Forums: Climbing Disciplines: Trad Climbing:
Help Convert Me!
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Trad Climbing

Premier Sponsor:

 


ecade


Jun 24, 2011, 7:20 PM
Post #1 of 122 (16209 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2011
Posts: 132

Help Convert Me!
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Happy Friday,

Don't you wish this day would end and you could be on the crag?

You see, whether you climb sport or trad, we can all agree that we'd rather be on the rock than office.

So I'm a sport climber, my best lead was an 11b, 1 take. And now, I think i'm ready to learn Trad.

I'm not looking to fully convert, yet.

What do people recommend for techinques and drills to learn placement and become comfortable on it?
to make a long story short: I was doing my first trad route, a 5.6 last saturday, I placed exact gear in exact spots as instructed, but it just seemed non-sensical, I'm climbing a route that I know I shouldn't fall on, on protection that I don't feel comfortable falling on, with the hopes that I will become comfortable to fall on it by not falling on it? Is it just me or do the means not logical result in the desired ends of being comfortable falling on Trad.

So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

I was thinking of trying a sport route, clipping a bolt, placing a piece of pro a few feet above the bolt, climbing above trad pro and then taking falls and learning and getting comfortable like that.

I have friends who have the gear, knowledge, and are generous with their time to teach me, but I am not fully comfortable with they methods they have used.

Suggestions, personal experience etc... are very welcome.

I'd offer to teach you sport climbing, but lets face it, I'm sure y'all know how to layback on a crack :)

Cheers and Thank you


saymurphy


Jun 24, 2011, 7:50 PM
Post #2 of 122 (16186 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Oct 5, 2008
Posts: 18

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

If you don't trust your mentor, find a new one. Failing that, top-rope aid (with partner or solo).


michael1245


Jun 24, 2011, 8:01 PM
Post #3 of 122 (16177 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 23, 2010
Posts: 247

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

1. trad traverse

2. G-Rated Routes

3. whenever possible, place two pieces of pro


erisspirit


Jun 24, 2011, 8:06 PM
Post #4 of 122 (16170 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 3770

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (4 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm still learning, so all I can really comment on is what is working for me. (I was already leading sport before trad)

I started by following a lot (and reading the John Long anchors book). Before cleaning each piece I would inspect it, and see what my experienced partner was doing. If I had any questions I asked. Next my partner helped me with my own placements on the ground, and did some anchor practice. Then I started leading on really simple easy to protect climbing. My partner would follow then give me a critique on each placement. I'm slowly working my way to harder routes, as well as climbing more on my own without an experienced partner blessing every placement Tongue...

As for trusting the gear, the more I place gear the more I trust it, and myself. I took my first lead fall on gear by a slip of the foot. I don't really feel like you need to be taking big falls on your gear to learn the gear.

Hopefully people with more experience with trad and teaching trad might be able to help more.


kennoyce


Jun 24, 2011, 8:46 PM
Post #5 of 122 (16136 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 6, 2001
Posts: 1338

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
Happy Friday,

Don't you wish this day would end and you could be on the crag?

You see, whether you climb sport or trad, we can all agree that we'd rather be on the rock than office.

So I'm a sport climber, my best lead was an 11b, 1 take. And now, I think i'm ready to learn Trad.

I'm not looking to fully convert, yet.

What do people recommend for techinques and drills to learn placement and become comfortable on it?
to make a long story short: I was doing my first trad route, a 5.6 last saturday, I placed exact gear in exact spots as instructed, but it just seemed non-sensical, I'm climbing a route that I know I shouldn't fall on, on protection that I don't feel comfortable falling on, with the hopes that I will become comfortable to fall on it by not falling on it? Is it just me or do the means not logical result in the desired ends of being comfortable falling on Trad.

So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

I was thinking of trying a sport route, clipping a bolt, placing a piece of pro a few feet above the bolt, climbing above trad pro and then taking falls and learning and getting comfortable like that.

I have friends who have the gear, knowledge, and are generous with their time to teach me, but I am not fully comfortable with they methods they have used.

Suggestions, personal experience etc... are very welcome.

I'd offer to teach you sport climbing, but lets face it, I'm sure y'all know how to layback on a crack :)

Cheers and Thank you


I'd say that the Bosch bulldog is a good drill for converting trad routes to sport routes so that you feel more comfortable falling.

Hopefully thats the answer you were looking for since I just kind of glazed over your question;)


swoopee


Jun 24, 2011, 11:38 PM
Post #6 of 122 (16072 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 17, 2008
Posts: 560

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ya gotta crawl before you can fly. Learn to place gear on easy terrain with someone you trust. When you feel comfortable doing that then start moving up the grades. If you know that your placements are good you will trust them when the time comes.


blueeyedclimber


Jun 25, 2011, 1:56 AM
Post #7 of 122 (16037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
What do people recommend for techinques and drills to learn placement and become comfortable on it?
to make a long story short: I was doing my first trad route, a 5.6 last saturday, I placed exact gear in exact spots as instructed, but it just seemed non-sensical, I'm climbing a route that I know I shouldn't fall on, on protection that I don't feel comfortable falling on, with the hopes that I will become comfortable to fall on it by not falling on it? Is it just me or do the means not logical result in the desired ends of being comfortable falling on Trad.

Climbing on gear has a MUCH longer learning process than sport does. Climbing easy routes and placing a lot of gear is part of that process. This is the one problem I see with today's progression of going from sport to trad. People get strong with sport climbing real quick and then want to transfer that to climbing on gear. I mean, who wants to dial it back 3 or 4 grades. It can be very frustrating.

The problem is, is that there is a lot of learning that goes on with those easier routes. Gear placement, rope management, building anchors, direction of pull, multidirectional pieces, zippering, running it out, sewing it up, belaying your second, and on and on.

In reply to:
So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

Place a lot of gear, on the ground and on easier routes. Read. A LOT. Get advice from as many different experienced climbers as possible.
In reply to:
I was thinking of trying a sport route, clipping a bolt, placing a piece of pro a few feet above the bolt, climbing above trad pro and then taking falls and learning and getting comfortable like that.

Well, where I'm from there are not very many sport routes that will take gear. But, if there is where you are, then sure.

In reply to:
I have friends who have the gear, knowledge, and are generous with their time to teach me, but I am not fully comfortable with they methods they have used.

For example? Why are you not comfortable with them? You just said they have the knowledge.

In reply to:
Suggestions, personal experience etc... are very welcome.

Back when I was learning trad, I was also making the jump from sport and was starting to climb harder. I didn't take as much time learning gear as I should have. I had no business being on something I could have fallen on. Well, I did and pulled two pieces and hit the ground. I was lucky and only got a badly sprained ankle. I learned more that day than any other day out climbing and i'm a better climber today because of it, but it could have been much worse. Like I said, I was lucky.


Good luck!

Josh


brian_h


Jun 25, 2011, 4:28 AM
Post #8 of 122 (15982 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 24, 2010
Posts: 59

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Consider hiring a professional guide or attending a climbing course. I'm a new trad leader and the first course I took last year focused on gear placements, physics behind falls, building anchors and basic equipment safety type stuff. It was the precursor course to single pitch lead, but we did talk our guide into doing some mock leads. I tied into two ropes, one on a toprope belay and one lead belay. I thought it was a good way to get acclimated to placing gear. Also, I carried a sling on my tie-in loops to clip each piece and put body weight on it to gain confidence in my placements.

I really found a renewed trust in gear when I took a 45' fall last month. I was caught by a .5 BD cam on two lobes. Fairly dumb of me to end up in that situation, but given the outcome I was also lucky to be able to walk away and learn a valuable lesson in placing gear more frequently.

Hope that helps.


(This post was edited by brian_h on Jun 25, 2011, 4:35 AM)


TarHeelEMT


Jun 25, 2011, 5:44 AM
Post #9 of 122 (15963 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Aid climbing (even on top rope) is a great way to learn to trust your gear. Climb on top rope and heartily bounce test everything.


rtwilli4


Jun 25, 2011, 9:48 AM
Post #10 of 122 (15943 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 1867

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

Follow as many pitches as you can. If you're friends like to climb on gear then it should be easy for you to follow and clean their gear. You'll learn a lot about how things work by doing this.

But when leading, you do have to start on easy terrain so that you'll think more about your gear than you do about the climbing. Just place as much gear as you can. If you know that the anchor is bolted or a tree or chockstone or something, you should place every piece of gear you have on the way up.

Being uncomfortable about the gear you place is just part of the learning process. If you trusted the gear right away there would be something wrong with you (just like there is something wrong with most sport climbers that have blind faith in bolts). The more gear you place, the more confident you will get in your ability to protect yourself and the harder you will climb. Then one day, you will fall, and the gear will work, and you'll be fine.

I don't think placing gear and falling on purpose is a good idea. Especially when you are still learning. What if it comes out? Even if the bolt keeps you from getting hurt, your confidence will be shot and you will have taken a step backwards.

I also don't think it's a good idea to have someone telling you when and where to place gear. Everyone sees protection differently, and being instructed from the ground can even be dangerous since the person can't see what you are doing.

But yea, climbing easy routes that you shouldn't fall off of, placing gear that you wouldn't want to fall on, will help you learn how to trad climb. Just keep doing it.


sbaclimber


Jun 25, 2011, 11:38 AM
Post #11 of 122 (15928 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
I'm climbing a route that I know I shouldn't fall on, on protection that I don't feel comfortable falling on, with the hopes that I will become comfortable to fall on it by not falling on it?
If it is any consolation, I have been climbing over 15 years and am still not comfortable falling, regardless of whether on gear or bolts. Most of the time, it has little to do with the quality of the pro, it is just an irrational feeling that I have not trained myself enough fully have under control. Based on a fair amount of experience, I can generally gauge whether a placement is good or not...and try even harder not to fall accordingly.

In addition to the good advice posted by others above (practice, inspection by experienced climbers, etc), you might also try bounce-testing placements and aid-climbing, both close to the ground and not above pointy rocks or sticks. Tongue
I have had some surprises doing this, which have quickly put me back on the ground and made me reevaluate what a "good" placement is (especially with C3s in hard/smooth rock).


(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Jun 25, 2011, 11:41 AM)


Partner j_ung


Jun 25, 2011, 12:09 PM
Post #12 of 122 (15918 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

blueeyedclimber wrote:
ecade wrote:
What do people recommend for techinques and drills to learn placement and become comfortable on it?
to make a long story short: I was doing my first trad route, a 5.6 last saturday, I placed exact gear in exact spots as instructed, but it just seemed non-sensical, I'm climbing a route that I know I shouldn't fall on, on protection that I don't feel comfortable falling on, with the hopes that I will become comfortable to fall on it by not falling on it? Is it just me or do the means not logical result in the desired ends of being comfortable falling on Trad.

Climbing on gear has a MUCH longer learning process than sport does. Climbing easy routes and placing a lot of gear is part of that process. This is the one problem I see with today's progression of going from sport to trad. People get strong with sport climbing real quick and then want to transfer that to climbing on gear. I mean, who wants to dial it back 3 or 4 grades. It can be very frustrating.

The problem is, is that there is a lot of learning that goes on with those easier routes. Gear placement, rope management, building anchors, direction of pull, multidirectional pieces, zippering, running it out, sewing it up, belaying your second, and on and on.

In reply to:
So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

Place a lot of gear, on the ground and on easier routes. Read. A LOT. Get advice from as many different experienced climbers as possible.
In reply to:
I was thinking of trying a sport route, clipping a bolt, placing a piece of pro a few feet above the bolt, climbing above trad pro and then taking falls and learning and getting comfortable like that.

Well, where I'm from there are not very many sport routes that will take gear. But, if there is where you are, then sure.

In reply to:
I have friends who have the gear, knowledge, and are generous with their time to teach me, but I am not fully comfortable with they methods they have used.

For example? Why are you not comfortable with them? You just said they have the knowledge.

In reply to:
Suggestions, personal experience etc... are very welcome.

Back when I was learning trad, I was also making the jump from sport and was starting to climb harder. I didn't take as much time learning gear as I should have. I had no business being on something I could have fallen on. Well, I did and pulled two pieces and hit the ground. I was lucky and only got a badly sprained ankle. I learned more that day than any other day out climbing and i'm a better climber today because of it, but it could have been much worse. Like I said, I was lucky.


Good luck!

Josh

This is an excellent post. A lot of people want to transition from sport to trad in a few days, but that's a ridiculous proposition. Those people are building a house of cards upon a foundation that is woefully lacking in rockcraft and basic mountaineering skills. Granted, single pitch trad doesn't require as much of such things as do longer, more committing routes, but the analogy holds, IMO.

This story of what happened on a 5.7 to a guy who has climbed 5.13 should be required reading for badass sport climbers who want to learn to plug gear.


jeepnphreak


Jun 25, 2011, 5:22 PM
Post #13 of 122 (15854 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Watch this its is about Pierces pass that someone used the wrong bolts on very soft rock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQt4AbQmJjE

At least when Trad climbing you placed the gear and know if its good or not. You never what monkey place a set of bolts. Blind faith in sport climbers is amazing


healyje


Jun 25, 2011, 7:26 PM
Post #14 of 122 (15814 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The name of the game in learning trad climbing is and always will be finding and seconding experienced leaders - everything else is a less desirable way to learn trad. You don't say where you're from, but I'd say really do some detective work to try and find out who's doing trad in your area and do whatever's necessary to get in as many pitches with them as possible.

Barring that, then walking the base with a couple of slings placing and weighting pro is a good way to learn about placing and removing gear. As mentioned by others here, leading way easy routes placing lots of pro is the way to go if you can't find experienced trad leaders to second. Double up on the pro on anything that's a potential ground fall or makes you nervous.

Skip any form of top rope 'leading' - it's counterproductive. Better to learn to aid climb if it comes down to that.

In general when placing gear, the name of the game is geometry, geometry, geometry - especially with passive gear (nuts and hexs). Really get in there and study a potential placement down to the millimeter level for shape, constrictions, bumps, texture, debris, etc. - don't just slap something in.

The ideal for a nut placement is one where the geometry is doing all the work and needs either no 'setting' or a breathe of one, holds a fall, and still comes out easy. Remember it's not just about putting them in, they have to be reasonable to clean or it will be a nightmare for your second and slow going.

And it doesn't matter how long someone's been climbing, or how old they are, if they slam a cam where there's a solid nut placement then they're a noob. In general, always prefer passive placements (nuts) when they present themselves. Don't become someone who simply slamming cams as you'll not develop the skills necessary for when things get dicey and technical on the protection front.

Last, don't sport climb on gear (sprad climbing) - don't hang or rest on your gear - it isn't trad climbing and climbing on gear isn't the sole definition of 'trad climbing'. If anything, that by itself would be a 'souless' definition of trad climbing. The essence of trad climbing isn't gear vs. bolts, but rather not resting on the rope vs hanging (dogging) your way up routes.

In the beginning climb easier routes until you are confident in your pro and understand it what it's about and then push up the level of difficulty as you become more confident in your placements. Once you are actually confident and probably have taken a fall or two along the way then go for it. At that point when you fall, lower either back to the belay or to the last solid rest and give it another go - don't dog up the route - it isn't trad climbing and it will definitely bite you in the ass with a failed placement sooner or later.

Again, try to find experienced leaders to follow - it's the best way to learn.


(This post was edited by healyje on Jun 25, 2011, 7:27 PM)


ianwatson


Jun 27, 2011, 5:46 PM
Post #15 of 122 (15715 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 31, 2010
Posts: 66

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

follow as many people as you can, practice placing gear on the ground. climb very easy routes till you are 100% your gear is good. get a few anchor books and fredom of the hills and understand what you are doing. you dont want to push your climbing limit and placing gear at the same time, just take it easy and dont rush to lead harder untill your gear is bomber.


ps. Yer gonna die!!!


oldgray


Jun 27, 2011, 8:57 PM
Post #16 of 122 (15669 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 12, 2009
Posts: 1

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

33 years traditional climbing; two leader falls; one at Seneca W Va and one at Gunks NY.
Now living/climbing in western NC. Never used a mechanical piece of protection.
Climbing is NO FUN if you are not worried about falling.
Who really knows how to learn ? You could get top roped while leading then have placements critiqued by an "expert" but who knows what makes a real expert.
Best wishes; enjoy the adventure !
Gray Climber


healyje


Jun 27, 2011, 9:01 PM
Post #17 of 122 (15661 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [oldgray] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

oldgray wrote:
33 years traditional climbing; two leader falls; one at Seneca W Va and one at Gunks NY.
Now living/climbing in western NC. Never used a mechanical piece of protection.
Climbing is NO FUN if you are not worried about falling.
Who really knows how to learn ? You could get top roped while leading then have placements critiqued by an "expert" but who knows what makes a real expert.
Best wishes; enjoy the adventure !
Gray Climber

Hmmm, 37 years here and still take solid falls a good half dozen times a year. To each his own and I do know a lot of old "leader must not fall" folks - just never been one of them myself.

That said, when you're learning isn't the time to go winging around on gear.

Also, if you have an 'expert' on the scene who can critique your gear then I'd say the better use their time is to have them lead something and you second it.


Partner cracklover


Jun 27, 2011, 10:44 PM
Post #18 of 122 (15623 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [j_ung] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

j_ung wrote:
blueeyedclimber wrote:
ecade wrote:
What do people recommend for techinques and drills to learn placement and become comfortable on it?
to make a long story short: I was doing my first trad route, a 5.6 last saturday, I placed exact gear in exact spots as instructed, but it just seemed non-sensical, I'm climbing a route that I know I shouldn't fall on, on protection that I don't feel comfortable falling on, with the hopes that I will become comfortable to fall on it by not falling on it? Is it just me or do the means not logical result in the desired ends of being comfortable falling on Trad.

Climbing on gear has a MUCH longer learning process than sport does. Climbing easy routes and placing a lot of gear is part of that process. This is the one problem I see with today's progression of going from sport to trad. People get strong with sport climbing real quick and then want to transfer that to climbing on gear. I mean, who wants to dial it back 3 or 4 grades. It can be very frustrating.

The problem is, is that there is a lot of learning that goes on with those easier routes. Gear placement, rope management, building anchors, direction of pull, multidirectional pieces, zippering, running it out, sewing it up, belaying your second, and on and on.

In reply to:
So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

Place a lot of gear, on the ground and on easier routes. Read. A LOT. Get advice from as many different experienced climbers as possible.
In reply to:
I was thinking of trying a sport route, clipping a bolt, placing a piece of pro a few feet above the bolt, climbing above trad pro and then taking falls and learning and getting comfortable like that.

Well, where I'm from there are not very many sport routes that will take gear. But, if there is where you are, then sure.

In reply to:
I have friends who have the gear, knowledge, and are generous with their time to teach me, but I am not fully comfortable with they methods they have used.

For example? Why are you not comfortable with them? You just said they have the knowledge.

In reply to:
Suggestions, personal experience etc... are very welcome.

Back when I was learning trad, I was also making the jump from sport and was starting to climb harder. I didn't take as much time learning gear as I should have. I had no business being on something I could have fallen on. Well, I did and pulled two pieces and hit the ground. I was lucky and only got a badly sprained ankle. I learned more that day than any other day out climbing and i'm a better climber today because of it, but it could have been much worse. Like I said, I was lucky.


Good luck!

Josh

This is an excellent post. A lot of people want to transition from sport to trad in a few days, but that's a ridiculous proposition. Those people are building a house of cards upon a foundation that is woefully lacking in rockcraft and basic mountaineering skills. Granted, single pitch trad doesn't require as much of such things as do longer, more committing routes, but the analogy holds, IMO.

This story of what happened on a 5.7 to a guy who has climbed 5.13 should be required reading for badass sport climbers who want to learn to plug gear.

Yes, it is an excellent post. The one major thing he didn't mention, though, is attitude. You need to have a whole different mind to climb trad than to climb sport. The good trad leader thinks very much like a first ascentionist - looking up, reading the rock, picking out the most reasonable line, and plotting how to get up it safely and efficiently. The set of skills involved can take years to hone.

GO


jacques


Jun 28, 2011, 2:43 AM
Post #19 of 122 (15581 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

Safe, means that when you fall, you are not going to injure yourself. On a 5.11, where you plug the pro in the rock¸, it is safe to fall with a boltt or a cam in a crack. When you climb ten feet of 5.7, two moves of 5.8 and a run out in a 5.10... it could be dangerous to fall.

Trad is mostly to be able to see the danger and to find a way to avoid it. Example: you don`t need to be able to place a good pro, you need to be able to place a pro in a shity placement.

One curious think about the difference between trad and sport is that the beginer learn the limit of the technique in trad and the limit of his body in sport. I often saw sport climber jumping on a hold without testing it. In trad, you have to make an evaluation of where I fall if the hold broke, decide wihich technique to use and make the move. for example, you can do a barn door or a flag. With a flag, you load the hold with one hand and if the hold broke, your back fall first and will hit a rock first (results; injure vertebra). With a barn door, you will fall on your feet.

Limiting trad at the idea of placing gear is offencing. One can make a run out of 30 feet with a fall in the air and be safe in trad. What happen in a fall, from the moment you lost contact with the rock to the moment you rest on the end of the rope? it is really what it is important to learn in trad.


superchuffer


Jun 28, 2011, 11:16 AM
Post #20 of 122 (15525 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2011
Posts: 294

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

start by placing knotted ropes, hexes, and tri-cams. you will learn more than that than by using sticky rubber and those cheater cams.


sbaclimber


Jun 28, 2011, 11:38 AM
Post #21 of 122 (15511 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [superchuffer] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

superchuffer wrote:
start by placing knotted ropes, hexes, and tri-cams. you will learn more than that than by using sticky rubber and those cheater cams.
In other words, climb barefoot. Cool

Any reason for recommending knotted ropes and hexes, but not nuts?


ceebo


Jun 28, 2011, 12:15 PM
Post #22 of 122 (15504 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 862

Re: [jacques] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

jacques wrote:
ecade wrote:
So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

Safe, means that when you fall, you are not going to injure yourself. On a 5.11, where you plug the pro in the rock¸, it is safe to fall with a boltt or a cam in a crack. When you climb ten feet of 5.7, two moves of 5.8 and a run out in a 5.10... it could be dangerous to fall.

Trad is mostly to be able to see the danger and to find a way to avoid it. Example: you don`t need to be able to place a good pro, you need to be able to place a pro in a shity placement.

One curious think about the difference between trad and sport is that the beginer learn the limit of the technique in trad and the limit of his body in sport. I often saw sport climber jumping on a hold without testing it. In trad, you have to make an evaluation of where I fall if the hold broke, decide wihich technique to use and make the move. for example, you can do a barn door or a flag. With a flag, you load the hold with one hand and if the hold broke, your back fall first and will hit a rock first (results; injure vertebra). With a barn door, you will fall on your feet.

Limiting trad at the idea of placing gear is offencing. One can make a run out of 30 feet with a fall in the air and be safe in trad. What happen in a fall, from the moment you lost contact with the rock to the moment you rest on the end of the rope? it is really what it is important to learn in trad.

Barndoor's take place when your body weight is past its base support (example, feet left, torso right, remove left supporting hand). If the hold brakes during a barn door how can you possibly expect to gain control of your fall during a ''move'' that had no control in the first place?.

Also, if you are past your base support, any ''push'' from the foot in contact will only result in generating momentum into the direction you were already going to go... and that is onto your back/side.


jacques


Jun 28, 2011, 4:50 PM
Post #23 of 122 (15463 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318

Re: [ceebo] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ceebo wrote:
[
Barndoor's take place when your body weight is past its base support (example, feet left, torso right, remove left supporting hand). If the hold brakes during a barn door how can you possibly expect to gain control of your fall during a ''move'' that had no control in the first place?.

if you do a barn door and the hold that you reach broke, you can fall on the feet in the same side, if it is the holding hand which broke, you fall on the opposite feet and if it is the foothold, you fall on both feet. after that analysis, you can place the pro in the direction of the fall.

A barn door have a control, bo we need more strenght to make the move. meaning a lost of energy. You have to decide between safety and energy. With a bolt, the analysis is not necessary and the flag is better.


superchuffer


Jun 28, 2011, 6:21 PM
Post #24 of 122 (15441 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2011
Posts: 294

Re: [sbaclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Any reason for recommending knotted ropes and hexes, but not nuts?

good point. he'll definitely need some big nuts.


superchuffer


Jun 28, 2011, 6:23 PM
Post #25 of 122 (15439 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2011
Posts: 294

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

best way to train for trad action is to roll with all the gear you own on you in the gym. training weight from all the jinglies. make sure you wear some slings over your shoulder too.


wmfork


Jun 28, 2011, 7:20 PM
Post #26 of 122 (5598 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 4, 2006
Posts: 348

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Like others said, start with easier routes, not necessaries the easiest in terms of grade, but easy to protect and as clean of a fall line as possible. As far as following a trad leader goes, I'm not sure if I ever gained that much by looking at other people's placements (it only helps so much before you start placing your own gear), but one thing it really helps is getting you used to being in a stance for cleaning or placing gear. The better you get finding/hanging at a stance (something you typically don't need nearly as much in sport climbing), the easier it will be for you to explore good placements.


stealth


Jun 29, 2011, 1:59 AM
Post #27 of 122 (5580 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 29, 2011
Posts: 44

Re: [superchuffer] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

superchuffer wrote:
start by placing knotted ropes, hexes, and tri-cams. you will learn more than that than by using sticky rubber and those cheater cams.

Oh, is that best?


jacques


Jun 30, 2011, 12:07 PM
Post #28 of 122 (5539 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
So what do people recommend as SAFE, ways for a Sport climber to learn Trad?

When I climbed in remote area. Two climbers and nobody else miles a way, I have to make an evaluation of the danger.
First, I evaluate the difficulty of a move and my physical condition/capacity to do a move from zero fall and 100%.
Second, I make an evalution of the consequences of the fall.
after I compare my evaluation with the level of risk acceptable for me.

Actually, I do that instinctively, but when I began, I use more time at each moves to deeply understand what I am doing.


puravida9539


Jul 2, 2011, 8:31 PM
Post #29 of 122 (5509 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 6, 2011
Posts: 52

Re: [jacques] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This thread appears to have branched into two discussions. 1st, the OP question of how to learn trad. 2nd, whether barn-dooring or flagging is more dangerous.

1. Follow good trad climbers, and when that isn't possible (because there are not any available) top rope aid climb. Bounce test everything vigorously and you will begin to get a feel for good placements. Bounce them really hard. This will help you gain trust in the gear by letting you see how much force it can take.

2. I would think that you would not want to trad climb in places where the holds are likely to break off. If you have to consider whether a barn door out of control would be safer than flagging if the hold breaks, how can you trust your gear in a fall? If the rock is that chossy you might not want to assume that your cams and nuts aren't also going to be breaking rock.


jacques


Jul 4, 2011, 10:44 AM
Post #30 of 122 (5474 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 14, 2008
Posts: 318

Re: [puravida9539] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

puravida9539 wrote:
1. Follow good trad climbers, and when that isn't possible (because there are not any available) top rope aid climb. Bounce test everything vigorously and you will begin to get a feel for good placements. Bounce them really hard. This will help you gain trust in the gear by letting you see how much force it can take.

I use to place one pro, remove it, place an other, remove it and use the third pro for a same placement. In that way, there is always a bad pro and if you look at it, you will see how they rotate and you are going to fall. Boncing very hard is generally a bad time for the second who have to remove the pro. You can generate 3 or 4 hundred pounds, but never the thousan that a real fall will gave


ecade


Jul 11, 2011, 8:18 PM
Post #31 of 122 (5400 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2011
Posts: 132

Re: [blueeyedclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

A Sincere thank you for the time and effort, many of the replies were incredibly helpful.

Yesterday I led my first trad route!!! Onsighted a 5.2, Ya baby I'm hardcore Cool It was the easiest route (grade wise) I have ever climbed and it was also the scariest and most mentally challenging route I have ever climbedLaugh [/laugh]


Blue Eyed, I found your post to be incredibly helpful and inspiring so a special thanks to you.

I'd love any advice anyone can offer for excercises to train myself to find good rest positions and comfy places to plug.

If I can ask, and I know comparing yourself to others is fruitless but it if there is enough data, and that is kept in mind, some interesting conclusions can be drawn.

How long did it take people until they felt confident in being able to look at a crack and know within 1-2 pieces, what type and size pro should be placed. Is this even a goal worth striving towards?

How long did it take people until they felt comfortable falling on their gear?

Just to confirm my thoughts on a matter: Just because an anchor built with gear holds the seconder doesn't mean those placements could hold a leader fall. This is becasue the anchor, if equalized will distribute the weight, and the force of the seconder on the pro is less than that of a fall by the leader. Does direction of pull play a factor too?


Again, sorry to be a nag, but I'm a N00B, thanks again for the advice and support. I love sport , but Trad is rad, its a game of chess with your life on the line, and where you hope your opponent never moves, a true act of humility and patience, and it offers a view!


superchuffer


Jul 11, 2011, 9:21 PM
Post #32 of 122 (5387 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2011
Posts: 294

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

did you wear a helmet, spend over 30 minutes on the route, and take way too much gear? ...these are very important to being a trad


sbaclimber


Jul 11, 2011, 9:31 PM
Post #33 of 122 (5379 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [superchuffer] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

superchuffer wrote:
did you wear a helmet, spend over 30 minutes on the route, and take way too much gear? ...these are very important to being a trad
+1


blueeyedclimber


Jul 11, 2011, 9:49 PM
Post #34 of 122 (5374 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
A Sincere thank you for the time and effort, many of the replies were incredibly helpful.

You're welcome!

In reply to:
Yesterday I led my first trad route!!! Onsighted a 5.2, Ya baby I'm hardcore Cool It was the easiest route (grade wise) I have ever climbed and it was also the scariest and most mentally challenging route I have ever climbedLaugh [/laugh]

Congratulations!

In reply to:
Blue Eyed, I found your post to be incredibly helpful and inspiring so a special thanks to you.

Again, you're welcome.

In reply to:
I'd love any advice anyone can offer for excercises to train myself to find good rest positions and comfy places to plug.

Finding rests to place gear is no different than finding rests while climbing. Learn to get creative, relax, breathe, be patient, and the rest(s) will come.


In reply to:
How long did it take people until they felt confident in being able to look at a crack and know within 1-2 pieces, what type and size pro should be placed. Is this even a goal worth striving towards?

This takes lots and lots of mileage. Also, learn to recognize your rack in relation to your own body parts. For example, for me solid fingers is yellow alien, good hands gold camalot, etc.

In reply to:
How long did it take people until they felt comfortable falling on their gear?

Well, to some extent, you should never be comfortable, but you should learn to evaluate each isolated situation. Sometimes the gear is good and the fall is clean, so go for it! Sometimes, you better not fall. Sometimes you may need to back off rather than risk a fall, other times you can work a move taking multiple falls. It all depends.

In reply to:
Just to confirm my thoughts on a matter: Just because an anchor built with gear holds the seconder doesn't mean those placements could hold a leader fall. This is becasue the anchor, if equalized will distribute the weight, and the force of the seconder on the pro is less than that of a fall by the leader. Does direction of pull play a factor too?

A leader fall directly on the anchor is the worst type of fall and should be avoided at all costs! But, with that said, you should strive for an anchor that will hold that type of fall. Always build the best anchor you can and as a leader you should protect early and often to avoid the factor 2 fall.

In reply to:
Again, sorry to be a nag, but I'm a N00B, thanks again for the advice and support. I love sport , but Trad is rad, its a game of chess with your life on the line, and where you hope your opponent never moves, a true act of humility and patience, and it offers a view!

Remember it's all climbing and if you truly want to be humble than don't think that one form is better than the other. But...if you learn to climb well on gear, than it opens up the possibility of climbing the best routes this country has to offer.

Good luck!

Josh


ecade


Jul 11, 2011, 9:53 PM
Post #35 of 122 (5373 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2011
Posts: 132

Re: [sbaclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Wore a helmet, always do feel more confident and I don't hit my head on overhanging rocks if moving too fast with not enough thought (the sport climber in me ;))

Took 10 minutes on route about 20 building anchor and belaying second and rappelling back down

Placed 8 pieces of pro and slung 2 trees route was about 40-50"

Mentor belayed me, used his rack, had every thing except big bros and the kitchen sink. Nuts, off set nuts, micro nut, bd cams, alien small cams, friends, 4 tricams and 5 hexes. 6 slings 8 qd, 4 non lockers for trad slings, webbing and cord for cordellete. It weighed a shit load!

Feedback please and thanks
Dankeshen


sbaclimber


Jul 11, 2011, 10:16 PM
Post #36 of 122 (5368 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
Wore a helmet, always do feel more confident and I don't hit my head on overhanging rocks if moving too fast with not enough thought (the sport climber in me ;))
Well.....not quite the reason I was thinking, but that works too.

ecade wrote:
Took 10 minutes on route about 20 building anchor and belaying second and rappelling back down
Whoa there, Nelly!!! Waaaaayyyy too fast. Hell, *true* trad climbers don't even climb fully bolted routes that fast. Definitely need to working on your "rest stances".

ecade wrote:
Placed 8 pieces of pro and slung 2 trees route was about 40-50"
Oh, now I see how you were so fast. That's about the right amount of pro for a route of that length, but if it had been 40-50', a *true* trad climber would've had to stop and build a belay mid-way to rest and get his second to retrieve the gear for the next pitch.


ecade wrote:
It weighed a shit load!
That's what we call weight training.


(This post was edited by sbaclimber on Jul 11, 2011, 10:17 PM)


Partner cracklover


Jul 11, 2011, 10:21 PM
Post #37 of 122 (5364 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'd love any advice anyone can offer for excercises to train myself to find good rest positions and comfy places to plug.

The very best way is to lead and place a ton of gear. Any other exercise will be significantly worse.

How long did it take people until they felt confident in being able to look at a crack and know within 1-2 pieces, what type and size pro should be placed. Is this even a goal worth striving towards?

Definitely worth striving for. Sorry, don't remember when I "arrived", but at least I can give you one tip: memorize the size of your cams in relation to how your body fits into cracks. For example, I know that for me a blue Alien is tight tips, green is tight fingers, yellow is perfect fingers, red/.5 camalot is rattly fingers, etc on up to fists. That way you know instantly what to reach for.

How long did it take people until they felt comfortable falling on their gear?

That's a tricky question. I'm not *always* comfortable falling. But I started being comfortable sometimes pushing into the zone where I knew I *might* fall if I had a bunch of good gear, my second season leading. But it wasn't until a full 3 1/2 years after I started leading that I took my first lead fall.

Just to confirm my thoughts on a matter: Just because an anchor built with gear holds the seconder doesn't mean those placements could hold a leader fall. This is becasue the anchor, if equalized will distribute the weight, and the force of the seconder on the pro is less than that of a fall by the leader. Does direction of pull play a factor too?

I'm not really sure what you're getting at, but yes, a leader taking a factor two fall onto the anchor puts more force on it than toproping.

GO


rescueman


Jul 12, 2011, 12:19 AM
Post #38 of 122 (5342 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 1, 2004
Posts: 439

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
Help Convert Me!

You're exactly right - it would require a conversion experience, because Trad climbing is a different religion.

The most dangerous trad climber is one who learned in a climbing gym. The second most dangerous trad climber is one who started on sport routes.

I was fortunate to go from top-roping to seconding to leading in about one year, and have led trad routes for 20 years without taking a leader fall. I didn't start climbing until I was 38 years old, and I've taught many others the joys of climbing.

Climbing traditionally, is not a contest of wills between the climber and the rock. It's a collaborative experience. For me, climbing is a meditation, an experience of practical problem-solving, and a form of dancing on rock (or with rock). It's more about balance and grace than strength, power or speed. It's an entirely different mindset and approach to life than anything called a "sport". It's a way of travel in which the going is better than the getting there.

Once you're in the right mindset for trad climbing, then get behind a good leader and second for as many different climbs as you can. Pay attention to their placements as you clean the route. Ask questions about protecting traverses and how to set up bomber belay anchors. Learn the importance of placing protection more often as you leave a belay station than as you get farther up on rope. Learn how to protect the difficult moves, and when to back off when the angel of your better judgement whispers sweet nothings in your ear.

The goal of trad climbing is to NOT fall, so practice that discipline. Don't feel you have to always push your limits in order to feel good about the climb. Learn how to be thrilled with making a really beautiful ascent rather than a really difficult one.

Be one with the rock and may the Force be with you.



ecade


Jul 12, 2011, 2:42 AM
Post #39 of 122 (5325 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 23, 2011
Posts: 132

Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Thanks again everyone for feedback,

Josh: didn't mean to insult sport climbing, I think all types of climbing are great, I know of no sport more personal than climbing, so I wholeheartedly agree, all types of climbing are great if not virtuous in their own right. But I've always been an explorer. I'm canadian but what are these routes you speak of in your country.

Rescueman, if you are right, than I need a lot more feedback and advice and SAFE practice. I learnt to climb indoors some 8 years ago, then started sport climbing and its great but there is much more trad out where I am and I spent years leading canoe trips staring at beautiful rock that I'd love to ascend. I am not looking at giving up Sport, I just want options. And i like being able to push myself physically in sport and push myself mentally in trad. Also, I think trad will very much help my sport climbing.

SBA Climber:
Please advise, if rope is ~150' (50m) why would you stop after 50' (~16m) and build a belay station? To replenish the rack? The route was most likely less than 50' probably 35-40', I have been trying to find route information but this site doesn't have it, and the book for ontario sport climbing is damn old.

I've never climbed a 5.2 before but I thought it was that grade because it had many placement options and had a lot of ledges. There weren't jugs more so nice size cracks. I was able to hand jam a crack and stand on great foot holds to make the majority of my placements, this allowed me to be relaxed while making placements.

Just because of belay partners and life, I only really get outdoors on the weekends, I try to do 2-3 gym sessions during the week. Are there no rest excersises I could do while in the gym?

Regarding the anchors part, ya that was poorly phrased on my part. What I meant was, hypothetically, a placement used for top rop anchor, just becuase the anchor held on the second belay, doesnt mean that if the leader placed, hypothetically, the exact same pro in the exact same size crack in the same integrity of rock, does not mean it would hold a leader fall. I ask as I want to know how to judge a placement to discern whether I could fall on it. Not that I want to fall, but its calming to know that if you should fall you aren't going to deck out. Perhaps this is not possible, but you can atleast ask, i'd prefer not to try.

Thanks again, I really appreciate the advice and feedback.


sbaclimber


Jul 12, 2011, 7:45 AM
Post #40 of 122 (5308 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 3118

Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

ecade wrote:
SBA Climber:
Please advise, if rope is ~150' (50m) why would you stop after 50' (~16m) and build a belay station? To replenish the rack? The route was most likely less than 50' probably 35-40', I have been trying to find route information but this site doesn't have it, and the book for ontario sport climbing is damn old.
In response to your bolded question, yes, to replenish the rack. I was just yanking your chain though.
Serious -> It sounds like you did just fine for your first time! Smile
I was only joking around a bit, because you made a typo (" = inches, ' = feet Tongue), and because I immediately thought of the this pic I took of one my old climbing partners just after he got his first rack of cams Laugh:



healyje


Jul 12, 2011, 8:57 AM
Post #41 of 122 (5302 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 4204

Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
Can't Post

rescueman wrote:
...and have led trad routes for 20 years without taking a leader fall.

I'm always a bit taken aback by statements like this...

rescueman wrote:
The goal of trad climbing is to NOT fall, so practice that discipline.

And to be honest I couldn't disagree more with this statement and absolutely would not counsel anyone to consider not falling a 'discipline'. It maybe a goal or 'discipline' in caving or in rescue - but certainly not in climbing, or at least not any concept of climbing I've ever held.

Now a beginner certainly shouldn't be pitching off routes and, in fact, you shouldn't be pushing it on gear until you are competent and have considerable experience under your belt. But never falling? I'd say that is where the "leader must not fall" tripe should have been rooted out and put down for good once nylon was invented.

I do agree with the "beautiful ascents" comment, but the 'goal' of [trad] climbing is to learn to evaluate, accept and manage risks, not avoid them.

You want to develop and hone your perception and management of risk, physical movement skills, and your technical protection skills as you develop. Keep at that and you'll arrive at a point where you can climb at your limit and sometimes beyond. You'll have successes, short and long falls, and even some epics - and that is what climbing is about, from my perspective anyway.


(This post was edited by healyje on Jul 12, 2011, 6:33 PM)


Partner cracklover


Jul 12, 2011, 3:36 PM
Post #42 of 122 (5272 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162

Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rescueman wrote:
The most dangerous trad climber is one who learned in a climbing gym.

Yeah right. You, sir, are an idiot.

GO


rescueman


Jul 12, 2011, 4:52 PM
Post #43 of 122 (5259 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 1, 2004
Posts: 439

Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

cracklover wrote:
rescueman wrote:
The most dangerous trad climber is one who learned in a climbing gym.

Yeah right. You, sir, are an idiot.

GO

Call me what you want, but that's a simple fact. The number of accidents on climbing crags increased with the increasing prevalence and popularity of indoor climbing gyms.

People were learning to climb in highly controlled environments, with no changing weather, no crumbling or flaking rock, no insects or reptiles or lichen, and no need to learn how to set up protection or an anchor or manage different belay situations. So it was easy to develop climbing skill quickly without having any of the necessary associated skills

Then they went to the crags, thinking they could simply do the same level of climbing on real rock in the real world.


rescueman


Jul 12, 2011, 5:00 PM
Post #44 of 122 (5255 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 1, 2004
Posts: 439

Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

healyje wrote:
rescueman wrote:
The goal of trad climbing is to NOT fall, so practice that discipline.

And to be honest I couldn't disagree more...

It maybe a goal or 'discipline' in caving or in rescue - but certainly not in climbing, or at least not any concept of climbing I've ever held.
It's the discipline I learned and nurtured from trad climbing long before I got involved in caving and rescue. And it's the discipline that has been central to alpine climbing since time immemorial.

Sport climbing, however, is a completely different beast. As a sport, the goal is to constantly test one's limits and try to exceed them.

Traditional climbing, like life itself, is a matter of learning to understand and live humbly within one's inherent limits - and to know when one is about to exceed them and then wisely back off.

In reply to:
But never falling? I'd say that is where the "leader must not fall" tripe should have been rooted out and put down for good once nylon was invented.

Call it "tripe" if you're unable to understand this spiritual discipline. But believing that we can exceed our natural limitations by "better" technology is exactly why the human race is on the brink of global collapse and possible extinction.

The ancient Greeks understood that all human tragedy is rooted in hubris.


sungam


Jul 12, 2011, 5:37 PM
Post #45 of 122 (5240 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804

Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
Can't Post

This is my first response to one of your posts, and it might be a little biased because I have already decided that I don't really like you.[Edit to add: okay, I have seen 1, but only 1, post of yours that I thought wat 'aight.]


Are you serious? You don't think that the switchover to nylon kernmantle ropes, the invention of nuts and cams or the use of modern belay devices reduces the seriousness of a trad fall?

Look, I'll give you the "no-fall" rule for MOST alpine routes, but you must be some bumbling 5.6 wallower who has never seen a clean fall if you think that "the leader must not fall" still holds for trad. Either that or you can't place gear for shit.

People take whippers all the time. I would be surprised if there wasn't someone who pushed the boat wayyy the fuck out 15 feet over a cam and whipped each day*.



*Two notes:
  • When I saty pushed the boat out, I am talking about the difficulty of the route. I am not implying that only a crazy muthafucka would run it out 15 feet.

  • I mean a person a day, I am not implying that there is some Bob "whipper" Thompson who hucks off at least once a day.



  • (This post was edited by sungam on Jul 12, 2011, 5:39 PM)


    Partner cracklover


    Jul 12, 2011, 5:44 PM
    Post #46 of 122 (5236 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 14, 2002
    Posts: 10162

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    cracklover wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    The most dangerous trad climber is one who learned in a climbing gym.

    Yeah right. You, sir, are an idiot.

    GO

    Call me what you want, but that's a simple fact. The number of accidents on climbing crags increased with the increasing prevalence and popularity of indoor climbing gyms.

    People were learning to climb in highly controlled environments, with no changing weather, no crumbling or flaking rock, no insects or reptiles or lichen, and no need to learn how to set up protection or an anchor or manage different belay situations. So it was easy to develop climbing skill quickly without having any of the necessary associated skills

    Then they went to the crags, thinking they could simply do the same level of climbing on real rock in the real world.

    Uh huh. If you were right, they would be pitching themselves off crags to their death every weekend.

    I could toprope 5.10 in the gym before I learned to lead. I knew that my physical skills were way ahead of my technical skills, so I worked very hard to learn the technical skills and gain the experience I needed to become a competent leader. I'd have to be an idiot not to.

    I can see how someone who is lacking intelligence or sound judgment himself could fail to understand that others might make better choices. In short, your conclusions speak more about you than they do about me.

    GO


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 5:54 PM
    Post #47 of 122 (5232 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [sungam] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
    Can't Post

    sungam wrote:
    Are you serious? You don't think that the switchover to nylon kernmantle ropes, the invention of nuts and cams or the use of modern belay devices reduces the seriousness of a trad fall?

    At least you're honest enough to admit to your bias.

    But you're not very good at reading comprehension. I didn't say that modern gear doesn't make it possible for people to turn traditional alpine climbing into just another sport to prove how macho they are (women included).

    The Yosemite Decimal System of grading climbing routes only went as high as 5.9 until the 60's, because that was considered the most difficult roped free climb that could be done without aid.

    Technology allowed more difficult climbs, just as technology allowed us to go to the moon and the bottom of the sea. But I don't think anyone would consider moonflights and deep sea dives to be "traditional".

    The differences in opinion and perspective here are because newer generations of climbers have turned "traditional" into "trad", which rhymes with "rad" and means something like "sport".


    JimTitt


    Jul 12, 2011, 6:35 PM
    Post #48 of 122 (5217 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 7, 2008
    Posts: 1002

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    Goog God, now that´s some inane drivel!


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 6:51 PM
    Post #49 of 122 (5213 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    cracklover wrote:
    I could toprope 5.10 in the gym before I learned to lead. I knew that my physical skills were way ahead of my technical skills, so I worked very hard to learn the technical skills and gain the experience I needed to become a competent leader. I'd have to be an idiot not to.

    I can see how someone who is lacking intelligence or sound judgment himself could fail to understand that others might make better choices. In short, your conclusions speak more about you than they do about me.

    Well good for you. But what you fail to understand is that most people in today's world are "lacking intelligence or sound judgment".

    As the saying goes, sound judgement comes from experience - and that means experience in the real world. Not in the virtual world of a climbing gym.

    My assessment about the increase in climbing accidents came from discussions with rescue rangers and climbing guides.

    But here are some US mountaineering accident statistics (which includes rock climbing):

    Not until the 1990s and 2000s did NY State join the western mountain states as the location of most mountaineering accidents. By age, most accidents occur in the 15-30 year age range. More accidents occur on the ascent than on descent (54% to 41%), contrary to popular myth, and 63% occur on rock rather than snow or ice. The largest percentage of injuries are fractures, and most significant contributing causes are climbing unroped (16.9%), exceeding abilities (15.1%) and no or inadequate protection (12%). And the overwhelmingly largest direct cause is "fall or slip on rock".

    And from one source on climbing accidents:

    "Lack of proper training is the leading cause of climbing accidents, followed by equipment failure or the lack of proper equipment maintenance. Many people simply drive to a climbing area and try their hand at it with little or nothing in the way of training and almost no equipment—and then they are surprised when they suffer an accident."

    "Accidents are also caused by simple overconfidence; climbers think they know more than they actually do and suddenly find themselves in a dangerous situation with no idea of what to do."

    "Carelessness is another cause of climbing accidents. Equipment must be maintained and checked (and re-checked) before each climb. Carelessness ties in with overconfidence many times. New climbers check and re-check knots and the set up of their belayer…but as climbers gain more experience and become too confident in their climbing abilities, these things tend to become less important – and that’s when accidents happen."




    (This post was edited by rescueman on Jul 12, 2011, 6:52 PM)


    healyje


    Jul 12, 2011, 7:16 PM
    Post #50 of 122 (5207 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    The goal of trad climbing is to NOT fall, so practice that discipline.
    And to be honest I couldn't disagree more...
    It's the discipline I learned and nurtured from trad climbing long before I got involved in caving and rescue. And it's the discipline that has been central to alpine climbing since time immemorial.

    Again, "the leader must not fall" it's a horribly unfortunate meme that somehow survived in rock climbing far past it's utility. And alpine climbing isn't rock [trad] climbing - it's alpine climbing. Not falling in rock climbing is a highly counterproductive and limiting anti-discipline as far as I'm concerned.

    rescueman wrote:
    Traditional climbing, like life itself, is a matter of learning to understand and live humbly within one's inherent limits - and to know when one is about to exceed them and then wisely back off.

    Again, I couldn't possibly or more fundamentally disagree with this statement. In fact, if that were what trad climbing was 'about', or a 'goal' of it, then I would have quit climbing decades ago.

    rescueman wrote:
    Call it "tripe" if you're unable to understand this spiritual discipline. But believing that we can exceed our natural limitations by "better" technology is exactly why the human race is on the brink of global collapse and possible extinction. The ancient Greeks understood that all human tragedy is rooted in hubris.

    And I would say that if you've been leading for twenty years and never taken a leader fall then you entirely lack the experience to speak objectively on the matter. And to be exceptionally clear, 'technology' has little to nothing about it. We were pushing and expanding our limits leading on goldline with nothing more than a set of hexs and nuts - and taking solid falls doing it the entire time.

    That is how one exceeds one's [current] limits - by learning progressively better physical, emotional, and risk management skills so that you can step out onto harder and harder challenges - often times challenges beyond your current limits. And when you do that, sometimes you fail - if you're pushing your limits a lot you fail and fall, but not always and you'll advance on those gains.

    Respond however you will, but I'm here to tell you you chose a exceptionally conservative path in your rock climbing and that has left you entirely bereft of the experience necessary to either state what the 'goal' of 'traditional' climbing is or to have a deep understanding that 'traditional' climbing has advanced by constantly 'surfing' challenges out beyond the edge of certainty and our current limits.

    You sum up your own lack of experience best with this quote:

    rescueman wrote:
    Sport climbing, however, is a completely different beast. As a sport, the goal is to constantly test one's limits and try to exceed them.

    Sport climbing simply stripped off the technical and emotional challenges leaving the the above-stated 'goal' which has always been at the heart of trad climbing. "Constantly testing one's limits and trying to exceed them" while placing highly technical pro and managing your fear is what has always defined the cutting edge of trad climbing and always will.

    I'm glad you found a repose with trad climbing that works for you, but given your choices I'd suggest refraining from attempting to project that experience as what trad climbing has been, is, or should be for others.


    (This post was edited by healyje on Jul 12, 2011, 8:02 PM)


    healyje


    Jul 12, 2011, 7:21 PM
    Post #51 of 122 (4655 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    "Accidents are also caused by simple overconfidence; climbers think they know more than they actually do and suddenly find themselves in a dangerous situation with no idea of what to do."

    Here you confuse incompetence and Darwinian selection for competence and quite mistakenly assume from that confusion that it's not possible to challenge your limits on trad gear. A very, very bad assumption indeed.

    P.S.:

    rescueman wrote:
    My assessment about the increase in climbing accidents came from discussions with rescue rangers and climbing guides.

    Rescue rangers and guides by themselves are in no way a remotely definitive source of opinions on that particular matter. If anything, I would say in today's demographics that guides and 'guiding' are part of the problem - not the solution; and SAR, outside of a couple of select locales such as Denali, Yosemite, and Longs Peak are seldom people I would consider as holding 'authoritative' opinions or judgments about any aspect of climbing.


    (This post was edited by healyje on Jul 12, 2011, 7:56 PM)


    Partner cracklover


    Jul 12, 2011, 8:35 PM
    Post #52 of 122 (4624 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 14, 2002
    Posts: 10162

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    cracklover wrote:
    I could toprope 5.10 in the gym before I learned to lead. I knew that my physical skills were way ahead of my technical skills, so I worked very hard to learn the technical skills and gain the experience I needed to become a competent leader. I'd have to be an idiot not to.

    I can see how someone who is lacking intelligence or sound judgment himself could fail to understand that others might make better choices. In short, your conclusions speak more about you than they do about me.

    Well good for you. But what you fail to understand is that most people in today's world are "lacking intelligence or sound judgment".

    That's just more projection. I know lots of solid trad climbers who started in the gym. Wanna know something? None of them - not one - has the mentality you talk of. If anything, they are more conservative than most folks who started outside (yourself excepted).

    They cut their teeth in an environment they know is safe and coddled, and perhaps that leads them to be overly conservative outside. Be that as it may, your repeated claims:

    rescueman wrote:
    cracklover wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    The most dangerous trad climber is one who learned in a climbing gym.

    Yeah right. You, sir, are an idiot.

    GO

    Call me what you want, but that's a simple fact.

    ... are nothing but bull, and the sooner you admit it and stop digging, the faster you can climb out of that hole.

    To the OP: Don't let this ass discourage you. The simple fact that you first climbed in a gym does not mean you cannot be a technically and physically solid and proficient trad climber.

    GO


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 8:38 PM
    Post #53 of 122 (4622 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    And I would say that if you've been leading for twenty years and never taken a leader fall then you entirely lack the experience to speak objectively on the matter.
    That's the same as saying that, if I've been driving for 20 years and have never had an accident, then I lack the experience necessary to speak objectively about driving.

    I think most people would say just the opposite.

    In reply to:
    That is how one exceeds one's [current] limits - by learning progressively better physical, emotional, and risk management skills
    Yes, that's the necessary task of adolescence - to test and constantly try to exceed one's limits. That's why adolescents are so accident-prone. And that's why, in all traditional societies, adolescent boys (at least) were led through highly ritualized rites of passage to give them a culturally-appropriate and safe way to test their limits.

    But the stage of life we call maturity is about, having learned where those limits are, living responsibly within them.

    Most people today in modern culture are in a state of arrested development, and those who engage in extreme sports are the most blatant examples.

    In reply to:
    I'm here to tell you you chose a exceptionally conservative path in your rock climbing

    Do you understand the meaning of "traditional". It's almost synonymous with "conservative".

    In reply to:
    Sport climbing simply stripped off the technical and emotional challenges leaving the the above-stated 'goal' which has always been at the heart of trad climbing. "Constantly testing one's limits and trying to exceed them" while placing highly technical pro and managing your fear is what has always defined the cutting edge of trad climbing and always will.

    We can't, in truth, "manage" our fear, since it's pre-conscious and stems from the reptile brain (basal ganglia). But the hero's journey and the warrior's creed has always been about confronting our fears and acting responsibly in spite of them.

    And I'm not the only one who thinks that what passes for "trad" climbing today is just another form of sport climbing. John Long's 1989 book How to Rock Climb used the term "sport climbing" repeatedly in reference to what is now considered "traditional climbing."

    In reply to:
    I'm glad you found a repose with trad climbing that works for you, but given your choices I'd suggest refraining from attempting to project that experience as what trad climbing has been, is, or should be for others.

    And I would offer you the same advice. Your perspective is no more legitimate, useful or worthy of teaching to others than mine - which is based on a lifetime of experience, and teaching and guiding of others - adolescent and adult - in both the physical and the spiritual realms.

    For climbing, at its best (as with any pursuit in life) is a spiritual endeavor.

    "The hardest thing in the world is to simplify your life. It's so easy to make it complex. What's important is leading an examined life, because most of the damage that's caused by humans is caused unintentionally. You can't just keep trying to make a flawed system work. Each of us, in our own way, gotta do something. Save your soul, you know. Whatever that is."
    – Yvon Choinard, revolutionary blacksmith, climber, environmentalist and founder of Black Diamond and Patagonia Clothing Company


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 8:47 PM
    Post #54 of 122 (4619 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    cracklover wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    most people in today's world are "lacking intelligence or sound judgment".

    That's just more projection. I know lots of solid trad climbers who started in the gym.

    Projection? Hardly. It's from nearly 60 years of living on earth as a close observer of human behavior.

    The fact that you know people who don't fit that category hardly makes my generalization from many people's experience in the field less accurate. Your mileage may differ, or perhaps you simply don't have the experience and judgement to judge other people's judgement.

    In reply to:
    To the OP: Don't let this ass discourage you. The simple fact that you first climbed in a gym does not mean you cannot be a technically and physically solid and proficient trad climber.
    Anyone who calls another names just because they disagree with their statements or because their own limited experience has led them to other conclusions has a lot of growing up to do.

    There is nothing whatsoever in any of my statements which are intended to discourage the OP from being "converted" (as he put it) to trad climbing. But they do offer a justified caveat about leaping before learning.


    sbaclimber


    Jul 12, 2011, 8:57 PM
    Post #55 of 122 (4613 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 3118

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    And I would say that if you've been leading for twenty years and never taken a leader fall then you entirely lack the experience to speak objectively on the matter.
    That's the same as saying that, if I've been driving for 20 years and have never had an accident, then I lack the experience necessary to speak objectively about driving.
    Well, if being able to speak "objectively" about something requires having at some point pushed yourself beyond the boundary of your own capabilities, sure, why not.


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 9:31 PM
    Post #56 of 122 (4605 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [sbaclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    sbaclimber wrote:
    Well, if being able to speak "objectively" about something requires having at some point pushed yourself beyond the boundary of your own capabilities, sure, why not.

    You're confusing objectivity with subjectivity.

    And your syllogism is false, because your premise - "being able to speak "objectively" about something requires having at some point pushed yourself beyond the boundary of your own capabilities" - is false.

    Being "objective" (and I'll also put that in quotes, because it's largely mythical) requires a careful study that excludes personal bias.


    healyje


    Jul 12, 2011, 9:52 PM
    Post #57 of 122 (4599 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    That's the same as saying that, if I've been driving for 20 years and have never had an accident...

    Bad analogy - a better analogy would be never going out surfing on a big day because you either always play it safe, you lack confidence in your abilities, or are afraid to confront the unknown. Another analogy would be a soldier who served stateside, and never saw battle, but is attempting to define for new recruits what 'soldiering' and it's 'goals' are all about.

    rescueman wrote:
    I think most people would say just the opposite.

    Maybe among the general population, but not among any of the people I've had the pleasure of climbing with over the past thirty seven years.

    rescueman wrote:
    But the stage of life we call maturity is about, having learned where those limits are, living responsibly within them.

    Here you confuse climbing with suburban life and career. That you've never risked in climbing in no way represents climbing responsibly or even living responsibly, but rather safely and timidly while making explicit trade offs that always err on the side of caution and 'safety'.

    rescueman wrote:
    Do you understand the meaning of "traditional". It's almost synonymous with "conservative".

    'Trad' is an unfortunate term which refers solely to what rock climbing was prior to the advent of sport climbing and has no explicit association with the conventional definitions of the words 'traditional' or 'conservative'.

    rescueman wrote:
    But the hero's journey and the warrior's creed has always been about confronting our fears and acting responsibly in spite of them.

    Not really into heros or warriors, but I can categorically state that definition is bullshit - particularly the "acting responsibly" part. 'Acting bravely' is how that should read - as in knowing it's time to rise to an uncertain challenge and committing to the unknown.

    rescueman wrote:
    John Long's 1989 book How to Rock Climb used the term "sport climbing" repeatedly in reference to what is now considered "traditional climbing."

    John is as good an knowledgeable guy as anyone and, though I haven't read his books, I suspect you are badly misinterpreting either his words or intent because I can assure you he knows the difference between the two.

    rescueman wrote:
    Your perspective is no more legitimate, useful or worthy of teaching to others than mine - which is based on a lifetime of experience, and teaching and guiding of others - adolescent and adult - in both the physical and the spiritual realms.

    Well, in this instance you'd be wrong. In fact, I - and any other experienced climbers with lots of experience putting up [trad] FAs and falling - have far deeper experience and insight into climbing than folks who have made the choices you have. Sorry, but there's simply no getting around it - again, it's like the difference between a soldier who's been in battle and one who hasn't.

    rescueman wrote:
    For climbing, at its best (as with any pursuit in life) is a spiritual endeavor.

    Another projection - maybe for some folks, not for others. Spirituality is a personal deal and folks may or may not find such a path in or through climbing. I personally have a hard time with vanilla spiritual 'teaching' and 'back-of-the-wheaties-box' attempts to display it.

    And, like John, Yvon is just another person and climber with his good sides, bad sides, and his own takes on the world and his personal journey through it. Again, not really into the hero / warrior / icon thing, but both men summoned what was required to bravely launch into uncertainty and the unknown again and again logging no shortage of flight time in the process.


    (This post was edited by healyje on Jul 12, 2011, 10:27 PM)


    sbaclimber


    Jul 12, 2011, 9:53 PM
    Post #58 of 122 (4598 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 3118

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    You're confusing objectivity with subjectivity.
    And your syllogism is false, because your premise - "being able to speak "objectively" about something requires having at some point pushed yourself beyond the boundary of your own capabilities" - is false.
    I'm not confusing anything, that's why it's in quotes.
    And it is not my premise. (note, I used the word IF)


    (This post was edited by sbaclimber on Jul 12, 2011, 9:54 PM)


    Partner cracklover


    Jul 12, 2011, 10:25 PM
    Post #59 of 122 (4587 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 14, 2002
    Posts: 10162

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    cracklover wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    most people in today's world are "lacking intelligence or sound judgment".

    That's just more projection. I know lots of solid trad climbers who started in the gym.

    Projection? Hardly. It's from nearly 60 years of living on earth as a close observer of human behavior.

    When it comes to not getting dead, most people are extremely good at it.

    Furthermore, whether a trad climber first climbed in a gym or not is most definitely not a good means of determining whether that person is lacking in judgment or self-preservation instincts.

    In reply to:
    In reply to:
    To the OP: Don't let this ass discourage you. The simple fact that you first climbed in a gym does not mean you cannot be a technically and physically solid and proficient trad climber.
    Anyone who calls another names just because they disagree with their statements or because their own limited experience has led them to other conclusions has a lot of growing up to do.

    I'm not calling you an ass because I disagree with you, but because you most certainly are discouraging, and disparaging, anyone who started out climbing in a gym. You categorically defined those people as the most unsafe trad climbers.

    Here's your statement one more time:
    In reply to:
    The most dangerous trad climber is one who learned in a climbing gym.

    BTW, if it's any consolation, I think the above is the one (and perhaps the only) area where you and HEALYJE agree!

    GO


    healyje


    Jul 12, 2011, 10:39 PM
    Post #60 of 122 (4582 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    cracklover wrote:
    BTW, if it's any consolation, I think the above is the one (and perhaps the only) area where you and HEALYJE agree!

    Not exactly. Starting in a gym isn't the problem per se, but rather the lack of understanding that the 'hang, hang, hang, send' cycle inherent in gym and sport is not what climbing 'is' anymore than simply climbing on gear is what trad climbing 'is'. Dogging your way up a route with gear isn't trad climbing. It's simply sport climbing on gear and a discussion around that can be found elsewhere on RC.

    Another problem with gyms and [single-pitch] sport climbing is folks physical skills get way out ahead of their technical skills and knowing how to operate at height and around edges. This gets no end of folks in trouble and accidents.

    The last issue with gyms and sport climbing is over time they have cultivated 'climbing' as a group social / entertainment activity. This, in combination with the domination of grigris as the device of choice for allowing climbers to hang on routes, has led to a widespread under appreciation, if not the outright death of, the 'craft' of belaying. Belaying and the inability to STFUAB is now a, if not the, principal Darwinian mechanism in climbing today.


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 10:52 PM
    Post #61 of 122 (4579 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    That's the same as saying that, if I've been driving for 20 years and have never had an accident...

    Bad analogy - a better analogy would be never going out surfing on a big day because you either always play it safe, you lack confidence in your abilities, or are afraid to confront the unknown.

    Actually, it was a near-perfect analogy. There are many drivers (mostly male teenagers) who consider it a way to test their limits - and that is why they get into more accidents (leader falls) than any other demographic. But the shear fact that they've pushed their limits and get into a lot of accidents makes them less able to speak objectively about the art of driving - and make them the worst teachers of driving.

    Your surfing analogy is completely irrelevant (or rather a straw man argument), because you're describing - not a master surfer who always performs at the height of his ability without ever transgressing it - but rather a timid surfer who is uncertain of his abilities and is afraid to confront his fear.

    In reply to:
    Another analogy would be a soldier who served stateside, and never saw battle, but is attempting to define for new recruits what 'soldiering' and it's 'goals' are all about
    Another irrelevant, or straw man, argument. The proper analogy would be the soldier who has served for 20 years, including in positions of leadership and training, and who has confronted many enemies without suffering wounds. That is not only the master soldier, but the one who should be teaching new recruits - not the old sargeant with all the scars.

    In reply to:
    rescueman wrote:
    I think most people would say just the opposite.

    Maybe among the general population...
    Yes, among the general population, most people would not listen to an accident-prone driver who was always pushing his limits, for an objective perspective on driving.

    In reply to:
    rescueman wrote:
    But the stage of life we call maturity is about, having learned where those limits are, living responsibly within them.

    Here you confuse climbing with suburban life and career. That you've never risked in climbing in no way represents climbing responsibly or even living responsibly, but rather safely and timidly while making explicit trade offs that always err on the side of caution and 'safety'.
    No, rather here you're confusing a lifetime of taking reasonable risks (and going far beyond what ordinary mortals do), with either never having risked or living "safely and timidly".

    And you're confusing living at, but not over, the edge as a bias toward caution. Living at the edge is a fine ballet with fate. Pushing constantly beyond that edge is the fools tango with death.

    And, again, it's typical of the adolescent stage of psycho-social development.

    In reply to:
    'Trad' is an unfortunate term
    Clearly, it is for you, since it doesn't comport with what you believe traditional climbing to be.

    In reply to:
    rescueman wrote:
    But the hero's journey and the warrior's creed has always been about confronting our fears and acting responsibly in spite of them.

    Not really into heros or warriors, but I can categorically state that definition is bullshit - particularly the "acting responsibly" part. 'Acting bravely' is how that should read - as in knowing it's time to rise to an uncertain challenge and committing to the unknown.
    Clearly you know nothing at all about the ancient cross-cultural warrior traditions, or the universal archetypal hero's journey from undisciplined youth to mature adulthood. You are the archetypical perennial adolescent, who calls "bullshit" to anything he can't comprehend.

    In reply to:
    Spirituality is a personal deal and folks may or may not find such a path in or through climbing.
    On the contrary, the spiritual journey (the same as the hero's journey) is the most universal experience of being human since we first evolved self-reflective brains.


    healyje


    Jul 12, 2011, 11:19 PM
    Post #62 of 122 (4568 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    Another analogy would be a soldier who served stateside, and never saw battle, but is attempting to define for new recruits what 'soldiering' and it's 'goals' are all about.
    Another irrelevant, or straw man, argument. The proper analogy would be the soldier who has served for 20 years, including in positions of leadership and training, and who has confronted many enemies without suffering wounds. That is not only the master soldier, but the one who should be teaching new recruits - not the old sargeant with all the scars.

    Entirely wrong and, in the context of climbing, you are not either of those men.

    Again, I'm sure your notions of climbing and spirituality work for you - but your whole spiel here is a non-starter relative to climbing at a high level of confidence, competence, and accomplishment.

    This may be a result of you entering climbing at as a risk-averse middle aged man, or maybe climbing just isn't a venue you feel comfortable managing risk in - I can't say which, but leading for twenty years without falling says it all relative to your qualifications to pontificate about what climbing is or should be about.


    rescueman


    Jul 12, 2011, 11:39 PM
    Post #63 of 122 (4555 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    Entirely wrong and, in the context of climbing, you are not either of those men.
    You are free to disagree, but you have not demonstrated the standing (other than simple years in the trenches) to judge my perspective "wrong". In fact, quite the contrary.

    In reply to:
    Again, I'm sure your notions of climbing and spirituality work for you - but your whole spiel here is a non-starter relative to climbing at a high level of confidence, competence, and accomplishment.
    You're entirely mistaken - since my climbing has always been at a "high level of confidence, competence, and accomplishment", and more than sufficient to introduce hundreds of others to the art as an experiential educator, adventure program leader and wilderness guide - but that's because you have a distorted notion of "accomplishment" which is based on how many mistakes you've survived and how high a 5.x number you can tuck into your hat.

    In reply to:
    This may be a result of you entering climbing at as a risk-averse middle aged man, or maybe climbing just isn't a venue you feel comfortable managing risk in - I can't say which, but leading for twenty years without falling says it all relative to your qualifications to pontificate about what climbing is or should be about.
    If you think that 38 is "middle-aged" then you must be younger than I imagined (I'm just now entering middle age as I approach 60 - at 38 I was at the peak of my physical abilities). I began climbing when I was trained for an entirely new vocation - outdoor leadership - and, while risk management is part of the curriculum, no one changes careers who is "risk-averse".

    It's more than ironic for you to suggest that "climbing just isn't a venue you feel comfortable managing risk in" since, demonstrably, I've managed risk far better than you.

    And, given that I have not only a deep understanding of the art of traditional climbing but also a deeper understanding of the art of living than you, I suspect that I'm in a far better position to "pontificate" about the subject and to offer perspectives which will help make climbing into a part of life's journey rather than a mere sport.


    healyje


    Jul 12, 2011, 11:59 PM
    Post #64 of 122 (4550 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    You are free to disagree, but you have not demonstrated the standing (other than simple years in the trenches) to judge my perspective "wrong".

    I don't need to demonstrate anything, my climbs speak for themselves.

    rescueman wrote:
    You're entirely mistaken - since my climbing has always been at a "high level of confidence, competence, and accomplishment"

    Not if you've never taken a lead fall in twenty years. What that says is you've simply played it safe for all those years. Sorry, it's simply not possible for anyone to lead at a subjective or objective high level and not fall.

    rescueman wrote:
    ...and more than sufficient to introduce hundreds of others to the art as an experiential educator, adventure program leader and wilderness guide - but that's because you have a distorted notion of "accomplishment" which is based on how many mistakes you've survived and how high a 5.x number you can tuck into your hat.
    ...
    I began climbing when I was trained for an entirely new vocation - outdoor leadership - and, while risk management is part of the curriculum, no one changes careers who is "risk-averse".

    I find myself summarily if not overwhelmingly unimpressed by the notions of "outdoor" and "adventure program" leadership in the context of rock climbing where, beyond some novel social cache, they mean absolutely nothing.

    rescueman wrote:
    And, given that I have not only a deep understanding of the art of traditional climbing but also a deeper understanding of the art of living than you, I suspect that I'm in a far better position to "pontificate" about the subject and to offer perspectives which will help make climbing into a part of life's journey rather than a mere sport.

    Well, you don't know anything about me and my life to make any judgment around me and the "art of living." And, yet again, twenty years of leading without falling means you at best possess a limited understanding of what [trad] climbing is all about.

    I know that must be hard for a natural born and artful-living leader such as yourself to hear, but there's just no getting around that reality.


    rescueman


    Jul 13, 2011, 12:12 AM
    Post #65 of 122 (4542 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    Well, you don't know anything about me and my life to make any judgment around me
    But that doesn't seem to stop you from making all kinds of irrational and absurd (and typically straw man) judgements about me. Do you not notice the hypocrisy?

    In reply to:
    twenty years of leading without falling means you at best possess a limited understanding of what [trad] climbing is all about.
    It's true that there's a certain nobility in picking yourself up after repeated failure to try and try again, but there is a necessary obsessiveness required to continue banging your head against the same wall in spite of the pain.

    In reply to:
    "there's just no getting around that reality."


    healyje


    Jul 13, 2011, 12:19 AM
    Post #66 of 122 (4539 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    Well, you don't know anything about me and my life to make any judgment around me
    But that doesn't seem to stop you from making all kinds of irrational and absurd (and typically straw man) judgements about me. Do you not notice the hypocrisy?

    In reality I'm not making any judgments about you specifically but trying get across that anyone with your limited experience in leading isn't in a position to define what [trad] climbing 'is' or what its 'goals' should be.

    rescueman wrote:
    In reply to:
    twenty years of leading without falling means you at best possess a limited understanding of what [trad] climbing is all about.

    It's true that there's a certain nobility in picking yourself up after repeated failure to try and try again, but there is a necessary obsessiveness required to continue banging your head against the same wall in spite of the pain.

    And once again you display a complete misunderstanding and confusion about what [trad] climbing is all about and unfortunately I don't suspect you're going to grasp it if you haven't by now.


    rescueman


    Jul 13, 2011, 12:30 AM
    Post #67 of 122 (4534 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    Clearly, you believe yourself to be the master of trad climbing, and everyone whose perspective differs from or contradicts yours is wrong.

    It's like arguing with a Jehovah's Witness.


    healyje


    Jul 13, 2011, 1:41 AM
    Post #68 of 122 (4523 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    Clearly, you believe yourself to be the master of trad climbing...

    Well, in this case - comparatively - yes, but I also don't personally know any accomplished trad climbers who are likely to agree with your beliefs and perceptions around [trad] climbing.


    jacques


    Jul 13, 2011, 2:46 AM
    Post #69 of 122 (4507 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    And I would say that if you've been leading for twenty years and never taken a leader fall then you entirely lack the experience to speak objectively on the matter.
    That's the same as saying that, if I've been driving for 20 years and have never had an accident, then I lack the experience necessary to speak objectively about driving.

    I think that I know who you were rescuman, I am on your side for some point. I also think that we most avoid the leader fall. Not for the reason mentioned by the other, more sport climber. as a trad climber, I plan my trip to have a full day on one or two route, like at canon. The game I play is like a chess game. I have to plan decide, go to see, decide, make the move and go to the top without falling. if I made it, I win, If I fall, the mountain win. when you play chess, there is always a winner, but you are not enemy for other reason.

    In sport, the goal is to make the hardiest move, and, more often, a move that the other can not do. There is no too much planning. You take your shoes a rope and go for any think, but climbing.

    Both are good, but I think like rescueman that trad climbing most avoid falling to play the game.


    jt512


    Jul 13, 2011, 3:07 AM
    Post #70 of 122 (4500 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Apr 12, 2001
    Posts: 21904

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    The goal of trad climbing is to NOT fall, so practice that discipline.

    And to be honest I couldn't disagree more...

    It maybe a goal or 'discipline' in caving or in rescue - but certainly not in climbing, or at least not any concept of climbing I've ever held.
    It's the discipline I learned and nurtured from trad climbing long before I got involved in caving and rescue. And it's the discipline that has been central to alpine climbing since time immemorial.

    Sport climbing, however, is a completely different beast. As a sport, the goal is to constantly test one's limits and try to exceed them.

    Traditional climbing, like life itself, is a matter of learning to understand and live humbly within one's inherent limits - and to know when one is about to exceed them and then wisely back off.

    In reply to:
    But never falling? I'd say that is where the "leader must not fall" tripe should have been rooted out and put down for good once nylon was invented.

    Call it "tripe" if you're unable to understand this spiritual discipline. But believing that we can exceed our natural limitations by "better" technology is exactly why the human race is on the brink of global collapse and possible extinction.

    OMG! I haven't read the whole thread, but just in case this last comment hasn't been QFPed, it is now.

    Jay


    (This post was edited by jt512 on Jul 13, 2011, 3:09 AM)


    healyje


    Jul 13, 2011, 3:50 AM
    Post #71 of 122 (4484 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [jacques] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    jacques wrote:
    In sport, the goal is to make the hardiest move, and, more often, a move that the other can not do.

    Hmmm, to be honest I think you and rescueman in a way are both casualties of the original split between climbing and sport climbing.

    Somehow some folks like you think a King Solomon somehow actually did split the baby and one half became the province of hard climbing and falling and the other became the province of easy moves and no falling.

    That's a pretty serious and somewhat sad misperception of reality from where I sit and nothing could be further from the truth. Hard trad climbing rife with falling and putting up hard (and yes, scary and even dangerous) FAs has never stopped within [trad] climbing - ever.

    jacques wrote:
    Both are good, but I think like rescueman that trad climbing most avoid falling to play the game.

    I hear that, but again you both badly misperceive and misunderstand what [trad] climbing is all about. And while it may be true in today's demographic that many or most folks climb trad far below their limit and don't fall much, the same thing can't be said of anyone who is serious about it.


    Bag11s


    Jul 13, 2011, 3:53 AM
    Post #72 of 122 (4482 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 8, 2009
    Posts: 98

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
    Can't Post

    Well, this confab has been very entertaining- especially for the OP I imagine. I pretty much have to side with maestro healyje all the way. Falling is just part of hard leading.


    rescueman


    Jul 13, 2011, 4:19 AM
    Post #73 of 122 (4471 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Mar 1, 2004
    Posts: 439

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    I hear that, but again you both badly misperceive and misunderstand what [trad] climbing is all about. And while it may be true in today's demographic that many or most folks climb trad far below their limit and don't fall much, the same thing can't be said of anyone who is serious about it.

    Ahhhh... so being "serious" means falling a lot. You must be a pretty serious guy.

    It seems to me that the most accomplished artists in all fields are the ones who can achieve perfection of motion without stumbling.


    healyje


    Jul 13, 2011, 4:56 AM
    Post #74 of 122 (4465 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    It seems to me that the most accomplished artists in all fields are the ones who can achieve perfection of motion without stumbling.

    Yep, that's how all the best surfers got good; twenty years of surfing without falling...


    sbaclimber


    Jul 13, 2011, 9:39 AM
    Post #75 of 122 (4436 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 3118

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    It seems to me that the most accomplished artists in all fields are the ones who can achieve perfection of motion without stumbling.
    Okay.....name one!

    PS, I was sort of willing to give you the benefit of the doubt only relative to your own definition of 'trad', but now you have just dug the hole too deep.
    "Perfection" can only be achieved through failure.


    (This post was edited by sbaclimber on Jul 13, 2011, 9:44 AM)


    jacques


    Jul 13, 2011, 12:05 PM
    Post #76 of 122 (5984 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [Bag11s] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    Bag11s wrote:
    Well, this confab has been very entertaining- especially for the OP I imagine. I pretty much have to side with maestro healyje all the way. Falling is just part of hard leading.

    I agree that falling is part of the game and I train to fall. I did three birtches sunday and it was a little bit wet. When you climb a diedral like that, you can put all your weight on your hand, and you will fall bump first or you can put all on your feet and your feet will hit the ground first (better). So, I was close to the middle (as much weight on my feet and on my hand) with a little more on my feet to have a clean fall...I didnt felt.

    It is true that I practice to do that, on top rope or in a bolt lader in a gym or outside, but I really push my limit when I went on a new climb and I do it without any fall. If I fall, I return training.,,and I don't say that I am a 5.11 climber because I make the move after tons of fall. But it is trad climbing and the ethic is different.


    Partner cracklover


    Jul 13, 2011, 3:35 PM
    Post #77 of 122 (5969 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 14, 2002
    Posts: 10162

    Re: [jacques] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    jacques wrote:
    Bag11s wrote:
    Well, this confab has been very entertaining- especially for the OP I imagine. I pretty much have to side with maestro healyje all the way. Falling is just part of hard leading.

    I agree that falling is part of the game and I train to fall. I did three birtches sunday and it was a little bit wet. When you climb a diedral like that, you can put all your weight on your hand, and you will fall bump first or you can put all on your feet and your feet will hit the ground first (better). So, I was close to the middle (as much weight on my feet and on my hand) with a little more on my feet to have a clean fall...I didnt felt.

    It is true that I practice to do that, on top rope or in a bolt lader in a gym or outside, but I really push my limit when I went on a new climb and I do it without any fall. If I fall, I return training.,,and I don't say that I am a 5.11 climber because I make the move after tons of fall. But it is trad climbing and the ethic is different.

    If you can do 3 Birches when it's wet and not fall, you have the strength and technique to climb much harder. Why not get on Airation? I promise you're strong enough. You might not get it clean your first try, but you have the potential to do so. The gear is good and plentiful, and the falls are safe. And it's excellent climbing - much better than 3 Birches. The only thing keeping you from challenging yourself on such a nice climb is your silly notion that you must never fall.

    Give yourself a real challenge. You just might like it.

    Cheers,

    GO


    jacques


    Jul 13, 2011, 10:35 PM
    Post #78 of 122 (5941 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    cracklover wrote:
    If you can do 3 Birches when it's wet and not fall, you have the strength and technique to climb much harder. Why not get on Airation? I promise you're strong enough. You might not get it clean your first try, but you have the potential to do so. The gear is good and plentiful, and the falls are safe. And it's excellent climbing - much better than 3 Birches. The only thing keeping you from challenging yourself on such a nice climb is your silly notion that you must never fall.


    And you are right. I looked at it last week end. My finger move, and my stomach contract a little. I am ready for it. I also looked at the one on the left... and children crusade the upper part. I still have thinks to climb. Looking for a partner for that, three try and leave it there if I can not for the next time.

    If I do it without fall, ooooh baby!!! I will be proud


    superchuffer


    Jul 16, 2011, 2:53 AM
    Post #79 of 122 (5911 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 294

    Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    falling isn't climbing.


    jt512


    Jul 16, 2011, 5:48 AM
    Post #80 of 122 (5905 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Apr 12, 2001
    Posts: 21904

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (3 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    It seems to me that the most accomplished artists in all fields are the ones who can achieve perfection of motion without stumbling.

    Yep, that's how all the best surfers got good; twenty years of surfing without falling...

    Best post ever.


    superchuffer


    Jul 16, 2011, 4:07 PM
    Post #81 of 122 (5885 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 294

    Re: [superchuffer] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
    Can't Post

    pretty sweet chuffer on chuffer discussion/argument here, discussing the finer nuances of how to best to rule the 5.9 trad crag in old man style.


    healyje


    Jul 17, 2011, 7:25 AM
    Post #82 of 122 (5856 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [superchuffer] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    superchuffer wrote:
    pretty sweet chuffer on chuffer discussion/argument here, discussing the finer nuances of how to best to rule the 5.9 trad crag in old man style.

    You're welcome to chuff on my old man routes anytime you like. And what the hell, I like a good show as much as the next guy so I'll even belay.


    superchuffer


    Jul 17, 2011, 2:35 PM
    Post #83 of 122 (5839 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 294

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    pretty sweet chuffer on chuffer discussion/argument here, discussing the finer nuances of how to best to rule the 5.9 trad crag in old man style.

    You're welcome to chuff on my old man routes anytime you like. And what the hell, I like a good show as much as the next guy so I'll even belay.

    ass-friction belay?! sweet!


    jt512


    Jul 17, 2011, 7:18 PM
    Post #84 of 122 (5824 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Apr 12, 2001
    Posts: 21904

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (1 rating)  
    Can't Post

    healyje wrote:
    superchuffer wrote:
    pretty sweet chuffer on chuffer discussion/argument here, discussing the finer nuances of how to best to rule the 5.9 trad crag in old man style.

    You're welcome to chuff on my old man routes anytime you like. And what the hell, I like a good show as much as the next guy so I'll even belay.

    With a belay device?

    Jay


    healyje


    Jul 17, 2011, 9:02 PM
    Post #85 of 122 (5812 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 4204

    Re: [jt512] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    jt512 wrote:
    With a belay device?

    Jay

    A non-locking carabiner.


    superchuffer


    Jul 19, 2011, 6:17 PM
    Post #86 of 122 (5761 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 294

    Re: [healyje] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    With a belay device?

    Jay

    A non-locking carabiner.

    don't like me enough to use a locker?

    to the OP, are you converted yet?


    ecade


    Aug 3, 2011, 7:28 PM
    Post #87 of 122 (5632 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 23, 2011
    Posts: 132

    Re: [superchuffer] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    Wow ....
    I greatly appreciate much of the advice, I wish it could have been done without the personal attacks that ensued as I feel it limited the amount of responses and insights that could have been received, and at present the argument is not too pertinent to me as I am not climbing routes that I even think for a second i'd fall on.

    I have purchased a rack and have scratched her up a bit.

    I am in the no fall stage, but i'd not climb trad under the auspicity of "never fall". Otherwise, why would I spend a boat load of cash on gear to protect me. But eh, climbing is personal, its your life on the line so you make your own choices and, (hope to) live with them.

    I'd greatly appreciate more advice, if there are books worth reading (i've read just about everything by long), websites worth checking, persons who are generous with their time to answer questions please do not hesitate to private message me

    Safe and Happy Climbing to All.


    superchuffer


    Aug 10, 2011, 9:46 PM
    Post #88 of 122 (5596 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 294

    Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    always wear a helmet.


    ladyscarlett


    Aug 13, 2011, 12:18 AM
    Post #89 of 122 (5572 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Dec 17, 2008
    Posts: 376

    Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    How to become a trad convert...

    acquire a rack you can fondle and play with as roughly (or gently) as you want any time you want. - check

    note - bigger isn't always better, but it IS more to fondle!

    Find people you don't mind fondling and playing roughly (or gently) with your rack. - check - assumed based on previous posts.

    Go get high with those people (generally with some fine crack for the day) and play with your rack (big or small) for as long as it keeps giving you that thrilling pleasure feeling. - check

    you've got a rack. I'd say you're converted.

    If that's not the case, drop me a line when you want don't want that rack anymore. heh!

    now being a safe trad convert...well I dunno, out of my territory now....

    good luck!

    cheers

    LS


    billcoe_


    Aug 13, 2011, 3:45 AM
    Post #90 of 122 (5560 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 30, 2002
    Posts: 4694

    Re: [ladyscarlett] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ladyscarlett wrote:
    How to become a trad convert...

    acquire a rack you can fondle and play with as roughly (or gently) as you want any time you want. - check

    note - bigger isn't always better, but it IS more to fondle!

    Find people you don't mind fondling and playing roughly (or gently) with your rack. - check - assumed based on previous posts.

    Go get high with those people (generally with some fine crack for the day) and play with your rack (big or small) for as long as it keeps giving you that thrilling pleasure feeling. - check

    you've got a rack. I'd say you're converted.

    If that's not the case, drop me a line when you want don't want that rack anymore. heh!

    now being a safe trad convert...well I dunno, out of my territory now....

    good luck!

    cheers

    LS


    That is sooooooo hot! Woot!


    Partner cracklover


    Aug 13, 2011, 3:32 PM
    Post #91 of 122 (5542 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 14, 2002
    Posts: 10162

    Re: [ladyscarlett] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ladyscarlett wrote:
    How to become a trad convert...

    acquire a rack you can fondle and play with as roughly (or gently) as you want any time you want. - check

    note - bigger isn't always better, but it IS more to fondle!

    Find people you don't mind fondling and playing roughly (or gently) with your rack. - check - assumed based on previous posts.

    Go get high with those people (generally with some fine crack for the day) and play with your rack (big or small) for as long as it keeps giving you that thrilling pleasure feeling. - check

    you've got a rack. I'd say you're converted.

    If that's not the case, drop me a line when you want don't want that rack anymore. heh!

    now being a safe trad convert...well I dunno, out of my territory now....

    good luck!

    cheers

    LS

    I dunno. I saw someone at a concert the other night. "She" looked like "she" was smuggling large grapefruits. But as for whether "she" was really converted? Maybe, maybe not. I didn't want to check.

    Point being - just having the rack is not conclusive evidence.

    GO


    Partner rgold


    Aug 13, 2011, 8:31 PM
    Post #92 of 122 (5524 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Dec 3, 2002
    Posts: 1804

    Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (2 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    Here's some advice I've posted at different times, I hope not incoherently cobbled together.

    The most important principle for using trad protection, especially but not exclusively if you are just learning, is redundancy. The idea is to develop a system you trust while maintaining a healthy scepticism about the reliability of any one piece. Try not to put yourself in the position of having a single piece, no matter how "bombproof," between you and disaster.

    Redundancy is a state of mind combined with the will to carry it out. Placing more than gear than seems to be essential requires discipline and endurance, marks of a good trad climber. Failing on a system is a better longevity option than betting the farm on a single piece.

    Nonetheless, all climbing to some extent, but trad climbing intrinsically, involves risk. A lot of climbs have places you better not fall from, and this is part of the essence of trad climbing---performing in a cool and controlled manner when confronting a risky situation. Neutralizing danger, not just by protection skills, but also by climbing skills, is part of the game.

    Although leader falls are an intrinsic part of modern trad climbing once you get to the higher classical levels, which start around 5.9, people who are in the process of learning protection shouldn't be falling. You will hear, "if the gear is bomber, go for it," which is fair enough, but such pronouncements avoid the real problem by defining it out of existence. Some accidents happen when the bomber gear turns out not to be bomber. The climber (1) misjudged the pro (something that is quite possible for experts, let alone beginners) or misjudged the effect that rope motions would have on the pro, (2) failed to build sufficient redundancy into the system, and then (3) misjudged their ability and went for it in a situation when they were not well protected.

    As for judging pro, experienced evaluation of your placements has value, but in addition to that I think top-roped aid climbing practice, with vigorous bounce-testing of every piece., is one of the best things you can do.

    More and more people seem to be learning by placing pieces and getting feedback from "experienced" climbers about their placements. In some cases, the "experienced" climbers learned the same way. Such advice can be very valuable, no doubt, but it is also possible that the learner is part of a chain of people who have never fortified their own "judgement" with some kind of testing. A person without extensive aid climbing experience who has climbed for a long time and never taken any leader falls themselves cannot offer expert advice on and/or evaluation of gear.

    But even genuinely experienced climbers can be wrong in their estimates 5% of the time. There is no substitute for placing, judging, and then testing yourself.

    If you can place pieces near bolts on sport climbs and then fall on those placements with the bolt for back-up protection, that seems like a good idea. You'd need sport climbs that have sufficient placements. Make sure that you aren't putting in gear whose failure might alter or erase holds, however, and practice when you aren't going to be in the way of others,

    For most people, top-rope aid practice is going to be the only available option. There are some other advantages to top-rope aiding.

    (1) Perhaps the main advantage is that you will learn something about how to aid. This is an essential skill for getting out of jams (route too hard, off route, unexpected wetness, onset of bad weather, approaching darkness, injured partner, etc. etc.).

    (BITD when big-wall climbing was the ultimate goal, folks learned free and aid climbing simultaneously. Now there are lots of trad climbers, some who are otherwise quite accomplished, who couldn't aid their way out of a paper bag.)

    (2) Aid climbing will inevitably force you to get creative with some placements, because the available terrain just above your current stance may not be optimal. This will be good practice for analogous trad climbing situations.

    (3) After finishing the pitch, you rap down with an experienced person and clean it. The experienced person should comment, not only on the placement itself, but also on whether there are better options nearby, something that beginners frequently miss, in my experience.

    Then you get to clean the pieces you placed and learn whether your placements lend themselves to cleaning, which is also critical for multipitch cimbs in general as well as for your wallet in particular. This may provide an opportunity for the experienced person to demonstrate some of the tricks of the trade when it comes to extracting recalcitrant gear.

    An important caveat about bounce-testing your placements: look at the placement carefully before you test it, but make sure to look away while testing it. If the piece blows, you don't want it to hit you in the face.

    Having said something about learning to get good protection, it is time to affirm again that part of trad climbing involves climbing without falling when falling is a bad idea. (For example, if there is one piece between you and the ground and you can't back it up, then falling is a bad idea.) Here I think modern trends can inculcate bad habits. Gym climbing, sport climbing, and bouldering all emphasize moving up in the most marginal of situations. There is a risk of developing an "upward" mentality that, first of all, accepts marginal moves even though the consequences of failure are catastrophic, perhaps not even noticing that the climber has gone from control to high risk status, and second of all, that takes upward motion as the only solution to a difficult situation, blinding the climber to both the need and the opportunity to climb down to rest, regroup, and yes, in some cases, to retreat.

    Mental discipline is the primary tool for avoiding the stress-induced upward stampede, but this discipline is not something acquired in the gym or on sport climbs, where it is counterproductive, and so retraining may be called for. Here are some exercises that may be of some use:

    (1) When climbing in the gym or on sport routes, try to be conscious of how marginal you are. (This does not mean reducing the difficulty level, just striving for heightened awareness.) From a trad perspective, a calculated fall may be ok, but an unexpected fall is not good. Strive to know when you are on the edge.

    (2) A lot of falls on steep ground happen when the leader runs out of gas. Try to develop a sense of your "half-way point," because this is one of the moments when you have to decide whether to move up away from your gear into a realm of longer and longer falls, or down towards your gear and the possibility of shorter falls. For example, a gym exercise is to select a challenging endurance route and then see how high on it you can get and still climb all the way back down without falling.

    (3) Develop the mental habit of filing away "retreat data." This can make the difference between stepping down and falling. (For example, when you step over a small roof, the holds underneath disappear. Did you make a mental note of features above the roof that will help you locate the holds underneath?)

    (4) Don't neglect the building of a base of climbing below your limit, climbing in which you are relatively comfortable but are also frequently in the "must not fall" zone. A steady diet of well-protected hard climbing at or near your limit, while essential for raising your climbing level, may shortchange you on control and calmness when things get dicey, as they will, sooner or later.

    One of the things the trad leader has to learn is rope management. Where the rope goes and what to do about it is decided for you on bolted routes, but when you are placing the gear, it is up to you to make placement choices and slinging choices that keep the rope running as you advance. Even experienced climbers find that they have made bad choices about gear location or slingage. But one of the differences is that the experienced climber will often climb back down and fix what was wrong, while the inexperienced climber will push on, finding later on that they can barely move because of rope drag.

    I think one of the most common errors experienced people make is placing nuts that zipper---meaning that the rope motions that occur during a fall lift the nuts out. (By the way, if you haven't taken leader falls, then you won't in general even know, except theoretically, what situations are critical in this regard). One thing to be careful about is to either have the belayer right up against the wall, or else place a first piece that is fully stable under an upward load. (I often hear people say a cam in a vertical crack satisfies this condition because it will just rotate upwards without pulling, but I don't believe this is an assumption you want to bet your iife on.)

    Zippering potential occurs mid-pitch whenever there is a transition from less than vertical rock to more than vertical rock. The rope will try to make a straight line from your first piece to your top piece if you fall. Nuts that do not lie in this straight line are likely to lift out unless slung so the rope-end carabiners do lie on the line.

    Something infrequently mentioned is that the leader is responsible for the safety of the second. The leader gets to choose the level of risk they are comfortable with, but the second is obliged to take risks imposed on them by the decisions of the leader.

    These issues come to the fore when the climb involves traverses. Before launching out on a traverse, the leader has got to arrange for a bombproof "pivot" piece if it is at all humanly possible. This is a moment when the whole ascent might have to slow down while the leader works to get in something good, and then they have got to place enough gear along the traverse to keep the second safe. One of the worst offenses in this regard happens when the traverse is easy, but the leader either places nothing or else installs a manky "pivot" piece at the start, leaving the second to climb the vertical bit before the traverse with an inadequate and possibly very dangerous level of protection.

    If the traverse is long and easy enough not to merit much protection, then the leader should arrange for a substantial redundant "pivot" piece; I have in some cases installed something equivalent to a belay anchor to make sure that the second is properly cared-for.

    Incompetence in protecting the second is climbing malpractice and deserves all the condemnation we are capable of mustering. You can't just be thinking about yourself up there.

    Folks mention starting on easy climbs so you can work on protection skills. But this is where you also learn about rope management, slinging, avoiding zippering, and proper protection for the second. You want to have a good hold on all these things before beginning to push into difficulty levels where you are significantly stressed by the climbing moves.


    superchuffer


    Aug 13, 2011, 9:53 PM
    Post #93 of 122 (5515 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 9, 2011
    Posts: 294

    Re: [rgold] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    dang dude, expand on your points more, it isn't clear enough. raining in NY and can't climb?


    sungam


    Aug 13, 2011, 9:55 PM
    Post #94 of 122 (5514 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 24, 2004
    Posts: 26804

    Re: [rgold] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    Rgold, man. That was a fantastic post as always. I am saving a spot on my bookshelf for when you decide to write a tome.


    Partner j_ung


    Aug 13, 2011, 11:22 PM
    Post #95 of 122 (5504 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 21, 2003
    Posts: 18690

    Re: [rescueman] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rescueman wrote:
    healyje wrote:
    rescueman wrote:
    The goal of trad climbing is to NOT fall, so practice that discipline.

    And to be honest I couldn't disagree more...

    It maybe a goal or 'discipline' in caving or in rescue - but certainly not in climbing, or at least not any concept of climbing I've ever held.
    It's the discipline I learned and nurtured from trad climbing long before I got involved in caving and rescue. And it's the discipline that has been central to alpine climbing since time immemorial.

    Sport climbing, however, is a completely different beast. As a sport, the goal is to constantly test one's limits and try to exceed them.

    Traditional climbing, like life itself, is a matter of learning to understand and live humbly within one's inherent limits - and to know when one is about to exceed them and then wisely back off.

    In reply to:
    But never falling? I'd say that is where the "leader must not fall" tripe should have been rooted out and put down for good once nylon was invented.

    Call it "tripe" if you're unable to understand this spiritual discipline. But believing that we can exceed our natural limitations by "better" technology is exactly why the human race is on the brink of global collapse and possible extinction.

    The ancient Greeks understood that all human tragedy is rooted in hubris.

    You're weird.


    Partner j_ung


    Aug 13, 2011, 11:29 PM
    Post #96 of 122 (5502 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Nov 21, 2003
    Posts: 18690

    Re: [rgold] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rgold wrote:
    Here's some advice I've posted at different times, I hope not incoherently cobbled together.

    The most important principle for using trad protection, especially but not exclusively if you are just learning, is redundancy. The idea is to develop a system you trust while maintaining a healthy scepticism about the reliability of any one piece. Try not to put yourself in the position of having a single piece, no matter how "bombproof," between you and disaster.

    Redundancy is a state of mind combined with the will to carry it out. Placing more than gear than seems to be essential requires discipline and endurance, marks of a good trad climber. Failing on a system is a better longevity option than betting the farm on a single piece.

    Nonetheless, all climbing to some extent, but trad climbing intrinsically, involves risk. A lot of climbs have places you better not fall from, and this is part of the essence of trad climbing---performing in a cool and controlled manner when confronting a risky situation. Neutralizing danger, not just by protection skills, but also by climbing skills, is part of the game.

    Although leader falls are an intrinsic part of modern trad climbing once you get to the higher classical levels, which start around 5.9, people who are in the process of learning protection shouldn't be falling. You will hear, "if the gear is bomber, go for it," which is fair enough, but such pronouncements avoid the real problem by defining it out of existence. Some accidents happen when the bomber gear turns out not to be bomber. The climber (1) misjudged the pro (something that is quite possible for experts, let alone beginners) or misjudged the effect that rope motions would have on the pro, (2) failed to build sufficient redundancy into the system, and then (3) misjudged their ability and went for it in a situation when they were not well protected.

    As for judging pro, experienced evaluation of your placements has value, but in addition to that I think top-roped aid climbing practice, with vigorous bounce-testing of every piece., is one of the best things you can do.

    More and more people seem to be learning by placing pieces and getting feedback from "experienced" climbers about their placements. In some cases, the "experienced" climbers learned the same way. Such advice can be very valuable, no doubt, but it is also possible that the learner is part of a chain of people who have never fortified their own "judgement" with some kind of testing. A person without extensive aid climbing experience who has climbed for a long time and never taken any leader falls themselves cannot offer expert advice on and/or evaluation of gear.

    But even genuinely experienced climbers can be wrong in their estimates 5% of the time. There is no substitute for placing, judging, and then testing yourself.

    If you can place pieces near bolts on sport climbs and then fall on those placements with the bolt for back-up protection, that seems like a good idea. You'd need sport climbs that have sufficient placements. Make sure that you aren't putting in gear whose failure might alter or erase holds, however, and practice when you aren't going to be in the way of others,

    For most people, top-rope aid practice is going to be the only available option. There are some other advantages to top-rope aiding.

    (1) Perhaps the main advantage is that you will learn something about how to aid. This is an essential skill for getting out of jams (route too hard, off route, unexpected wetness, onset of bad weather, approaching darkness, injured partner, etc. etc.).

    (BITD when big-wall climbing was the ultimate goal, folks learned free and aid climbing simultaneously. Now there are lots of trad climbers, some who are otherwise quite accomplished, who couldn't aid their way out of a paper bag.)

    (2) Aid climbing will inevitably force you to get creative with some placements, because the available terrain just above your current stance may not be optimal. This will be good practice for analogous trad climbing situations.

    (3) After finishing the pitch, you rap down with an experienced person and clean it. The experienced person should comment, not only on the placement itself, but also on whether there are better options nearby, something that beginners frequently miss, in my experience.

    Then you get to clean the pieces you placed and learn whether your placements lend themselves to cleaning, which is also critical for multipitch cimbs in general as well as for your wallet in particular. This may provide an opportunity for the experienced person to demonstrate some of the tricks of the trade when it comes to extracting recalcitrant gear.

    An important caveat about bounce-testing your placements: look at the placement carefully before you test it, but make sure to look away while testing it. If the piece blows, you don't want it to hit you in the face.

    Having said something about learning to get good protection, it is time to affirm again that part of trad climbing involves climbing without falling when falling is a bad idea. (For example, if there is one piece between you and the ground and you can't back it up, then falling is a bad idea.) Here I think modern trends can inculcate bad habits. Gym climbing, sport climbing, and bouldering all emphasize moving up in the most marginal of situations. There is a risk of developing an "upward" mentality that, first of all, accepts marginal moves even though the consequences of failure are catastrophic, perhaps not even noticing that the climber has gone from control to high risk status, and second of all, that takes upward motion as the only solution to a difficult situation, blinding the climber to both the need and the opportunity to climb down to rest, regroup, and yes, in some cases, to retreat.

    Mental discipline is the primary tool for avoiding the stress-induced upward stampede, but this discipline is not something acquired in the gym or on sport climbs, where it is counterproductive, and so retraining may be called for. Here are some exercises that may be of some use:

    (1) When climbing in the gym or on sport routes, try to be conscious of how marginal you are. (This does not mean reducing the difficulty level, just striving for heightened awareness.) From a trad perspective, a calculated fall may be ok, but an unexpected fall is not good. Strive to know when you are on the edge.

    (2) A lot of falls on steep ground happen when the leader runs out of gas. Try to develop a sense of your "half-way point," because this is one of the moments when you have to decide whether to move up away from your gear into a realm of longer and longer falls, or down towards your gear and the possibility of shorter falls. For example, a gym exercise is to select a challenging endurance route and then see how high on it you can get and still climb all the way back down without falling.

    (3) Develop the mental habit of filing away "retreat data." This can make the difference between stepping down and falling. (For example, when you step over a small roof, the holds underneath disappear. Did you make a mental note of features above the roof that will help you locate the holds underneath?)

    (4) Don't neglect the building of a base of climbing below your limit, climbing in which you are relatively comfortable but are also frequently in the "must not fall" zone. A steady diet of well-protected hard climbing at or near your limit, while essential for raising your climbing level, may shortchange you on control and calmness when things get dicey, as they will, sooner or later.

    One of the things the trad leader has to learn is rope management. Where the rope goes and what to do about it is decided for you on bolted routes, but when you are placing the gear, it is up to you to make placement choices and slinging choices that keep the rope running as you advance. Even experienced climbers find that they have made bad choices about gear location or slingage. But one of the differences is that the experienced climber will often climb back down and fix what was wrong, while the inexperienced climber will push on, finding later on that they can barely move because of rope drag.

    I think one of the most common errors experienced people make is placing nuts that zipper---meaning that the rope motions that occur during a fall lift the nuts out. (By the way, if you haven't taken leader falls, then you won't in general even know, except theoretically, what situations are critical in this regard). One thing to be careful about is to either have the belayer right up against the wall, or else place a first piece that is fully stable under an upward load. (I often hear people say a cam in a vertical crack satisfies this condition because it will just rotate upwards without pulling, but I don't believe this is an assumption you want to bet your iife on.)

    Zippering potential occurs mid-pitch whenever there is a transition from less than vertical rock to more than vertical rock. The rope will try to make a straight line from your first piece to your top piece if you fall. Nuts that do not lie in this straight line are likely to lift out unless slung so the rope-end carabiners do lie on the line.

    Something infrequently mentioned is that the leader is responsible for the safety of the second. The leader gets to choose the level of risk they are comfortable with, but the second is obliged to take risks imposed on them by the decisions of the leader.

    These issues come to the fore when the climb involves traverses. Before launching out on a traverse, the leader has got to arrange for a bombproof "pivot" piece if it is at all humanly possible. This is a moment when the whole ascent might have to slow down while the leader works to get in something good, and then they have got to place enough gear along the traverse to keep the second safe. One of the worst offenses in this regard happens when the traverse is easy, but the leader either places nothing or else installs a manky "pivot" piece at the start, leaving the second to climb the vertical bit before the traverse with an inadequate and possibly very dangerous level of protection.

    If the traverse is long and easy enough not to merit much protection, then the leader should arrange for a substantial redundant "pivot" piece; I have in some cases installed something equivalent to a belay anchor to make sure that the second is properly cared-for.

    Incompetence in protecting the second is climbing malpractice and deserves all the condemnation we are capable of mustering. You can't just be thinking about yourself up there.

    Folks mention starting on easy climbs so you can work on protection skills. But this is where you also learn about rope management, slinging, avoiding zippering, and proper protection for the second. You want to have a good hold on all these things before beginning to push into difficulty levels where you are significantly stressed by the climbing moves.

    You are, too, but in a better way.


    jacques


    Aug 14, 2011, 5:20 AM
    Post #97 of 122 (5474 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [rgold] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    rgold wrote:
    Here's some advice I've posted at different times, I hope not incoherently cobbled together.

    As for judging pro, experienced evaluation of your placements has value, but in addition to that I think top-roped aid climbing practice, with vigorous bounce-testing of every piece., is one of the best things you can do.

    good job.

    I wil also say; always keep your mind open to new situation, knowledge and opinion. For me, eperience evaluation is not good. In my opinion, I never know when a pro is good. I know why it is bad, If i find a pro bad, I wil do some think to make it secure. Placing a back up on it is somethink that can save your life. an experience can blow your belay with one hand, but I don`t think that he can told you if the pro is good.


    ladyscarlett


    Aug 15, 2011, 7:44 AM
    Post #98 of 122 (5406 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Dec 17, 2008
    Posts: 376

    Re: [cracklover] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    cracklover wrote:

    I dunno. I saw someone at a concert the other night. "She" looked like "she" was smuggling large grapefruits. But as for whether "she" was really converted? Maybe, maybe not. I didn't want to check.

    Point being - just having the rack is not conclusive evidence.

    GO

    you're right. Quality, size, elegance, action, and handling count too.

    I guess I still believe that the process of acquisition is the first step towards conversion. I forget that some never take it further than that...what a pity!

    Though maybe one is not a True Trad Covert til one has at least played with a few hexes?

    Heh

    cheers

    ls

    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...


    sungam


    Aug 15, 2011, 9:43 AM
    Post #99 of 122 (5401 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 24, 2004
    Posts: 26804

    Re: [ladyscarlett] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.


    jacques


    Aug 15, 2011, 2:26 PM
    Post #100 of 122 (5388 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [sungam] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    sungam wrote:
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    Hexes are use by old cimber mostly and they can climb at there top level at there gold age. The weight of an hexes is lower than a friend number 4. But, in any thing less than bummer rock, it's loading power is higher than with a cam.

    So, before Jarvin, many good climber do 5.11 route with hexes, route that we don't climb again because many climber loose some skill not necessary in sport and essential in trad.

    An other point is that cheatingg was not in the ethic in trad, but hanging on a rope, rap from above and other practice are normal in sport. The number of real good climber, who can onsight 5.11 and place hard pro, was lower before.


    ladyscarlett


    Aug 15, 2011, 6:23 PM
    Post #101 of 122 (4289 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Dec 17, 2008
    Posts: 376

    Re: [sungam] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    HAHAHA

    well, I can attest that these two weren't lead. And if we ever climb together, I'm gonna stash a few on your harness so I can keep up. Wink

    This nice thing about climbing at the lowest of the number grades is that there's no going lower til after the summit! I get to fool around with fearing of going down number grades.

    The hex was out of my understanding.

    But I have this itch for some non wired nuts (I'm gonna call them roped nuts til I'm corrected) after fiddling with a few...don't see that on a sport rack!

    ROPED NUTzzzzz!!! Heh

    still lovin it out there...

    ls


    donald949


    Aug 15, 2011, 6:45 PM
    Post #102 of 122 (4281 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 11455

    Re: [ladyscarlett] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ladyscarlett wrote:
    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    HAHAHA

    well, I can attest that these two weren't lead. And if we ever climb together, I'm gonna stash a few on your harness so I can keep up. Wink

    This nice thing about climbing at the lowest of the number grades is that there's no going lower til after the summit! I get to fool around with fearing of going down number grades.

    The hex was out of my understanding.

    But I have this itch for some non wired nuts (I'm gonna call them roped nuts til I'm corrected) after fiddling with a few...don't see that on a sport rack!

    ROPED NUTzzzzz!!! Heh

    still lovin it out there...

    ls
    Oh for the love of nuts, I have rope wired nuts.
    They're my best nuts. I made them myself I did. shaped them, drilled them, slung them, carefully slotted them. Fantastic.
    And yes Hexes have there place. Sure, cams are better in 90% of the placements, but the rest is for the hex.


    sbaclimber


    Aug 15, 2011, 7:58 PM
    Post #103 of 122 (4268 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 3118

    Re: [donald949] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    donald949 wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    HAHAHA

    well, I can attest that these two weren't lead. And if we ever climb together, I'm gonna stash a few on your harness so I can keep up. Wink

    This nice thing about climbing at the lowest of the number grades is that there's no going lower til after the summit! I get to fool around with fearing of going down number grades.

    The hex was out of my understanding.

    But I have this itch for some non wired nuts (I'm gonna call them roped nuts til I'm corrected) after fiddling with a few...don't see that on a sport rack!

    ROPED NUTzzzzz!!! Heh

    still lovin it out there...

    ls
    Oh for the love of nuts, I have rope wired nuts.
    They're my best nuts. I made them myself I did. shaped them, drilled them, slung them, carefully slotted them. Fantastic.
    And yes Hexes have there place. Sure, cams and tri-cams are better in 99% of the placements, but the rest is for the hex.
    Fixed that for ya... Wink


    donald949


    Aug 15, 2011, 8:38 PM
    Post #104 of 122 (4260 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 11455

    Re: [sbaclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    sbaclimber wrote:
    donald949 wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    HAHAHA

    well, I can attest that these two weren't lead. And if we ever climb together, I'm gonna stash a few on your harness so I can keep up. Wink

    This nice thing about climbing at the lowest of the number grades is that there's no going lower til after the summit! I get to fool around with fearing of going down number grades.

    The hex was out of my understanding.

    But I have this itch for some non wired nuts (I'm gonna call them roped nuts til I'm corrected) after fiddling with a few...don't see that on a sport rack!

    ROPED NUTzzzzz!!! Heh

    still lovin it out there...

    ls
    Oh for the love of nuts, I have rope wired nuts.
    They're my best nuts. I made them myself I did. shaped them, drilled them, slung them, carefully slotted them. Fantastic.
    And yes Hexes have there place. Sure, cams and tri-cams are better in 99% of the placements, but the rest is for the hex.
    Fixed that for ya... Wink
    Never did join the tricam cult. They look like they could be very usefull sometimes. Although never been anywhere all I had was a cam but wished for a tricam.


    DougMartin


    Aug 15, 2011, 10:43 PM
    Post #105 of 122 (4250 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 138

    Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ecade wrote:
    Wow ....
    I greatly appreciate much of the advice, I wish it could have been done without the personal attacks that ensued as I feel it limited the amount of responses and insights that could have been received, and at present the argument is not too pertinent to me as I am not climbing routes that I even think for a second i'd fall on.

    I have purchased a rack and have scratched her up a bit.

    I am in the no fall stage, but i'd not climb trad under the auspicity of "never fall". Otherwise, why would I spend a boat load of cash on gear to protect me. But eh, climbing is personal, its your life on the line so you make your own choices and, (hope to) live with them.

    I'd greatly appreciate more advice, if there are books worth reading (i've read just about everything by long), websites worth checking, persons who are generous with their time to answer questions please do not hesitate to private message me

    Safe and Happy Climbing to All.

    I agree with you 100%. Not one piece of advice in this thread has been really bad! Unfortunately one thing you do find on RC.com is a lot of back biting, my way is better than your way, I am just here to argue crap. It is few and far between threads that arguing is not the main focus. Then again watching idiots argue is interesting! I try to figure out who the bigger bone head is.

    One piece of advice I have for those wishing to get into trad, Trad climbing is not the place to search for your climbing limits. Leave that for the sport routes its safer Falling is not the intended outcome while trad climbing. Sure by climbing trad a guy leading 5.4 can grow and gain the experience and knowledge to ultimately climb at higher grades. However if climbing at a higher grade is your goal stay on the bolts, but if expanding your mental toughness, intestinal fortitude, and "overall" climbing knowledge then plug some pro with the rest of us trad guys.

    And just to add to the sport vs. trad argument I will say this, a climber leading 5.8 on trad can lead 5.11 on sport but the reverse is seldom true! Low numbers yes but legitimate numbers for the vast majority of those on this board. Very few people in world can climb a 5.12 and up regardless of what their RC profile says! Just being honest.


    bearbreeder


    Aug 15, 2011, 11:00 PM
    Post #106 of 122 (4243 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Feb 2, 2009
    Posts: 1960

    Re: [DougMartin] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    if you never put yrself in a position where you are likely to fall on trad ... eventually one of these days youll end up in a position where a fall can be very bad on a multipitch, and just when you need a calm head, youll get elvis legs because youre so scared from never making that type of mental move before

    been there, done that ...

    the trick is to go for it when the fall is clean and the gear is good ...

    and then there are place where you just dont fall ... like 50 feet above yr last gear on runnnout slab ..

    the trick is to know when you can or cant fall ... and if you cant downclimb back or retreat off pro in the latter ... have the mental state to calmly go for it ...

    which youll never get by never having climbed hard (as you a u can) on trad

    there are plenty of people who climb harder trad than sport in squamish ... simply because they climb trad all the time rather than sport ... and the physical moves can be quite different


    DougMartin


    Aug 15, 2011, 11:40 PM
    Post #107 of 122 (4230 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 138

    Re: [bearbreeder] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    bearbreeder wrote:
    if you never put yrself in a position where you are likely to fall on trad ... eventually one of these days youll end up in a position where a fall can be very bad on a multipitch, and just when you need a calm head, youll get elvis legs because youre so scared from never making that type of mental move before

    been there, done that ...

    the trick is to go for it when the fall is clean and the gear is good ...


    A very valid point and one that I agree with to a certain point. One thing that everyone must realize is that falling while being a knucklehead and trying things when you have no reasonable chance of success is not a wise move in trad. For one simple reason. Trad protection is inherently flawed. Things can go wrong even when most would find the pro "bomber", with no fault being on the person placing it to start with. Take a cam for instance a great placement to start with but just a little rope drag and it walks to a not so bomber placement, fails and a easy 10 foot fall turns into a twenty foot heart stopper! It happens more than any of us care to realize and because it typically ends only with a fast heartbeat it goes unnoticed by the world. So I agree yes falling is OK and it is going to happen while trad climbing. But that alone does not make it the place to be pushing the safety envelope! Our goal as climbers is to lessen or negate the risk while climbing. Push the limits on safety by intentionally taking a chance on a move you probably are not going to pull off is foolish and asking for trouble. So as a trad climber, I say don't try to pull it off down climb and find another way! Try it on bolts if you must try it! They are safer! (now to fend off those that want to argue the safety of a cam versus a bolt!)


    Partner drector


    Aug 16, 2011, 12:01 AM
    Post #108 of 122 (4225 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Aug 27, 2002
    Posts: 1037

    Re: [ecade] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    This is a very interesting thread. There was a discussion about limits that requires that I comment:

    I climb routes that require that I place protection on lead. I have no idea what my climbing limit is with that type of climbing because I never fall. I'm sure that I am not climbing at my limit but how would I know? Anyone who says that they know their limits but has never fallen really cannot know their limit. They're just guessing. That applies to driving, surfing, and any other silly comparison someone might make. If you have never passed the limit then you cannot know where it is, you can only guess.

    Even if you always climb below your limits on your trad pro, placing gear on lead is fun.

    There was a suggestion to aid climb too. I liked the suggestion. No matter what your climbing limit might be, you also need to learn the limits of the gear. Bouncing on every piece is a good way to learn about every placement you make. If you don't pop out some of your gear when training for aid climbing then you aren't bouncing hard enough or you are just great at placing gear. I doubt that you will be great at it right off the bat. If your pro can't take the test of a good bounce on a static aider then it's not going to catch your big free climbing fall either.

    Aid is fun in it's own slow sort of way. Maybe you'll like it.

    I personally jumped on the sharp end of the rope before I was comfortable but I placed a lot of protection and climbed short single pitch routes for a long time before adding in the complexity of belay anchors and other multi-pitch issues. Add one new thing at a time until you are a complete trad climbing dynamo.

    Dave


    bearbreeder


    Aug 16, 2011, 12:20 AM
    Post #109 of 122 (4222 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Feb 2, 2009
    Posts: 1960

    Re: [DougMartin] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    DougMartin wrote:

    A very valid point and one that I agree with to a certain point. One thing that everyone must realize is that falling while being a knucklehead and trying things when you have no reasonable chance of success is not a wise move in trad. For one simple reason. Trad protection is inherently flawed. Things can go wrong even when most would find the pro "bomber", with no fault being on the person placing it to start with. Take a cam for instance a great placement to start with but just a little rope drag and it walks to a not so bomber placement, fails and a easy 10 foot fall turns into a twenty foot heart stopper! It happens more than any of us care to realize and because it typically ends only with a fast heartbeat it goes unnoticed by the world. So I agree yes falling is OK and it is going to happen while trad climbing. But that alone does not make it the place to be pushing the safety envelope! Our goal as climbers is to lessen or negate the risk while climbing. Push the limits on safety by intentionally taking a chance on a move you probably are not going to pull off is foolish and asking for trouble. So as a trad climber, I say don't try to pull it off down climb and find another way! Try it on bolts if you must try it! They are safer! (now to fend off those that want to argue the safety of a cam versus a bolt!)

    it really depends on the pro ... if theres enough for some good DP or TP action Wink... i generally say go for it ... you have to remember that if you can fit 3 solid pieces in ... thats almost an anchor setup as well ... you can even equalize them ...

    at a certain point you will be going up routes were a fall is very possible or even likely once you start getting to more vertical and overhung walls ... and quite often you cant practice those on sport leads ... different types of climbing ...


    DougMartin


    Aug 16, 2011, 12:58 AM
    Post #110 of 122 (4218 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 138

    Re: [bearbreeder] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    bearbreeder wrote:
    DougMartin wrote:

    A very valid point and one that I agree with to a certain point. One thing that everyone must realize is that falling while being a knucklehead and trying things when you have no reasonable chance of success is not a wise move in trad. For one simple reason. Trad protection is inherently flawed. Things can go wrong even when most would find the pro "bomber", with no fault being on the person placing it to start with. Take a cam for instance a great placement to start with but just a little rope drag and it walks to a not so bomber placement, fails and a easy 10 foot fall turns into a twenty foot heart stopper! It happens more than any of us care to realize and because it typically ends only with a fast heartbeat it goes unnoticed by the world. So I agree yes falling is OK and it is going to happen while trad climbing. But that alone does not make it the place to be pushing the safety envelope! Our goal as climbers is to lessen or negate the risk while climbing. Push the limits on safety by intentionally taking a chance on a move you probably are not going to pull off is foolish and asking for trouble. So as a trad climber, I say don't try to pull it off down climb and find another way! Try it on bolts if you must try it! They are safer! (now to fend off those that want to argue the safety of a cam versus a bolt!)

    it really depends on the pro ... if theres enough for some good DP or TP action Wink... i generally say go for it ... you have to remember that if you can fit 3 solid pieces in ... thats almost an anchor setup as well ... you can even equalize them ...

    at a certain point you will be going up routes were a fall is very possible or even likely once you start getting to more vertical and overhung walls ... and quite often you cant practice those on sport leads ... different types of climbing ...

    Here is another issue, if every time I climb I am placing three when its gonna be sketchy then how in the heck do I have any gear for an anchor? Are we not always on the very edge of sketchy to begin with? I agree that when we are about to make a move that could result in a fall or when a fall would result in disaster we should do everything we can to prevent either. Even if it is three pieces of gear! But again I say that Traditional climbing is not a place to push limits of ones climbing ability. Your supposed to climb without falling. They do call it climbing not falling for a reason!

    Getting off topic to make a point on the topic,I know I have no business climbing a 5.11. I struggle with 5.10 on top rope. But I am everyday working on my technique, strength and stamina to get better on those 5.10's, and may someday actually get my skills to the 5.11 level. (I actually did climb 5.11 once but it was a fluke I still don't believe I actually pulled the crux). What is important to realize is that these routes are all on top rope. I would never try to climb a 5.10 on lead! Its above my ability! 5.8 is my limit, I know it and respect it, and have no business pushing it. My belayer nor a SAR team is going to be dealing with an accident because my ego told me to go for it! Trad is not the place to screw around with limits. Falling because you screwed up a "sequencey" move or missed a foot hold is one thing falling because your an idiot is another!


    bearbreeder


    Aug 16, 2011, 1:11 AM
    Post #111 of 122 (4213 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Feb 2, 2009
    Posts: 1960

    Re: [DougMartin] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    DougMartin wrote:
    Here is another issue, if every time I climb I am placing three when its gonna be sketchy then how in the heck do I have any gear for an anchor? Are we not always on the very edge of sketchy to begin with? I agree that when we are about to make a move that could result in a fall or when a fall would result in disaster we should do everything we can to prevent either. Even if it is three pieces of gear! But again I say that Traditional climbing is not a place to push limits of ones climbing ability. Your supposed to climb without falling. They do call it climbing not falling for a reason!

    Getting off topic to make a point on the topic,I know I have no business climbing a 5.11. I struggle with 5.10 on top rope. But I am everyday working on my technique, strength and stamina to get better on those 5.10's, and may someday actually get my skills to the 5.11 level. (I actually did climb 5.11 once but it was a fluke I still don't believe I actually pulled the crux). What is important to realize is that these routes are all on top rope. I would never try to climb a 5.10 on lead! Its above my ability! 5.8 is my limit, I know it and respect it, and have no business pushing it. My belayer nor a SAR team is going to be dealing with an accident because my ego told me to go for it! Trad is not the place to screw around with limits. Falling because you screwed up a "sequencey" move or missed a foot hold is one thing falling because your an idiot is another!

    thats why if its at yr limit, some people climb with doubles in the sizes the think theyll need ... or tripples ...

    from yr post you havent climbed hard trad (11s and above, well hard for me) ... i dont claim to be a baddass hardman .. but at a certain point youll have to take the jump of getting on climbs you have a very good chance of falling on in order to progress both mentally and physically ...

    the trick is to make sure as much as possible that those climbs have good pro, clean falls, and you have extra gear ...

    one of these days youll end up leading on a bigger wall, and youll need to make those moves on less than perfect gear ...

    no offense ... but if yr not consistently leading 10- trad, you probably shouldnt be offering advice about falling on trad ... as it gets towards the 10s range, at least here in squamish, that the trad falls get cleaner ... and falls happen more often ...


    DougMartin


    Aug 16, 2011, 1:52 AM
    Post #112 of 122 (4200 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 138

    Re: [bearbreeder] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    In reply to:
    no offense ... but if yr not consistently leading 10- trad, you probably shouldnt be offering advice about falling on trad ... as it gets towards the 10s range, at least here in squamish, that the trad falls get cleaner ... and falls happen more often ...

    None taken, I am by no means offering advice on taking falls. I am however offering advice on not taking falls in trad. OP is a good sport climber that wants help being converted. Many have said do this and do that. I say do everything they have been saying but don't test your climbing ability, like me the OP is way to new at this game (trad) to be pushing any limits (climbing or otherwise). Stupidity will kill you!


    DougMartin


    Aug 16, 2011, 1:55 AM
    Post #113 of 122 (4196 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 138

    Re: [drector] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    drector wrote:
    This is a very interesting thread. There was a discussion about limits that requires that I comment:

    I personally jumped on the sharp end of the rope before I was comfortable but I placed a lot of protection and climbed short single pitch routes for a long time before adding in the complexity of belay anchors and other multi-pitch issues. Add one new thing at a time until you are a complete trad climbing dynamo.

    Dave

    +1
    Well said! One step at a time!


    jacques


    Aug 16, 2011, 2:25 AM
    Post #114 of 122 (4189 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [DougMartin] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    DougMartin wrote:
    But again I say that Traditional climbing is not a place to push limits of ones climbing ability. Your supposed to climb without falling

    I just do trad climbing and I always climb or try to climb at my limit. Climbing at your limit means a referennce to something. If you compare trad with sport...it is true that you can climb a move like a trad climber did on top rope...and push your limit.

    If you just climb trad, your limit is note only a move. It is also a rating G, R or X. A 5.7X move can be harder than a 5.10G move. So, I improve many skill and always climb my route onsight at the higher rate. Fugue, handson echard, dolomite wall, odessey at canon are my limit actually. But I still can fall on ventilator or missing link because. as I onsighted it, I can practice how to fall and how I can climb 5.11 eventually onsight.

    The choice between trad and sport is not a question to know which style is more respectable than the other. Personally, knowing my pro, rope management, how to fall, keeping my concentration, etc, is more fun than controlling my body to place my hands and feet at the good place after working my project. I will also say that golf is not fun because you run after a ball like a dog. It is differrent and I can push my limit on trad.


    DougMartin


    Aug 16, 2011, 2:55 AM
    Post #115 of 122 (4185 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 138

    Re: [jacques] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    jacques wrote:
    DougMartin wrote:
    But again I say that Traditional climbing is not a place to push limits of ones climbing ability. Your supposed to climb without falling


    The choice between trad and sport is not a question to know which style is more respectable than the other. Personally, knowing my pro, rope management, how to fall, keeping my concentration, etc, is more fun than controlling my body to place my hands and feet at the good place after working my project. I will also say that golf is not fun because you run after a ball like a dog. It is differrent and I can push my limit on trad.


    Do you believe that a good sport climber should be testing his climbing ability when he is introducing himself to trad leading and all its complexities? If you do, you are being irresponsible to another climber! As a self proclaimed seasoned climber you have every reason to be on the edge of your abilities but not a new guy! Screw going for a 5.10 firs time out, climb 5.2 a million times and slam a ton of pro each time then think about stepping up to 5.3. This is not a sport where you shake hands with the loser, you can die if you screw up!

    Sport or trad makes no difference, well wait a minute, Grab quick draw and clip big round bolt while holding a small crimper or wiggle a nut in a small constricting crack then change to a bigger nut and wiggle some more, then grab quick draw and clip all while holding on to a small crimper. Ok, you decide if sport and trad are equivalent! For me they both have qualities that are beneficial but they are by no means the same! And they should not be done with the same attitude! Go for the gold on sport but be conservative and attentive on trad!


    sbaclimber


    Aug 16, 2011, 8:19 AM
    Post #116 of 122 (4173 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jan 22, 2004
    Posts: 3118

    Re: [donald949] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    donald949 wrote:
    sbaclimber wrote:
    donald949 wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    HAHAHA

    well, I can attest that these two weren't lead. And if we ever climb together, I'm gonna stash a few on your harness so I can keep up. Wink

    This nice thing about climbing at the lowest of the number grades is that there's no going lower til after the summit! I get to fool around with fearing of going down number grades.

    The hex was out of my understanding.

    But I have this itch for some non wired nuts (I'm gonna call them roped nuts til I'm corrected) after fiddling with a few...don't see that on a sport rack!

    ROPED NUTzzzzz!!! Heh

    still lovin it out there...

    ls
    Oh for the love of nuts, I have rope wired nuts.
    They're my best nuts. I made them myself I did. shaped them, drilled them, slung them, carefully slotted them. Fantastic.
    And yes Hexes have there place. Sure, cams and tri-cams are better in 99% of the placements, but the rest is for the hex.
    Fixed that for ya... Wink
    Never did join the tricam cult. They look like they could be very usefull sometimes. Although never been anywhere all I had was a cam but wished for a tricam.
    You haven't climbed enough pocketed limestone then. Tongue


    jacques


    Aug 16, 2011, 3:17 PM
    Post #117 of 122 (4161 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 318

    Re: [DougMartin] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    "DougMartin wrote:
    Do you believe that a good sport climber should be testing his climbing ability when he is introducing himself to trad leading and all its complexities? If you do, you are being irresponsible to another climber! As a self proclaimed seasoned climber you have every reason to be on the edge of your abilities but not a new guy!

    Good. I think the same. I agree with what you said and I bring precision on what I am saying.

    new guy: someone who never climb

    learning trad: learning how to fall by following a leader for one year in remote area (not one pitch where the rock show you where to place pro; area with a traversse where the second most do a pendulum like falling aspiration or vertigo); learning to place pro and fall on aid climbing by testing the pro...not just hanging on the best pro a guy can use when he stand on a good stanse, learning rope management with a guide or a good leader, learning how the climber react in a stressfull situation by leading easy pitches.

    learning sport: learning to trust the equipment (in trad you learn the limit of your equipment), learning to clip bolt, learning to try any thing to improve.

    In saying that, don't make a comparaison between learning to try a move in trad or learning to try a move in sport. I said that the number of skill: jumping in a safe place instead of falling, placing a good pro in a bad situation (retaliation, cathedral), rope drag and fall factor, how to do a good belay, how you respond to stress as a climber (seven reaction to stress...panic is the worse), etc. so I just said that the number of skill that we have to push our limit is more diversify than in sport. So, you climb easier move, but we push our limit on different aspect of climbing.

    People who always want to bolt trad route are people who can not push there limit in one of the many skill of trad climbing. It is not a fault...except that they don't understand that the penalize other good climber.


    donald949


    Aug 16, 2011, 8:39 PM
    Post #118 of 122 (4147 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 11455

    Re: [sbaclimber] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    sbaclimber wrote:
    donald949 wrote:
    sbaclimber wrote:
    donald949 wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    ps- it was a hexish weekend and they are still on my mind...
    I am not convinced. There is no way, NO WAY, that hexes were useful. It's a well known fact that hexes are useless lead-weights that drop you 2 number grades.

    HAHAHA

    well, I can attest that these two weren't lead. And if we ever climb together, I'm gonna stash a few on your harness so I can keep up. Wink

    This nice thing about climbing at the lowest of the number grades is that there's no going lower til after the summit! I get to fool around with fearing of going down number grades.

    The hex was out of my understanding.

    But I have this itch for some non wired nuts (I'm gonna call them roped nuts til I'm corrected) after fiddling with a few...don't see that on a sport rack!

    ROPED NUTzzzzz!!! Heh

    still lovin it out there...

    ls
    Oh for the love of nuts, I have rope wired nuts.
    They're my best nuts. I made them myself I did. shaped them, drilled them, slung them, carefully slotted them. Fantastic.
    And yes Hexes have there place. Sure, cams and tri-cams are better in 99% of the placements, but the rest is for the hex.
    Fixed that for ya... Wink
    Never did join the tricam cult. They look like they could be very usefull sometimes. Although never been anywhere all I had was a cam but wished for a tricam.
    You haven't climbed enough pocketed limestone then. Tongue
    Actually haven't climbed any limestone.
    Oh, and I found the pic of my nuts, umm, er, homemade stoppers.




    ladyscarlett


    Aug 16, 2011, 9:20 PM
    Post #119 of 122 (4141 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Dec 17, 2008
    Posts: 376

    Re: [donald949] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    purtee colors...

    I'd never used roped stoppers before this weekend and honestly I can see the appeal of having a few of these on a light rack.

    Of course, wired ones seem really nice for small stuff, but I kinda like the flexibility of the roped ones. Then again, all the roped stoppers I played with were BIG - bigger than my thumb! made them easier to place for sure.

    Oh damn...guess I really AM converted. Is this the light side, dark side, or just the steep and high side?

    heh

    Cheers

    ls


    sungam


    Aug 16, 2011, 9:30 PM
    Post #120 of 122 (4138 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Jun 24, 2004
    Posts: 26804

    Re: [ladyscarlett] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ladyscarlett wrote:
    Is this the light side, dark side, or just the steep and high side?
    This is the side of the coin - careful, though. A few more steps and you'll stumble over to the real dark side... Alpinism.


    ladyscarlett


    Aug 16, 2011, 9:41 PM
    Post #121 of 122 (4133 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: Dec 17, 2008
    Posts: 376

    Re: [sungam] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    sungam wrote:
    ladyscarlett wrote:
    Is this the light side, dark side, or just the steep and high side?
    This is the side of the coin - careful, though. A few more steps and you'll stumble over to the real dark side... Alpinism.

    Don't start...got a mini soft taste of it this weekend in the Tahoe area. I've the afterglow of much pleasure and when that's just a taste (sanitized for a n00b) I just want to keep on sinking into the pleasures of getting far out and high up. The dark side you say? Perhaps less stumbling, more the 4th class scrambles I love?

    hee hee

    ls

    ps - does this count as a thread hijack? can't tell...


    donald949


    Aug 16, 2011, 10:31 PM
    Post #122 of 122 (4128 views)
    Shortcut

    Registered: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 11455

    Re: [ladyscarlett] Help Convert Me! [In reply to]
    Report this Post
    Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
    Can't Post

    ladyscarlett wrote:
    purtee colors...

    I'd never used roped stoppers before this weekend and honestly I can see the appeal of having a few of these on a light rack.

    Of course, wired ones seem really nice for small stuff, but I kinda like the flexibility of the roped ones. Then again, all the roped stoppers I played with were BIG - bigger than my thumb! made them easier to place for sure.

    Oh damn...guess I really AM converted. Is this the light side, dark side, or just the steep and high side?

    heh

    Cheers

    ls
    Thanks.
    They were origonally strung with kevlar, but since that was almost 20 years old I restrung them a couple years ago. I got a small spool of tech cord, and restrung all my hexes and these 3 stoppers.
    But they are not really light weight. Since they are solid. But they are amung my favs, nice finger crack size.


    Forums : Climbing Disciplines : Trad Climbing

     


    Search for (options)

    Log In:

    Username:
    Password: Remember me:

    Go Register
    Go Lost Password?



    Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook