|
el_layclimber
Nov 16, 2010, 9:27 AM
Post #2 of 79
(21668 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 9, 2006
Posts: 550
|
Good shit.
|
|
|
|
|
Toast_in_the_Machine
Nov 16, 2010, 12:27 PM
Post #3 of 79
(21647 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
Thank you for posting that.
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 16, 2010, 3:15 PM
Post #4 of 79
(21617 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Must...Climb....Hard...Scary...Route...That looks like such an awesome climb. Too bad 11c is the hardest thing I've redpointed. Guess I'll have to get a bit stronger before I check that puppy out.
|
|
|
|
|
fresh
Nov 19, 2010, 9:24 PM
Post #5 of 79
(21468 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 7, 2007
Posts: 1199
|
jmeizis wrote: Must...Climb....Hard...Scary...Route...That looks like such an awesome climb. Too bad 11c is the hardest thing I've redpointed. Guess I'll have to get a bit stronger before I check that puppy out. according to the man himself, it's no tougher than 11a: "The hardest move is 5.11a at the first bolt, first pitch (bring a small loop of 4mm and 5mm cord to tie off a knob about 15 -20 feet up on the first pitch - as well as some second knuckle size cams to protect the layback flake). Second pitch is 10d continuous. Third is 10c - old school slab cruxes with inbetween 10a runouts. 5.9 crack and easy face to the summit. All bolts have been replaced by me and Dave Shultz - bomber 3/8" Taper Bolts of course! Piece o' cake, jb " http://www.supertopo.com/...75380/Bachar-Yerrian
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 19, 2010, 10:49 PM
Post #6 of 79
(21438 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Eeeek, that's like right at the edge of my comfort level onsight wise. Most of the time I do...but sometimes I don't. Not necessarily that style though. Might have to make a trip out there next fall. See how I feel with the area and style of climbing. Have to get on some of Bachar's routes and see if he was a sandbagger! I can't help but get all psyched watching those sort of videos with the hard scary climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 19, 2010, 11:01 PM
Post #7 of 79
(21396 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Eeeek, that's like right at the edge of my comfort level onsight wise. Most of the time I do...but sometimes I don't. Not necessarily that style though. Might have to make a trip out there next fall. See how I feel with the area and style of climbing. Have to get on some of Bachar's routes and see if he was a sandbagger! I can't help but get all psyched watching those sort of videos with the hard scary climbing. Are you seriously suggesting that you're anywhere near capable of leading the Bachar–Yerian? Jay
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Nov 20, 2010, 1:12 AM
Post #8 of 79
(21347 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
jt512 wrote: jmeizis wrote: Eeeek, that's like right at the edge of my comfort level onsight wise. Most of the time I do...but sometimes I don't. Not necessarily that style though. Might have to make a trip out there next fall. See how I feel with the area and style of climbing. Have to get on some of Bachar's routes and see if he was a sandbagger! I can't help but get all psyched watching those sort of videos with the hard scary climbing. Are you seriously suggesting that you're anywhere near capable of leading the Bachar–Yerian? Jay I think with a week of training he's got that thing in the bag.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 20, 2010, 2:31 AM
Post #9 of 79
(21323 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
caughtinside wrote: jt512 wrote: jmeizis wrote: Eeeek, that's like right at the edge of my comfort level onsight wise. Most of the time I do...but sometimes I don't. Not necessarily that style though. Might have to make a trip out there next fall. See how I feel with the area and style of climbing. Have to get on some of Bachar's routes and see if he was a sandbagger! I can't help but get all psyched watching those sort of videos with the hard scary climbing. Are you seriously suggesting that you're anywhere near capable of leading the Bachar–Yerian? Jay I think with a week of training he's got that thing in the bag. Good point. He on-sights 11a usually. He probably just needs to tune up a bit. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 20, 2010, 3:40 AM
Post #10 of 79
(21300 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Near capable, yes. Ready, hell no. I'm fine leading scary things at my limit in styles that I'm good at like crack climbs (which don't generally have runouts) and technical routes. Bachar-Yerian sounds like it might be one of those but I haven't checked out much info on the route. Sorry when I said I was psyched watching videos like that I didn't mean to suggest that I was going to pump myself up to go and do it next week. I'd definately want to spend some time in the area familiarizing myself with the climbing style and some of Bachar's other routes to see how he graded things and how well I climbed in the given style. It definately doesn't look or sound like the sort of climb I'd just go walk up and jump on because it has the same grade as some other climbs I've onsighted.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 20, 2010, 6:05 AM
Post #11 of 79
(21275 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Near capable, yes. Ready, hell no. I'm fine leading scary things at my limit in styles that I'm good at like crack climbs (which don't generally have runouts) and technical routes. Bachar-Yerian sounds like it might be one of those but I haven't checked out much info on the route. Sorry when I said I was psyched watching videos like that I didn't mean to suggest that I was going to pump myself up to go and do it next week. I'd definately want to spend some time in the area familiarizing myself with the climbing style and some of Bachar's other routes to see how he graded things and how well I climbed in the given style. It definately doesn't look or sound like the sort of climb I'd just go walk up and jump on because it has the same grade as some other climbs I've onsighted. Hilarious. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 20, 2010, 3:15 PM
Post #12 of 79
(21241 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
It's too bad your mother didn't smother you when you were a child, then the rest of us wouldn't have to deal with your personality.
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Nov 20, 2010, 4:33 PM
Post #13 of 79
(21222 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
jmeizis wrote: It's too bad your mother didn't smother you when you were a child, then the rest of us wouldn't have to deal with your personality. And in your case, your ego and hubris. How can anyone who calls themselves a climber (and spills their guts on GumbyBurns blog) "...not know much about..." the Bachar-Yerian? Seriously? That's like saying "The Nose? Yeah, I think I heard of that once."
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 20, 2010, 4:40 PM
Post #14 of 79
(21220 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
marc801 wrote: jmeizis wrote: It's too bad your mother didn't smother you when you were a child, then the rest of us wouldn't have to deal with your personality. And in your case, your ego and hubris. How can anyone who calls themselves a climber (and spills their guts on GumbyBurns blog) "...not know much about..." the Bachar-Yerian? Seriously? That's like saying "The Nose? Yeah, I think I heard of that once." Actually, he calls himself a guide. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 21, 2010, 2:04 AM
Post #15 of 79
(21158 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
No, I'd heard of the Bachar-Yerian, and knew where it was before I ever saw that video. It's like saying I know what The Nose is but I don't know the grade or style of climbing on every pitch. If I was planning on going to do it I'd get a topo and start checking it out. Sorry to get everyone's panties in a bunch. Apparently the line between self confidence and ego/hubris is a thin one.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 21, 2010, 2:11 AM
Post #16 of 79
(21154 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: No, I'd heard of the Bachar-Yerian, and knew where it was before I ever saw that video. It's like saying I know what The Nose is but I don't know the grade or style of climbing on every pitch. If I was planning on going to do it I'd get a topo and start checking it out. Sorry to get everyone's panties in a bunch. Apparently the line between self confidence and ego/hubris is a thin one. It's pretty obvious which side of the line you're on when you imply that your trad skill is essentially equal to John Bachar's in his heyday. Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Nov 21, 2010, 2:19 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Nov 21, 2010, 2:16 AM
Post #17 of 79
(21149 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
Self confidence is good, but the posts mostly demonstrate ignorance of the route. Which is ok, you don't have to know everything about every route, but it's just funny to those familiar with it because of the history, style and notoriety of tuolumnes most famous sport route. Thanks for the laughs.
|
|
|
|
|
moose_droppings
Nov 21, 2010, 2:29 AM
Post #18 of 79
(21137 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 7, 2005
Posts: 3371
|
caughtinside wrote: Self confidence is good, but the posts mostly demonstrate ignorance of the route. Which is ok, you don't have to know everything about every route, but it's just funny to those familiar with it because of the history, style and notoriety of tuolumnes most famous sport route. Thanks for the laughs. Are you talking about the B/Y route? I'm thinking it's a trad route.
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 21, 2010, 3:12 AM
Post #19 of 79
(21124 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Given the change in equipment, training methods, and what people are doing these days, it's not too far fetched to think that regular people can ascend to that level of ability. Physically or mentally. Your video post so much as makes that point. Given that you know little about how well I climb it's a little presumptious of you to just assume it's outside of my ability. It's not like I came out and said pfft, Bachar-Yerian, easy as pie. That would certainly be hubris. What I said was that, given what I know about the route, it's right at the cusp of my climbing ability. I also admitted I don't know much about the route except it's location and the grade and that I would want to climb in the area for a while before deciding to check it out. That doesn't seem like hubris, that seems like being cautious and working up to it. I don't see the part where I said I could totally go out their and crush it no problem. Obviously it's a serious route but it's really unfortunate when other climbers take such a negative attitude towards the aspirations of others, especially others they don't know. How sad is your life if you have to take a dump on the lives of others?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 21, 2010, 3:59 AM
Post #20 of 79
(21111 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Given the change in equipment, training methods, and what people are doing these days, it's not too far fetched to think that regular people can ascend to that level of ability. Physically or mentally. Your video post so much as makes that point. First of all, I've watched Andrew Rock climb, and if he implied that he was an ordinary climber then he was being very humble. That said, of course "regular people" can ascend to that level of ability. But they actually have to ascend. You said that you have onsighted some 5.11a routes. If you think that that means that you are anywhere near ready to tackle a Tuolumne Meadows 5.11c R/X route, then you are dangerously delusional.
In reply to: Given that you know little about how well I climb . . . I know quite a lot about how well you climb. First of all, you wrote in this very thread that you onsight some 5.11a's. Secondly, you've been blogging about and posting about your climbing adventures and misadventures for quite some time now. Considering that you have implied that you might be ready to lead the Bachar–Yerian, in spite of the fact that it is at least two letter grades above your 50% onsight level and is rated R/X, a good case can be made that I know more about your climbing abilities than you do.
In reply to: What I said was that, given what I know about the route, it's right at the cusp of my climbing ability. Which speaks to either your ignorance of the route or your ignorance of your climbing ability, or, in all likelihood, both.
In reply to: I also admitted I don't know much about the route except it's location and the grade and that I would want to climb in the area for a while before deciding to check it out. That doesn't seem like hubris, that seems like being cautious and working up to it. I don't see the part where I said I could totally go out their and crush it no problem. That would be a reasonable thing to (finally) say were it not for the fact that the route is simply out of your league—which is not to say that some day you might be able to do it.
In reply to: Obviously it's a serious route but it's really unfortunate when other climbers take such a negative attitude towards the aspirations of others... Straw man. Nobody is dumping on your or anybody else's aspiration. Nobody has even remotely suggested that you shouldn't aspire to the Bachar–Yerian, or even that someday you could even cruise it. What we are disparaging is your grossly inflated image of your climbing ability—precisely the same thing that we have been disparaging ever since you started blogging about your "guiding" adventures, as if you were the reincarnation of Anatoli Boukreev.
In reply to: How sad is your life if you have to take a dump on the lives of others? Nobody is "dumping on the lives of others," whatever that even means. We (and it certainly isn't just me) are simply pointing out that you, as usual, are grossly overestimating your status in the world of rock climbing. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 21, 2010, 5:21 AM
Post #21 of 79
(21090 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
In reply to: First of all, I've watched Andrew Rock climb.... That said, of course "regular people" ... While he's obviously a very good climber, what is it about him, or anyone in this thread that's out of the ordinary? I also think you missed the link where J.B. himself said no move was harder than 5.11a. Whether that was a joke or what I don't know. I'd assume it was a joke because from everything else I've read it sounds like the crux is a V4 boulder problem and most of the route sounds like a face climb on vertical and gently overhanging rock. Doing a V4 boulder problem and then a bunch of 5.11 moves I would say is a little ways outside of my ability. I've got plenty of stamina for 5.11 moves, question is whether I could pull the crux, then do a bunch of 5.11 moves. I might be able to pull some V4 moves and I'm pretty confident I can do many 5.11 moves. I'm relatively sure I can't do both and fairly sure I don't have the endurance to do an entire pitch of 5.11 moves. I still haven't ever seen the climb in person so for all I know it's twenty degrees overhanging with two full pitches of 5.11+/5.11 moves back to back which would be a fair bit above my ability.
In reply to: I know quite a lot about how well you climb. ... I think there's a little miscommunication. I might be close to being ready, definately not ready. Large difference. If I inferred that I was ready to go then I mispoke. Aside from that I onsight 5.11a more often than not, probably about 75% of the time, a lot of that includes vertical or slightly overhanging face climbing. Since I've never seen the climb it's really hard to say whether it's a little outside of my ability or a ways outside of my ability. I'd be remiss to take advice from anyone who hasn't seen me climb and hasn't done the climb themselves.
In reply to: Which speaks to either your ignorance of the route or your ignorance of your climbing ability, or, in all likelihood, both. Might be a little bit of both, more than likely it's my lack of knowledge of the area, the style of climbing, and the route itself. I haven't had an accident climbing so I must have a fairly good idea of how well I climb since I haven't gotten so far out of my depth to get hurt. If California is as soft as Colorado then it might be only 5.11a.
In reply to: That would be a reasonable thing to (finally) say were it not for the fact that the route is simply out of your league—which is not to say that some day you might be able to do it. I guess I wasn't clear at the beginning of the thread where I said I would definately want to do climbs in the area and see if J.B. was a sandbagger. Now when you say "out of your league" you infer a seperation of ability that's more than a few letter grades, you make it sound like a 5.10+/5.11- climber going for 5.13X, not 5.11/11+X
In reply to: Straw man. Nobody is dumping... No, it has nothing to do with the argument about whether or not I have the abilitty to climb the B/Y. It's just a comment on the way you speak with others, not just me. What you've pretty much been saying is that I'm not even close to being capable of doing that route. The way you said it was fairly disparaging. Whether that was intentional or you just don't realize how you come off to others I have no idea but the meaning behind the words might as well have been "you suck at climbing and I doubt you'll ever have the skill or balls to do this."
In reply to: Nobody is "dumping on the lives of others," whatever ... If you're trying to make your point stick you might try to avoid insulting someone's abilities or their intelligence. People tend to not listen as much after that. I think you're the only one who's done that.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Nov 21, 2010, 5:36 AM
Post #22 of 79
(21083 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
I'll go ahead and say it then... that route is very far out of your league. But that's true of 99.9% of the climbing population. So don't feel bad... but it's funny to watch you spout about the route, what you climb, the dreams of others, etc. You're not leading it anytime soon.
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 21, 2010, 5:55 AM
Post #23 of 79
(21072 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
You've never even seen me climb. I have a feeling that you, and everyone else who said it, is probably right but I still am not about to let somebody on the internet tell me what I can't do. I'll let someone in person impart the common sense. I don't feel bad, nor take anything on this site seriously. I'd definately like to climb in Tuolumne and check it out. If I did look at it and seriously consider doing it sometime in the future (probably not near future) I'd probably study it a lot more carefully than any route I'd ever done. It's a hard, runout climb. Gotta feel good about doing the moves, not just capable of scratching by on the skin of your teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Nov 21, 2010, 6:02 AM
Post #24 of 79
(21068 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
I don't need to see you climb to tell you that just from what I've read in this thread, you are nowhere near capable of leading this route. Although I don't think anyone who has posted in this thread is either.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 21, 2010, 6:17 AM
Post #25 of 79
(21058 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
caughtinside wrote: I don't need to see you climb to tell you that just from what I've read in this thread, you are nowhere near capable of leading this route. Although I don't think anyone who has posted in this thread is either. According to Jan (Andrew's second), Andrew spent nine months of dedicated training to lead the Bachar–Yerian. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if I spent a full year of training dedicated to leading just that route that I could do it. You too, maybe in less time. Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Nov 21, 2010, 6:19 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 21, 2010, 6:41 AM
Post #26 of 79
(10341 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
What'd he do to train for it?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 21, 2010, 7:03 AM
Post #27 of 79
(10331 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: What'd he do to train for it? I don't know much more than he states in the video. His main goal was to train endurance, so that he wouldn't get pumped on the route; but seriously, he has years more experience climbing than you, and, I suspect is superior to you in every aspect of climbing: endurance, power, technique, breadth of experience, depth of experience, mental control, gear, etc., etc., etc. Way more than me too. But you're the one claiming to be on the "cusp" of being able to lead the Bachar–Yerrian. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 21, 2010, 3:22 PM
Post #28 of 79
(10303 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Yeah, I got that in the video when he pretty much cruised the route. Wasn't enough to bring him up and say he was a really good climber. Had to knock someone (me in this case) down a peg. I'm gonna guess your job either involves little interaction with people or enough interaction that it pisses you off and you take it out on others. That or you don't realise your backhanded comments make you sound like an ass.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 21, 2010, 6:19 PM
Post #29 of 79
(10275 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Yeah, I got that in the video when he pretty much cruised the route. Wasn't enough to bring him up and say he was a really good climber. Had to knock someone (me in this case) down a peg. Huh? You're the one making the grossly arrogant and erroneous claim that you're "on the cusp" of being ready to lead the Bachar–Yerian. Since you are claiming to be a better climber than you are, any statement about the claim being false necessarily implies that you're not as good a climber as you think you are. If that offends you it is your own fault for having a grossly inflated opinion of your climbing ability.
In reply to: I'm gonna guess your job either involves little interaction with people or enough interaction that it pisses you off and you take it out on others. That or you don't realise your backhanded comments make you sound like an ass. This is the second blatant, false, and desperate ad hominem attack you've made against me in this thread. What you are doing is obvious: tying to deflect the criticism away from yourself, and onto me; trying to make me the subject of conversation, rather than attempt to defend your own arrogant claims and n00bris. "Ad hominem: attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument."—Dictionary.com Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Nov 21, 2010, 6:19 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
MS1
Nov 21, 2010, 8:01 PM
Post #30 of 79
(10254 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
Just to give you a sense of the route's history: http://www.supertopo.com/...id=1045687&tn=20 This is a route that spit off Wolfgang Gullich, and this was on the second (non-crux) pitch! This is a very different kind of "10d" than what you may be used to. Add the R/X consequences of fucking it up, and it makes for an extremely serious undertaking. Ergo, people are making fun of you for having a casual attitude about one of the scariest climbs in California.
|
|
|
|
|
marc801
Nov 21, 2010, 9:38 PM
Post #31 of 79
(10236 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 1, 2005
Posts: 2806
|
MS1 wrote: Ergo, people are making fun of you for having a casual attitude about one of the scariest climbs in California America. Adjusted that for ya!
|
|
|
|
|
theguy
Nov 22, 2010, 12:20 AM
Post #32 of 79
(10199 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 469
|
jt512 wrote: ...Since you are claiming to be a better climber than you are, any statement about the claim being false necessarily implies that you're not as good a climber as you think you are. If that offends you it is your own fault for having a grossly inflated opinion of your climbing ability. In reply to: I'm gonna guess that...you don't realise your backhanded comments make you sound like an ass. This is the second blatant, false, and desperate ad hominem attack you've made against me in this thread. Jay Nice job Jay, hoist by your own petard :) Since you a) claim that if one takes offense at accurate comments it is one's own fault (and presumably not due to an attack, ad hominem or otherwise), b) take offense and claim an ad hominem attack it follows that you believe the poster's guesses to be false, and therefore do "realise your backhanded comments make you sound like an ass." Well, at least we're all on the same page now
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 1:18 AM
Post #33 of 79
(10185 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
This ain't debate team buddy. There's no winning here. If you actually read what I wrote I said 5.11a was at the edge of my comfort level for onsighting and that it'd be cool to check the route out (ie look at it). This was in response to someone saying that J.B. himself said it wasn't harder than 5.11a. When you asked if I seriously thought I was capable of leading it I said I might be near capable but definately not ready. That was a no in case you didn't catch it. Reading comprehension can be tricky. Also keep in mind I said might. I used that word specifically because I didn't know all that much about the route except that it was hard, historic, runout, and in Tuolumne. I've since then admitted that it's probably farther out of my league than I thought. If you want to debate whether I'm near capable of leading it then you're an idiot because "near capable" is a broad area. You and all the other people who can't read decided you had to jump in and tell me how dumb I was for even thinking I had so much as a chance of leading it. Then I used the word "cusp" which you seem very focused on for some reason while in the same sentence I also said, "given what I know about the route". Basically admitting I knew little about how hard it actually may be. Grades are subjective so the original use of the word nearly was intentional in it's broadness. Did I misuse the word "cusp", perhaps. Is the route so far out of my league to make it silly to think about it in the next few years. Eh, maybe. Do I pigeonhole myself as not good enough because so and so fell off of it or because some loser on the internet says I'm stupid for even considering it? No. Even if I'd said it looks easy there's no need to get your lycra in a bunch. The nice thing about rock climbing is that you either have to put up or shut up. So even if I were dumb enough to go and do it tomorrow I wouldn't need your stupid comments to determine whether it was at the "cusp" of my ability. Climbing tends to self correct those who reach too far beyond what they should. I know my abilities very well and regardless of whether I mispoke about being "near capable" of climbing it I'd know as soon as I looked at it in person how close or far it was from my abilities. I don't need some egotistical sport climber who flails his way up 5.12 to tell me what I can and can't do. Get a life.
|
|
|
|
|
boulderkitty
Nov 22, 2010, 2:59 AM
Post #34 of 79
(10162 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 19
|
great video!
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 22, 2010, 3:53 AM
Post #35 of 79
(10141 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: This ain't debate team buddy. There's no winning here. If you actually read what I wrote I said 5.11a was at the edge of my comfort level for onsighting and that it'd be cool to check the route out (ie look at it). This was in response to someone saying that J.B. himself said it wasn't harder than 5.11a. When you asked if I seriously thought I was capable of leading it I said I might be near capable but definately not ready. That was a no in case you didn't catch it. Reading comprehension can be tricky. So can honesty, apparently. Let me clarify something that everybody on this website except you understands: you are not even remotely "near capable" of leading the Bachar–Yerian. It's not just out of your league, it's out of the league that's above your league, and the next league above that. The route gets done a few times a year by the world's elite trad climbers. It is a world-class trad test piece and you are no world-class trad climber.
In reply to: You and all the other people who can't read decided you had to jump in and tell me how dumb I was for even thinking I had so much as a chance of leading it. We can all read quite well, thank you. But perhaps you can't. We didn't say you were dumb; we said you were arrogant.
In reply to: Then I used the word "cusp" which you seem very focused on for some reason while in the same sentence I also said, "given what I know about the route". In other words, given your ignorance of the route, you might be on the cusp of leading it. Well, you can qualify any statement about anything you're ignorant of and make the vacuously true statement: Given my ignorance of X, I might be able to do X.
In reply to: Is the route so far out of my league to make it silly to think about it in the next few years. Eh, maybe. At least your trend of back pedaling is in the right direction. You've gone from "cusp" to "next few years."
In reply to: Climbing tends to self correct those who reach too far beyond what they should. And when the route is R/X, the correction can be permanent.
In reply to: I know my abilities very well and regardless of whether I mispoke about being "near capable" of climbing it I'd know as soon as I looked at it in person how close or far it was from my abilities. Instead of writing in paragraph after paragraph in post after post an unending string of ad hominem attacks that you hope will shift the focus of attention away from you, and back pedaling that you hope will be gradual enough enough to escape notice, wouldn't it be simpler and more honest to just admit that your original statement was wrong, and that you now realize that the route is way above your present abilities?
In reply to: I don't need some egotistical sport climber who flails his way up 5.12 to tell me what I can and can't do. Get a life. It is comical, given the claims you've made in this thread, that you accuse me of being egotistical. And, BTW, this "sport climber" has climbed harder trad than you for more years than you've been climbing in your entire paltry career. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
billl7
Nov 22, 2010, 3:58 AM
Post #36 of 79
(10140 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 1890
|
High quality - thanks. for posting it.
|
|
|
|
|
MS1
Nov 22, 2010, 4:33 AM
Post #37 of 79
(10126 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 24, 2009
Posts: 560
|
marc801 wrote: MS1 wrote: Ergo, people are making fun of you for having a casual attitude about one of the scariest climbs in California America. Adjusted that for ya! No quibbles here.
|
|
|
|
|
dynosore
Nov 22, 2010, 4:39 AM
Post #38 of 79
(10122 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 29, 2004
Posts: 1768
|
There's a big difference between being able to pull 5.11 moves and having the confidence and control to climb a route like B-Y. I max out at 5.11 sport on lead, that doesn't mean I'm able to do a route like B-Y. I've seen the route and there's no doubt in my mind it's waayy out of my league.
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 5:19 AM
Post #39 of 79
(10108 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Forgive me if I don't just take your word for it. Especially since you haven't climbed it. Honesty is only available in the light of actual facts. Having not climbed the route it's not yet a fact that I can't climb it. While it's highly likely that I can't, it is not yet a fact. Though I never said I could. Essentially the whole conversation about whether it is or is not near my abilities is stupid because until I try it there's no way to actually know, everything before that is simply predictions. The predictions might prove accurate but action has to actually be taken to prove them so. Arrogant, dumb, the sentiment behind the words is similar enough that I don't feel the need to nitpick about it. Sounds like an ad hominem argument to me. We already talked about the whole "cusp/near capable" thing. Indeed ignorance of something makes it pretty easy to claim the possible ability to handle it. You're begging the question. Just because several climbers who don't know me and have never seen me climb said I can't doesn't make it a fact. You're also appealing to a belief that because other climbers found it hard then it must in fact be too hard and scary for me. I passed philosophy 101 as well. The correction can indeed be permanent. Never said I bought a plane ticket to go try it now did I? As I've said several times previously, it's hard to admit to knowing anything useful about something that I don't have the opportunity to get a tangible grasp of. Looking at pictures, hearing descriptions and watching videos are not the same as actually standing at the bottom and looking at it. Like I said, gotta put up or shut up. My original statement could only be proven wrong by me going out and failing on the route. Since I like having the use of my legs there is no way to actually verify where it lies in relation to my current abilities. That's part of what makes climbing interesting is not knowing for sure if you can do a climb until you're clipping the anchors or standing at the top. We all have our expectations based on the info available. Given the info I had available when I first made the comment (a comment that was obviously not made with a great deal of knowledge of the route) it didn't seem like an arrogant comment. As new information has come to my attention I've altered the way I feel about the route. While I don't agree that it's leagues and leagues above me I have already admitted it's probably farther outside of my ability than I first thought watching the video. The pictures I've seen make it look much steeper and harder than the video you posted. Were I to stand underneath it I may feel it even further out of my grasp. As for your climbing ability, somehow I doubt it. But since I haven't had the opportunity to climb with you it would be presumptuous of me to call bullshit. Intersting how you have no problem being so presumptuous. Considering how long I've been climbing in comparison to you I have little doubt in my mind that if I'm not a better climber than you already I will very likely surpass your best climbing years with relative ease.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 22, 2010, 5:39 AM
Post #40 of 79
(10097 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Having not climbed the route it's not yet a fact that I can't climb it. While it's highly likely that I can't, it is not yet a fact. Though I never said I could. Quoted for posterity. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Nov 22, 2010, 5:53 AM
Post #41 of 79
(10092 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
caughtinside wrote: I don't need to see you climb to tell you that just from what I've read in this thread, you are nowhere near capable of leading this route. Although I don't think anyone who has posted in this thread is either. I for one think he can do it. Jeremiah, don't listen to these guys, you can do anything you set your mind to. It'd be sweet if you didn't do a bunch of specialized training and beta research either, go old school with it. Just be sure to line up a cameraman because these guys will never take your word for it. That and the rest of us would definitely like to see the footage. Get on that shit!
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 5:56 AM
Post #42 of 79
(10089 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Good for you.
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 22, 2010, 6:10 AM
Post #43 of 79
(10083 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
notapplicable wrote: caughtinside wrote: I don't need to see you climb to tell you that just from what I've read in this thread, you are nowhere near capable of leading this route. Although I don't think anyone who has posted in this thread is either. I for one think he can do it. Jeremiah, don't listen to these guys, you can do anything you set your mind to. It'd be sweet if you didn't do a bunch of specialized training and beta research either, go old school with it. Just be sure to line up a cameraman because these guys will never take your word for it. That and the rest of us would definitely like to see the footage. Get on that shit! Not to disparage your post, as I can certainly sympathize with your sentiments, but I've tried my damnedest not to make the "you're right; go for it" post. After all, it's an R/X route that is orders of magnitude beyond this n00b's ability. However, I have to admit that the more he piles on the incessant ad hominem attacks the harder it is for me to resist making the "go for it" post. As awful as it is to admit, there might just be a level of abuse beyond which I'm willing to suggest that someone do something that could cost them life or limb that, out of there own ignorance and arrogance, they believe they are competent to do. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 6:41 AM
Post #44 of 79
(10078 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
Once again, there's a difference between a belief and reality. Just because I believe it is something I could do in the future doesn't mean I'd just go out there and do it without trying some of the other testpieces that probably come in line before it. What is it that makes you think you're so much better than everyone else? Pretty sure the entire basis of your argument that I can't do it is just because you think I'm a noob, an ad hominem attack in itself. Maybe you should read my post above.
(This post was edited by jmeizis on Nov 22, 2010, 6:44 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Nov 22, 2010, 6:51 AM
Post #45 of 79
(10072 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
jt512 wrote: notapplicable wrote: caughtinside wrote: I don't need to see you climb to tell you that just from what I've read in this thread, you are nowhere near capable of leading this route. Although I don't think anyone who has posted in this thread is either. I for one think he can do it. Jeremiah, don't listen to these guys, you can do anything you set your mind to. It'd be sweet if you didn't do a bunch of specialized training and beta research either, go old school with it. Just be sure to line up a cameraman because these guys will never take your word for it. That and the rest of us would definitely like to see the footage. Get on that shit! Not to disparage your post, as I can certainly sympathize with your sentiments, but I've tried my damnedest not to make the "you're right; go for it" post. After all, it's an R/X route that is orders of magnitude beyond this n00b's ability. However, I have to admit that the more he piles on the incessant ad hominem attacks the harder it is for me to resist making the "go for it" post. As awful as it is to admit, there might just be a level of abuse beyond which I'm willing to suggest that someone do something that could cost them life or limb that, out of there own ignorance and arrogance, they believe they are competent to do. Jay Ha! I knew there was a warm and fuzzy teddy bear deep down inside of you just waiting to reach out and hug the world! Ok, so I many have over sold it a bit but yeah, I admire your restraint in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Nov 22, 2010, 4:10 PM
Post #46 of 79
(10045 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
jmeizis wrote: Once again, there's a difference between a belief and reality. Just because I believe it is something I could do in the future doesn't mean I'd just go out there and do it without trying some of the other testpieces that probably come in line before it. What is it that makes you think you're so much better than everyone else? Pretty sure the entire basis of your argument that I can't do it is just because you think I'm a noob, an ad hominem attack in itself. Maybe you should read my post above. I cannot believe you're responding to anything that's been posted in this thread. You really don't need to defend yourself to any of these guys. I'm not saying they're wrong, but I just don't see why you'd defend your climbing level (or yourself) so vehemently to complete strangers. Chalk it all up to miscommunication and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
camhead
Nov 22, 2010, 4:11 PM
Post #47 of 79
(10042 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 20939
|
jt512 wrote: caughtinside wrote: I don't need to see you climb to tell you that just from what I've read in this thread, you are nowhere near capable of leading this route. Although I don't think anyone who has posted in this thread is either. According to Jan (Andrew's second), Andrew spent nine months of dedicated training to lead the Bachar–Yerian. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that if I spent a full year of training dedicated to leading just that route that I could do it. You too, maybe in less time. Jay Caughtinside definitely has what it takes to climb B-Y. I mean, this is the guy who, in one day, sent the warmup at the WNSG! Free shoes!
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 4:51 PM
Post #48 of 79
(10018 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
It's less about the whole miscommunication thing and more about people telling others what they can and can't climb. For someone, anyone, to talk down to other climbers just gets under my skin. It's one thing to caution someone and suggest they look into something like that a little more carefully. It's entirely different to basically berate them about how they have no idea what they're talking about. I don't believe it to just be an annoyance, I think it's detrimental to the sport as a whole to have that elitist crap floating around. Not to say I'm without guilt but I don't make a habit of it.
(This post was edited by jmeizis on Nov 22, 2010, 5:16 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
redlude97
Nov 22, 2010, 5:11 PM
Post #49 of 79
(10004 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990
|
jmeizis wrote: It's less about the whole miscommunication thing and more about people telling others what they can and can't climb. For someone, anyone, to talk down to other climbers just gets under my skin. It's one thing to caution someone and suggest they look into something like that a little more carefully. It's entirely different to basically berate them about how they have no idea what they're talking about. I don't believe to just be an annoyance, I think it's detrimental to the sport as a whole to have that elitist crap floating around. Not to say I'm without guilt but I don't make a habit of it. It is elitist to claim you are on the cusp of climbing the B-Y without having ever even seen it and only onsighting 5.11a sometimes....
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 5:18 PM
Post #50 of 79
(9991 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
It's elitist for someone to say they might be close to being able to climb something? Well that pretty much encompasses everyone on this sight. Guess we're all guilty.
|
|
|
|
|
dreday3000
Nov 22, 2010, 5:21 PM
Post #51 of 79
(8127 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 566
|
The crux actually look well protected to me. I realize that climbing something like BY is more about keeping your head together than a technical cruxes but on the whole I thought the video was pretty encouraging for someone that wants to take a stab at it. The trick of course, is separating the wheat from chaff.
|
|
|
|
|
redlude97
Nov 22, 2010, 5:24 PM
Post #52 of 79
(8123 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990
|
jmeizis wrote: It's elitist for someone to say they might be close to being able to climb something? Well that pretty much encompasses everyone on this sight. Guess we're all guilty. No. This isn't a route you do because you think you can pull v4 and 5.11 moves. You don't redpoint the B-Y. By claiming such tha you are lumping yourself with a group of very elite climbers and putting yourself above many climbers who pull much harder than you and have the humility to look at the B-Y, know the implications of not sending and saying "no effing way"
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 5:34 PM
Post #53 of 79
(8109 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
I'm not lumping myself in with anyone. In fact I avoid lumping myself in with anyone because every climb is different as is every climber. I never said I was going to go redpoint the B/Y or try to. Maybe read the thread more carefully. Slim chance I could, likely I can't. I'm not going to say "no effing way" without looking at it. I'm not going to tersely discourage someone else from thinking about it even if I know for a fact that I'm loads stronger than them and I'm not thinking of doing it. I definately would not do so if I had never seen them climb or been on the climb they were referring to.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Nov 22, 2010, 5:40 PM
Post #54 of 79
(8101 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
jmeizis wrote: It's less about the whole miscommunication thing and more about people telling others what they can and can't climb. For someone, anyone, to talk down to other climbers just gets under my skin. It's one thing to caution someone and suggest they look into something like that a little more carefully. It's entirely different to basically berate them about how they have no idea what they're talking about. I don't believe it to just be an annoyance, I think it's detrimental to the sport as a whole to have that elitist crap floating around. Not to say I'm without guilt but I don't make a habit of it. Drama queen. Honestly, I agree with them. I'd agree with your berating comment, but it really seems like you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to B-Y. It seems like you looked at the grade, watched a video of it, and made a bunch of assumptions. An average sport climb established in the last decade may be taken at face value from it's grade, but this is just simply a totally different monster. If you'd described it as some kind of long-term goal, you probably would have received a positive response. Let the haters hate. Let's say you changed their opinion. So what? For every hater on this site, there's ten times as many out there. People just not need to be fragile and easily affected by them.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Nov 22, 2010, 5:53 PM
Post #55 of 79
(8090 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
In reply to: Near capable, yes. . . . I'm fine leading scary things at my limit in styles that I'm good at like crack climbs (which don't generally have runouts) and technical routes. Bachar-Yerian sounds like it might be one of those but I haven't checked out much info on the route. Fact: You claimed to be "[nearly] capable" of climbing an infamous route based upon a video and a grade. Seems to me everyone was responding to this, which is not an expression of your aspirations, but rather of your current capabilities. You immediately followed the claim by saying that you "haven't check out much info on the route." I mean, honestly? You shouldn't make a statement about how you're nearly capable of doing something and then immediately follow that up by saying you don't know much about that thing. The thing is, now you're on this strawman argument, trying to make the others look bad by saying they're hating on climbers' aspirations. This is NOT what they did.
|
|
|
|
|
jmeizis
Nov 22, 2010, 6:30 PM
Post #56 of 79
(8068 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2006
Posts: 635
|
spikeddem wrote: Drama queen. I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. Most of my responding simply has to do with the fact that I'm bored on the computer already. The weather sucks today and I'm tired from climbing the past two so this is just entertainment. Like I said before, with climbing you have to put up or shut up, which can't take place on the internet. You are right though, I don't have a clue about how hard the B/Y is. With no personal knowledge of the route all one has to go on is videos, pictures, and written info. None of which make it look or sound like a super-mega-death route. If people want to chip in to buy me a plane ticket so I can go view the route in person and realize, holy shit that's way harder and sketchier then it looked from pictures I'd totally take them up on it. But given what I've read about the route having a V4 crux and sustained 11a and 10d climbing with 30-40 foot runouts on vertical and slightly overhanging rock. It doesn't sound that far out of my league. Obviously there's a differnce between how a route sounds and how it actually is. With grade differences in different areas, different types of climbing, different strengths and weaknesses, and all the other variables that make up the difficulty of a route and the ability of individual climbers it's pretty difficult to say whether or not any climber can do anything over the internet, it's just conjecture and babbling. Especially without watching them climb or doing some of the climbs they've done. If a climbing partner who'd climbed it told me it was way out of my league I would take that advice to heart. When some random person on the internet says I'm so arrogant for thinking I'm anywhere near that ability it sounds a hair elitist. Something more interesting came along, going ice climbing.
|
|
|
|
|
redlude97
Nov 22, 2010, 6:33 PM
Post #57 of 79
(8061 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2008
Posts: 990
|
jmeizis wrote: spikeddem wrote: Drama queen. I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. Most of my responding simply has to do with the fact that I'm bored on the computer already. The weather sucks today and I'm tired from climbing the past two so this is just entertainment. Like I said before, with climbing you have to put up or shut up, which can't take place on the internet. You are right though, I don't have a clue about how hard the B/Y is. With no personal knowledge of the route all one has to go on is videos, pictures, and written info. None of which make it look or sound like a super-mega-death route. If people want to chip in to buy me a plane ticket so I can go view the route in person and realize, holy shit that's way harder and sketchier then it looked from pictures I'd totally take them up on it. But given what I've read about the route having a V4 crux and sustained 11a and 10d climbing with 30-40 foot runouts on vertical and slightly overhanging rock. It doesn't sound that far out of my league. Obviously there's a differnce between how a route sounds and how it actually is. With grade differences in different areas, different types of climbing, different strengths and weaknesses, and all the other variables that make up the difficulty of a route and the ability of individual climbers it's pretty difficult to say whether or not any climber can do anything over the internet, it's just conjecture and babbling. Especially without watching them climb or doing some of the climbs they've done. If a climbing partner who'd climbed it told me it was way out of my league I would take that advice to heart. When some random person on the internet says I'm so arrogant for thinking I'm anywhere near that ability it sounds a hair elitist. Something more interesting came along, going ice climbing. Those that have to state 5 times in a thread that they don't care what others think yet continue to bring that point up are the ones who are most butthurt. Fact.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Nov 22, 2010, 6:36 PM
Post #59 of 79
(8055 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
jmeizis - You mentioned feeling comfortable on scary non-runout crack climbs. Could you mention the name of some of these?
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 22, 2010, 6:51 PM
Post #60 of 79
(8039 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Slim chance I could, likely I can't. The back pedaling is certainly entertaining. It's gone from "on the cusp" to this. When I get a moment I'm going to run your posts through the word count program I've got on my computer. I'm curious about how much effort you've expended defending yourself instead of just having admitted that you were wrong in the first place about your ability to climb the B–Y. BTW, you keep quoting Bachar's rating of the route, as if he weren't the notorious sandbagger he was. In an up-thread link, Steve Schneider, the second ascentionist, rated the second pitch, which Bachar called 5.10d, 5.11+, and the first pitch, which Bachar called 5.11a, 5.12. He also called the route finding, which really ought to be figured into the rating, 5.13. And, let's remember that Wolfgang Gullich, the strongest climber of the era, and the guy who established the 5.14 rating, fell on this route. This is the company you are putting yourself in by claiming that you are even remotely qualified to lead this route. And as to your claim that you might be able to do it because training methods have improved, let's remember who invented the campus board: Wolfgang Gullich. Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Nov 22, 2010, 7:05 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 22, 2010, 7:12 PM
Post #62 of 79
(8015 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: Once again, there's a difference between a belief and reality. That difference is called "delusion." Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 23, 2010, 1:44 AM
Post #63 of 79
(7939 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jmeizis wrote: I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. So far, your unconcern in this thread totals 3,109 words. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
curt
Nov 23, 2010, 3:36 AM
Post #64 of 79
(7901 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275
|
jmeizis wrote: ...Apparently the line between self confidence and ego/hubris is a thin one. No, not really in this case. Curt
|
|
|
|
|
blueeyedclimber
Nov 23, 2010, 4:18 AM
Post #65 of 79
(7884 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602
|
I thought the video was good. Inspirational. So inspirational, that if the route was G rated, I would have bought a plane ticket right then to go try it. But, if it was G rated, it would not be the route it is. It safe to say that I will not be trying it. Ever. Josh
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Nov 23, 2010, 8:27 AM
Post #66 of 79
(7842 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
jmeizis wrote: spikeddem wrote: Drama queen. You are right though, I don't have a clue about how hard the B/Y is. With no personal knowledge of the route all one has to go on is videos, pictures, and written info. None of which make it look or sound like a super-mega-death route. If people want to chip in to buy me a plane ticket so I can go view the route in person and realize, holy shit that's way harder and sketchier then it looked from pictures I'd totally take them up on it. I have on occasions been bored at my computer too and took some time to click on the link to your blog. Based on your post, the way you speak about climbing, and the few photos of you on the blog, I am certain you are not on the "Cuspt" of leading BY.
In reply to: But given what I've read about the route having a V4 crux and sustained 11a and 10d climbing with 30-40 foot runouts on vertical and slightly overhanging rock. It doesn't sound that far out of my league. If I honestly taught you could get up the line, I would offer to buy you a plane ticket and have you guide me up it. In all honesty, having seen the route, I doubt you'll reach the first bolt, much less the first belay. Having seen the route, I don't plan on trying it anytime soon and I consistently on-sight 5.11. (Gear and sport, even first ascents)
In reply to: Obviously there's a differnce between how a route sounds and how it actually is. With grade differences in different areas, different types of climbing, different strengths and weaknesses, and all the other variables that make up the difficulty of a route and the ability of individual climbers it's pretty difficult to say whether or not any climber can do anything over the internet, it's just conjecture and babbling. Especially without watching them climb or doing some of the climbs they've done. THE BY is a pretty famous routes, I would say that the people who live in America and are capable of climbing have heard of it prior to this video.
In reply to: If a climbing partner who'd climbed it told me it was way out of my league I would take that advice to heart. When some random person on the internet says I'm so arrogant for thinking I'm anywhere near that ability it sounds a hair elitist. I lived and climbed in Yosemite for 18 months and only met a couple of climbers who actually had been on the route. Let put the line into perspective for you. I plan on working and training toward a free ascent of Lurking Fear, I don't plan on climbing the BY. While a free ascent of Lurking Fear has a more difficult grade, I think it's more attainable for me than climbing the B.Y. With that said, O agree with a post above, go for it, make sure you bring a cameraman, we'd like to see the footage. I am sure he and I both mean this in the same way. I really want to see the footage, almost enough to pay for the plan ticket.
|
|
|
|
|
billcoe_
Nov 23, 2010, 8:42 PM
Post #67 of 79
(7754 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694
|
This thread went downhill fast. Translation: JT512: Jmeize, your penis is small. jmeizis: is not. JT512: your penis is not just small, but wayyyy too small. Jmeize: Screw U, it is not. JT512: dude, I've all but seen it based on your continued descriptions here. Infinitesimally small is the correct description. Jmeize: I could make it big if I wanted too. JT: Not even close my friend. You're having delusions. Jmeize: Hey, I'm sure I could make it get bigger, I think, anyway, it's already like ....HUGE, all the time. JT: No, it isn't. Jmeize: OK, FINE! I'm gonna look at it right now. ? Jmeize: (Looking) Oh..........uhhh... Hey, screw U JT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Nov 24, 2010, 12:26 AM
Post #69 of 79
(7683 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
Nice.. so a .14 climber is giving it a huge amount of respect... something well below warm up level.. But I'm sure jeremiah would be fine...... oh wait.. not he wouldn't HAHAHA
|
|
|
|
|
TheRucat
Nov 25, 2010, 3:46 AM
Post #70 of 79
(7605 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2008
Posts: 234
|
jmeizis wrote: I'm not lumping myself in with anyone. In fact I avoid lumping myself in with anyone because every climb is different as is every climber. I never said I was going to go redpoint the B/Y or try to. Maybe read the thread more carefully. Slim chance I could, likely I can't. I'm not going to say "no effing way" without looking at it. I'm not going to tersely discourage someone else from thinking about it even if I know for a fact that I'm loads stronger than them and I'm not thinking of doing it. I definately would not do so if I had never seen them climb or been on the climb they were referring to. Hey man forget these pussies, I'll come rope up with you. We got this shit.
|
|
|
|
|
jcrew
Nov 25, 2010, 4:08 AM
Post #71 of 79
(7592 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673
|
TheRucat wrote: Hey man forget these pussies, I'll come rope up with you. We got this shit. we're talking tuolemene meadows, not Jersey Shore.
|
|
|
|
|
TheRucat
Nov 25, 2010, 4:20 AM
Post #72 of 79
(7587 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2008
Posts: 234
|
jcrew wrote: TheRucat wrote: Hey man forget these pussies, I'll come rope up with you. We got this shit. we're talking tuolemene meadows, not Jersey Shore. You disrespecting my family? Come at me bro.
|
|
|
|
|
spikeddem
Nov 25, 2010, 5:25 AM
Post #73 of 79
(7563 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2007
Posts: 6319
|
TheRucat wrote: jcrew wrote: TheRucat wrote: Hey man forget these pussies, I'll come rope up with you. We got this shit. we're talking tuolemene meadows, not Jersey Shore. You disrespecting my family? Come at me bro. Must be a Jersey thing.
|
|
|
|
|
jcrew
Nov 25, 2010, 7:03 AM
Post #74 of 79
(7543 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 11, 2006
Posts: 673
|
spikeddem wrote: TheRucat wrote: jcrew wrote: TheRucat wrote: Hey man forget these pussies, I'll come rope up with you. We got this shit. we're talking tuolemene meadows, not Jersey Shore. You disrespecting my family? Come at me bro. Must be a Jersey thing. new reality show idea: Gumbies in the Meadows plot line: take a big whip and bust your melon, "hey, it's a jersey thing"
|
|
|
|
|
carabiner96
Nov 25, 2010, 1:52 PM
Post #75 of 79
(7434 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 10, 2006
Posts: 12610
|
jt512 wrote: jmeizis wrote: I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. So far, your unconcern in this thread totals 3,109 words. Jay Nerd
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 26, 2010, 2:20 AM
Post #76 of 79
(2126 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
carabiner96 wrote: jt512 wrote: jmeizis wrote: I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. So far, your unconcern in this thread totals 3,109 words. Jay Nerd It probably won't help my case to disclose that I used a Linux word count utility to come up with that. Jay
(This post was edited by jt512 on Nov 26, 2010, 2:21 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Nov 26, 2010, 2:37 AM
Post #77 of 79
(2118 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
jt512 wrote: carabiner96 wrote: jt512 wrote: jmeizis wrote: I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. So far, your unconcern in this thread totals 3,109 words. Jay Nerd It probably won't help my case to disclose that I used a Linux word count utility to come up with that. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
jt512
Nov 26, 2010, 2:41 AM
Post #78 of 79
(2117 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
jakedatc wrote: jt512 wrote: carabiner96 wrote: jt512 wrote: jmeizis wrote: I think I might have somehow given the impression that the things on this website affect me. So far, your unconcern in this thread totals 3,109 words. Jay Nerd It probably won't help my case to disclose that I used a Linux word count utility to come up with that. Jay As I said, it wouldn't help my case. Jay
|
|
|
|
|
tradrenn
Dec 4, 2010, 8:53 AM
Post #79 of 79
(2009 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
jmeizis wrote: It's too bad your mother didn't smother you when you were a child, then the rest of us wouldn't have to deal with your personality. Hilarious. V.
|
|
|
|
|
|