 |

lithiummetalman
Jan 4, 2012, 1:15 AM
Post #51 of 89
(11550 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 28, 2004
Posts: 286
|
Suck it up, you got to go climbing in the end. And that's what counts! End of story.
(This post was edited by lithiummetalman on Jan 4, 2012, 1:15 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

jt512
Jan 4, 2012, 1:24 AM
Post #52 of 89
(11542 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 12, 2001
Posts: 21904
|
camhead wrote: jt512 wrote: camhead wrote: jt512 wrote: camhead wrote: I almost failed the belay test on a grigri at the Ohio State University climbing wall, because I did not put both hands on the brake side of the rope when I was moving them up. Gyms can have a lot of various, contrived, stupid rules. That's not contrived. With the original grigri you should always be holding the brake side of the rope firmly. That means to slide your brake hand up the rope you need to grasp the brake side of the rope with your other hand or use pinch-and-slide method. With the Grigri 2 there is probably less need to constantly maintain such a firm grip on the brake side of the rope. Jay Pinch and slide was irrelevant here, because it was a toprope belay test. Irrelevant for toprope? When my partner is moving quickly on TR, I just about always use the pinch-and-slide belay method with any belay device. When you say "pinch" you mean "pinch the brake," no? Why on earth would you ever have to do that while TR belaying? I'm talking about the venerable "pinch-and-slide" belay technique, where, after taking in an armful of rope you do the following: slide your guide hand back up the climber's side of the rope, position the strands of the rope parallel in front of you, pinch the brake strand lightly between the thumb and index finger of the guide hand above the brake hand, slide your brake hand down the brake side of the rope, release the pinch, and then bring the brake side of the rope back down to whatever position you keep it in (locked off for most n00bs). Whether you're TR belaying or lead belaying, the only time you have to do the pinch maneuver using the pinch-and-slide method is when you want to take in rope. Since, when you're TR belaying, you're mostly taking in rope, you do a lot more pinching when TR belaying than when lead belaying. I'm not sure what you're confused about. If your question is why would you have to do the pinch maneuver while TR belaying with a Grigri, it is because, after you've taken in some slack, it is potentially dangerous to shuffle your brake hand back up the brake side of the rope. You can't maintain a constantly firm grip on the brake side of the rope while shuffling your brake hand up the rope. If the climber falls at an inopportune moment, and the grigri doesn't lock up, then the climber may fall too far before you have a chance to tighten your grip on the rope. The Grigri is more likely not to lock up in response to a TR fall than a lead fall, which is more likely to produce the shock force needed to lock up the Grigri, even with a skinny or slick rope. As I mentioned before, I think this is more an issue with the original Grigri than the Grigri 2, which seems to lock up more reliably, obviating the need to constantly maintain such a firm grip on the brake side of the rope. Jay
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Jan 4, 2012, 1:40 AM
Post #53 of 89
(11536 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
j_ung wrote: Regarding gym rules being dictated by insurance companies... In my gym experience, which is extensive but admittedly potentially out of date, insurance companies that dictate specific gym rules are a myth. What I have seen are insurance companies that require gyms to have risk-management plans (including rules) and that they follow them. But those plans are typically written by the gym itself, not the insurance company. Wait, what, you mean that people make up rules and justify them with an invisible, unaccountable authority figure? Just wait until my friends over in the soap box hear of this. They will be outraged! To the OP. Relax, you should always be more respectful and questioning then you need. It is OK to be mildly funny (Last belay test, I asked if I use the pirate version of the comands - he laughed and said no.) I asked the person giving the tests more questions than he asked me and I passed with flying colors. When I return to that place, I will again begin my habit of bribing the gym workers - the real secret to getting what you want.
|
|
|
 |
 |

lena_chita
Moderator
Jan 4, 2012, 5:09 PM
Post #54 of 89
(11500 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 27, 2006
Posts: 6087
|
Sounds like you got your answer, already, but I'll add my own 'gyms can require things to be done THEIR way' stories. 1. A guy comes to visit from out of town. He says hello to the employee at the counter. It so happens that the two guys know each other, have run into each other while climbing outside many times, and the employee happens to know that the visitor has 10+ years of climbing experience. Nevertheless, the employee proceeds to belay test the visitor, requires him to use an ATC, and insists on the visitor tying in with a figure 8+double fisherman, even though the visitor always uses double bowline with a re-thread, and the employee knows how to tie double-fisherman and never objects to anyone tying in that way when climbing outside. Sounds silly-- but this is a case of employee going by the book. And you can't really fault him for it, even though it is silly. 2. I am setting a TR route at the gym, using a gri-gri for self-belay (which is the standard gym-approved method). When I am done, a friend comes along, and I ask him to quickly run up the new route and give me feedback. He agrees, and I put him on belay with the gri-gri, because, well, I have it handy, while the ATC is in my bag. I get reprimanded for using a gri-gri to TR belay, because the gym requires everyone to belay with an ATC. The justification is that, while they know I can use a gri-gri, someone else might see me belaying with a gri-gri, and that would create a precedent and then maybe someone else would want to do the same, and gym rules say ATC only. Silly, for sure. But... gym has rules. Got to stick with them if you want to climb there.
|
|
|
 |
 |

notapplicable
Jan 4, 2012, 5:36 PM
Post #55 of 89
(11495 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 31, 2006
Posts: 17771
|
B.S. method Fo Lyfe!
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jan 5, 2012, 3:03 AM
Post #56 of 89
(11465 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
lena_chita wrote: Sounds like you got your answer, already, but I'll add my own 'gyms can require things to be done THEIR way' stories. 1. A guy comes to visit from out of town. He says hello to the employee at the counter. It so happens that the two guys know each other, have run into each other while climbing outside many times, and the employee happens to know that the visitor has 10+ years of climbing experience. Nevertheless, the employee proceeds to belay test the visitor, requires him to use an ATC, and insists on the visitor tying in with a figure 8+double fisherman, even though the visitor always uses double bowline with a re-thread, and the employee knows how to tie double-fisherman and never objects to anyone tying in that way when climbing outside. Sounds silly-- but this is a case of employee going by the book. And you can't really fault him for it, even though it is silly. Most likely to cover him and the gym's @#$%^ if anything does happen. I was once given a belay test by a climbing gym staff when I was there to teach a self rescue clinic. The clinic was half day to staff and two half days to their members. Before I could teach, I had to pass the top-rope test and the lead test too.
In reply to: 2. I am setting a TR route at the gym, using a gri-gri for self-belay (which is the standard gym-approved method). When I am done, a friend comes along, and I ask him to quickly run up the new route and give me feedback. He agrees, and I put him on belay with the gri-gri, because, well, I have it handy, while the ATC is in my bag. I get reprimanded for using a gri-gri to TR belay, because the gym requires everyone to belay with an ATC. The justification is that, while they know I can use a gri-gri, someone else might see me belaying with a gri-gri, and that would create a precedent and then maybe someone else would want to do the same, and gym rules say ATC only. Silly, for sure. But... gym has rules. Got to stick with them if you want to climb there. I have to agree on setting precedence to be honest.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jan 5, 2012, 4:06 AM
Post #58 of 89
(11457 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
j_ung wrote: guangzhou wrote: I have to agree on setting precedence to be honest. Sure, if it's for something that makes sense. Setting precedence makes sense to me. I can only guess, but the gym most likely wants to avoid the gri gri as much as possible because it flattens their ropes. As someone who owns a gym, I can honestly say, "why can he do it and not me" is a very common phrase. It's easier to enforce the rules with everyone versus selectively.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Jan 5, 2012, 8:51 PM
Post #60 of 89
(11410 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
guangzhou wrote: j_ung wrote: guangzhou wrote: I have to agree on setting precedence to be honest. Sure, if it's for something that makes sense. Setting precedence makes sense to me. I can only guess, but the gym most likely wants to avoid the gri gri as much as possible because it flattens their ropes. As someone who owns a gym, I can honestly say, "why can he do it and not me" is a very common phrase. It's easier to enforce the rules with everyone versus selectively. Perhaps the root of the problem is the rule structure itself. I have 10 years of experience managing gyms in which customers could use whatever device they like, as long as they did so correctly. No offense, but apparently our approach was more effective at reducing such questions than yours. I rarely had to field them. And when I did, since our rules were well thought out, they were easy to justify. As for flat ropes from Gri-gri usage, I found that the natural variety of belay devices people employed solved the problem for us. Now requiring only Gri-gris... I could see flat ropes becoming an issue. But that's an example of another rule with which I disagree.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jan 6, 2012, 2:15 AM
Post #61 of 89
(11383 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
j_ung wrote: guangzhou wrote: j_ung wrote: guangzhou wrote: I have to agree on setting precedence to be honest. Sure, if it's for something that makes sense. Setting precedence makes sense to me. I can only guess, but the gym most likely wants to avoid the gri gri as much as possible because it flattens their ropes. As someone who owns a gym, I can honestly say, "why can he do it and not me" is a very common phrase. It's easier to enforce the rules with everyone versus selectively. Perhaps the root of the problem is the rule structure itself. I have 10 years of experience managing gyms in which customers could use whatever device they like, as long as they did so correctly. No offense, but apparently our approach was more effective at reducing such questions than yours. I rarely had to field them. And when I did, since our rules were well thought out, they were easy to justify. We have no one belay device or other rule in the gyms I own. Gri-Gri or ATC type doesn't matter to me. What I was commenting on was setting precedence. We enforce the rules equally with everyone so no-one can complain. If we had ano gri-gri rule, we would enforce that too. We don't allow belaying on mutter hitch or figure eights, beyond that we're pretty open if you can demonstrate you know how to use the device in question.
In reply to: As for flat ropes from Gri-gri usage, I found that the natural variety of belay devices people employed solved the problem for us. Now requiring only Gri-gris... I could see flat ropes becoming an issue. But that's an example of another rule with which I disagree. Flat ropes are part of life in gyms. We d what we can, but any gym in business should know that ropes don't last for ever and budget accordingly.
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jan 7, 2012, 10:48 AM
Post #63 of 89
(11316 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
j_ung wrote: guangzhou wrote: Flat ropes are part of life in gyms. We d what we can, but any gym in business should know that ropes don't last for ever and budget accordingly. Now that I agree with. hard not to agree with it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Toast_in_the_Machine
Jan 8, 2012, 6:18 PM
Post #64 of 89
(11273 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 12, 2008
Posts: 5208
|
guangzhou wrote: j_ung wrote: guangzhou wrote: Flat ropes are part of life in gyms. We d what we can, but any gym in business should know that ropes don't last for ever and budget accordingly. Now that I agree with. hard not to agree with it.  This is the interwebs, somewhere there is someone who disagrees.
|
|
|
 |
 |

calvo
Jan 15, 2012, 7:47 AM
Post #65 of 89
(11155 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2011
Posts: 25
|
guangzhou wrote: Flat ropes are part of life in gyms. We d what we can, but any gym in business should know that ropes don't last for ever and budget accordingly. I disagree
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Jan 16, 2012, 6:07 PM
Post #66 of 89
(11116 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
calvo wrote: guangzhou wrote: Flat ropes are part of life in gyms. We d what we can, but any gym in business should know that ropes don't last for ever and budget accordingly. I disagree With which part?
|
|
|
 |
 |

calvo
Jan 16, 2012, 6:22 PM
Post #67 of 89
(11111 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2011
Posts: 25
|
j_ung wrote: calvo wrote: guangzhou wrote: Flat ropes are part of life in gyms. We d what we can, but any gym in business should know that ropes don't last for ever and budget accordingly. I disagree With which part? Just kidding
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jan 17, 2012, 1:59 AM
Post #68 of 89
(11088 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
The real question for gyms is when to retire a flat rope isn't it.
|
|
|
 |
 |

calvo
Jan 17, 2012, 3:59 AM
Post #69 of 89
(11072 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2011
Posts: 25
|
I read somewhere on here about ropes and like the maximum number of falls they can take. And someone mentioned that like if you like rest a rope after a fall for a while it will stay stronger in the long run. If this indeed works I fail to see how it would happen. Because the stressed fibers wouldn't bend themselves? I'd its a bit late, not sure if that question made sense..
|
|
|
 |
 |

acorneau
Jan 17, 2012, 5:35 AM
Post #70 of 89
(11062 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
calvo wrote: I read somewhere on here about ropes and like the maximum number of falls they can take. And someone mentioned that like if you like rest a rope after a fall for a while it will stay stronger in the long run. If this indeed works I fail to see how it would happen. Because the stressed fibers wouldn't bend themselves? I'd its a bit late, not sure if that question made sense.. No, not much sense, but I'm pretty sure you're referring to this article from the QC lab guys at BD... http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/...o-rest-between-falls Also, I think you're confusing the UIAA rating for "number of falls held" with standard falls in real-world climbing situations.
(This post was edited by acorneau on Jan 17, 2012, 5:36 AM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

calvo
Jan 17, 2012, 5:55 AM
Post #71 of 89
(11060 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2011
Posts: 25
|
Yea that one. What I meant was like, in relation to the rope flattening .. would resting it periodically .. or like switching out the ropes to allow then to rest result in longer lifespan for your ropes? Like would they regain strength after a period of non-usage? BTW I am in no hurry to start my own gym, I'm a curious noob
|
|
|
 |
 |

guangzhou
Jan 17, 2012, 6:27 AM
Post #72 of 89
(11050 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: 3389
|
Just because a rope is flat doesn't mean it's weak. As the owner of a gym, I plan to err on the side of caution. I prefer to change the ropes out earlier than necessary rather than later.
|
|
|
 |
 |

theextremist04
Jan 17, 2012, 6:33 AM
Post #73 of 89
(11049 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2010
Posts: 189
|
Ropes going flat is usually more of a handling problem than a safety issue. The gym I work at (at my college) doesn't ever feel like budgeting for new ropes, so a lot of ours are flat. I still take falls on them, but they suck to run through belay devices.
|
|
|
 |
 |

calvo
Jan 17, 2012, 12:53 PM
Post #74 of 89
(11023 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 31, 2011
Posts: 25
|
Ohh, yea I just assumed flattening weakened the ropes. I can see how that could be a problem especially when you have guys like me who are unfamiliar with the quirks of working with flattened ropes no?
|
|
|
 |
 |

theextremist04
Jan 17, 2012, 2:41 PM
Post #75 of 89
(11014 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 24, 2010
Posts: 189
|
The ropes do end up weaker for sure, but not to the point where top roping is dangerous on them.
|
|
|
 |
|
|