aug 6, 2009, 1:28 PM
Post #33 of 104
(7197 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
Myxomatosis wrote: I_do wrote: Myxomatosis wrote: Haha. My mate was given a Sport and still doesnt use it Well if given by someone who doesn't climb I'd appreciate the gesture i guess... Well he won it through a boulder competition. He then trys to belay me on his eight in a stich plate config...... I usually end up giving him by ATCX They give away belay devices as prizes in bouldering comps? Funny!
|
|
|
|
|
reverse_dyno
Aug 6, 2009, 2:47 PM
Post #34 of 104
(7153 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 8, 2005
Posts: 69
|
what about the Mammut Smart? Doesn't look that smart to me, looks complicated. Lots of people use them in Swiss climbing gyms. Once again, only one slot. Mark
|
Attachments:
|
Smart_bild1.eps_Zoom.jpeg
(97.5 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
Skidemon27
Aug 6, 2009, 3:25 PM
Post #36 of 104
(7118 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 15, 2007
Posts: 232
|
bigjonnyc wrote: Skidemon27 wrote: ...and let me also point out the fact the the belay device was only 4 hours old!!!! I truly doubt that the device was manufactured only 4 hours prior to your using it. 4 hours old from purchase,,,, moron
|
|
|
|
|
hacksaw
Aug 6, 2009, 3:27 PM
Post #37 of 104
(7118 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 169
|
So, what do you guys think of the Kong Gi-Gi? I'm in the market for a new belay/rappel plate. I'd be interested in hearing from any one that has used one...
|
|
|
|
|
shoo
Aug 6, 2009, 4:28 PM
Post #38 of 104
(7095 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
I've never used the smart, so I can't comment. I will say that I don't dislike single line, autolocking devices (grigri, cinch, etc) just because of what they are. I often dislike their users, but that's another discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
a-e-jones
Aug 6, 2009, 4:53 PM
Post #39 of 104
(7081 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 5, 2008
Posts: 295
|
reverse_dyno wrote: what about the Mammut Smart? Doesn't look that smart to me, looks complicated. Lots of people use them in Swiss climbing gyms. Once again, only one slot. Mark when i got the smart it was because it was cheap and i thought it'd make a good present for the miss since i have a good 30kg on her, i tried it once and i've long ditched my grigri for it, i think its a fantastic gym short crag belay device
|
|
|
|
|
brenta
Aug 6, 2009, 5:45 PM
Post #40 of 104
(7047 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: 50
|
hacksaw wrote: So, what do you guys think of the Kong Gi-Gi? I'm in the market for a new belay/rappel plate. I'd be interested in hearing from any one that has used one... I used a GiGi for a couple of years and then retired it when it developed a rough edge. It's good for belaying one or two seconds, with the usual proviso on the diameter of the ropes. It is unsuitable for lead belay. It's OK for rappels, and it's very good as component of pulley systems. One advantage it has over devices like the ATC Guide and the Reverso 3 in that application is that, of the two symmetric holes, one is used to connect the GiGi to the anchor, while the other provides a convenient attachment point through which a locker may be clipped. With the GiGi you need another device for lead belay. However, a team of two can get away with one GiGi and another device and this is can be a very light combination. When belaying with one rope, care must be taken to avoid rotation of the brake biner. The easiest way is to clip it to the biner connecting the GiGi to the anchor. Giving slack to the follower is a pain, more or less as with the other "guide-mode" devices.
|
|
|
|
|
karmiclimber
Aug 6, 2009, 5:50 PM
Post #41 of 104
(7050 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1058
|
Agreed. Unless you are speed climbing at the gym, who needs one?
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Aug 6, 2009, 6:12 PM
Post #42 of 104
(7033 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
kachoong wrote: Myxomatosis wrote: I_do wrote: Myxomatosis wrote: Haha. My mate was given a Sport and still doesnt use it Well if given by someone who doesn't climb I'd appreciate the gesture i guess... Well he won it through a boulder competition. He then trys to belay me on his eight in a stich plate config...... I usually end up giving him by ATCX They give away belay devices as prizes in bouldering comps? Funny! Well, they didn't know what else to do with it.
|
|
|
|
|
imnotclever
Aug 6, 2009, 7:51 PM
Post #43 of 104
(6975 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2003
Posts: 10000
|
|
|
|
|
|
dlintz
Aug 6, 2009, 8:03 PM
Post #45 of 104
(6962 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2002
Posts: 1982
|
reverse_dyno wrote: what about the Mammut Smart? Doesn't look that smart to me, looks complicated. Lots of people use them in Swiss climbing gyms. Once again, only one slot. Mark Complicated? It's got a flippin' diagram on it! I'd buy one if I didn't already own a bunch of belay devices. d.
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Aug 6, 2009, 8:20 PM
Post #46 of 104
(6928 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
camhead wrote: imnotclever wrote: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=1787;[/image] those are actually really useful when you want a backup, or when you are climbing with one single and twins. Is this going to be like the razor wars? Twin blade...quatro...fusion?
|
|
|
|
|
Myxomatosis
Aug 6, 2009, 9:06 PM
Post #47 of 104
(6902 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063
|
kachoong wrote: Myxomatosis wrote: I_do wrote: Myxomatosis wrote: Haha. My mate was given a Sport and still doesnt use it Well if given by someone who doesn't climb I'd appreciate the gesture i guess... Well he won it through a boulder competition. He then trys to belay me on his eight in a stich plate config...... I usually end up giving him by ATCX They give away belay devices as prizes in bouldering comps? Funny! Well long story but because we held the comp later in the year most companies (BD/Petzl) had already spent there freebe budget for our region So they gave us a big discount on buying goods, so the organiser brought up as much he could. You can only give away so many boulder brush's Vaude did come to the party and gave us four top of the range packs..... nice company!!
|
|
|
|
|
I_do
Aug 6, 2009, 11:02 PM
Post #48 of 104
(6870 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1232
|
a-e-jones wrote: I_do wrote: Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... i've seen alot of people around france with the ATC sport :\ didn't want to fork out the extra 2-3eu for the guide or reverso 3 i guess And they say the dutch are cheap... In all fairness I haven't been climbing in France for a while, will make up by going to Bleau in october (I just love saying that I'm so stoked to finally go there) probably not a lot of atc sports there.
|
|
|
|
|
a-e-jones
Aug 7, 2009, 10:08 AM
Post #49 of 104
(6822 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 5, 2008
Posts: 295
|
I_do wrote: a-e-jones wrote: I_do wrote: Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... i've seen alot of people around france with the ATC sport :\ didn't want to fork out the extra 2-3eu for the guide or reverso 3 i guess And they say the dutch are cheap... In all fairness I haven't been climbing in France for a while, will make up by going to Bleau in october (I just love saying that I'm so stoked to finally go there) probably not a lot of atc sports there. i've been living in paris for over a year now, so when you come by drop a line and i'll give you some easy tips to find your way around all the footpaths that connect the fields
|
|
|
|
|
vertical_planar
Aug 7, 2009, 11:24 AM
Post #50 of 104
(6798 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 320
|
When I am extreme rock climbing-ing I don't like the ATC V. It's good for climbing schools though. But then ATC XXXIII is better...
|
|
|
|
|
USnavy
Aug 7, 2009, 12:31 PM
Post #52 of 104
(4770 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
camhead wrote: imnotclever wrote: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=1787;[/image] those are actually really useful when you want a backup, or when you are climbing with one single and twins. Or when your leading on triplet halves. Three 5 mm ropes = da schznit for mass rope drag reduction!
|
|
|
|
|
dta95b7r
Aug 7, 2009, 1:05 PM
Post #53 of 104
(4752 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2007
Posts: 74
|
yeah the vcpro is really terrible ended up giving mine away though its perfect for the I LOVE SHORT ROPINGZ MY FRIENDS crowd
|
|
|
|
|
Crack_Addict_Ty
Aug 7, 2009, 6:19 PM
Post #54 of 104
(4685 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 7, 2009
Posts: 57
|
bigjonnyc wrote: Skidemon27 wrote: ...and let me also point out the fact the the belay device was only 4 hours old!!!! I truly doubt that the device was manufactured only 4 hours prior to your using it. I can sort of back this up. I had one where the wire pulled out of the body of the device after only a few months of use. I didn't abuse it in any way. I brought it to the pro shop at the gym I climb at and they replaced it for free but claimed that it could happen again as they had seen this happen to a lot of the VC Pro IIs. I am surprised WC hasn't recalled them. P.S. They are still completely safe when the wire pulls out, they just wouldn't be very easy to belay with.
(This post was edited by Crack_Addict_Ty on Aug 7, 2009, 6:21 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
vegastradguy
Aug 7, 2009, 6:38 PM
Post #55 of 104
(4675 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 28, 2002
Posts: 5919
|
I_do wrote: vegastradguy wrote: interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there. Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... none, really. just going off Edelrid and BD's sales of the devices over there- both of which are fairly strong. the jewel is SS, and it is nice- i have to say it might be my new favorite crag belay device! edited because i apparently cannot figure out how to use the quote function today.
(This post was edited by vegastradguy on Aug 7, 2009, 8:11 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Aug 7, 2009, 7:46 PM
Post #56 of 104
(4640 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
vegastradguy wrote: I_do wrote: vegastradguy wrote: interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there. none, really. just going off Edelrid and BD's sales of the devices over there- both of which are fairly strong. the jewel is SS, and it is nice- i have to say it might be my new favorite crag belay device! Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... What they said didn't make sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Aug 7, 2009, 8:44 PM
Post #57 of 104
(4608 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
vegastradguy wrote: I_do wrote: vegastradguy wrote: interestingly, while the BD ATC Sport is a very low seller in the US, its one of the best sellers in Europe- and its not the only single slot device out there- the Edelrid Jewel is another one (which i actually really like for cragging, after playing with one for a weekend after the OR show!)- neither sell well in the US, but in Europe they're fairly common because folks rarely rappel over there. Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... none, really. just going off Edelrid and BD's sales of the devices over there- both of which are fairly strong. the jewel is SS, and it is nice- i have to say it might be my new favorite crag belay device! edited because i apparently cannot figure out how to use the quote function today. Ok, now i understand what you are saying. Quoting is such a hard thing The ATC sport - dont know. maybe that is indeed common everywhere apart from the areas i am, but the edelrid jewel? Maybe you are confusing it with the zap-o-mat or edelrid told you bullshit (or i am blind) but that thing is not available anywhere. Neither at edelrids homepage, nor at the big shops. Google only finds it mentioned in this thread. qwert
|
|
|
|
|
I_do
Aug 8, 2009, 2:59 AM
Post #58 of 104
(4578 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1232
|
a-e-jones wrote: I_do wrote: a-e-jones wrote: I_do wrote: Dude, how much time have you spent in Europe? I have never seen either of those devices being used by anyone... i've seen alot of people around france with the ATC sport :\ didn't want to fork out the extra 2-3eu for the guide or reverso 3 i guess And they say the dutch are cheap... In all fairness I haven't been climbing in France for a while, will make up by going to Bleau in october (I just love saying that I'm so stoked to finally go there) probably not a lot of atc sports there. i've been living in paris for over a year now, so when you come by drop a line and i'll give you some easy tips to find your way around all the footpaths that connect the fields That's awesome, I don't think any of my mates have been there either. Will send you a pm closer to date! Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
nb_boarder16
Aug 8, 2009, 9:19 PM
Post #59 of 104
(4520 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2006
Posts: 45
|
The faders sum. Our local gym uses em and while no belay device will be bad enough to prefer a hip belay, this one comes the closest. The response is terrible and the locking mechanism can be disabled if the device gets caught up in between you and the wall or your harness or whatever. Never take my eye off this one...
(This post was edited by nb_boarder16 on Aug 8, 2009, 9:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Aug 9, 2009, 11:52 PM
Post #60 of 104
(4433 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
qwert wrote: the edelrid jewel? Maybe you are confusing it with the zap-o-mat or edelrid told you bullshit (or i am blind) but that thing is not available anywhere. Neither at edelrids homepage, nor at the big shops. Google only finds it mentioned in this thread. qwert Try changing the spelling to Jul Qwert. No kidding:-) Single slot, stainless, looks as worthless as it sounds. http://www.edelridna.com/...ts&product_id=67
|
|
|
|
|
I_do
Aug 10, 2009, 3:02 AM
Post #61 of 104
(4403 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 2, 2008
Posts: 1232
|
nb_boarder16 wrote: The faders sum. Our local gym uses em and while no belay device will be bad enough to prefer a hip belay, this one comes the closest. The response is terrible and the locking mechanism can be disabled if the device gets caught up in between you and the wall or your harness or whatever. Never take my eye off this one... Reeaally? The sum was the first autolocking device I used which I liked so I got one now. Lowering ain't great but for feeding out slack it's the best and it handles a variety of rope sizes well. What do you use it for? I typically only use it for single pitch lead belaying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rtwilli4
Aug 11, 2009, 3:25 AM
Post #63 of 104
(4286 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867
|
shoo wrote: I am constantly shocked at what some climbing manufacturers consider "good ideas." These are just baffling. 1. ATC-Sport - Black Diamond [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/images/gear/products/4/17794-medium_620052_atc_sport.jpg[/image] There are two slots on almost all tube-type belay devices for a reason. And no, it's not so you can belay two people at once. 2. Bionic 8 - Mammut [image]http://s7ondemand1.scene7.com/is/image/MoosejawMB/10085392_zm_product.jpg[/image] You use a fig. 8 because it offers smooth rappels. They suck at pretty much everything else. So you go out and make a device that's an i-beam version, eliminating the smooth bar stock, and likely a lot of the smoothness of the rappel. And seriously, do you really need to be counting the ounces for a sport rappelling?!? Better yet, you are seriously sport rappelling!?! 3. Pyramid - Trango [image]http://ai.pricegrabber.com/pi/8/93/98/89398908_160.jpg[/image] This is a good idea like Coke-II and communism. Might sound cool on paper, but when you actually try it, it sucks. If you've ever tried to use one of these, I'm sorry. I'd rather hip belay. Anyone have any others? The Pyramid never gave me any problems, but then again I'm not sure I've done much w/ it other than TR belay. My take on the first two: Companies don't come out w/ products like that for climbers. They come out w/ products like that for people who think they are climbers, or who are just getting into the sport. BD knows good and well that no self respecting climber is actually going to buy a belay device that you can't rap with, and Mammut is just trying to make a very boring and almost useless device look cool. They market these devices as "lighter alternative with cutting edge technology" hoping that people who don't know any better will spend the extra cash, thinking that they are getting a better product. Not to mention two very large demographics that these devices are pushed at... gym climbers (BD) and Sport Rappellers (Mammut).
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Aug 11, 2009, 4:44 AM
Post #64 of 104
(4269 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
In reply to: I knew a guy that had a pyramid when I was fairly new. He didn't seem to have any problems. He loved how thick it was and that it apparently didn't get sharp edges as fast as other belay devices. He was also really pumped on the "cooling ridges". Now that i'm more experienced I still don't know if he knew wtf he was talking about. I've never had any complaints with a belay device being too hot but I suppose if you have wimpy hands the pyramid would cool down faster than other devices. If you rap fast it's worse, and if you climb fast laps and rap fast (like when rope soloing on a short crag) the device can get hot enough to burn you, but it doesn't burn your hands, it burns your ass. I rope solo on a short crag and my ATC gets so hot that even through my shorts, hanging off a gear loop, it can be uncomfortable. Maybe I should try a Pyramid. I've already had to retire one ATC when it wore the sides into blades, a Pyramid is sounding better and better.
(This post was edited by milesenoell on Aug 11, 2009, 4:51 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
cjon3s
Aug 11, 2009, 4:51 AM
Post #65 of 104
(4260 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 8, 2009
Posts: 150
|
How long did it take you to wear through your ATC? Btw, my guide and xp rarely get hot enough to burn me, even on full length rappels.
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Aug 11, 2009, 4:53 AM
Post #66 of 104
(4260 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
vertical_planar wrote: shoo wrote: Has anyone else noticed that this looks like the eye of thundera? Thundercats Hooooooooe!
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Aug 11, 2009, 4:59 AM
Post #67 of 104
(4258 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
cjon3s wrote: How long did it take you to wear through your ATC? Btw, my guide and xp rarely get hot enough to burn me, even on full length rappels. about a year, maybe a year and a half of heavy climbing and the edges were scary sharp. (I was able to go climb for an hour or two 3-5 times a week, and rope soloing means that there aren't any breaks like when you climb with partners. Each session included at least a dozen raps.) It may have been exacerbated by having a fat rope and/or the fact that I was doing really fast single strand rappels. edited to add: The ATC wasn't entirely "worn out", it had just worn sharp blade-like edges at one end of each of the slots. What I noticed about the wear was that the rope strand going to my brake hand rides over the edge and thus the metal stays rounded, but he strand going up to the anchor leaves the device at an angle that wears the metal sharp. I had typically been using the same (top) slot each time. That meant that the wear pattern was always the same for each slot even when the device was turned around. To fix the problem all I had to do was alternate slots for each rap. (climb, rap off top slot. climb, rap off bottom slot, etc.) The problem is only likely to show up on single strand raps. On regular, double strand raps the device is likely to get put on in different orientations just by chance, and thus never get too sharp. If you ever notice your ATC getting sharp, just put the sharp side toward your brake hand for a few raps.
(This post was edited by milesenoell on Aug 11, 2009, 6:10 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Aug 11, 2009, 5:28 AM
Post #68 of 104
(4248 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
I suspect that the heat issues I've had are at least partially due to heat building up over multiple rappels faster than it is being dissipated between climbs. edited to add: I was also climbing for speed much of the time. Since it was over a lunch break and limited time I wanted to get as pumped as I could in the limited amount of time. My climbing was not at all typical, and thus my issue with the heat is not likely to be a concern for very many people.
(This post was edited by milesenoell on Aug 11, 2009, 5:31 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Aug 11, 2009, 5:39 AM
Post #69 of 104
(4244 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
What are you guys talking about?? I've used most of these and they are fine. This may sound crazy, but maybe, just maybe, the people using a single slot belay device know that its a single slot. Its a new idea, its fun, kinda hokey but whatever, it works and some people probably swear by it. The VC pro caught up on your 10.5 rope? 1. Wash that sucker! (the rope, not your wife ><) 2. What, are you speed lowering? Gri Gri's are rad, man. Anyone thats had stubborn friends get into climbing whose owned one will say so! Any belay device is an improvement on a hip belay, and they all work. Lots of gear out there is retarded, but hey, as long as you're making new gear thats different, and someone will buy it, how bad can it be? p.s. the smart is VERY rad and VERY eazy to use. Think of it as a 30 dollar gri gri. Used it to clean a route recently on rappel, backed it up but otherwise treated it like a gri gri, rap, brush sand, rap, brush sand, SEND! p.s. it was 10a and I flubbed it.
|
|
|
|
|
milesenoell
Aug 11, 2009, 6:15 AM
Post #70 of 104
(4235 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 1156
|
quiteatingmysteak wrote: p.s. the smart is VERY rad and VERY eazy to use. Think of it as a 30 dollar gri gri. Used it to clean a route recently on rappel, backed it up but otherwise treated it like a gri gri, rap, brush sand, rap, brush sand, SEND! p.s. it was 10a and I flubbed it. Just being a new route gets enough style points to cover the failed send.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Aug 13, 2009, 12:49 AM
Post #73 of 104
(4098 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
quiteatingmysteak wrote: This may sound crazy, but maybe, just maybe, the people using a single slot belay device know that its a single slot. Its a new idea, its fun, kinda hokey but whatever, it works and some people probably swear by it. No, it isn't a new idea. About 40+ years old, actually. Before the Sticht Plate, some climbers used a single link of 3/8" chain.
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Aug 13, 2009, 1:57 AM
Post #74 of 104
(4080 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
marc801 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: This may sound crazy, but maybe, just maybe, the people using a single slot belay device know that its a single slot. Its a new idea, its fun, kinda hokey but whatever, it works and some people probably swear by it. No, it isn't a new idea. About 40+ years old, actually. Before the Sticht Plate, some climbers used a single link of 3/8" chain. THANKS I WILL MAKE SURE TO AMEND MY FUTURE STATEMENTS TO REFLECT THE TWO GUYZ THAT USED CHAINLINKZ MUCH CARE/LOVE GREGARIUS
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Aug 13, 2009, 4:03 AM
Post #75 of 104
(4013 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
quiteatingmysteak wrote: marc801 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: This may sound crazy, but maybe, just maybe, the people using a single slot belay device know that its a single slot. Its a new idea, its fun, kinda hokey but whatever, it works and some people probably swear by it. No, it isn't a new idea. About 40+ years old, actually. Before the Sticht Plate, some climbers used a single link of 3/8" chain. THANKS I WILL MAKE SURE TO AMEND MY FUTURE STATEMENTS TO REFLECT THE TWO GUYZ THAT USED CHAINLINKZ MUCH CARE/LOVE GREGARIUS Quit being an ass. The Sticht Plate was also a single slot device and was the standard belay device for years. And a hell of a lot more than two guys used the chain links. If you're going to comment on climbing history, at least get it right.
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Aug 13, 2009, 4:59 AM
Post #76 of 104
(3234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
marc801 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: marc801 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: This may sound crazy, but maybe, just maybe, the people using a single slot belay device know that its a single slot. Its a new idea, its fun, kinda hokey but whatever, it works and some people probably swear by it. No, it isn't a new idea. About 40+ years old, actually. Before the Sticht Plate, some climbers used a single link of 3/8" chain. THANKS I WILL MAKE SURE TO AMEND MY FUTURE STATEMENTS TO REFLECT THE TWO GUYZ THAT USED CHAINLINKZ MUCH CARE/LOVE GREGARIUS Quit being an ass. The Sticht Plate was also a single slot device and was the standard belay device for years. And a hell of a lot more than two guys used the chain links. If you're going to comment on climbing history, at least get it right. homey i dont know what crawled up your hex and died but what do you expect when you nitpick like a high school math teacher? I'll show my work and not just the answers from here on out, I promise!!11 This is a minor blip in the radar of climbing history. I know my climbing history, real history. White spider shit and stories from way back when before you were a curmudgeon. Don't try to pigeonhole me in with other young guys who don't know what they are talking about. I'm gonna have another beer, enjoy your internet nazi'sm. I'm sure its appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
quiteatingmysteak
Aug 13, 2009, 4:59 AM
Post #77 of 104
(3233 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 804
|
And put your real name up on your profile coward. Who the fuck are you? (and the reference to the 'new idea' was the auto braking Smart device... but whatever slice )
(This post was edited by quiteatingmysteak on Aug 13, 2009, 5:10 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Aug 13, 2009, 12:56 PM
Post #78 of 104
(3200 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
quiteatingmysteak wrote: marc801 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: marc801 wrote: quiteatingmysteak wrote: This may sound crazy, but maybe, just maybe, the people using a single slot belay device know that its a single slot. Its a new idea, its fun, kinda hokey but whatever, it works and some people probably swear by it. No, it isn't a new idea. About 40+ years old, actually. Before the Sticht Plate, some climbers used a single link of 3/8" chain. THANKS I WILL MAKE SURE TO AMEND MY FUTURE STATEMENTS TO REFLECT THE TWO GUYZ THAT USED CHAINLINKZ MUCH CARE/LOVE GREGARIUS Quit being an ass. The Sticht Plate was also a single slot device and was the standard belay device for years. And a hell of a lot more than two guys used the chain links. If you're going to comment on climbing history, at least get it right. homey i dont know what crawled up your hex and died but what do you expect when you nitpick like a high school math teacher? I'll show my work and not just the answers from here on out, I promise!!11 This is a minor blip in the radar of climbing history. I know my climbing history, real history. White spider shit and stories from way back when before you were a curmudgeon. Don't try to pigeonhole me in with other young guys who don't know what they are talking about. I'm gonna have another beer, enjoy your internet nazi'sm. I'm sure its appreciated. Sure seemed pretty touchy to me, when you started "shouting. And, showing your work? In this case, would that be citing the books you scoured? Or the crags you saw this being done at (or not being done at, and extrapolating from there in that case?) I've read some of the stories from way back also. That doesn't make me an expert on the history of climbing. I happen to know some pieces of it however.
|
|
|
|
|
shoo
Aug 13, 2009, 2:50 PM
Post #79 of 104
(3177 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
Stop hijacking my thread, and get back to the topic at hand? Mad Lock - Mad Rock There was a reason Petzl discontinued this design. Though some may appreciate the versatility of a belay device that can magically turn into a knife, I think I'll stay away. And what's with this removable pin crap? I say hell no to the frankenreverso.
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Aug 13, 2009, 3:36 PM
Post #81 of 104
(3154 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
shoo wrote: Stop hijacking my thread, and get back to the topic at hand? Mad Lock - Mad Rock There was a reason Petzl discontinued this design. Though some may appreciate the versatility of a belay device that can magically turn into a knife, I think I'll stay away. And what's with this removable pin crap? I say hell no to the frankenreverso. Yeah - I looked at that when it was announced & decided I didn't want anything looking like that down in the area where belay devices are attached to the harness. And not for fear about the harness.
|
|
|
|
|
shoo
Aug 13, 2009, 8:02 PM
Post #82 of 104
(3093 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
Agreed. Added to the first page list.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Aug 16, 2009, 9:57 AM
Post #83 of 104
(3039 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
But the raveltik/ fixe version sounds like a good idea. Only you have to decide before you go on your climbing trip what kind of ropes you are going to use. If you are playing around with allen keys and stuff while at the crag youre probably going to loose them. But all these devices show one problem we are facing today: The range of ropes used is too wide! There are still places/ situations where 10.5 or even 11mm is a good choice, whereas on the other hand we are using sub 8mm doubles (or sub 9mm singles). so its either stick to one rope type, or carry multiple devices. (or try to reinvent the wheel, err ... belay device) qwert
|
|
|
|
|
shoo
Aug 17, 2009, 3:07 PM
Post #84 of 104
(2953 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 22, 2006
Posts: 1501
|
qwert wrote: But all these devices show one problem we are facing today: The range of ropes used is too wide! There are still places/ situations where 10.5 or even 11mm is a good choice, whereas on the other hand we are using sub 8mm doubles (or sub 9mm singles). so its either stick to one rope type, or carry multiple devices. (or try to reinvent the wheel, err ... belay device) qwert I disagree entirely. There are several very practical belay devices with advanced features out there that have shown to be very effective over a large range of ropes. The ATC-Guide and Reverso3 come immediately to mind. The problem with the two devices I listed that attempt to solve the multiple rope sizes issue is not that the issue is impossible to address practically. It is clearly possible. These are simply bad solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Aug 17, 2009, 4:20 PM
Post #85 of 104
(2930 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
I was frickin' bummed when I lost my pyramid. It was one of the few devices that had a "high friction mode" that didn't involve specifically ignoring all of the manufacturer diagrams. Plus, those cooling fins worked! Do a 200 foot rappel on dual 10.5s with a full pack, you'll notice the heat. If you have to do another after that, you want the device cool enough to use by the time you've pulled the ropes and threaded the next anchor. As far the ATC Sport, its a tool for a job. If you're not doing the job its designed for, you clearly don't need the tool. If all I did was climb in the gym, it would be a worthwhile investment. With the bionic 8, again, if you're not doing the job the tool is meant for, you clearly don't need it. And just because you deride the practitioners of a sport doesn't mean it is bad business for Mammut to cater to them. Would you rather that sport rappelers all use ATCs so we can't tell them apart? Or perhaps that canyoneers and cavers not have the option to go lighter with their equipment? No argument on the Mad Lock though. Just like the 1st and 2nd generation reverso before it, that idea sucked balls.
|
|
|
|
|
acer73
Aug 19, 2009, 3:35 AM
Post #86 of 104
(2849 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 20, 2008
Posts: 4
|
swaghole wrote: Wild Country VC Pro. Worst ever modern belay device. I bought while waiting for the reverso 3 to be available (and I'm a gear whore). I thought it would work well since it looked like the BD ATC XP and it was cheaper. I returned it to the store the next day. [image]http://www.wildcountry.co.uk/imgs/3791i2783.jpg[/image] I use belay device and it works flawlessly, my only complaint would be that the keeper cable needs to be a little beefier since i already nicked it. Some one said that the teeth don't make a difference. Maybe they work best on a 10.2 rope, there is defiantly a difference in holding power compared to the rounded side. In fact i can't use the teeth while rappelling because I have to feed in rope to descend. Also the $12 dollars i paid for it instead of $25 for the ATC-X was also nice.
|
|
|
|
|
robbovius
Aug 19, 2009, 3:49 PM
Post #87 of 104
(2804 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 8406
|
patto wrote: This Faders device is amoung the worst around. On fatter ropes at least belay is horrible. Stich plates are better. Or better yet for those on a budget go the ALDI device! http://www.aldi.com.au/...offers/2827_9045.htm LOL! I got one of those as a freebie from ACME climbing when I ordered a pair of shoes, way back in '03. yeah on any 10+mm rope it sucks major ass and feeds like the devils own shit. works the bomb on my 9.4 petzls tho.
(This post was edited by robbovius on Aug 19, 2009, 4:01 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
robdotcalm
Aug 24, 2009, 3:31 PM
Post #88 of 104
(2710 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027
|
Maldaly may have some comments on this, but as I recall it was Craig Luebben who first came up with the idea of putting flanges on a rappel device to dissipate heat. I had discussions with him as he developed the idea, which ultimately became the Pyramid. At that time, there had a been some rappelling accidents reported ANAM where the rappel device had heated up (in the sun, heavy loads, etc.) causing a decrease in the friction of the rope in the device and the climber losing control of the descent. Qualitatively, the flanges do increase heat dissipation. The question, Is this quantitatively significant? And that's not so easy to answer. Cheers, Rob.calm
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Aug 24, 2009, 6:49 PM
Post #89 of 104
(2677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
robdotcalm wrote: Maldaly may have some comments on this, but as I recall it was Craig Luebben who first came up with the idea of putting flanges on a rappel device to dissipate heat. I had discussions with him as he developed the idea, which ultimately became the Pyramid. At that time, there had a been some rappelling accidents reported ANAM where the rappel device had heated up (in the sun, heavy loads, etc.) causing a decrease in the friction of the rope in the device and the climber losing control of the descent. Qualitatively, the flanges do increase heat dissipation. The question, Is this quantitatively significant? And that's not so easy to answer. Cheers, Rob.calm It wouldn't be that difficult to test, although creating a control might be harder to accomplish. I mean, heat dissipation (or absorption) is a function of both surface area and total mass. As you increase surface area, dissipation increases, as you increase mass, dissipation decreases. So the question is, which dominates in that scenario? The more mass there is, the more energy it takes to heat it up (or to simplify the argument later, the longer it must be exposed to a heat source). However, the more mass there is, the longer it will take to cool. Similarly, the more surface area there is for cooling, the less time it will take to cool. Unfortunately, surface area isn't free. To clarify what Rob points out, those flanges add mass, so they increase the cooling time. But they also add surface area, so they decrease the cooling time. So does the additional surface area offset the additional mass. And I don't know that. It would be worthwhile to build a belay device (for testing purposes) with the same mass as the pyramid, but with a minimized exterior surface area, and compare the cooling times of the two after identical rappelling/lowering simulations.
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Aug 24, 2009, 7:00 PM
Post #90 of 104
(2671 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
petsfed wrote: It would be worthwhile to build a belay device (for testing purposes) with the same mass as the pyramid, but with a minimized exterior surface area, and compare the cooling times of the two after identical rappelling/lowering simulations. Why? I could see building one of the same core size (minus the cooling fins) to see what difference was incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Aug 24, 2009, 8:43 PM
Post #91 of 104
(2640 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
shockabuku wrote: petsfed wrote: It would be worthwhile to build a belay device (for testing purposes) with the same mass as the pyramid, but with a minimized exterior surface area, and compare the cooling times of the two after identical rappelling/lowering simulations. Why? I could see building one of the same core size (minus the cooling fins) to see what difference was incurred. Because the point is to test the overall effectiveness of the cooling fins, not just the theoretical effectiveness of the cooling fins. We want to know if the increased rate of cooling due to the added surface area of the fins is sufficiently large to offset the resistance to cooling caused by the additional mass. The only way to control for that is to create a belay device of identical mass but that minimizes the surface area. Otherwise, you'll introduce unequal heating rates as well, and your eventual data will be worthless. Basically, a pyramid without the added mass of the fins will heat faster, so we'd have a higher max temperature for the exact same rappel.
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Aug 25, 2009, 12:47 AM
Post #92 of 104
(2603 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
petsfed wrote: Because the point is to test the overall effectiveness of the cooling fins, not just the theoretical effectiveness of the cooling fins. We want to know if the increased rate of cooling due to the added surface area of the fins is sufficiently large to offset the resistance to cooling caused by the additional mass. The only way to control for that is to create a belay device of identical mass but that minimizes the surface area. Otherwise, you'll introduce unequal heating rates as well, and your eventual data will be worthless. Basically, a pyramid without the added mass of the fins will heat faster, so we'd have a higher max temperature for the exact same rappel. You cleary have little understanding of the physics involved here. Increased mass will always result in a lower peak temperature achieved. Increased surface area will always increase the rate of cooling and thus lower peak temperature. I think you'd find that the vast majority of the heat removed in a long rappell is through the rope. Given the energy levels involved, the low mass of the device and the short period of time your device woul be guaranteed to overheat if most of the heat ended up in it and it relied on air cooling. I can do the calculations for a fast 50m rappel: 80kg * 9.8m/s/s * 50m = 39200J 39200J / 50g / .9J/gK = 871K So your belay device would increase in temperature by 871C as you descend 50m. (when heat losses aren't considered and all energy ends up in the device) Instead most of the heat energy ends up spread over 50m of the rope. Sure some is lost on air cooling the device but it would be fairly low on a quick rappel.
(This post was edited by patto on Aug 25, 2009, 1:10 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
Carnage
Aug 25, 2009, 1:06 AM
Post #93 of 104
(2593 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 27, 2007
Posts: 923
|
patto wrote: ... I can do the calculations for a fast 50m rappel: 80kg * 9.8 * 50m = 39200 39200 / 50g / .9(J/gK) = 871K thats a fast rappel
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Aug 25, 2009, 1:09 AM
Post #94 of 104
(2589 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
Carnage wrote: patto wrote: ... I can do the calculations for a fast 50m rappel: 80kg * 9.8 * 50m = 39200 39200 / 50g / .9(J/gK) = 871K thats a fast rappel The calculations don't assume a rappel speed. Though for slower rappels obviously there is more time for the belay device to cool.
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Aug 25, 2009, 1:42 AM
Post #95 of 104
(2566 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
patto wrote: You cleary have little understanding of the physics involved here. Increased mass will always result in a lower peak temperature achieved. Increased surface area will always increase the rate of cooling and thus lower peak temperature. Lemme make sure I understand your argument here: By increasing the mass, we decrease the maximum temperature achieved. WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID IF YOU'D BOTHERED TO READ IT. I said that we can't simply compare a pyramid with fins to a pyramid without fins since a pyramid that simply lacks fins will have lower mass. And again, the issue is not of overall heat in the system, it is heat that remains in the device. And ANYBODY who says that a rappel device shouldn't heat up that much has NEVER done a 60m rappel on dual 10.5mm ropes, much less a fast rappel. Should I write out the energy in/energy out equations so you can see why a fast rappel would heat up the device faster than a slow rappel? Or can you work that out yourself? Edit: because this really pisses me off. Heat capacity is a measure of how much energy, per gram, it takes to heat a given material a single degree Kelvin. I'm not fucking stupid, I just doubted that our audience would necessarily know what I meant when I said that. So it should be pretty apparent that, all else being equal, a higher mass object will cool or heat slower than a lower mass object. But all else is NOT equal here. We're fiddling with the surface area AND the mass. So simple experimental design says that we should keep the mass constant to isolate the variable we are testing for, namely cooling due to increased surface area. Otherwise, how could we show that the device is or isn't cooling faster due to the fins, rather than due to the fact that the cooling and heating rates are also dependent on the temperature differential between source and sink?
(This post was edited by petsfed on Aug 25, 2009, 1:59 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Aug 25, 2009, 1:57 AM
Post #96 of 104
(2562 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
Alternatively lets try to figure out the percentage of heat that is lost via air cooling of the belay device. I'll assume 50W/m^2K for the cooling rate in air. Exposed surface area of ATC ~ 36cm^2 or 0.0036m^2 Temperature difference ~ 50K Time of rappell 30s 50W/m^2K *0.0036m^2 * 50K *30s = 270J So in the time it takes to rappel the device has lost to air only 270J out of a total 39200J! Wow. I am surprised that it is that low. Doubling the surface area with fins is unlikely to make much difference. Estimated 6C difference. Little point in the scheme of things. It is likely that when rappelling: A. A low percentage of energy ends up transferred to the belay device. B. The belay device loses most of its heat through conduction with rope. C. A very low percentage of heat is lost via air cooling. (discussion has not included the energy dissapated via belay carabiner, similar calculations in similar degree of magnitude can apply to the carabiner) The conclusion is that cooling fins on belay devices are next to useless. If you are overheating belay devices the slow down! (please feel free to point out any mathematical flaws)
|
|
|
|
|
climbdork
Aug 25, 2009, 2:00 AM
Post #97 of 104
(2557 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 13, 2007
Posts: 38
|
In reply to: 80kg * 9.8m/s/s * 50m = 39200J 9.8m/s^2 is free fall, not a "fast rappel."
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Aug 25, 2009, 2:05 AM
Post #98 of 104
(2555 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
petsfed wrote: Lemme make sure I understand your argument here: By increasing the mass, we decrease the maximum temperature achieved. WHICH IS PRECISELY WHAT I SAID IF YOU'D BOTHERED TO READ IT. I said that we can't simply compare a pyramid with fins to a pyramid without fins since a pyramid that simply lacks fins will have lower mass. And again, the issue is not of overall heat in the system, it is heat that remains in the device. And ANYBODY who says that a rappel device shouldn't heat up that much has NEVER done a 60m rappel on dual 10.5mm ropes, much less a fast rappel. Should I write out the energy in/energy out equations so you can see why a fast rappel would heat up the device faster than a slow rappel? Or can you work that out yourself? Calm down and take one of your happy pills petsfed. You said "We want to know if the increased rate of cooling due to the added surface area of the fins is sufficiently large to offset the resistance to cooling caused by the additional mass." This is completely false thinking. 'Resistance to cooling cause by additional mass' is not an issue. Either way the rest of my calculations weren't directed towards you. I did it as an exercise out of interest.
climbdork wrote: In reply to: 80kg * 9.8m/s/s * 50m = 39200J 9.8m/s^2 is free fall, not a "fast rappel." I'm calculating the potential energy dude. U=mgh http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_energy
(This post was edited by patto on Aug 25, 2009, 2:08 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Aug 25, 2009, 2:11 AM
Post #99 of 104
(2548 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
Well, for one, 30s for 165 feet is pretty bleedin' fast. I'd burn out a pair of gloves doing that. Still, it'd take a lot of time to have a major impact if the only time that the device was cooling was when it was on the rope. And furthermore, the question is not "does the device dissipate the heat put into the system?" but rather, "does it effectively dissipate the heat input into the device?" Your second calculation is meaningless because you ignore the most useful part of your first post, that the rope is the primary sink in the system. I actually wouldn't be that surprised if 300J was the difference between melting a sheath and not melting a sheath since there's a much larger amount of rope mass to deal with the rest.
(This post was edited by petsfed on Aug 25, 2009, 2:13 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
patto
Aug 25, 2009, 2:32 AM
Post #100 of 104
(2540 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 15, 2005
Posts: 1453
|
petsfed wrote: Well, for one, 30s for 165 feet is pretty bleedin' fast. I'd burn out a pair of gloves doing that. Yes it is fast. If you want you can double the speed so we get 540J. Still bloody low.
petsfed wrote: Still, it'd take a lot of time to have a major impact if the only time that the device was cooling was when it was on the rope. No it wouldn't. Conduction between solids transfers heat much faster that air (air is an excellend insulator). Since the rope is moving you have new cooler surfaces in contact all the time.
petsfed wrote: And furthermore, the question is not "does the device dissipate the heat put into the system?" but rather, "does it effectively dissipate the heat input into the device?" Your second calculation is meaningless because you ignore the most useful part of your first post, that the rope is the primary sink in the system. No the second calculation is not meaningless because it lets us understand the magnitude of the cooling due to air.
petsfed wrote: I actually wouldn't be that surprised if 300J was the difference between melting a sheath and not melting a sheath since there's a much larger amount of rope mass to deal with the rest. As I have said. 300J is 6.6C differnce. I would be VERY surprised if that becomes the difference between melteing sheath and not melting a sheath. If your 6.6C away from melting your sheath when you rappel you are doing something wrong!!
|
|
|
|
|
robdotcalm
Aug 25, 2009, 3:22 AM
Post #101 of 104
(1307 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027
|
If we're getting this precise, maybe the heat loss due to Stefan-Bolzmann radiation should be taken into account. Cheers, Rob.calm
|
|
|
|
|
FriendOfMonoPockets
Aug 25, 2009, 3:31 AM
Post #102 of 104
(1307 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 23, 2009
Posts: 36
|
jt512 wrote: RockLimbaugh wrote: [image]http://media.rei.com/media/606102.jpg[/image] That was completely predictable. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
petsfed
Aug 25, 2009, 6:40 PM
Post #103 of 104
(1273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 8599
|
patto wrote: Exposed surface area of ATC ~ 36cm^2 or 0.0036m^2 This was the other thing that was bugging me. We're talking about a pyramid, which is half again as long as an ATC, and has all of those extra cooling fins. Now, I'm not going to claim that that in and of itself is enough, just that if you go up to 50cm^2 for the unfinned pyramid and probably 2-3 times that for a finned pyramid, you'll be getting close to 10% of the heat generated by a rappel could, in principle, be radiated from the device during a moderately paced rappel (say 2 minutes for a 50m rappel, which still seems ludicrously fast on a 10.5, but possible on a 9.4mm or something smaller). Of course, this is back of the envelope type stuff. I think it would be more useful to actually run the tests with a variety of different devices and if there's a noticeable difference between them, then go the extra step and build a pyramid that has the extra mass but with a minimized exposed surface area. Also, point A. from the same post is technically accurate but not what we're concerned about. To generate an analogy, we don't care that the earth absorbs a very tiny fraction of what the sun radiates. We're just concerned with what the earth does with the energy it absorbs. Dig?
|
|
|
|
|
zeke_sf
Aug 25, 2009, 6:56 PM
Post #104 of 104
(1269 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2006
Posts: 18730
|
shoo wrote: Stop hijacking my thread, and get back to the topic at hand? Mad Lock - Mad Rock There was a reason Petzl discontinued this design. Though some may appreciate the versatility of a belay device that can magically turn into a knife, I think I'll stay away. And what's with this removable pin crap? I say hell no to the frankenreverso. Look, if you want things back on topic, why the hell are you posting pics of sex toys? For me, the worst device is the B-52 by Trango. I love the device -- smoothest ATC I've used -- but, damn, does that thing sharpen up. 'Course, I never owned the old Petzl Reverso, so I never really developed an affinity for the "sharp end".
|
|
|
|
|
|