|
notapplicable
Jun 1, 2012, 10:33 PM
Post #51 of 58
(4265 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
curt wrote: j_ung wrote: curt wrote: After considerable further thought, I have arrived at the inescapable conclusion that I really don't care very much. You may now return to the ongoing soap opera. Thank you for your momentary attention. Curt Sure. I was just going off what you posted a few months ago. ^^ Actually, that was 16 months ago. Curt
New shit has come to light?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SylviaSmile
Jun 14, 2012, 7:50 PM
Post #53 of 58
(4197 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2011
Posts: 983
|
xmesox wrote: It looks as though the moderators still have a bit more weight in their votes than regular users, and we will be looking into possibly amending this to make their votes count the same as regular users. For the mean time I have requested that the moderators hold off 1-starring posts for the time being, even if they feel it's deserved. The reason they were given extra weight was that they are a trustworthy source and if they thought a post was excellent and rated it 5 stars, their vote could then not be cancelled out by some noob who comes and 1-stars the post because he doesn't know what it's about. As with any power, it can be abused. But there is no abuse in moderators one starring posts they deem as bad posts, it's when a post is 1-starred because they simply disagree with what is being said that it becomes an issue.
Can the mods see who gives how many stars to what? Just wondering.
|
|
|
|
|
wonderwoman
Jun 15, 2012, 2:53 AM
Post #54 of 58
(4186 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 14, 2002
Posts: 4275
|
SylviaSmile wrote: xmesox wrote: It looks as though the moderators still have a bit more weight in their votes than regular users, and we will be looking into possibly amending this to make their votes count the same as regular users. For the mean time I have requested that the moderators hold off 1-starring posts for the time being, even if they feel it's deserved. The reason they were given extra weight was that they are a trustworthy source and if they thought a post was excellent and rated it 5 stars, their vote could then not be cancelled out by some noob who comes and 1-stars the post because he doesn't know what it's about. As with any power, it can be abused. But there is no abuse in moderators one starring posts they deem as bad posts, it's when a post is 1-starred because they simply disagree with what is being said that it becomes an issue. Can the mods see who gives how many stars to what? Just wondering.
No, we can't see that. We can see your 'average' post rating if we go to your profile page, but I don't think that is visible to you. We formerly had trophies & poo. Those were the days!
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Aug 8, 2012, 4:48 PM
Post #55 of 58
(4021 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
wonderwoman wrote: SylviaSmile wrote: xmesox wrote: It looks as though the moderators still have a bit more weight in their votes than regular users, and we will be looking into possibly amending this to make their votes count the same as regular users. For the mean time I have requested that the moderators hold off 1-starring posts for the time being, even if they feel it's deserved. The reason they were given extra weight was that they are a trustworthy source and if they thought a post was excellent and rated it 5 stars, their vote could then not be cancelled out by some noob who comes and 1-stars the post because he doesn't know what it's about. As with any power, it can be abused. But there is no abuse in moderators one starring posts they deem as bad posts, it's when a post is 1-starred because they simply disagree with what is being said that it becomes an issue. Can the mods see who gives how many stars to what? Just wondering. No, we can't see that. We can see your 'average' post rating if we go to your profile page, but I don't think that is visible to you. We formerly had trophies & poo. Those were the days!
What is an average user's average post rating? More like 2, or more like 4?
GO
(This post was edited by cracklover on Aug 8, 2012, 4:49 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
edge
Aug 8, 2012, 4:52 PM
Post #56 of 58
(4016 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 9120
|
cracklover wrote: wonderwoman wrote: SylviaSmile wrote: xmesox wrote: It looks as though the moderators still have a bit more weight in their votes than regular users, and we will be looking into possibly amending this to make their votes count the same as regular users. For the mean time I have requested that the moderators hold off 1-starring posts for the time being, even if they feel it's deserved. The reason they were given extra weight was that they are a trustworthy source and if they thought a post was excellent and rated it 5 stars, their vote could then not be cancelled out by some noob who comes and 1-stars the post because he doesn't know what it's about. As with any power, it can be abused. But there is no abuse in moderators one starring posts they deem as bad posts, it's when a post is 1-starred because they simply disagree with what is being said that it becomes an issue. Can the mods see who gives how many stars to what? Just wondering. No, we can't see that. We can see your 'average' post rating if we go to your profile page, but I don't think that is visible to you. We formerly had trophies & poo. Those were the days! What is an average user's average post rating? More like 2, or more like 4? GO
Well yours is 4.3 out of 1022 posts rated, but I'd hardly call you average.
One prolific spraylord has a 1.3 out of 2384 posts rated, and I wouldn't call him average either.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Aug 8, 2012, 5:14 PM
Post #57 of 58
(4009 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Congratulations, you've just guaranteed that some one-star stalker will now find me irresistible, LOL.
G
(This post was edited by cracklover on Aug 8, 2012, 5:15 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Aug 11, 2012, 12:02 AM
Post #58 of 58
(3978 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
Is there a ratio of rated to unrated posts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
