Forums: Climbing Information: Gear Heads:
superfluous tricams?
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Gear Heads

Premier Sponsor:

 


bussolinister


Sep 10, 2008, 12:12 AM
Post #1 of 21 (2129 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2008
Posts: 5

superfluous tricams?
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

So I'm looking into buying myself some tricams. I would never lead without the little suckers, but, after scouring the other forums, I haven't been able to find anything except praises for the 4 smallest sizes. I've climbed with these and love them, but I've found packages selling .5 to either size 3 or 4. Part of me is thinking the more tricams the better, but does anyone have any experience with them? At what point (if any) do they just get too big to place easily on trad/too heavy to carry around? Or can anyone offer advice as to why I should buy the bigger sizes??


deltav


Sep 10, 2008, 12:17 AM
Post #2 of 21 (2119 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 597

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The hell with the small sizes, you need doubles of the number 7 Wink


chossmonkey


Sep 10, 2008, 1:03 AM
Post #3 of 21 (2079 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Generally cams work better compared to the bigger sizes of tricams.

I have the pink through blue. I mostly use the pink and red. The brown and blue come in handy for pockets sometimes.


aerili


Sep 10, 2008, 1:24 AM
Post #4 of 21 (2060 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1166

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I also have pink through blue. I seem to use the pink, red, and brown the most. This has been true of areas as varied as Red Rocks, Lumpy Ridge, and my local Superstitions (rhyolite) and McDowells (desert granite).


granite_grrl


Sep 10, 2008, 1:57 AM
Post #5 of 21 (2026 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084

Re: [aerili] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Dito - pink to blue, and I don't often use the blue....so why would I bother picking up anything bigger?


shockabuku


Sep 10, 2008, 2:29 AM
Post #6 of 21 (1996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I own pink through white or green. I don't know which one is biggest because I generally don't use the sizes past the brown.


colatownkid


Sep 10, 2008, 2:30 AM
Post #7 of 21 (1995 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 27, 2007
Posts: 512

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i currently lead on a rack of cams, but i definitely have experience with tricams in NC granite. my personal take is that the pink tricam fits just about anywhere. red and brown are also typically nice. however, i don't use them because it is very rare for me to find a placement where a cam won't fit just as well (or better).

as far as bigger sizes, it's kinda like hexes: they're lighter for the size they fit, so if you know you can use them, awesome, if not, well, not-so-awesome.

the principle use i find for my tricams is when i know i can use them in a particular anchor setup for a toprope. also, they're great as anchor pieces on multipitch with long pitches where i'd rather not have to leave my cams in the anchor.


moss1956


Sep 10, 2008, 3:11 AM
Post #8 of 21 (1961 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 6, 2002
Posts: 213

Re: [colatownkid] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The really big tricams can be sort of clanky. I don't just mean when you are carrying them up. Getting a 7 wedged into a placement so that it won't budge is more challenging than setting a small or medium tricam.

I would put off buying the big ones unless you have a lot of disposable income, or until you climb something, where you realize a big one would be good.

I have had some really bomber placements up through the green one,
but really the four smallest are the ones that get used the most by far.

My experience with Hexes is similar. The big ones sound like cowbells when you are carrying them, and then its a chore to set them. The small ones are likewise easier to place.


adatesman


Sep 10, 2008, 1:09 PM
Post #9 of 21 (1831 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 3479

Post deleted by adatesman [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  

 


jungle_george


Sep 10, 2008, 1:51 PM
Post #10 of 21 (1799 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 13, 2008
Posts: 85

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

There has been some good info on this thread.

Here's some food for thought about sizes 6&7. Before I say this, both my regular partners have the #7 and place it on occassion - I give them crap about carrying around a boat anchor etc., but they seem to like it and climb harder than me, so...each to his/her own I guess.

On the big sizes that protect offwidth: if you flail on offwidth (like me and 95.3% of all climbers), you've got to be super careful with these dudes. They are so very easy to kick out if you're flailing around, much more so than a cam of similar size.

Some other food for thought: personally when I'm gripped in greasy offwidth, offhands, or something else wide and atrocious, fiddling with a large tri-cam is less than fun. One other advantage to a having a cam in this situation is you can often keep pushing it above you as you go up.

Just my .02 - hope this helps.


reno


Sep 10, 2008, 1:59 PM
Post #11 of 21 (1787 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 30, 2001
Posts: 18283

Re: [aerili] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

aerili wrote:
I also have pink through blue. I seem to use the pink, red, and brown the most.

That's been my experience as well. My tricams have a permanent place on my light alpine rack.


sungam


Sep 10, 2008, 3:46 PM
Post #12 of 21 (1736 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [adatesman] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I've used both the normal wired and the swivel-wired tri cams.
Both are good for scottish winter (only time I used 'em).Never had to use the swivel one passively, and I find the normal wire fast and easier to place with one cold hand.


dr_feelgood


Sep 10, 2008, 5:04 PM
Post #13 of 21 (1687 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [colatownkid] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The largest one is ideal for killing medium to large sized rodents, baby seals, spiders, child sized zombies, dead hookers and cutzing the rope for your partner.
I own a full set.


michalp


Sep 10, 2008, 5:06 PM
Post #14 of 21 (1683 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 1, 2006
Posts: 9

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I badly wanted to use them... I have the pink, red, and brown.

Not that I am trad expert but I did trips to Yosemite & Tulomne, (CA), Leavenworth (WA), Red Rocks (NV), Cannon Cliff (NH) and placed them maybe twice PER TRIP.

However, in The Gunks I find placement for them on MOST of the CLIMBS. That must be specific type of rock (quartzite conglomerate) that has many horizontal cracks, for which tricams work well.


uni_jim


Sep 10, 2008, 5:56 PM
Post #15 of 21 (1633 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 27, 2008
Posts: 429

Re: [dr_feelgood] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
The largest one is ideal for killing medium to large sized rodents, baby seals, spiders, child sized zombies, dead hookers and cutzing the rope for your partner.
I own a full set.

how do you re-kill a hooker? or is it a zombie hooker?


hafilax


Sep 10, 2008, 6:01 PM
Post #16 of 21 (1628 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [michalp] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The ones bigger than blue or brown are better suited to alpine or scrambling where the light weight and large range makes them versatile and well... light. They're also cheaper than cams if you have to bail.

On harder routes I tend to place tricams at easy stances to save cams for the plug and go situations.

The black tricam is only good for really shallow placements where it won't get stuck like described above. It's great for shallow flared pin scars for example.


strongmadsends


Sep 10, 2008, 6:04 PM
Post #17 of 21 (1622 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 22, 2005
Posts: 113

Re: [bussolinister] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have the black through brown on my rack. The black one seems to clean well...I dig them for where I climb.


patmay81


Sep 10, 2008, 6:07 PM
Post #18 of 21 (1615 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2006
Posts: 1081

Re: [uni_jim] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

uni_jim wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
The largest one is ideal for killing medium to large sized rodents, baby seals, spiders, child sized zombies, dead hookers and cutzing the rope for your partner.
I own a full set.

how do you re-kill a hooker? or is it a zombie hooker?

I'm pretty sure there has already been a discussion on killing zombies in another thread. Tricams where not on the list of approved weapons.


hafilax


Sep 10, 2008, 7:04 PM
Post #19 of 21 (1578 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025

Re: [patmay81] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It should be!!


bussolinister


Sep 11, 2008, 2:12 AM
Post #20 of 21 (1475 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 9, 2008
Posts: 5

Re: [dr_feelgood] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

dr_feelgood wrote:
The largest one is ideal for killing medium to large sized rodents, baby seals, spiders, child sized zombies, dead hookers and cutzing the rope for your partner.
I own a full set.

I mean I knew they were versatile... now what do I use if I'm only looking to kill small rodents and woodland creatures? Is that where the #5 and #6 come in?


dr_feelgood


Sep 11, 2008, 2:14 AM
Post #21 of 21 (1471 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060

Re: [uni_jim] superfluous tricams? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

uni_jim wrote:
dr_feelgood wrote:
The largest one is ideal for killing medium to large sized rodents, baby seals, spiders, child sized zombies, dead hookers and cutzing the rope for your partner.
I own a full set.

how do you re-kill a hooker? or is it a zombie hooker?
Bitch wouldn't give me my money.


Forums : Climbing Information : Gear Heads

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook