|
holdeddie
Jun 2, 2006, 5:21 AM
Post #2 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 92
|
amazing
|
|
|
|
|
phaedrus
Jun 2, 2006, 3:21 PM
Post #3 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 24, 2002
Posts: 3046
|
phaedrus moved this thread from General to View this Website.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jun 2, 2006, 4:12 PM
Post #4 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Note the ropes, camera tripod, and shots from above. Quite the "commune with nature."
Check out the story in Outside: http://outside.away.com/...te-arch-climb-1.html
Guess he did TR it several times first. Bunch of jumarring up and down. Then some more times for the cameras. Also, there're clear grooves in the rock, plain as day. Whether they're from his ascents or previous ones is unclear at this point.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
the_mitt
Jun 2, 2006, 4:29 PM
Post #5 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 279
|
(This post was edited by the_mitt on Nov 19, 2006, 6:51 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
clayman
Jun 2, 2006, 5:29 PM
Post #6 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 296
|
yeah..
dean's probably a great guy and all but,
that whole commune with nature thing is so freakin phony baloney it's laughable.
cl
|
|
|
|
|
jabtocrag
Jun 3, 2006, 3:15 AM
Post #7 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 22, 2003
Posts: 476
|
In reply to: Note the ropes, camera tripod, and shots from above. Quite the "commune with nature." Check out the story in Outside: http://outside.away.com/...te-arch-climb-1.html Guess he did TR it several times first. Bunch of jumarring up and down. Then some more times for the cameras. Also, there're clear grooves in the rock, plain as day. Whether they're from his ascents or previous ones is unclear at this point. GO
Good article. So was that statement at the end Dean's "unforced apology"??
|
|
|
|
|
guangzhou
Jun 5, 2006, 7:34 AM
Post #8 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
A slap in the face of anyone who fights to keep access to climbing areas open.
|
|
|
|
|
t-dog
Deleted
Jun 5, 2006, 7:56 AM
Post #9 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
hmm, has the link come up dead for anyone else?
|
|
|
|
|
el_guapo
Jun 5, 2006, 12:36 PM
Post #10 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 23, 2005
Posts: 53
|
In reply to: A slap in the face of anyone who fights to keep access to climbing areas open.
what he said!
|
|
|
|
|
rhythm164
Jun 5, 2006, 12:44 PM
Post #11 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 964
|
Yup.
|
|
|
|
|
rhythm164
Jun 5, 2006, 12:45 PM
Post #12 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 28, 2005
Posts: 964
|
In reply to: hmm, has the link come up dead for anyone else?
Yup.
|
|
|
|
|
feanor007
Jun 5, 2006, 1:56 PM
Post #14 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 7, 2004
Posts: 377
|
In reply to: hmm, has the link come up dead for anyone else? |
|
|
|
|
boardline22
Jun 5, 2006, 2:04 PM
Post #15 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 652
|
the link is also dead for me
|
|
|
|
|
slimper
Jun 5, 2006, 2:12 PM
Post #16 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 25, 2006
Posts: 83
|
Oh come on you guys don't have video equipment, ropes, 4 people jugging lines, people bringing you coffee, snacks, and cell phones when you commune with nature? Huuuummmm. come to think of it me neither, weird.
Shame is the only thing he communed with that day I just don't think he gets it yet.
|
|
|
|
|
craftedpacket
Jun 5, 2006, 2:17 PM
Post #17 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 9, 2004
Posts: 187
|
Anyone have another link to the video or a saved copy?
|
|
|
|
|
boardline22
Jun 6, 2006, 4:19 PM
Post #18 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 18, 2005
Posts: 652
|
yeah I would at least like to see what he did.
|
|
|
|
|
clayman
Jun 6, 2006, 4:34 PM
Post #19 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 20, 2004
Posts: 296
|
yeah, it's not working anymore, don't know why. But there was a great shot of Dean talking, with the fixed line hanging down the arch behind him.
|
|
|
|
|
ullr
Jun 6, 2006, 4:43 PM
Post #20 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 29, 2004
Posts: 338
|
In reply to: yeah, it's not working anymore, don't know why.
Steve probably exceeded his bandwidth, with all the traffic over here from it's posting.
I could probably get it from him, and repost the "one with nature" bullshit.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jun 6, 2006, 5:03 PM
Post #21 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
I'm sure that movie belongs to the TV station that produced and hosted it, so it's up to them if they want to withdraw it.
However, if anyone wants a copy, I'm sure there are folks who have it on their local machines from when they downloaded it. If you send a PM to, for example, some of the folks who posted early in the thread, with your email address, I'm sure they wouldn't mind sending you a copy as long as it's just for your use.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
ullr
Jun 6, 2006, 5:42 PM
Post #22 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 29, 2004
Posts: 338
|
In reply to: I'm sure that movie belongs to the TV station that produced and hosted it, so it's up to them if they want to withdraw it.
Steve was hosting it on his personal website.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jun 6, 2006, 6:39 PM
Post #23 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
Then perhaps I'm confusing it with a different video. Was this the one that was an exclusive piece for a local TV nightly news crew?
GO
|
|
|
|
|
ullr
Jun 6, 2006, 8:26 PM
Post #24 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 29, 2004
Posts: 338
|
In reply to: Then perhaps I'm confusing it with a different video. Was this the one that was an exclusive piece for a local TV nightly news crew? GO
Yes, but he hosted it on his site as well.
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Jun 6, 2006, 9:03 PM
Post #25 of 53
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
In reply to: In reply to: Then perhaps I'm confusing it with a different video. Was this the one that was an exclusive piece for a local TV nightly news crew? GO Yes, but he hosted it on his site as well.
In that case, see what I said above.
GO
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
