Forums: Climbing Information: Beginners:
Post deleted by drumnaaron
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for Beginners

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 3:25 AM
Post #76 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Well, the idea that nobody ever backclips--and that is why there are no reported instances of unclipping the rope in a backclipped fall is an interesting theory, but it is nothing more than that.

My theory is that people do backclip and fall frequently with no bad outcomes reported, because backclipping is really not such a big deal. Having said that, I doubt we will find any data to support either of our positions.

Curt


ajkclay


Oct 14, 2004, 3:30 AM
Post #77 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2002
Posts: 1567

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Nuh uh pal, you can't get away with that kind of assertion after all of the bullsh!t you ask of everyone else who makes any kind of statement: "Where is the proof Buddy?" Show me the research, and I'm not talking about a "how to" book, I want multiple examples of PUBLISHED PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES! Otherwise by your own standards we can safely assume that you are talking crap. After all, that seems to be the only way you will accept any information from anyone else.

Or is it one standard for JT and another for everyone else?


jt512


Oct 14, 2004, 3:30 AM
Post #78 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Well, the idea that nobody ever backclips--and that is why there are no reported instances of unclipping the rope in a backclipped fall is an interesting theory, but it is nothing more than that.

My theory is that people do backclip and fall frequently with no bad outcomes reported, because backclipping is really not such a big deal.

Curt

Yes, except your theory is wrong on its face because it is a fact that people don't fall frequently onto backclipped bolts. That sport climbers don't backclip is not a theory. They don't.

-Jay


ajkclay


Oct 14, 2004, 3:31 AM
Post #79 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2002
Posts: 1567

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Nuh uh pal, you can't get away with that kind of assertion after all of the bullsh!t you ask of everyone else who makes any kind of statement: "Where is the proof Buddy?" Show me the research, and I'm not talking about a "how to" book, I want multiple examples of PUBLISHED PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES! Otherwise by your own standards we can safely assume that you are talking crap. After all, that seems to be the only way you will accept any information from anyone else.

Or is it one standard for JT and another for everyone else?


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 3:51 AM
Post #80 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Well, the idea that nobody ever backclips--and that is why there are no reported instances of unclipping the rope in a backclipped fall is an interesting theory, but it is nothing more than that.

My theory is that people do backclip and fall frequently with no bad outcomes reported, because backclipping is really not such a big deal.

Curt

Yes, except your theory is wrong on its face because it is a fact that people don't fall frequently onto backclipped bolts. That sport climbers don't backclip is not a theory. They don't.

-Jay

I am inclined to disagree with your assertion here since many n00bs, fresh out of the gym, do go sport climbing without having any real idea what they are doing. And--they do fall, without even knowing what the hell a "backclip" is. You, yourself have posted about observing such n00bs in action many times. I think the truth is that the living room party trick where you unclip a rope from a carabiner held firmly in your hand does not represent what happens in the real world of climbing.

Curt


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 4:00 AM
Post #81 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I can debate with jt512 on my own. I would like to know how someone made the above post using my user ID.

Curt


jt512


Oct 14, 2004, 4:11 AM
Post #82 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Nuh uh pal, you can't get away with that kind of assertion after all of the bullsh!t you ask of everyone else who makes any kind of statement: "Where is the proof Buddy?" Show me the research, and I'm not talking about a "how to" book, I want multiple examples of PUBLISHED PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES! Otherwise by your own standards we can safely assume that you are talking crap. After all, that seems to be the only way you will accept any information from anyone else.

Or is it one standard for JT and another for everyone else?

Dang, how did you escape from my killfile? Well, since you're out...

You want research? OK. Public notice: I'm hereby recruiting volunteer subjects for the First UnClipping Trial ever conducted in a scientifically rigorous manner. The FUCT will be a single-blind trial of the relative danger of back-clipping vs. normal clipping. 1000 climbers will each take 100 falls from various pre-detemined heights above a bolt under controlled conditions. On each fall the bolt will either have been pre-clipped normally or back-clipped by study personnel. The bolt will be hidden from view from the climber by a custom device so that the FUCT climber cannot alter his fall in response to whether the bolt is backclipped or normally clipped. FUCT climbers are advised to have their hospitalization insurance premiums paid-up, and will have to sign a waiver drafted by Allan Dershewitz.

So, Ajclay, are you ready to volunteer to be one of the FUCT climbers? It's for a good cause.

-Jay


Partner holdplease2


Oct 14, 2004, 4:27 AM
Post #83 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 18, 2002
Posts: 1733

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Gentlemen, lets explore this issue with our heart of hearts.

You are stranded on a desert island.

But you are not alone.

A lovely boulderer chickey (from boulder, but importantly incapable of speech due to whatever trauma, therefore still attractive) in a prana top is there with you.

AND She is hhhooootttt.

However, you know that unless you can get her some beer goggles, you ain't gettin' none o' that.

On a solitary afternoon stroll, you stumble across a tap. Curious, you look up to note a single bolt glinting in the sun 75 feet off the deck.

Conveniently, you have woven a hemp rope from your "garden" and you have one quickdraw, which you have been using as a keychain.

You decide to rope-solo to the top of the pinacle, using the tap wedged between two stones as your solo anchor.

You arrive at the top of the climb to find a keg. Of Guinness. Or whaver.

You immediately realize the significance of this.

Visualizing sandy prana top floating in the waves, you wonder how on earth you will safely transport the keg to the deck. The walkoff is dicy 5th class downclimbing.

You formulate a plan.

You must detach your rope from the top anchor, secure it to the keg, and toss the keg from the climb. Your calculations indicate that the keg will be suspended a convenient 2.7 feet above the ground when the rope comes tight on the SINGLE BOLT between the summit and the deck, delivering your lucious booty (which will deliver equally lucious booty) to an appropriate level for easy access and consumption.

Ecstasy or disaster await...

You wonder how you clipped that draw...


Did you normal clip?
Did you back clip?


With so much riding on that one clip, which would you prefer?



-Kate.


jt512


Oct 14, 2004, 4:27 AM
Post #84 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Well, the idea that nobody ever backclips--and that is why there are no reported instances of unclipping the rope in a backclipped fall is an interesting theory, but it is nothing more than that.

My theory is that people do backclip and fall frequently with no bad outcomes reported, because backclipping is really not such a big deal.

Curt

Yes, except your theory is wrong on its face because it is a fact that people don't fall frequently onto backclipped bolts. That sport climbers don't backclip is not a theory. They don't.

-Jay

I am inclined to disagree with your assertion here since many n00bs, fresh out of the gym, do go sport climbing without having any real idea what they are doing. And--they do fall, without even knowing what the hell a "backclip" is.

Again, I disagree. They learn in the gym what backclipping is. An uncorrected backclip at a sport crag, even among noobs, is unusual, and the taboo against it, very strong. Consequently, if the n00b doesn't catch his own backclip, his partner, or someone else at the crag almost always will, and the n00b will correct it.

In reply to:
You, yourself have posted about observing such n00bs in action many times.


I have never seen anyone fall on a backclipped draw.

In reply to:
I think the truth is that the living room party trick where you unclip a rope from a carabiner held firmly in your hand does not represent what happens in the real world of climbing.

I don't hold the bottom carabiner firmly, though I do hold the top biner firmly. I cannot prove that the living room model fits the real situation. However, it's close; and given the plausibility of unclipping, and the risk of injury should it occur, the only logical choice is not to take the risk. After all, there is no reason not to back clip.

-Jay


jt512


Oct 14, 2004, 4:33 AM
Post #85 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Gentlemen, lets explore this issue with our heart of hearts.

You are stranded on a desert island.

But you are not alone.

A lovely boulderer chickey (from boulder, but importantly incapable of speech due to whatever trauma, therefore still attractive) in a prana top is there with you.

AND She is hhhooootttt.

[snip]

Lucky for you, upstaging a Senior Moderator is not against the TOS.

-Jay


Partner holdplease2


Oct 14, 2004, 4:39 AM
Post #86 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 18, 2002
Posts: 1733

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

:D


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 4:44 AM
Post #87 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I must now issue my most profound and final comment on the topic at hand.
























































Whatever.

Curt


Partner coylec


Oct 14, 2004, 4:45 AM
Post #88 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2003
Posts: 2024

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
FUCT climbers are advised to have their hospitalization insurance premiums paid-up, and will have to sign a waiver drafted by Allan Dershewitz.

It's Alan Dershowitz (though, mad props on the reference). And, I think he'll be busy either defending charges of plagarism -- he did lift some passages from Joan Peters -- or, as I think, being Saddam's lawyer. However, you could probably get one of his buddies from OJ's "dream team". I know Johnny's got a court date in front of the Supreme Court next year, but in the meantime ...

Seriously though, how much are you compensating for your FUCT climbers? 'cause I'm real broke and have real good health insurance. So long as you've got a good bolt below the test bolt, I'd do it. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

coylec


jt512


Oct 14, 2004, 4:46 AM
Post #89 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
I must now issue my most profound and final comment on the topic at hand.

Whatever.

Curt

I think after Kate's post, we can all go home.

-Jay


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 4:49 AM
Post #90 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
I must now issue my most profound and final comment on the topic at hand.

Whatever.

Curt

I think after Kate's post, we can all go home.

-Jay

Amen.

Curt


ajkclay


Oct 14, 2004, 5:35 AM
Post #91 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 9, 2002
Posts: 1567

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Nuh uh pal, you can't get away with that kind of assertion after all of the bullsh!t you ask of everyone else who makes any kind of statement: "Where is the proof Buddy?" Show me the research, and I'm not talking about a "how to" book, I want multiple examples of PUBLISHED PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES! Otherwise by your own standards we can safely assume that you are talking crap. After all, that seems to be the only way you will accept any information from anyone else.

Or is it one standard for JT and another for everyone else?

Dang, how did you escape from my killfile? Well, since you're out...

You want research? OK. Public notice: I'm hereby recruiting volunteer subjects for the First UnClipping Trial ever conducted in a scientifically rigorous manner. The FUCT will be a single-blind trial of the relative danger of back-clipping vs. normal clipping. 1000 climbers will each take 100 falls from various pre-detemined heights above a bolt under controlled conditions. On each fall the bolt will either have been pre-clipped normally or back-clipped by study personnel. The bolt will be hidden from view from the climber by a custom device so that the FUCT climber cannot alter his fall in response to whether the bolt is backclipped or normally clipped. FUCT climbers are advised to have their hospitalization insurance premiums paid-up, and will have to sign a waiver drafted by Allan Dershewitz.

So, Ajclay, are you ready to volunteer to be one of the FUCT climbers? It's for a good cause.

-Jay

Well, you obviously have not paid any attention to the way they test gear have you? Are you asking me and everyone else to believe that they test ropes for fall ratings by dropping people? Idiot!

No tests published = JT full of sh!t

It's your standard buddy, so provide some evidence or STFU!

Funny how you would come up with a FUCT Trial, did that come from your head? I always thought you were FUCT in the Head! :lol:


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 6:05 AM
Post #92 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
In reply to:
Have you honestly ever seen this happen? I mean a backclipped carabiner coming detatched from a rope in a fall? I don't mean some third party story either--have you actually seen this happen in your 20 years of climbing? Because nobody I know has.
Curt

I haven't seen or heard of it happening, but the only reason for this, I believe, is that those who fall often -- ie, sport climbers -- don't back clip, and those who back clip -- ie, some long-time trad climbers -- don't fall often.

To me, the danger is obvious. You can easily picture how the rope could unclip if back clipped; indeed, as I said above, I've seen a situation in which I think the rope would most likely have unclipped, quite possibly from multiple biners, had the leader actually fallen. Furthermore, you can replicate the mechanism by just flicking a rope that has been backclipped across the the gate of a biner by hand. This danger is widely recognized, to the point, that essentially no sport climber backclips, and consequently there are no cases of unclipping to observe.

-Jay

Nuh uh pal, you can't get away with that kind of assertion after all of the bullsh!t you ask of everyone else who makes any kind of statement: "Where is the proof Buddy?" Show me the research, and I'm not talking about a "how to" book, I want multiple examples of PUBLISHED PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLES! Otherwise by your own standards we can safely assume that you are talking crap. After all, that seems to be the only way you will accept any information from anyone else.

Or is it one standard for JT and another for everyone else?

Dang, how did you escape from my killfile? Well, since you're out...

You want research? OK. Public notice: I'm hereby recruiting volunteer subjects for the First UnClipping Trial ever conducted in a scientifically rigorous manner. The FUCT will be a single-blind trial of the relative danger of back-clipping vs. normal clipping. 1000 climbers will each take 100 falls from various pre-detemined heights above a bolt under controlled conditions. On each fall the bolt will either have been pre-clipped normally or back-clipped by study personnel. The bolt will be hidden from view from the climber by a custom device so that the FUCT climber cannot alter his fall in response to whether the bolt is backclipped or normally clipped. FUCT climbers are advised to have their hospitalization insurance premiums paid-up, and will have to sign a waiver drafted by Allan Dershewitz.

So, Ajclay, are you ready to volunteer to be one of the FUCT climbers? It's for a good cause.

-Jay

Well, you obviously have not paid any attention to the way they test gear have you? Are you asking me and everyone else to believe that they test ropes for fall ratings by dropping people? Idiot!

No tests published = JT full of sh!t

It's your standard buddy, so provide some evidence or STFU!

Funny how you would come up with a FUCT Trial, did that come from your head? I always thought you were FUCT in the Head! :lol:

Ooooooh Burrrrrrrn. Haha. BTW, Jay means well, he is just a nerd.

Curt


alpnclmbr1


Oct 14, 2004, 7:14 AM
Post #93 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 10, 2002
Posts: 3060

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Backclipping is the sport climbing name for a longstanding TRAD rule. (agreed that it is rarely an issue on modern trad climbing, except for slab)

The rule originated with single biner clips to a pin. If you backclip, you can pinch the rope between the biner and the rock. Or you can allow the rope to bind in a loop around the body of the carabiner. Unclipping didn't become much of an issue until the advent of bent gate biners.

I believe it is in basic and advanced rockcraft.
I know it is in the 1975 Basic Rock Climbing by R.C.Aleith.


sarcat


Oct 14, 2004, 2:04 PM
Post #94 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jan 22, 2004
Posts: 1560

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I'm sorry... I went home after Jay and Curt said I could.

What happened?


kobaz


Oct 14, 2004, 4:56 PM
Post #95 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 19, 2004
Posts: 726

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Well, you obviously have not paid any attention to the way they test gear have you? Are you asking me and everyone else to believe that they test ropes for fall ratings by dropping people? Idiot!

I hope that was sarcasim. But in the event that you actually mean that I feel bad for you. Jay posted a test that he came up with to be ridiculus as well as prove a point. Most of us do know how the uiaa testing is done.


curt


Oct 14, 2004, 5:02 PM
Post #96 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Backclipping is the sport climbing name for a longstanding TRAD rule. (agreed that it is rarely an issue on modern trad climbing, except for slab)

The rule originated with single biner clips to a pin. If you backclip, you can pinch the rope between the biner and the rock. Or you can allow the rope to bind in a loop around the body of the carabiner. Unclipping didn't become much of an issue until the advent of bent gate biners.

Now, there is an excellent example of where backclipping actually could be an issue, because a single carabiner can potentially bind tightly against a fixed pin or a bolt hanger. Extrapolating this to be a general climbing concern, however, is quite nonsensical.

Curt


jt512


Oct 14, 2004, 7:56 PM
Post #97 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

In reply to:
Well, you obviously have not paid any attention to the way they test gear have you? Are you asking me and everyone else to believe that they test ropes for fall ratings by dropping people? Idiot!

No tests published = JT full of sh!t

It's your standard buddy, so provide some evidence or STFU!

I really have no idea what point, if any, you are trying to make. Where your thinking, if you can call it that, seems to lead is that, since no studies have been done, then it must be ok to back clip. If you think that is a logical conclusion, then by all means, go ahead and back clip. Essentially, you, then, will be the study.

-Jay


billcoe_


Oct 14, 2004, 8:10 PM
Post #98 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 30, 2002
Posts: 4694

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

JT SCORES AGAIN! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


dirtineye


Oct 14, 2004, 9:57 PM
Post #99 of 131 (11091 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Mar 29, 2003
Posts: 5590

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

How do I get to this island that Holdplease2 is talking about? To hell with back clipping, can't this hot boulder chick climb up there with you and then you guys drink the beer while enjoying the view?

WHY would you want to risk lowering the keg?

What is the girl's name anyway?

And, most importantly, is she one of those beanie wearers?


Partner coylec


Oct 14, 2004, 10:17 PM
Post #100 of 131 (11090 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 12, 2003
Posts: 2024

Re: Back-clipping? [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

because boulderer's can't climb high.

and if she is wearing a beanie, well, :wink: its just a piece of clothing.

coylec

First page Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : Beginners

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook