|
ddt
Oct 5, 2009, 1:58 PM
Post #1 of 72
(13355 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 21, 2005
Posts: 2304
|
Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit. DDT
(This post was edited by ddt on Oct 5, 2009, 2:16 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
imnotclever
Oct 5, 2009, 2:18 PM
Post #2 of 72
(13335 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 8, 2003
Posts: 10000
|
IT's all WMD's fault! He couldn't get the loungers to leave for the new spot!!! And of course, CI is to blame too.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:22 PM
Post #3 of 72
(13326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit. DDT No beef with the change. You gotta do what you gotta do but I have one request. Please transfer the last 200 or so posts from the old thread to the new thread so that conversations (some of which have been going on for days) can continue with out insane copy and paste work.
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Oct 5, 2009, 2:24 PM
Post #4 of 72
(13316 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
That new pop-up ad has got to be a problem with slow performance too, surely!?
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:31 PM
Post #5 of 72
(13309 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
notapplicable wrote: ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit. DDT No beef with the change. You gotta do what you gotta do but I have one request. Please transfer the last 200 or so posts from the old thread to the new thread so that conversations (some of which have been going on for days) can continue with out insane copy and paste work. Better yet. We will create our own thread (one without the nazi stamp on the cover) and you can transfer the posts. Is that possible?
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:32 PM
Post #6 of 72
(13307 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Or perhaps we'll take this thread. It is nice and roomy in here.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:33 PM
Post #7 of 72
(13302 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
I wonder if SWA?
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:33 PM
Post #8 of 72
(13300 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
i think he would
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:34 PM
Post #9 of 72
(13297 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Oh and the graphics from the righthand ad bar are still loading all over thread.
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Oct 5, 2009, 2:34 PM
Post #10 of 72
(13293 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
Its a good idea, and I'm waiting for the go from the man to do it. It's a reasonable request.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:34 PM
Post #11 of 72
(13292 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
notapplicable wrote: Oh and the graphics from the righthand ad bar are still loading all over thread. I think the frequency might actually be increasing.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:36 PM
Post #12 of 72
(13287 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
epoch wrote: Its a good idea, and I'm waiting for the go from the man to do it. It's a reasonable request. I think so.
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Oct 5, 2009, 2:37 PM
Post #13 of 72
(13283 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
It may work like the Google ads and appear more often when words such as Subaru Detergent Clean Ad Annoying Subaru Clean Detergent etc... are used on a page? Did I help it?
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:37 PM
Post #14 of 72
(13282 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
notapplicable wrote: epoch wrote: Its a good idea, and I'm waiting for the go from the man to do it. It's a reasonable request. I think so. But I'm also starting to feel the love for this place.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:37 PM
Post #15 of 72
(13277 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
notapplicable wrote: notapplicable wrote: epoch wrote: Its a good idea, and I'm waiting for the go from the man to do it. It's a reasonable request. I think so. But I'm also starting to feel the love for this place. Will have to talk to the committee and see what they think.
|
|
|
|
|
kachoong
Oct 5, 2009, 2:38 PM
Post #16 of 72
(13275 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: 15304
|
notapplicable wrote: notapplicable wrote: Oh and the graphics from the righthand ad bar are still loading all over thread. I think the frequency might actually be increasing. Yeah, I've been getting two on a page at the same time! Crikey!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 2:40 PM
Post #17 of 72
(13273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
epoch wrote: It may work like the Google ads and appear more often when words such as Subaru Detergent Clean Ad Annoying Subaru Clean Detergent etc... are used on a page? Did I help it? No, I actually haven't seen that one yet. For some reason the pics and text from the "sale" items over there>>> keep loading about 3 inches to the left and land just over top of the "checkspelling" and "post reply" button.
|
|
|
|
|
prick
Oct 5, 2009, 2:49 PM
Post #18 of 72
(13264 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 16, 2009
Posts: 45
|
Sometimes a stray, long thread will be dangling from a shirt sleeve and thus distract me from whatever it is I'm doing. I can see how it could cause performance issues with some people.
|
|
|
|
|
clausti
Oct 5, 2009, 2:59 PM
Post #19 of 72
(13251 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 5, 2004
Posts: 5690
|
epoch wrote: It may work like the Google ads and appear more often when words such as Subaru Detergent Clean Ad Annoying Subaru Clean Detergent etc... are used on a page? Did I help it? it's been double splooging all over mytopics page all morning with no subaru references. i don't think it's that picky.
|
|
|
|
|
epoch
Moderator
Oct 5, 2009, 3:02 PM
Post #20 of 72
(13250 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 32163
|
clausti wrote: epoch wrote: It may work like the Google ads and appear more often when words such as Subaru Detergent Clean Ad Annoying Subaru Clean Detergent etc... are used on a page? Did I help it? it's been double splooging all over mytopics page all morning with no subaru references. i don't think it's that picky. Damn...
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 5, 2009, 3:39 PM
Post #21 of 72
(13224 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
Looks like there's nothing to do now but go back to causing trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 5, 2009, 3:40 PM
Post #22 of 72
(13224 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
epoch wrote: Its a good idea, and I'm waiting for the go from the man to do it. It's a reasonable request. Hey look, mini-DDT is talking.
|
|
|
|
|
wanderlustmd
Oct 5, 2009, 4:55 PM
Post #23 of 72
(13205 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2006
Posts: 8150
|
I tried.
|
|
|
|
|
kriso9tails
Oct 5, 2009, 7:37 PM
Post #24 of 72
(13185 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772
|
notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something.
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Oct 5, 2009, 8:51 PM
Post #25 of 72
(13165 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Looks like there's nothing to do now but go back to causing trouble. yep, just going to have to figure owt what to penerate.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 5, 2009, 9:42 PM
Post #26 of 72
(3816 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 10:57 PM
Post #27 of 72
(3805 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no. Hey, the contrarian is back. Hows life treating you these days?
|
|
|
|
|
the_climber
Oct 5, 2009, 11:06 PM
Post #28 of 72
(3797 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142
|
Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 11:26 PM
Post #29 of 72
(3791 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family?
|
|
|
|
|
the_climber
Oct 5, 2009, 11:28 PM
Post #30 of 72
(3788 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142
|
notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? How much of Stinkyfinger's old stash did you f'king smoke?
(This post was edited by the_climber on Oct 5, 2009, 11:28 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Oct 6, 2009, 12:48 AM
Post #31 of 72
(3778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation?
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Oct 6, 2009, 12:51 AM
Post #32 of 72
(3777 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? +1
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Oct 6, 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #33 of 72
(3775 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
granite_grrl wrote: So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation? Prolly since your always out on vacation climbing. Jess saying...
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Oct 6, 2009, 12:54 AM
Post #34 of 72
(3772 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
granite_grrl wrote: So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation? is nate shitzing his pants in rage awl over teh sandstone?
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Oct 6, 2009, 1:06 AM
Post #35 of 72
(3764 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
granite_grrl wrote: So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation? because they cannot do it to your face?
|
|
|
|
|
kyleshea
Oct 6, 2009, 1:53 AM
Post #36 of 72
(3758 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 1716
|
the_climber wrote: notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? How much of Stinkyfinger's old stash did you f'king smoke? apparantly all of it
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Oct 6, 2009, 4:23 AM
Post #37 of 72
(3746 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
snoopy138 wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Looks like there's nothing to do now but go back to causing trouble. yep, just going to have to figure owt what to penerate. I called subarus advertising department and told them the knob is owned by a couple guys who got kicked out of NAMBLA for deviancy. Well, that's what I heard!
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Oct 6, 2009, 11:43 AM
Post #38 of 72
(3735 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit. DDT No offense but I'm calling BS. Do you really think that the long threads have nearly as much gravity on the speed of the site as the THOUSANDS of pics that no one has looked at in 8 years (or ever?) or the videos that have 0 views? For that matter, having drop down menus, while practically useless, probably slows shit down as well. Of all the pointless, memory eating shit on the site you decide to take out the things that were used the most, by the most people? Seems like working backwards to me. Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
kyleshea
Oct 6, 2009, 12:08 PM
Post #39 of 72
(3732 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 1716
|
caughtinside wrote: snoopy138 wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Looks like there's nothing to do now but go back to causing trouble. yep, just going to have to figure owt what to penerate. I called subarus advertising department and told them the knob is owned by a couple guys who got kicked out of NAMBLA for deviancy. Well, that's what I heard! 8 year olds dude, 8 year olds.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Oct 6, 2009, 12:48 PM
Post #40 of 72
(3726 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
sungam wrote: No offense but I'm calling BS. Do you really think that the long threads have nearly as much gravity on the speed of the site as the THOUSANDS of pics that no one has looked at in 8 years (or ever?) or the videos that have 0 views? For that matter, having drop down menus, while practically useless, probably slows shit down as well. Of all the pointless, memory eating shit on the site you decide to take out the things that were used the most, by the most people? Seems like working backwards to me. Magnus Actually i think ddt has a point there. In many other forums i visit (and i suppose the3y are based on similar software) threads get locked after they get a certain (much much smaller) size then the giant centipedes over here. Of course just because others are doing it doesnt make it right automatically, but i guess they do have a point. Maybe its just me, but campground is the subforum that takes the longest to load! And i am not shure about the technical background, but arent all the photos and videos that you mention rather static (as you said, no one looks at them) whereas the long threads are not. But i would be really curious what exactly cause the slowdown. I probalbyly wouldnt understand, but inner geek wants to know qwert
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 6, 2009, 3:45 PM
Post #41 of 72
(3722 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
qwert wrote: Maybe its just me, but campground is the subforum that takes the longest to load! It's not just you. I've started to notice an appreciably longer (3x perhaps) load time for campground compared to the others. Of course campground also has the largest thread archive. Not sure which the slowdown is actually a function of, the length of a few threads or the overall volume of threads.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Oct 7, 2009, 12:45 AM
Post #42 of 72
(3695 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. Good to hear that your pop-ups are working well again. Not that everyone doesn't block them anyway. Tool.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:22 AM
Post #43 of 72
(3677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
notapplicable wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no. Hey, the contrarian is back. Hows life treating you these days? Couldn't be better. Well... I could use a harem, $10,000,000, and have the BET reinstated. But other than that, quite well.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:23 AM
Post #44 of 72
(3677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
donald949 wrote: notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? +1 Shouldn't you be watching Mr. Roger's Neighborhood reruns or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:26 AM
Post #45 of 72
(3677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
sungam wrote: ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit. DDT No offense but I'm calling BS. Do you really think that the long threads have nearly as much gravity on the speed of the site as the THOUSANDS of pics that no one has looked at in 8 years (or ever?) or the videos that have 0 views? For that matter, having drop down menus, while practically useless, probably slows shit down as well. Of all the pointless, memory eating shit on the site you decide to take out the things that were used the most, by the most people? Seems like working backwards to me. Magnus Damnz. It pains me so to commend Haggis... so I won't. But stickin it to teh man is a worthy form of PC++
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:27 AM
Post #46 of 72
(3677 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
qwert wrote: Actually i think ddt has a point there. In many other forums i visit (and i suppose the3y are based on similar software) threads get locked after they get a certain (much much smaller) size then the giant centipedes over here. Of course just because others are doing it doesnt make it right automatically, but i guess they do have a point. I missed your point.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 7, 2009, 11:54 AM
Post #47 of 72
(3661 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: notapplicable wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no. Hey, the contrarian is back. Hows life treating you these days? Couldn't be better. Well... I could use a harem, $10,000,000, and have the BET reinstated. But other than that, quite well. Have you considered assassinating youself for the glory of Allah? I hear he's tossing out harems like they were party favors. Its worth a shot anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Oct 7, 2009, 12:13 PM
Post #48 of 72
(3656 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
youre welcome qwert
(This post was edited by qwert on Oct 7, 2009, 12:13 PM)
|
Attachments:
|
point.jpg
(42.4 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Oct 7, 2009, 4:36 PM
Post #49 of 72
(3632 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: donald949 wrote: notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? +1 Shouldn't you be watching Mr. Roger's Neighborhood reruns or something? I try not to. But on occassion catch bits a pieces with the kids.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:41 AM
Post #51 of 72
(4204 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:42 AM
Post #52 of 72
(4204 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:43 AM
Post #53 of 72
(4204 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:43 AM
Post #54 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:44 AM
Post #55 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:56 AM
Post #56 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz!
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:56 AM
Post #57 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
blort
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:57 AM
Post #58 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
A scottish twist?
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:57 AM
Post #59 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
PC McBlort
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:57 AM
Post #60 of 72
(4203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
yawn.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 19, 2010, 9:58 AM
Post #61 of 72
(4202 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
comfy in here, but not so comfy as t3h Ess pee sea eye. Althought the ess pea see aye has sea aye in the name... at least see eye doesn't achally post there...
|
|
|
|
|
hafilax
Apr 19, 2010, 5:08 PM
Post #63 of 72
(4166 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 3025
|
Now that's what I'm talkin' about! That was amazing!
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Apr 20, 2010, 12:34 AM
Post #64 of 72
(4138 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
sungam wrote: oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz! Bored???
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Apr 20, 2010, 12:40 PM
Post #65 of 72
(4113 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz! Bored??? Nah - he's having trouble keeping up, so is hoping to slow everything down to a more "reasonable" pace.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 21, 2010, 1:11 PM
Post #66 of 72
(4074 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz! Bored??? Wuz at werke.
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Apr 23, 2010, 8:23 PM
Post #67 of 72
(4045 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
sungam wrote: donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz! Bored??? Wuz at werke. Well you have a long way to go to before this thread gets too long and starts having performance issues...
|
|
|
|
|
bill413
Apr 24, 2010, 2:54 AM
Post #68 of 72
(4033 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 19, 2004
Posts: 5674
|
donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz! Bored??? Wuz at werke. Well you have a long way to go to before this thread gets too long and starts having performance issues... That post was too long.
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Apr 26, 2010, 6:10 PM
Post #69 of 72
(4012 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
bill413 wrote: donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: donald949 wrote: sungam wrote: oh noez! T3h PC++ hoarz have come 2 sloez t3h sitez speedz! Bored??? Wuz at werke. Well you have a long way to go to before this thread gets too long and starts having performance issues... That post was too long.
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Apr 26, 2010, 6:21 PM
Post #70 of 72
(4007 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
wopp wopp
|
|
|
|
|
climbingtrash
Feb 20, 2011, 4:32 AM
Post #71 of 72
(3819 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 5114
|
Y U guyz not invite meh?
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Feb 20, 2011, 4:59 AM
Post #72 of 72
(3796 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
According to my TV, there are several pills that could help with knob related performance issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|