Forums: Climbing Information: General:
Climbing ratings
RSS FeedRSS Feeds for General

Premier Sponsor:

 
First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Poll: Climbing ratings
Yosemite DS rating should be the world's standard 14 / 34%
No,  leave each rating the way they are 27 / 66%
41 total votes
 

majid_sabet


Oct 4, 2007, 6:34 PM
Post #1 of 31 (2109 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 13, 2002
Posts: 8390

Climbing ratings
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

The whole world is divided in to KM or Miles, 3/4 of an inch or ... mm but then almost all climbing gear have metric system stamps all over them except climbing ratings.

We still got the UIAA | Yosemite DS |French|Aussie| UK | Saxon |Czech | Nor |Swe |.......rating to deal with


IMO, I say, we should use Yosemite rating for the whole world.


jgloporto


Oct 4, 2007, 6:40 PM
Post #2 of 31 (2100 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2006
Posts: 5522

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
The whole world is divided in to KM or Miles, 3/4 of an inch or ... mm but then almost all climbing gear have metric system stamps all over them except climbing ratings.

We still got the UIAA | Yosemite DS |French|Aussie| UK | Saxon |Czech | Nor |Swe |.......rating to deal with


IMO, I say, we should use Yosemite rating for the whole world.

That's very imperialistic of you!


hopperhopper


Oct 4, 2007, 7:00 PM
Post #3 of 31 (2070 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Posts: 475

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

it would be nice...but never gonna happen.

that's like asking everyone in the world to speak english.


kriso9tails


Oct 4, 2007, 7:09 PM
Post #4 of 31 (2056 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 1, 2001
Posts: 7772

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Y' know, I agree in sentiment, but I think we should all switch to the French scale so it won't fuck up our 8a.nu cards. Then again, how will I be a snotty prick at the gym if I can't confuse people by referring to things with foreign grades?


EPiCJAMES


Oct 4, 2007, 7:15 PM
Post #5 of 31 (2047 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2007
Posts: 391

Re: [hopperhopper] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hopperhopper wrote:
it would be nice...but never gonna happen.

that's like asking everyone in the world to speak english.

wouldn't it be nice... or at least everyone in america speaking english. half of my city speaks spanish!!! no surprise there, i'm sure.


gqsmooth


Oct 4, 2007, 7:19 PM
Post #6 of 31 (2037 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 10, 2005
Posts: 572

Re: [EPiCJAMES] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

you and sharufa should get together and change the whole climbing game as you see fit.

while you are at it, change it so it's no longer called climbing, make it something else. scaling, verticaling, or upping


sed


Oct 4, 2007, 7:28 PM
Post #7 of 31 (2016 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 3, 2003
Posts: 356

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

i think we should switch to my 5 level rating system. here it is, no numbers needed:

walk in the park(5.1-5.5)
A fun romp (5.6-5.8)
Effort (5.9 - 5.10)
Hard (5.11 - 5.12)
Fn Impossible (5.13 - 5.14)

These are the only ratings a person should ever need.


shockabuku


Oct 4, 2007, 7:34 PM
Post #8 of 31 (2002 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [sed] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sed wrote:
i think we should switch to my 5 level rating system. here it is, no numbers needed:

walk in the park(5.1-5.5)
A fun romp (5.6-5.8)
Effort (5.9 - 5.10)
Hard (5.11 - 5.12)
Fn Impossible (5.13 - 5.14)

These are the only ratings a person should ever need.

Bold added for emphasis. Right. Because no one will ever climb 5.15.


shockabuku


Oct 4, 2007, 7:36 PM
Post #9 of 31 (1996 views)
Shortcut

Registered: May 20, 2006
Posts: 4868

Re: [hopperhopper] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

hopperhopper wrote:
that's like asking everyone in the world to speak english.

You mean they don't?


Partner rocdaug


Oct 4, 2007, 7:36 PM
Post #10 of 31 (1994 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 18, 2003
Posts: 220

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

and we should all speak the same language, pray to the same god, eat the same food, wear the same clothes.

gawd, what a boring place! Frown


(This post was edited by rocdaug on Oct 4, 2007, 7:37 PM)


chr1s


Oct 4, 2007, 8:30 PM
Post #11 of 31 (1946 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 30, 2004
Posts: 32

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

 
[Certainly a troll, but that won't stop me raging on the YDS.]

YDS? Surely you're shitting me?

Does anybody here really believe that the YDS is best grading system?

Rating a climb by it's single hardest move (YDS formal definition)- that's bullshit!

A mostly 5.9 climb with one 12a move - should be graded 12a, probably could be climbed by most mid-11 climbers.

A climb that is 100 ft of 12a moves - should be graded 12a, probably couldn't be climbed by a mid-12 climber.

Of course, the current usage of the YDS has deviated from it's original meaning, but still......

The only truly useful grading system (for trad) is the UK one, but that appears to be too complicated for dumb-ass Americans to comprehend.


Partner macherry


Oct 4, 2007, 9:49 PM
Post #12 of 31 (1883 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 15848

Re: [EPiCJAMES] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

EPiCJAMES wrote:
hopperhopper wrote:
it would be nice...but never gonna happen.

that's like asking everyone in the world to speak english.

wouldn't it be nice... or at least everyone in america speaking english. half of my city speaks spanish!!! no surprise there, i'm sure.


where's the smilie emoticon that rolls its eyes.......dammit


chossmonkey


Oct 4, 2007, 9:57 PM
Post #13 of 31 (1870 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 28414

Re: [macherry] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

macherry wrote:
EPiCJAMES wrote:
hopperhopper wrote:
it would be nice...but never gonna happen.

that's like asking everyone in the world to speak english.

wouldn't it be nice... or at least everyone in america speaking english. half of my city speaks spanish!!! no surprise there, i'm sure.


where's the smilie emoticon that rolls its eyes.......dammit
I've got it but I'm not sharing!!!


justroberto


Oct 4, 2007, 10:15 PM
Post #14 of 31 (1845 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [sed] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

sed wrote:
i think we should switch to my 5 level rating system. here it is, no numbers needed:

walk in the park(5.1-5.5)
A fun romp (5.6-5.8)
Effort (5.9 - 5.10)
Hard (5.11 - 5.12)
Fn Impossible (5.13 - 5.14)

These are the only ratings a person should ever need.
oo oo! what about my scale?:

walk in the park(actual walk in the park)
Effort (5.1 to 5.8)
Hard (5.9 to 5.10-)
Fn Impossible (5.9+)


binrat


Oct 4, 2007, 10:57 PM
Post #15 of 31 (1815 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 27, 2006
Posts: 1155

Re: [justroberto] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

I like my way, Yup looks fun, lets do it. "

Binrat


hiyapokey


Oct 5, 2007, 2:07 AM
Post #16 of 31 (1765 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jul 6, 2006
Posts: 315

Re: [shockabuku] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

According to the original Star Trek the whole universe speaks English, at least most of the time. If you watch Hogan's Heroes even Germans speak English with a German accent. I zeee nothink. I hearr nothink.


rjtrials


Oct 5, 2007, 2:20 AM
Post #17 of 31 (1758 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Sep 7, 2002
Posts: 342

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
IMO, I say, we should use
Yosemite rating for the whole world.

The French scale is a much better scale IMO. Same with the Font vs V scale.

Let the French have their day. This is one of the very few things they got right :)


EPiCJAMES


Oct 5, 2007, 2:37 AM
Post #18 of 31 (1743 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 8, 2007
Posts: 391

Re: [rjtrials] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rjtrials wrote:

Let the French have their day. This is one of the very few things they got right :)

nope, french fries are good tooo. hahaha.


rockguide


Oct 5, 2007, 3:02 AM
Post #19 of 31 (1726 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2004
Posts: 1359

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Ditch all grading systems for the Aussie system. Numbers. No letters, no pluses or minuses.

The only psychological barriers at 19/20 and 29/30

B


curt


Oct 5, 2007, 4:32 AM
Post #20 of 31 (1693 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 18275

Re: [majid_sabet] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

majid_sabet wrote:
IMO, I say, we should use Yosemite rating for the whole world.

No fucking way. If we standardized, that would be one less thing we could argue about.

Curt


ClusterFock


Oct 5, 2007, 6:35 AM
Post #21 of 31 (1670 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Jun 29, 2007
Posts: 95

Re: [rockguide] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

rockguide wrote:
Ditch all grading systems for the Aussie system. Numbers. No letters, no pluses or minuses.

The only psychological barriers at 19/20 and 29/30

B

Agreed. Not just because I'm an Aussie but because the grading makes sense. Why the fuck would you use decimal points, plusses, minusses etc for grading?


reverse_dyno


Oct 5, 2007, 11:17 AM
Post #22 of 31 (1628 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Dec 8, 2005
Posts: 69

Re: [ClusterFock] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

Why do we even need ratings? In the olden days people just eye balled a climb and said lets do it.

No ratings would make trad climbing much more interesting.

I am so cheap that I often will not buy a guild to a sport climbing area. Just look up and guess the rating.


justroberto


Oct 5, 2007, 12:20 PM
Post #23 of 31 (1614 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Feb 21, 2006
Posts: 1876

Re: [reverse_dyno] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

reverse_dyno wrote:
I am so cheap that I often will not buy a guild to a sport climbing area.

I wouldn't buy a sport climbing guild either; that would be really expensive.


blueeyedclimber


Oct 5, 2007, 1:21 PM
Post #24 of 31 (1586 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 19, 2002
Posts: 4602

Re: [justroberto] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

This is the only rating system I care about:

G
PG
R
X

Josh


rockguide


Oct 5, 2007, 1:27 PM
Post #25 of 31 (1583 views)
Shortcut

Registered: Nov 8, 2004
Posts: 1359

Re: [justroberto] Climbing ratings [In reply to]
Report this Post
Average: avg_1 avg_2 avg_3 avg_4 avg_5 (0 ratings)  
Can't Post

justroberto wrote:
reverse_dyno wrote:
I am so cheap that I often will not buy a guild to a sport climbing area.

I wouldn't buy a sport climbing guild either; that would be really expensive.

They wouldn't be expensive to feed though. Wink

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All

Forums : Climbing Information : General

 


Search for (options)

Log In:

Username:
Password: Remember me:

Go Register
Go Lost Password?



Follow us on Twiter Become a Fan on Facebook