|
pornstarr
May 11, 2004, 12:01 AM
Post #1 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 25, 2002
Posts: 824
|
please post your supporting evidence here... this could take awhile
|
|
|
|
|
oldandintheway
May 11, 2004, 12:04 AM
Post #2 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 13, 2002
Posts: 2450
|
In reply to: please post your supporting evidence here... I'll pass thank you. I'm just counting the seconds before the flaming starts...
|
|
|
|
|
philbox
Moderator
May 11, 2004, 12:11 AM
Post #3 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105
|
Well for starters you created this thread. I rest my case.
|
|
|
|
|
mike
May 11, 2004, 12:30 AM
Post #4 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 20, 2002
Posts: 1461
|
In reply to: please post your supporting evidence here... this could take awhile Pinocchio.
|
|
|
|
|
fullahsiffur
May 11, 2004, 12:44 AM
Post #5 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2003
Posts: 376
|
No, that doesn't count, it's just a story. Now the bible, on the other hand....
|
|
|
|
|
the_pirate
May 11, 2004, 12:48 AM
Post #6 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 20, 2003
Posts: 3984
|
I spilled pasta sauce down the front of my stove. Created quite a mess.
|
|
|
|
|
philbox
Moderator
May 11, 2004, 1:03 AM
Post #7 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 13105
|
A serious answer to your question though is this; What we need to discuss is that creationism vs evolutionism is a clash of belief systems, nothing more and nothing less. I reverse the challenge to you and ask that you post your supporting evidence first for evolutionism. The thing is that belief systems cannot be supported by evidence, there is as much weight for one as there is for the other, it is what you choose to believe in that counts in your mind as to whether you believe the evidence that may or may not support one belief system or the other.
|
|
|
|
|
dynamic
May 11, 2004, 1:28 AM
Post #8 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2001
Posts: 439
|
it is self-defeating to express the contention that the inexpressible cannot be expressed.
|
|
|
|
|
rick_james
May 11, 2004, 2:35 AM
Post #9 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 4, 2004
Posts: 30
|
In reply to: I reverse the challenge to you and ask that you post your supporting evidence first for evolutionism well given the topic of the thread i believe he was looking for specific evidence that supports creationism. the only evidence creationists seem to give is not actually evidence at all. they attempt to try and cast doubt on the theory of evolution, as if it somehow proves their belief/dogmatic faith. creationism and evolution are NOT the same.
|
|
|
|
|
fullahsiffur
May 11, 2004, 2:52 AM
Post #10 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2003
Posts: 376
|
In reply to: A serious answer to your question though is this; What we need to discuss is that creationism vs evolutionism is a clash of belief systems, nothing more and nothing less. I reverse the challenge to you and ask that you post your supporting evidence first for evolutionism. The thing is that belief systems cannot be supported by evidence, there is as much weight for one as there is for the other, it is what you choose to believe in that counts in your mind as to whether you believe the evidence that may or may not support one belief system or the other. Hmm... let's compare and contrast: Evidence for Creationism: Not everything about evolution is understood yet by modern science and evolution is seen as an affront to some religous veiws. Evidence for Evolution: Every living thing on earth and the findings of many thousands of scientists the world over.
|
|
|
|
|
climbinganne
May 11, 2004, 3:27 AM
Post #11 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 15, 2002
Posts: 11679
|
i like spare ribs!!!
|
|
|
|
|
nthusiastj
May 11, 2004, 3:29 AM
Post #12 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 3, 2002
Posts: 1994
|
Buddhism supports both science and religion. Therefore, supports both views. It's called the middle road. Plus Buddhists rarely gave gay little boy sex.
|
|
|
|
|
flying_dutchman
May 12, 2004, 3:48 AM
Post #13 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 708
|
uh, ur mistaking catholics and christians there... Anyhow, Creation says that God made everything in 6 days Evolution says that a single cell spawned all life Pick one and belive; i pick God.
|
|
|
|
|
scubasnyder
May 12, 2004, 3:54 AM
Post #14 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2003
Posts: 1639
|
Creation is a word of your imagination.....
|
|
|
|
|
rick_james
May 12, 2004, 4:58 AM
Post #15 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 4, 2004
Posts: 30
|
In reply to: Anyhow, Creation says that God made everything in 6 days Evolution says that a single cell spawned all life Pick one and belive; i pick God. i think ill pick knowledge and evidence. over blind faith. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
hugepedro
May 12, 2004, 6:24 AM
Post #16 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 2875
|
In reply to: I reverse the challenge to you and ask that you post your supporting evidence first for evolutionism. Texas longhorn cattle. Look it up. The mechanisms of evolution are observable. If there is a creator, I think it would be far more impressive if it created the laws of science that have led to what has evolved here. But that's just me. I don't feel any less "special" because I have evolved. I have no ego stake in a belief that something created me - it doesn't matter one way or the other.
|
|
|
|
|
brundige
May 13, 2004, 1:43 AM
Post #17 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 5, 2004
Posts: 305
|
In reply to: think ill pick knowledge and evidence. over blind faith. thanks. i think you chose ignorance to you realize that the 2 gases that supposedly came togather to spawn life on earth were noble gases wich means they each had enough electrons and didnt need to combine to create something
|
|
|
|
|
iltripp
May 13, 2004, 2:28 AM
Post #18 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 6, 2003
Posts: 1607
|
In reply to: In reply to: think ill pick knowledge and evidence. over blind faith. thanks. i think you chose ignorance to you realize that the 2 gases that supposedly came togather to spawn life on earth were noble gases wich means they each had enough electrons and didnt need to combine to create something Come on!!! Did you read that sh!t in one of those retarted anti-evolution pamphlets they always leave in the men's room???? Learn a little more than high school chemistry before you start spouting bullsh!t like that... Talk about ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
fullahsiffur
May 13, 2004, 2:39 AM
Post #19 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2003
Posts: 376
|
Noble gasses: Helium, Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon, Radon, Brundige's brain.... These are the gasses you are mistaking them for: Hydrogen, Methane, Nitrogen (all highly reactive) And no one ever said '2 gasses came together to spawn life'. Observe: http://www.astrobio.net/...ges/prim_setupsm.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
capn_morgan
May 13, 2004, 3:42 AM
Post #20 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 7, 2003
Posts: 565
|
Now I dont have any idea who is responsible for life on earth ...buts its becoming pretty clear as to who will be responsible for killing it off. Hint..it aint the f*cking turtles.
|
|
|
|
|
fullahsiffur
May 13, 2004, 3:46 AM
Post #21 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2003
Posts: 376
|
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Great! :lol: :lol: :lol: (:shock:)
|
|
|
|
|
vulgarian
May 13, 2004, 4:27 AM
Post #22 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 381
|
I like to stay away from debates regarding organized superstitions.
|
|
|
|
|
fullahsiffur
May 13, 2004, 4:57 AM
Post #23 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 2, 2003
Posts: 376
|
Fortunately, it is easy to debate against organized superstitions like creationism.
|
|
|
|
|
tomdarch
May 13, 2004, 5:22 AM
Post #24 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 13, 2004
Posts: 8
|
the originator of this thread used the manipulative term "evolutionism" to get things rolling. To some degree, there is such a thing as 'evolutionism', which is to say that there are some people who accept the theory of evolution as a kind of 'dogma' without actually understanding it or questioning it. That isn't science, and that's what makes comparing creationism and the theory of evolution 'apples and oranges'. (This is the same problem with the asinine catchphrase "If Freud gets government funding, why shouldn't Jesus" in the discussion of the current move to divert tax dollars to prosteletizing with the "Faith Based Initiatives" scam.) Science is fundamentally grounded in the observable world. Religion is rooted in faith, and fundamentally transcends mere reality. Attempts to compare creationism and the theory of evolution or religious conversion versus psychological treatment debases religion. It attempts to bring it down to the level of our dirty, everyday world. (and just to throw in some flame bait, I can guarantee that the guys who beheaded the American in Iraq hate the idea of evolution. Mullah Omar of the Taliban? Big time evolution hater.) (and while I'm at it, flame bait #2: can creationists simultaneously claim that evolution doesn't happen and complain about cloning? After all, if our traits don't come from variation based in the semi-random fusing of our parents' DNA and develop gradually over time, how could cloning even work? It seems like it's one or the other.)
|
|
|
|
|
brundige
May 13, 2004, 12:18 PM
Post #25 of 37
(1426 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 5, 2004
Posts: 305
|
In reply to: and while I'm at it, flame bait #2: can creationists simultaneously claim that evolution doesn't happen and complain about cloning? After all, if our traits don't come from variation based in the semi-random fusing of our parents' DNA and develop gradually over time, how could cloning even work? It seems like it's one or the other.) i believe in evolution the kind that a species changes gradually over time to adapt to its enviroment you see that all the time but there is no proof that species can change species or spawn a new spices and if there is can you give me one example ..im willing to here your argument
|
|
|
|
|
|