|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 5, 2009, 9:42 PM
Post #26 of 72
(3819 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something.
I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 10:57 PM
Post #27 of 72
(3808 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no.
Hey, the contrarian is back.
Hows life treating you these days?
|
|
|
|
|
the_climber
Oct 5, 2009, 11:06 PM
Post #28 of 72
(3800 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142
|
Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 5, 2009, 11:26 PM
Post #29 of 72
(3794 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread.
Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family?
|
|
|
|
|
the_climber
Oct 5, 2009, 11:28 PM
Post #30 of 72
(3791 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142
|
notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family?
How much of Stinkyfinger's old stash did you f'king smoke?
(This post was edited by the_climber on Oct 5, 2009, 11:28 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
granite_grrl
Oct 6, 2009, 12:48 AM
Post #31 of 72
(3781 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 25, 2002
Posts: 15084
|
So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation?
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Oct 6, 2009, 12:51 AM
Post #32 of 72
(3780 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family?
+1
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Oct 6, 2009, 12:52 AM
Post #33 of 72
(3778 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
granite_grrl wrote: So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation?
Jess saying...
|
|
|
|
|
snoopy138
Oct 6, 2009, 12:54 AM
Post #34 of 72
(3775 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2004
Posts: 28992
|
granite_grrl wrote: So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation?
is nate shitzing his pants in rage awl over teh sandstone?
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Oct 6, 2009, 1:06 AM
Post #35 of 72
(3767 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
granite_grrl wrote: So....why does this stuff always happen when we're away on vacation?
|
|
|
|
|
kyleshea
Oct 6, 2009, 1:53 AM
Post #36 of 72
(3761 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 1716
|
the_climber wrote: notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? How much of Stinkyfinger's old stash did you f'king smoke?
apparantly all of it
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Oct 6, 2009, 4:23 AM
Post #37 of 72
(3749 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
snoopy138 wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Looks like there's nothing to do now but go back to causing trouble. yep, just going to have to figure owt what to penerate.
I called subarus advertising department and told them the knob is owned by a couple guys who got kicked out of NAMBLA for deviancy.
Well, that's what I heard!
|
|
|
|
|
sungam
Oct 6, 2009, 11:43 AM
Post #38 of 72
(3738 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit.  DDT
Do you really think that the long threads have nearly as much gravity on the speed of the site as the THOUSANDS of pics that no one has looked at in 8 years (or ever?) or the videos that have 0 views?
For that matter, having drop down menus, while practically useless, probably slows shit down as well. Of all the pointless, memory eating shit on the site you decide to take out the things that were used the most, by the most people?
Seems like working backwards to me.
Magnus
|
|
|
|
|
kyleshea
Oct 6, 2009, 12:08 PM
Post #39 of 72
(3735 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 21, 2006
Posts: 1716
|
caughtinside wrote: snoopy138 wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Looks like there's nothing to do now but go back to causing trouble. yep, just going to have to figure owt what to penerate. I called subarus advertising department and told them the knob is owned by a couple guys who got kicked out of NAMBLA for deviancy. Well, that's what I heard!
8 year olds dude, 8 year olds.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Oct 6, 2009, 12:48 PM
Post #40 of 72
(3729 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
sungam wrote: No offense but I'm calling BS. Do you really think that the long threads have nearly as much gravity on the speed of the site as the THOUSANDS of pics that no one has looked at in 8 years (or ever?) or the videos that have 0 views? For that matter, having drop down menus, while practically useless, probably slows shit down as well. Of all the pointless, memory eating shit on the site you decide to take out the things that were used the most, by the most people? Seems like working backwards to me. Magnus
In many other forums i visit (and i suppose the3y are based on similar software) threads get locked after they get a certain (much much smaller) size then the giant centipedes over here. Of course just because others are doing it doesnt make it right automatically, but i guess they do have a point.
Maybe its just me, but campground is the subforum that takes the longest to load!
And i am not shure about the technical background, but arent all the photos and videos that you mention rather static (as you said, no one looks at them) whereas the long threads are not.
But i would be really curious what exactly cause the slowdown. I probalbyly wouldnt understand, but inner geek wants to know 
qwert
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 6, 2009, 3:45 PM
Post #41 of 72
(3725 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
qwert wrote: Maybe its just me, but campground is the subforum that takes the longest to load!
It's not just you. I've started to notice an appreciably longer (3x perhaps) load time for campground compared to the others.
Of course campground also has the largest thread archive. Not sure which the slowdown is actually a function of, the length of a few threads or the overall volume of threads.
|
|
|
|
|
chossmonkey
Oct 7, 2009, 12:45 AM
Post #42 of 72
(3698 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414
|
ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over.
Tool.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:22 AM
Post #43 of 72
(3680 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
notapplicable wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no. Hey, the contrarian is back. Hows life treating you these days?
Couldn't be better.
Well... I could use a harem, $10,000,000, and have the BET reinstated. But other than that, quite well.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:23 AM
Post #44 of 72
(3680 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
donald949 wrote: notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? +1
Shouldn't you be watching Mr. Roger's Neighborhood reruns or something?
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:26 AM
Post #45 of 72
(3680 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
sungam wrote: ddt wrote: Hi everyone, A few days ago we started noticing severe load issues on Rockclimbing.com with the database server getting overloaded, causing everything to back up and queries to slow way down until the site falls over. We traced the problem to a few very long threads in the Campground forum. So unfortunately we have to lock all threads with more than 25,000 replies, which includes the following: Klownjaya's sulking thread.... -- 96782 replies The Lounge™ -- 26571 replies Sty's Post Count Increaser -- 25993 replies PeeeGhey Tea shop...less tempting? -- 25029 replies I've created a new thread (called "PART 2") for the first 3 threads above (which are still active), with a link to the locked PART 1 thread as the opening post. Sorry for the inconvenience. And congratulations for taking us to the limit. DDT No offense but I'm calling BS. Do you really think that the long threads have nearly as much gravity on the speed of the site as the THOUSANDS of pics that no one has looked at in 8 years (or ever?) or the videos that have 0 views? For that matter, having drop down menus, while practically useless, probably slows shit down as well. Of all the pointless, memory eating shit on the site you decide to take out the things that were used the most, by the most people? Seems like working backwards to me. Magnus
Damnz. It pains me so to commend Haggis... so I won't. But stickin it to teh man is a worthy form of PC++
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Oct 7, 2009, 7:27 AM
Post #46 of 72
(3680 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
qwert wrote: Actually i think ddt has a point there. In many other forums i visit (and i suppose the3y are based on similar software) threads get locked after they get a certain (much much smaller) size then the giant centipedes over here. Of course just because others are doing it doesnt make it right automatically, but i guess they do have a point.
I missed your point.
|
|
|
|
|
notapplicable
Oct 7, 2009, 11:54 AM
Post #47 of 72
(3664 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: notapplicable wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: kriso9tails wrote: notapplicable wrote: I wonder if SWA? I couldn't figure out what that meant until just now. I was just too lazy to search and too proud to ask before... or something. I'm beginning to think they don't know what it means either because I'm quite certain the answer is no. Hey, the contrarian is back. Hows life treating you these days? Couldn't be better. Well... I could use a harem, $10,000,000, and have the BET reinstated. But other than that, quite well.
Have you considered assassinating youself for the glory of Allah? I hear he's tossing out harems like they were party favors.
Its worth a shot anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
qwert
Oct 7, 2009, 12:13 PM
Post #48 of 72
(3659 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 24, 2004
Posts: 2394
|
youre welcome
qwert
(This post was edited by qwert on Oct 7, 2009, 12:13 PM)
|
|
Attachments:
|
point.jpg
(42.4 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
donald949
Oct 7, 2009, 4:36 PM
Post #49 of 72
(3635 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 24, 2007
Posts: 11455
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: donald949 wrote: notapplicable wrote: the_climber wrote: Some how I see this thread being the next problem, too long, stealing all the bandwidth thread. Perhaps this will be the beginning of a kinder gentler whorefest, one where we can all ++ together like one big loving family? +1 Shouldn't you be watching Mr. Roger's Neighborhood reruns or something?
I try not to. But on occassion catch bits a pieces with the kids.
|
|
|
|
|
|
