|
tradrenn
Dec 11, 2009, 6:13 AM
Post #1376 of 1722
(16749 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
ingrahamd wrote: I can't agree with you more on the passive gear! Even though it's only been a little while since I started, I'll take a solid nut over a cam anyday! haha I'm glad that you will take a nut over cam. the "haha" part was a bit stupid. V.
|
|
|
|
|
malcolm777b
Dec 11, 2009, 7:12 AM
Post #1377 of 1722
(16729 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2009
Posts: 204
|
cracklover wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: jakedatc wrote: dmm aluminum offsets in the middle sizes would be my next passive addition. Don't bother, it's been scientifically proven that the #9 is completely unplacable. I wouldn't be surprised if the other are useless too. ^^^ inside joke. GO That doesn't sound like an inside joke. I climb with a set of DMM Offsets, and for some reason, that red #9 gets placed on EVERY SINGLE PITCH when I rack them. Best single piece of gear out there.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 11, 2009, 4:42 PM
Post #1378 of 1722
(16692 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
malcolm777b wrote: cracklover wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: jakedatc wrote: dmm aluminum offsets in the middle sizes would be my next passive addition. Don't bother, it's been scientifically proven that the #9 is completely unplacable. I wouldn't be surprised if the other are useless too. ^^^ inside joke. GO That doesn't sound like an inside joke. I climb with a set of DMM Offsets, and for some reason, that red #9 gets placed on EVERY SINGLE PITCH when I rack them. Best single piece of gear out there. If you dare: http://www.rockclimbing.com/..._reply;so=ASC;mh=25;
|
|
|
|
|
cracklover
Dec 11, 2009, 5:48 PM
Post #1379 of 1722
(16672 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
malcolm777b wrote: cracklover wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: jakedatc wrote: dmm aluminum offsets in the middle sizes would be my next passive addition. Don't bother, it's been scientifically proven that the #9 is completely unplacable. I wouldn't be surprised if the other are useless too. ^^^ inside joke. GO That doesn't sound like an inside joke. I climb with a set of DMM Offsets, and for some reason, that red #9 gets placed on EVERY SINGLE PITCH when I rack them. Best single piece of gear out there. You do know what the phrase "inside joke" means, right? GO
|
|
|
|
|
caughtinside
Dec 11, 2009, 5:52 PM
Post #1380 of 1722
(16669 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 8, 2003
Posts: 30603
|
tradrenn wrote: ingrahamd wrote: I can't agree with you more on the passive gear! Even though it's only been a little while since I started, I'll take a solid nut over a cam anyday! haha I'm glad that you will take a nut over cam. the "haha" part was a bit stupid. V. This was a great post, and a great reply. haha!
|
|
|
|
|
malcolm777b
Dec 11, 2009, 7:38 PM
Post #1381 of 1722
(16648 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2009
Posts: 204
|
cracklover wrote: malcolm777b wrote: cracklover wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: jakedatc wrote: dmm aluminum offsets in the middle sizes would be my next passive addition. Don't bother, it's been scientifically proven that the #9 is completely unplacable. I wouldn't be surprised if the other are useless too. ^^^ inside joke. GO That doesn't sound like an inside joke. I climb with a set of DMM Offsets, and for some reason, that red #9 gets placed on EVERY SINGLE PITCH when I rack them. Best single piece of gear out there. You do know what the phrase "inside joke" means, right? GO Of course I know what that phrase means. One of my partners and I have a running joke that a rack of #9s would get you up any pitch (and places it wherever he can get it, if he needs it or not). That's why I said "that doesn't SOUND like an inside joke". I assumed, due to what sounded like a similar joke between myself and a climbing partner (strangely regarding the exact same nut), that the joke was pretty much the same. If it has to do with the thread of HB vs DMM, then I was wrong. My bad.
(This post was edited by malcolm777b on Dec 11, 2009, 7:39 PM)
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Dec 11, 2009, 8:06 PM
Post #1382 of 1722
(16637 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
malcolm777b wrote: cracklover wrote: malcolm777b wrote: cracklover wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: jakedatc wrote: dmm aluminum offsets in the middle sizes would be my next passive addition. Don't bother, it's been scientifically proven that the #9 is completely unplacable. I wouldn't be surprised if the other are useless too. ^^^ inside joke. GO That doesn't sound like an inside joke. I climb with a set of DMM Offsets, and for some reason, that red #9 gets placed on EVERY SINGLE PITCH when I rack them. Best single piece of gear out there. You do know what the phrase "inside joke" means, right? GO Of course I know what that phrase means. One of my partners and I have a running joke that a rack of #9s would get you up any pitch (and places it wherever he can get it, if he needs it or not). That's why I said "that doesn't SOUND like an inside joke". I assumed, due to what sounded like a similar joke between myself and a climbing partner (strangely regarding the exact same nut), that the joke was pretty much the same. If it has to do with the thread of HB vs DMM, then I was wrong. My bad. ding ding. just GU'd that thread. freaking hilarious
|
|
|
|
|
tradrenn
Dec 13, 2009, 3:20 AM
Post #1383 of 1722
(16568 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jan 16, 2005
Posts: 2990
|
caughtinside wrote: tradrenn wrote: ingrahamd wrote: I can't agree with you more on the passive gear! Even though it's only been a little while since I started, I'll take a solid nut over a cam anyday! haha I'm glad that you will take a nut over cam. the "haha" part was a bit stupid. V. This was a great post, and a great reply. haha! Where are me stars then ? Damnass, haha.
|
|
|
|
|
currupt4130
Dec 17, 2009, 2:09 AM
Post #1384 of 1722
(16474 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 515
|
Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams.
(This post was edited by currupt4130 on Dec 17, 2009, 2:11 AM)
|
Attachments:
|
DSC02468.JPG
(146 KB)
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 17, 2009, 2:14 AM
Post #1385 of 1722
(16468 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 17, 2009, 2:16 AM
Post #1386 of 1722
(16464 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. And although I appreciate leaving your shoes, harness and headlamp out of the picture, you're pushing it with that NRG guide there buddy. How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 17, 2009, 2:17 AM
Post #1387 of 1722
(16462 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. [image] http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4424;[/image] How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion. And although I appreciate leaving your shoes, harness and headlamp out of the picture, you're pushing it with that NRG guide there buddy. I sure titted that one up.
|
|
|
|
|
currupt4130
Dec 17, 2009, 2:17 AM
Post #1388 of 1722
(16462 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 515
|
It's good. Out here in the east there are lots of these pod things that you can jam it in and tie off to. If you look close there's a can of Cope too. Right next to the track ball. Now that's a specialty piece...
|
|
|
|
|
currupt4130
Dec 17, 2009, 2:18 AM
Post #1389 of 1722
(16458 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 515
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. [image] http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4424;[/image] How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion. And although I appreciate leaving your shoes, harness and headlamp out of the picture, you're pushing it with that NRG guide there buddy. I sure titted that one up. Yea that guide is only for getting route descriptions to go with Caters book. It was sitting on my desk and it's so worthless I didn't notice it. Sorry. I can burn both Thompsons and Caters here in a couple months.
(This post was edited by currupt4130 on Dec 17, 2009, 2:19 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Dec 17, 2009, 5:13 AM
Post #1390 of 1722
(16415 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. [image] http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4424;[/image] How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion. And although I appreciate leaving your shoes, harness and headlamp out of the picture, you're pushing it with that NRG guide there buddy. I sure titted that one up. mmmm..... bombay sapphire.
|
|
|
|
|
Arrogant_Bastard
Dec 17, 2009, 4:48 PM
Post #1391 of 1722
(16344 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 31, 2007
Posts: 19994
|
dr_feelgood wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. [image] http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4424;[/image] How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion. And although I appreciate leaving your shoes, harness and headlamp out of the picture, you're pushing it with that NRG guide there buddy. I sure titted that one up. mmmm..... bombay sapphire. Shut yer trap! It's quarter to 9 in the morning, I do not need these reminders.
|
|
|
|
|
dr_feelgood
Dec 17, 2009, 5:28 PM
Post #1392 of 1722
(16326 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 6, 2004
Posts: 26060
|
Arrogant_Bastard wrote: dr_feelgood wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: Arrogant_Bastard wrote: currupt4130 wrote: Recently updated, well within the last year. Doubles from .5-4 on C4's, doubles on gray, green and yellow aliens, singles on red, blue and black and a green WC zero. Double set of nuts, 14 shoulder length draws, 2 double length, and one 12"er. Taped up the tri cams. [image] http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_attachment;postatt_id=4424;[/image] How do you like the Logitech trackball? I find it to be a niche piece and just don't find enough placements for it to warrant racking it on a regular occasion. And although I appreciate leaving your shoes, harness and headlamp out of the picture, you're pushing it with that NRG guide there buddy. I sure titted that one up. mmmm..... bombay sapphire. Shut yer trap! It's quarter to 9 in the morning, I do not need these reminders. weee bit of a headache, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
sethg
Dec 17, 2009, 5:53 PM
Post #1393 of 1722
(16318 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2006
Posts: 134
|
Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams?
|
|
|
|
|
subantz
Dec 17, 2009, 6:15 PM
Post #1394 of 1722
(16304 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 7, 2007
Posts: 1247
|
sethg wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams? Easy answer, but I am not telling. Sit down and think about it. His Tricams dont need Viagra. HINT HINT
|
|
|
|
|
currupt4130
Dec 17, 2009, 6:18 PM
Post #1395 of 1722
(16303 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 7, 2008
Posts: 515
|
sethg wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams? Ever try having sex and not being able to keep it up? That's what placing a tri cam is like one handed half the time.
|
|
|
|
|
johnwesely
Dec 17, 2009, 7:16 PM
Post #1396 of 1722
(16274 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 13, 2006
Posts: 5360
|
currupt4130 wrote: sethg wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams? Ever try having sex and not being able to keep it up? That's what placing a tri cam is like one handed half the time. The solution is to tape your junk?
|
|
|
|
|
cush
Dec 17, 2009, 7:36 PM
Post #1397 of 1722
(16261 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 2, 2008
Posts: 320
|
currupt4130 wrote: sethg wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams? Ever try having sex and not being able to keep it up? That's what placing a tri cam is like one handed half the time. that's freaking brilliant! i like that idea a lot. i'm going to tape one of my tricams to try that out when i get home today
|
|
|
|
|
the_climber
Dec 17, 2009, 8:20 PM
Post #1398 of 1722
(16234 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 9, 2003
Posts: 6142
|
sethg wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams? Proficiency in placing tricams negates the need in the same way that many believe wired hexes are easier to place compared to slung hexes. Slung hexes are more versatile, and tricams are better as they are produced, without a stiffened sling. Some will disagree with me.
|
|
|
|
|
jakedatc
Dec 17, 2009, 8:22 PM
Post #1399 of 1722
(16231 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 12, 2003
Posts: 11054
|
cush wrote: currupt4130 wrote: sethg wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but why all the tape on the tricams? Ever try having sex and not being able to keep it up? That's what placing a tri cam is like one handed half the time. that's freaking brilliant! i like that idea a lot. i'm going to tape one of my tricams to try that out when i get home today where are you placing tricams that you need it stiffer (cept for passive above your head) ? i just put it between my index and middle fingers
|
|
|
|
|
sethg
Dec 17, 2009, 8:36 PM
Post #1400 of 1722
(18294 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 9, 2006
Posts: 134
|
Interesting. I love tricams: haven't seen that done to them in the Gunks. I can't say I've ever needed the sling to be stiffer but maybe I'll try it with one.
|
|
|
|
|
|