|
agdavis
Jan 17, 2012, 4:25 AM
Post #1 of 66
(13555 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
Today my wife got her hair caught in her belay device on a free rappel. We were rapping off Moosedog Tower in J-Tree today, and the wind was a steady 30mph with gusts to about 70 mph. The wind blew her ponytail around and it got sucked into the belay device as she was coming down. Like a champ, dangling by her hair with no knife, she tore her hair chunk-by-chunk and managed to get it free. Definitely the craziest wind that I've ever climbed in (I'm from southern California). A pic for your viewing pleasure:
(This post was edited by agdavis on Jan 17, 2012, 4:27 AM)
|
Attachments:
|
photo (10).JPG
(135 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
robdotcalm
Jan 17, 2012, 4:37 AM
Post #2 of 66
(13547 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2002
Posts: 1027
|
Just curious. How was the belay device attached, e.g., clipped into the belay loop, extended by a sling, or in a different way? Congratulations to your wife for courage and competence in escaping. I'll bet this won't happen again to her and hopefully not to anybody reading your post. Thanks for writing this up. Rob.calm
|
|
|
|
|
agdavis
Jan 17, 2012, 4:50 AM
Post #3 of 66
(13535 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
robdotcalm wrote: Just curious. How was the belay device attached, e.g., clipped into the belay loop, extended by a sling, or in a different way? Congratulations to your wife for courage and competence in escaping. I'll bet this won't happen again to her and hopefully not to anybody reading your post. Thanks for writing this up. Rob.calm It was clipped to the belay loop. Another lesson learned: carrying a small pocket knife is mandatory.
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Jan 17, 2012, 5:05 AM
Post #4 of 66
(13524 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
Your wife is tough and resourceful and didn't panic under stress---good for her. But I'm not sure the lesson learned is to have a knife, because years ago someone in exactly the same position sliced through their harness and fell to their death. I think the lesson is to know how, under stress, to get your weight completely off the belay device so that hair or clothing can be extracted without having to cut anything.
|
|
|
|
|
agdavis
Jan 17, 2012, 5:13 AM
Post #5 of 66
(13511 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
rgold wrote: Your wife is tough and resourceful and didn't panic under stress---good for her. But I'm not sure the lesson learned is to have a knife, because years ago someone in exactly the same position sliced through their harness and fell to their death. I think the lesson is to know how, under stress, to get your weight completely off the belay device so that hair or clothing can be extracted without having to cut anything. I forgot to mention that the other lesson learned was to always wear her hair in a bun of some sort. And really, someone sliced through their harness? I would think that you would have to saw at it quite a bit to make that happen. What's your source for this story? As for taking the weight off the belay device, what would you recommend? Tie a prussik above the belay device with a long sling to step on? Even if she did that, I would think that it would be a very balancy move - especially when trying to get the hair out. If her foot would slip out of the sling, she would likely tear out a large chunk of her scalp. How would you do it?
|
|
|
|
|
jae8908
Jan 17, 2012, 5:23 AM
Post #6 of 66
(13505 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270
|
agdavis wrote: rgold wrote: Your wife is tough and resourceful and didn't panic under stress---good for her. But I'm not sure the lesson learned is to have a knife, because years ago someone in exactly the same position sliced through their harness and fell to their death. I think the lesson is to know how, under stress, to get your weight completely off the belay device so that hair or clothing can be extracted without having to cut anything. I forgot to mention that the other lesson learned was to always wear her hair in a bun of some sort. And really, someone sliced through their harness? I would think that you would have to saw at it quite a bit to make that happen. What's your source for this story? As for taking the weight off the belay device, what would you recommend? Tie a prussik above the belay device with a long sling to step on? Even if she did that, I would think that it would be a very balancy move - especially when trying to get the hair out. If her foot would slip out of the sling, she would likely tear out a large chunk of her scalp. How would you do it? depends on how sharp the knife is. I wouldn't go cutting on stuff that I couldn't see at more than 5 feet above the ground.
|
|
|
|
|
argos44
Jan 17, 2012, 6:24 AM
Post #7 of 66
(13483 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 17, 2012
Posts: 6
|
I would of thought maybe just pulling up on a prussik with one hand might release enough weight to free her hair. If not then standing on a prussik would be the option.
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Jan 17, 2012, 6:50 AM
Post #8 of 66
(13470 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
agdavis wrote: And really, someone sliced through their harness? I would think that you would have to saw at it quite a bit to make that happen. What's your source for this story? It happened a long time ago on the Maiden rappel, I think, and was reported in Summit magazine, and perhaps also the AAC accident report. The harness in question was just a "Swiss seat" tied from 1" webbing so was much easier to slice through then a modern harness, although folks who extend their device from the harness would have an analogously vulnerable connection, and certain parts of most harnesses---the webbing that actually goes through the buckle for example---is also easy to cut. Also, I don't know about hair, but you can get clothing into the belay device and cutting it won't free the rappel---you have to unweight the device and remove the clothing in order to continue down.
agdavis wrote: As for taking the weight off the belay device, what would you recommend? Tie a prussik above the belay device with a long sling to step on? Even if she did that, I would think that it would be a very balancy move - especially when trying to get the hair out. If her foot would slip out of the sling, she would likely tear out a large chunk of her scalp. How would you do it? What you said, but also clip a quickdraw to the high prussik. Stand up in the sling and clip the draw to the harness belay loop so that you are now hanging in your harness from the prussik with the device unweighted.
|
|
|
|
|
bearbreeder
Jan 17, 2012, 7:21 AM
Post #9 of 66
(13458 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
ive had a partner get their (non ponytail) hair stuck as well, luckily she managed to get it out my suggestion would be for you to give a firemans to her if you can, and then she can take a bit more time .... a prussik may be in order ... or at least know how to tie off the belay device and work from there
(This post was edited by bearbreeder on Jan 17, 2012, 7:23 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
naitch
Jan 17, 2012, 12:23 PM
Post #10 of 66
(13423 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: 539
|
About 10 years I was climbing with my son and he was rapping off a sport climb and got his long hair caught in the belay device when bending over looking down for a moment during the rap. He didn't have a knife and was in so much pain and agony that he gradually pulled out his hair by the roots. Ended up with a small bald patch. Painful way to learn a lesson. Lessons learned: carry a knife, carry a prussic, and extend the belay/rap device. ...and to get a haircut or keep the hair out of the way.
(This post was edited by naitch on Jan 17, 2012, 1:16 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 20, 2012, 9:50 PM
Post #11 of 66
(13185 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
naitch wrote: About 10 years I was climbing with my son and he was rapping off a sport climb and got his long hair caught in the belay device when bending over looking down for a moment during the rap. He didn't have a knife and was in so much pain and agony that he gradually pulled out his hair by the roots. Ended up with a small bald patch. Painful way to learn a lesson. Lessons learned: carry a knife, carry a prussic, and extend the belay/rap device. ...and to get a haircut or keep the hair out of the way. The best lesson here might be to lower on sport pitches, but take what you want from this.
|
|
|
|
|
naitch
Jan 20, 2012, 10:30 PM
Post #12 of 66
(13163 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: 539
|
Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors...
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 20, 2012, 10:38 PM
Post #13 of 66
(13158 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb?
|
|
|
|
|
damienclimber
Jan 20, 2012, 10:48 PM
Post #14 of 66
(13151 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 13, 2011
Posts: 313
|
agdavis wrote: Today my wife got her hair caught in her belay device on a free rappel. We were rapping off Moosedog Tower in J-Tree today, and the wind was a steady 30mph with gusts to about 70 mph. The wind blew her ponytail around and it got sucked into the belay device as she was coming down. Like a champ, dangling by her hair with no knife, she tore her hair chunk-by-chunk and managed to get it free. Definitely the craziest wind that I've ever climbed in (I'm from southern California). A pic for your viewing pleasure: [image]http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=6133;[/image] It was all your fault ! I hope your wife finds a better climbing partner next time.
|
|
|
|
|
soNVclimbing
Jan 20, 2012, 10:59 PM
Post #15 of 66
(13141 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2009
Posts: 40
|
a good rule for riding zip lines, tyroly's or while rappelling is to keep your hair tucked up under your hat and your shirt/coat tucked into your pants.
|
|
|
|
|
naitch
Jan 20, 2012, 11:51 PM
Post #16 of 66
(13116 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: 539
|
shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? Franklin WV. At lot of the climb have shuts that are wearing from that very reason.
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 20, 2012, 11:56 PM
Post #17 of 66
(13111 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? And what exactly do you think shuts are for? Closed shuts are the worst hardware that could possibly be used for an anchor. Open shuts only have the benefit of convenience. Using the wrong hardware is no reason to encourage a rap first ethic in sport climbing. Franklin WV. At lot of the climb have shuts that are wearing from that very reason.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Jan 21, 2012, 12:02 AM
Post #18 of 66
(13108 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Having done that myself, I would just like to say...HAHA!!
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jan 21, 2012, 12:38 AM
Post #19 of 66
(13091 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
notapplicable wrote: Having done that myself, I would just like to say...HAHA!! Cut your hair ya damn hippy.
|
|
|
|
|
agdavis
Jan 21, 2012, 1:34 AM
Post #21 of 66
(13052 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route.
(This post was edited by agdavis on Jan 21, 2012, 1:38 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
naitch
Jan 21, 2012, 2:36 AM
Post #22 of 66
(13036 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: 539
|
shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? And what exactly do you think shuts are for? Closed shuts are the worst hardware that could possibly be used for an anchor. Open shuts only have the benefit of convenience. Using the wrong hardware is no reason to encourage a rap first ethic in sport climbing. Franklin WV. At lot of the climb have shuts that are wearing from that very reason. Closed shuts are found throughout the area. People have different opinions about rethreading and being lowered vs. rethreading and rapping. Both to preserve what's there and because of having a trad background, we chose/choose to rap instead.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jan 21, 2012, 3:14 AM
Post #23 of 66
(13016 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jan 21, 2012, 3:22 AM
Post #24 of 66
(13006 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
Well, it is MooseCock tower, the descent is a rap. Several years ago we had a gang on the alcove swing, taking turns, chillin in the shade. One guy flies out there, and on the lower got his short beard stuck in his grigri. THe thing couldn't have been more than an inch long at the outside, but it sucked his face right into the grigri! HE was crying in pain as well as you can when there's a grigri in your mouth while the rest of us died laughing. He eventually made it down, but it fully ripped out a patch of beard the size of a nickle.
|
|
|
|
|
seniormoose
Jan 21, 2012, 4:07 AM
Post #25 of 66
(12984 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2011
Posts: 24
|
I cary a wrapped razor blade.
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 21, 2012, 3:42 PM
Post #26 of 66
(4376 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? And what exactly do you think shuts are for? Closed shuts are the worst hardware that could possibly be used for an anchor. Open shuts only have the benefit of convenience. Using the wrong hardware is no reason to encourage a rap first ethic in sport climbing. Franklin WV. At lot of the climb have shuts that are wearing from that very reason. Closed shuts are found throughout the area. People have different opinions about rethreading and being lowered vs. rethreading and rapping. Both to preserve what's there and because of having a trad background, we chose/choose to rap instead. Choosing to rap versus saying closed shuts were installed with the intent to rap are two really different statements. If the anchors are worn, they should be fixed. With all due respect to your background, that is sport climbing's view on fixed gear.
|
|
|
|
|
naitch
Jan 21, 2012, 3:54 PM
Post #27 of 66
(4369 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2002
Posts: 539
|
shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? And what exactly do you think shuts are for? Closed shuts are the worst hardware that could possibly be used for an anchor. Open shuts only have the benefit of convenience. Using the wrong hardware is no reason to encourage a rap first ethic in sport climbing. Franklin WV. At lot of the climb have shuts that are wearing from that very reason. Closed shuts are found throughout the area. People have different opinions about rethreading and being lowered vs. rethreading and rapping. Both to preserve what's there and because of having a trad background, we chose/choose to rap instead. Choosing to rap versus saying closed shuts were installed with the intent to rap are two really different statements. If the anchors are worn, they should be fixed. With all due respect to your background, that is sport climbing's view on fixed gear. I don't pretend to know the intent of the person who bolted the route. I'm just sharing our rationale and that of the person who introduced us to the area and those we climb with.
|
|
|
|
|
jae8908
Jan 21, 2012, 4:11 PM
Post #28 of 66
(4365 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 15, 2011
Posts: 270
|
naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? And what exactly do you think shuts are for? Closed shuts are the worst hardware that could possibly be used for an anchor. Open shuts only have the benefit of convenience. Using the wrong hardware is no reason to encourage a rap first ethic in sport climbing. Franklin WV. At lot of the climb have shuts that are wearing from that very reason. Closed shuts are found throughout the area. People have different opinions about rethreading and being lowered vs. rethreading and rapping. Both to preserve what's there and because of having a trad background, we chose/choose to rap instead. Choosing to rap versus saying closed shuts were installed with the intent to rap are two really different statements. If the anchors are worn, they should be fixed. With all due respect to your background, that is sport climbing's view on fixed gear. I don't pretend to know the intent of the person who bolted the route. I'm just sharing our rationale and that of the person who introduced us to the area and those we climb with. I and everyone that I climb with rappels off instead of lowering as well. If you have to rethread the rope anyway, why not save the permanent gear at the top? It makes them last longer and people don't have to take time and effort to replace them as often. Therefore I agree with naitch.
|
|
|
|
|
agdavis
Jan 21, 2012, 4:51 PM
Post #29 of 66
(4353 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness?
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Jan 21, 2012, 5:02 PM
Post #30 of 66
(4348 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. What whole are you looking at? I think you are categorically incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Jan 21, 2012, 5:06 PM
Post #31 of 66
(4342 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now.
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 21, 2012, 5:16 PM
Post #32 of 66
(4339 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? http://www.redriverclimbing.com/...pe=route&id=1114 Rappell that? Lowering is for safety, not convenience.
|
|
|
|
|
agdavis
Jan 21, 2012, 5:25 PM
Post #33 of 66
(4336 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
shotwell wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? http://www.redriverclimbing.com/...pe=route&id=1114 Rappell that? Lowering is for safety, not convenience. Why wouldn't you rap that? Maybe it isn't obvious from the picture, but it looks fine..
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 21, 2012, 5:30 PM
Post #34 of 66
(4334 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? http://www.redriverclimbing.com/...pe=route&id=1114 Rappell that? Lowering is for safety, not convenience. Why wouldn't you rap that? Maybe it isn't obvious from the picture, but it looks fine.. Why don't you go try it and report back? The reason is that the route is 80 feet long and so overhung you turn around and look straight out to belay. You will not clean it on rappell.
|
|
|
|
|
olderic
Jan 21, 2012, 5:45 PM
Post #35 of 66
(4330 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 17, 2003
Posts: 1539
|
shotwell wrote: The reason is that the route is 80 feet long and so overhung you turn around and look straight out to belay. You will not clean it on rappell. Where has cleaning been mentioned prior to this in this thread? This argument has been going on for at least 20 years. Same predictable back and forth every time. Lowering is statistically safer - even though it gets screwed up in a regular basis. Lowering will wear out the gear (including YOUR rope - but not to any significant degree) faster. It may also kink your rope. It will help a lot of you are trying to clean the route and its overhanging. Often times route are equipped with anchors that are easily replaceable when worn. But there is no doubt that recommending it is also contributing to the dumbing down of climbing which after all is what sport climbing (and to a great extent this site) is all about. Now the expected responses should include the words "trad" "obsolete", "dinosaur" and the like, blah blah blah. Come up with something new - should the compressor have been chopped - wait - that one is 40 years old.
|
|
|
|
|
agdavis
Jan 21, 2012, 5:54 PM
Post #36 of 66
(4329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 7, 2009
Posts: 310
|
shotwell wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? http://www.redriverclimbing.com/...pe=route&id=1114 Rappell that? Lowering is for safety, not convenience. Why wouldn't you rap that? Maybe it isn't obvious from the picture, but it looks fine.. Why don't you go try it and report back? The reason is that the route is 80 feet long and so overhung you turn around and look straight out to belay. You will not clean it on rappell. Then that's definitely the exception and not the rule.
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 21, 2012, 5:55 PM
Post #37 of 66
(4329 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
olderic wrote: shotwell wrote: The reason is that the route is 80 feet long and so overhung you turn around and look straight out to belay. You will not clean it on rappell. Where has cleaning been mentioned prior to this in this thread? This argument has been going on for at least 20 years. Same predictable back and forth every time. Lowering is statistically safer - even though it gets screwed up in a regular basis. Lowering will wear out the gear (including YOUR rope - but not to any significant degree) faster. It may also kink your rope. It will help a lot of you are trying to clean the route and its overhanging. Often times route are equipped with anchors that are easily replaceable when worn. But there is no doubt that recommending it is also contributing to the dumbing down of climbing which after all is what sport climbing (and to a great extent this site) is all about. Now the expected responses should include the words "trad" "obsolete", "dinosaur" and the like, blah blah blah. Come up with something new - should the compressor have been chopped - wait - that one is 40 years old. Put your glasses on gramps, I originally responded to a post about a similar accident while cleaning a sport pitch. Furthermore, lowering is not dumbing down the sport, it is the logical way to clean a single pitch climb. Bringing multipitch tactics to single pitch sport climbs does not make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 21, 2012, 5:57 PM
Post #38 of 66
(4328 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? http://www.redriverclimbing.com/...pe=route&id=1114 Rappell that? Lowering is for safety, not convenience. Why wouldn't you rap that? Maybe it isn't obvious from the picture, but it looks fine.. Why don't you go try it and report back? The reason is that the route is 80 feet long and so overhung you turn around and look straight out to belay. You will not clean it on rappell. Then that's definitely the exception and not the rule. In sport climbing? Wrong again.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jan 21, 2012, 7:07 PM
Post #39 of 66
(4317 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? It's not laziness. It's speed, safety, and convenience; and it's what the anchor is for. Ask the guy who installed the anchors what they're for. Read what the guidebook says they're for. I know most of the local sport crag developers pretty well, and they shake their heads in bewilderment whenever they see you n00bs rapping "to save the anchors." If and when the anchors get worn, you replace them. Just like you replace your draws when they get worn. What are you going to do if you ever get strong enough to climb a route too steep to rap off of—you know, a real sport route. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Jan 21, 2012, 7:18 PM
Post #40 of 66
(4316 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
caughtinside wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now. It's a combination of traditude and gumbitude. At any of the SoCal areas that have become (eg, NJC), or have always been (eg, Holcomb Valley), dominated by gumbies, you see mostly save-the-anchor rappelling. At the crags where the pros climb, hardly anyone ever raps. Can you imagine rapping the harder routes at that place where you're rumored to have flashed the warm-up? "Save the anchors" is the new gumby meme. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Jan 21, 2012, 7:33 PM
Post #41 of 66
(4312 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
jt512 wrote: caughtinside wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now. It's a combination of traditude and gumbitude. At any of the SoCal areas that have become (eg, NJC), or have always been (eg, Holcomb Valley), dominated by gumbies, you see mostly save-the-anchor rappelling. At the crags where the pros climb, hardly anyone ever raps. Can you imagine rapping the harder routes at that place where you're rumored to have flashed the warm-up? "Save the anchors" is the new gumby meme. Jay It seems that they are rapidly approaching extinction based on the proposed level of protection.
|
|
|
|
|
crjanow
Jan 24, 2012, 1:21 AM
Post #42 of 66
(4219 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 18, 2008
Posts: 69
|
when i saw the title for this thread i thought they were only wearing their harness
|
|
|
|
|
miles1776
Jan 24, 2012, 4:36 PM
Post #44 of 66
(4189 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 29, 2008
Posts: 11
|
I ALWAYS lower. Since when is safety, especially in an already dangerous sport worth less than the gear? the gear can be replaced, thats what it's for. You make a mistake 80 ft off the ground trying to set up to rap (And I've seen it happen) and it's your life. Are those anchors worth more than your life? When they are worn they should get replaced.
|
|
|
|
|
avalon420
Jan 26, 2012, 5:51 AM
Post #45 of 66
(4126 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2005
Posts: 281
|
rgold wrote: Your wife is tough and resourceful and didn't panic under stress---good for her. But I'm not sure the lesson learned is to have a knife, because years ago someone in exactly the same position sliced through their harness and fell to their death. I think the lesson is to know how, under stress, to get your weight completely off the belay device so that hair or clothing can be extracted without having to cut anything. yeah, seriously. I don't even climb w/ people who bring knives on route. Scares the shit it of me. My wife (girl friend @ the time) had this happen on her first day out & first ever rap. I was right beside her for LEARNING purposes & freed her up with a prussik. Moral of the story, EDUCATION &PREPAREDNESS will save your life, but KNIVES WILL KILL YOU.
|
|
|
|
|
lkeegan
Jan 26, 2012, 6:35 AM
Post #46 of 66
(4125 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2009
Posts: 54
|
I've had this happen to me a couple of times now. I have long hair, even in a pony tail and if I want to wear a helmet there are very few options for how I can wear my hair: down or in a low pony tail. Both lend themselves to getting sucked into a grigri. Once I was belaying and it got sucked into the climber end of a grigri and my climber just unweighted the rope and all was fine. The other time I fell low down on a route and my belayer got pulled up and my hair got sucked into the BRAKE end of the grigri and my belayer wasn't on the ground and the climb was overhanging so I was no where near the rock. I had to climb on a friend of mine to lower my belayer to the ground without sending rope through the grigri. It huuuurrrrrttt. Also, don't ask me how my hair went into the break end. I have no clue how that happened.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Jan 27, 2012, 12:16 AM
Post #47 of 66
(4083 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
lkeegan wrote: I've had this happen to me a couple of times now. I have long hair, even in a pony tail and if I want to wear a helmet there are very few options for how I can wear my hair: down or in a low pony tail. Both lend themselves to getting sucked into a grigri. Once I was belaying and it got sucked into the climber end of a grigri and my climber just unweighted the rope and all was fine. The other time I fell low down on a route and my belayer got pulled up and my hair got sucked into the BRAKE end of the grigri and my belayer wasn't on the ground and the climb was overhanging so I was no where near the rock. I had to climb on a friend of mine to lower my belayer to the ground without sending rope through the grigri. It huuuurrrrrttt. Also, don't ask me how my hair went into the break end. I have no clue how that happened. After a couple of times, I'd get my freaking hair cut or find a new sport.
|
|
|
|
|
Kartessa
Jan 27, 2012, 12:44 AM
Post #48 of 66
(4078 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 18, 2008
Posts: 7362
|
There are 2 really easy fixes for your problem: 1. Get one of those fancy helmets for a high ponytail. Or 2. Braid your hair. **holy shit! 2 constructive suggestions in 1 post!** I promise it won't happen again. Sorry RC.com
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Jan 27, 2012, 1:01 AM
Post #49 of 66
(4064 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Kartessa wrote: There are 2 really easy fixes for your problem: 1. Get one of those fancy helmets for a high ponytail. Or 2. Braid your hair. **holy shit! 2 constructive suggestions in 1 post!** I promise it won't happen again. Sorry RC.com Or a quick messy bun.
|
|
|
|
|
avalon420
Jan 27, 2012, 3:29 AM
Post #50 of 66
(4053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2005
Posts: 281
|
Kartessa wrote: There are 2 really easy fixes for your problem: 1. Get one of those fancy helmets for a high ponytail. Or 2. Braid your hair. **holy shit! 2 constructive suggestions in 1 post!** I promise it won't happen again. Sorry RC.com Oh, here's one more, carry a couple hair thingys on your chalk bags draw strings. I promise, if her/his n00b locks are hanging free when you leave the car then you can usually rest assured that they didn't bring hair thingy. plus brownie points for being considerate, forward thinking male.
|
|
|
|
|
avalon420
Jan 27, 2012, 3:35 AM
Post #51 of 66
(2653 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 1, 2005
Posts: 281
|
Also, hair thingys make decency keeper loops for stacked nuts , or mid rout makeshift ____ ring ;)
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Jan 27, 2012, 5:18 AM
Post #52 of 66
(2633 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Rap or lower, funny to see this is still an argument. I've develop quite a lot of single pitch sport routes over the last decade. In the U.S., CHina, Japan, Europe, and Indonesia. When I use chain at the belay station, I know that future climbers will use those chains to lower off the route. I usually add three or four extra links so tht when the bottom link wears out, the lowest link can be cut and the next link up becomes the lower off link. When I use various other smooth and round, like shuts, I expect and predict people will lower off. If for some reason I don't want, or don't think people will lower off, like some of the multi-pitch or big wall routes I've out up that needed belay stations, I use something like the Metolius rap ring. While I expect and think most people will lower when they climb sport routes I put up, I know some will rap it for some reason. To me, on sport routes, lowering seems safer, faster, and more convenient, especially if I have to remove draws from leading the route on the way down.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Jan 27, 2012, 4:46 PM
Post #53 of 66
(2619 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
avalon420 wrote: rgold wrote: Your wife is tough and resourceful and didn't panic under stress---good for her. But I'm not sure the lesson learned is to have a knife, because years ago someone in exactly the same position sliced through their harness and fell to their death. I think the lesson is to know how, under stress, to get your weight completely off the belay device so that hair or clothing can be extracted without having to cut anything. yeah, seriously. I don't even climb w/ people who bring knives on route. Scares the shit it of me. My wife (girl friend @ the time) had this happen on her first day out & first ever rap. I was right beside her for LEARNING purposes & freed her up with a prussik. Moral of the story, EDUCATION &PREPAREDNESS will save your life, but KNIVES WILL KILL YOU. Thats funny, I could probably count on one hand the number of routes I haven't carried a knife on and so far no one has been murdered. Unless you count orange peel, flappers and old tat...
|
|
|
|
|
majid_sabet
Jan 27, 2012, 6:10 PM
Post #54 of 66
(2604 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390
|
she must be very hot looking now
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Jan 28, 2012, 1:43 PM
Post #55 of 66
(2581 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
I often carry a knife in the pocket of my chalk bag on long mult-pitch routes or other routes that have sling tied off for the rappels. Just makes life easier of you have to change out the webbing. On sport routes, my pocketknife tend to stay in my pack.
|
|
|
|
|
rgold
Jan 28, 2012, 5:11 PM
Post #56 of 66
(2556 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2002
Posts: 1804
|
My comment about knives was meant to suggest that slashing away at something, hair or clothing, caught in a rappel device carries with it the danger of accidentally cutting a critical connecting link. I was not suggesting, and certainly do not believe, that knives themselves have to be avoided. Personally, I have a chalk bag with a zipper pocket and a small knife and two prussik loops liver there permanently. None of these items sees much action, although a few years ago I actually needed them all to rescue an inexperienced person who had gotten jammed on a rappel. The knife comes out periodically, if not frequently, for cutting down tat.
|
|
|
|
|
barleywino
Feb 14, 2012, 12:35 AM
Post #57 of 66
(2471 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 4, 2011
Posts: 50
|
climbers with short hair are also not immune to this. years ago i was rappelling the New River Gorge bridge and wouldn't you know it, got my (short hair, under a helmet) caught in my rap device (a rappel rack). could happen also if you extend your ATC or other rap device. Re knives, note that knives that do not lock shut are susceptible to opening on their own volition. the one time i carried a knife clipped to my harness gear loop, i looked down at one point and saw it partially open. would not have been fun to reach down for some gear and have the knife close on my fingers.
|
|
|
|
|
Traches
Feb 14, 2012, 1:43 AM
Post #58 of 66
(2455 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 26, 2012
Posts: 83
|
barleywino wrote: climbers with short hair are also not immune to this. years ago i was rappelling the New River Gorge bridge and wouldn't you know it, got my (short hair, under a helmet) caught in my rap device (a rappel rack). could happen also if you extend your ATC or other rap device. Re knives, note that knives that do not lock shut are susceptible to opening on their own volition. the one time i carried a knife clipped to my harness gear loop, i looked down at one point and saw it partially open. would not have been fun to reach down for some gear and have the knife close on my fingers. Truly short hair wouldn't be long enough to get caught even if you tried, so I have to question your use of the description.
|
|
|
|
|
barleywino
Feb 14, 2012, 1:50 AM
Post #59 of 66
(2448 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 4, 2011
Posts: 50
|
let me clarify: my hair came down to about an inch above my eyebrows. no ponytails. i didn't believe it could happen until it did. fortunately it pulled right out of my head before I could even react. a reminder to not be too complacent.
(This post was edited by barleywino on Feb 14, 2012, 1:51 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
sherpa79
Feb 14, 2012, 1:21 PM
Post #60 of 66
(2409 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 108
|
Traches wrote: Truly short hair wouldn't be long enough to get caught even if you tried, so I have to question your use of the description. Beard hair dude. Beard hair.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 14, 2012, 5:12 PM
Post #61 of 66
(2368 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
jt512 wrote: caughtinside wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now. It's a combination of traditude and gumbitude. At any of the SoCal areas that have become (eg, NJC), or have always been (eg, Holcomb Valley), dominated by gumbies, you see mostly save-the-anchor rappelling. At the crags where the pros climb, hardly anyone ever raps. Can you imagine rapping the harder routes at that place where you're rumored to have flashed the warm-up? "Save the anchors" is the new gumby meme. Jay I don't disagree with your basic argument (that most routes at most modern sport crags routes are set up for the last person to lower) but your stance on it does make me chuckle. I wonder how many years until you're the "gumby", and your own line gets used about you? A time when all the new climbers are saying "But the anchors are there for toproping through. Why should we put our own gear on them? You don't like us TRing through the chains all day? Too bad old man!" G
|
|
|
|
|
shotwell
Feb 14, 2012, 5:37 PM
Post #62 of 66
(2363 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 6, 2009
Posts: 366
|
cracklover wrote: jt512 wrote: caughtinside wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now. It's a combination of traditude and gumbitude. At any of the SoCal areas that have become (eg, NJC), or have always been (eg, Holcomb Valley), dominated by gumbies, you see mostly save-the-anchor rappelling. At the crags where the pros climb, hardly anyone ever raps. Can you imagine rapping the harder routes at that place where you're rumored to have flashed the warm-up? "Save the anchors" is the new gumby meme. Jay I don't disagree with your basic argument (that most routes at most modern sport crags routes are set up for the last person to lower) but your stance on it does make me chuckle. I wonder how many years until you're the "gumby", and your own line gets used about you? A time when all the new climbers are saying "But the anchors are there for toproping through. Why should we put our own gear on them? You don't like us TRing through the chains all day? Too bad old man!" G Presumably, that would be at a time when route developers install hardware with the expectation that people will toprope through the anchors. However, this isn't likely to affect Jay (or other experienced sport climbers) much. Toproping noobs aren't even climbing on the warm ups for most sport climbers. With the notable exceptions of Shelf Road, Smith Rock, and a few other old school areas, top roping sport climbs of even a moderate difficulty is not feasible. Also, why would Jay care if the ethic shifted to letting gumbies toprope through the chains? I care, currently, because I help to maintain anchor hardware. If more people are willing to pony up for the sake of convenience, why not let them? The only reason that sport climbing anchors are considered disposable is because sport climbers are willing to maintain them at their current level of use.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Feb 14, 2012, 9:24 PM
Post #63 of 66
(2334 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
cracklover wrote: jt512 wrote: caughtinside wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now. It's a combination of traditude and gumbitude. At any of the SoCal areas that have become (eg, NJC), or have always been (eg, Holcomb Valley), dominated by gumbies, you see mostly save-the-anchor rappelling. At the crags where the pros climb, hardly anyone ever raps. Can you imagine rapping the harder routes at that place where you're rumored to have flashed the warm-up? "Save the anchors" is the new gumby meme. Jay I don't disagree with your basic argument (that most routes at most modern sport crags routes are set up for the last person to lower) but your stance on it does make me chuckle. I wonder how many years until you're the "gumby", and your own line gets used about you? A time when all the new climbers are saying "But the anchors are there for toproping through. Why should we put our own gear on them? You don't like us TRing through the chains all day? Too bad old man!" G I don't get. Your post doesn't make sense to me for four reasons. First, the trend is in the opposite direction: n00bs are becoming more fixated on "saving the anchors"; not less. Second, the anchors are intended for lowering, and not, for the most part, for TRing. Third, if in the future some new generation of anchors is intended for toproping, I'll be one of the first to toprope through them. As it is, I occasionally take a TR burn through the anchors, anyway, and I don't think it's a crime. Fourth (or maybe first), what does TRing through the anchors have to do with the "controversy" I was addressing—rapping vs. lowering—anyway? Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Feb 14, 2012, 9:30 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Feb 14, 2012, 9:44 PM
Post #64 of 66
(2327 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
jt512 wrote: cracklover wrote: jt512 wrote: caughtinside wrote: agdavis wrote: jt512 wrote: agdavis wrote: shotwell wrote: naitch wrote: Except for the fact that the last person has to clean and rap. Where we climb we don't lower through the anchors... Incredibly uncommon for sport climbing. I personally assume that any sport pitch is bolted with the expectation that the. last climber will lower. I also contribute sacrificial gear to anchors for this reason. If you don't mind me asking, where do you climb? While there isn't much black and white in climbing, I must say that when looking at United States climbing as a whole that you are categorically incorrect. Chains are for rapping, not lowering (and also not for building your anchor). Lowering off of chains not only causes premature wear but also creates the incentive for others to do the same. While it might be tempting to lower because you don't have to thread half the rope as you do when rapping, show some respect to the route. No, you're wrong. At almost any sport area, you can lower off whatever anchors there are, including chains. Chains are pretty common sport anchors in the US. You can lower through them. Jay Why would you ruin fixed gear out of sheer laziness? I think I've probably seen this trattitude on the internet at least 1000 times now. It's a combination of traditude and gumbitude. At any of the SoCal areas that have become (eg, NJC), or have always been (eg, Holcomb Valley), dominated by gumbies, you see mostly save-the-anchor rappelling. At the crags where the pros climb, hardly anyone ever raps. Can you imagine rapping the harder routes at that place where you're rumored to have flashed the warm-up? "Save the anchors" is the new gumby meme. Jay I don't disagree with your basic argument (that most routes at most modern sport crags routes are set up for the last person to lower) but your stance on it does make me chuckle. I wonder how many years until you're the "gumby", and your own line gets used about you? A time when all the new climbers are saying "But the anchors are there for toproping through. Why should we put our own gear on them? You don't like us TRing through the chains all day? Too bad old man!" G I don't get. Your post doesn't make sense to me for four reasons. First, the trend is in the opposite direction: n00bs are becoming more fixated on "saving the anchors"; not less. Second, the anchors are intended for lowering, and not, for the most part, for TRing. Third, if in the future some new generation of anchors is intended for toproping, I'll be one of the first to toprope through them. As it is, I occasionally take a TR burn through the anchors, anyway, and I don't think it's a crime. Fourth (or maybe first), what does TRing through the anchors have to do with the "controversy" I was addressing—rapping vs. lowering—anyway? Jay I was riffing about how the trend is more towards convenience and less towards saving the anchor hardware. So I simply took it the next logical step, and imagined the resulting controversy. GO
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Feb 14, 2012, 10:15 PM
Post #65 of 66
(2322 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
cracklover wrote: I was riffing about how the trend is more towards convenience and less towards saving the anchor hardware. So I simply took it the next logical step, and imagined the resulting controversy. GO Is the trend toward convenience? N00bs are becoming increasingly fixated on "saving" the anchors. Well-bolted cracks (like the one below) are being "greenpointed." And old convenience anchors at trad areas are being chopped faster than new ones are being installed. I don't see the trend you are referring to. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
shockabuku
Feb 15, 2012, 2:10 AM
Post #66 of 66
(2305 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868
|
jt512 wrote: if in the future some new generation of anchors is intended for toproping, I'll be one of the first to toprope through them. As it is, I occasionally take a TR burn through the anchors, anyway, and I don't think it's a crime. Fourth (or maybe first), what does TRing through the anchors have to do with the "controversy" I was addressing—rapping vs. lowering—anyway? Jay SCANDAL!
|
|
|
|
|
|