|
craggy
Aug 20, 2003, 7:20 PM
Post #26 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Oct 3, 2002
Posts: 112
|
In reply to: In reply to: hahahahaha - moron. T9 and rising.... There is no chance on earth this is T9, I could flash it in my flip-flops!
fair enough... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
rrrADAM
Aug 20, 2003, 7:21 PM
Post #27 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Dec 19, 1999
Posts: 17553
|
I'm gonna have to agree on T5, as the followups show that he necer read the grade chart. Been downgraded to a T2 after the followup replies to keep it going. Should have stuck with a winner. :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
cerikpete
Aug 20, 2003, 7:26 PM
Post #28 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Nov 22, 2002
Posts: 4043
|
T4+ :D
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Aug 20, 2003, 7:51 PM
Post #29 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
Yeah, I guess thats a bit like chipping holds. T2 it is.
In the guidebook. T2
|
|
|
|
|
boulderman
Aug 20, 2003, 7:53 PM
Post #30 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 18, 2003
Posts: 238
|
T2? :shock: You must be tall :D
Besides I have the FAT, (the FA of a T) and the average consensus is T5 :wink:
|
|
|
|
|
mackavus
Aug 20, 2003, 9:05 PM
Post #31 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 14, 2002
Posts: 322
|
After reading all of this I didnt wanna even comment anymore as we are all evil here.... :D But then again, its just too damn good and too easy not too....
I would have to agree with rrrAdam and rate it T2, but its a hard T2.. The landing is really sketchy and your sure to get hurt when you go. I still stand at T2 though.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Aug 20, 2003, 9:11 PM
Post #32 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
In reply to: T2? :shock: You must be tall :D Besides I have the FAT, (the FA of a T) and the average consensus is T5 :wink:
I claim foul! Invalid ascent!
The guy claims in one breath he doesn't have any knowledge of the T scale and then he lays out a well educated, calculated defense of the initial proposed rating!!!!
He's just a rating ho'!! You people were right! The T scale can have no integrity with people like this involved!
LOX, what can we do here??? LOX!!!
|
|
|
|
|
arkangel
Aug 20, 2003, 9:12 PM
Post #33 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2003
Posts: 45
|
In reply to: T2? :shock: You must be tall :D
??? Uhmm.... yeah
In reply to: Besides I have the FAT, (the FA of a T) and the average consensus is T5 :wink:
Someones sandbagging... I wonder if he even knows the T scale? Btw, what did people agree the T scale goes up to? 10 or 14?
|
|
|
|
|
climber49er
Aug 20, 2003, 9:16 PM
Post #34 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 8, 2003
Posts: 1404
|
T scale is currently topped at 15. There have been no repeats though, it could be downgraded.
|
|
|
|
|
arkangel
Aug 20, 2003, 9:20 PM
Post #35 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jun 30, 2003
Posts: 45
|
T15? Sweeeet mother! Where is this and who is this Sharma of Trolling with the ascent?
|
|
|
|
|
tenn_dawg
Aug 30, 2003, 3:46 AM
Post #36 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Mar 14, 2002
Posts: 3045
|
Moved to Bouldering...
Travis
|
|
|
|
|
collegekid
Aug 30, 2003, 4:23 AM
Post #37 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 7, 2002
Posts: 1852
|
T 6, no more, no less.
|
|
|
|
|
karmaklimber
Aug 30, 2003, 6:05 AM
Post #38 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 16, 2003
Posts: 363
|
In reply to: Those of you who say f!@$k the ratings and just have fun must not be able to climb harder than V0!
I can boulder V3s and V4s, thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
jedi
Sep 10, 2003, 1:24 AM
Post #39 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Sep 9, 2003
Posts: 5
|
V Ratings should only be used as guidelines, just like route beta, and should be taken with a grain of salt. Once you have been bouldering for a short time - you will realize that ratings, even in a single bouldering area - can vary quite drastically to what you might subjectively feel according to your own personal strengths and weaknesses. Thus, you will eventually learn to keep an open mind and attempt many problems based more on whether or not "it looks fun to you". (among many other reasons that do not include ratings.) :P
Unfortunately, many people are not capable of being humbled by their ego, but rather, are driven by it and choose to base their personal climbing/bouldering success by the subjective numbers of pure technical grading. Hell, some even choose their friends by it! Yes 'boulderman', there are many of us who tend to boulder problems that are graded much harder than VO who do not need grades to "prove" our successes or make us feel good about ourselves. 8) Hopefully, this truth will make itself clear to you when you are able to overcome your ego long enough to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
xanx
Sep 10, 2003, 2:11 AM
Post #40 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 6, 2002
Posts: 1002
|
In reply to: If climbing boulders isn't about ratings, then what is it about. Ratings on boulders are all about the next hardest rating right? It's not about safety. I say it's all about the ratings. Those of you who say f!@$k the ratings and just have fun must not be able to climb harder than V0! :shock:
ok here is where he shot himself in the foot. Way too obvious it was a troll by this point.
T2 at best.
Oh and u will all have to ask gawd about what a T15 feels like. to my knowledge he has the only ascent.
a little troll trivia: in what thread did this :troll: , the current troll smiley, first appear? (*hint* - it wasn't a smiley back then!)
|
|
|
|
|
sixter
Sep 10, 2003, 4:42 AM
Post #41 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2003
Posts: 262
|
In reply to: a little troll trivia: in what thread did this :troll: , the current troll smiley, first appear? (*hint* - it wasn't a smiley back then!)
The "Is Bouldering Really Rock Climbing?" thread
http://www.rockclimbing.com/...&topic_view=&start=0
|
|
|
|
|
deleted
Deleted
Sep 10, 2003, 5:08 AM
Post #42 of 50
(3605 views)
Shortcut
Registered:
Posts:
|
i stand by the first response...
either you're retarded...or, well, you're retarded...all of you are just plain retarded, so retarded...so very retarded, it's unbelievable how retarded and retarded all you retardedededsa are, it's just so retarded
|
|
|
|
|
climbalon
Sep 10, 2003, 5:15 AM
Post #43 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Apr 24, 2003
Posts: 101
|
alright, the thread is dead
|
|
|
|
|
herm
Sep 10, 2003, 8:00 PM
Post #44 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 498
|
Climbs without grades or not written in a proper guide book are not real.
|
|
|
|
|
xanx
Sep 10, 2003, 8:03 PM
Post #45 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 6, 2002
Posts: 1002
|
In reply to: In reply to: a little troll trivia: in what thread did this :troll: , the current troll smiley, first appear? (*hint* - it wasn't a smiley back then!) The "Is Bouldering Really Rock Climbing?" thread http://www.rockclimbing.com/...&topic_view=&start=0
excellent! ding ding ding!
|
|
|
|
|
mrcrimper
Sep 10, 2003, 8:24 PM
Post #46 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Jul 18, 2003
Posts: 5
|
V5s are way harder than a 5.7 start on a V0- or better yet start climbing stairs
|
|
|
|
|
herm
Sep 10, 2003, 8:42 PM
Post #47 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 498
|
"I only use ratings as a guideline to keep me within my limits for safety reasons so I don't get schtupp over in the middle of a climb"
|
|
|
|
|
herm
Sep 10, 2003, 8:46 PM
Post #48 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 498
|
ratings and the objective danger of a climb are two different things. A 5.12 crack you can sew up isn't nearly as dangerous as any blank face of any grade. You are trusting another stranger's opinion when you trust ratings. Guide book author's put that little disclaimer in the front for a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
sixter
Sep 12, 2003, 6:05 AM
Post #49 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: May 25, 2003
Posts: 262
|
In reply to: excellent! ding ding ding!
Ok, what do I win? :roll:
|
|
|
|
|
herm
Sep 12, 2003, 7:39 AM
Post #50 of 50
(3606 views)
Shortcut
Registered: Aug 26, 2003
Posts: 498
|
you don't 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
