|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 6, 2008, 10:09 PM
Post #1 of 31
(1464 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
...to create a claymation style deathmatch between RC.com users.
I swear, this would really work but I can't pull it off. Is there anyone out there with enough talent and time off to make this happen?
We could have a fight of the week (or even a climb-off of the week). Rules would have to be such that the on-line personas would have to be respected and displayed within the fight. The winner would get to post anything he / she wanted for the week without repurcussions (in a specific, campground thread, of course). Losers would be banned for the week from saying the words "I", "The", "Me", "He", and "She" for an entire week (I'm not married to this rule, so it can be up for debate).
Possible pay-per-view matches could be:
- Angry vs. Majid
- WVClimber vs. all users
- Cracklover vs. Boltlover
- Pinktricam vs RRRadam
- Wonderwoman vs Zeke
- Clausti vs anyone stupid enough to get in the ring
- Carabiner vs all the hot ladies
etc, etc, etc.
How about it? Anyone out there who could do this?
|
|
|
|
|
Myxomatosis
Nov 6, 2008, 10:15 PM
Post #2 of 31
(1454 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 12, 2007
Posts: 1063
|
Id pay to see majid get owned....
I can just see Angry sporting a "modified" hex/piton combo 
|
|
|
|
|
kriso9tails
Nov 6, 2008, 10:35 PM
Post #3 of 31
(1444 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: - Carabiner vs all the hot ladies
What do you mean to say here? That she's not at all hot? Why don't you just come out and tell us what you really think of her.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Nov 6, 2008, 10:53 PM
Post #4 of 31
(1432 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
The winner would get to post anything? What is the point?
How would the winner be determined to begin with?
Is this supposed to be another attempt at your "new humor"?
|
|
|
|
|
Azure
Nov 6, 2008, 11:38 PM
Post #5 of 31
(1407 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 28
|
Everyone already posts whatever they want. I think it would be much more entertaining to bring the entire community together in person and throw cage fights.
Though I suppose if money were involved you might find a taker on the claymation.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 12:06 AM
Post #6 of 31
(1399 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
chossmonkey wrote: The winner would get to post anything? What is the point? How would the winner be determined to begin with? Is this supposed to be another attempt at your "new humor"?
that's not entirely true. people do get banned.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 12:08 AM
Post #7 of 31
(1398 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
kriso9tails wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: - Carabiner vs all the hot ladies What do you mean to say here? That she's not at all hot? Why don't you just come out and tell us what you really think of her.
hmmm...well, you raise a good point. I was merely moving toward her lesbian tendancies. The card has been officially changed to:
The smokin' hot Carabiner (hot enough to burn your hands after rappel) vs all other ladies noted in the hottest climbing chick thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 12:09 AM
Post #8 of 31
(1396 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
Forgot about a potential main event:
Happie vs AB
with an undercard of:
Happie's dog Teddy vs AB's Chonson
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Nov 7, 2008, 12:43 AM
Post #10 of 31
(1363 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: Forgot about a potential main event: Happie vs AB with an undercard of: Happie's dog Teddy vs AB's Chonson
Ugh. You just lost it right there. There is NO WAY I'm sculpting AB's chonson.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 12:48 AM
Post #11 of 31
(1361 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
j_ung wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: - Clausti vs anyone stupid enough to get in the ring My wife'll get in the ring with clausti. (Gawd, I wish.)
Did you just call your wife stupid? Oops! Better make sure she isn't looking over your shoulder. 
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Nov 7, 2008, 2:37 AM
Post #12 of 31
(1339 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: chossmonkey wrote: The winner would get to post anything? What is the point? How would the winner be determined to begin with? Is this supposed to be another attempt at your "new humor"? that's not entirely true. people do get banned.
I'd like to see some of the golden oldies, though.
Like Jono13 VS Tgreen, or a grand special of the BET vs the modz.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Nov 7, 2008, 2:39 PM
Post #13 of 31
(1298 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: chossmonkey wrote: The winner would get to post anything? What is the point? How would the winner be determined to begin with? Is this supposed to be another attempt at your "new humor"? that's not entirely true. people do get banned.
People do get banned, but what they post really isn't worth reading or looking at most of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Nov 7, 2008, 2:40 PM
Post #14 of 31
(1296 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: The smokin' hot Carabiner (hot enough to burn your hands after rappel) vs all other ladies noted in the hottest climbing chick thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 2:41 PM
Post #15 of 31
(1295 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
chossmonkey wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: chossmonkey wrote: The winner would get to post anything? What is the point? How would the winner be determined to begin with? Is this supposed to be another attempt at your "new humor"? that's not entirely true. people do get banned. You olny answered part of my question. People do get banned, but what they post really isn't worth reading or looking at most of the time.
Oh, i think given the opportunity at free reign that there'd be some people who would make for some pretty creative tongue lashing, particularly if they knew they wouldn't get banned.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Nov 7, 2008, 2:43 PM
Post #16 of 31
(1292 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
j_ung wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: - Clausti vs anyone stupid enough to get in the ring My wife'll get in the ring with clausti. (Gawd, I wish.)
What about Clausti and Newbie? That would have been a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Nov 7, 2008, 2:43 PM
Post #17 of 31
(1291 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
knieveltech wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: Forgot about a potential main event: Happie vs AB with an undercard of: Happie's dog Teddy vs AB's Chonson Ugh. You just lost it right there. There is NO WAY I'm sculpting AB's chonson.
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Nov 7, 2008, 2:43 PM
Post #18 of 31
(1289 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
kriso9tails wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: - Carabiner vs all the hot ladies What do you mean to say here? That she's not at all hot? Why don't you just come out and tell us what you really think of her.
YEAH! 
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Nov 7, 2008, 2:44 PM
Post #19 of 31
(1285 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: kriso9tails wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: - Carabiner vs all the hot ladies What do you mean to say here? That she's not at all hot? Why don't you just come out and tell us what you really think of her. hmmm...well, you raise a good point. I was merely moving toward her lesbian tendancies. The card has been officially changed to: The smokin' hot Carabiner (hot enough to burn your hands after rappel) vs all other ladies noted in the hottest climbing chick thread.
BETTER.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Nov 7, 2008, 2:45 PM
Post #20 of 31
(1280 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
Gmburns2000 wrote: chossmonkey wrote: Gmburns2000 wrote: chossmonkey wrote: The winner would get to post anything? What is the point? How would the winner be determined to begin with? Is this supposed to be another attempt at your "new humor"? that's not entirely true. people do get banned. You olny answered part of my question. People do get banned, but what they post really isn't worth reading or looking at most of the time. Oh, i think given the opportunity at free reign that there'd be some people who would make for some pretty creative tongue lashing, particularly if they knew they wouldn't get banned.
As it is you have to give creative tongue lashings.
It would just end up being a bunch of nekid wimmin pictures posted. Which is cool, but you can find better ones other places wiht less effort
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 3:38 PM
Post #21 of 31
(1256 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
I'd take Biner wrasslin' with other wimmin, as I assume clothes would certainly be torn in the process. Name one person who wouldn't post and repost those over and over again. ONE!
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Nov 7, 2008, 5:09 PM
Post #22 of 31
(1235 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
I guess I have not spent enough time on here to have built up an arch enemy, but if anyone creates my claymation persona, let me help you out.
First of all, I should have some mad ninja, karaticizing skillz. Second, right before or right after layin' the smack down, I should have some type of one-liner, such as "I only have 2 speeds...Walk and KILL!"
For physical attributes, I would like an afro and I should be shirtless with spandex.
Thanks, Josh
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Nov 7, 2008, 5:15 PM
Post #23 of 31
(1232 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
blueeyedclimber wrote: For physical attributes, I would like an afro and I should be shirtless with spandex.
Yeah, pretty much his regular attire!
|
|
|
|
|
Gmburns2000
Nov 7, 2008, 5:25 PM
Post #24 of 31
(1223 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 6, 2007
Posts: 15266
|
how about we have as an undercard to the Wonderwoman vs Zeke main event a Wonderwoman vs BEC warm up match. All those karate skills could be immediately neutralized by her death verbals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
