Forums: Climbing Information: Injury Treatment and Prevention:
Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on...
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Injury Treatment and Prevention

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All


renobdarb


May 24, 2003, 5:01 AM
Post #101 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2003
Posts: 393

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I have a small cut on the top of my head from where I rolled back and bumped it on a Nalgene bottle on the ground. It bleed pretty good, but all things considered I am extremely lucky.

So that I don't have to read through 7 pages of crap to see, I will assume that no one has yet said the following:

WHY THE FVCK WEREN'T YOU WEARING YOUR HELMET?!?!?

Dude, you were climbing rocks. Okay, an ex-friend said he only wears it when aid climbing or where rocks can fall and hit him in the head. He can fall without hitting his head on the rocks he says.

Okay people, try this. Go up to some bricks, or a smooth tree trunk and just kind of bump your head into it quickly. It fvcking hurts huh? Now imagine only hitting it from 3 feet above the ground. Can you imagine the sheer pain that would cause. You could easily crack your <1cm thick skull from only 3 FEET! Imagine a 30 footer (not that rare of a fall when climbing if your last piece is only 10 feet below your feet) and hitting your head on the rocks.

Dude, you would fvcking die or be a vegetable.

Screw the gri-gri. They are great pieces of equipment that can make some types of climbing (aid) way faster and safer (cleaner hauls and belays hands free). Sure it sucks that you got dropped, but as said before, it works just like an ATC when turned the wrong way. The problem was your belayer's inattention too.

So before you go blaming your belay device, take a look at your own self. You see no helmet on your head. Well then dammit, put one on and go try not to die from a head wound please.

I'm glad to hear you are alright, just think before you climb.

TRADitionally yours,

Cali Dirtbag

dude, do you sell helmets? just kidding...


merewyn


May 30, 2003, 3:50 AM
Post #102 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 12

Grigris [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'd sure like to say that you are wrong about that, but like everything in climbing it is a matter for individual perception.

I hate grigris and would never consider leading on one. Having worked in a climbing gym for four years and wishing every day that we could switch to ATCs. With another gym just down the road, we felt stuck with the system until they would consider changing too. At our gym we always took careful attention to teach good belaying, and I never told a customer that it locks so they would not rely on it.

The gri gri has it's place - route setting is an example of this, and I have used them in a theatre setting where the actors were 'flying' using a human counter weight system. In those cases though I alway tie it off rather than rely on a locking mechanism. A simple over hand knot furthur down the rope might just save you your bacon.

Why the discussion of your belayers size? Those of us who are a bit smaller just need to take that into account along with the amount of slack in the system.


john_doe


May 30, 2003, 4:07 AM
Post #103 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 3, 2003
Posts: 31

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I too have a grigri horror story. I will place this disclaimer first - It was not the fault of the grigri, but human error.

About 6 months back, while TRing at our home wall, my climbing partner whom I have been climbing with for years almost dropped me. He had just purchased his new "toy," and was eager to try it out on me (his somewhat unwilling subject, as I had read horror stories about the device's ability to increase human error).

Going up was fine, I climbed 1/2 way up the wall and took a test fall to see how the device worked. It caught exactly as it should have, and I proceeded to the top. Once at the top, I gave my normal "thumbs up" and he gave me his "thumbs up" in return, and I leaned over the edge and placed my body weight on the rope. The next thing that I know, I am 3/4ths of the way down the wall, and I only got F!@# out of my mouth.

Once I was down at the bottom I asked him what the hell happened, and he said that he just released the lever and kept the other hand on the rope to "guide it". Well anyways, I chewed his a$$ out royally for his thoughts of how "foolproof" the grigri actually is. And from now one, no one is allowed to belay me on a grigri, for that very reason. People assume it is bomber, and that it will do all the work - which is very much not the case. :evil: :roll: :x :evil:


jt512


May 30, 2003, 4:17 AM
Post #104 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I too have a grigri horror story. I will place this disclaimer first - It was not the fault of the grigri, but human error.

...

Going up was fine, I climbed 1/2 way up the wall and took a test fall to see how the device worked. It caught exactly as it should have, and I proceeded to the top. Once at the top, I gave my normal "thumbs up" and he gave me his "thumbs up" in return, and I leaned over the edge and placed my body weight on the rope. The next thing that I know, I am 3/4ths of the way down the wall, and I only got F!@# out of my mouth.

Once I was down at the bottom I asked him what the hell happened, and he said that he just released the lever and kept the other hand on the rope to "guide it". ... And from now one, no one is allowed to belay me on a grigri, for that very reason. People assume it is bomber, and that it will do all the work - which is very much not the case. :evil: :roll: :x :evil:

You were doing ok there, saying it was human error and not the fault of the grigri, but you drew the wrong conclusion at the end. Your partner simply wasn't using the device correctly. Properly trained belayers don't make the mistake your friend did. It is not a question of assuming the device will do all the work or not. It is simply a question using the device correctly. The instructions say perfectly clearly how to lower someone. If your friend had followed the instructions, there would have been no problem.

-Jay


lambone


May 30, 2003, 5:03 AM
Post #105 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 1, 2003
Posts: 1399

gri-gris rule [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

gri-gris don't kill people, people kill people.

seriously, gri-gri's kick ass, I have been soloing with one for years and nothing beats it, it it ain't workin it's cause you fucked up, period


lunchbox


Jun 1, 2003, 2:31 PM
Post #106 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 9, 2003
Posts: 20

Re: Falling without a catch-- atc's from now on [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm in the Gri-Gri camp after an accident in Atlantis. My lead climber was clipping on the fifth bolt of giggling marlin 5.9 when he told me he was peeling off. He was 10' above the last bolt and when he hit the protection and my anchor jerked my hand came off the brake. I instinctively grabbed with my left hand which had no chance in hell of stopping the fall. My right hand went to the ATC I grabbed the entire device and was able to force the rope moving and great speed to an angle that provides the friction I needed to stop the fall. My partner never knew how close he came to decking until he saw my hands which were rope burned.

I've had lots of well meaning and appreciated advice since about anchor placements and belay technique. A rope in an ATC device goes from static to 100feet/sec in a fraction of a second. The fact is a Gri-Gri is an aid and can save a life it can react in an instant even if the belayer is disabled. The Gri-Gri I own is for ropes between 10mm and 11mm. Place your pro with the fact that an impact will shock your placement harder to some degree and always keep your hand on the brake.


xippi


Jun 23, 2003, 11:27 PM
Post #107 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2003
Posts: 15

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I have climbed for 5 years on and off and never hit the ground


Am I doing something wrong :?:


jt512


Jun 24, 2003, 1:00 AM
Post #108 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a catch-- atc's from now on [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I'm in the Gri-Gri camp after an accident in Atlantis. My lead climber was clipping on the fifth bolt of giggling marlin 5.9 when he told me he was peeling off. He was 10' above the last bolt and when he hit the protection and my anchor jerked my hand came off the brake. I instinctively grabbed with my left hand which had no chance in hell of stopping the fall. My right hand went to the ATC I grabbed the entire device and was able to force the rope moving and great speed to an angle that provides the friction I needed to stop the fall. My partner never knew how close he came to decking until he saw my hands which were rope burned.

If you "instinctively" grab the wrong side of the rope using a Grigri, you will still drop your partner. Learn to belay properly, and you can use any belay device. A grigri is not a substitute for competent belaying.

-Jay


chitlinsconcarne


Jun 24, 2003, 4:38 AM
Post #109 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 199

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Never been dropped , never dropped anybody. All of the modern devices work brilliantly when in the hands of a competant user. Both auto and nonauto devices have their place, practice using both and you'll be ahead of the game. They can all feed smoothly, its just a matter of practice.
Heres a thing that the leader can do to help..learn how to clip. Seasoned climbers learn that pulling huge amounts of rope to clip at panic speed is a gumby move. It will get you short roped on anything from a munter to a grigri and and all points in between. Nothing like watching a paniced leader reach to his ankles and try to speed-yard the cord to a tip-toe height clip and getting that oh-so-popular jerk-jerkity-jerk-oh-god-why-can't-i-get-some-slack expression.

Save yourself the hassles. Let your belayer know its coming, then clip deliberately. If you're clipping way above your head, theres a good chance that you're not in the right spot. Practice good communication and technique and all the differences in the devices don't seem so major..just different strong suits for different uses.


jt512


Jun 24, 2003, 3:47 PM
Post #110 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Seasoned climbers learn that pulling huge amounts of rope to clip at panic speed is a gumby move.

I completely disagree. Pulling up rope fast saves energy. The faster you can clip, the less time and energy you spend hanging onto the clipping hold. Also, faster is safer, especially on the first or second clip, where you are in danger of grounding if you fall.

In reply to:
It will get you short roped on anything from a munter to a grigri and and all points in between.

Not if your belayer knows what he/she is doing.

In reply to:
Nothing like watching a paniced leader reach to his ankles and try to speed-yard the cord to a tip-toe height clip and getting that oh-so-popular jerk-jerkity-jerk-oh-god-why-can't-i-get-some-slack expression.

You're making excuses for poor belaying. It's the leader's butt on the line, so he gets to clip any way he wants to. The belayer's job is to facilitate the leader, not the other way around.

In reply to:
Let your belayer know its coming...

If you are placing gear (or draws) and your belayer can see you, you should not have to warn your belayer that you are about to clip. If the draws are preplaced, then it is often useful to alert your belayer before you clip, as he/she may have no other way of knowing that you are about to clip.

In reply to:
...then clip deliberately.

I have no idea what you mean by clipping "deliberately." If you mean slowing down your clip to accommodate your belayer, then you are wrong. Clipping any more slowly than necessary just wastes energy.

In reply to:
If you're clipping way above your head, theres a good chance that you're not in the right spot.

And there is a good chance you are in the "right" spot. It depends.

-Jay


czarcastic


Jun 24, 2003, 4:02 PM
Post #111 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 16, 2003
Posts: 64

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Personally I first learned belaying using an ATC and then moved to the grigri years later. I use an ATC for trad and the grigri for top ropes, sport climbs, and teaching friends and I see no problem with it, as long as you know how to competently belay. I have even threaded it backwards, but that was no problem (Not recommended of course) since it still acts the same was as an ATC. I can't see how the grigri would fail if it wasn't something the belayer did to cause it. Any accidents or close calls I have seen whie working at the local gym and outdoors was purely caused by improper belaying.

As others have pointed out, it may give some a false sense of security, but as long as your using it as petzl recommends, then I can't see a problem.


sspssp


Jun 24, 2003, 4:03 PM
Post #112 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 2, 2003
Posts: 1731

gri-gri [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
.
It sure must be hard to feed that gri gri out when you have a break hand on the rope and trying to pull and push it through, did you get a jerky belay where she had to hold the cam open and fuss with the rope?

No, its not. Althought it does take practice. There are a couple of ways to do this. One is to hold the gri-gri like a normal belay plate (pinch thumb and index finger together like you are making an "ok" sign) run the brake rope through the circle made by thumb and index finger. The

pinky can hold down the lever in order to feed the rope (pull rope with left hand). If the leader falls the right hand naturally slides off the gri-gri and clenches the brake line. This takes a little bit of strength in the pinky and might be hard for someone with a small hand. There is also a way to cradle the brake rope in the palm while using the thumb to hold the lever (all this is with the right hand) and feed rope with the left. It is easy to show but hard to explain.

The gri-gri was designed for fatter ropes than people typically use today (they should come out with one for smaller ropes). A new, slick, 10mm rope will NOT always lock up a gri-gri. Learn how to feed rope smoothly and keep a hand on the brake line when using the gri-gri. Or get a different device.

peace



chitlinsconcarne


Jun 24, 2003, 6:20 PM
Post #113 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 199

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Seasoned climbers learn that pulling huge amounts of rope to clip at panic speed is a gumby move.

I completely disagree. Pulling up rope fast saves energy. The faster you can clip, the less time and energy you spend hanging onto the clipping hold. Also, faster is safer, especially on the first or second clip, where you are in danger of grounding if you fall.

-No, its a gumby move. The difference between a sport loop and getting short roped can be just a matter of a couple feet, most especially on the second clip. That second bolt can quite frequently be one of the most hazardous places on a climb. Don't panic grab for gobs of rope..slow down, get it right. The difference between a "fast clip" and a "deliberate one is a matter of a couple seconds. If you pull faster than your belayer can feed or bobble the clip, you've just screwed yourself.-

In reply to:
In reply to:
It will get you short roped on anything from a munter to a grigri and and all points in between.

Not if your belayer knows what he/she is doing.

-The climber and belayer are a team. Work together and improve your own odds of success. I don't know how many times I've watched a clumsy leader try to panic clip, then glare at the belayer when things go wrong. Belayers, next time your neophyte leader pulls that tantrum, assure them that next time they reach to their ankles to grab rope and pull "fast", it won't be a problem because they'll have a sport loop that Yao could jump rope with.-

In reply to:
In reply to:
Nothing like watching a paniced leader reach to his ankles and try to speed-yard the cord to a tip-toe height clip and getting that oh-so-popular jerk-jerkity-jerk-oh-god-why-can't-i-get-some-slack expression.

You're making excuses for poor belaying. It's the leader's butt on the line, so he gets to clip any way he wants to. The belayer's job is to facilitate the leader, not the other way around.

-No, the leader doesn't get to clip anyway he wants. Poor clipping technique is bad teamwork and bad teamwork is poor technique..on a big wall or a sport climb.-

In reply to:
In reply to:
Let your belayer know its coming...

If you are placing gear (or draws) and your belayer can see you, you should not have to warn your belayer that you are about to clip. If the draws are preplaced, then it is often useful to alert your belayer before you clip, as he/she may have no other way of knowing that you are about to clip.

-Theres no reason not to let them know. Especially on long routes even when still in sight of the belayer. On longer routes, the belayers view gets forshortened, they may not know if your on the clipping hold and in position for the clip. Even on a redpoint run you may make a change and decide to clip from a different spot or body position than before. Get used to using that quick verbal cue..it takes no effort and gives the belayer that extra heads up. Its good teamwork.-

In reply to:
In reply to:
...then clip deliberately.

I have no idea what you mean by clipping "deliberately." If you mean slowing down your clip to accommodate your belayer, then you are wrong. Clipping any more slowly than necessary just wastes energy.

-Slow down the clip to accomodate the team and the position on the route. Frantic clipping forces your belayer to speed feed rope and increases your own chances of bobbling. Both of those can get you in more trouble than taking the extra couple seconds to move with control. Practice it and it becomes obvious.-

In reply to:
In reply to:
If you're clipping way above your head, theres a good chance that you're not in the right spot.

And there is a good chance you are in the "right" spot. It depends.

-Jay

-True, it depends on whether the route was properly bolted up or not. Its a pretty common beginner move to thrutch and panic clip from a low hold, then move up to a jug with the bolt at waist level. On hard routes (doesn't matter so much on easy ones) thats usually no accident. Remember, pulling out tons of slack for a tippytoes clip above the head gets you a longer fall than moving up and clipping at your waist.

The zen of the good clip takes practice, its not always intuitive. Just work on it and it doesn't matter which belay device your using, things will be safer with better technique.

[Edited by jt512 to correct formatting of embedded quotes]


meataxe


Jun 27, 2003, 1:21 AM
Post #114 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 23, 2002
Posts: 1162

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Someone on the next route to me got dropped with a gri gri this past weekend. I didn't see the fall, I just heard the thud.

He was banged up, but walked away from it. I'd guess he was dropped from 10-20 feet and I believe it happened while he was being lowered.

I've started to appreciate the concerns around gri gris now. :-)

When I'm lowering on one, I tend to open it all the way and use my brake hand to control the descent -- sort of like an ATC. It seems like most folks use the lever as a "throttle" when lowering.


jt512


Jun 27, 2003, 2:14 AM
Post #115 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Seasoned climbers learn that pulling huge amounts of rope to clip at panic speed is a gumby move.

I completely disagree. Pulling up rope fast saves energy. The faster you can clip, the less time and energy you spend hanging onto the clipping hold. Also, faster is safer, especially on the first or second clip, where you are in danger of grounding if you fall.

-No, its a gumby move. The difference between a sport loop and getting short roped can be just a matter of a couple feet, most especially on the second clip. That second bolt can quite frequently be one of the most hazardous places on a climb. Don't panic grab for gobs of rope..slow down, get it right. The difference between a "fast clip" and a "deliberate one is a matter of a couple seconds. If you pull faster than your belayer can feed or bobble the clip, you've just screwed yourself.

Well, we are in disagreement as to which is the gumby move. The faster you clip the less time you are in danger, especially at the 2nd bolt, where you can ground. If your belayer can't keep up with your fastest clip, then your belayer is literally not up to speed. There are routes where the best hold from which to clip is so bad that you must clip as fast as possible to avoid falling. And "a couple of seconds" difference between a fast and a deliberate clip? What are you talking about? You must climb trad! If you're not clipping overhead, you should be able to clip in way less than 2 seconds total. And, I can pull up rope really, really fast and not "bobble" a clip. Sounds like you need practice clipping.

In reply to:
I don't know how many times I've watched a clumsy leader try to panic clip...

I don't doubt that. I just wonder how many times you've watched a skilled sport climber clip at lightning speed.

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Nothing like watching a paniced leader reach to his ankles and try to speed-yard the cord to a tip-toe height clip and getting that oh-so-popular jerk-jerkity-jerk-oh-god-why-can't-i-get-some-slack expression.

You're making excuses for poor belaying. It's the leader's butt on the line, so he gets to clip any way he wants to. The belayer's job is to facilitate the leader, not the other way around.

-No, the leader doesn't get to clip anyway he wants.

Yes he does, and I've already explained why: it's his ass on the line. You can repeat that he doesn't all you want, but you still won't be right.

In reply to:
Poor clipping technique is bad teamwork and bad teamwork is poor technique..on a big wall or a sport climb.-

Poor clipping technique includes back clipping and fumbling with the rope. It does not include clipping quickly.

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Let your belayer know its coming...

If you are placing gear (or draws) and your belayer can see you, you should not have to warn your belayer that you are about to clip. If the draws are preplaced, then it is often useful to alert your belayer before you clip, as he/she may have no other way of knowing that you are about to clip.

-Theres no reason not to let them know. Especially on long routes even when still in sight of the belayer. On longer routes, the belayers view gets forshortened, they may not know if your on the clipping hold and in position for the clip.

What do they think you're going to do when they see you grab the draw off your harness, use it to pick your nose?

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
...then clip deliberately.

I have no idea what you mean by clipping "deliberately." If you mean slowing down your clip to accommodate your belayer, then you are wrong. Clipping any more slowly than necessary just wastes energy.

-Slow down the clip to accomodate the team...

That is just so wrong, and it doesn't really do the belayer any good in the longrun either. They'll never learn to keep up with a fast partner.

In reply to:
Frantic clipping forces your belayer to speed feed rope and increases your own chances of bobbling.

You keep using terms like "frantic" clipping and "panic" clipping. If you are competent, then you can clip fast without being frantic or panicky. And a skilled sport climber doesn't "bobble" a clip very often no matter how fast he clips.

In reply to:
Both of those can get you in more trouble than taking the extra couple seconds to move with control. Practice it and it becomes obvious.-

I'm sorry, but when you are clipping from a marginal clipping hold, or when you're so pumped that you can barely maintain the hold, your risk of falling increases with every millisecond you spend clipping. The answer is not to slow down your clip in these situations; it's to speed it up. To succeed on routes like this you need to be able to clip fast and not "bobble" your clip, and you need a belayer who can keep up with you.

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If you're clipping way above your head, theres a good chance that you're not in the right spot.

And there is a good chance you are in the "right" spot. It depends.

-True, it depends on whether the route was properly bolted up or not.

Wrong. It is not necessarily (or even usually) wrong to place the bolt with the intention that it be clipped overhead (see explanation below).

In reply to:
Remember, pulling out tons of slack for a tippytoes clip above the head gets you a longer fall than moving up and clipping at your waist.

No it doesn't. The distance fallen is the same whether the clip is made at the waist or overhead. What is different is the starting point and ending point of the fall. If you clip overhead and fall you start falling from a lower position on the route and hence end up lower at the end of the fall; however, the total distance fallen is the same as if you clipped at your waist. Therefore, if there is nothing to hit on the way down, it is just as safe to clip overhead as it is at your waist (all else equal). The best place to clip from, therefore, is not the higher hold necessarily, but the one that requires the least energy to use.

-Jay


chitlinsconcarne


Jun 27, 2003, 2:52 AM
Post #116 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 199

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Seasoned climbers learn that pulling huge amounts of rope to clip at panic speed is a gumby move.

I completely disagree. Pulling up rope fast saves energy. The faster you can clip, the less time and energy you spend hanging onto the clipping hold. Also, faster is safer, especially on the first or second clip, where you are in danger of grounding if you fall.

-No, its a gumby move. The difference between a sport loop and getting short roped can be just a matter of a couple feet, most especially on the second clip. That second bolt can quite frequently be one of the most hazardous places on a climb. Don't panic grab for gobs of rope..slow down, get it right. The difference between a "fast clip" and a "deliberate one is a matter of a couple seconds. If you pull faster than your belayer can feed or bobble the clip, you've just screwed yourself.

Well, we are in disagreement as to which is the gumby move. The faster you clip the less time you are in danger, especially at the 2nd bolt, where you can ground. If your belayer can't keep up with your fastest clip, then your belayer is literally not up to speed. There are routes where the best hold from which to clip is so bad that you must clip as fast as possible to avoid falling. And "a couple of seconds" difference between a fast and a deliberate clip? What are you talking about? You must climb trad! If you're not clipping overhead, you should be able to clip in way less than 2 seconds total. And, I can pull up rope really, really fast and not "bobble" a clip. Sounds like you need practice clipping.

In reply to:
I don't know how many times I've watched a clumsy leader try to panic clip...

I don't doubt that. I just wonder how many times you've watched a skilled sport climber clip at lightning speed.

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Nothing like watching a paniced leader reach to his ankles and try to speed-yard the cord to a tip-toe height clip and getting that oh-so-popular jerk-jerkity-jerk-oh-god-why-can't-i-get-some-slack expression.

You're making excuses for poor belaying. It's the leader's butt on the line, so he gets to clip any way he wants to. The belayer's job is to facilitate the leader, not the other way around.

-No, the leader doesn't get to clip anyway he wants.

Yes he does, and I've already explained why: it's his ass on the line. You can repeat that he doesn't all you want, but you still won't be right.

In reply to:
Poor clipping technique is bad teamwork and bad teamwork is poor technique..on a big wall or a sport climb.-

Poor clipping technique includes back clipping and fumbling with the rope. It does not include clipping quickly.

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Let your belayer know its coming...

If you are placing gear (or draws) and your belayer can see you, you should not have to warn your belayer that you are about to clip. If the draws are preplaced, then it is often useful to alert your belayer before you clip, as he/she may have no other way of knowing that you are about to clip.

-Theres no reason not to let them know. Especially on long routes even when still in sight of the belayer. On longer routes, the belayers view gets forshortened, they may not know if your on the clipping hold and in position for the clip.

What do they think you're going to do when they see you grab the draw off your harness, use it to pick your nose?

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
...then clip deliberately.

I have no idea what you mean by clipping "deliberately." If you mean slowing down your clip to accommodate your belayer, then you are wrong. Clipping any more slowly than necessary just wastes energy.

-Slow down the clip to accomodate the team...

That is just so wrong, and it doesn't really do the belayer any good in the longrun either. They'll never learn to keep up with a fast partner.

In reply to:
Frantic clipping forces your belayer to speed feed rope and increases your own chances of bobbling.

You keep using terms like "frantic" clipping and "panic" clipping. If you are competent, then you can clip fast without being frantic or panicky. And a skilled sport climber doesn't "bobble" a clip very often no matter how fast he clips.

In reply to:
Both of those can get you in more trouble than taking the extra couple seconds to move with control. Practice it and it becomes obvious.-

I'm sorry, but when you are clipping from a marginal clipping hold, or when you're so pumped that you can barely maintain the hold, your risk of falling increases with every millisecond you spend clipping. The answer is not to slow down your clip in these situations; it's to speed it up. To succeed on routes like this you need to be able to clip fast and not "bobble" your clip, and you need a belayer who can keep up with you.

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
If you're clipping way above your head, theres a good chance that you're not in the right spot.

And there is a good chance you are in the "right" spot. It depends.

-True, it depends on whether the route was properly bolted up or not.

Wrong. It is not necessarily (or even usually) wrong to place the bolt with the intention that it be clipped overhead (see explanation below).

In reply to:
Remember, pulling out tons of slack for a tippytoes clip above the head gets you a longer fall than moving up and clipping at your waist.

No it doesn't. The distance fallen is the same whether the clip is made at the waist or overhead. What is different is the starting point and ending point of the fall. If you clip overhead and fall you start falling from a lower position on the route and hence end up lower at the end of the fall; however, the total distance fallen is the same as if you clipped at your waist. Therefore, if there is nothing to hit on the way down, it is just as safe to clip overhead as it is at your waist (all else equal). The best place to clip from, therefore, is not the higher hold necessarily, but the one that requires the least energy to use.

-Jay

I can agree to disagree on this stuff. Everybodies got a different style in everything from how they like to clip to how much slack they like. As to picking my nose with my draws, I find that they tend to painfully snag my nose hairs. On the other hand, I project exactly zero routes without already having the draws in place, so if I feel the need to stop and pick en route, I usually just use the implement that god provided for that very purpose.

As to where to clip from, efficiency certainly is the key. My thought wasn't what would happen if you fell after getting the clip. Who cares? It was what happens if you blow the clip reaching high..something far more likely to get you in the injuries and accidents section than just sagging on the rope. Pulling up lots of slack can be really dangerous low on the route. It can equal a ground fall, something that I've seen happen for just that very reason.

Speed Kills! Not really, I'm just yankin. Hey, I'm not the "sloth", but I've climbed with him, makes me look like speedy gonzales....bettin that some of you Utards know who I'm talkin about...


jt512


Jun 27, 2003, 3:18 AM
Post #117 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
As to picking my nose with my draws, I find that they tend to painfully snag my nose hairs.

You must not use keylock biners. Another reason to buy Petzl!

In reply to:
On the other hand, I project exactly zero routes without already having the draws in place...

That might explain why you emphasize telling your belayer when you are going to clip. I usually announce when I'm going to clip when the draws are already up, but when I'm placing them, I rely on the belayer seeing me take the draw off my harness, assuming I'm in view of the belayer.

In reply to:
As to where to clip from, efficiency certainly is the key. My thought wasn't what would happen if you fell after getting the clip. Who cares? It was what happens if you blow the clip reaching high..something far more likely to get you in the injuries and accidents section than just sagging on the rope. Pulling up lots of slack can be really dangerous low on the route. It can equal a ground fall, something that I've seen happen for just that very reason.

I agree, but I would emphasize that clipping overhead is only more dangerous than clipping at your waist when you are going to hit something if you fall (all else equal); ie, the deck or an obstacle. It is widely erroneously believed that clipping high results in a longer fall than clipping at the waist. It doesn't. You fall the same distance, but since you started falling from a lower stance, you end up lower on the route. This is only important on low-angle routes, or near the ground or above an obstacle. Other than in these situations, you should feel equally "safe" clipping anywhere between the waist and arms length overhead. So, if the lower hold is good, go ahead an clip from it.

-Jay


billburning


Jun 27, 2003, 3:42 AM
Post #118 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 28, 2002
Posts: 239

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

That Hippie dude wouldn't have decked if he didn't have such a stupid RC.com moniker. That is all.


majid_sabet


Jul 8, 2003, 8:57 AM
Post #119 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Well ,you should never belay without gloves, rope burns could kill ,I have seen deep cut over 1 inch on the partner's hand from not wearing a glove on El Cap, stopping a fall is an art, heat generated from the fast moving rope directly applies to all devices such as your fingers and every thing else, I have seen Gri Gri fail ( its mechanical device ) but still is a good choice for possible fall situations (big wall etc), may be your GF was thinking about you not the system , I got almost killed by partner not having his mind on the system. If you feel safer use a prusik (7 mm) above the belay , if your hand could not stop the rope from going thru the belay be ready to wrap the rope on your leg fast( its painful and it could cut blood circulation but it may save your partner). Do not forget that your 50 meter dynamic rope could become a 65 meter during a major fall, I remember about a case where leader fell and partner could not stop the fall and burned both hand ,while leader still falling near his death some knot ended up in the middle of the running rope and got jammed in the belay and stop the guy after he went thru 30 meter fall . :)


mreardon


Jul 8, 2003, 5:02 PM
Post #120 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 17, 2002
Posts: 1337

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Seasoned climbers learn that pulling huge amounts of rope to clip at panic speed is a gumby move.

Note to self, never let chitlin belay me, he's obviously way too "seasoned" to see his mistake and be willing to learn.


robmcc


Jul 8, 2003, 5:39 PM
Post #121 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 1, 2003
Posts: 2176

Re: Falling without a catch-- atc's from now on [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
A rope in an ATC device goes from static to 100feet/sec in a fraction of a second.

Request for clarification from the more experienced of you out there. My first impulse is to say "Only if you're doing something badly wrong!", but the truth is, I've never caught a lead fall. Taken 'em, yes. Caught 'em, no. My then partner told me it was a much stronger pull than a TR fall, but there was certainly no rope zipping through the ATC, much less at 70mph.

Am I right in thinking that some slippage will occur, and that's fine, but rope running at any speed means you're doing something wrong?


jt512


Jul 8, 2003, 5:52 PM
Post #122 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a catch-- atc's from now on [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
A rope in an ATC device goes from static to 100feet/sec in a fraction of a second.

Request for clarification from the more experienced of you out there. My first impulse is to say "Only if you're doing something badly wrong!", but the truth is, I've never caught a lead fall. Taken 'em, yes. Caught 'em, no. My then partner told me it was a much stronger pull than a TR fall, but there was certainly no rope zipping through the ATC, much less at 70mph.

Am I right in thinking that some slippage will occur, and that's fine, but rope running at any speed means you're doing something wrong?

It depends. Most lead falls are not severe enough to cause rope to run through a locked off ATC. With experience, however, you can learn to intentionally let some rope slip through the ATC to give the leader a softer catch.

-Jay


murf


Jul 8, 2003, 5:53 PM
Post #123 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 15, 2002
Posts: 1150

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
It is widely erroneously believed that clipping high results in a longer fall than clipping at the waist. It doesn't. You fall the same distance, but since you started falling from a lower stance, you end up lower on the route. This is only important on low-angle routes, or near the ground or above an obstacle. Other than in these situations, you should feel equally "safe" clipping anywhere between the waist and arms length overhead. So, if the lower hold is good, go ahead an clip from it.

-Jay
Hmmmm... Always figured the fact that the rope goes up to the high clip, then back down to the tie in was the reason the fall was longer. Examples below, lets say 10' between bolts and the distance from my waist to head is 2' and distance from waist to hand is 4'. I'm ignoring rope strech on the fall length.

Clip at waist:

negligible extra rope to pull, fall 20 feet.

Clip at head ( waist to head 2' ):

pull rope, botch clip, fall 10' from bolt to bolt, plus 2' back down to harness, 12' rope out, fall

10' back to bolt + 12' for the rope that's out = 22'

Clip at arms full extension ( 4' from waist to arm extension ):

pull rope botch clip, fall... 10' from bolt to bolt, plus 4' back down to harness, 14' of rope out,

10' back to bolt + 14' for the rope that's out = 24'

Botching a low clip seems to make for a longer fall to me, where did I go wrong?

Murf


jt512


Jul 8, 2003, 6:26 PM
Post #124 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
It is widely erroneously believed that clipping high results in a longer fall than clipping at the waist. It doesn't. You fall the same distance, but since you started falling from a lower stance, you end up lower on the route. This is only important on low-angle routes, or near the ground or above an obstacle. Other than in these situations, you should feel equally "safe" clipping anywhere between the waist and arms length overhead. So, if the lower hold is good, go ahead an clip from it.

-Jay
Hmmmm... Always figured the fact that the rope goes up to the high clip, then back down to the tie in was the reason the fall was longer. Examples below, lets say 10' between bolts and the distance from my waist to head is 2' and distance from waist to hand is 4'. I'm ignoring rope strech on the fall length.

Clip at waist:

negligible extra rope to pull, fall 20 feet.

Clip at head ( waist to head 2' ):

pull rope, botch clip, fall 10' from bolt to bolt, plus 2' back down to harness, 12' rope out, fall

10' back to bolt + 12' for the rope that's out = 22'

...where did I go wrong?

It's not 10' back to the bolt. It's 8'. The relevant distance is the distance between the tie-in point (your waist) and the lower bolt. You fall 8 + 12 = 20 feet, the same distance as if you climbed higher and clipped at your waist. You do, however, land 2' lower, since you fell from 2' lower on the route, which is obviously relevant close to the ground.

-Jay


deadfish


Jul 8, 2003, 6:31 PM
Post #125 of 198 (19520 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 4, 2003
Posts: 57

Re: Falling without a Catch -- ATC's from now on... [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Clip at head ( waist to head 2' ):

pull rope, botch clip, fall 10' from bolt to bolt, plus 2' back down to harness, 12' rope out, fall

10' back to bolt + 12' for the rope that's out = 22'

Nope. Fall 8' from bolt to bolt (you are 2' below the bolt, that's why you are clipping at your head), 12' of slack out (the 8' to the bolt plus the 4' of rope that you yarded in.

That's 20' total.


In reply to:
Clip at arms full extension ( 4' from waist to arm extension ):

pull rope botch clip, fall... 10' from bolt to bolt, plus 4' back down to harness, 14' of rope out,

10' back to bolt + 14' for the rope that's out = 24'

Nope, now you are only 6' above the last bolt, so you fall 6' plus the 14' of rope that you yarded in...again, a 20' fall. Note that you fall 14' below the first bolt in this case, versus 10' below the first bolt in the case where you clip at your waist. As JT said, fall distance is always the same, you just may end up closer to the ground (something to think about when you are just off the deck, not to worry if you are higher up.

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Injury Treatment and Prevention

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook