|
delfindle
Aug 24, 2009, 3:24 PM
Post #1 of 23
(2317 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
andersjr
Aug 24, 2009, 4:25 PM
Post #3 of 23
(2190 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 1, 2005
Posts: 141
|
Do you seriously know how to read? I didn't see anywhere in that article that answered his question. That was an idiotic reply, and shows that you are just an ass.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Aug 24, 2009, 4:28 PM
Post #4 of 23
(2180 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
andersjr wrote: Do you seriously know how to read? I didn't see anywhere in that article that answered his question. That was an idiotic reply, and shows that you are just an ass.
No, this is an idiotic reply that shows I'm an ass:
Eat a dick.
|
|
|
|
|
lancebrock
Aug 24, 2009, 4:28 PM
Post #5 of 23
(2179 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 156
|
there was a dateline about it. i saw that re-run a few years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Aug 24, 2009, 4:33 PM
Post #7 of 23
(2161 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
Greg Child wrote a book about it a few years ago. Called "Over the Edge," I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Hennessey
Aug 24, 2009, 5:26 PM
Post #8 of 23
(2057 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 3, 2007
Posts: 595
|
camhead wrote: Greg Child wrote a book about it a few years ago. Called "Over the Edge," I think.
Great book
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Aug 24, 2009, 6:12 PM
Post #10 of 23
(1986 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
That, sir, is awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Aug 25, 2009, 2:19 AM
Post #12 of 23
(1817 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
No doubt. Now if only I hadn't clicked on that. Well played.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Aug 25, 2009, 2:56 AM
Post #13 of 23
(1768 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
Another poorly played thread where the OP deleted the original and the rest of the world is left in the dark as non of the early birds copied the post.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Aug 25, 2009, 3:00 AM
Post #14 of 23
(1759 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
We can always try and guess what the first post was. Here's is mine.
dorkfiddle wrote: So I was thinking that Beth was so hot, if her and me were to see each other in the mountains and I were to do the caveman thing and whack Tommy with a #10 hex and drag Beth off to a Cave for some cave man style long schlonging it, would it be a first ascent or am I breaking the law? Where could I find out this info |
|
|
|
|
camhead
Aug 25, 2009, 3:06 AM
Post #15 of 23
(1754 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
Ok, well, let's see if rc.com leaves this up: Beth and Tommy split! There, you heard it. It has been circulating around the internets for a couple months, both their wikipedia articles refer to their marriage in the past tense, their joint website is down, and some blogs are starting to mention it. Like Potter and Davis, when climbers make a brand name out of their couplehood, I think they owe it to us to tell when it is over.
You heard it on rc.com first, punters.
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Aug 25, 2009, 3:17 AM
Post #16 of 23
(1736 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
camhead wrote: Ok, well, let's see if rc.com leaves this up: Beth and Tommy split! There, you heard it. It has been circulating around the internets for a couple months, both their wikipedia articles refer to their marriage in the past tense, their joint website is down, and some blogs are starting to mention it. Like Potter and Davis, when climbers make a brand name out of their couplehood, I think they owe it to us to tell when it is over. You heard it on rc.com first, punters.
Well, you owe it to the climbing community to stick it out and prove that it can be done. Clamhead forever. 
Curt
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Aug 25, 2009, 3:25 AM
Post #17 of 23
(1725 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
billcoe_ wrote: Another poorly played thread where the OP deleted the original and the rest of the world is left in the dark as non of the early birds copied the post.
2. The OP reacted poorly to the early responses by taking down his post.
For the record, the OP was asking about a video news report, possibly on Nightline or 20/20 or some such TV news magazine about the incident and how he might locate it. He wasn't asking about the details of the incident, which he obviously knew. Had the the early snide, moronic responders actually read the post, they wouldn't have missed the obvious question and look like fools.
The second response recognizes this.
(This post was edited by marc801 on Aug 25, 2009, 3:27 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Aug 25, 2009, 3:31 AM
Post #18 of 23
(1720 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
curt wrote: camhead wrote: Ok, well, let's see if rc.com leaves this up: Beth and Tommy split! There, you heard it. It has been circulating around the internets for a couple months, both their wikipedia articles refer to their marriage in the past tense, their joint website is down, and some blogs are starting to mention it. Like Potter and Davis, when climbers make a brand name out of their couplehood, I think they owe it to us to tell when it is over. You heard it on rc.com first, punters. Well, you owe it to the climbing community to stick it out and prove that it can be done. Clamhead forever. Curt
yeah, we climb 5.12. Give climbing couples chalk sponsor, now!
|
|
|
|
|
macherry
Aug 25, 2009, 3:43 AM
Post #19 of 23
(1706 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848
|
camhead wrote: Ok, well, let's see if rc.com leaves this up: Beth and Tommy split! There, you heard it. It has been circulating around the internets for a couple months, both their wikipedia articles refer to their marriage in the past tense, their joint website is down, and some blogs are starting to mention it. Like Potter and Davis, when climbers make a brand name out of their couplehood, I think they owe it to us to tell when it is over. You heard it on rc.com first, punters.
oh noez
|
|
|
|
|
knieveltech
Aug 25, 2009, 4:05 AM
Post #21 of 23
(1677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 2, 2006
Posts: 1431
|
curt wrote: camhead wrote: Ok, well, let's see if rc.com leaves this up: Beth and Tommy split! There, you heard it. It has been circulating around the internets for a couple months, both their wikipedia articles refer to their marriage in the past tense, their joint website is down, and some blogs are starting to mention it. Like Potter and Davis, when climbers make a brand name out of their couplehood, I think they owe it to us to tell when it is over. You heard it on rc.com first, punters. Well, you owe it to the climbing community to stick it in and prove that it can be done. Clamhead forever. Curt
Fixed!
|
|
|
|
|
angry
Aug 25, 2009, 5:33 AM
Post #22 of 23
(1631 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 22, 2003
Posts: 8405
|
Hennessey wrote: camhead wrote: Ok, well, let's see if rc.com leaves this up: Beth and Tommy split! There, you heard it. Yes. Now I have a chance with Beth 
Because after Tommy, I'm sure Beth is looking to date another climber.
|
|
|
|
|
shrug7
Aug 25, 2009, 2:20 PM
Post #23 of 23
(1484 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 18, 2006
Posts: 866
|
I think if you rickrolled lmgtfy the internet would go in to an infinity loop and explode.
just my two cents anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
