|
wjca
Nov 13, 2006, 3:37 PM
Post #1 of 76
(3116 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545
|
It looks just like dropzone, but with no nude pictures section. WTF?
|
|
|
|
|
epic_ed
Nov 13, 2006, 3:47 PM
Post #2 of 76
(3090 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 4724
|
Your feedback is too warm & fuzzy -- could you tone it down a bit and speak from the heart? 
It's an adjustment -- you'll make it. Utter and complete coincidence that it looks anything like DropZone.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
redpointron
Nov 13, 2006, 3:47 PM
Post #3 of 76
(3090 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 1170
|
i miss the monkey...
but i like this guy...
regards.
r.r.
|
|
|
|
|
fenix83
Moderator
Nov 13, 2006, 3:49 PM
Post #4 of 76
(3085 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: 2397
|
Look closer... NSFW tag means some amount of "nudity of adult content" is expected.
Be careful though, there is a fine line between nudity and porn...
Now do you like it better?
-F
|
|
|
|
|
traddad
Nov 13, 2006, 3:52 PM
Post #5 of 76
(3072 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2001
Posts: 7129
|
It's so....sterile.
Kinda like something you'd see as a platform for a library card catalog.
|
|
|
|
|
lena_chita
Moderator
Nov 13, 2006, 3:53 PM
Post #6 of 76
(3071 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087
|
Yeah, I don't like it either. The pictures on the front page look so much smaller and with less resolution. the colors, the headings, the way the threads look, everything feels "wrong"...
BUT-- can you do a better job? B/c I can't for sure... People who worked on this spent a lot of time and effort, somehting *I* wasn't able to contribute, so I'll sit back and try to accept things 
ANd to be fair, some of this is simply stuff that takes getting used to, and once you are used to it, it will start feeling "right".
|
|
|
|
|
redlegrangerone
Nov 13, 2006, 3:59 PM
Post #7 of 76
(3057 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 851
|
A couple things I like. The routes database is much easier to navigate. The general layout looks easier.
A couple things I do not like. Changing your profile picture is hard to do. The photo resolution is terrible.
But it is still early in the process.
I noticed also, there is an option for adult content. Who knows what this will lead to.
|
|
|
|
|
lagarita
Nov 13, 2006, 4:10 PM
Post #8 of 76
(3039 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 23, 2004
Posts: 356
|
I like the over all look. The routes data base is definatly alot easier to use and I like the climbing log addition.As for changing your personal photo, I can't find that information.
Sean
|
|
|
|
|
qdiggety
Nov 13, 2006, 4:26 PM
Post #9 of 76
(3014 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808
|
Also it looks like any photos pop up in an external window instead of showing up in the post.......
That's kind of a pain....
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Nov 13, 2006, 4:33 PM
Post #10 of 76
(3001 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
I'm not so sure about this hew set up, not a huge fan of how the profile layouts are, and I can't seem to find my friends listed.
Plus there are those weird new smiles.
I'll give it a go and see how I feel about all this, but so far I'm not overly impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
wjca
Nov 13, 2006, 4:46 PM
Post #12 of 76
(2982 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545
|
In reply to: In reply to: Changing your profile picture is hard to do. The photo resolution is terrible. Some profile photos don't look good because they were small on the old site and have now been resized, stretched and processed. Try uploading a new one - it should look better. We allow a much higher resolution than on the old site.  DDT
And the nudie pics? What of those, sir?
|
|
|
|
|
hangerlessbolt
Nov 13, 2006, 4:49 PM
Post #13 of 76
(2977 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2001
Posts: 7255
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: Changing your profile picture is hard to do. The photo resolution is terrible. Some profile photos don't look good because they were small on the old site and have now been resized, stretched and processed. Try uploading a new one - it should look better. We allow a much higher resolution than on the old site. DDT And the nudie pics? What of those, sir?
You can just keep sending those to me
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Nov 13, 2006, 5:00 PM
Post #14 of 76
(2949 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: Changing your profile picture is hard to do. The photo resolution is terrible. Some profile photos don't look good because they were small on the old site and have now been resized, stretched and processed. Try uploading a new one - it should look better. We allow a much higher resolution than on the old site. DDT And the nudie pics? What of those, sir? You can just keep sending those to me
This new quoting format sucks too.
|
|
|
|
|
redlegrangerone
Nov 13, 2006, 5:01 PM
Post #15 of 76
(2943 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 851
|
I also would like to know where my friends list went. I guess I should have written them down?
|
|
|
|
|
wjca
Nov 13, 2006, 5:02 PM
Post #16 of 76
(2939 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 27, 2005
Posts: 7545
|
I do have a couple legitimate remarks.
One. It doesn't look like you can just make a post in a thread without having to reply to someone else's comment. That may get confusing.
Two. When you quote someone, it doesn't give credit to the quote. In a long stream, this could become really confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
qdiggety
Nov 13, 2006, 5:05 PM
Post #17 of 76
(2933 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808
|
In reply to: I do have a couple legitimate remarks. One. It doesn't look like you can just make a post in a thread without having to reply to someone else's comment. That may get confusing. Two. When you quote someone, it doesn't give credit to the quote. In a long stream, this could become really confusing.
Lets see how the quote thing works......
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Nov 13, 2006, 5:07 PM
Post #18 of 76
(2928 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
In reply to: In reply to: I do have a couple legitimate remarks. One. It doesn't look like you can just make a post in a thread without having to reply to someone else's comment. That may get confusing. Two. When you quote someone, it doesn't give credit to the quote. In a long stream, this could become really confusing. Lets see how the quote thing works......
|
|
|
|
|
jumpingrock
Nov 13, 2006, 5:07 PM
Post #19 of 76
(2927 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 5692
|
Anybody else find that it's harder to see who wrote a specific post? Feels less natural.
|
|
|
|
|
qdiggety
Nov 13, 2006, 5:07 PM
Post #20 of 76
(2927 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808
|
The quote tabs are still in the post editing page....
|
|
|
|
|
qdiggety
Nov 13, 2006, 5:08 PM
Post #21 of 76
(2920 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808
|
It also looks like the old signatures were dumped as well......
|
|
|
|
|
hess
Nov 13, 2006, 5:08 PM
Post #22 of 76
(2918 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2006
Posts: 16
|
In reply to: In reply to: I do have a couple legitimate remarks. One. It doesn't look like you can just make a post in a thread without having to reply to someone else's comment. That may get confusing. Two. When you quote someone, it doesn't give credit to the quote. In a long stream, this could become really confusing. Lets see how the quote thing works......
Well... it works. Problem is, who's being quoted?
|
|
|
|
|
jumpingrock
Nov 13, 2006, 5:12 PM
Post #23 of 76
(2911 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 16, 2002
Posts: 5692
|
In reply to: In reply to: In reply to: I do have a couple legitimate remarks. One. It doesn't look like you can just make a post in a thread without having to reply to someone else's comment. That may get confusing. Two. When you quote someone, it doesn't give credit to the quote. In a long stream, this could become really confusing. Lets see how the quote thing works...... Well... it works. Problem is, who's being quoted?
Hmmmm my tests failed
(This post was edited by jumpingrock on Nov 13, 2006, 5:15 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
qdiggety
Nov 13, 2006, 5:14 PM
Post #24 of 76
(2904 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 2, 2004
Posts: 808
|
Not quite sure.....
It no longer allows pictures in the sig line either.
No more ogling Mowz hot chicas.....
Damn!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
vertical_reality
Nov 13, 2006, 5:16 PM
Post #25 of 76
(2897 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 19, 2002
Posts: 2073
|
Glad to see the page loading time did not improve either.
I miss the old RC.com logo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
