Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Sport Climbing:
Bailing on long sport route
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Sport Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All


jeepnphreak


Jul 17, 2009, 7:11 PM
Post #26 of 48 (11089 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
Sport route? It's a messed up sport route if you have to use a second rope to get down. Rapping to intermediate anchors I can understand. But a sport route that requires two ropes? It seems like an oxymoron.

But maybe I'm just climbing in the wrong places.

Not really. in montana we have a few, (not many) single pitch sport routes that are 140-160 feet long that requires a doubel rope rap to get down. Iam sure were not the only place that has long pitch routes.


shimanilami


Jul 17, 2009, 8:23 PM
Post #27 of 48 (11080 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [jeepnphreak] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It's all good, but IMO "sport" implies maximum convenience and minimal effort ... for me, that is. You lazy bastards should put midway rap anchors in and then, perhaps, I'll come and climb there.


marc801


Jul 17, 2009, 8:55 PM
Post #28 of 48 (11073 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
It's all good, but IMO "sport" implies maximum convenience and minimal effort ... for me, that is. You lazy bastards should put midway rap anchors in and then, perhaps, I'll come and climb there.
As an example, there's a particular 3 pitch sport route at City of Rocks, with the belay stations 160' apart (when a 50m rope was the standard). I'd rather trail my 8mm static line and do 3 raps to the ground instead of taking only one rope and doing 6 raps.

Maximum convenience and minimal effort can sometimes be mutually exclusive.


Partner oldsalt


Jul 17, 2009, 9:16 PM
Post #29 of 48 (11067 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 19, 2004
Posts: 919

Re: [Peasley1] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Peasley1 wrote:
...I predominatly climb in NC and not a lot where u need two ropes to rap down...

One NC locale that comes to mind is Table Rock. The second and third pitches of the trade route Jim Dandy are too long to rap on half a rope length. (I've done them, but I was 10' short of the p2 anchor when rapping from p3. I clipped an old bolt and held on while my partner rapped to me.) We trail a second rope up and use both to rap p3-p2, then p2-ground, omitting p1 anchors entirely.

I also like to carry 200' of 5mm cord in a mesh bag. I hang the primary through both anchor rings with a big locker stopper. The tag line is also on the big locker, but not through the rings. It feeds out of the bag while I rap, and then I use it to haul down the primary.

Great for soloing.


marc801


Jul 17, 2009, 9:32 PM
Post #30 of 48 (11064 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [oldsalt] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

oldsalt wrote:
I also like to carry 200' of 5mm cord in a mesh bag. I hang the primary through both anchor rings with a big locker stopper. The tag line is also on the big locker, but not through the rings. It feeds out of the bag while I rap, and then I use it to haul down the primary.
Standard technique in canyoneering, too. It's called a biner block. The only downside with that skinny a retrieval line is that if your primary (lead) line gets stuck on the pull-down, you may have no way of safely climbing up to free it.


bill413


Jul 17, 2009, 10:29 PM
Post #31 of 48 (11044 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
It's all good, but IMO "sport" implies maximum convenience and minimal effort ... for me, that is. You lazy bastards should put midway rap anchors in and then, perhaps, I'll come and climb there.

Minimal effort - they should put f'ing ladders on the rock.


shimanilami


Jul 18, 2009, 12:22 AM
Post #32 of 48 (11025 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 24, 2006
Posts: 2043

Re: [bill413] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
shimanilami wrote:
It's all good, but IMO "sport" implies maximum convenience and minimal effort ... for me, that is. You lazy bastards should put midway rap anchors in and then, perhaps, I'll come and climb there.

Minimal effort - they should put f'ing ladders on the rock.

What are you saying, that aid climbing is easy? Them's fightin' words, Bill.


marc801


Jul 18, 2009, 1:05 AM
Post #33 of 48 (11021 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
What are you saying, that aid climbing is easy?
It sure can be.....but it's the walls to which it's often attached......


bill413


Jul 18, 2009, 2:16 AM
Post #34 of 48 (11011 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
bill413 wrote:
shimanilami wrote:
It's all good, but IMO "sport" implies maximum convenience and minimal effort ... for me, that is. You lazy bastards should put midway rap anchors in and then, perhaps, I'll come and climb there.

Minimal effort - they should put f'ing ladders on the rock.

What are you saying, that aid climbing is easy? Them's fightin' words, Bill.
Nope - i know aid is work (perhaps too much so). Surprisingly hard work.

It's the "maximum convenience" phrase. Hmmm...can we have shuttles to the cliffs instead of those stupid approaches?


jamincan


Jul 18, 2009, 12:36 PM
Post #35 of 48 (10997 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 1, 2007
Posts: 207

Re: [bill413] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

bill413 wrote:
It's the "maximum convenience" phrase. Hmmm...can we have shuttles to the cliffs instead of those stupid approaches?

I've always thought it would be handy to have retractable awnings installed at the top of popular crags for rainy days. Tongue


Goo


Jul 18, 2009, 12:42 PM
Post #36 of 48 (10993 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 6, 2008
Posts: 68

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

there are a couple routes like that here in georgia that i can think of. isn't too uncommon.


jeepnphreak


Jul 20, 2009, 11:30 PM
Post #37 of 48 (10934 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259

Re: [shimanilami] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

shimanilami wrote:
It's all good, but IMO "sport" implies maximum convenience and minimal effort ... for me, that is. You lazy bastards should put midway rap anchors in and then, perhaps, I'll come and climb there.

Sport implies max convenience... not here. Spots simply mean a face climb that your cant protect anyother way, so we drill in a couple of bolts. Plus why should we put in halfway rap stations in if it keeps you/other climber off the routes if you are unwilling to pack up an extra rope. that means less people to waite for. ha ha.


wallwombat


Aug 6, 2009, 7:55 AM
Post #38 of 48 (10856 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2003
Posts: 727

Re: [potreroed] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

potreroed wrote:
In El Potrero Chico, world capital of big wall sport climbs....

I would have thought that the Verdon Gorge would qualify as "the world capital of big wall sport climbs" but since it's not in North America, you probably haven't heard of it.


potreroed


Aug 6, 2009, 7:09 PM
Post #39 of 48 (10819 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 30, 2001
Posts: 1454

Re: [wallwombat] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Although I've not been there (have you?) I am aware of the fabulous Verdon Gorge. We get many French and other European climbers at El Potrero Chico who tell me EPC is as good as Verdon. In fact, a couple who own a Bed & Breakfast at Verdon come to El Potrero Chico every winter for their vacation.


clmbr


Aug 25, 2009, 2:41 AM
Post #40 of 48 (10726 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 31, 2008
Posts: 29

Re: [Peasley1] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Setting up the second rope to rap from the anchors is fine... if you get to the anchors, but usually if you gotta bail it'll be at the most awkward part of a climb and hanging off your quickdraw on a single bolt. So you're not going to be bringing the second up with the extra rope and all of you hanging off the bolt. To do all the tasks involved in setting up the second rope yourself is going to be mission there too. Don't forget your maillion or byebye to quickdraw


docburner


Aug 25, 2009, 5:31 PM
Post #41 of 48 (10700 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 11, 2005
Posts: 192

Re: [bigo] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

At a local crag in ca, people just stop clipping bolts once they hit the ~110 foot mark, and then take the whip. But I guess it is all fixed draws so you don't have to get any gear back.


ShibbyShane


Aug 25, 2009, 9:34 PM
Post #42 of 48 (10684 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 16, 2008
Posts: 166

Re: [docburner] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

docburner wrote:
At a local crag in ca, people just stop clipping bolts once they hit the ~110 foot mark, and then take the whip. But I guess it is all fixed draws so you don't have to get any gear back.

Huh? How far will they climb above the last bolt if they're doing this? I mean, if the climb is 140 or so, they're taking a 60+ foot whipper... I wouldn't think it'd be too good for your rope to do this all the time.

Where in CA is this?


freerangequark


Oct 31, 2009, 7:21 PM
Post #43 of 48 (10331 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 23, 2006
Posts: 107

Re: [Peasley1] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Peasley1 wrote:
1.) Treat like double ropes (don't like this option because of the increased forces on mah body/anchor, they are both 10.2)


On trad routes I've almost always used twins...

but in regard to #1 (above) I was wondering...

Would it be possible for the leader to climb with two standard ropes, clip the two ropes. but have the belayer only belaying one of the ropes. Essentially the second rope is along for the ride and while the first rope is doing what a single rope would normally do.

There are a few possible drawbacks I see to this such as increased rope weight on the leader.

I've never climbed like this and am not recommending. I am simply asking if there is anything problematic or dangerous with what I am describing?

Thanks,
Glenn


(This post was edited by freerangequark on Oct 31, 2009, 7:55 PM)


slablizard


Oct 31, 2009, 7:37 PM
Post #44 of 48 (10326 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 13, 2003
Posts: 5558

Re: [wallwombat] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

One of the best climbing in the world...amazing multi-pitch climbs, they all start with a hanging belay...and you better be SOLID on anything under 11a, it's runout man...and WAY exposed..the fiurst whippers take your breath off..then you get addicted to it.


wallwombat wrote:
potreroed wrote:
In El Potrero Chico, world capital of big wall sport climbs....

I would have thought that the Verdon Gorge would qualify as "the world capital of big wall sport climbs" but since it's not in North America, you probably haven't heard of it.


qtm


Nov 1, 2009, 1:42 AM
Post #45 of 48 (10313 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 8, 2004
Posts: 548

Re: [freerangequark] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

freerangequark wrote:
Peasley1 wrote:
1.) Treat like double ropes (don't like this option because of the increased forces on mah body/anchor, they are both 10.2)


On trad routes I've almost always used twins...

but in regard to #1 (above) I was wondering...

Would it be possible for the leader to climb with two standard ropes, clip the two ropes. but have the belayer only belaying one of the ropes. Essentially the second rope is along for the ride and while the first rope is doing what a single rope would normally do.

There are a few possible drawbacks I see to this such as increased rope weight on the leader.

I've never climbed like this and am not recommending. I am simply asking if there is anything problematic or dangerous with what I am describing?

Thanks,
Glenn

Having other sport climbers laughing at you?

I'm primarily a trad climber and climb with doubles. I've lead trad and sport with two singles as doubles when I felt it would be easier for me to lead than have the 2nd trail the rope for whatever reason. Yes, I'd rather have the 2nd trail it, but taking into consideration the route and the abilities of my 2nd, sometimes it's better if I lead with it.

I'd rather lead as doubles than clipping as twins and leaving one unbelayed. Otherwise I'll just trail it and not bother making the effort to clip it.


bennydh


Nov 1, 2009, 3:52 AM
Post #46 of 48 (10299 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 2, 2005
Posts: 368

Re: [Peasley1] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

It brings up issues of redundancy, safety, and usually instigates a lot of butt hurt people on forums with retorts like: "you're gonna kill the noob", but it is still an option and done right it is relatively safe, IMO.

Have someone knowledgeable teach you a Texas Rope Trick. Also acknowledge that fucking up, or a simple lapse in judgment has serious consequences... Like death.


freerangequark


Nov 1, 2009, 1:24 PM
Post #47 of 48 (10275 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 23, 2006
Posts: 107

Re: [qtm] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

qtm wrote:
freerangequark wrote:
Peasley1 wrote:
1.) Treat like double ropes (don't like this option because of the increased forces on mah body/anchor, they are both 10.2)


On trad routes I've almost always used twins...

but in regard to #1 (above) I was wondering...

Would it be possible for the leader to climb with two standard ropes, clip the two ropes. but have the belayer only belaying one of the ropes. Essentially the second rope is along for the ride and while the first rope is doing what a single rope would normally do.

There are a few possible drawbacks I see to this such as increased rope weight on the leader.

I've never climbed like this and am not recommending. I am simply asking if there is anything problematic or dangerous with what I am describing?

Thanks,
Glenn

Having other sport climbers laughing at you?

I'm primarily a trad climber and climb with doubles. I've lead trad and sport with two singles as doubles when I felt it would be easier for me to lead than have the 2nd trail the rope for whatever reason. Yes, I'd rather have the 2nd trail it, but taking into consideration the route and the abilities of my 2nd, sometimes it's better if I lead with it.

I'd rather lead as doubles than clipping as twins and leaving one unbelayed. Otherwise I'll just trail it and not bother making the effort to clip it.


LOL...my bad for not clarifying.

I was talking about a trad route where the other rope coming up as a tagline from the second might get caught in a crack or where the route might wander a bit.... not on a sport route.

-Glenn


newriverE


Nov 1, 2009, 4:28 PM
Post #48 of 48 (10255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 6, 2009
Posts: 36

Re: [Peasley1] Bailing on long sport route [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Having two ropes is great. Alternate their use and extend both of their lives. I guess it depends on the routes you'll be climbing as to whether or not I'd carry two ropes. For my taste, I'd rather carry along two extra $7.50 quicksilver screwgates and leave them on the route if I had to bail early than deal with the extra weight, bulk, or logistics of bringing along the second rope. I'm thinking of long vertical sport climbs here. I know that people take two ropes up climbs all the time. OR, if I knew that my favorite place to climb had super long pitches and I needed more cord to get to the ground I'd just order my favorite rope from Sterling in an 80m version. It's like 80 dollars more and over the life of the rope that extra cost would be worth the freedom of a single line, in my opinion.
And, if you want to check out some sweet multipitch sport this side of the Verdon go to the beaver dam wall area outside of St George UT where there are some 7 pitch climbs up to the 14a range...

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Sport Climbing

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook