 |

jam3s_
Jan 9, 2012, 7:42 PM
Post #1 of 27
(12030 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 4, 2011
Posts: 6
|
Hello All May sound like a stupid question however is it best to thread downwards or upwards through the harness when tieying in with the double figure 8? Ive noticed most people and my previous instructor seem to thread the rope upwards however my latest instructor said this was wrong and should always thread the rope from top down ( top loop first), Thanks James
|
|
|
 |
 |

TarHeelEMT
Jan 9, 2012, 7:58 PM
Post #2 of 27
(12009 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 20, 2009
Posts: 724
|
For all practical purposes, it doesn't matter.
|
|
|
 |
 |

Greggle
Jan 9, 2012, 8:08 PM
Post #3 of 27
(11995 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 27, 2010
Posts: 228
|
jam3s_ wrote: Hello All May sound like a stupid question however is it best to thread downwards or upwards through the harness when tieying in with the double figure 8? Ive noticed most people and my previous instructor seem to thread the rope upwards however my latest instructor said this was wrong and should always thread the rope from top down ( top loop first), Thanks James Enjoy...
|
|
|
 |
 |

dagibbs
Jan 9, 2012, 8:41 PM
Post #4 of 27
(11969 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 1, 2007
Posts: 921
|
As the previous responder said, mostly it doesn't matter. One can argue that if, while threading, you only catch one of the two loops you need to thread, you're most likely to catch the first one, and if you're going to fall with only one loop threaded, you're better it be the top one, since it will keep you upright, while if it is the bottom, you are more likely to invert, making the fall riskier.
|
|
|
 |
 |

bearbreeder
Jan 9, 2012, 8:43 PM
Post #5 of 27
(11967 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 2, 2009
Posts: 1960
|
either way will hold HOWEVER .. should you miss one loop ... and yr partner miss it on the check .. youd much rather have it threaded through the top loop first if you had threaded through only the bottom loop only ... theres a very good chance youll invert with a fall ive actually caught this several times with people this last season ... so now i always tie in top loop down and teach beginners the same way ... in short it doesnt matter unless you miss a loop
|
|
|
 |
 |

jeepnphreak
Jan 9, 2012, 8:52 PM
Post #6 of 27
(11956 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 29, 2008
Posts: 1259
|
It a loop, it does not matter. Just be sure to get BOTH upper and lower tie in points.
|
|
|
 |
 |

meanandugly
Jan 9, 2012, 9:58 PM
Post #7 of 27
(11905 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 20, 2004
Posts: 312
|
It really doesn't matter, but as was stated before 'down thru' and if you only catch the top one then inversion is unlikely. But when you tie down thru and you untie and go to pull the rope out of your harness the potential is there for the end of the rope to whip you in the genitals on the way by....think about it. ;)
|
|
|
 |
 |

jam3s_
Jan 9, 2012, 10:15 PM
Post #8 of 27
(11894 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 4, 2011
Posts: 6
|
Thank you all for you help,
(This post was edited by jam3s_ on Jan 9, 2012, 10:16 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Jan 16, 2012, 6:15 PM
Post #9 of 27
(11649 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
jam3s_ wrote: Hello All May sound like a stupid question however is it best to thread downwards or upwards through the harness when tieying in with the double figure 8? Ive noticed most people and my previous instructor seem to thread the rope upwards however my latest instructor said this was wrong and should always thread the rope from top down ( top loop first), Thanks James
 Your instructor sounds like a moron.
|
|
|
 |
 |

cclarke
Jan 17, 2012, 2:50 AM
Post #10 of 27
(11577 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 160
|
Well, it obviously depends on the hemisphere in which you are climbing given the coriolis effect. Just remember to thread your rope toward the equator. So, in the US, it's down and, in South America, it's up.
|
|
|
 |
 |

crjanow
Jan 22, 2012, 10:00 PM
Post #12 of 27
(11319 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 18, 2008
Posts: 69
|
wait you mean you dont run the rope around your waist through those loops on your harness?
|
|
|
 |
 |

sungam
Jan 23, 2012, 8:23 AM
Post #13 of 27
(11246 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
cclarke wrote: Well, it obviously depends on the hemisphere in which you are climbing given the coriolis effect. Just remember to thread your rope toward the equator. So, in the US, it's down and, in South America, it's up. Sorry, bro, but it's time for you to take a look back at dynamics and relativity. You gotta check which hemisphere you are in AND what direction you are facing.
|
|
|
 |
 |

tH1e-swiN1e
Jan 23, 2012, 6:17 PM
Post #14 of 27
(11203 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 28, 2011
Posts: 192
|
Who uses a rope?
|
|
|
 |
 |

GeckoBat
Jan 24, 2012, 12:48 AM
Post #15 of 27
(11175 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 11, 2011
Posts: 46
|
jam3s_ wrote: ...my latest instructor said this was wrong and should always thread the rope from top down ( top loop first), Thanks James Your latest instructor needs to clarify why it's "wrong". Several of my friends recently took a course and the same thing happened in their course. The instructor told them to always thread through the top but failed to explain why.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Jan 24, 2012, 1:09 PM
Post #16 of 27
(11119 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
GeckoBat wrote: jam3s_ wrote: ...my latest instructor said this was wrong and should always thread the rope from top down ( top loop first), Thanks James Your latest instructor needs to clarify why it's "wrong". Several of my friends recently took a course and the same thing happened in their course. The instructor told them to always thread through the top but failed to explain why. I suspect its for the reason above, that threading from the top at least gets you the swami, which is probably better than getting just the crotch connector. It's still worthless advice, though, since you can start from the top and still miss the swami just fine.
|
|
|
 |
 |

USnavy
Jan 24, 2012, 3:01 PM
Post #17 of 27
(11082 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 6, 2007
Posts: 2667
|
TarHeelEMT wrote: For all practical purposes I think you are the first person I have seen ever get this right. Even MIT alumni and MythBusters star Adam Savage gets this one wrong all the time. "For all intensive purposes..."
(This post was edited by USnavy on Jan 24, 2012, 3:01 PM)
|
|
|
 |
 |

acorneau
Jan 24, 2012, 3:50 PM
Post #18 of 27
(11068 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Feb 6, 2008
Posts: 2889
|
USnavy wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: For all practical purposes I think you are the first person I have seen ever get this right. Even MIT alumni and MythBusters star Adam Savage gets this one wrong all the time. "For all intensive purposes..." "For all intents and purposes..."
|
|
|
 |
 |

sp115
Jan 24, 2012, 4:25 PM
Post #19 of 27
(11053 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
acorneau wrote: USnavy wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: For all practical purposes I think you are the first person I have seen ever get this right. Even MIT alumni and MythBusters star Adam Savage gets this one wrong all the time. "For all intensive purposes..." "For all intents and purposes..." ^^ Yup. Now let's move on to the phrase "begs the question". I'll probably have a stroke if I come across that used properly.
|
|
|
 |
 |

j_ung
Jan 24, 2012, 7:13 PM
Post #20 of 27
(11019 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 21, 2003
Posts: 18690
|
sp115 wrote: acorneau wrote: USnavy wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: For all practical purposes I think you are the first person I have seen ever get this right. Even MIT alumni and MythBusters star Adam Savage gets this one wrong all the time. "For all intensive purposes..." "For all intents and purposes..." ^^ Yup. Now let's move on to the phrase "begs the question". I'll probably have a stroke if I come across that used properly. I would of liked to have seen that used correctly.
|
|
|
 |
 |

sungam
Jan 24, 2012, 7:48 PM
Post #21 of 27
(11003 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 24, 2004
Posts: 26804
|
sp115 wrote: acorneau wrote: USnavy wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: For all practical purposes I think you are the first person I have seen ever get this right. Even MIT alumni and MythBusters star Adam Savage gets this one wrong all the time. "For all intensive purposes..." "For all intents and purposes..." ^^ Yup. Now let's move on to the phrase "begs the question". I'll probably have a stroke if I come across that used properly. A whole nother thing? Dafaq is a "nother"?
|
|
|
 |
 |

cracklover
Jan 24, 2012, 8:04 PM
Post #22 of 27
(10996 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
sp115 wrote: acorneau wrote: USnavy wrote: TarHeelEMT wrote: For all practical purposes I think you are the first person I have seen ever get this right. Even MIT alumni and MythBusters star Adam Savage gets this one wrong all the time. "For all intensive purposes..." "For all intents and purposes..." ^^ Yup. Now let's move on to the phrase "begs the question". I'll probably have a stroke if I come across that used properly. So wait - when you argue that no-one uses "beggging the question" properly simply based on your own assumption that no-one uses it properly, you are... in fact... ... begging the question! Another explanation for why you don't see it used properly is because people like me, who know what it means, never use it. At least I would never use it on rc.com - because it's commonly misunderstood, and when used correctly sounds kind of pompous. Don't have a stroke! GO
|
|
|
 |
 |

sp115
Jan 24, 2012, 9:57 PM
Post #23 of 27
(10951 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 17, 2007
Posts: 515
|
^^ A+* * properly/correctly? I may have to turn in my grammar-Nazi card.
|
|
|
 |
 |

drector
Jan 24, 2012, 10:41 PM
Post #24 of 27
(10929 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 27, 2002
Posts: 1037
|
sp115 wrote: ^^ A+* * properly/correctly? I may have to turn in my grammar-Nazi card. And now Godwins's law comes into play. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Dave P.S. Thanks to an earlier post that caused me to look up "Beg's the question." I now know not to use that phrase ever.
|
|
|
 |
 |

cracklover
Jan 24, 2012, 11:40 PM
Post #25 of 27
(10907 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 10162
|
drector wrote: sp115 wrote: ^^ A+* * properly/correctly? I may have to turn in my grammar-Nazi card. And now Godwins's law comes into play. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law Dave P.S. Thanks to an earlier post that caused me to look up "Beg's the question." I now know not to use that phrase ever. Cool. But who's this guy "Beg"?
|
|
|
 |
|
|